TWIN FALLS, Idaho (AP) — An employee was among three people killed in a shooting at an In-N-Out Burger restaurant in southern Idaho, the fast-food chain’s owner said.

“My heart is broken, my chest is heavy, my eyes burn from the tears I’ve shed. We lost one of our beautiful Associates tonight,” In-N-Out owner Lynsi Snyder said in a statement released early Sunday on social media. “In-N-Out will be mourning with the families and praying for them as they tread through a very painful season.”

The FBI on Sunday encouraged the public to submit images and videos related to the shooting Saturday in Twin Falls that left seven other people wounded, some critically.

The In-N-Out had opened just about a week earlier, on July 24, as part of the California-based company’s recent expansion to Idaho.

Authorities are notifying victims’ relatives

Snyder did not identify the worker. Officials were still trying to notify relatives of victims and so were not yet releasing the names, ages or other details about the people hurt in the shooting, Twin Falls spokesperson Josh Palmer said Saturday.

Police who responded to the shooting found the body of the suspected gunman in an area near the restaurant, Palmer said. He did not know if the suspect was included in the fatality count. Some of the people injured were in critical condition, Palmer said.

Police were still trying to determine the shooter’s identity and motive, Twin Falls Police Chief Matthew Hicks said in a news conference earlier Saturday.

“We believe the threat to the community is over,” Hicks said. “It was a very chaotic scene.”

Another police briefing was planned for Sunday afternoon.

Palmer said investigators were interviewing witnesses to the shooting. The restaurant is in a busy shopping plaza, and hundreds of people were in the area when it happened around 2 p.m.

Witnesses describe chaotic scene

Lane Koehn, 34, said he was at a stoplight near the In-N-Out when he saw a person with an AR-style rifle emerge from the drive-thru. A man with a pistol started firing at the shooter.

He then saw someone in an In-N-Out uniform drag a person, also wearing a uniform, bleeding from a gunshot wound to her chest across the parking lot. The employee, Koehn and the man with the pistol stayed until paramedics arrived for her.

There have been more claims about Reform UK and its finances. In fact, it has become so complicated that it’s easy to forget party leader Nigel Farage has a byelection battle on his hands.

A £5 million undeclared gift from billionaire Christopher Harborne was the catalyst for Farage’s resignation as MP for Clacton – which sparked the byelection. Many observers thought his resignation was a bid to pre-empt a ruling from the parliamentary standards commissioner.

Farage has denied this, but has now suggested to journalists that he should perhaps have “filled in a piece of paper” in connection with the money.

À lire aussi :
Five questions over Nigel Farage’s £5 million donation

Separate to this, police are reportedly investigating £500,000 given to the party by the mother of convicted fraudster and long-time Farage associate George Cottrell in the lead-up to the 2024 election. They are also said to be investigating £500,000 in donations from Britain Means Business – a company owned by Reform MP Richard Tice – made following a £1 million payment to the company from Fiona Cottrell.

It has now been reported that Cottrell made transfers totalling more than US$2 million (£1.49 million) to his mother just days before she donated to both Reform and Britain Means Business.

The police investigations relate to a potential breach of electoral law – the offence of attempting to evade the restrictions on donations under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.

The specific sections of the act concern permissibility, or who is allowed to give money to political parties. Fiona Cottrell, Tice and Britain Means Business are “permissible donors”. But according to reports, it is unclear if Montenegro-based Cottrell is eligible to donate to a UK political party.

The only time that someone has been convicted of similar offences since the act was passed was in the case of Gary Platt and Conservative MP David Mackintosh. Platt had attempted to hide the provenance of £10,000 donated to Mackintosh’s constituency association, and was given a suspended seven-week jail term. Four other men were also convicted, but Mackintosh was not.

So previously, when police have investigated donations under these sections of the act, it has related to perceived attempts to hide the provenance of a donation. One reason that someone might do this is if the money came from an impermissible donor – but someone needn’t necessarily be an impermissible donor to have committed an offence.

Also folded into the parliamentary investigations are “in-kind” benefits received from Cottrell ranging from security and housing, through to staffing (and advice) for Farage’s social media campaigns.

