The Late Show finale will be a star-studded event with a leaked list of celebrity guests that includes singer Paul McCartney.

Stephen Colbert and his crew tried to keep tonight’s guest appearances under wraps, but some details have been revealed after the show was taped earlier today.

McCartney was one of the guests in the Ed Sullivan Theater today, returning again to the studio where he and the rest of The Beatles performed live in 1964, Deadline has reported.

Other stars include actors Paul Rudd, Bryan Cranston and Ryan Reynolds, according to the outlet. Former Late Show bandleader Jon Batiste also reportedly performed for the finale.

The cancellation of the Emmy-winning comedian’s show was announced last July and came days after Colbert criticized the network’s parent company, Paramount, over a $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump.

Trump’s legal team accused 60 Minutes of deceptively editing a 2024 interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump said he would “have a message at a later date” when asked for his thoughts on the end of Colbert’s show.

After hosting the show for more than a decade, Colbert’s “extended” finale will air at 11:35 p.m. ET Thursday night.

Late Show makes big effort to hide surprise guests for finale

The Late Show has taken the secrecy of tonight’s guests very seriously, with a security tower stationed outside the Ed Sullivan Theater to shield the identity of anyone entering.

The tower at the stage door had heavy curtains and security guards around it, Deadline detailed.

“Whoever you are, we love you!” one fan yelled.

Advertisement

Rachel Dobkin22 May 2026 02:00

Trump’s political rivals shower Stephen Colbert with praise ahead of Late Show finale

President Donald Trump’s political rivals have showered Stephen Colbert with praise ahead of the Late Show finale.

“There aren’t many who can make people think and laugh at the same time. For years, Stephen brought wit, heart, and honesty to late night television,” former President Joe Biden wrote on Instagram.

Advertisement

“America could always count on a laugh — and sometimes a needed reality check. Congrats on an incredible run, my friend,” he added.

Hillary Clinton, Trump’s opponent during the 2016 election, wrote on Instagram, “Alongside his great wit, Stephen brought deep thoughtfulness, empathy, and humility to the late-night stage.”

Rachel Dobkin22 May 2026 01:30

Advertisement

Late Show staffer shares video of Colbert’s warm up act before finale

Paul Mecurio, a comedian at the Late Show, has shared a video of Colbert’s warm up act before the finale.

In the video posted to X, Colbert’s colleagues are seen and heard clapping. Colbert then bangs onto a storage rack backstage, joining in on the beat.

After one final look at his crew, Colbert walks on stage to the taping of tonight’s show.

Advertisement

The live audience can be heard cheering loudly as the host appears from backstage.

Rachel Dobkin22 May 2026 01:00

Stephen Colbert walked on stage to ‘deafening cheers’ during Late Show taping: report

Stephen Colbert walked on stage to “deafening cheers” during the taping of the Late Show finale, according to CNN’s Brian Stelter.

Advertisement

Rachel Dobkin22 May 2026 00:30

Who will be on the Late Show tonight?

The Late Show has decided to keep its finale a surprise to fans.

Viewers won’t know who tonight’s guests will be until they walk out on stage, and the segments have also been under wraps.

Advertisement

There are some guests we could presumably cancel out, including his longtime friend Jon Stewart. The comedian appeared on the show earlier this week.

It’s also unlikely his fellow late night hosts Jimmy Fallon, Jimmy Kimmel, Seth Meyers and John Oliver will appear tonight, since they were on the show last week.

Rachel Dobkin22 May 2026 00:00

Advertisement

Kamala Harris thanks Stephen Colbert for ‘so many memorable conversations’

Former Vice President Kamala Harris has paid tribute to Stephen Colbert’s time on late night TV, thanking him for “so many memorable conversations.”

“Stephen Colbert has a talent for making people laugh and encouraging them to stay curious, stay engaged, and stay hopeful about the world around them,” she wrote on X ahead of his final show.

CBS’ Late Show was canceled days after Colbert criticized the network’s parent company, Paramount, over a $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump.

