Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

NewsBeat

Vance’s push to get Iran talks started hits an early bump

Published

on

Vance's push to get Iran talks started hits an early bump

ZURICH (AP) — The U.S. push to quickly begin high-stakes talks with Iran hit a snag just two days after the signing of an agreement that opens a 60-day window for negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program and getting oil traffic moving through the Strait of Hormuz back to prewar levels.

Vice President JD Vance had been prepared to make an overnight flight Friday to meet with his Iranian counterparts at a mountainside resort in the tiny Swiss village of Obbürgen and begin the technical talks.

His staff and a small pack of journalists had even gathered at Joint Base Andrews outside Washington in anticipation of the trip. Meanwhile, dozens of White House officials, advance staffers and more media gathered in Switzerland to prepare for Vance’s anticipated arrival.

But then abruptly on Thursday evening the trip was called off — at least for the time being.

Advertisement

The White House issued a statement explaining Vance — who has been tapped by President Donald Trump to lead the negotiations — and his delegation were prepared for talks, but they were unable to finalize plans and the vice president would remain in Washington.

“The logistics of these negotiations have never been simple or predictable,” the statement noted.

Fighting in southern Lebanon intensifies

The announcement followed a report from Al-Mayadeen, a Pan-Arab satellite channel that is politically allied with the Iranian-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, that Iran was delaying sending its delegation to Switzerland over Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Lebanon.

Fighting intensified with at least 18 killed by Israeli airstrikes, while four Israeli soldiers were killed in southern Lebanon.

Advertisement

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Israel’s military will stay in a “security zone” of southern Lebanon as long as “Israel’s security needs require it.”

Israel and Hezbollah are not parties to the agreement. Iran insists Israel must withdraw from the large swath of southern Lebanon it is occupying, but the wording of the interim deal doesn’t explicitly require that and only ensures Lebanon’s “territorial integrity.”

Hours before postponing his trip, Vance gave some indication of the state of flux when he told reporters at a White House briefing that he was uncertain if the talks were going to happen this weekend.

“Our plan is to go to Switzerland, I don’t know exactly when,” Vance told reporters. “We think these technical negotiations start sometime this weekend. That’s still the plan. But that could change.”

Soon after Vance spoke to reporters, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei endorsed direct negotiations with the U.S. in a terse statement read by state media that appeared to signal to the Islamic Republic’s leadership that it could move forward with a first round of talks.

“It is obvious that the face-to-face negotiations that will be held in the future will not mean accepting the enemy’s opinion,” Khamenei said in his statement.

Advertisement

The messaging seemed to give Khamenei, who was badly wounded in the Feb. 28 U.S. strike that killed his father, some maneuverability. Hard-liners in the Iranian government, including Khamenei’s father, have long opposed direct talks with the White House, especially after Trump, during his first term, pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by Democratic President Barack Obama’s administration.

More importantly for the White House, it appeared to create a permission structure for the talks to start.

The meeting was initially supposed to be a signing ceremony

Vance was initially expected to go to Switzerland to sign the agreement at a formal ceremony. Instead, Trump signed the document Wednesday during a glitzy dinner at the Palace of Versailles with French President Emmanuel Macron. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian separately signed the agreement.

The agreement states that Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which is believed to be buried under rubble left by U.S. military strikes last year targeting Tehran’s key nuclear sites, must at minimum be diluted under international supervision.

Advertisement

It also states that Iran shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons — a commitment it has made previously. But a range of other commitments remain to be worked out.

Iran believes it’s in a strong negotiating position

Iranians would be going into the talks with a measure of confidence after effectively shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, causing global economic reverberations, said Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East Program at Defense Priorities in Washington.

She said the U.S. is now “essentially trying to negotiate our way back to the prewar status quo.”

Neil Quilliam, an associate fellow with the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House think tank, said the “buoyant” Iranian leadership feels it has the upper hand. The endorsement of the talks by the Iranian supreme leader “sends a very strong signal domestically: ’We’re now on an equal footing with the U.S.’”

Advertisement

”‘Trump has gone from calling for regime change on Feb. 28 to this: Now they’re going to sit down with us directly and talk about these big issues,’” Quilliam said of the Iranians’ thinking. “So it’s intended more for the domestic audience, and telling them: ‘We are firmly in control of this. There can be no protests, no revolution: We are a new regime and we’re staying put.’”

