Connect with us

NewsBeat

A new measure of courage: how Maasai warriors became lion guardians

Published

on

A new measure of courage: how Maasai warriors became lion guardians

Can conservation succeed by adapting tradition rather than erasing it? In east Africa, Maasai warriors are redefining what it means to be brave by helping people and lions co-exist

The cattle are still stirring inside the safety of their enclosures when Saitoti Petro Lorkuta makes his morning rounds, threading his motorbike through the communal Maasai pastures east of Tanzania’s Tarangire national park. Every so often, he cuts the engine, crouches low and reads the dust, scanning the trails between patches of dense scrub and below the umbrella-shaped canopies of acacia trees for the tell-tale print of a lion’s paw.

As a child, Lorkuta (pictured below) wondered whether he would ever see a lion roaming the savannahs of his homeland. Maasai elders told tales of legendary hunts, proudly displaying old battle scars, but the roar of the big cats had all but vanished from the rangelands’ nocturnal soundtrack of elephants, zebras, whooping hyenas and grunting buffalo.

Advertisement

Today, aged 35, encounters with lions are an increasingly common – and welcomed – part of Lorkuta’s life. And instead of proving his Maasai warrior mettle with a spear, he prefers a quieter test of courage: a stare-off.

Advertisement

“I stay still, the lion looks at me, and I stare back,” he says. “Eventually, the lion goes. The first time it happened, the lion was very close and I was scared, but not any more.”

Lorkuta is one of more than 160 Maasai ‘Warriors for Wildlife’ working across dozens of rural communities in northern Tanzania through the charity African People and Wildlife (APW). Blending centuries-old bushcraft with GPS technology and conservation science, these men are redefining what it means to be a Maasai in the 21st century, and building a future where predators and pastoralists can thrive side by side.

Bravery has long underpinned Maasai identity and, historically, there was no greater measure of courage than defending the herd against a hungry pride. Spearing a lion brought status, lifelong respect, even some love interest.

A century ago, when 200,000 lions roamed the African continent, those hunts – part protection, part rite of passage – had little impact on the species’ survival. Today, between 20,000 and 32,000 remain in the wild, with roughly half concentrated in east African strongholds like Tanzania. At the same time, climate pressures, shrinking habitats and expanding human settlement have pressed lions and pastoralists into ever closer competition for land and water.

Advertisement

APW began working in the wider Tarangire-Manyara ecosystem in 2005 with a community-led approach, supporting villages to monitor human-wildlife encounters while strengthening their bomas, or livestock corrals. Planting living walls of thorny commiphora trees, reinforced with chain-link fencing, helped keep marauding lions and other predators at bay.

In 2010, APW founders Charles Trout and Dr Laly Lichtenfeld were joined by Elvis Kisimir, a respected Maasai warrior with deep ties to communities across northern Tanzania. Kisimir began encouraging pastoralists to rethink their relationship with lions, warning that by driving them towards extinction, the Maasai also risked erasing a defining feature of their own identity. 

Advertisement

“That was the turning point,” says Kisimir. “People realised that without the lions, there could be no Maasai warriors.”

He recruited a small group of men who, like Lorkuta, could use their intimate knowledge of the bush to track lion movements and advise herders on safer grazing routes.

The government tried its own way of conservation using men in uniform with guns, chasing people, and it didn’t work. We solved it by sitting down under the tree and talking

Word spread quickly. Communities began writing to APW asking to join, lending legitimacy to a conservation model they could shape themselves – starting with the walls of their own bomas – rather than having it imposed from above.

“The government tried its own way of conservation using men in uniform with guns, chasing people, and it didn’t work,” says Kisimir. “We solved it by sitting down under the tree and talking, asking people what the problem was.”

Advertisement

Today, Lorkuta and his fellow warriors carry GPS devices and smartphones to monitor lions and other carnivores, uploading sightings to an online mapping system that helps pastoralists choose where to graze, and sharing sightings in their communal WhatsApp group. When lions do strike, warriors move quickly to calm tensions before retaliatory hunts can begin.

“During the day, we visit the watering holes and talk to herders about the importance of conserving the lions,” Lorkuta says. “In the evening, if they’ve lost livestock in the bush, we go and recover it.”

The role carries real respect, offering a new route to prestige based on protecting lions rather than killing them.