These were given before Farage became an MP, but within the one-year “declarable period” (like the Harborne gift). Farage has said that these benefits were “totally undeclarable” because he was an influencer as opposed to being in frontline politics.

But in May 2024 Farage described himself as Reform’s “honorary president”. So this casts doubt on the claim. And why these benefits were not registered, when £9,253.60 from Cottrell for travel, security and accommodation to attend a conference in Belgium within the same period, was.

The crux of the Cottrell case is the question of “use”. If, as has been reported, some of these in-kind benefits went towards social media messaging that promoted Reform, it feels like quite tough sledding to claim they had little to do with party politics.

Lawyers for George Cottrell have said he “categorically disputes” the allegations about financial help for Farage. Fiona Cottrell is understood not to have commented on the claims.

What it means for Reform

An important thing to note is that the legal onus rests almost entirely on the donor. The party in receipt of the donation simply needs to show that it has conducted a permissibility check on them.

In the case of Reform, some of its biggest donors (like Tice) are effectively woven into the party apparatus. This makes it much harder for the party to be seen to be one step removed from the money.

The question of the £5 million from Harborne remains one for the commissioner. That work is now paused pending the outcome of the byelection. But if Farage wins in Clacton, the commissioner will be making a judgment on three main things: the motive of the giver, what the gift was used for, and whether Farage had any doubt as to whether the money should have been registered.

Of these three, much less attention has been paid to the judgment on Farage’s doubts about the need to register it. But the MPs’ code of conduct is clear: “if there is any doubt, the benefit should be registered.”

This may yet become one of the hinge points. While it is hard to prove whether someone had doubt about something, Farage’s own statements suggest he did. Talking to the Triggernometry podcast, Farage said he had asked a “top international lawyer”, who advised him not to declare it. This could be seen to indicate at least some doubt.

Another question is why Farage asked a lawyer in the first place. There are parliamentary authorities whose job it is to know whether something is declarable.

These stories remain dangerous for Reform. Headlines about a Bitcoin tycoon giving £5 million to Reform while its policy looks kindly on cryptocurrency cut through with the public. Just before the Makerfield byelection, polling showed that when voters saw messaging about the £5 million and this was linked to Reform’s policies on cryptocurrency its vote share dipped by 4%.

Farage might think that failures to fill in bits of paper are trivial. But he must get this right because his personal ratings do him no favours. In the latest YouGov polling he nets out with 65% of people having an unfavourable opinion of him, compared to 25% having a favourable opinion.

Politicians are rarely popular, but this -40 for Farage compares badly with Andy Burnham’s -4 (and is quite close to Keir Starmer’s -45). For the new prime minister, this will almost certainly come down, but Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is also ahead of Farage on -15.

So, while Farage might win over the voters of Clacton, this is not a good measure of the country. To address the Burnham bounce, Farage needs to meet British voters where they are when it comes to standards in public life. Even if that means filling out pieces of paper now and again.

You’ve checked your passport is valid, bought travel insurance and packed your beachwear. But changing pounds for cash in the currency of your destination has fallen down your to-do list. The good news is you need not pay over the odds in foreign transaction fees, or a huge commission on currency exchange at the airport.

Big banks such as Lloyds, TSB and Halifax charge as much as 2.99 per cent on card transactions abroad, which works out at nearly £30 on every £1,000 spent. But there’s a range of banks that don’t charge any such fees and it takes minutes to open an account with them.

This doesn’t have to affect your existing bank accounts, although you may be offered a juicy bonus if you switch your current account to a new provider. In some cases you can use the new digital card within minutes of setting it up via the bank’s smartphone app.

Here are the best cards for holiday spending, who they suit – and what to watch out for when making payments abroad.

Best bank overall for travellers

First Direct has zero fees on overseas spending and cash withdrawals using its debit card, and the £250 interest-free overdraft it offers is useful in an emergency.

The bank also gives those prepared to switch their current account a £175 bonus. But a switch takes seven working days and it may take more than a month to get the bonus.

You’ll get instant access to your current account when approved and a virtual card to use straight away. First Direct says that 99 per cent of customers receive their physical card within six days.

The bank is well-rated for customer service. In the latest survey of banking customers produced for the Competition and Markets Authority, 74 per cent said they would recommend First Direct to friends and family – placing the bank fourth for overall quality.