The settlement was part of a legal dispute in which Trump’s team accused 60 Minutes of deceptively editing a 2024 interview with Harris, his political opponent in the last presidential election.

Advertisement

Rachel Dobkin21 May 2026 23:30

Trump sends Stephen Colbert a warning ahead of final Late Show airing

Donald Trump isn’t letting Stephen Colbert fade into the sunset without having the last word.

The White House also issued its own statement to The Independent, celebrating Colbert’s final show.

Advertisement

Rhian Lubin21 May 2026 23:00

Why was the Late Show canceled?

The network announced the cancellation last July in a statement, describing Colbert as “irreplaceable” and citing a “financial decision.”

“As someone who’s always been a proud employee of this network, I am offended. And I don’t know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company,” the host said. “But just taking a stab at it, I’d say $16 million would help.”

Advertisement

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a frequent Colbert guest, questioned CBS’s motives, demanding that “America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons.”

“CBS canceled Colbert’s show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like bribery,” she suggested on X, alongside a clip of Colbert’s show in which he denounced Paramount’s settlement.

Inga Parkel21 May 2026 22:30

Advertisement

Stars pay tribute to Colbert ahead of final show

The stars have been paying tribute to Stephen Colbert on social media ahead of his final Late Show tonight.

Fellow late-night host Conan O’Brien said Colbert was moving on to “bigger and better things,” while Star Wars actor Mark Hamill thanked him for “decades of laughs.”

Rhian Lubin21 May 2026 22:00

Advertisement

Pictured: Fans line up in the rain ahead of Colbert’s final show

Rhian Lubin21 May 2026 21:30

Can spending more time engaging with the arts, such as visiting galleries, museums, singing or painting, really lead to a longer and healthier life? It’s certainly an appealing idea. And it’s not implausible.

Stress is bad for your health, and spending your free time doing something engaging, like visiting an art gallery, seems like a good way to reduce stress. But there’s a big difference between a plausible idea and an established scientific fact. And if scientists like me want to advise people on how to spend their time, we need to be confident that our advice is based on solid evidence.

A recent study, published in the journal Innovation in Aging, offers a case in point. The study, led by a team of researchers from UCL, reported that those who engaged in arts and cultural activities more often, and in a wider range of such activities, appeared to be ageing more slowly according to certain biological clocks.

Unfortunately, determining whether arts engagement truly improves your health and slows your ageing is very difficult. There are three main challenges.

First, you need to distinguish whether arts engagement causes slower ageing or whether accelerated ageing (and poorer health) simply makes it harder to engage in the arts (an issue known as “reverse causation”).

Second, you need to account for the fact that the people who spend more time engaging with arts are generally very different to those who don’t; that is, they’re typically wealthier and living healthier lifestyles (an issue known as “confounding”).

And finally, you need to account for the fact that those who spend more time engaging in the arts may simply have more leisure time. This means being very clear about what you are comparing the time spent engaging with the arts against.

It seems plausible that visiting a gallery would be better for reducing stress than caring for a dying relative. But is it better than going for a walk? Or spending more time sleeping? Without a clear comparison, it’s impossible to tell whether spending time engaging with the arts is any better than any other leisure activity.

So how might we clearly study the causal effect of, say, spending time visiting galleries versus spending the same time watching TV on subsequent health and ageing?

The classic approach would be to conduct an experiment. Take a large enough group of people and randomly assign them to one of two groups, with one encouraged to visit galleries and the other to watch TV.

The snag is how exactly you would encourage people – and would it work?

You could pay them. But whatever effect you observed would not then represent the effect of freely visiting a gallery versus freely watching TV.

The more popular option is to study patterns in people taking part in long-running research studies. But to do this well would require repeated and detailed data on how people spend their time and their changing health, ageing indicators and other characteristics. In theory, this would allow you to study how an increase in, say, gallery attendance versus TV watching changed subsequent health or ageing indicators, after carefully accounting for everything mentioned above.