“People in the community like what we’re doing,” Lorkuta says. “The conservation work brings jobs and opportunities. It’s even made me friends from abroad.”

Kisimir believes it also taps into the Maasai’s longstanding desire for recognition.

“Bravery for the Maasai is about being known,” he says. “This work is another way, and we’re looking for more, like games or competitions. If a warrior wins, people will sing and praise him.”

Advertisement

Across the border in southern Kenya, the conservation charity Lion Guardians (LG) has spent the last two decades building a similar model, beginning from a base around Amboseli national park, against the backdrop of a looming Mount Kilimanjaro. Eric Ole Kesoi, the organisation’s community manager and a renowned Maasai tracker himself, explains that years of conflict had made lions instinctively wary of the tribe’s vivid red shukas.

The cloaks remain a powerful symbol of Maasai identity, but as lion hunting declined, so did the shuka’s deterrent effect. To reinforce the association – but without the bloodshed – Kesoi encouraged the guardians to stage mock hunts and chase emboldened lions away. “We don’t go with spears: we go with thunder flashes and make traditional yelps to let them know we’re chasing them. We wear the red shukas, and they know we are Maasai.”

Advertisement

For Kesoi, these encounters help preserve the warrior culture while replacing killing with stewardship.

“They track these lions and give them names: they know each individual, and share the same landscape.” he explains. “In the community, they’re perceived as privileged because they’re still interacting with lions. And above all, they’re getting paid.”

That income matters. It means guardians can buy more livestock, pay school fees and support extended families, helping change ideas around status and masculinity.

They have more privilege now from taking care of lions than from making a name by killing them. It’s a complete shift in mindset

“They have more privilege now from taking care of lions than from making a name by killing them,” says Kesoi. “It’s a complete shift in mindset.”

Advertisement

LG co-founder Stephanie Dolreny says women have played a role in accelerating that change. When a warrior killed a lion, she notes, one of the main motivations was female attention – but that appeal was short-lived.

“It’s not money in the bank,” she says. “Now the women are saying: ‘We don’t want a man who kills a lion, we want a man with a job’. It’s almost like the women are changing the dynamic of what a desirable man looks like.”

Not everyone embraces the new culture of coexistence. For the Maasai, cattle are far more than livestock: they are wealth, status and primary food source. A single cow can fetch USD$500-600 (£372-446), while some animals carry deep personal or cultural significance beyond their market value.

Many pastoralists are learning to tolerate occasional losses, but only to a point. Retaliatory lion killings still happen and, though rare, those working at both APW and LG have witnessed entire prides wiped out by poison, along with the vultures, hyenas and countless other scavengers that feed on the carcasses.

Advertisement

In Kenya, Lion Guardians patrols have reached poisoned lions in time for vets to administer antidotes. In Tanzania, Kisimir draws on Maasai lore to discourage poisoning. “I remind communities that a warrior is only allowed to kill nine lions,” he says. “If you exceed that, your clan will be cursed.”

Where the model has taken hold, the results are striking. The Lion Guardians programme now spans more than 3,600 sq km (1,390 sq miles) of habitat. Since launching 20 years ago, lion killings have fallen by 90% and numbers have increased seven-fold, creating one of Africa’s densest wild lion populations outside a protected area. For the Maasai, the programme prevents livestock losses worth millions of dollars every year.

Advertisement

APW reports similar success in Tanzania, where It estimates field teams have recovered more than 16,000 lost livestock worth $3.5m (£2.6m) since 2017, and helped prevent almost three-quarters of reported attempts to kill lions, as well as 59% of attempts to kill other predators. Some 150 lions, including many cubs, have been saved as a result.

“It’s easily scalable,” says APW’s Charles Trout. “It’s about empowering communities to take action for their own benefit.”

Money and manpower are the only limitations, he suggests. Boma fortifications are part-funded by APW. “Although we have had places where people have installed their own living walls,” Trout adds.

Advertisement

Data collection in progress at African People and Wildlife. Image: Marcus Westberg

“Then we’re also taking care of the warriors on the ground, they get training every year. It’s taking an interest in people’s lives, so the limitation is just being able to be there to do it.”

