As The Moon moves into Gemini, passing bubbly Uranus, the energy shifts towards whimsy and play. You will crave some kind of excitement.

Aquarius, Sagittarius and Scoprio, tap into your most genuine connections today. Friendships and bonds will blossom beautifully.

While this placement is fun, sincerity is also key. Listen to what you are drawn to, beneath the surface.

Ahead, you’ll find all star signs’ horoscopes for today: Thursday September 3, 2026.

Like checking your horoscope every morning? You can now sign up to our free daily newsletter to get a personalised reading for your star sign delivered straight to your inbox.

To order your unique personal horoscope based on your time, date and place of birth, visit patrickarundell.com.

Aries

March 21 to April 20

The Moon dances into Gemini and passes the electric, intuitive energies of Uranus. If things have felt laden, a spark of excitement takes hold, and you can enjoy a buzzy conversation, write a witty post, or come up with a fantastic brainwave. What today will not be is dull, or particularly predictable, so expect plenty of changes of mind and find it harder to focus.

Head here for everything you need to know about being an Aries

Taurus

April 21 to May 21

It may have felt that one person, or people you know, have been resistant to you raising an issue which is important to you. And every time you have tried to share this, their deflection or subtle disapproval has blocked your flow. Today, you may decide to say it out loud and say it quickly. Rightly, the more you feel that they’re deflecting you, the more they will hear you.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Taurus

Gemini

May 22 to June 21

You are not a slouch when it comes to flashes of insight, and they can get stronger as the day goes on. This can give you some very perceptive new angles on anything you have been grappling with and also encourage you to step away from any demands that are too cloying. If you naturally enjoy your own space, this part of your nature can be all the stronger.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Gemini

Cancer

June 22 to July 23

Yours is a sign governed very much by intuition, and today, your sixth sense can be buzzing brightly away, but not perhaps in the way you expect it to. What can influence things is memories, experiences or even people, which can suddenly pop up in your thoughts. Some of these may be surprising, but if someone does come to mind, it could intrigue you as to why.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Cancer

Leo

July 24 to August 23

So, what you got planned for the upcoming weekend Leo? You could find yourself yearning to do something completely different, and with someone completely different. And somewhere else, someone feels the same. Look to break your usual weekly patterns and reach out to connect. It may be the first time for a while, or the first time of all, but will add spice.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Leo

Virgo

August 24 to September 23

Resisting change around work and worldly interactions may prove hard to resist just now. Just know you can drive the change as much as have it imposed on you. Today is a point in case. What may have seemed daunting can now seem like a genuine opportunity to seize the moment. If you’ve ever considered self-employment, it can become even more attractive.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Virgo

Libra

September 24 to October 23

Even if you have set routines that you enjoy, like many of us do, breaking free of these and being more spontaneous can be like a breath of fresh air. Be it in the route to work, the meals you choose or what you watch online, changing things up can reinvigorate you. That said, if you do feel unable to do this, you may find it harder to concentrate on the job in hand.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Libra

Scorpio

October 24 to November 22

You have a superb knack of instinctively sensing what might not be genuine and sincere. Today something can come up which illustrates this. Others might not spot what you do, and whether it’s a brilliant business opportunity, or someone being economical with the truth, you can arrow in fast. You just may need to marshal your frustration if others are slow to catch on.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Scorpio

Sagittarius

November 23 to December 21

We all have relationships, even if we are not currently in a close personal one. And this area of your situation has been given extra celestial zest since late April. But this may have made you restless. The upside of this is if you have broken away from a friend, associate or partner, it’s because it had grown stale. Conversely, who you meet now can bring a new spark.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Sagittarius

Capricorn

December 22 to January 21

You are one of the most industrious members of the zodiac, Capricorn, and part of your secret is your ability to be very disciplined in attending to tasks. Today, however, all that is routine can seem really quite dull, but the upside is that this can get you thinking about how you can freshen things up. New approaches could make things work more efficiently and fun too.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Capricorn

Aquarius

January 22 to February 19

Aquarius is co-ruled by two planets. Steady Saturn gives you your appreciation of long-standing friendships. Uranus gives you your ability to spot trends in fashion and music but also see have quick changes of mood. Today that quirkier part of your nature can shine out, but so can your uniqueness. People can be drawn to you because you are so bright and different.

