Connect with us

NewsBeat

Is Germany’s far right AfD about to take over a state government for the first time?

Published

on

Is Germany’s far right AfD about to take over a state government for the first time?

Germans in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt will go to the polls on September 7 to elect a new parliament.

With forecasts indicating that the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is on course to win around 40% of the vote, which would double its support there compared to five years ago, there is a real chance the far-right party could take over a state government for the first time.

Former East Germany, which was under Communist rule between 1949 and 1989, has proven fertile ground for the far right. The AfD won 34.6% of the vote there in the 2025 federal election, while in Saxony-Anhalt that figure was 37.1%. This was far higher than mainstream parties on the left and right.

Much has been written about the reasons for far-right success in eastern Germany. Deindustrialisation, demographic change and depopulation, especially in rural areas, are all drivers. So too is the fact there is far stronger disagreement in the east with Germany’s support for Ukraine in its war with Russia than is in evidence in the west, as well as higher levels of opposition to refugees.

Advertisement

Perhaps above all, there is a strong sense in the east of feeling “second-class citizens” in modern Germany, even more than three decades after reunification. Unemployment in Saxony-Anhalt is above the German average, standing at 8.2% in August compared to a national average of 6.5%. The median wage in full-time employment was also around €48,300 (£41,400), below the national level of about €52,000.

The election in Saxony-Anhalt takes place at a time when the AfD is already leading nationwide polls, and when the federal government and chancellor Friedrich Merz are vastly unpopular (with around 85% of voters dissatisfied). It is also happening in a part of the country where the far right tends to do best.

The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz (left), and Saxony-Anhalt Governor Sven Schulze attend a press conference in Quedlinburg on August 31 after a campaign event ahead of the state election.
Filip Singer / EPA

The AfD has come top in a state election once before, in Thuringia in 2024. But it did not get a majority of seats. Mainstream parties rallied around and formed a government between the centre-right Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU), left-populist Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) and Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD).

They rely on the support of Die Linke (the Left Party) to function and pass legislation. The CDU has long ruled out any cooperation with the Left Party at the state or national level because of the latter’s historic links to the communist regime in East Germany and continued ideological disagreements. But in practice, in Thuringia and the national parliament, this anti-cooperation line has softened.

Advertisement

In Saxony-Anhalt, as in most other states in Germany, parties need at least 5% of the vote to win any seats in the state parliament. If they fall below that level, they don’t get any. So all eyes will be not only on the result of the AfD, the CDU (which polling suggests is set to take 23% of the vote) and the Left Party (forecast to take 13%) but also smaller parties.

Polling has had the SPD hovering around the 5% mark, although its support seems to have picked up. The same goes for the Greens, while the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) looks set to miss out. If the only parties making it over 5% are the AfD, CDU and Left Party, the AfD could win an overall majority of seats. The BSW, which is hovering around the 5% mark, has also made it clear it would not block the AfD entering government.

The AfD’s proposals

The AfD’s manifesto in Saxony-Anhalt is extremely right-wing. Proposals such as ending the right to asylum and a moratorium on non-EU immigration could not be implemented. They are matters for the national not state government.

But other AfD proposals are legally feasible. These include changing the school curriculum to downplay the significance of the Nazi era – a programme one AfD politician, Hans-Thomas Tillschneider, sums up as: “More Bismarck, less Hitler”. This was a reference to Otto von Bismarck, who oversaw the unification of Germany in 1871.

Advertisement

The AfD has also suggested introducing the routine singing of the German national anthem in school assemblies and ending what it calls “inclusion” in mainstream education for children with special needs. Defunding the protestant church, which the AfD has accused of being too focused on social not theological questions, would also be a real possibility.

A particular worry is around Germany’s “constitutional protection” or secret services. There is consideration being given to setting up parallel offices in Saxony-Anhalt to protect sensitive operations in the event of an AfD administration. Many branches and elements of the AfD are under observation by German intelligence agencies on the basis of suspected extremism.

There will almost certainly be wider political ructions from this election if the AfD tops the poll, and even more so if it wins outright control of the state government. Any major changes at the top of German politics will probably wait until after elections in Berlin and Mecklenburg West Pomerania later in the month.

Mainstream parties will want to keep some appearance of unity until then for fear of losing yet more votes. But, at the very least, rumours of an early challenge to Merz are likely to step up a gear.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Andy Burnham jokingly compares Bayeux Tapestry to politics career | News

Published

on

Video Player Placeholder

Andy Burnham jokingly compared his political journey to the story depicted in the Bayeux Tapestry as he gave a speech at the British Museum celebrating its loan to the UK on Wednesday (2 September).