Trump’s tone has also taken a notable shift.

For weeks, he’s insisted the financial costs to Americans were less important to him than stamping out Iran’s nuclear program. He irked some of his fellow Republicans when he indicated its potential impact on November’s midterm elections wasn’t a concern.

But this week, at the G7 summit in Evian-Les-Bains, France, he acknowledged that continuing the war could have led to “economic catastrophe” and that oil reserves were on track to run out in about four weeks.

Advertisement

“And the one president I did not want to be was the late, great Herbert Hoover,” said Trump, referring to the 31st president whose time in office was defined by the Great Depression.

Vance has to negotiate through political division

For Vance, a likely 2028 presidential contender, how the negotiations play out could have enormous ramifications for his political fortunes.

Vance’s skepticism of foreign wars was a core part of his political identity during his political rise. But now he finds himself the chief defender of negotiating an endgame to Trump’s conflict that Democrats have largely derided as a foolish gambit. Some hawkish Republicans are aghast that Trump is getting behind a settlement that could put billions of dollars into Iran’s coffers.

Sen. Roger Wicker, the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Thursday that aspects of the deal are “completely out of step” with Trump’s goals.

Advertisement

Trump had fiercely criticized Obama for the 2015 nuclear agreement, which Trump argued failed to stop Tehran from advancing toward a weapon and funneled billions of dollars to the Islamic Republic. The Republican exited the U.S. from the deal in 2018.

Trump has pushed back against comparisons to the JCPOA, saying he had “negotiated from strength” after a massive military campaign while asserting that Obama was paying the Iranians off and not receiving acquiescence.

Wicker was particularly concerned about the $300 billion fund for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran mentioned in the 14-point agreement, saying it “would make Iran’s payoff under Obama’s 2015 deal look like a pittance by comparison.” Trump and Vance have said no U.S. taxpayer money would go to such a fund and it would not come without concessions and reforms by Tehran.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Keir Starmer Allies Question His Chances For No 10

Published

on

Keir Starmer Allies Question His Chances For No 10

Even Keir Starmer’s enemies concede that he is a decent man.

So when he says that he won’t voluntarily walk away from 10 Downing Street and will stand in any Labour leadership contest if one is triggered, we should believe him.

His closest supporters insist that, as things stand, he does intend to fight to hang on to a job he’s had for less than two years.

But they also admit privately that the chances of him being able to do so are essentially zero.

Advertisement

The sheer scale of Andy Burnham’s victory in the Makerfield by-election means it is now inevitable that he will succeed Starmer in No.10, one way or another.

He nearly doubled Labour’s majority, and won more than 50% of the vote, in a seat where every council ward was won by Reform UK barely a month ago.

Even Labour MPs who are sceptical about Burnham’s abilities – and there remain many of them – admit that he is the best chance they have of saving their seats at the next general election.

In a call with Labour staff on Friday, Starmer said the party needed to “pull together” and “take the fight” to Reform in the Greater Manchester mayoralty by-election which will take place on July 30 as a result of Burnham’s return to Westminster.

Advertisement

“The one thing we’ve got to avoid doing is plunging our party and our country into chaos by turning on each other and tearing apart our party and our movement,” he said.

“That has never worked. That’s what the last government did. We need to learn that lesson.”

The prime minister’s biggest problem, however, is that while his MPs do indeed want to “pull together”, the vast majority of them now want to do so behind Andy Burnham.

Louise Haigh, one of Burnham’s key lieutenants, said the PM and his would-be successor need to now get their heads together “and agree a managed way forward”.

Advertisement

“Just six weeks ago, the Labour Party was facing existential crisis after the local elections, and it’s quite clear that the prime minister can’t take us into another set of elections,” she told the BBC.

“So I hope he reflects on the result last night in the interests of the country and of the party.

“We want this to be as managed and controlled as possible … we want to avoid a leadership contest if possible, and we hope that we can agree a way forward.”

Despite insisting earlier this week that he has enough support to stand in a leadership contest, HuffPost UK has been told that Wes Streeting is preparing to instead throw his weight behind Burnham.

Advertisement

The pair are said to have agreed a deal which would see the former health secretary given a top job in a Burnham cabinet.

