Zendaya’s mom is speaking out (sort of) after the shocking “Euphoria” Season 3 finale left fans devastated. The emotional goodbye to one of the show’s main characters quickly sparked reactions from fans online, many of whom admitted they were still processing their devastating fate.

Following Sunday night’s emotional episode, Claire Stoermer took to Instagram Stories with a cryptic message that hinted she may have mixed feelings about how HBO’s hit drama came to an end.

“Lots of messages in my DM’s from people about last night’s episode,” Stoermer wrote. “I’m gonna keep my thoughts to myself. Definitely made me sad….and other emotions as well. But just gonna leave it right there…”

Her emotional post came just hours after viewers watched Zendaya’s beloved character, Rue Bennett, meet a heartbreaking fate in what has now been confirmed as the series’ final season.

Zendaya’s Rue Bennett Meets A Tragic End

The Season 3 finale delivered one of the show’s most devastating twists yet when Rue died from a fentanyl overdose after relapsing on laced painkillers given to her by Alamo Brown, played by Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje.

The emotional ending marked the close of Zendaya’s years-long run as Rue, a role that earned the actress two Emmy Awards and made television history. Since “Euphoria” premiered in 2019, Zendaya has taken home the trophy for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series twice, first in 2020 and again in 2022, becoming the youngest person ever to win the award following her first victory.

Zendaya Shared An Emotional Goodbye Behind The Scenes

Following the finale, HBO aired a behind-the-scenes segment featuring Zendaya reflecting on her time playing Rue and thanking the cast and crew who helped shape the series.

“I just want to say thank you,” Zendaya said. “I’m incredibly grateful for every single one of you. Many of you have been here since the beginning and watched me grow up. It’s been such a pleasure and an honor. Thank you so much.”

Sam Levinson Says Rue’s Ending ‘Felt Like The Honest Ending’

Series creator Sam Levinson has since defended the controversial decision to kill off Rue, confirming Season 3 marks the official end of “Euphoria.”

Levinson also admitted Rue’s ending was deeply personal. “There’s no reason to sugarcoat it,” he said. “I wanted to tell this story for Angus [Cloud] and for people who weren’t granted a second chance.” Angus Cloud, who starred in the first two seasons of the show as Fez, died of an accidental overdose in July 2023 at age 25.

“The honest ending is that people like Rue don’t make it,” Levinson added. “People relapse. They f-ck up. They’re not ready to get clean. And they weren’t dying like they are now, with the influx of fentanyl into this country.”

Angus Cloud Was Honored In The Final Episode

Levinson later described the finale as both heartbreaking and meaningful, explaining that Rue’s ending was also intended as a tribute to Cloud. Speaking during a Popcast interview, he called the finale “a tragic one in the end, but it’s also the truth.”

The episode included never-before-seen footage of Cloud, a moment Levinson said was deeply intentional. “It was a way of honoring Angus and saying a prayer for the future,” he said. “In terms of the story that we set out to tell, which is a story about addiction and its consequences, this feels like the end to me.”

Jacob Elordi Also Said Goodbye To Nate Jacobs In A Wild Finale Twist

While Rue’s devastating ending stunned fans, she wasn’t the only character to meet an unexpected fate in the finale, as Jacob Elordi’s Nate Jacobs also faced a dramatic end after finding himself buried alive in a coffin and coming face-to-face with a rattlesnake.

During a post-show segment that aired on HBO on May 24, Elordi opened up about filming the intense sequence, admitting the experience was far less terrifying than viewers may expect. “I had to go into this coffin. My shoulders were touching the side, and I couldn’t move my arms, and then they would drill the lid on, and it would get dark,” Elordi said. “It was really nice, actually. It was quite peaceful in there.”

Despite Nate’s dark and controversial journey throughout the series, Elordi said he appreciated the way the character’s story ultimately wrapped. Ultimately calling it a “cool way to go,” the actor reflected on Nate’s complicated arc.

“Nate is someone who’s made so many mistakes and made so many dark choices. It’s cool to see it all come to what it’s come to,” Elordi said of the character.

“Euphoria” is now streaming on HBO MAX.

Sydney Sweeney is once again fueling speculation that all may not be well between her and “Euphoria” co-star Zendaya. Following Sunday night’s shocking Season 3 finale, Sweeney shared a carousel of behind-the-scenes photos from the HBO drama, giving fans a peek at life on set with several of her fellow castmates. But one familiar face was noticeably absent from Sydney Sweeney’s post, and fans were quick to notice.