The prime minister said the embroidered cloth “shows a new leader emerging from a northern territory, travelling to the south of England in search of the crown, something clearly that couldn’t happen today.”

The 70-metre-long tapestry depicts the Norman conquest of England, when William the Conqueror invaded and defeated King Harold Godwinson.

It has returned to the UK for the first time in almost 1,000 years, on loan until September 2027 as part of a special trilateral agreement between the UK, France and the London museum.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

King says ‘what is past is prologue’ after Bayeux tour with Macron and Burnham

Published

on

King says ‘what is past is prologue’ after Bayeux tour with Macron and Burnham

The tapestry was “most likely to have been embroidered in Canterbury by English”, Charles said, before joking: “The Bayeux Tapestry – or the Canterbury embroidery as it might just have been called… recounts a conflict, yet here it is today, nearly a thousand years later, as a precious symbol of trust, at a time when trust seems sadly to be in short supply between nations.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Maine’s high court rules father can restrict daughter’s church attendance

Published

on

Jury says The New York Times defamed Alabama player

A Portland District Court judge was correct in giving a father the power to decide whether his daughter could attend an evangelical church following a clash with the girl’s mother over her religious upbringing, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled on Sept. 1.

The decision keeps in place the lower court’s ruling on a 2024 dispute between Matthew Bradeen and Emily Bickford regarding the religious upbringing of their daughter, who was then 11 years old. Bickford had been bringing her daughter to multiple services a week at Calvary Chapel Greater Portland, an evangelical church in Westbrook.

Bradeen argued the church was a “dangerous and harmful environment” that had caused his daughter to suffer from anxiety. He said she had a panic attack after hearing the church’s teachings on the rapture, a belief that Christians will join God at the end of the world and nonbelievers will be left behind.

The lower court ruled in his favor, saying some of the church’s language was “psychologically damaging the child” because of how it characterized her father, and the state’s high court affirmed this decision on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The lower court ruling gave Bradeen the right to decide whether his daughter could continue to attend Calvary Chapel services or interact with members of the church other than her mother. It also said the pair must “continue to share parental rights and responsibilities” regarding their daughter’s exposure to other religious organizations, but that if they disagreed the father has the right to make final decisions.

Bickford’s lawyer, Mathew Staver, told The Monitor he plans to appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Staver’s law firm, Liberty Counsel, which describes itself as a “Christian ministry” focused on religious freedom, has been involved in other cases before the U.S. Supreme Court including a 2022 case in which the court ruled in favor of a private religious group that Boston had barred from flying a Christian flag.

In a brief to the Maine Supreme Court, Liberty Counsel argued that the 2024 order violated Bickford’s First Amendment rights through its “open hostility” toward religious beliefs and by preventing her from directing the “religious upbringing of her child as she sees fit.”

“What Maine has done in this decision is put the Supreme Court of Maine at odds with the courts of a number of other states,” Staver said. “I think it will be a case that will be very significant and catch the attention of the Supreme Court because of how far-reaching it is with regards to the First Amendment exercise clause.”

Advertisement

Michelle King, an attorney representing the father, said she “anticipated all along” that the case could end up before the Supreme Court. She called the Sept. 1 decision “well thought-out and reasoned” and said Bradeen was happy with the result.

“Anytime you’re in court, it’s stressful,” King said. “But this case has definitely garnered a lot of media attention, and I think that’s always difficult for parents.”

Advertisement

Part of the case centered on one service where Bradeen himself was mentioned by the church’s pastor. While hearings for the original dispute were ongoing, Bickford brought her daughter to a service at Calvary Chapel Greater Portland in which pastor Travis Carey led a six-and-a-half-minute prayer focused on the case, referring to the parents and child by name “almost 30 times,” describing Bradeen as “in need of salvation” and calling the proceedings “an attack on God’s Word.”

According to the Maine Supreme Court, Bickford made no attempt to remove her child from the service and later called it “appropriate.” She “is unwilling to recognize, much less mitigate, the risk that these messages alienate the child from Bradeen or otherwise cause her harm,” the court wrote.