Neither side are commenting publicly, but it is thought an announcement could come early next week.

Meanwhile, home secretary Shabana Mahmood and energy secretary Ed Miliband – who urged Starmer to go after Labour’s trouncing in the May 7 elections – are understood to have repeated that message to him on Friday.

A senior Labour figure said he believed an agreement for a transition of power from Starmer to Burnham will happen.

Advertisement

“I think they’ll get a deal,” he said. “It’s in both their interests and the country’s.

“There’ll be some fucking around next week but Keir will be gone by mid September latest.”

Labour party’s Andy Burnham stands beside candidate Count Binface, left, and a candidate for Protect British Wildlife after winning the Makerfield by-election, paving the way for a leadership challenge against Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. in Wigan, England, Friday, June 19, 2026.

One Starmer ally told HuffPost UK that the PM will eventually have to bow to the inevitable.

He said: “It comes down to what support there is in the Parliamentary Labour Party. I can’t imagine he’ll want to fight if he can only command a limited number of MPs.

Advertisement

“I would imagine there will be plenty of MPs not keen on Andy who will now be thinking ‘is there any point in resisting’, in much the same way as the Tories rowed in behind Boris Johnson before he became leader.

“I wouldn’t read too much into what Keir said this morning. Over the weekend he will be speaking to plenty of people and trying to work out where the support is, and if it just isn’t there, I don’t think he’ll stand in a contest he is bound to lose.”

Another supporter of the PM said: “I really want Keir to fight, but I think Andy becoming prime minister is inevitable.

“I’ve a feeling that he will end up announcing a timetable for his departure.”

Advertisement

Some around Burnham want the PM to announce that he will go in September, in time for their man to take over ahead of the Labour Party conference later that month.

A senior Labour source said Starmer will “do what he always does – try every wrong position before he gets to the obvious one”.

Another party insider added: “Imagine a sitting prime minister being forced out by his own members. Is that the plan? They need to wake up and have a good smell of the coffee beans.”

But one anti-Burnham MP accused him of “arrogance” for believing he can return to Westminster after nearly a decade away and become prime minister without even a leadership contest.

Advertisement

“If I was advising Andy, I’d be telling him to take his time and at least get to know the Labour MPs first,” he said.

“That would also allow him to flesh out his policy platform, because my worry is that he becomes PM and then he starts U-turning and making bad decisions because he has not been tested in advance.”

Andy Burnham is going to be Britain’s next prime minister. The only remaining question is when that might happen.

As Starmer sits down with his closest allies over the next 48 hours, the realisation will surely dawn that it is better for him to leave Downing Street on his own terms rather than being dragged out of the door kicking and screaming.

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

LIVE – Emergency response at Moses Gate Country Park

Published

on

LIVE - Emergency response at Moses Gate Country Park

As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our
articles.

Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local
services
.

These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local
community
.

It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need
as much support as possible during these challenging times.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Derek McInnes breaks silence on Hearts exit as Rangers boss admits title heartbreak anger

Published

on

Belfast Live

Derek McInnes has finally broken his silence on his exit from Hearts after being appointed as the new Rangers boss

Advertisement

Newly appointed Rangers manager Derek McInnes has conceded that “frustration is justifiable” amongst Hearts supporters, as he finally spoke out about the gut-wrenching title collapse.

The Jambos were tantalisingly close to clinching the Scottish Premiership title on the final day of the campaign, only for two late strikes to hand Martin O’Neill’s side the trophy at Celtic Park.

In the aftermath, Rangers chairman Andrew Cavenagh and chief executive Jim Gillespie wasted no time in luring McInnes away from Tynecastle, having previously allowed Danny Rohl to depart for RB Salzburg.

The development leaves Hearts in search of a new manager following a turbulent month that has seen the Edinburgh club relinquish their Premiership title challenge, while also losing skipper Lawrence Shankland and now McInnes himself to the Ibrox outfit.

Advertisement

McInnes acknowledged he was “angry and devastated” after Celtic crushed their historic title aspirations, and had kept quiet while “trying to process” the painful blow, reports the Daily Record.

In an open letter to supporters, published via the Hearts Standard, he wrote: “To all connected with Heart of Midlothian. It was an incredible privilege to manage the football club for the last 12 months.”