Rachel Springall, a finance expert at rate scrutineer Moneyfacts, says First Direct’s customer service is ‘high standard, with 24/7 phone support, so that should give customers peace of mind if they run into any problems’.

Best pre-paid card for exchange rate

When using your usual debit or credit card abroad, you normally get Mastercard or Visa’s exchange rate depending on your bank’s preferred payment network.

These are set once a day at a fraction above the rates stated by the European Central Bank.

The rates offered by the two card providers tend to be similar. For example on July 28, Mastercard would have converted £1,000 to €1,170.55, while Visa would have converted the sum to €1,173.53, not factoring in any bank fees. This is a difference of €2.98.

But you can also use something called the interbank rate – the live rate at which banks exchange currencies. As this is a real-time rate, this can sometimes work out better than the rates set by Visa and Mastercard.

Investment platform Trading 212 offers a pre-paid card that uses the interbank exchange rate. You’d need to spend thousands to notice any savings but the main benefits of Trading 212’s card lie elsewhere. There’s no foreign transaction fee in using the card abroad and you can withdraw up to £400 a month in cash for free.

You can also earn 3.8 per cent interest on your cash. It costs £4.95 to have a physical card delivered. The virtual card is free and can be used immediately once you open an account.

The number one rule with exchange rates is to avoid using airport services to switch currency at the last minute.

And when faced with the choice of paying in pounds or the local currency at an ATM on your trip, experts say choose the local currency. This swerves an expensive mark-up from a foreign bank.

The best credit card for travel

Credit card providers charge as much as 2.99 per cent on foreign transactions. Some levy an even higher fee on cash withdrawals, such as 3.99 per cent with a Tesco credit card – on top of a 2.75 per cent foreign exchange fee.

If you need to take out £500 in the local currency, using this card to do so would cost you £33.70.

You can find credit cards that don’t charge either of these fees.

One top pick is the Lloyds Ultra Credit Card. There are no foreign transaction or cash withdrawal fees, plus you can earn a good 1 per cent cashback on all card purchases in the first year.

The interest rate is a relatively low 14.9 per cent on purchases but this is a representative rate that not everyone receives. You should get your card in five to seven working days and Lloyds says you should see your card details in the app in ‘just a few days’ – from there you can use it digitally by adding it to Apple or Google Pay.

A couple of pointers with credit cards. When it comes to cash withdrawals, unlike the grace period that you have to clear your balance on purchases, interest is charged from the moment you have the money in your hands.

When applying for a credit card, you should check eligibility first. It won’t affect your credit history.

Holidaymakers also benefit from additional protection if they buy with a credit card. Any goods or services not received which are valued between £100 and £30,000 are covered under section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act.

With the Lloyds Ultra Credit Card, there are no foreign transaction or cash withdrawal fees

Advertisement

Best app-based bank for travel

Digital challenger banks such as Chase, Monzo and Starling have become popular with travellers because they don’t charge foreign transaction fees.

They’re app-based so it takes a matter of minutes to open an account on your phone and you can usually start using your card straight away by adding it to your digital wallet. However, there are usually restrictions on how much cash you can withdraw.

Starling offers more flexibility on taking out money. You can withdraw up to £300 and make up to six withdrawals a day. Chase lets you withdraw £500 a day but has a £1,500 monthly limit when abroad. You can withdraw £400 fee-free every 30 days in the UK and Europe with Monzo’s standard account. There’s no restriction if Monzo is your main bank.

Kate Steere, from comparison website Finder, says: ‘If you’re after a slick app with genuinely useful budgeting tools like Spaces for saving for your holiday and Settle Up for splitting expenses, Starling is the one to go for.’

When withdrawing cash, try to keep costs low by finding ATMs operated by local banks. You’ll often be charged a flat fee but this can be lower at these branches.

As children we would look forward to the long stretch of summer spent in Harlyn Bay in North Cornwall where we spent hours swimming and rockpooling.

We would drive down from our home in Bisley in the Cotswolds, the same village as Jilly Cooper.

And we weren’t the only ones. Cornwall was practically Cotswolds-on-Sea in those days with the whole Gloucestershire set making their way down, many of whom may have inspired some of my good friend Jilly’s characters.