In the 2024 order, Maine District Court Judge Jennifer Nofsinger wrote that the harm caused to the daughter stemmed not from “a belief system that is rooted in the Bible” but from the mother’s “inability to co-parent” on the topic of religion and the fact that she had given control of decisions about her daughter’s best interests to the church and its language had disparaged the father.

“The court found that the child was harmed by Bickford’s decisions to expose the child to messages that characterized Bradeen as an ‘enemy’ who seeks to ‘persecute’ the child and her faith, and by Bickford’s unwillingness to prevent the child from receiving those messages or to take any other steps to reduce the risk of alienating her from Bradeen,” the Maine Supreme Court wrote in its Sept. 1 decision affirming the order.

Advertisement

The final finding “reflected simply that it is harmful for a child to hear negative and frightening messages about one parent from the other parent or the other parent’s authority figures.” The court found that the order rested on the parents’ inability to co-parent on matters of religion, not on the substance of Bickford’s religious beliefs, making it necessary for one parent to be granted decision-making authority over the other.

While Calvary Chapel Greater Portland was not an official party in this case, churches in the evangelical network been at the center of several lawsuits in recent years, including a 2020 lawsuit brought by Calvary Chapel of Bangor against the state for its pandemic restrictions and an ongoing lawsuit brought by Calvary Chapel Belfast alleging religious discrimination after the University of Maine System rescinded its agreement to sell a building to the church. Liberty Counsel represented both churches in their cases.

Bickford and her counsel have 90 days to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

___

Advertisement

This story was originally published by The Maine Monitor and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘Below the dignity of the office’: Canadian officials condemn Pete Hegseth cadet post

Published

on

Pete Hegseth gestures by lifting his hand as he frowns

In a statement, the Army Cadet League of Canada, a civilian organisation that supports the programme, said it strongly condemns “any online harassment, or mockery of cadets’ achievements”.

“Directing derogatory commentary toward youth who are actively working to better themselves and serve their communities is unacceptable,” the organisation said.

Speaking to broadcaster CBC, Canada’s top military commander, General Jennie Carignan, said they are in contact with the cadets involved and any response they may have.

“We are consulting with them on how they want to go about doing this,” she said.

Advertisement

Other officials weighed in, including Scott Anderson, a Conservative member of parliament for the Canadian city of Vernon and a former military reservist, who in a post directed at Hegseth accused him not living up to the “responsibility and decorum” that comes with his title.

“You have chosen to set both aside and insult two female Canadian non-combatants, and to intentionally shame them before millions. You should be ashamed,” he said.

“Our economies, our continental defence and our cultures are irretrievably intertwined and yet we are two distinct nations. Canadians and Americans should have no problem with each other, but I have a problem with you,” Anderson added.

Trade talks broke down between Canada and the US last month, with both sides accusing the other of last-minute demands that torpedoed a tentative agreement.

Advertisement

The US immediately imposed 50% tariffs on some $20bn (C$28bn) of Canadian imports, and Canada plans to bring in matching countermeasures next week.

Both sides have traded insults, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford calling Trump a “loser”, the US president seeking to change the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America, and transportation secretary Sean Duffy accusing Canada of being a country that “doesn’t have a military”.

Still, the two counties have long been defence partners and allies, including when Canada backed the US in the war in Afghanistan.

Canada has also significantly ramped up defence spending in recent months after years of lagging behind Nato targets.

Advertisement

Hegseth, a veteran, is himself under pressure at home following a string of recent high-profile military leaders leaving the Pentagon and questions about the US handling of the Iran war.

He has also long focused on the appearance and physical fitness of US troops and on what he calls the “warrior ethos”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Burnham and Majority of Britons agree with Burnham that Brexit was ‘wrong turn’ for UK

Published

on

Burnham and Majority of Britons agree with Burnham that Brexit was ‘wrong turn’ for UK

The majority of Britons agree with Andy Burnham that the country took a wrong turn by leaving the European Union, but they are split over his belief that Margaret Thatcher’s premiership set the country on the wrong path.

Addressing the House of Commons for the first time as prime minister on Tuesday, the former mayor of Greater Manchester took aim at deindustrialisation and privatisation of the 1980s, and the impact of austerity and Brexit on regions of the UK outside of England’s South East and London.

He listed the “series of wrong turns” the UK has made since over the past 40s years and warned that Brexit had embedded the problems in the last decade.

Mr Burnham told MPs: “From the 1980s, this country took a series of wrong turns. Political power was centralised, economic power privatised.