The actress posted photos alongside Jacob Elordi, Alexa Demie, Maude Apatow, and even included a snapshot of the late Eric Dane. Missing from the roundup, however, was Zendaya, who has starred opposite Sweeney on the hit series since its debut.

“It’s called… acting,” Sweeney captioned the post, seemingly shutting down criticism surrounding her raunchy portrayal of Cassie Howard.

It didn’t take long for fans to flood the comments section with theories after noticing Zendaya was nowhere to be found in the post. “There’s no photo in this slideshow with Zendaya; I’m confused …” one fan wrote. Another added, “Zendaya doesn’t like [Sweeney] because of her values.”

“Not one picture with Rue; I’m crying, Zendaya do NOT like you,” another user commented. The speculation quickly reignited long-running rumors that tension may exist between the two stars behind the scenes.

Rumors Of A Rift Have Followed The ‘Euphoria’ Stars For Months

Back in November 2025, The Daily Mail reported that Sweeney and Zendaya were allegedly “locked in a bitter feud,” with claims that differing political beliefs may have played a role in the rumored fallout.

Sweeney, a registered Republican voter, also faced backlash surrounding her American Eagle denim campaign, which some critics accused of containing racist undertones. According to the outlet, Zendaya allegedly refused to participate in press appearances alongside Sweeney during the Season 3 rollout, and the pair reportedly avoided standing near one another at events.

Rumors only intensified in March when Sweeney was missing from a “Euphoria” cast photoshoot. However, Page Six later reported the absence was simply due to scheduling conflicts while she filmed a scene. Still, questions resurfaced the following month after fans claimed the actresses appeared to avoid one another at the Season 3 premiere.

Another ‘Euphoria’ Star Shut Down The Rumors

Despite the speculation, not everyone connected to the HBO drama is buying into feud claims. “Euphoria” cast member Jessica Blair Herman publicly denied rumors of tension between the two actresses, insisting things on set were far less dramatic than fans may think.

“They really did, and I’m not just saying that,” Herman said during an appearance on “Good Day New York.” “Really, they’ve created this beautiful working relationship, and everyone wants to do the work, to come in and do the job.”

When explaining why there are no backstage photos of the pair together, she pointed to the show’s filming schedule, saying, “To be fair, when I was there, they’re not sharing scenes. Their storylines are very separate, you’re shooting on different days and stuff.”

‘Euphoria’ Finale Leaves Fans Reeling

Whether the pair ever works together again may ultimately be out of their hands. Sunday’s Season 3 finale seemingly brought Zendaya’s Rue Bennett story to a devastating end after the character died from a fentanyl overdose following a relapse involving laced Percocet.

Creator Sam Levinson later explained the heartbreaking storyline was deeply personal and partly inspired by the 2023 death of former “Euphoria” star Angus Cloud. “People relapse. They f-ck up. They’re not ready to get clean, and they weren’t dying like they are now with the influx of fentanyl into this country,” Levinson said.

He continued, “I could say with absolute certainty that if I were going through what I went through when I was younger now, then I wouldn’t be here, either. There’s no reason to sugarcoat that. I wanted to tell the story for Angus and for people who aren’t granted a second chance.”

Angus Cloud Passed Away Before ‘Euphoria’ Season 3

Cloud died from an accidental overdose, triggered by a lethal combination of methamphetamine, cocaine, fentanyl, and benzodiazepines. His tragic death came just one week after he traveled to Ireland to lay his father to rest, a loss he had reportedly been grieving deeply.

Despite his well-documented struggles with substance abuse and the emotional toll of recent events, his mother later insisted his passing was not intentional, saying he had been excited about upcoming projects and focused on supporting his family.

“Euphoria” is now streaming on HBO MAX.

Had A24’s Backrooms not broken its own records this past weekend, the near-unbelievable performance of Focus Features’ Obsession would have once again dominated headlines. Obsession registered another weekend-to-weekend increase in box-office revenue, following a 40% increase in its sophomore frame. To be clear, every movie that is released in theaters these days is expected to report a decline in revenue over the course of its run, unless it’s a tiny indie being given a platform release. Obsession, however, has largely maintained its domestic theater count over the last fortnight. In its third weekend, the horror sensation passed the coveted $100 million mark and became Focus Features’ top-grossing domestic release of all time.

