Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

NewsBeat

Is The UK Really Reducing Oil Sanctions On Russia?

Published

on

Is The UK Really Reducing Oil Sanctions On Russia?

Has Keir Starmer really cut back on the UK’s oil sanctions against Russia?

The government is facing intense backlash after reports that Labour decided to water down its penalties against Moscow in response to the emerging oil crisis.

But ministers have robustly rejected accusations that they are easing up on Vladimir Putin. Here’s what you need to know.

Why Are Sanctions Against Russia So Important?

Advertisement

Europe has been trying to wean itself off cheap Russian oil imports to punish Putin after his 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The UK has been leading that charge as a prominent ally to Kyiv. It has repeatedly slapped sanctions on Russian industry to damage its economy and war machine.

It was revealed billions of barrels of fuel were still being imported into the UK through a loophole in the sanctions last October.

The Centre for Research and Clear Air estimated £1.8bn of oil products – made from Russian crude and transported via third countries – imported to the UK since December 2022.

Advertisement

So Labour announced plans back in October to impose a fresh ban on UK imports of diesel and jet fuel made from Russian oil in third countries.

However, the government is now having to deal with a decline in fuel supplies.

Why Is There An Emerging Oil Crisis?

The US’s ongoing conflict in Iran is squeezing global supplies due to the effective blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

Advertisement

More than half of Europe’s jet fuel is transported through the major shipping lane.

Iran’s disruption of that supply means jet fuel prices are almost double what they were before Donald Trump started the war in late February.

So Has The Government Weakened Sanctions?

There were fears Labour had chosen to prioritise the supply jet fuel over its support for Ukraine.

Advertisement

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused the government of “choosing to buy dirty Russian oil” during prime minister’s questions.

She claimed Starmer was “losing his moral compass by backsliding on Ukraine”.

Even Labour MP Emily Thornberry, chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, condemned the government.

She told the BBC: “We’re talking about our allies in Ukraine who have been fighting a war bravely against Russia for years and years with our support, and they have looked to Britain as one of their most important allies. People feel very let down.”

Advertisement

The UK is still issuing a ban on maritime transportation of Russian LNG and related services.

However, the government now plans to “phase in” some of those sanctions in the coming months to mitigate the impacts of the Iran war.

They are introducing a temporary, time-limited licence which means the ban will not come in until January 1.

That licence will still be reviewed regularly, according to the government, but ministers hope that slow approach will reduce instability caused by the Middle East conflict.

Advertisement

The government has rejected claims that this is effectively a waiver on sanctions, like those introduced by the White House earlier this year.

Business and trade minister Chris Bryant told MPs: “We definitely could have communicated this better.”

He added that this policy lies across the Foreign Office and the department for Business and Trade.

“There’s been a bit of miscommunication between departments, and that is entirely my fault and nobody else’s. If anybody wants to have a go, they can just have a go at me,” he said.

Advertisement

“Our sanction regime today was tougher today than it was yesterday or last week,” the minister insisted.

What Does This Mean For UK Support For Ukraine?

The UK is still a leading force in the international goals to pressure Russian economy.

The country signed a G7 statement reaffirming its “unwavering commitment” to impose “severe costs” of Russia on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The sanctions commissioner for Ukraine Vladyslav Vlasiuk said he understood the “rationale behind the UK’s decision”.

However, he said: “Our concern relates specifically to temporary exemptions that may still generate additional revenues for Russia’s war machine.”

Dmyro Lytvyn, communications adviser to Ukrainian president VOlodymyr Zelenskyy also expressed concern over the policy.

He said there was a “highly active communication under way between our diplomats” to understand the new plan.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Bidders sought for historic Stanley council chambers site

Published

on

Bidders sought for historic Stanley council chambers site

The Council Chambers site on Front Street in Stanley is Grade II listed and was first built in 1911. 

The building, which previously housed Stanley Urban District Council, has been included in Historic England’s Heritage Investment Prospectus in the hope that it can be sold. 

Inside, the building remains largely intact with an elegant staircase and hall, and an ornate council chamber. 

The former Stanley Council Chambers on Front Street. (Image: Historic England)

The property is considered suitable for a wide range of uses, including residential, commercial, retail, leisure, community or mixed-use development (subject to planning). 

Advertisement

The site has also been the subject of pre-application discussions and feasibility work, which indicate it is suitable for a range of potential uses, including residential, retail or commercial, food and beverage, or community-based functions.

Stanley is currently benefiting from substantial regeneration activity, including £20 million of Pride in Place funding from the Government and major investment by housing provider Karbon Homes on the former Board School site. 