What does the research actually show?

Alas, most studies examining the effect of arts engagement on health and ageing fall well short of these requirements. The recent UCL study offers a textbook example. It examined the effect of arts and cultural engagement on biological ageing without stating a comparison.

So, at best, it studies the effect of having more time to spend on arts and cultural engagement. And it’s probably not that either, because of the other problems of reverse causation and confounding.

Since the study only had single-timepoint measures of arts engagement and ageing, there’s no way to distinguish the effects of arts engagement on slower ageing from the effects of accelerated ageing (and poorer health) on arts engagement.

The study did account for some of the differences in the profile of those engaging in more and less arts activities. But only partially, with several factors ignored – such as wealth, childhood circumstances and disease – and others overly simplified (employment was represented by a simple yes/no variable).

Several of the most important lifestyle factors, like smoking, alcohol use and body mass index (BMI) were also only examined as a secondary concern. When these were accounted for, the apparent effects shrank by 30-80%. And, again, these were all overly simplified. For example, only smoking status, not amount of smoking, was considered.

In the resulting media coverage, the researchers said the effects of more versus less arts engagement were “comparable to the difference between smokers and those who have given up smoking”, and the lead author suggested arts engagement should be promoted “just like we promote 10,000 steps a day or five-a-day of fruits and vegetables”. If you’re a smoker, I’m afraid visiting a few museums is unlikely to offer the same life-changing benefits as giving up smoking.

For everyone else, by all means spend more time visiting museums, galleries, singing, or painting. Your life will probably be richer for it. But if you want to live a longer, healthier life, then there’s probably no substitute for increasing your physical activity, improving your diet and reducing your alcohol intake.

The authors of the study on arts and ageing were offered the right of reply. Here is their response:

Researching arts engagement is indeed challenging as it’s a complex human behaviour. We used the same methods previously used to identify other behaviours related to biological ageing, like exercise, and are currently using the findings to design experiments.

We examined many confounders, selecting those that influence arts engagement most strongly (e.g. household income and neighbourhood deprivation, which are highly correlated with wealth). Lifestyle factors can both influence and result from arts engagement (e.g. festivals can encourage substance use, while dancing can reduce BMI) – that’s why we compared results with and without them. Without lifestyle factors, biological age was 0.8 years lower among arts participants. With lifestyle factors, it was 0.65 years lower.

Experimental studies on other health outcomes suggest benefits arise not just from leisure time, but the emotional, cognitive, physical and social elements of the arts. We don’t advise substituting arts for other health-promoting behaviours, but experiments show that adding arts on top of these behaviours can lead to even greater improvements in health and wellbeing.

With unpaid carers saving Scotland over £13 billion per year according to government ministers, a report on local initiatives was presented to a recent council meeting.

Councillors have endorsed a range of initiatives designed to support unpaid carers in North Lanarkshire.

With unpaid carers saving Scotland over £13 billion per year according to government ministers, a report on local initiatives was presented to a recent council meeting.

Research shows that carers in North Lanarkshire have more positive experiences than those in many other areas, but there is still much that could be done.

In 2024 councillors agreed to invest in voluntary sector groups which support unpaid carers, resulting in established partnerships with five organisations Action For Children Young Carers Project North Lanarkshire, Alzheimer’s Scotland, Getting Better Together, Lanarkshire Carers and North Lanarkshire Carers Together.

They have now also agreed to commit remaining funds allocated to the council under the Carers (Scotland) Act 2016 implementation to appoint solicitors to set up power of attorneys for carers.

Powers of attorney can help prevent delays in discharging patients from hospital in cases where otherwise guardianship orders need to be pursued, especially in relation to adults with dementia.

Work is underway to recruit a solicitor or law firm to work under the new scheme, which would see referrals made by psychiatrists, with consent from their patients, to grant power of attorney to their carer. If this referrals procedure is a success and funding is available, this programme may in future be expanded to include referrals from other sources.