The movie made $26 million in its third weekend, which represents a 10% increase from its second-weekend earnings of $24 million. Obsession‘s second-weekend haul marked a 40% increase over its debut of $17 million. What’s more astonishing is the fact that the movie cost under $1 million to produce and likely less than $10 million to market. It was picked up for domestic distribution by Focus for a reported $15 million after its premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival in 2025. Obsession was directed by Curry Barker, a 26-year-old who honed his filmmaking skills on YouTube and self-financed his first feature for $800. He is now the toast of the town, with two movies already lined up, and several studios engaged in a major bidding war for his third.

‘Obsession’ Is Nearing a Major Global Box-Office Milestone

Obsession stars Michael Johnstone as a young man who casts a spell on a young woman (played by Inde Navarrette) and then suffers the consequences of violating consent. The film is benefiting from near-unanimous praise from critics and widespread enthusiasm from audiences. It holds a “Certified Fresh” 96% critics’ score and a “Verified Hot” 94% audience score on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, where the consensus reads, “Taking an icky conceit and twisting it to deviously crowd-pleasing ends, Obsession is dauntingly disturbing while also skillfully amusing and thrilling.”

In her review for Collider, Hannah Hunt described the movie as “an awkward wish-fulfillment fantasy quickly mutates into something uglier, sadder, and genuinely disturbing.” With nearly $150 million worldwide already, box-office projections for the phenomenon currently put its final global haul at around $330 million. For context, this is higher than any installment of the Scream franchise, the Insidious franchise, and any movie that Jordan Peele has directed.

Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

May 15, 2026

Runtime

108 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Curry Barker

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 7 seconds ago

You want to know the scariest word you can ever hear from an artist? “Deconstruction.” That’s the fancy term creators use when they want to tear something apart in order to understand how it was made. Done well, this can absolutely transform entire genres. For example, Alan Moore’s seminal Watchmen was designed as a deconstruction of superhero stories, and this unflinching glimpse into the psychology of self-proclaimed heroes has influenced the last four decades of tights-and-flights comics and movies. Done poorly, though, and a deconstruction falls apart, ultimately revealing why the original design was so effective in the first place. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened with In a Violent Nature (2024). 

The movie serves as a deconstruction of the slasher genre and is a not-so-secret homage to the Friday the 13th series. It’s a film with a truly fascinating gimmick: we watch the entire story unfold from the killer’s point of view. Like, have you ever wondered what Jason Voorhees is doing whenever he isn’t dramatically hacking and slashing his way through horny young people? In a Violent Nature attempts to answer that question, and it gives us some of the most gruesome kills in modern horror. Unfortunately, it doesn’t take long for the gimmick of this movie to fall apart and leave you wishing you were watching a traditional slasher instead. 

When Nature Calls

The plot of In a Violent Nature begins when a group of friends discovers a mysterious locket hanging from a fire tower. When one of them grabs the locket, he unknowingly awakens the corpse of a serial killer. As he hacks and slashes his way through the woods to retrieve the locket, we get some backstory: the killer, Johnny, was once a developmentally disabled boy who died falling from a fire tower when a prank went sideways. Over the years, mysterious deaths have been attributed to Johnny’s vengeful spirit. Now, he’s back and scarier than ever, leaving his victims to answer a chilling question: how do you kill someone who’s already dead?

Obviously, Johnny is a thinly-veiled stand-in for Jason Voorhees. Like the famous Friday the 13th killer, Johnny was a developmentally delayed kid whose death was caused by idiot teenagers. Like Jason, he has inexplicably risen from the dead on multiple occasions, and he’s nearly unstoppable once he gets to killing. Unfortunately, In a Violent Nature’s gimmick keeps Jonny from being as sympathetic or compelling as Jason. Movies like Friday the 13th: Part 2 helped to humanize Jason Voorhees, and his relatively limited screen time made him a mysterious character fans loved to speculate about. Here, Johnny is directly in front of the camera for almost all of the film, robbing the character of any real mystery.