He continued: “When I was appointed, there was great delight and personal pride in being in such a position, a position that had appealed to me for a long time. It’s such a special football club and we had such a brilliant season together.

“I’m well aware I haven’t spoken since the last game of the season. I totally understand the frustration from fans around the lack of communication, both from myself and the club, considering the manner in which the season ended. The frustration is justifiable.

Advertisement

“I was so angry and devastated at how it all played out for us after putting so much effort in. The decisions that had a huge impact on the outcome were hard to take. Trying to process it all was part of my thinking as to why I didn’t speak.”

McInnes maintains he delivered on several of his objectives during his time as Hearts manager as he offered an emotional goodbye to the club – pointing to the side’s best-ever points haul and securing qualification for the Champions League.

He said: “When I arrived, I said I wanted to make Hearts something. A team that resonated with the supporters and a team that fans were excited to watch on a Saturday, no matter where and when. I believe we achieved that.

Advertisement

“I also wanted to make Tynecastle Park a place fans wanted to come to and a place opposition teams didn’t. I felt Tynecastle was even more special than it normally is and I had that feeling every time I walked out the tunnel and into the home dugout. An unbeaten home record was a brilliant achievement.

“Hearts came so close to completing one of the greatest seasons in the club’s history. Despite how the season ended, it was still hugely successful and memorable. A record points total, Champions League qualification, three derby wins and so many more highs and memories along the way.

“Unfortunately, the team didn’t get what they deserved in the end.

“I want to thank the players and staff. I’ve spoken to every single one of them over the last few days and wish them only well.

Advertisement

“A big thanks to the support I received from the board, particularly Calum Paterson, and also Graeme Jones for a brilliant, strong working relationship.

“I’d also like to thank Clare Cowan for her huge support of me, Alan Archibald, Paul Sheerin and all the players throughout the season. She is as good a member of staff as I’ve ever worked with.

“And, finally, the Heart of Midlothian support. I felt like one of you. The backing you gave me and the team was incredible and helped create something so special. I can’t speak highly enough about the Hearts fans. Thank you.

“I wish I’d got to Hearts sooner and that my time at the club was more than 12 months. It was only a short time, but it was a brilliant time. I wish Hearts only good things going forward.”

Advertisement

Sign up to our free sports newsletter to get the latest headlines to your inbox

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Ministers turn on Starmer as Labour MPs demand Burnham ‘coronation’ as PM

Published

on

Ministers turn on Starmer as Labour MPs demand Burnham ‘coronation’ as PM

Ministers are calling for urgent meetings with Sir Keir Starmer to urge him to quit to make way for Andy Burnham after his stunning victory at the Makerfield by-election.

Labour MPs are clamouring for a “coronation” for the former Greater Manchester mayor as prime minister to prevent a drawn-out leadership battle that could crush the party’s general election hopes.

Ministers have told The Independent they plan to tell tell Sir Keir he must set out a timetable to leave No 10, with cabinet members, including Yvette Cooper, Ed Miliband and Shabana Mahmood preparing to repeat their earlier demands that he do so, in the wake of Mr Burnham’s victory.

But a defiant Keir Starmer has refused to step down and made it clear he will fight any leadership contest, calling on the party “to pull together” and “avoid plunging the country into chaos”.

Advertisement

After beating Nigel Farage’s Reform with almost 55 per cent of the vote, Mr Burnham pledged to “lay out a new path for Britain”, prioritising the economy, reindustrialisation and education, at a victory rally where he was buoyed by a cheering crowd of supporters.

Burnham won Makerfield convincingly
Burnham won Makerfield convincingly (Getty)

He said his landslide victory was “the last chance to save Labour” after the party had slid to record low polling results following its victory in the 2024 general election under Sir Keir’s leadership.

Mr Burnham promised an end to “trickle-down” economics and an “unfair” immigration system and vowed to push for the reindustrialisation of Britain’s cities, use public procurement to boost British businesses and bring in work placements for all 16 to18-year-olds.

He said that people “did not give me a blank cheque”, adding: “We need an economy that works for everybody, not a few for people in far flung places. It is about time we backed British business and industry.”

But Sir Keir was clear that he is going nowhere without having his hand forced and still plans to fight a leadership election.

Advertisement

He said: “Let’s pull together as a party and a movement. The one thing we’ve got to avoid doing is plunging our party and our country into chaos by turning on each other and tearing apart our party and our movement. That has never worked. That’s what the last government did. We need to learn that lesson.”