Initial options for the site proposed by the developer in 2023 included creating a youth hub, housing, a business and community hub, or a community cafe. A mixed-use venue hosting pop-up events and traders was also proposed.  

The former Stanley Council Chambers on Front Street. (Image: Historic England)

Historic England said: “This is strengthening the location’s appeal and reinforcing long-term confidence in the town centre. The building is part of a community that has demonstrated strong involvement in shaping local priorities through the Stanley Strategic Place Plan, with heritage emerging as a key theme.

Advertisement

“With excellent access, strong local amenities and a supportive policy and investment context, the property offers an exceptional opportunity to contribute meaningfully to the ongoing regeneration of Stanley.”

The Heritage Investment Prospectus showcases historic sites and buildings across England, where owners are actively seeking investment partners or buyers.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Freiburg vs Aston Villa LIVE: Europa League final latest score, match stream, goal updates and fan reaction

Published

on

Freiburg vs Aston Villa LIVE: Europa League final latest score, match stream, goal updates and fan reaction

Only Freiburg stand in his way. The German side finished seventh in this year’s Bundesliga and have impressed throughout this campaign, beating the likes of Braga, Celta Vigo, Lille and Nice en route to the final. They were playing second-tier football in Germany just a decade ago but have hardly looked back since winning the 2. Bundesliga in 2016, and today face their first-ever European final.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

25 Years of The Bowl: Hampshire’s 2005 season brings in silverware

Published

on

25 Years of The Bowl: Hampshire’s 2005 season brings in silverware

The highlight of 2005, after 13 barren years, came when Hampshire won silverware by defeating Warwickshire in the C&G Trophy Final at Lord’s. Since they also finished runners-up to County Champions Nottinghamshire, it was a successful season although the Championship conclusion brought frustration.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Face of ‘manipulative’ man jailed for stalking and blackmailing former partner

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

Bayliss lied to the victim’s workplace and said she had stolen drugs and was involved in money laundering.

A man who said he would ensure his victim “doesn’t have another relationship” has been jailed. Christopher Bayliss, 44, of Caroline Hart Walk, Cambridge, threatened to kill himself after finding out his former partner had started dating again.

Advertisement

He hacked into her dating and social media accounts with his behaviour getting worse when she started a new relationship. On November 15, he showed up at the victim’s home and demanded money.

The victim initially refused but later sent £25 to make him leave. At around 4am the following day, he returned and banged on the door threatening to kill himself.

In two days, Bayliss sent 92 WhatsApp messages, left 71 voicemails, and made 32 unanswered calls. He also contacted the victim’s daughter and told her it was her mother’s fault that he turned to drugs and said he would “make sure she doesn’t have another relationship to destroy another man”.

In another call, Bayliss asked the daughter to pass the phone to her mum. He then told her “you need to get the dog; I am going to kill myself” and threatened to destroy her job “so she doesn’t have her friends”.

Advertisement

He went on to blackmail the victim and demanded £50, threatening to contact her employer with false allegations that she had been stealing cash and drugs. He later emailed her workplace and claimed she had stolen drugs and was involved in money laundering.

In four days at the end of November, Bayliss sent over 200 messages and made more than 60 calls and voice messages to the victim. On December 2, he sent a message that he was monitoring her movements and said he assumed she had been suspended as he could see she was not at work.

The victim had left her home and had been staying elsewhere, in fear for her own safety, and parked her car out of sight so he couldn’t find her. Bayliss was arrested later that day.

Bayliss was sentenced to two years and seven months in prison after pleading guilty to stalking involving serious alarm or distress, harassment without violence, and blackmail at Cambridge Crown Court on Thursday, May 14. A charge of controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship, along with a further stalking offence, was ordered to lie on file.

Advertisement

He was also made subject to a ten-year restraining order.

Detective Constable Abbie Ellis, who investigated, said: “Bayliss’ behaviour was relentless, manipulative and deeply distressing for the victim and her family. He used threats, intimidation and harassment in an attempt to control her life even after their relationship had ended.

“Stalking is a serious offence that can have a devastating impact on victims. I would encourage anyone experiencing similar behaviour to report it to police – you will be taken seriously and supported.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Burnopfield biker banned for six months over careless riding

Published

on

Burnopfield biker banned for six months over careless riding

Tristan Gott, 22, Burnopfield, pleaded guilty to the offence when he appeared at Peterlee Magistrates’ Court on Friday, April 10. 

The court was told he was driving a red Yamaha XJ9 on Front Street, Dipton, when he failed to show due care and attention, on November 27, 2025.

Magistrates did not find grounds for “exceptional hardship”, meaning Gott was disqualified from driving for six months under the totting up of penalty points.