The Man Behind The Mask

Jonny’s constant presence also makes it more difficult to put together this movie’s barebones plot. Keep in mind that we are seeing almost everything from a third-person POV centered on the killer, which means that almost all of the story that we get comes from seeing Jonny effectively eavesdropping on other people. It’s always hard to concentrate on what the other characters were talking about because I was waiting for our slasher to make his move. Like, remember the awesome campfire scene in Friday the 13th: Part 2, where we learn more about Jason Voorhees? Imagine how much worse the whole thing would be if we were just watching Jason watching the camp counselors. 

Now, one area where In a Violent Nature really shines is in its gruesome kills. This is a Friday the 13th-style movie made for the post-Saw era, so our hapless characters almost never get an easy death. Early on, Jonny brutally garottes someone against a tree. At another point, we watch him methodically feed a living victim into a wood chipper, and the prolonged scene makes you feel every moment of this guy’s excruciating torment. In the movie’s most famous kill, we see him hook a poor girl and literally pull her head through her own torso and out her back before he sends her dead body careening down the world’s steepest hill.

The Real Reason You Watch Horror Movies

That brings us to the most divisive element of the movie. In a Violent Nature does a poor job of deconstructing horror movies, but it does help viewers discover exactly why they watch scary movies in the first place. If you’re just here for cool kills and buckets of blood, this film is very nearly perfect. Every kill is memorably nasty, and they are carried out by an iconically ugly killer. Personally, though, I prefer slashers with colorful, memorable victims. This helps us actually care about these people before they are turned into mincemeat. Here, everyone but Jonny is so forgettable that they are just one step above the nameless henchmen in a Marvel movie.

Going in, I really wanted to like In a Violent Nature. I’m a Friday the 13th superfan who is proud to have Jason Voorhees tattooed on my body. Since his franchise has been in legal limbo for so long, I was quite eager to watch a movie that served as a kind of spiritual sequel to the early Friday films. However, writer/director Chris Nash forgot the golden rule of making an homage movie: if you can’t do something better, you shouldn’t do it at all. In this case, all but the worst Friday the 13th movies are better than In a Violent Nature, and you’re infinitely better off watching one of those films instead.

In a Violent Nature is divisive, to put it mildly. Critics loved its bold new take on the slasher genre, while general audiences thought the movie was as slow and plodding as Johnny himself. However, the movie is a solid watch for gorehounds, and it deserves props for its memorable kills, practical effects, and the gallon upon gallon of blood that gets spilled by our creepy killer. If you’re looking for a film with thrilling kills and a chilling villain design, you should definitely stream this movie on Hulu. Otherwise, you should skip the genre deconstruction and just watch a film where you might actually care about one or two of the characters. 

IN A VIOLENT NATURE SCORE

Tom Holland is opening up about the surprising new direction behind Spider-Man: Brand New Day, and it sounds like Marvel and Sony are taking Peter Parker into completely uncharted territory.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Cover [credit: Empire Magazine]

Speaking with Empire, Holland revealed that he actually pitched part of the movie’s story himself, describing it as a “Spider-puberty” concept centered around Peter Parker evolving into adulthood while dealing with dramatic new changes to his powers. According to Holland, “They liked the idea,” and the film appears ready to push Spider-Man further than fans have seen before.

The comments line up with everything Marvel has teased so far about the upcoming movie. Following the emotional ending of Spider-Man: No Way Home, Peter Parker is now completely alone in New York after Doctor Strange’s spell erased him from everyone’s memory. Marvel has repeatedly described Brand New Day as a “fresh start” for the character, with Holland himself calling it “the first movie in the next chapter.”

What makes the new film especially interesting is the reported evolution of Peter’s abilities. Early details surrounding the movie suggest his powers may begin mutating in unexpected ways, including the possibility of organic webbing similar to Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man films.

Holland also recently explained that the story is heavily focused on identity and growing up, saying the film explores “when young people really find their identity and become adults.”

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Cover [credit: Empire Magazine]

That more grounded coming-of-age direction appears to be exactly what Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige wants for the franchise moving forward. Feige has teased that the movie will deliver a more “classic” Spider-Man story after years of multiverse chaos.

The film is also set to bring in some major new faces. Jon Bernthal is expected to appear as The Punisher, creating what Holland described as a “big brother-little brother rivalry” dynamic between Frank Castle and Peter Parker.

Meanwhile, fans are already buzzing over the film’s darker tone, practical effects, and newly revealed suit design that leans closer to the classic comic book look.