For Lorkuta, the return of lions represents more than conservation success. It signals the slow repair of a landscape he once feared was losing its voice. “There came a time when the lions were disappearing. I thought my children would only ever see them in books or in the parks,” he says.

Advertisement

Now, roars are returning to the rangelands at night and lions leave their marks in the morning dust. Lorkuta looks forward to the next stare-off: a sign, he says, that all is well.

“If you see a lion, it means things are balanced: the ecosystem, the climate, everything. At least now there is a future for them.”

New models of coexistence

 

Advertisement

1) Rewriting the next generation’s story

Founded in 2010 in response to a surge in elephant poaching, Big Life Foundation (BLF) employs hundreds of Maasai rangers and ex-poachers to protect two million acres of wilderness across Kenya’s greater Amboseli ecosystem, helping drive down wildlife crime while creating jobs rooted in conservation. Human-wildlife conflict and habitat degradation are still a challenge, but thanks to BLF’s vigilance, not a single elephant has been lost to trophy poachers since 2018. BLF’s sergeant Mutinda Ndivo – once an infamous poacher – now heads up their dog unit. 

“Someone like Mutinda is no longer simply surviving day to day; he is actively contributing to protecting one of the world’s most important ecosystems,” the organisation said. “That can fundamentally reshape personal identity and long-term aspirations.

Advertisement

“It also changes the story being passed to the next generation. Children grow up seeing conservation as a viable and respected livelihood.”

Image: L-R, constable ⁠Kioko Mulwa, constable Nkidaa Tonkoi and constable Lenku Turere of Big Life Foundation, photographed by Joshua Clay

Advertisement
2) New livelihoods for former poachers

Olgulului Community Wildlife Rangers

In Zambia’s Luangwa Valley, Community Markets for Conservation is helping wildlife poachers find new means of supporting their families. More than 2,000 have surrendered their weapons and reskilled in practices such as sustainable agriculture. Many now help protect animals instead of killing them and have formed their own group – the Transformed Poachers Association of Zambia – to help spread the word and combat wildlife crime.

Image: Dmitrii Zhodzishskii

Advertisement
3) Living alongside lions in the Maasai heartland

KopeLion has been operating in Tanzania’s Ngorongoro Conservation Area since 2011, where it supports 28 former Maasai lion killers to monitor big cats and prevent conflict. Each livestock guardian is responsible for patrolling a 60-120km (23-46 sq mile) patch close to their community. Participating villages earn money based on the presence of lions in the area. The programme aims to create a ‘corridor of tolerance’ stretching from the Ngorongoro crater to the Serengeti.

Advertisement

Image: Philip J. Briggs

4) Community rangers in the field

Advertisement

Local people become the key responders in efforts to reduce poaching and human-wildlife conflict through the Olgulului Community Wildlife Rangers programme. Operating in Kenya, it trains and employs Maasai community members to support wildlife protection, monitor threatened species and gather information on illegal hunting. Its pioneering all-female unit, Team Lioness, has expanded opportunities for women while challenging traditional gender norms around conservation.

Image: Ahmed Galal

Main image: Maasai wildlife tracker Olubi ‘Mitiaki’ Lairumbe uses a radio antenna to locate a collared lion beneath Mount Kilimanjaro, photographed by Philip J. Briggs

Advertisement

Portraits of a Shared Land brings readers face-to-face with some of the people reshaping conservation across Africa, exploring approaches that place communities, local knowledge and lived experience at their heart. This series is produced by Positive News and supported through a Human-Centred Conservation Storytelling Grant from Jamma Conservation & Communities.

The views and opinions expressed in this story are those of the authors and contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of Jamma Conservation & Communities.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

I started litter picking on maternity leave: It turned into founding an organisation

Published

on

I started litter picking on maternity leave: It turned into founding an organisation
Hafsa saw there was litter in her local area, and decided to take things into her own hands (literally) (Picture: Supplied)

Not all heroes wear capes… our Unsung Heroes series celebrates ordinary people doing extraordinary work.

Today, it’s Hafsa Omar, 37, from Moss Side, Manchester, who keeps her community clean and tidy.

What do you do?

I’m founder of the Moss Side Eco Squad (@moss_side_eco). A volunteer group that picks up litter where we live.

How did it start?