Advertisement

He also received three notional penalty points.

A fine of £156 was imposed, with £85 in costs to the Crown Prosecution Service and a £62 victim surcharge.

A collection order was made.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Katie Price issues statement after missing Lee Andrews seen logged into Facebook

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Several people pointed out that they had seen Dubai-based Lee was logged into the Messenger service yesterday – despite going missing days earlier.

Katie Price has responded to claims that her missing husband Lee Andrews has been online using Facebook. Several people pointed out that they had seen Dubai-based Lee was logged into the Messenger service yesterday, despite having disappeared nearly a week earlier after sending a series of chilling messages to his wife Katie.

Former Apprentice star Luisa Zissman was among those posting about him being online even though Katie is desperately trying to find him and fears that she has been kidnapped. Luisa said: “He was seen as active on Facebook Messenger six hours ago which does indicate that his kidnappers are definitely letting him have access to social media.”

However, Katie tonight insisted that it was her causing his Facebook account to appear as active to people around the world. She shared a screenshot of his page writing: “I have Lee’s Facebook it’s not him on this it’s me.” The profile showed Lee’s 13,000 followers, location as Dubai and bio describing himself as an “Investor CEO” and “Married to the beautiful Katie Price.”

Advertisement

READ MORE: Lee Andrews LIVE: ‘Proof’ Katie Price’s husband has been on his phone since ‘kidnap’READ MORE: Katie Price fears husband Lee Andrews could be missing ‘for years’

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

French Open 2026: Players to cut short pre-tournament media after 15 mins as pay row goes on

Published

on

The Coupe des Mousquetaires and Coupe Suzanne Lenglen

The players’ campaign, which began in late 2025, is being spearheaded by former WTA chairman and chief executive Larry Scott.

The American will be in Paris on Friday for a meeting with French Open tournament director Amelie Mauresmo and FFT president Gilles Moretton.

Meetings are also planned with representatives of the All England Club (AELTC) and the US Tennis Association later in the fortnight.

The players’ action is designed to put pressure on the AELTC, with prize money for Wimbledon not due to be announced for another three weeks.

Advertisement

Last year, the Wimbledon prize fund rose by 7% to £53.5m – double the amount on offer a decade earlier.

Players look enviously, however, at the revenues generated by the Grand Slams and feel entitled to a larger slice of the cake.

The AELTC’s financial statement for the year to July 2025 showed revenue of £427m and profit after tax of £39.7m.

Players have asked the Slams to pay 22% of their revenue in prize money by 2030.

Advertisement

They are also asking that tens of millions of dollars are paid towards pension, healthcare and maternity benefits, and that they are consulted more widely on scheduling and other key decisions.

At this month’s Italian Open, world number one Aryna Sabalenka said she believes players will “at some point” boycott one of the majors.

World number three Iga Swiatek felt that would be a “bit extreme”, but defending French Open champion Coco Gauff said she would support strike action “if everyone were to move as one and collaborate”.

Men’s world number one Jannik Sinner also claimed players are not getting the respect they deserve when it comes to prize money at the majors.

Advertisement

An FFT statement on Wednesday read: “We regret the players’ decision, which impacts all of the tournament’s stakeholders: the media, broadcasters, the FFT and the entire tennis community, all of whom follow each edition of Roland Garros with great enthusiasm.

“The French Tennis Federation recognises the importance of the players’ contribution to the tournament’s success, and wishes to maintain close ties with them.”

The French Open takes place from 24 May to 7 June.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

West London shop fined for hiring illegal worker and paying them below minimum wage

Published

on

West London shop fined for hiring illegal worker and paying them below minimum wage

Additionally, an inspection of a white van parked outside, which males were seen unloading into the shop, contained 820 illicit cigarettes and two 50g pouches of roll-your-own tobacco hidden in the glove box and a shopping bag. The family says this was not to be sold, rather they were “just holding onto it for someone else, but we took the blame”.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Sex offender dies in cell at Cambridgeshire prison

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

A decision to apply and leave restraints on the prisoner overnight while he was in hospital was found to be “not justified”

A sex offender serving a sentence at a Cambridgeshire prison died in his cell. Peter Williams died aged 67 on August 3, 2025 while serving his sentence at HMP Littlehey in Perry, according to a recent report.

Advertisement

Williams was sentenced to Imprisonment for Public Protection with a minimum of three years for a sexual offence in August 2010. In June 2019, Williams was diagnosed with prostate cancer.

In March 2022, was transferred to HMP Littlehey. Despite undergoing surgery and chemotherapy, Williams’ cancer progressed and in May 2025, it was deemed that chemotherapy was no longer effective.