With Spider-Man: Brand New Day positioned as a full reset for Holland’s version of Peter Parker, Marvel may finally be giving fans the street-level Spider-Man story they’ve wanted for years.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day swings into theaters July 31, 2026.

With Marvel Studios moving forward on its X-Men reboot under director Jake Schreier, speculation surrounding the cast has reached a fever pitch. Fans have spent months debating which actors should join the iconic mutant team, while online rumors and alleged “insider reports” continue to circulate across social media. Given the X-Men’s status as one of Marvel’s most popular and enduring franchises, that level of interest is hardly surprising. However, according to Schreier, audiences may want to approach many of those reports with skepticism, as not everything being shared online should be taken at face value.

Speaking with Collider’s Perri Nemiroff at the Gotham Television Awards, Schreier — nominated as a producer for Outstanding Limited or Anthology Series on Season 2 of Beef — addressed whether casting has begun on Marvel Studios’ upcoming X-Men movie and, while the director confirmed that conversations are happening, he also made it clear that most of the casting rumors floating around online are not coming from inside the production.

“We’re talking about things, we’re thinking about things,” Schreier said. “I can tell you most of the stuff that gets posted online, I don’t know where it comes from, because it doesn’t come from our room, and it isn’t what we’re discussing. But there is a process.”

Now, if we were being particularly picky, we’d note that Schreier said most of the stuff online. So maybe out there, somewhere, one lucky fan has posted a fan casting that might well be on the money and if that happened, you can bet stomachs dropped around the room. But for now, it’s top secret and that’s probably the way it should be. After all, Marvel is in the process of a big cultural reboot and the X-Men is one of their final cards they’ve yet to play. They need to get this right, and you can bet they’re feeling some of the pressure. But then, pressure turns coal into diamonds, so let’s have some faith.

Who Will Star in Marvel’s X-Men Reboot?

As for who will actually appear in the movie, it’s clearly still up in the air, but it’s important to remember that Marvel is already employing some of the original X-Men characters in Avengers: Doomsday, with Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, James Marsden, Rebecca Romijn, Kelsey Grammer and Alan Cumming all returning for the mega-picture. Channing Tatum, who finally debuted as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine, is involved too, and we’re betting he’d love to stay involved, if that were an option. For now, the next X-Men movie remains officially under wraps, but Schreier’s comments have made one thing clear. Don’t check your timeline for casting news, Marvel will let you know when it’s time.

Marvel Studios’ X-Men does not yet have a release date.

Advertisement

Release Date

July 13, 2000

Advertisement

Runtime

104 minutes

Director

Advertisement

Bryan Singer

Producers

Avi Arad, Lauren Shuler Donner, Ralph Winter, Richard Donner

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 12 seconds ago

If you watch enough horror movies, you learn to dread one thing above all else: weird vanity projects from rock stars. Musicians just love the genre, and when some of them get enough money (or just get bored enough), they crank out some of the most forgettable movies on the planet. For example, the Glenn Danzig-directed film Verotika, a movie so bad that I hope the Geneva Convention eventually classifies it as a war crime. Plus, while he has his fans, Rob Zombie is one of the worst directors to grace the genre, and his Halloween movies feel like nothing more than big-budget fan films.

Because of this, I was very skeptical about Studio 666 (2022), a movie prominently featuring Dave Grohl and the rest of the Foo Fighters. The story came from Grohl, and he and his band are playing fictionalized versions of themselves. Normally, such a vanity project would be an unmitigated disaster. However, the film is a strange brew that tastes weirdly smooth. Grohl is oddly charming as the lead, and his expressive face will make you laugh long before he opens his mouth. The whole thing is a horror comedy done well, and it’s currently streaming for free on Tubi. That means you don’t have to cut into your rock festival budget to jam out to Studio 666.

Rock and Soul

The premise of Studio 666 is that the Foo Fighters are having trouble coming up with songs for their next album. Under pressure from their very intense manager, the band ends up temporarily moving into a spooky old mansion, hoping the change in scenery will get their creative juices flowing. Unfortunately, the house is quite literally haunted, and it doesn’t take long before Dave Grohl gets possessed by a nasty demon. Soon, the band members start dying off, turning the rest of the film into a race against the one thing even scarier than writer’s block: flesh-eating monsters!