On maternity leave, walking around with my baby in the pram, I noticed all the litter I had to dodge around. So, I thought, why not clear it up myself?

Advertisement

What next?

People approached me wanting to help. They just needed someone to organise them. So, I put a time on Facebook and seven or eight people turned up.

How did you fund equipment?

Ask Metro


Use AI to go deeper into the stories you care about – powered by Metro and trusted publications.

Advertisement

For my birthday, I asked for litter pick sticks and gloves instead of presents.

Where do you litter pick?

All over Moss Side. It’s given me a familiarity with my community. I’ve discovered cafés, shops and parks that I’d never seen before.

Is the social side fun?

We were strangers, now we’re all really good friends. We check on each other when sick, drop off food if needed and celebrate birthdays.

What’s been the reaction?

People often say thanks. We get offered free food from the takeaway. Or people come out of their house with a cup of tea for us. Locals donate bin bags.

Advertisement

Any tricky moments?

Some people assume we are 
ex-offenders doing community service!

What litter do you see most?

Takeaway wrappers. People chuck it out of car windows. I’ve caught them at it.

What happens then?

I ask, ‘Do you do that at home?’ They usually say sorry.

Any weird finds?

A dried-up stingray fish. No idea where it came from. Oh, and decapitated dolls.

Advertisement

What about dangerous items?

We don’t touch any drug paraphernalia. We report it to the council for disposal.

Do you see fly tipping?

Yes. Lots of landlords rent to students here. So people moving in and out every year and dumping mattresses outside.

How many items do you pick up?

We average two bin bags of rubbish per person – so maybe 20 bags each time. Most of us have family to care for and jobs to go to, so we’re all time-poor.

So there’s no pressure to commit

I’ve dipped in and out since we started in 2020, but other people continued.

Advertisement

Are you really tidy at home?

Yes, but not obsessively. I do love the BBC TV show Sort Your Life Out about helping people declutter. My dream job would be reorganising charity shop floors.

Why do you volunteer?

It gives me asense of belonging in the place where I live. I’ve moved around my whole life. This is the first place that really feels like home.

Any hobbies?

Swimming. I help organise the Junior Parkrun in Moss Side every Sunday for kids. And I take part in the adult run.

Become a litter hero for your area with keepbritaintidy.org

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Cambridgeshire Iceland supermarket remains closed after roof collapses

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

No one was injured after the roof collapsed

A supermarket remains closed after its roof partially collapsed. Emergency services were called to Iceland in High Street, March, just before 3pm on Tuesday (July 28).

Advertisement

The supermarket’s roof had collapsed. No one was injured, but a cordon was put in place and the building next door was evacuated as a precaution.

The store closed on Tuesday and remains closed on Wednesday (July 29). An Iceland spokesperson said: “We are currently working with Cambridgeshire Police and Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue Service following a roof collapse at our High Street store in March, Cambridgeshire. All colleagues and customers are safe, and the store remains closed as a precaution.”

Cambridgeshire Police assisted with the cordon on Tuesday. Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue also assisted the police.

A fire spokesperson said: “A crew from Chatteris was called just before 3pm yesterday to assist police colleagues at an incident on High Street in March. Firefighters helped to make the area safe and returned to their station by 8.35pm.”

Advertisement

Fenland District Council has been contacted for more information.

Do you want more of the latest Cambridgeshire news as it comes in from across the county? Sign up to our dedicated newsletter to make sure you never miss a big story from Cambridge or anywhere else in the county. You can also sign up to our dedicated Traffic and Crime newsletters for the latest updates on the topics you are most interested in.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Transfer news LIVE: Arsenal FC get Vinicius Jr hope, Guimaraes update; Chelsea medical; Man Utd, Liverpool latest

Published

on

Transfer news LIVE: Arsenal FC get Vinicius Jr hope, Guimaraes update; Chelsea medical; Man Utd, Liverpool latest

The summer window is getting very busy as Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester United, Liverpool and Tottenham all continue to chase some major signings. Arsenal may have been offered new hope in their ambitious pursuit of Vinicius Jr, though Real Madrid do not want to sell. The Gunners appear to have finally made a breakthrough over Bruno Guimaraes and have reportedly opened talks over Ivan Fresneda as they close in on another wonderkid in Axel Donczew, with Julian Alvarez also still on their radar.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Ruben Amorim’s honest answer on Manchester United came too late – ‘Mistakes’

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

AC Milan’s head coach Ruben Amorim has spoken honestly about what went wrong during his Man Utd tenure.