Friends would come and stay and we would occasionally go to the Trevose Golf Club disco but most of the time we were knee-deep in sand and dogs – it was all very Famous Five. The adults would chat in the sand dunes with flasks of tea and watch their offspring frolic on the beach, and POSSIBLY got up to some shenanigans themselves.

Back then Harlyn Bay was referred to as ‘The Other Side’, with Polzeath and Rock being the places to be. When we got a bit older we would beg my poor mother to drive us 40 minutes (there was no ferry at night) round to The Mariner’s Pub in Rock where a bunch of blonde and shiny teens would drink until Mummy and Daddy came to collect them.

Eventually my mother gave up driving to ‘The Other Side’ and started looking into holiday rentals there instead to save her the midnight hassle. We swapped one sandy holiday cottage for another and had a whale of a time, going back year after year.

Cornwall was practically Cotswolds-on-Sea back in those days with the whole Gloucestershire set making their way down, writes Sybilla Hart

When I started having children, however, I knew it wouldn’t be long before we had to ditch this part of Posh Cornwall – I used to joke that you can’t mix infant bottles with beer bottles. It had become more and more of a party destination, which was not something I needed when I was more invested in Sudocrem than Sambuca.

We tried the south of Cornwall but got a bit put off by the adders on Kynance Cove and the jagged drops around The Lizard which looked like a recipe for broken legs (and the rest).

Plus everyone was in tears by the time we got to Bristol – Cornwall was just too far from Essex so in the end we had to ditch it.

So when I read that Polzeath is the epicentre of a real-life version of the cocktail Sex on the Beach, I felt more than a little relieved at my choice of Norfolk as a holiday destination. For Norfolk is the new Cornwall, at least among the grown-up smart set. It’s far more civilised and authentic than its southern counterpart, which has become raucous, downmarket and a bit last season.

Now that I am responsible for no fewer than three teenagers it is a blessing that we are not in Polzeath which I hear is transformed into a drunken playground by night for two weeks in July – with residents having to appoint a ‘beach ranger’ to patrol them.

Here in north Norfolk you are more likely to bump into a seal on the beach than a drunken teenager and most of the people who holiday in Cley-next-the-Sea are young families or retired people.

My children have made some friends over the years and occasionally sit in someone’s boat at night while sharing a can of Tesco Pear Cider but that is about the extent of it.

Norfolk, as I have come to realise, is just as smart as Cornwall but miles less populated. There’s no battling the crowds to find a tiny sliver of free sand to lie your towel down on, as you have to in Polzeath these days. The posh villages in Norfolk vary hugely and I find the best way to describe them is by comparison to London boroughs.

For example, Blakeney is like Richmond, well-heeled, beautiful with fantastic walks. Burnham Market is Norfolk’s version of Belgravia and has all the shops and smart restaurants.

Burnham Market in Norfolk is appreciated for its shops and smart restaurants – in a similar way to Belgravia in London

The Gunton Arms, found four miles from the beaches of Norfolk coast, is an award-winning traditional pub and restaurant

Advertisement

Brancaster is Fulham, full of families and labradors walking on the beach. Burnham Overy Staithe is Chelsea-on-Sea and full of blonde teenagers wearing the same clothes messing about on boats.

Cromer is more like Hackney, Holt is Barnes and finally, Hunstanton with its famous tennis tournament is best described as Norfolk’s answer to Clapham.

The restaurants in Norfolk are a case of Rick Stein eat your heart out with The Gunton Arms near Cromer scoring high as well as The Moorings in Blakeney, and we’re spoilt for choice when it comes to nice cafes selling flat whites.

There are hidden beaches to be found at low tide with only a tern for company; mudflats that look like works of art; windmills peppering the horizon and you can almost imagine former Norfolk resident Admiral Nelson striding out of the waves towards a centuries-old watering hole.

On the beaches you will find pebbles instead of beer bottles, shells instead of discarded vapes.

And the only creatures I’ve seen copulating on Norfolk beaches are the birds.

Mosquitoes and midges can ruin even the chicest of getaways, triggering a raft of holiday woes – namely the itchy, sore, unsightly, insect bites that can be enough to make the most body-confident want to cover up.