Even though internal Labour polling in Makerfield suggested that the prospect of Mr Burnham replacing Sir Keir was the top reason people were voting for him, Sir Keir tried to take credit for Reform being “on the run”.

Starmer is being told to set a timetable for his departure
Starmer is being told to set a timetable for his departure (Reuters)

Meanwhile, ministers have confirmed they will tell Sir Keir that he needs to quit, while previous loyalists are also said to be considering interventions. Transport secretary Heidi Alexander had a conversation with Sir Keir on Friday afternoon. Meanwhile, deputy leader Lucy Powell and culture secretary Lisa Nandy are already seen as part of “team Burnham”.

Former cabinet minister Louise Haigh, a key lieutenant for Mr Burnham, has also called for him to go. “People in Makerfield have shown that they don’t want Reform they want a changed Labour, they want hope and optimism,” she added.

There are also expected to be representations made to former health secretary Wes Streeting to cut a deal with Mr Burnham, instead of pushing his own planned leadership bid.

Advertisement

The size of Mr Burnham’s victory margin, by 10,000 votes in Makerfield, has put to bed talk of the need for a Labour leadership contest in the minds of many Labour MPs and figures who are now calling for a “coronation” of the so-called “King of the North”.

Liverpool Riverside MP Kim Johnson said: “There definitely needs to be a coronation now. But more important is that we consider Labour Party democracy and reestablishing broad church in the party and ending factionalism.”

Karl Turner, who has been suspended from Labour for opposing plans to scrap the right to a jury trial but is expected to be brought back by Mr Burnham, said: “Keir Starmer just isn’t up to it. There needs to be a coronation.”

Labour MP Alex Sobel said: “Andy Burnham has proven his credentials in putting forward a Labour vision voters can rally around, the prime minister must think about what is best for the country and that is now clearly for an orderly transition of power to allow Labour members to elect a new leader.”

Advertisement
Burnham crushed Farage and Reform’s candidate Paul Kenyon
Burnham crushed Farage and Reform’s candidate Paul Kenyon (Reuters)

A Labour MP on the right of the party who had planned to be part of a different candidate’s leadership team, conceded: “I think a coronation is looking very likely now but I am not sure what it will look like.”

Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell was in tears on LBC listening to Mr Burnham’s victory speech. He said: “Keir [Starmer] has to recognise that it is time to move on. Let’s plan it properly, let’s not divide the party, let’s try and do it with a bit of dignity and what we describe in the party as comradeship.”

Another MP told The Independent: “It has been over for Keir for some time now we need to make a change with a minimum of fuss. Andy’s win and the margin makes it inevitable that he becomes leader now.”

Another said: “Wes [Streeting] should just cut a deal with Burnham so we don’t have to have a long drawn out contest and get on with governing.”

Tony Blair’s former director of communication Alastair Campbell added: “These are not normal times and this was not a normal by-election. Pressure on Keir Starmer grows because MPs see in Burnham the possibility of stopping Reform and reversing sense of pessimism. A 23 per cent swing since May locals, and the biggest by-election turnout differential since 1958! Not to be sniffed at. Boldness has been rewarded.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, trade union leaders, some of Labour biggest backers, have also pushed for a speedy change. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: “The win for Andy Burnham in Makerfield is a glimmer of hope but it must not be taken as a business as usual mandate.

“It is clear that there now needs to be an orderly timetable for a leadership election and Keir Starmer must do the right thing and step down.”

FBU general secretary Steve Wright added: “Andy now has a mandate to take on Farage and break with austerity by embracing policies to tax the super rich to properly fund public services and pay workers.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Apricot and lavender compote recipe

Published

on

Apricot and lavender compote recipe

Diana Henry is the Telegraph’s much-loved cookery writer. She shares recipes each week, for everything from speedy family dinners to special menus that friends will remember for months. She is also a regular broadcaster on BBC Radio 4, and her journalism and recipe books, including Simple and How to Eat a Peach, are multi-award-winning. A mother of two sons, Diana can satisfy even the fussiest of eaters.   