“Football is a game of mistakes. Whoever makes the fewest mistakes wins,” Johan Cruyff famously once said.

Advertisement

Managers are responsible for telling players how to play, so mistakes can be made before the referee blows for kick-off on a matchday.

Ruben Amorim made mistakes during his time at Manchester United, but the error that led to his downfall was his stubbornness and unwavering belief that his 3-4-3 system was the only way.

Amorim may have seen the light after six months of reflection following his sacking in January. He was appointed by AC Milan last month, and a recent interview suggests he recognises his shortcomings.

“They [Milan] appointed me because they felt I was the right guy for the way I want to play,” Amorim told Sky Italia. “They want to play the same way, but I think they signed me not just for my success, but also for my experience with a top club like Manchester United and the reflections I shared in our meetings with Mr Cardinale [Milan’s owner].

“They understood that I was prepared for this job, not just because of my past success, but also because of my failures. I think it helped a lot in those meetings.”

When asked what went wrong at United, Amorim said: “The first thing is that it doesn’t matter anymore. That is the feeling. There’s a history, then something happens, the context changes, and you focus on the next challenge.

“I learned a lot. It would be hard to point to one thing, but the important thing that I clearly know is that I made a lot of mistakes. When you do this kind of reflection, and you understand that it was not just their fault, but also my fault, I think you can be a better coach and a better man.”

Advertisement

Amorim’s answer was an honest admission that he was partly responsible for his tenure at United being a failure, although the response is open to interpretation about which particular mistakes he concedes.

Stubbornness was the biggest error. Amorim faced internal pressure to tweak his system in December, and he played with a back four in the win against Newcastle before reverting to 3-4-3 against Wolves at the end of that month.

Amorim felt undermined, suggesting the likes of Thomas Tuchel, Antonio Conte, and Jose Mourinho would not put up with being told how to coach, but it was obvious that he needed to tweak the formation.

Advertisement

Those changes of events led to his outburst at the end of his post-Leeds press conference at Elland Road. The tension with the board had reached a point of no return, and Amorim was dismissed, which club figures believed he wanted. A few days later, Amorim was pictured smiling with his wife outside their Cheshire home.

Whether or not Amorim has learned from the formation debacle at United will only be revealed when he encounters a rough patch at Milan. His United stint should have taught him that adaptability is not a weakness.

Amorim made other mistakes in Manchester that he should have reflected on during his time out of the game. He formed an opinion on Kobbie Mainoo from an early stage and didn’t back down from it.

He was brilliant in press conferences for journalists, but his honesty wasn’t beneficial for players who needed protecting. His handling of academy players, who he hung out to dry to the media, was also perplexing.

Advertisement

Milan released a video on social media of Amorim giving a speech to his new set of players following his appointment, and someone joked that the young players in the shot should pack their bags and leave before it’s too late.

However, there are still some positives to take from Amorim’s time at Old Trafford, and he deserves praise for improving the culture at Carrington by not being afraid to get rid of some big names (and big egos).

Amorim is guaranteed to be a better coach due to the experience he gained at United, but that is the reason he failed. United is not a club where you can learn on the job.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Why Raspberries And Blueberries Have Black Sheets In Their Trays

Published

on

Why Raspberries Have Black Sheets But Strawberries Don't

It’s amazing how much of everyday life I didn’t question for years – like what “wi-fi” really means, where we get paprika from, and what ASDA actually stands for.

And opening my fridge this afternoon, another banal mystery confronted me. What’s that squidgy black mat at the bottom of raspberry trays for, and why isn’t it in the bottom of my strawberry tray?

It seems I’m not alone. Posting to r/NoStupidQuestions, Redditor u/GrumpyOldSophon asked about the addition, wondering why you “never find this in packages of blueberries or strawberries”.

The sheet is absorbent, but it may have other qualities

Advertisement

It probably won’t shock you to learn that the sheet is there to absorb some moisture. Packaging specialists Packaging World described these sheets as “dual ply absorbent” material, “applied to a totally absorbent, yet sealed, topcoat”.