Advertisement

“The country deindustrialised. Austerity followed, hollowing out councils and depriving them of the agency to act to reverse any of this, and then Brexit, compounding the damage, ushering in a decade of low growth and stalled regeneration.”

Andy Burnham made his Commons debut as prime minister on Tuesday
Andy Burnham made his Commons debut as prime minister on Tuesday (Reuters)

According to new polling from YouGov, 55 per cent of British people agree with the prime minister that Brexit was a wrong turn, with 21 per cent disagreeing. 11 per cent said neither and 13 per cent said they did not know.

Among Labour voters at the 2024 general election, 78 per cent believed it to be a wrong turn, while 59 per cent of Reform voters claimed it was a right turn.

The Makerfield MP’s comments were welcomed by pro-EU campaigners just days after The Independent revealed the £11.7bn a year loss in exports Brexit has caused for British business as well as a survey showing 98.2 per cent of businesses want the UK to rejoin the single market.

Naomi Smith, chief executive of Best for Britain, said: “It’s hugely welcome to hear a prime minister stand at the despatch box and say loudly and clearly that Brexit harmed Britain; far from taking back control, it shrank our economy, left us poorer, weaker, less safe and more divided.”

Advertisement

Europe: The Way Back

We’re campaigning to rebuild Britain’s future in Europe


When it comes to Baroness Thatcher, whose 11 years in Downing Street from 1979 to 1990 made her the longest-serving British prime minister of the 20th century, 35 per cent of Britons believe her premiership represented a wrong turn for the country.

28 per cent said it was more of a right turn, with 14 per cent saying neither and 23 per cent not knowing.

60 per cent of 2024 Conservative voters and 57 per cent of Reform voters said it was a right turn, while 58 per cent of Labour voters believed it to be a wrong turn.

Advertisement

Regarding the privatisation and centralisation of power prominent during the Thatcher years – and the legacy he believes it has left – Mr Burnham claimed this was a “failed economic model”.

He said it had led to high streets across the country being left desolate and described Britain’s water industry as “a leaking monument to that approach, a country run in the private rather than public interest”.

“For a long time, the country did not have ambitions for its regions outside of London – it even talked of the managed decline of Liverpool,” the prime minister told the Commons.

“It took the devolution of power out of this place to allow our big city regions the ability to set new ambitions for themselves.

Advertisement

“Now, I want every single place across our regions and nations to be able to do the same, creating the conditions for good growth in every postcode.”

Join the Independent’s new campaign
Join the Independent’s new campaign (The Independent)

What you will get by joining our campaign Europe: The Way Back:

  • A dedicated community: We are fully committed to the long haul, consistently campaigning to secure the absolute best deal for Britain within Europe.
  • Free weekly newsletter: Every Wednesday, political editor David Maddox and political correspondent Millie Cooke will be in your inbox with exclusive reporting, analysis and insight on the biggest developments shaping relations between Britain and Europe. Each week, they will explain what’s happened, what it means, and what the key political figures, experts and decision-makers are saying about it.
  • Essential continental updates: Stay informed with regular briefings on the biggest developments in European politics and the specific policies that could pave the way for closer EU relations.

There are even more benefits if you subscribe for just £1 for seven months:

  • Exclusive content: Get the highest-quality analysis, opinion and debate from political experts across the UK and Europe by subscribing to our premium service.
  • The Brexit Effect: You’ll get exclusive access to extracts from Anthony Seldon’s major new book, The Brexit Effect, offering an unparalleled analysis of the 10 years since the referendum.
  • Inform the debate: Receive exclusive invitations to live events, webinars, expert Q&As and podcast recordings.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Low flypast over Cape Town stadium prompts safety review

Published

on

Low flypast over Cape Town stadium prompts safety review

JOHANNESBURG (AP) — A low-altitude flyover by two Airlink passenger jets before a rugby match at Cape Town’s DHL Stadium is being reviewed by South African aviation authorities after it drew safety concerns, officials said Wednesday.

The South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) said it had obtained flight data recordings and requested additional information from regional carrier Airlink as part of its assessment. A full report with recommendations will be issued once the review is complete.

“It is therefore critical that we interrogate this past weekend’s events … to determine if there were any safety concerns which warrant a review,” the agency said in a statement.

Airlink has withdrawn plans for another flyover at the upcoming rugby match in Soweto, according to the SACAA, which is responsible for regulating aviation safety and security.