Dave Grohl and the rest of the Foo Fighters (including Rami Jaffee, Nate Mendel, Chris Shiflett, Pat Smear, and the late, great Taylor Hawkins) all play themselves, and they serve as the core cast of Studio 666. Going in, I thought this was a recipe for disaster, but I was quickly proven wrong. The breezy script provides each band member with a few laugh-out-loud moments, and the band’s chemistry helps to elevate even the clunkiest dialogue. Grohl, in particular, is a revelation, deftly transforming from lead singer to leading man in a relentlessly hilarious performance. It’s a horror comedy that’s funnier than it is scary, and most of the humor comes from Grohl’s charmingly sincere acting.

Who Needs Plot When You Have Vibes? 

As you might suspect, Studio 666 doesn’t have much of a plot to get in the way of the movie. The mansion the band moves into is really just an excuse to have a fun atmosphere for the kills, which are one of the film’s undisputed highlights. No two bandmates die in exactly the same way, and the exact manner of each death simply gets crazier over time. The onscreen gore is great, and none of the characters take the deaths too seriously. After a poor techie gets electrocuted, for example, they simply decide to dedicate the next album to him. This just adds to the off-kilter comedy, making these over-the-top kills that much funnier.

Like many horror films before it, Studio 666 was misunderstood by professional reviewers. It currently has a 56 percent on Rotten Tomatoes, with critics complaining that it doesn’t get the horror/comedy balance right and that you have to be a major Foo Fighters fan to enjoy it. However, average moviegoers seriously disagreed with this assessment, which is why the movie has a much higher audience score of 80 percent. Incidentally, audiences mostly agreed that the Foo Fighters make for hilarious horror stars and that Studio 666 delivered the exact amount of gore and gut-busting laughs they were hoping for.

A Devil Of A Good Time

Unfortunately, this musician horror masterpiece has largely been overlooked by both fans of the band and fans of the genre. While the movie had a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it theatrical release, it was always intended as more of a direct-to-video release. It made little fanfare when it came out in 2022, and it didn’t take long for this movie to end up on streaming. While it was lost in the noise for a while (have you ever really looked at the sheer number of horror movies that come out each year?), the movie developed a cult following and established itself as one of the most crowdpleasing horror films of the last decade.

Been jamming out to the Foo Fighters since the ‘90s? Looking for a genuinely scary movie that can still make you laugh? Or maybe you just want to see if Dave Grohl can carry a movie as easily as he can carry a tune? No matter the reason, Studio 666 is a bonkers horror/comedy that’s worth watching, ideally with a beer in each hand and your best friends by your side. You can stream it completely for free, meaning that you don’t have to pay a thing to torment your friends with the stupidest possible bit: pointing at the screen like Leonardo DiCaprio and saying “there goes my hero” whenever Grohl is onscreen.

Will they sacrifice you to a demon? Maybe. But if this movie teaches us anything, it’s that really great creatives suffer because of their art!

The skull-faced Skeletor is the archenemy of He-Man…and is one of the most meme-able animated characters in history. Before he takes to the big screen this week in Masters of the Universe, you can put him through his paces in a new endless-runner mobile game. Skeletor: Until Next Time is now available to download wherever you get your apps.

Inspired by both the classic 1980s cartoon He-Man and the Masters of the Universe and the multitude of memes that it spawned, Skeletor: Until Next Time takes Skeletor from meme to screen, running through the endless hellscape of Snake Mountain and its environs. He can also fly, or even ride upon his faithful feline steed, Panthor. He can also call upon the abilities of his loyal allies, like the sorceress Evil-Lyn, the brutish Beast Man, and the crustaceous Clawful. However, even as he dodges obstacles and traverses crevasses, he’ll have to face the accursed He-Man and his allies, including weapons master Man-At-Arms, warrior Teela, and scout Mekaneck. Skeletor: Until Next Time is Mattel’s first-ever self-published mobile game, and was developed in partnership with Amber.

Who Is Skeletor?

Skeletor is the leader of an evil coterie of warriors and creatures on the planet Eternia; from his headquarters, Snake Mountain, he plots to defeat He-Man and acquire the mystical power of Castle Grayskull for himself. In some continuities, Skeletor is secretly Keldor, the uncle of He-Man’s alter ego, Prince Adam; tutored by the evil Hordak, his body and mind were warped by black magic.