They’re designed for softer fruits, like raspberries and blueberries, as these aren’t as hardy as, e.g., strawberries or grapes. Speaking to Eating Well, Robert Schueller, a produce expert at Melissa’s Produce, said: “A raspberry is one of the most delicate fruits out there, so they have to be packaged very carefully”.

They provide some cushioning for the delicate fruits as they’re transported, too. And because they wick away moisture, they can help to prevent mould.

It makes sense for it to be black or red as it’s designed to catch berry juices, which would otherwise stain it.

Advertisement

Though there may be another, unexpected benefit here: pitching their black cartonboard packaging for strawberries, MM Karton said: “The contrast of black cartonboard and red strawberries is a real eye-catcher at the point of sale”.

Perhaps the red berry/black sheet colour combo makes our raspberries look more inviting, too.

That’s also why raspberries are packed into smaller containers

I have enjoyed many a mega-size box of strawberries this year.

Advertisement

But it turns out retailers aren’t being stingy for limiting their raspberry carton sizes; the berries are too delicate to be stacked on top of each other, unlike strawberries and even blueberries.

And, Schueller added, “you need to allow space for air in each package, too”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

FA ‘deeply concerned’ after being left in the dark over FIFA’s controversial proposal to sell the World Cup – as UEFA ‘threaten to boycott the tournament’

Published

on

The FA have deep concerns over FIFA's leaked plans to sell stakes in the World Cup

FIFA are attempting to pressure their 211 member associations into backing plans to sell stakes in the World Cup – just hours after the FA voiced deep concerns over Gianni Infantino’s divisive proposals.

News broke on Tuesday that FIFA boss Infantino was considering selling parts of the tournament to private investors and forming a new company in a deal that could be worth around £15billion, which the governing body later confirmed in a hastily-issued statement.

In a letter to the associations, Infantino says member nations must decide on the proposal by September 19 and explains the financial benefits of approving the project.

He says that a funding package around £35.5million per nation will become available if associations sign up, but if they reject it their earnings will be almost 75 per cent less.

Advertisement

The letter from Infantino says: ‘The decision on whether or not to proceed with this proposal belongs entirely to you. Should you wish to proceed this $10billion package will become available as of January 1, 2027, ushering in the next phase of our journey together.

‘Should you wish to retain the status quo and reject this proposal we still have our planned expansion of the Forward programme [development money] of $2.7billion as previously presented.

‘In total for the upcoming cycle starting as of January 1, 2027 each member association will have the possibility of access up to $40million per member association under this proposal.’

Advertisement

The FA have deep concerns over FIFA’s leaked plans to sell stakes in the World Cup

The report added that Infantino could become the commissioner of that company once his role at FIFA ends in 2031, although FIFA claim that has not been discussed.

Investment bank J.P. Morgan is FIFA’s financial advisor on the project while Joshua Kushner’s Thrive Capital is expected to lead the proposed investor group. Kushner is the brother of Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared. The Trump administration is understood to have been consulted.

FIFA hope to raise more than £3 billion for the venture from a diversified, global investor group. The group is thought to include sovereign wealth funds.

Advertisement

Should their plans be successful, FIFA intend to give each of their 211 member associations a stake in the company – which they can choose to keep or sell – worth £15million each.

The FA, meanwhile, have deep concerns over FIFA’s leaked plans to sell stakes in the World Cup.

In a statement, an FA spokesperson confirmed they had been left in the dark over the controversial proposals which have sparked outrage amongst the football community.

The statement said: ‘We were completely unaware of this proposal and have no substantive details, including what the proposition actually is, and what conditions are attached.

Advertisement

‘Based on the limited information, we are deeply concerned about the lack of process and governance to get to this point, and the apparent substance and principles involved.

‘When the proposal is shared in the full and transparent way now promised by FIFA, we will make our views clear, and comment further.’

European Football Clubs, who represent over 800 European clubs, have also voiced their opposition. Crucially, the body is chaired by PSG President Nasser Al-Khelaifi and Qatar Sports Investments, who are owned by the Qatari state. Al-Khelaifi has been touted as a potential leadership challenger to Infantino. 

‘European Football Clubs (EFC) notes with serious concern the sudden, unilateral media briefings and announcement by FIFA about a potential new corporate structure for the commercialisation of certain football competitions,’ the statement read.