Currently the cost of granting a power of attorney can otherwise put people off, especially in situations where a carer has reduced or given up their paid employment. £100,000 in funding has been allocated to this work.

READ MORE: North Lanarkshire councillors approve £100m contract covering demolition works

A further £150,000 (over two years) will be used to expand the Carer Breather programme, which sees various organisations provide opportunities for carers to enjoy other activities ranging from paddle boarding to knit and natter sessions.

Some of these activities are entirely for carers while others also involve the person being cared for.

Initially the Carer Breather network involved 11 organisations and has grown to 15. This next expansion will take that to 19 groups including two new carer sitter options, and also help ensure the council is well prepared for the right of carers to time off being enshrined in law.

A two-year total of £100,000 will also be used to continue working with Strathclyde University on projects helping people with dementia, and this will be matched by a contribution from the university itself.

This money will expand CARE_PAC, which supports those approaching end of life, and CONSOLIDATE which is a rehabilitation programme. These will help unpaid carers continue to provide care and prevent or delay admissions to hospitals, care homes and hospices while also reducing carer stress and the need for paid support.

READ MORE: North Lanarkshire Council asked to approve conversion of gym in Newmains

PAMIS is a family support service currently helping some 80 families in North Lanarkshire who have a member with complex and profound multiple disabilities, and support from paid carers can exceed £400,000 annually, meaning investing in the support from PAMIS for unpaid carers is an example of “spending to save”.

Funding has been allocated at almost £85,000 over two years for assistive technology to support the assistive technology team by creating a new staffing post. The team helps carers get comfortable with using technology in a planned way rather than having to adapt during a time of crisis.

An additional £100,000 over two years will be used to support a range of arts activities for carers, helping them build resilience and socialise, in addition to improving numerous aspects of physical and mental health. It is also intended to increase the funding available by pursuing external grants.

An additional £50,000 will be invested in following up on a pilot scheme focusing on individual budgets for children and young people with additional support needs. A mid-point review of the pilot shows that this has had a significant impact on parent carers and young people.

READ MORE: Council receive application to construct new industrial buildings in Cleland

*Don’t miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here.

And did you know Lanarkshire Live had its own app? Download yours for free here.

Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives slammed Republicans for abruptly cancelling a vote to rein in President Donald Trump’s war in Iran before the House left for the Memorial Day weekend.

Lawmakers claimed that Republicans pulled the vote because they did not have enough votes to block the War Powers Act resolution to end the White House’s wildly unpopular war.

The resolution, which comes as members of both parties have attacked Trump over his Middle East policy, would require troops to withdraw within 60 to 90 days of deployment if Congress had not declared war or authorized use of military force.

The American public has also largely not been sold on the war. A New York Times/Siena College poll showed that 65 percent of voters disapproved of Trump’s handling of the conflict.

Republicans on Thursday kept open a vote to create a museum honoring women’s history, which ultimately failed. At that point, Rep. Jim McGovern, the ranking Democrat of the House Rules Committee, asked why the House was not voting as scheduled on the resolution.

“Are we not voting on it because the American people are sick and tired of this illegal war that is costing tens of billions of dollars?” McGovern asked amid heckling.

“Gas prices are through the roof. People can’t afford their groceries,” he said, which led to leadership hitting the gavel. “You guys don’t have the guts or the b**ls.”

The delay came after Trump and his Republican allies defeated the reelection attempt of Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of the biggest critics of Trump and of the Iran War. Republicans also had several absences, which likely meant the resolution could have passed. Earlier this week, Senate Democrats had enough Republicans join them on a War Powers Act resolution.

But just off the floor, Democrats were even angrier. Massachusetts Rep. Seth Moulton, a retired U.S. Marine Corps officer, told reporters that Republicans had “p***ied out.”

His colleague Rep. Pat Ryan of New York, a West Point graduate, was also furious.