Head here for everything you need to know about being an Aquarius

Pisces

February 20 to March 20

When was the last time you decluttered, Pisces? If it hasn’t been for a while, today would be an opportune time to do precisely this. And even items that hold sentimental value could be under review as an out-with-the-old, in-with-the-new vibe shapes up. Likewise, if you feel a change of scenery would be good for you, you can make the moves to make this happen.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Pisces

Your daily Metro.co.uk horoscope is here every morning, seven days a week (yes, including weekends!). To check your forecast, head to our dedicated horoscopes page.

Head here for this week’s tarot horoscope reading, and see what the cards have in store for you!

Check out the tarot horoscope reading for the month of September here.

Prefer us to the others? Then tell Google!

As a loyal Metro reader, we want to make sure you never miss our stories when searching for your news. Whether it is the latest politics news explained, live football coverage or a showbiz scoop.

Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.

Add us as a Preferred Source

Advertisement

MORE: Daily horoscope September 2, 2026: Today’s predictions for your star sign

MORE: Daily horoscope September 1, 2026: Today’s predictions for your star sign

MORE: Daily horoscope August 31, 2026: Today’s predictions for your star sign

A 64-year-old man died in hospital after he was found injured at a property in Fauldhouse.

A man has been arrested and charged in connection with a death in a West Lothian village earlier this year.

Police were called to a property on Quarry Road in Fauldhouse at around 10.20am on Tuesday, February 3, after reports that a 64-year-old man had been found injured. Emergency services attended and the man was taken to hospital where he later died.

Seven months on, a 60-year-old man has now been arrested and charged in connection with his death. He is due to appear at Livingston Sheriff Court on Thursday, September 3.

A Police Scotland spokesperson said: “A 60-year-old man has been arrested and charged in connection with the death of a 64-year-old man in Fauldhouse, West Lothian. Around 10.20am on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, police were made aware of a man found injured at a property on Quarry Road.

“Emergency services attended and the 64-year-old was taken to hospital where he later died. The 60-year-old is due to appear at Livingston Sheriff Court on Thursday, September 3.”

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE.

For Andy Burnham, walking into the bear pit that is Prime Minister’s Questions, it must have been hard to stay calm. His audience was a room of closely packed MPs, some hostile, some friendly – all very loud – many wanting to make a mark.

And the full audience for PMQs extends far beyond the MPs in the chamber. Prime ministers are thinking about the media, external groups, foreign governments, voters and financial markets. The reactions of any of these matter. The PM has the dual worry of dealing with opposition questions while also demonstrating his or her worth to the party members sitting behind them. Backbenchers can signal a lack of confidence through quietness or just not turning up.

It is no wonder that preparing for PMQs is, in itself, demanding. Alastair Campbell, who advised Tony Blair when he was opposition leader and in the early days of the New Labour government, is clear about just what it took. Preparation can take hours. Nerves don’t disappear. And it doesn’t appear to have got any easier in recent years.

Burnham is, of course, new to this. And unlike many in his position, he hasn’t had a chance to rehearse as opposition leader. He was wise to spend part of Tuesday’s return to parliament on a statement and a lengthy question-and-answer session. It gave him a warm-up for the main event.

After Keir Starmer was ousted as prime minister, Labour MPs will be willing Burnham to show that he can succeed. So how did he do in his first PMQs, and what can we glean from it?

Restraint?

This was not a “full-blooded” PMQs. Burham chose not to mount attacks where others might have. A question from Reform UK’s Danny Kruger, for example, could have led to a reply focusing on the party’s reported problems. That it did not, may mean Burnham wants to move away from such attacks – or that he considers Reform less significant than it has been in recent years.

Burnham’s jibes at the Conservatives were not fierce either. He merely criticised past statements made by Tory leader Kemi Badenoch and her shadow cabinet and sought to associate them with the economic failings of past governments. Prime Minister’s Questions is an adversarial event and it will be worth watching whether more obvious hostilities develop in future.

Sharper exchanges in turn end up generating sharper questions, so PMQs could move from point-scoring debate to abusive exchange. But Burnham may have some way to go to match David Cameron, who was identified by researchers as the rudest prime minister at PMQs.