Advertisement

The flyover ahead of the Springboks-All Blacks rugby match on Aug. 29 drew huge cheers from an estimated crowd of about 56,000, but also sparked a debate over the safety risks after video footage by spectators inside and around the stadium spread online.

Deandra Peters, 25, a pilot and aviation enthusiast attending her first live rugby match, said the crowd in the stadium was electrified by the spectacle in a way that was difficult to capture on video.

“You can watch the planes fly over, but you can’t recreate what it felt like to be inside a stadium full of Springbok supporters absolutely losing their minds,” she told The Associated Press. “The atmosphere was electric — the noise, the pride, the emotion. It was a very uniquely South African moment.”

Airlink on Wednesday said the maneuver had been carefully planned and rehearsed and that safety was “the first consideration at every stage of the process.” It said each aircraft had three senior captains aboard, with more than 75,000 combined flight hours across the crews.

Advertisement

Earlier this week, Airlink had provided the data from the airplanes’ black boxes to the civil aviation authority for review.

The SACAA said it would examine flight data to determine whether any safety concerns warranted a review.

The airline acknowledged the enthusiasm generated by the spectacle while also recognizing what it described as the “valid questions and concerns” that followed.

“We never intended to become the news or upstage Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry,” Airlink chief executive de Villiers Engelbrecht said in a statement.

The regulator said the airline had made applications for three flyovers. The most recent one in Cape Town was the second, while the first flyover took place in Johannesburg on Aug. 22. Both were approved in line with the requirements for special air events.

Airlink has withdrawn its application for a flyover scheduled for Sept. 1, over Johannesburg’s FNB Stadium. The airline said forecast weather conditions were unfavorable for a safe formation flyby. SACAA confirmed that the application had been withdrawn.

Advertisement

South African rugby has a long tradition of stadium flybys at major matches, dating back to the 1995 Rugby World Cup final in Johannesburg, when a Boeing 747 swept over Ellis Park before the Springboks faced the All Blacks.

Last Saturday’s flyby was unusually low and dramatic, drawing international attention, with some aviation experts later questioning whether the aircraft had left too little margin for error.

___

AP Africa news: https://apnews.com/hub/africa

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Missing historic street sign recovered half a mile away from where it disappeared

Published

on

Belfast Live

“The fear was that it was gone forever, so it’s great that this hasn’t been the outcome.”

A historic street sign in South Belfast that went missing a number of weeks ago has been recovered half a mile away.

Advertisement

The tiled Ravenhill Road sign, which is more than 100 years old, was reported missing last month after it disappeared from its installed location. The disappearance sparked concerns that the sign had been stolen, something that has happened to other historic signs in the area.

SDLP Botanic councillor Gary McKeown had raised concerns regarding the missing sign and has now said it was recovered half a mile from where it disappeared.

He said that unlike its neighbouring sign for the Ormeau Road, the Ravenhill Road sign did not have listed protection.

Advertisement

He said: “I’m very relieved that the old tiled Ravenhill Road street sign which disappeared a number of weeks ago has been located and recovered. The fear was that it was gone forever, so it’s great that this hasn’t been the outcome. I’m now making arrangements to return it to the council for reinstallation.

“This sign is over 100 years old, and is showing evidence of wear and tear. I brought a proposal through Belfast City Council to develop a programme of restoration and protection of Belfast’s iconic black tiled signs, which has been taken forward and just awaits funding. I’ve asked for this project to be expedited as these signs are an integral part of our city.

“I also discovered that unlike a similar sign for the Ormeau Road which was right beside this one, it doesn’t have listed protection, so I’ve got confirmation now that it will now be formally assessed for listing. Of course, it needs to be reinstalled for this to happen, so the sooner this is done, the better.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Kirstie Allsopp reveals she was rushed to hospital in an air ambulance to undergo surgery after suffering a nasty fall during her family holiday

Published

on

Kirstie Allsopp has revealed she was rushed to hospital to undergo leg surgery after suffering a nasty fall during her family holiday

Kirstie Allsopp has revealed she was rushed to hospital to undergo leg surgery after suffering a nasty fall during her family holiday.

The Location, Location, Location star, 55, has shared snaps of her bandaged foot after being airlifted to hospital while on the beach in Cornwall, following a fall on a ‘muddy step’.

Kirstie shared an image of her face covered in tubes as she prepared to undergo surgery on her leg.