In the original He-Man and the Masters of the Universe cartoon series, Skeletor’s high-pitched, cackling voice was provided by actor Alan Oppenheimer. He has subsequently been voiced by a bevy of voice actors, including Campbell Lane, Brian Dobson, Mark Hamill, and Benjamin Diskin. He was first portrayed in live action in 1987’s big-screen Masters of the Universe movie by Frank Langella, who rewrote most of his dialogue and still considers the part to be one of his favorite roles; while the film was largely panned, Langella’s menacing performance is commonly cited as a high point.

Skeletor is next set to appear in Masters of the Universe, where he’ll be played in his skull-faced glory by Jared Leto. He’ll face off against Nicholas Galitzine‘s He-Man when the Travis Knight-helmed film hits theaters on June 5.

Skeletor: Until Next Time is now available to download on your mobile device. Stay tuned to Collider for future updates…until next time. Bwa ha ha ha!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

1983 – 1985-00-00

Advertisement

Showrunner

Lou Scheimer

Directors

Advertisement

Gwen Wetzler, Lou Kachivas, Marsh Lamore

Advertisement

• 
• 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Is Queer Eye’s Antoni Porowski on the guest list for Taylor Swift’s wedding to Travis Kelce?

The celebrity chef was quizzed by a caller on whether he managed to snag an invite to the super A-list nuptials during a Monday, June 1, appearance on Watch What Happens Live With Andy Cohen. However, Porowski, 42, was coy in his response.

“They’re getting married?” he quipped. “I should really send some flowers or some kind of a congratulations.”

Porowski’s evasive answer prompted host Andy Cohen to chime in, “And because he didn’t answer your question, that means he is going.”

Related: Ryan Seacrest Offers to Officiate Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s Wedding

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s upcoming wedding will likely be the celebrity ceremony of the century — and plenty of other stars are already pitching their services. After the Kansas City Chiefs tight end popped the question in August, celebs with wedding-ready skills started offering themselves as vendors. “It’s time to call in the ultimate […]

The reality star was also asked about Swift’s culinary skills, revealing that, “The best thing she ever cooked for me, it was an Ottolenghi recipe for meatballs.”

“It was really delicious and she inspired me to start putting more herbs and doing kind of like green meatballs,” he added.

Swift and Kelce, both 36, announced their engagement in August 2025 after two years of dating.

In April, a source told Us Weekly that the couple are planning a summer wedding in Rhode Island, where the singer owns an $18 million mansion, possibly on June 13.

Advertisement

Related: Inside Taylor Swift’s Plans for Her Star-Studded Bachelorette Party

Taylor Swift is going all out for her bachelorette party. A source exclusively tells Us Weekly the pop superstar, 36, may be planning two separate girls’ trips “so all of her closest friends can be there,” adding that New York City, Nashville and the Bahamas are options. “There could be multiple getaways, and they all […]

“They’re both involved and making decisions together,” said the source, adding that they are “focused on actually enjoying the process rather than getting caught up in the pressure” of organizing the wedding. “They’re keeping things light,” the source shared.

A second insider said that the wedding will likely be split between Swift’s mansion and the nearby Ocean House seaside resort.

“The guest list grew, so the ceremony and private gatherings associated with the wedding [will be split between the venues],” the source said. “Taylor always has a plan B and C for every scenario.”

“They’ve gone back and forth between inviting everyone and keeping it small and private,” said the insider. “As of now, they’ve scaled it down. It’s no longer going to be a massive blowout.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

Related: Andy Reid Hints He’s Invited to Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s Wedding

Andy Reid dropped a subtle hint that he was invited — and plans on attending — Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift’s upcoming wedding. During a Thursday, May 14, appearance on radio station 96.5’s The Drive show, the Kansas City Chiefs coach, 68, was asked if he received his invitation for the power couple’s nuptials. “Well, […]

The source said the couple’s “wedding timeline is based on Travis’ offseason rhythm,” as the Kansas City Chiefs tight end prepares for NFL training camp in July ahead of the new football season.

Swift previously teased her wedding to Kelce during an October 2025 appearance on The Graham Norton Show.

“I know it’s gonna be fun to plan, because I think the only stressful weddings are the ones where you have a small amount [of room] and people are on the bubble and you have to evaluate or assess your relationship with them to see if they should be there. I’m not gonna do that,” she said, joking, “I shouldn’t have said any of that.”