At length

Speaker Lindsay Hoyle warned that Burnham’s long answers may cause the session to overrun. Burnham clearly wanted to spend time on each answer, but this can be a blessing and a curse for a PM. Longer answers mean you can say everything you want. But sometimes the short, sharp reply is most effective at putting your opponent off their stride. The prime minister may have to learn brevity.

Moving on

One of the tricks of dealing with difficult subjects is the “bridge”. That is, taking the topic and linking to something else that you actually do want to talk about. Burnham showed some ability here, linking at one point from a question about public spending to the needs of young people not in education, employment or training (Neets).

His bridge from the Bayeux Tapestry and French president Emmanuel Macron to small boat crossings didn’t work, however. He is clearly a bit rusty in the use of this technique.

Are you listening?

Badenoch was keen to paint the PM as someone who won’t answer questions about spending, and as such as a PM who leans towards more tax and more spend. This may be the beginning of a strategy to frame him as vague and unwilling to commit to specific action in the face of obvious problems. Once an idea like this takes root, it is very hard to shift.

But neither Badenoch nor Burnham has the proper measure of the other yet, and it will take a few more outings before there is a sense of how successful this strategy may prove.

The right man for the job?

As Burnham did not ascend to Downing Street immediately after a run of other roles in parliament, or after a general election, he needed to make his experience clear. He name-checked things he had achieved or initiated, specifically in Greater Manchester, as a way of underlining his credentials.

These references, plus the use of “I”, were designed to demonstrate his ability to get things done, rather like the way it is used in job interviews. Using “I” instead of “my government” or “we” also demonstrates engagement with the topic.

Play nicely

During some replies, Burnham touched on cross-party working, and made an on-the-spot pledge to meet Cornish MPs (not all of whom are Labour) for talks. Offering cross-party working can remove the sting from an attack and make the prime minister seem reasonable. This appears to be a feature of Burnham’s approach and it will be interesting to see if it develops into genuine cooperation with at least some other parties.

Prime ministers often say they want to change aspects of PMQs. Burnham himself has indicated that he wants a different, less Punch-and-Judy tone. Back in 1997, Tony Blair made the move from two shorter sessions a week to one longer one. Blair said he wanted a more considered approach, with more questions and more answers. Whether prime ministers get what they want, of course, is not entirely down to them. They may get the last word, but they don’t control the cast.

Multiple victims, including two police officers, have been involved in a shooting in downtown Minneapolis, according to city officials.

Minneapolis police rushed to the Loring Park neighborhood Wednesday afternoon in response to the shooting as city officials warned people on social media to avoid the area.

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz said his public safety team was also responding to the shooting.

“State officials are on the ground to support local law enforcement and we will share more information as it becomes available,” the Democrat wrote on X Wednesday evening.

In a follow-up post, Walz said he was “grateful to law enforcement actively working to ensure the safety of our neighbors in Downtown Minneapolis this afternoon.

“Minnesota is praying for our first responders.”

This is a developing story…

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their children returned to the UK in August

Advertisement

Donald Trump reveals ‘what he would have done’ in reaction to Harry and Meghan’s return to the UK. The president believes the couple had treated the monarchy with “great disrespect” and if he was in the royal family he “would not have taken them back”.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, returned to the UK last week to begin a new life after six years living in the US. The family is said to be settling in the UK for an “extended period” of time amid speculation as to how long they will stay and where they will live.

The Cotswolds being suggested as the most likely destination.

Asked in the White House about his reaction to the departure from the US of Harry and Meghan, Mr Trump said: “I’m happy about it. I was not a fan.”

He added: “I had a very good relationship with the Queen. Really good. I got to know her very well.

Advertisement

“A really good relationship with King Charles. I knew him as Prince Charles and King Charles. I’ve known him for a long time. He’s great, great guy.

“And I thought they treated the royal family with great disrespect. I didn’t like it.

“I didn’t like the way she acted. I thought she was terribly disrespectful to the Queen, to King Charles.

“I wouldn’t have taken them back. If I were in the royal family I would not have taken him back.”

Harry and Meghan, who are remaining as non-working royals, quit the monarchy six years ago, relocating to the US from where they criticised members of the royal family and the institution.

The Sussexes’ dramatic U-turn was revealed last month, but the pair have yet to speak publicly about their plans.