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Trump’s UFC fights viewership was 117 million short of Dana White’s Super Bowl-level prediction

Published

on

Trump’s UFC fights viewership was 117 million short of Dana White’s Super Bowl-level prediction

UFC’s fight card at the White House delivered a record-breaking viewership to Paramount+, according to the streaming platform, with 17 million viewers tuning in. However, this was 117m short of Dana White’s prediction of “Super Bowl-type numbers”.

On Sunday, an unprecedented event took place on the South Lawn, as seven UFC fights played out to celebrate 250 years of the United States, as well as the 80th birthday of President Donald Trump.

Trump sat cageside with UFC chief White, a good friend of his, as the night ended with Justin Gaethje securing an upset stoppage win over Ilia Topuria to become lightweight champion. In the co-main event, Ciryl Gane stopped Alex Pereira to win the interim heavyweight title, although the finish was controversial due to Gane’s allegedly illegal strikes.

(Reuters)

In fact, all seven bouts ended with stoppages, as American star Sean O’Malley joined compatriots Josh Hokit and Bo Nickal in picking up victories – although Hokit and Nickal’s wins came at the expense of other US fighters.

Regardless, the event was a success for Paramount+, which was the exclusive broadcaster of the fights in the US and Latin America. While the platform is yet to announce its viewership figures for other territories, 17m viewers watched in the US and Latin America, making it Paramount+’s most-watched exclusive live event ever. The number does not include any delayed viewership, or any viewership where more than one person watched on an account.

Advertisement

However, White had bullishly predicted Super Bowl-level viewing figures. And with this goal in mind, the White House fights drastically underperformed, coming in with 117m viewers less than the 124.9m US average for February’s Super Bowl LX, which aired on NBC.

In January, Paramount+ took over as the UFC’s main broadcast partner, as the mixed martial arts (MMA) promotion moved from a pay-per-view model to a subscriber-based one.

“Since the beginning of the year, 16m subscriber households have watched more than 180m hours of UFC programming on Paramount+,” read a press release on Thursday, “delivering viewership more than 20x the average pay-per-view event over the past two years.

Justin Gaethje recovered from a knockdown to stop Ilia Topuria between rounds four and five
Justin Gaethje recovered from a knockdown to stop Ilia Topuria between rounds four and five (Reuters)

“The inaugural numbered event, UFC 324 on 24 January, broke the record at the time for the largest exclusive live event on Paramount+ with 5m average viewers and 7m households in the US and Latin America, according to Adobe Analytics.” Nielsen was also used to verify figures.

“UFC Freedom 250 [at the White House] was the 6th marquee event in a seven-year deal between UFC and Paramount+ that includes 13 Numbered Events and 30 Fight Nights in the US and Latin America for 2026, with select offerings in Australia. UFC and Paramount+ also recently announced the expansion of UFC Numbered Event Main Card rights to Canada beginning in 2027.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

York and Tadcaster builders fought on stag night in Chester

Published

on

York and Tadcaster builders fought on stag night in Chester

Craig Fox, 43, Daniel Whitcombe, 38, and Kieran Watson, 23, were all involved in a brawl outside a pub in Chester city centre on Saturday May 9.

All three were sent back across the Pennines to their homes with court bills totalling hundreds of pounds each.

all pleaded guilty to using threatening or abusive bheaviour with intent to cause fear or provoke unlawful violence.

Advertisement

Fox of Marlborough Drive in Tadcaster, Whitcombe, of Pottery Lane, York and Watson, of St Stephens Square, Acomb, all pleaded guilty to using threatening or abusive behaviour with intent to cause fear or provoke unlawful violence..

Prosecutor Craig Welsby told the court CCTV footage showed Fox throwing punches at a member of the public before eventually grappling him to the ground.

There, Mr Welsby said, he landed more punches on the unknown victim’s head before they were able to stand and walk away.

Both Watson and Whitcombe threw one punch each to the face of the victim but with little impact.

Advertisement

The incident took place outside the Old Queens Head pub in Watergate Street.

Mr Welsby said their actions were aggravated because it was group activity.

Chris Hunt, defending all three men, said that neither he nor his clients had seen the CCTV footage because ‘Cheshire Police haven’t bothered to interview them’.

He said: “They’re from the York area who are builders and came to the city for a stag night.

Advertisement

“It appears that Watson, who was the youngest in the group, was attacked by the member of the public and Mr Fox jumped in to help.