“These chicken hawk motherf***ers are gonna send us home for Memorial Day weekend, where I’m gonna honor my fellow veterans that I served 27 months in combat with, and they are gonna not even give an up or down vote on continuing this war almost three months in,” he told The Independent.

The Trump administration launched the Iran war at the end of February. But House Speaker Mike Johnson has insisted Congress should not take action and said that the United States is “not at war right now.” The White House has gone back and forth between calling it a war or a “skirmish.”

Over time, more House Republicans have joined Democrats in War Powers Act resolutions.

“I think the American public wants this vote, but somebody doesn’t want to see the vote,” Rep. Lou Correa (D-Calif.) told The Independent. “ Last time it was tight, right? And I’m hearing that we’re going to have enough votes to pass it, so that’s the issue.”

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) made fun of her fellow Minnesotan, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, for failing to get the votes to stop the resolution.

“When the vote failed on the women’s museum bill, they knew that they didn’t have the votes for the war powers,” she told The Independent.

It capped off a whipsaw day on Capitol Hill.

Earlier, Senate Republicans met with acting Attorney General Todd Blanche after many had questions about the new $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund and whether any money would go to people who assaulted police officers on January 6.

In response, Republicans chose to go home rather than vote on a bill to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement as well as Customs and Border Protection. Shortly thereafter, House Speaker Mike Johnson called off votes for Friday.

We previously reported that the group had set up in the car park outside New Bury Community Learning Centre, but since then they have moved inside the grounds of the centre itself.

(Image: Dan Dougherty)

Though around six caravans have made it inside the community centre gates, there are still a large number in the car park outside.

Farnworth South Cllr Julie Pattison said: “Yes, we’re definitely working towards sorting it out.

“We have been in touch with Be One Homes about it, as they actually own the community centre.

“The council have also been made aware of it, so I should imagine the council liaison officer will go down and talk to them and ask them to move on, as is standard procedure.”

(Image: Dan Dougherty)

The group is very large, totalling around six caravans inside the grounds of the community centre and a further ten or so outside in the car park.

The council have legal powers to deal with encampments if the group do not move when requested to do so, but the process can take up to a week.

The New Bury Community Learning Centre provides learning courses for people moving on to further education and training, according to the Bolton Council website.

California’s housing crisis has gotten so bad that even a burned-out house on a busy corner in metropolitan Los Angeles is now worth $1 million.

The boarded-up, three-bedroom, two-bath home in Torrance sold for the eye-popping amount last week, according to multiple real estate websites. That’s despite it being clearly unlivable, with fire damage that includes a gaping hole in the roof.

“It’s a nice part of Torrance,” said NDA Real Estate chief financial officer Rhett Winchell, who handled an earlier auction of the burned-out house last year. “We had a tremendous amount of interest in the property.”

In the latest sale, the 1,140-square-foot, ranch-style house went for 2 percent above list price, according to Homes.com.

The stunning transaction appears emblematic of what the California Legislative Analyst’s Office calls a “serious housing shortage” that has resulted in costs “rising rapidly for decades.”

As of March, the median price of a “mid-tier” home in California was $775,000, more than twice the comparable national average of $366,000, according to the latest figures compiled by the LAO.

The burned-out house in Torrance has been vacant since a blaze broke out inside around 4 a.m. on Feb. 1, 2024, according to a Tuesday report in the Los Angeles Times.

The place was reportedly “dangerously cluttered” and the fire apparently started when a heating grate in the floor ignited something, forcing an older man who was the only person inside to escape through an open window.

The man survived the incident but later died and his house was sold at a probate auction last year, when the high bid was $980,000, plus a selling price that pushed the total to $1.075 million, Winchell said.

The unidentified auction winner resold the house on May 11.

The seller’s agent didn’t respond to an inquiry from The Independent and the buyer’s agent declined to identify his client or say what they planned to do with the property,

But Winchell said that the house “sold for the land value” last year and that the price wasn’t unusual for the area, where comparable homes in “move-in condition” regularly fetch $1.5 million.