Many questions remain unanswered, including whether taxpayers will foot the bill for their security.

Harry, a former soldier who served in Afghanistan, wrote to Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood last month asking her to take a personal role in determining if his family receive close police protection.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham would previously not be drawn on Harry and Meghan’s security arrangements in the UK, saying the funding for it was a “private matter”.

Harry had insisted it was too dangerous to bring his wife and children to the UK with the security he was entitled to post-Megxit.

It is understood there have been at least six threats or plots concerning the duke from the Taliban, al Qaida or their supporters since 2007.

Last year, he lost a legal battle against the Home Office over the security arrangements for him and his family while in the UK, after his level of protection changed when he stopped being a working royal.

Harry has argued he faces a greater risk than his late mother, with “additional layers of racism and extremism”.

Ensure our latest stories always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

By JUSTIN ENRIQUEZ, US ASSISTANT SHOWBIZ EDITOR

Published: 19:50 BST, 2 September 2026 | Updated: 23:28 BST, 2 September 2026

Andrew Garfield once advocated for a gay Spider-Man and 13 years later, he still believes that the comic superhero could ‘like boys.’

The British actor doubled down on his theory that the Marvel character is an inclusive one.

‘I just still believe that anyone can be in that suit,’ he said in an interview with Entertainment Weekly.

‘That’s the point of why it’s such a kind of universally beloved character…. because you don’t see skin color, you don’t see gender, you don’t see sexuality. Anyone can project themselves into that suit,’ he explained.

Advertisement

Garfield, 43, played the role of Peter Parker and his alter-ego in 2012’s The Amazing Spider-Man and again in the 2014 sequel.

The success of the movies catapulted him into the top tier of actors in demand in Hollywood. 

Andrew Garfield is standing by his 2013 call for a gay Spider-Man saying that he still believes the Marvel superhero is beloved by fans because he is an inclusive character. Above, in July

Advertisement

‘I just still believe that anyone can be in that suit,’ he told Entertainment Weekly. ‘Because you don’t see skin color, you don’t see gender, you don’t see sexuality.’ Above, Garfield in The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in 2017

He characterized his initial call for a gay Spider-Man in 2013 as ‘an exercise in rebellion’ and said he ‘felt passionate about it’ at the time. 

‘I like the idea of a place where everyone is being honored and everyone is being included, and it was just a kind of act of saying, ‘Well, why not?’ And you’ll be telling on yourself if you have a strong opinion either way,’ he said.

Garfield, who is currently promoting his new historical drama The Uprising, left the Spider-Man franchise when Marvel re-booted it to align with their slate of Avengers movies and cast Tom Holland in the role.

Advertisement

Back in 2013, he revealed to Entertainment Weekly that he’d gone so far as to have a discussion with The Amazing Spider-Man producer Matt Tolmach about gender-swapping Peter Parker’s love-interest Mary-Jane.

‘Why can’t we discover that Peter is exploring his sexuality?’ he told the publication at the time.

‘It’s hardly even groundbreaking! … So why can’t he be gay? Why can’t he be into boys?’

Back in 2013, he revealed he’d gone so far as to have a discussion with The Amazing Spider-Man producer Matt Tolmach about gender-swapping Peter Parker’s love-interest Mary-Jane. Above, with co-star Emma Stone in Paris in 2014

Advertisement

‘Why can’t we discover that Peter is exploring his sexuality?’ he told EW at the time. ‘It’s hardly even groundbreaking! … So why can’t he be gay? Why can’t he be into boys?’

He even suggested that his replacement as the superhero in a queer Spider-Man movie could be then rising star Michael B Jordan who found fame on TV series The Wire.

‘He’s so charismatic and talented. It’d be even better—we’d have interracial bisexuality!’ Garfield mused.

While he cast his final web in a Spidey movie 12 years ago, he did get the chance to wear the web-themed suit one more time in 2021’s Spider-Man: No Way Home.

Advertisement

He and previous Spider-Man star Tobey Maguire teamed up with Holland in the MCU’s third movie in which the multiverse is broken open and characters from alternate realities arrive in Pater Parker’s universe. 

Garfield is currently promoting his new historical drama The Uprising which opens in theaters on September 10

In 2023, Holland revealed that the trio had maintained contact since filming that reunion he’s in a special group chat with Garfield and Maguire ever since they all played Peter Parker together in the 2021 multi-verse flick.

