A developer is hoping to build up to 100 homes in a village near Cambridge
Proposals to build up to 100 homes in a village near Cambridge have been branded as “inappropriate”. Great Shelford Ten Acres LLP has submitted an outline planning application for the residential development of land off Cambridge Road in Great Shelford.
The developer said the plans would deliver a “high-quality residential scheme that responds positively to the surrounding built form and landscape character while addressing identified housing needs within the district”.
Of the new homes, 50 would be made available as affordable housing. The site extends to around 3.98 hectares and is currently in agricultural use.
The homes would comprise a mix of sizes including one, two, three and four bedroom properties. According to the current proposals, the affordable housing would be delivered as a mix of flats and houses including terraced, semi-detached, and detached properties.
The developer said that the delivery of 50 affordable homes would “deliver long-term social and economic benefits to the local community” as well as providing “housing opportunities for households currently unable to access the market”.
Concerns have been raised about whether the development is appropriate. Great Shelford Parish Council has “strongly” objected to the proposals on the grounds of there being “no demonstrable unmet need” for the development.
The parish council also said that bringing construction traffic and other vehicles onto the site “promotes conflict with vulnerable cyclists and students travelling to both Trumpington and Sawston”.
The parish council brought up the worry that the “only” transport link is one bus along the A1301, which goes into Cambridge via Addenbrooke’s Hospital. The council said the site has “very little connectivity by public transport and is therefore wholly dependent on car use”.
Central East Integrated Care Board (CEICB) said the development would be “likely” to have an impact on Shelford Health Centre, adding, “it would appear that they do not have capacity for the additional growth resulting from this development”. To mitigate the impacts, a developer contribution has been suggested by the NHS board.
One local said: “The proposal would permanently remove protected Green Belt land that helps preserve the village’s rural setting, prevents urban sprawl, supports wildlife, and maintains the open character of the area. Once developed, this land cannot be replaced.”
They added: “A scheme of around 100 homes would significantly alter the character of this valued green space which is central to the lives and wellbeing of many local residents.”
A similar concern was raised by another local who said that if the development was given the go-ahead, it would “irreversibly destroy” the Green Belt land. Dozens of other objections have been lodged since its submission in May.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login