Outgoing Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat and potential 2028 presidential candidate, has signed a series of bills aimed at increasing California’s housing stock, including several that led to a surge in construction of so-called accessory dwelling units on residential properties that already have a single or multifamily house.

Estimates of California’s housing shortage vary wildly but their midpoint suggests the Golden State needs an additional 2.2 million housing units — 14.9 percent of the current supply — to meet demand, according to research by the American Enterprise Institute.

Eric McGhee, policy director and senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, said that the laws covering accessory dwelling units were “probably the best of the reforms” and that work on them now accounted for about 20 percent of residential construction in the state.

But it’s unclear if they’re “really helping the housing supply,” McGhee said.

“We don’t know what those are actually being used for,” he said, adding that possibilities included home offices, man caves and short-term vacation rentals.

McGhee blamed California’s housing shortage on backlash to its post-World War II housing boom, with local governments imposing restrictions on new development “in the name of environmentalism or preserving a livable community.”

“It enabled equilibrium for particular communities, but not the state as a whole,” he said.

McGhee said the ideal solution involved making housing construction easier, faster and cheaper, both by easing the permitting process and encouraging the use of “modular, factory-based” methods of building homes.

“This is a long-term problem we’ve created and it’s going take a lot of time to dig our way out of it,” he said.

The Friday letters page urges caution when it comes to the summer showcases, as a reader admits he doesn’t care about PS5 exclusives.

Games Inbox is a collection of our readers’ letters, comments, and opinions. To join in with the discussions yourself email gamecentral@metro.co.uk

Price reduction
So there we have it, another massive price hike for PS Plus and I have officially reached my limit. There’s no way I’m paying for that anymore, not even on Essential, and if that means no more multiplayer than so be it. Maybe I’ll join for just a month, when a new multiplayer game comes out, but I’m sure I’ll manage, especially as Fortnite and games like that are free anyway.

As far as I’m concerned, it’s a disgrace that we’re expected to pay for online in the first place. You don’t on PC and yet for some reason on console you do, even though there are no extra benefits that amount to anything.

I get that Sony has to fleece customers for all they’ve got at the moment, because of rising costs and other things not necessarily their fault. I’m not here to prop up a billion dollar multinational. I will now be cancelling myPS Plus subscription and giving them less money than ever as a result, so I guess that’s had the opposite result of what they were hoping. Will be interested to hear if anyone else is doing the same.
Cranston

Safe secrets
For those worrying about GTA 6 pre-orders I’ve just seen the Take-Two boss saying that the ‘next few weeks’ don’t count as summer. I’m not sure that’s technically true, because June is definitely summer as far as I’m concerned, but to me this reinforces the rumour that nothing is happening till late summer. By which I assume they mean late July or August.

It is funny that no matter how much everything else leaks, almost no GTA 6 rumour ever turns out to be true. Apart from it being set in Vice City and the two main characters I don’t think we’ve heard anything solid about the game at all, in all these years. That includes the price and the dates, which is what people have been interested in the most. So good job, Rockstar. I guess?
Royston

Punished Bubsy
I find it hilarious that Bubsy can’t even get a good game when a decent developer is working on it. I really liked Demon Tides and felt sure that would guarantee Bubsy a good game, since it’s basically an IP you can do anything you like with. But no, 61 on Metacritic.

Now I want to see Nintendo or FromSoftware make a Bubsy game and for it to still turn out terrible somehow. I wonder how the curse started though? Obviously the first game was rubbish, and the 3D one, but there’s been quite a few now and yet not even the law of averages can help the series. It’s like Sonic taken to the extreme, which I guess was supposed to be the point all along.
Bors

Email your comments to: gamecentral@metro.co.uk

A remake 65 million years in the making
Just a little titbit of information that I think GC and other dinosaur fans will appreciate: the recent re-releases of Dino Crisis have seen its lifetime franchise go up to 4.9 million, overtaking Ōkami. This is important because Ōkami is getting a sequel and Dino Crisis… is not.

