David Harker, 51, has been eligible for parole since 2013
A killer who boasted that he had eaten parts of his victim with a plate of pasta has had his application for parole refused for a ninth time. David Harker, now 51, killed mother-of-four Julie Paterson, 32, in Darlington in 1998, and only some of her remains have ever been found.
Harker is currently serving a life sentence after admitting manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility. It previously emerged that he had told friends and psychiatrists that he had fried part of his victim’s thigh and eaten it with pasta and cheese.
He has been eligible for parole since 2013, and a ninth hearing was held this month to determine whether he should be freed or moved to an open prison.
The Parole Board said it was still not considered safe to allow him to be released or to be transferred, based on the continuing need to protect the public.
Harker was 24 when he was sentenced in 1999.
Psychiatrists agreed he had a severe psychopathic disorder when he killed Ms Paterson, meaning he was not guilty of murder.
The Parole Board said the law required Harker’s case to be assessed regularly.
A report into his recent behaviour found that his behaviour in custody had “significantly improved”, with no disciplinary findings since 2015.
Previous decisions have been made using documents but the latest, ninth, heard oral evidence.
Harker did not attend or make representations.
The panel considered a dossier containing 356 pages of reports, including submissions on behalf of the Secretary of State arguing against release.
It heard from the person responsible for managing Harker in jail, two probation officers who would be responsible for managing him in the community, a psychologist and someone who worked with him on a programme in prison.
While the person who worked with him on the programme was not allowed to recommend a course of action, the others said Harker did not pass the test for release.
In its conclusion, a Parole Board summary of the decision said: “The panel carefully analysed all the evidence and formed its own independent assessment of risk.
“It decided not to direct the release of David Harker, nor to recommend to the Secretary of State that David Harker should be transferred to open conditions.”



You must be logged in to post a comment Login