On May 12, Williams was escorted to hospital by two officers who applied an escort chain. According to the report, Williams complained about the cuffs being too tight. No evidence was found to show that anyone adjusted the handcuffs.

The following day the restraints were removed and Williams later returned to prison on May 17. His health continued to deteriorate and on August 3, Williams died in his cell.

Advertisement

A family member was contacted by a family liaison officer. A report by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman stated that Williams died of advanced bladder cancer.

A clinical review identified that a decision to apply and leave restraints on Williams until the following day was “not justified”. The report said managers responsible for authorising restraints should consider the healthcare and base their decision on the actual risk the prisoner poses at the time.

Authorising Managers have also received training to assess the correct level of restraint for all escorts. A Prison Service spokesperson said: “Following the recommendations made by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, HMP Littlehey has improved restraint procedures by increasing training and oversight”.

A clinical reviewer found no evidence that Williams was discussed in a Palliative Care Team multi-disciplinary meeting, in line with the Littlehey Palliative Care Protocol. Due to this, it was recommended that the Head of Healthcare ensures patients with “complex health needs” are discussed in a meeting.

Advertisement

The Ministry of Justice said it is continuing to work closely with healthcare providers to ensure all relevant information is shared and properly recorded. The clinical reviewer concluded that the care Williams received at the prison was of a “reasonable standard” and “equivalent to that which he could have expected to receive in the community”.

An inquest into his death was held on March 23, 2026. The coroner concluded that Williams died from natural causes.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘It is your worst nightmare’ Parent of child victim speaks out after online predator jailed

Published

on

Belfast Live

A parent of one of the victims of a man jailed over sex offences broke their silence with a harrowing statement on the impact the offender’s actions had on their child

The parent of a young boy targeted by a sick online sexual predator has told how the child has been “stripped entirely of his innocence whilst the perpetrator preyed on him and tortured him – both mentally and psychologically”.

The harrowing testimony emerged after Cameron Mullen, 22, was sentenced to two years and four months for seven counts of online child sexual offences. He will also subjected to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order for ten years.

Following the sentencing at Dungannon Crown Court, the parent said: “It’s every parent’s worst nightmare to experience what I did.

Advertisement

“It hurt me immensely to see my child stripped entirely of his innocence whilst the perpetrator preyed on him and tortured him, both mentally and psychologically.

READ MORE: Police launch malicious communications probe after Co Antrim schools and businesses targetedREAD MORE: Man who ‘hadn’t got round to completing driving test’ three years after move to NI has car seized

“He was continually coerced to show indecent images and be shown explicit content. Please be vigilant if your child has a smartphone as we often believe they are safe. The internet is not a safe place and it can have detrimental consequences if your own child is subjected to what my child seen and was asked to do online. “It could prove to have fatal consequences given the nature of these conversations and images that they are subjected to while communicating with others. Safeguarding our children is paramount from these predators attacking another innocent child and possibly leaving devastating consequences.”

The charges Mullen, from Kilrea in Co Derry, faced included sexual communication with a child, adult causing or inciting child between 13 and 16 to engage in sexual activity, incitement to distribute indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of a child and adult causing a child to watch a sexual act.

Advertisement

Detective Chief Inspector David McBurney said: “This case demonstrates how offenders can use online platforms to gain a child’s trust before quickly steering conversations to a sexual nature to satisfy their own sexual perversions.

“It is sickening that we are seeing younger and younger offenders in this space. Mullen deliberately built a rapport with these young boys before rapidly turning the conversation and this is a common tactic that we are seeing by those who seek to exploit young people in our communities. “This behaviour is manipulative and predatory, and it will not be tolerated. Protecting children and young people from sexual exploitation remains a top priority for us and we will continue to robustly pursue those who seek to harm children online. “We continue to urge parents and guardians to remain vigilant about their children’s online activity and to encourage open conversations about staying safe online. Anyone who believes a child may be at risk should report their concerns to police so we can take action as we did in this case. “Let this serve as another warning to those perpetrating child sexual abuse in our communities, we are working every day to break down reporting barriers and encourage victims to come forward. You will be caught, your lies uncovered and you will face the full force of the law.”

PSNI revealed that in early January 2025, officers received a report from a parent in the Mid Ulster region about an individual who they believed was making sexual communications with their child via the internet.

Advertisement

Police quickly made enquiries which led to a suspect being identified and Mullen was just arrested days later on suspicion of carrying out a number of offences.

He was interviewed then charged to court after an investigation discovered mobile phone triage identified that he had contacted a number of young teenage boys via Instagram.

A file was submitted to the Public Prosecution Service and prosecution directed in respect of three victims, who were under the age of 16 at the time of the offending.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025