I don’t know why Capcom keep ignoring it but if it’s not because they have big plans for it I will be gutted. Although it’s difficult to be surprised by it, considering how long they’ve been trying to pretend it doesn’t exist.

I felt like we got pretty close to a full remake not long ago, when they were hinting at it, so I’m not sure what changed that they suddenly were all against it. Whoever the dino hater is at Capcom they have to go!
Bernie

From summer
I know we’ve had the pirate leak lately but I don’t believe that said anything about when the game would be announced, so I wonder what the chance of seeing a new multiformat From game are next month? The problem is The Duskbloods, which Nintendo will want all the attention, but will they be able to boss From enough not to talk about their other stuff?

I don’t imagine anyone knows the answer to that but with the Elden Ring film reminding me how good that game was I’m feeling From withdrawal symptoms at the moment. It feels like we haven’t even had a decent clone in a while either. Sometimes I think games taking five or more years to make maybe isn’t such a good idea.
Gauntlett

Summer forecast
With the summer showcases coming I think we all need to seriously get in the mindset that they’ll be disappointing so that when they are, we at least have a chance of being excited by the few things they do say.

This Nintendo one in particular… maybe we get the rumoured Zelda remake, but I’d say that was a pretty big maybe. More likely we’ll just get non-events like the rumoured Xenoblade Chronicles 2 Switch 2 Edition and the Devil May Cry 5 port. If there’s more than one big name reveal from Nintendo I feel we will be doing very well.

Xbox I could see showing off Project Helix in some way, but I don’t look forward to their event as you just know how they’re going to go on, pretending they’re this beloved brand and not the richest company in the world that still can’t get games right.

As for Sony, I feel it could go either way. They could do their usual minimum effort or the recent stuff about single-player games could be leading up to them going back to how things were on the PlayStation 4. That sounds too much like fan wishful thinking though. And while I am a fan and I am wishing that would happen I wouldn’t exactly bet on it.
Radish

Day one bonus
Not to ask a silly question but why does anyone want to pre-order GTA 6 anyway? Are you afraid they’re going to run out of digital copies? I know it’s GTA, and I’ll probably get it day one too, but that doesn’t mean I’ll pre-order it. I just don’t get why people do it for any game.

You often have them bragging in the Inbox that they’ve done it and then immediately saying ‘I hope it’s good’ or even ‘I don’t know that much about it.’ These people must love blind bags.

Even if you accept that there’s basically no way that GTA 6 can disappoint you still don’t gain anything by pre-ordering. At most there’ll be a free T-shirt or something with it, that you’ll never use, and that’s it. But the company will already have your money, so I can definitely see why they encourage it.
Bison

Don’t miss Gaming news! Add us as a Preferred Source

As a loyal GameCentral reader, we want to make sure you never miss our articles when searching for gaming stories. We have all the latest video games news, reviews, previews, and interviews, with a vibrant community of highly engaged readers.

Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.

Advertisement

Add us as a Preferred Source

Au contraire
I know I’m seemingly in a minority here (and am being a little contrarian) but as a PlayStation owner I have to admit I’m personally not that bothered about Sony exclusives. I game on the console because it’s the box you buy that plugs into the TV and you don’t need to think about it… and PlayStation 5 is the market leader in that space. When I’m pouring hours into classics Elden Ring, Baldur’s Gate 3, or Clair Obscur I’m not thinking ‘I could be sat in a man cave at a desk doing this, with a keyboard and mouse like I’m at work’. What else would I buy to play the latest games on my sofa, without worrying about fiddling with settings or compromised ports?

I still think (and obviously Valve do too) that there is space in the market for that machine. A machine that just gets out the way and lets you play the games in the living room, whatever those games may be. I’ve always seen console and PC as different markets for that reason, so baffled when readers are like ‘why not just buy a PC’. It’s like telling someone who lives in London and gets the tube around to ‘just buy a car’, because that’s the best way to get around where you live in… I dunno, Kent. Why would they do that it makes no sense?