‘We have this amazing bond as three people who have been through something that is so unique that we really are like brothers,’ the 29-year-old Englishman gushed to THR Magazine.

Advertisement

‘We have a great group chat and we catch up every now and then. It’s called the Spider-Boys.’

You know what’s fun? Tight games of football with a couple of nice goals.

Interspersed with plenty of creative passages of play until the team you support wins and you go for a lovely pint. Or, actually, battering the other lot 5-1, who cares about the quality then?

You know what’s not? Contracts, painstaking negations to make the rich richer, sub-clauses, arithmetic.

The transfer window is closed. Resources have been moved between Premier League teams and fans of every club are a bit annoyed except, perhaps, Ipswich? (Write in).

One of my friends (big up Tim Spiers at The Athletic) got the unenviable task of ranking (and justifying the rank) of every transfer made into a Premier League club this window. All 155 of them, only half of which, you’ll be amazed to know, have been made by Manchester City and Tottenham.

Tim is largely joking but the point is this fairly arbitrary ranking reflects what fans are trying to do in every argument about transfers across social media and in real life all the time. More to the point, much of this goes on before any signing has even kicked a ball for the club.

The belief you can make this make sense is kind of the point of the transfer window for the fan. It’s not real.

These aren’t real sums of money, the players aren’t real people, you can’t form accurate opinions on it because who knows? The variables are infinite and team chemistry is an art.

This feeling of throwing your hands up and enjoying the ride makes sense as a fan, because the angst you feel has zero impact. You might as well get exercised, have a pop, believe yourself all-knowing, because why not?

But that same energy seems at times to be driving recruitment strategies at our clubs. The summer 2026 obsession has been with the Premier League-proven player. As I’m sure you get, it just means buying a guy from one of the other teams in the league, not anything more significant like actually having proven yourself in the Premier League.

History may report it went like this. Premier League clubs set up scouting departments, bought occasional flops from various other leagues and then thought, okay here’s one way of removing an unknown variable: just buy the players belonging to the clubs with lower resources in the league than you. Call it a reverse-Moneyball, if you will.

Premier League top 10 most-expensive deals this summer

1. Enzo Fernandez – Chelsea to Man City – £125m
2. Morgan Rogers – Aston Villa to Chelsea – £117m
3. Elliot Anderson – Nottingham Forest to Man City – £116m
4. Bradley Barcola – PSG to Liverpool – £106m
5. Sandro Tonali – Newcastle to Tottenham – £92.5m
6. Mateus Fernandes – West Ham to Tottenham – £85m
7. Ayyoub Bouaddi – Lille to Manchester City – £81.4m
8. Bruno Guimaraes – Newcastle to Arsenal – £75m
9. Savinho – Manchester City to Tottenham – £75m
10. Carlos Baleba – Brighton to Manchester United – £70m

And here we are where Enzo Fernandez becomes a £100 million-plus player on two separate occasions. I am old enough to remember when £100m was a fee reserved for once-in-a-generation talents like Kylian Mbappe.

The sums of money involved in all of this are obviously gross. That’s one reason I think I’m sitting here considering them only as units that compare with each other, rather than, say, what the analysts themselves might make at a Premier League club. Or, worse still, people doing real work in hospitals or schools in the UK.

There is one market that can be used to draw useful comparisons, though, without making ourselves sick and that’s with other top-tier leagues in Europe – the Premier League’s competitors for Champions League and Europa League spots.

Newly promoted Hull, who came up by winning the Championship play-off final (so in absolute terms the lowest-ranked team starting this season’s Premier League) spent more money this window than 36-time Italian champions Juventus, current Serie A title holders Inter, Bayern Munich and Atletico Madrid.

Celebratory-sounding posts after the window slammed shut confirmed the top flight had again broken the all-time summer transfer record, with half a billion spent on deadline day alone. This paints the £3.49bn spent as symbolic of us plucky Brits overwhelming the footballing product of other nations with our unparalleled canniness and grit. But, in reality, flooding one corner of European football with money doesn’t seem smart for its future.

Looking at these sums alerted me to something I’d missed. I had spent the last few seasons enjoying the fact smaller English clubs were lately going up against traditional European football superpowers. It felt like an underdog story when Crystal Palace won the Conference League.