Keeping bugs at bay used to mean spritzing on insect repellent formulas laced with DEET, a chemical-formula that, while it does the job, melts your nail polish and smells dire too.

Until now. Luxury French fragrance house Diptyque has gone viral on social media because fans of its limited-edition Citronnelle & Geranium Summer Body Spray say it not only keeps bugs away but also smells divine. Which you’d hope, given it has a £52 price tag.

It’s all down to the added essential oils such as lemon eucalyptus and lemongrass, which are said to have inset-repelling properties.

Diptyque isn’t the only one; this summer sees a raft of body sprays and fragrances with natural bug-deterring benefits hitting the market. But do natural insect repellents really work?

‘Plant-based repellents with extracts like citronella, eucalyptus, lavender and verbena contain naturally occurring compounds which can disrupt the scent cues mosquitoes, midges and other biting insects use to identify us humans as targets, making it harder for them to locate us,’ explains GP and aesthetics doctor Ahmed El Muntasar.

Chemical formulas made with DEET also work in the same way. So how do natural formulas – which, let’s face it, smell infinitely better – compare? ‘Many natural repellents evaporate more quickly than chemical formulas, so they need to be reapplied more frequently – every couple of hours,’ says Dr El Muntasar.

The type of protection you choose should also be determined by your destination.

‘If you’re travelling where mosquito-borne illnesses such as malaria, dengue, chikungunya or Zika are a concern I’d recommend choosing a repellent with proven longer-lasting protection,’ he says, ‘However, for general everyday use in the UK natural repellents can be a reasonable option.’

Here, I test the latest luxe natural bug sprays to see which are worth the investment…

Diptyque Citronnelle & Geranium Summer Body Spray (£52 for 100ml, johnlewis.co.uk)

This bougie body spray went viral for a reason. If you’re not keen on the medicinal scent of citronella (the telltale essential oil in many mozzie-repelling products) this fragrance relies on lemongrass and lemon eucalyptus, which studies show is one of the most effective natural repellents. The scent is a summery blend of lemongrass, geranium, neroli, lemon eucalyptus and orange blossom, so wearing it feels more like a sophisticated cologne than a bug repellent.

I stowed this in my hand luggage for a weekend away and didn’t feel the need to pack a separate perfume – which goes some way to mitigating the price.

The scent lasts only a couple of hours so it needed topping up regularly, but after spritzing it on my arms and legs I had no bites.

Neals Yard Remedies Citronella Formula Body Spray (£15 for 100ml, nealsyardremedies.com)

A family barbecue was the ultimate test for this citrussy body spray and it was a hit – not only did it look chic on the table, it smelled gorgeous and no one complained about midge bites.

Yes, it does smell slightly medicinal (the main fragrance note is definitely citronella) but it’s quickly tempered by other insect-repelling essential oils like lavender and eucalyptus, plus skin-soothing witch hazel, so it errs on the side of sophistication.

Avon Skin So Soft Original Dry Oil Spray (£6 for 150ml, avon.uk.com)

This lightly-hydrating body oil spray has such rave reviews online about its insect-repelling abilities it’s becoming a cult classic. Apparently, it’s the added citronellol and limone that staves off the bugs.

I liked the soft, almost baby-powdery fragrance that didn’t interfere with my usual perfume and how it left a subtle, glowy sheen on my limbs, too.

My daughter – the person in our family mosquitoes seem to love most – still gets the odd bite using this, but nowhere near as many as she does without it. The only drawback is the oil-based formula might not appeal to everyone. But for £6 it’s a no-brainer.

Le Labo Eucalyptus 20 Eau de Parfum (£172 for 50ml, libertylondon.com)

Advertisement

If you really can’t bear bug sprays, devotees of this chic, woody and eucalyptus-driven fragrance say it also helps deter insects. It’s not for the faint-hearted – an intense, aromatic eau de parfum that lasts a long time on the skin (I could still detect a whiff next morning).

After liberally spraying this, I wasn’t bothered by any bugs on an evening walk by a river. The price takes some justifying, but given this is fine fragrance rather than insect repellent you’re covering both bases with one bottle.