Advertisement

‘As an institution that represents over 850 football clubs – whose member clubs, their players and communities are fundamental participants in football worldwide, not least in FIFA’s competitions including all the international club competitions – it would be wholly appropriate for EFC to be fully consulted on a proposal of such magnitude. EFC learned about this proposal in the same way as most global football stakeholders – without warning and through the media.

‘EFC always seeks to work collaboratively and supportively with all stakeholders – FIFA, UEFA and all confederations, national associations, leagues, player and fan associations. In that vein, we urge for calm and thorough consultation on all topics affecting the football ecosystem, together with more rigorous and transparent governance processes put in place to protect the game for the long term. Only in this way can we build the right institutional frameworks and relationships required to promote the true success, stability and sustainability of football.’

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has also voiced opposition to the proposition.

‘Let me say this very directly,’ Burnham posted on X. ‘Football does not belong to investors. It belongs to the people who fill the stands and who stand on the touchline week in, week out, rain or shine.

Advertisement

‘The World Cup is not a product. It is the greatest competition in world sport, and it was never anyone’s to sell.

‘Dress the deal up however you like. Once you have sold a piece of it, you have sold out. Football belongs to the fans. It always has, and it always will.’

The plans would see FIFA set up by FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), a new company responsible for the ‘operational delivery of FIFA tournaments’ – including both the men’s and women’s World Cup.

FIFA claim their plans would help advance the FIFA Forward development programme, which distributes capital to member associations. The governing body hopes to increase funding from £6m to £15m for the 2027-30 international cycle.

Advertisement

FIFA would need approval from the FIFA Council and majority support from the FIFA Congress (the 211 member associations) to launch the new enterprise.

UEFA have already opposed the plans, while Concacaf and now the FA have raised concerns about the lack of consultation.

There are major concerns over what the proposals could mean for the game, including whether FIFA could increase the frequency of tournaments to create more opportunities for financial backers to see a return on their investment.

The Club World Cup and men’s World Cup are currently held every four years. FIFA have previously explored the possibility of staging both tournaments every two years.

Advertisement

FIFA maintain that they have a duty to control the development of this project, with external investors holding only a minority stake in FFE and having no operational role.

‘Concacaf was only made aware of this matter through media reports and, subsequently, via a media release,’ their statement read on Wednesday morning.

‘We are deeply concerned by the lack of due process.

‘We share the disappointment of many within our region and the game that this level of detail has been designed and shared publicly before any discussion with the relevant governance bodies and stakeholders has taken place.

Advertisement

‘As leaders within football, we are the custodians of the game. Collectively, FIFA, the Confederations and every Member Association have a responsibility to always act in the best interests of the sport. Every decision we make must be guided by good governance, robust processes and long-term stewardship.

‘This is the framework within which Concacaf operates. We trust that all within the FIFA family will act in the same manner.’

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Drought declared across Cambridgeshire after very low rainfall and hot weather

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

The chair of the National Drought Group said water is being used faster than it can be replenished

Cambridgeshire is officially in drought, according to the Environment Agency. Seven regions across the country, including East Anglia, have been declared as being in drought.

Advertisement

They are East Anglia; Hertfordshire and London; Thames Valley; Hampshire and the Isle of Wight; Devon and Cornwall; the West Midlands; and Wessex. It follows record low rain and high temperatures.

The fourth heatwave of the year is set to peak on Wednesday (July 29) with temperatures of up to 35C, as experts warn wildfires could be “exceptionally severe”. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has issued an amber heat-health alert for the East Midlands, the East, South East and London.

Helen Wakeham, director of water at the Environment Agency and chair of the National Drought Group, said: “The hot and dry weather means we are currently using water faster than nature can replenish it.”

A Met Office assessment showed fires could be exceptionally severe by Wednesday if they start in parts of London, the South East, and eastern England, as a result of the hot, dry conditions.

Advertisement

Fire and rescue services in England and Wales have responded to 706 wildfires so far in 2026, with 208 incidents recorded between July 16 and 28 alone, the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) said.

It added that the latest figures, which do not account for wildfires across the rest of the UK such as a major wildfire in the Cairngorms in Scotland, show “how quickly wildfire activity can increase during prolonged periods of hot and dry weather”.