Also, a little off topic but to be honest Sony’s games mostly aren’t even that good, even in the high point of the PlayStation 4. Sure we’ve got Bloodbourne, Astro Bot, and Returnal… but then what? Loads of bloated and ‘cinematic’ 7/10 action adventures that would rather be TV? Great. Most of them practically play themselves, as if complex gameplay is beneath them.
Marc

Inbox also-rans
I just tried to play Marathon and there weren’t even enough people to get a game at first. I really do worry that Bungie isn’t going to make it to the end of this year.
Blotter

Have to agree with those saying that Saros is not as good as Returnal. I’m enjoying but I wouldn’t say the combat was better, just the same, and a lot of the others tuff, like the worlds and story, are definitely worse.
Gadfly

Email your comments to: gamecentral@metro.co.uk

The small print
New Inbox updates appear every weekday morning, with special Hot Topic Inboxes at the weekend. Readers’ letters are used on merit and may be edited for length and content.

You can also submit your own 500 to 600-word Reader’s Feature at any time via email or our Submit Stuff page, which if used will be shown in the next available weekend slot.

You can also leave your comments below and don’t forget to follow us on Twitter.

MORE: Games Inbox: What will be in the June State of Play for PS5?

MORE: Games Inbox: Is PlayStation right to abandon the PC?

MORE: Games Inbox: When will GTA 6 pre-orders start?

However, his appointments drew criticism from opposition parties at Holyrood, with Meghan Gallacher of the Conservatives saying it appeared Mr Swinney’s government “had been on Mounjaro because it has slimmed down in size” but adding despite this it “still somehow carries all the same political baggage”.

Stan Wildhirt, who represents the Whiteleas ward, was formally appointed during the council’s annual meeting at South Shields Town Hall.

He will be supported in his civic duties by his wife Dawn, who will serve as Mayoress.

(Image: South Tyneside Council)

Councillor Wildhirt said: “To represent South Tyneside as Mayor is a profound honour.

“My focus for the year ahead is firmly with a focus on bringing people together and celebrating the best that South Tyneside has to offer.

“We live in a fantastic Borough with an unbeatable community spirit, and by standing together, we can look to the future with absolute confidence and positivity.”

During the ceremony, outgoing Mayor, former councillor Jay Potts, handed over the Chains of Office.

Councillor Wildhirt outlined his intention to champion the borough’s resilience throughout his mayoral year.

He said: “My Mayoress and I are eager to get out into the heart of our communities to showcase the resilience, talent, and warmth of our residents.

“No matter what challenges come our way, the people of South Tyneside have a remarkable ability to keep moving forward with a smile.

“We want to instil that sense of hope and pride in every corner of our towns and villages.”

Before entering politics, Councillor Wildhirt served as a paratrooper in the British Army and later as a firefighter.

His business career includes growing McGurk Sports into a 17-shop retail network and launching an international manufacturing brand.

He is also a strong supporter of grassroots sport and its role in developing confidence, focus, and healthy lifestyles among young people.

During his time as mayor, Councillor Wildhirt will raise funds through the Mayor’s Charity Appeal in support of five organisations:

The Chloe and Liam Together Forever Trust, Escape Intervention Services, Pawz 4 Thought, The Toby Henderson Trust, and Veterans for Veterans in Care.

Councillor Alan Rice was named Deputy Mayor for the 2026/27 municipal year and will be supported by his wife Margaret.

The annual meeting also saw Councillor Paul Mackings confirmed as the new leader of the council, with the following cabinet appointments:

• Susan Sybenga, Deputy Leader, Finance and Resources
• David Royal, Economic Growth, Regeneration and Investment
• Steve Smith, Housing
• Elliott Curry, Culture, Leisure, Tourism and Voluntary Sector
• Karen Pittuck, Highways, Neighbourhoods and Community Safety
• Michelle Fascione, Children and Families, Education and Skills
• Andy Heywood, Adults, Health and Independence