The nurse told a jury she was shown a mobile phone video of the baby boy which made her feel ‘uneasy’
One of the men on trial over the death of a baby Preston Davey remarked to a nurse that medics would ‘think they were abusing’ him, jurors have been told.
Jamie Varley, 37, and John McGowan-Fazackerly, 32, are charged with a string of offences against 13-month-old Preston, who they were in the process of adopting. He died after being taken to Blackpool Victoria Hospital at 7.15pm on July 27, 2023.
Mr Varley is accused of murder; sexual assault of a child under 13; inflicting grievous bodily harm; five counts of child cruelty; and further counts of making, taking and distributing indecent images.
Click here to hear the latest from Manchester’s courts in our newsletter
Mr McGowan-Fazackerley is accused of causing or allowing the death of a child; two counts of child cruelty; and sexual assault of a child under 13. Both men deny the charges against them and are currently on trial at Preston Crown Court.
On Thursday (May 14), the trial heard evidence from Nikki Wilson, a staff nurse who was on duty at Blackpool Victoria Hospital during a previous occasion Preston was brought in, June 30, 2023.
Ms Wilson said Preston was with two adult men, a ‘taller’ man and a ‘larger’ man and that Preston had a ‘bump or bruise’ to one side of his head.
“One of them stated that the hospital would think they were abusing the child” Ms Wilson said, adding she ‘can’t remember’ which of the men made the comment.
“They were raising a previous admission that he had come in on” she continued. She said the pair showed her a video on a mobile phone which showed Preston sat in front of an ‘activity block’ which she said they told her he had got as a birthday present.
She said the video, which was shown to the jury, showed that Preston ‘went to pull himself up’ and ‘you could see it tip.’ It ‘ended there’ and there was ‘no sound’ when she viewed it, she said, adding she ‘didn’t see anyone else on the video other than Preston.’
She said the video made her feel ‘uneasy.’ “For me, personally, when you see something tip you would automatically run to stop it from tipping over” she said. Adding: “I just think you would have run to the child when you saw it tipping over.”
Under cross-examination from Nick Johnson KC, representing Mr Varley, she confirmed she believed the mens’ behaviour in the hospital was ‘appropriate and caring’ towards the baby boy.
Earlier, a forensic pathologist who carried out a post-mortem on Preston said she did not believe injuries she discovered were caused by attempts to resuscitate him.
Dr Alison Armour concluded the cause of his death was acute upper airways obstruction, caused by either smothering or an object being inserted into his mouth, the jury were earlier told.
During cross-examination, Mr Johnson took her through a number of the more than 40 separate internal and external injuries she found during her examination.
Being questioned by Mr Johnson, she described a bruise found at the back of Preston’s throat as ‘unusual.’ When asked if it could have been caused during the attempts to save Preston’s life, Dr Armour said: “I find it very difficult to accept this bruise was caused by medical instrumentation.”
She said that she ‘cannot accept the logic’ of the proposition that the ‘extensive’ bruise was caused by intubation when there was ‘no bruising to any other resuscitative mark.’
‘There is no evidence that this child choked on vomit’, pathologist tells jury
When asked about ‘linear’ bruising to Preston’s thigh, she said it was ‘consistent with a slap.’ When it was put to her by Mr Johnson it was ‘consistent with a firm grip’, Dr Armour replied: “That’s inconsistent with a grip.” Adding: “If this baby does not have cardiac output, those bruises are not due to any handling or resuscitation.”
Dr Armour said 14 bruises she found to Preston’s head and face were ‘consistent with fingertip pressure.’ She said many of them were ‘difficult to interpret’ as ‘you don’t see them on the skin.’
She agreed with Mr Johnson there were no bruises around the mouth, but added ‘that’s not where you get fingertip bruises in the cases of smothering of a child.’
Asked during re-examination by prosecutor Peter Wright KC if she had considered if any of the injuries found on Preston were caused by attempts at resuscitation, she said: “That’s not my position at all sir.”
She said that although she found Preston had inhaled vomit into his lungs, this was not the cause of his death. “There is no evidence that this child choked on vomit. It has gone into the lungs, and it was a recent event” she said, adding: “This was not the cause of death. It has happened for a reason. It was not the reason Preston Davey died.”
When it was put to her by Mr Johnson that she could not ‘reasonably exclude’ it as a possible cause of death, she replied that there ‘has to be a reason for it’, adding that a conclusion that he had died as the result of ‘aspiration of stomach contents’ would have been ‘unacceptable.’
Both men, of Staining Avenue, Blackpool, deny all charges brought against them. The trial, scheduled to last around six weeks, continues.Proceeding

You must be logged in to post a comment Login