But looking at the numbers this window you come to realise it is not.
Nearly all European clubs are now underdogs to anyone in the Premier League and that’s not good news for anyone with a dog in that fight.

For more stories like this, check our sport page.

Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on
Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

MORE: Racing Santander reveal Arsenal attempt to sign Pablo Garcia on deadline day

MORE: Arsenal made approach to sign £73m striker instead of Julian Alvarez before deadline day

MORE: John Terry reveals Chelsea star was left ‘gutted’ by Xabi Alonso transfer decision

A federal judge has blocked Donald Trump’s administration from enforcing his latest executive orders targeting birthright citizenship after the president lost a landmark Supreme Court case challenging his attempt to unilaterally redefine who gets to be a citizen.

Trump signed executive orders last month taking aim at children who were born to employees of foreign governments as well as the children of mothers who are accused of lying about their intentions for visiting the country while pregnant. The orders also seeks to block citizenship to children whose parents are accused of being “alien enemies,” as well as newborns in U.S. territories.

Lawsuits were swiftly filed, including a challenge on behalf of babies who would be deprived citizenship under Trump’s original 2025 order. Lawyers asked a judge to block Trump’s latest orders to ensure their clients would retain their citizenship under the new rules.

Maryland District Judge Deborah Boardman, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, noted that the question before her is not whether Trump’s new “carveouts” to birthright citizenship are constitutional but whether the plaintiffs suing to stop the orders are entitled to protections against it.

“The answer to that question is yes,” she wrote Wednesday. Trump’s latest efforts are “almost certainly unconstitutional” as applied to the Supreme Court’s decision, which has “already decided that the children in the class are citizens at birth,” according to Boardman.

“This Court must, once again, preliminarily enjoin enforcement of the President’s most recent attempt to strip the right to citizenship from them,” she wrote.

The judge stressed that the language in Trump’s latest order does not indicate whether it applies retroactively.

Trump’s initial order indicated that it applied only to children who were born 30 days after it went into effect, or on February 19, 2025.

His latest order, however, “says nothing like that,” according to Boardman.

She argued that “the only fair reading of the plain language” of Trump’s executive order is that it applies to any babies born after February 19, 2025, putting thousands of babies in legal limbo.

The 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause plainly states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

But in an executive order signed on his first day in office, Trump sought to unilaterally redefine that amendment to state that babies born on U.S. soil would be denied citizenship at birth if their mother was “unlawfully present” or had “lawful but temporary” status, and if the father “was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.”

A divided ruling from the nation’s high court in June determined that children born in the U.S. to parents “unlawfully or temporarily present” are indeed “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. and thus citizens at birth.

This is a developing story

One parent claimed multiple children were turned away on their first day

A school has defended its strict uniform policy after pupils were reportedly turned away on their first day of term for wearing skirts that sat “a couple of inches” above the knee.

Parents claimed that students at Denton Community Academy were refused entry on Wednesday despite wearing garments purchased through an approved uniform supplier, according to the Manchester Evening News.

One father, who asked not to be named, said he had spent a “fortune” equipping his two daughters for the new school year, only for them to be denied access to lessons over the length of their skirts.

“They were ringing us saying they weren’t allowed to enter the school. The skirts they had on were not rolled at all and fell a couple of inches above the knee, if that”, one parent, who did not wish to be named, told the M.E.N.

“It was throwing it down with rain and there were 40 or 50 kids standing outside, not allowed in. They were soaking wet and some were crying.”

The father told the publication that other parents also went to collect their children, while his two daughters spent the rest of the day at home and missed their first day back.

Northern Education Trust, which runs Denton Community Academy, defended the decision, adding that parents have been reminded of the uniform expectation several times ahead of the new academic year, describing the policies as being applied “consistently” and “fairly”.

“Denton Community Academy is committed to maintaining the high standards that have driven significant improvements in our students’ educational outcomes”, the trust said.

“The academy is the most improved secondary school in Tameside and is now the highest-performing non-selective secondary school in the borough. We are incredibly proud of our students and the high expectations that have driven this improvement.”

Families were reportedly reminded of the expectations on May 6, May 18, July 16 and August 20, the trust claimed, adding, “We cannot comment on individual cases, but we strongly encourage parents with any concerns to speak directly to the academy.