The presenter told her followers she’d been enjoying a day on the beach to celebrate her birthday, and said it took ‘a whole host of people’ to help track down her location so an air ambulance could take her to the hospital.

Advertisement

She captioned the post: ‘Almost every year since Oscar was born we have celebrated my birthday at Meadowgate, one of my favourite places on earth. 

‘We have a picnic on the beach at Welcombe Mouth, a swim and a walk back to the house for some cake, unfortunately I slipped on a muddy patch on the steep path, and it took a whole host of people to get me to hospital. 

Kirstie Allsopp has revealed she was rushed to hospital to undergo leg surgery after suffering a nasty fall during her family holiday

Advertisement
The Location, Location, Location star has shared snaps of her bandaged foot after being airlifted to hospital while on the beach in Cornwall, following a fall on a 'muddy step'

The Location, Location, Location star has shared snaps of her bandaged foot after being airlifted to hospital while on the beach in Cornwall, following a fall on a ‘muddy step’

‘After a little wait while poor Oscar ran as fast as he could to get help, and the @rnli_bude_lifeboat paramedics & @cornwallairamb tracked me down (I ❤️ #whatthreewords) I was given a huge amount of painkillers so I omitted to ask anyone for their social media details, but if this post is wrong I hope someone will tell me. 

‘I remember Chris and Jeremy & I think there was a Lee, and there was definitely young Jake in the ambulance. 

‘But according to Ben & the boys I have far more people than that to thank. God only knows what I was like to deal with high as a kite! 

Advertisement

‘Everyone at Barnstaple hospital has been amazing, kind & caring, so many lovely people doing their absolute best. 

‘They have operated on the leg and I’ll be home soon. It’ll be a boot and crutches for a while but I feel very, very lucky that it was possible to reach me and get me to hospital so quickly, and I have a job that I can do on crutches. 

‘Not a birthday I am going to forget in a hurry and again, THANK YOU to all those who have been involved in my care.’

Kirstie married property tycoon Ben Anderson in January 2025 after more than 20 years together, and they are parents to sons Bay, 20, and Oscar, 18.

Advertisement

The broadcaster recently looked back on her time presenting Location, Location, Location with her longtime co-host Phil Spencer, joking she was his ‘second choice’ for the job.

In a lengthy Instagram post, Kirstie paid tribute to the ambulance and hospital staff who took care of her, and said she was 'very very lucky' they could reach her

In a lengthy Instagram post, Kirstie paid tribute to the ambulance and hospital staff who took care of her, and said she was ‘very very lucky’ they could reach her

The presenter told her followers she'd been enjoying a day on the beach to celebrate her birthday, and said it took 'a whole host of people' to help track down her location after the fall

The presenter told her followers she’d been enjoying a day on the beach to celebrate her birthday, and said it took ‘a whole host of people’ to help track down her location after the fall

Kirstie shared a snap of the Cornwall Air Ambulance service as they made their way to her on the beach

Kirstie shared a snap of the Cornwall Air Ambulance service as they made their way to her on the beach

Advertisement
The property guru showed the X-ray of her injured knee, and shared she would be 'home soon' after undergoing the operation on her leg

The property guru showed the X-ray of her injured knee, and shared she would be ‘home soon’ after undergoing the operation on her leg

Speaking on This Morning, she said: ‘There was an Italian girl with legs up to here,’ before pointing to her upper chest. 

‘Phil really, really wanted her but the problem was, her accent was so strong.’ 

Shaking his head, Phil responded: ‘That’s not quite true,’ but Kirstie continued: ‘And then there was a really sweet girl who was an estate agent but I think that she probably was a bit intimidated by the whole thing.

Advertisement

‘He sort of ended up with me by default, we did a non-transmissible pilot, thank god that will never come to air – and we both thought, ‘Oh, that was fun, but we’ve got real jobs’. Then, they commissioned the show and they asked us to present it!’

The duo also reflected on the shock from both show fans and contributors alike about how involved they are in the property searching and buying process behind-the-scenes of the show. 

Kirstie and Phil joked that their photo was on a number of fridges after helping families and couples find their dream property up and down the country. 

Kirstie said: ‘It’s such a lovely thing to have a job which means that every time you meet anyone, you can have a conversation about something that really matters to them, it’s a great privilege.’

Advertisement

Phil added: ‘I’ve done several re-visits, which we love doing going back a few years later, and it’s really special to find a picture of us and the crew on the day that we filmed and the day we found their house.’