“With no disrespect to Mr Fox, the victim got up without issue so he couldn’t have hurt him too much.

“They were fighting on the street and as they are aware, growing up in a Roman town where tourists are welcomed, it is frowned upon.”

When it was raised that one punch incidents are dangerous, Mr Hunt added they were lucky it was not more serious.

Advertisement

However, Mr Welsby told the court he felt Mr Hunt ‘had introduced new facts that could lead to a Newton hearing where the CCTV could be played’.

But Mr Hunt rebuffed this to state it was mitigation and the magistrates were also not convinced that it made ‘any material difference’.

After a small period of adjournment to consider their options, magistrates return to fine each defendant in turn.

Fox, as the lead offender, was fined £769 and ordered to pay a surcharge of £308 while Watson was fined Watson £350 with a surcharge of £140.

Advertisement

Whitcombe was fined £400 with a £160 surcharge and all three men will pay £85 in prosecution costs.  

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Man pronounced ‘dead at the scene’ of crash in Cambridge

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

The man, who was in his 30s, was pronounced dead at the scene

A man has died after a motorbike left a Cambridge road. Emergency services were called to a crash along the A603 Barton Road in Cambridge just before 8.30am on Thursday (June 18).

The crash involved one vehicle, a red Triumph motorbike, which left the road at around 8.25am. The rider of the bike, a man in his 30s from Papworth Everard, was pronounced dead at the scene.

Cambridgeshire Police is appealing for information into the crash. Anyone with information should call police on 101 or contact them online and quote Operation Lawford.

Advertisement

Do you want more of the latest Cambridgeshire news as it comes in from across the county? Sign up to our dedicated newsletter to make sure you never miss a big story from Cambridge or anywhere else in the county. You can also sign up to our dedicated Traffic and Crime newsletters for the latest updates on the topics you are most interested in .

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

People who studied at university between 2012 and 2022 may be in line for refunds

Published

on

Wales Online

Tens of thousands of UK graduates are set to receive student loan overpayment refunds after the Student Loans Company identified errors that mistakenly inflated loan balances for 41,000 people

Thousands of university graduates who studied over a 10-year period are expected to receive refunds after their student loan balances were incorrectly increased.

The Student Loans Company (SLC) is reaching out to impacted students following the identification of two distinct issues affecting particular plan two loans.

Plan two repayment schemes apply to undergraduate courses that began between 2012 and 2022.

Advertisement

The initial issue was a technical fault whereby inaccurate income data was used when calculating interest.

The second issue was an HMRC income reporting mistake, which affected individuals earning through both PAYE and self-assessment. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here

The mistakes have affected 71,000 former students in total consisting of 41,000 whose student loan balances were wrongly inflated and 30,000 whose balances were mistakenly diminished, reports the Manchester Evening News.

The SLC has stated it will contact customers whose balances have increased due to these issues.

Advertisement

Those who have paid too much will be eligible for a refund.

If your balance fell and you did not overpay you will not receive a refund. Instead, your account will be amended with the correct interest applied.

Those who have already settled their loan completely will not be obliged to commence repaying again.

The SLC also verified that both mistakes have now been corrected, stating any adjustments to balances will feature in an individual’s next annual statement, which should be available before the end of September.

Advertisement

It calculates that 1.3% of current plan two loans were affected.

An SLC spokesman said: “We are contacting some plan two customers to inform them we’re correcting their loan balance following technical issues which have now been resolved.

“Those customers affected do not need to take any action and regular repayment amounts will not change. SLC and HMRC are very sorry that this has happened.”

This comes after the announcement in April that interest rates on plan two and plan three student loans will be capped for the 2026-27 academic year.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

How to look cool at a festival in 2026 (hint: no sequins…)

Published

on

How to look cool at a festival in 2026 (hint: no sequins...)

I’ve never felt more agedly out of touch than the time I arrived at Primavera festival in Barcelona. I’d worn what I’d thought was a failsafe outfit: a sheer, rhinestone-encrusted top over a skintight cycling one-piece.

The crowd around me, meanwhile, looked decidedly more low-key. In tank tops, khaki shorts, wrap sunglasses, mid-calf boots and lots and lots of black, they looked effortlessly cool, like they had just stepped out of a Charli xcx music video. Somehow, I’d completely missed the memo.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025