“We will always work with families to resolve issues, and believe that direct conversation with the school, rather than through the media, is the most constructive way to do that.”

The parent said he had since returned to TopMarks Schoolwear in Ashton, where he claimed the longest skirts available were around 20 inches, which would still not fall below his daughters’ knees.

He also pointed to a photograph in the uniform section of the academy’s website, which he said showed a female pupil wearing a skirt several inches above the knee.

Ensure our latest stories always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

“This is not an army camp. They’re treating them like soldiers, but they are children, they need an education. It feels like punishment.”

Denton Community Academy’s website says its uniform policy is intended to “set an appropriate tone for education”. It says the uniform provides “a sense of belonging and identity for all students”, while also being “comfortable” and allowing pupils to be themselves.

The policy also prohibits make-up, hoodies and jewellery, as well as “writing on hands or arms for any reason”.

It states: “We do not exclude students for wearing jewellery, having mobile phones or any other breaches of this policy. We will, however, always ask students to rectify the issue that we have raised. These are reasonable requests.”

Bill Shiel Dods, who performs a similar role in 2026 to what Stagg was doing in 1944, said it was like “Disneyland” for a forecaster when he worked as an extra on the new movie Pressure, which centres on his predecessor’s advice about the timing of the Normandy Landings.

Mr Shiel Dods said he fully understands the pressure Stagg was under when his advice on the likely weather in the Channel was crucial to General Eisenhower’s decision-making for the invasion.

“Hopefully, I will never be in that situation where I have the fate of thousands and thousands of soldiers and airmen on the line,” he told the Press Association.

Mr Shiel Dods said: “There’s a scene in the film where (Stagg) is briefing the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and (General Bernard) Montgomery says ‘not good enough’, because Montgomery wants to get off and start the invasion as soon as possible and not delay because of weather.

“I’m not going to say I’ve been anywhere near the level of pressure that Stagg was under, but I’ve had to brief aircrew, and they haven’t been always been thrilled with the message I’m passing to them.

“And you do get pushed back as to how confident you are in the forecast, and where could it go wrong.

“Those questions are bread and butter to us, really.”

Mr Shiel Dods has been with the Met Office for more than 40 years, and a forecaster at RAF Leeming, since 1993.

With his team, he provides detailed weather information for the flight crews flying out of the base, near Northallerton, as well as others across the north of England.

Asked what Stagg would have made of the technological differences between 1944 and 2026, Mr Shiel Dods said: “I think his head would have exploded.”

He said the biggest differences are the use of satellite imagery and live radar data.

He said: “The level of detail we have now is head-and-shoulders above.

“I’m sure Stagg would have killed to have this amount of data available to him.”

Read next:

Mr Shiel Dods said: “The technology we use is vastly different, but I think essentially we are doing the same job that my predecessors were doing in World War Two, which is providing advice and support to our military users so they can operate safely and make the most of their often limited resources.”

He is very familiar with what information Stagg was working with 82 years ago, and said that “history’s proved him right”.

“Fortunately, Stagg was right and Eisenhower, in his wisdom, followed the British guidance rather than American because I think, otherwise, it could have been quite a bit poorer for the outcome of the war,” he said.

Mr Shiel Dods has a small part in the movie, as a meteorological assistant working in the office, which came about because he is one of the few forecasters still working who was trained to draw weather charts by hand.

When he first heard they were making it, he told colleagues: “It’d be great if they’re looking for a gin-soaked old forecaster to play a part.”

He said: “And then, quite by chance, a few weeks later, I got a message from one of my colleagues saying they were looking for people with experience of drawing up charts.

“Obviously, when I started in the Met Office in 1984, this was what I was doing on a day-to-day basis.

“So I sent off an email to the production company and said, ‘This is my background. Would you be interested?’, and they got back almost straight away.”

He said he was “blown away” by the set.

Mr Shiel Dods said: “It felt totally authentic.

“I went into the forecast room on the first day, and I knew it was going to be good, but I was blown away by the level of detail.

“It was like Disneyland for a Met forecaster.”

He said: “It was a thrill just to be in the forecast room because it took me back to when I started my career, but also to see Oscar-winning and Bafta-winning actors was quite exciting.”