‘I was talking to an estate agent on Friday, I was negotiating a deal that we made, and at the end I said, ‘Keep my number, if there’s a problem, ring me’… and he said, ‘I thought it was all fake,’ Kirstie added. 

To which Phil again chimed in: ‘I had a couple, we’d done three days filming and we sat in the pub at the end of the show and we were discussing tactics and value and negotiation, and I got my phone out to ring the agent. 

‘They went, ‘Hang on, you’re not actually going to do that are you?”

Advertisement

Kirstie concluded: ‘People think that Phil and I end every working day in a pub, pretending to make a telephone call!’

The pair were also subject to raised eyebrows when Phil failed to attend Kirstie’s wedding back in January 2025

Tying the knot with property tycoon Ben Anderson in a secret ceremony at Mayfair’s Grosvenor Chapel, the star’s co-host was notably absent from the celebrations. 

However, it was later revealed the event was so heavily cloaked in secrecy that even guests were unaware they were attending a wedding until the last minute.

Advertisement

Phil and Kirstie said that while they are great friends of 25 years, they never socialise outside of work.

Speaking in an interview with The Telegraph, Kirstie confessed: ‘We don’t socialise, because we work so much together.’

Phil added: ‘But we’re very, very fond of each other. There’s no one else who’s been through this experience. I put Kirstie among the most important people in my life.’

The pair have been part of each other’s lives through the biggest moments as Kirstie added: ‘In the most significant parts of our lives, we’ve been there for each other. I think Phil was one of the first people I ever told I was pregnant.’

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

What the Great Fire of London can teach us about modern climate change

Published

on

What the Great Fire of London can teach us about modern climate change

A drought lasting months. A blisteringly hot summer that dried up rivers, baked the ground, and made wood as dry as tinder. Warnings of disaster in the face of inaction, ignored for too long, with devastating consequences.

This is not, in fact, the story of climate change and the summer of 2026, but one of the most momentous events in English history. September 2026 marks the 360th anniversary of the Great Fire of London — a conflagration that laid waste to four-fifths of the capital.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

King Charles, Macron and Burnham arrive to view Bayeux Tapestry at British Museum

Published

on

King Charles, President Macron and Queen Camilla looking at the Bayeux Tapestry

The King, speaking inside the Great Court of the British Museum, said the opponents depicted in the tapestry – the Normans and Anglo-Saxons – would have been glad to see this togetherness between France and the UK – “two great nations, which share such fundamental values”.

“The tapestry’s story is one of ambition and uncertainty, of oaths and journeys, of ships, councils, kings, comets and consequences,” said the King.

“Yet it is not merely an English story, nor only a Norman one. Indeed, from the moment of its creation, it may have brought together our two peoples.”

George Osborne, director of the museum, described the displaying of the Bayeux Tapestry as the “most ambitious exhibition we’ve ever mounted”.

Advertisement

President Macron said a loan of this “masterpiece” had first been proposed in the 1930s, but he was delighted that the idea had come to fruition.

He spoke of the loan of the tapestry as an example of how “we are united” and a “reminder of what our countries can do if they join forces”.

Along with the King and Queen he had a chance to see the historic embroidery in the atmospheric darkness of the British Museum.

The 70m (230ft) tapestry, originally embroidered in England but kept for centuries in France, tells the story of the Norman Conquest and the Battle of Hastings in 1066.

Advertisement

King Charles and Queen Camilla, Burnham and his wife Marie-France van Heel, and Macron and wife Brigitte were shown key scenes in the tapestry, including the Coronation of King Harold and his death in battle.

Sending the tapestry to the British Museum had been announced by Macron during the French state visit to the UK in July 2025, as an emblem of the strong partnership between the countries.

There had been some worries that moving the fragile tapestry could risk causing damage, but French government sources said ahead of the royal preview: “The display conditions at the British Museum are ideal.”

The French authorities welcomed the way that visitors in London would see the tapestry lying flat, rather than upright, with this believed to be better for the conservation of the fibres, sewn more than 900 years ago.

Advertisement

It is believed the final scenes of the tapestry have been lost or destroyed, as it has not always had such careful owners. In the 18th Century, during the French Revolution, it was rescued from being cut up to make covers for soldiers’ carts.

At a state banquet hosted by King Charles in Windsor, Macron had said the missing end of the tapestry was a symbol that “in the great mural of Franco-British history, the end is yet to be written – it is up to us to do it”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025