Fire chiefs warned that wildfire risk “remains elevated across the UK”, with the NFCC adding there were “currently eight live wildfire incidents being monitored through national reporting systems”.

Wildfire numbers in England and Wales remain below the 788 recorded by the same point last year. However, fire chiefs warned “continued dry conditions, combined with warmer temperatures and harvesting activity in many rural areas”, were creating conditions in which fires can start and spread rapidly.

Advertisement

The NFCC said UK wildfires are typically smaller and different in nature to those seen in southern Europe, adding, however, that the “long-term effects of climate change are increasing the likelihood of larger, more complex and more resource-intensive wildfire incidents occurring”.

Phil Garrigan, chairman of the NFCC, said: “More than 200 wildfires in just 12 days shows how quickly the risk can escalate when hot, dry conditions take hold. The scenes we’re seeing across parts of Europe are a stark reminder of what a changing climate means for fire and rescue services.

“We are not seeing fires of that scale in the UK today, but the science tells us we should expect larger, more frequent and more complex wildfires in the future. That’s why we need continued investment in specialist wildfire capabilities, including aerial firefighting support, so we’re prepared for the risks ahead.

“But prevention remains our strongest defence. Most wildfires are avoidable, and we’re asking everyone to take extra care during the hot weather to help keep their communities safe.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

British Touring Shakespeare Bring His Greatest Love Story to Hampshire's Historic “Jane Austen” House

Published

on

British Touring Shakespeare Bring His Greatest Love Story to Hampshire's Historic “Jane Austen” House

Internationally acclaimed theatre company British Touring Shakespeare will bring William Shakespeare’s timeless romance Romeo and Juliet to the beautiful gardens of historic Chawton House in Hampshire known for its association with Jane Austen, on Friday 7th August at 6:00 PM, as part of their 2026 summer UK tour.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Tottenham vs Sydney FC LIVE: Pre-season friendly result, latest updates and fan reaction

Published

on

Tottenham vs Sydney FC LIVE: Pre-season friendly result, latest updates and fan reaction

This will technically be the third friendly Spurs have played this summer, having also beaten Milton Keynes in a behind-closed-doors affair before they flew across the world. Tottenham face Chelsea on Saturday but first take on the team who finished fourth in the Australian A-League last term, and they will play in front of a sell-out Allianz Stadium crowd in New South Wales.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Why Do People Keep Pooping Themselves At Concerts?

Published

on

Why Do People Keep Pooping Themselves At Concerts?

Look, I understand that an hours-long show can be tough on the bladder. We’ve written before at HuffPost UK about the many tricks artists use if they have to “go” mid-performance.

But the fecal fiascos that have taken place in recent concerts are a different beast entirely.

First, Olivia Rodrigo told KISS Radio that she could smell her fans’ nappies from the stage.

“Everyone is wearing diapers… they sit there all day,” she shared. “I think about it kind of often… It’s a real thing.

Advertisement

Noah Kahan, meanwhile, took to X after a woman reportedly defecated near the singer’s stage. “If you have to poop at a show please dear god just go to the bathroom lmao,” he wrote.

At later gigs, he made fans “solemnly swear I will not shit my pants. And if I do, I won’t take it from my pants and put it on the floor”, and beseeched his soiling-inclined fans to “fucking put some diapers on next time”.

On Monday 27 July, meanwhile, a Devilskin metal concert was derailed by an attendee’s baffling and “vomit”-inducing decision to crap in a moshpit.

Advertisement

What, I beg my fellow grown adults, is going on?

I mean, in the case of Rodrigo, there’s at least a vile logic to the odorous decision. “I have been to certain concerts and certain festivals where people wear diapers so that they can be front row of the show,” she explained.

“And that’s been an experience as a performer that I have… smelled.”

It’s not something I think someone who has probably filed their own taxes and may even share an office loo should ever voluntarily do, to be clear.

Advertisement

However, I guess that’s what commitment looks like to some superfans – Noah himself joked(?), “I shit myself onstage in Charlottesville, but that’s because I am dedicated to my craft.”

What “craft” is refined or gig-going fantasy realised by a mid-show floor poop, though?

Please, for the love of music: can we keep that extra fetid “o” out of “pop concerts” going forwards?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025