Some Netflix viewers have been left distracted by what they say is a glaring error
The film’s lead actress has already responded to criticism from fans.
Viewers of Netflix’s latest adventure offering have found themselves distracted by what they consider an unmissable continuity error. Enola Holmes 3 was recently added to the streaming giant, continuing the popular film franchise.
It marks the third chapter in the series produced exclusively for the platform, which first launched back in 2020. According to its official synopsis, detective Enola Holmes is swept into an adventure in Malta, where personal and professional ambitions collide on a case more complex and dangerous than any she has previously encountered.
Stranger Things actress Millie Bobby Brown returns to once again portray the titular protagonist Enola Holmes. She is joined by House of Guiness actor Louis Partridge, reprising his role as love interest Teweksbury, while former Superman and Witcher star Henry Cavill returns as Enola’s brother and renowned detective Sherlock Holmes.
The latest instalment has failed to generate the same critical acclaim as its predecessors, which achieved scores of 91% and 93% on Rotten Tomatoes respectively. Enola Holmes 3 has so far garnered a considerably lower rating of just 73%, reports the Mirror.
Despite this, certain viewers are more preoccupied with what they perceive as a significant production blunder. One particular scene, set against a Maltese backdrop, shows Enola cautiously peering around a corner.
Rather than remaining immersed in the tension of the moment, audiences were quick to spot that Millie’s character — who inhabits the Victorian era — appears to be sporting gel nails. One supporter posted on social media the photograph with the description: “Enola Holmes taking place in 1885 while Millie’s nails giving full 2026 gel manicure.”
Someone responded: “Period pieces fail the second modern beauty standards leak in. Audiences read authenticity through tiny details now.”
Prior to the film’s premiere, Millie had already addressed the backlash. Speaking to the BBC, she stated: “How bleak and boring of the internet, I love a good manicure and so does Enola. I wasn’t disappointed but I was like, oh OK, that’s what the articles are about. But then again, the internet does not surprise me these days. I’ve been through it on the internet.”
Meanwhile, the film’s director Philip Barantini, who also directed award-winning miniseries Adolescence, has revealed he didn’t concern himself with “small things”.
He continued: “Maybe they do for some people but it made me laugh. We just live in a world where everyone is hyper-aware and they find something to zone in on, and it becomes a huge thing.”
Some supporters have defended the production’s error as they recognise it has never claimed to be historically precise. After all, the stories are adapted from the book series published between 2006 and 2023 rather than genuine historical occurrences.
A piece in The Guardian suggests that archaeologists have unearthed Egyptian mummies (dating to 5,000 BC) with gilded nails and henna-tinted fingertips as well as a solid gold manicure set in southern Babylonia, dating to 3,200 BC, that was seemingly part of combat equipment. So perhaps the inclusion of nail art in Enola Holmes 3 is not quite as historically inaccurate as it initially appears, even if gel sets were not specifically in use during the 1880s.
However, one fan pointed out: “The polish itself isn’t really a problem, it’s that that kind of colour and gloss were not ‘in’ in Britain at the time and would not be for a while. It’s less of a technological issue and more of a ‘applying 21st century fashion standards to a time where the rules were different’ issue, which is like super duper common in historical fiction films in general”.
Enola Holmes 3 is streaming on Netflix.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login