Sharon Michael was around 30 when the decision crystallised in her mind, quietly. There was no dramatic moment, no single life event that changed everything. Instead, it emerged through years of work, reflection and a growing sense that motherhood was not a future she wanted.
For generations, having children in India was less a choice than an expected chapter of adult life. Marriage was followed by parenthood, often with little discussion of alternatives. Today, that certainty is fading among married couples and single professionals alike; conversations around children are becoming more deliberate, more cautious and, in some cases, more sceptical.
“Having kids was never a priority,” says Michael, 36. “I have PCOD and I didn’t want to go through the whole process because of how much effort it takes and all of that,” she says, referring to polycystic ovarian disease, a hormonal condition that affects how the ovaries work and can cause irregular periods.
Michael, who works in the corporate sector, says parenthood would require sacrifices she is unwilling to make. “I do not see that lifestyle fitting in with a child specifically,” she says. “I would not be doing justice to either.” After taking a career break to pursue an MBA, she says she remains uncertain about stepping away from work again. “I still don’t feel ready myself to take up responsibility of that scale.”
Advertisement
She is an example of a highly-educated woman weighing up the balance of her options, rather than following what for previous generations was an assumed path through life. Such personal choices are now reflected in national statistics.
Children attend a class at the government-run Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose residential school that houses tribal students from drought-ridden villages (AFP/Getty)
India’s total fertility rate – the average number of children a woman is expected to have during her lifetime – has for the first time fallen to 1.9, below the replacement level of 2.1 required to maintain a stable population, according to the latest Sample Registration System report.
The shift marks a remarkable demographic transformation for a country that spent decades worrying about rapid population growth. In the early 1990s, when women had an average of 3.4 children, family planning campaigns became part of public life and, at times, took controversial forms, including the forced sterilisation programme during the Emergency in 1970s.
Later campaigns encouraged couples to have no more than two children, and were popularised through slogans such as “Hum do, humare do”, loosely translating from Hindi as “We two, ours two”.
For decades, Indian governments worried about overpopulation.
Advertisement
Economists say that India should avoid viewing fertility decline as a crisis. Alicia García-Herrero, the chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, explains the decline should not be viewed as a demographic failure.
“India’s fertility decline is not a failure – it’s a sign of progress,” she tells The Independent. “As women gain education, economic options and decision-making power, they are choosing smaller families.”
“The immediate impact is still positive,” says Garcia-Herrero. “India continues to benefit from a large working-age population.”
Behind the statistics lie millions of unique and intimate stories, a generation rethinking what family, success and fulfilment should look like.
Advertisement
A Kashmiri woman shelters from the rain under an umbrella with a child while a man paddles a boat along Dal Lake in Srinagar (AFP/Getty)
The forces reshaping Indian families, she says, are the same ones that transformed societies across Europe and East Asia: rising female education, urbanisation, changing aspirations and the growing cost of raising children.
Sociological patterns visible across India’s geography support that argument. New Delhi records one of the country’s lowest fertility rates at 1.2 births per woman, while Kerala and Tamil Nadu stand at 1.3. Bihar, among India’s poorest states, records the highest rate at 2.9. In other words, birth rates closely mirror differences in education, healthcare, infant mortality and women’s economic participation.
For Akshita Gupta, a 35-year-old Mumbai resident and mother of a 21-month-old son and now pregnant with their second child, becoming a parent was always something she imagined for herself. “I’ve always felt maternal,” she says. “I have always felt I wanted a child.”
But before she and her husband started a family, they spent years discussing not just whether to have children, but how they would raise them. Financial security mattered alongside emotional stability and familial support.
“I feel our base was secure financially, emotionally,” she says. “And we both had our families. So I feel one is of course the inherent desire, but I also feel the fact that, you know, we had the support system.”
Advertisement
Even then, timing weighed heavily on her mind. Having watched friends undergo IVF treatment, Gupta was determined to try to conceive naturally. After consulting her gynaecologist, she set herself a goal of having children before the age of 35. “I wanted to have both my children before 35,” she says. “I had a few friends who were going through IVF and I saw their struggles.”
This photograph taken on 12 May 2026 shows women working inside a factory in Tamil Nadu’s Karur district (AFP/Getty)
Demographers describe India’s falling fertility rate as part of a broader demographic transition seen across much of the world. As child mortality falls, healthcare improves, women gain greater access to education and people marry later, family sizes typically shrink.
Government data suggests several long-term changes have converged at once. Infant mortality has fallen sharply, dropping from 30 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2019 to 24 in 2024. At the same time, women are marrying later than previous generations. Nationally, 73.5 per cent of women now marry after the age of 21, while the figure rises to 82.2 per cent in urban India. In 2018, 64.5 per cent of women married in their 20s across the country.
A newlywed couple looks on during the marriage of 20 Hindu couples in Ahmedabad on 11 February 2023 (AFP/Getty)
“Higher levels of education, particularly among women, have played a key role, along with urbanisation, later marriages and delayed childbirth,” says development economist Dipa Sinha. “Improved access to health care and a sharp fall in infant mortality have also contributed.”
“More recently, you also see that the opportunity cost of having children is high.”
García-Herrero agrees that education sits at the centre of the transformation.
Advertisement
“The biggest drivers are female education and economic pressures,” she says. “Educated women marry later, use contraception more effectively and prioritise investing in fewer children.”
She argues that the decline reflects a broader expansion of female agency rather than a rejection of family life.
“This is the same story seen across developed and rapidly developing societies,” she says. “Female education is one of the strongest forces lowering fertility because it changes aspirations and gives women real choices.”
A couple looks at the city view while visiting the Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves in Bhubaneswar on 3 May 2026 (AFP/Getty)
For some, the choice is about autonomy. Abhimanyu Sinha says he has never wanted children.
“That was a fairly unpopular opinion when I first used to say this when I was like 16-17,” he says. “I’ve noticed it’s sort of becoming essentially the norm now among people I speak to.”
Advertisement
The 28-year-old dismisses affordability as the primary explanation. “I think a lot of people hide behind claims like affordability, the rising cost of private school or housing,” he says. “In my social position, those aren’t as much of a concern. I just don’t want to tie myself down to that kind of thing.”
Looking ahead, he expects a longer and healthier life than previous generations experienced. “I don’t think that I wanna spend like… 70-80 years focused on one or two relationships, of children.”
People light diyas, or traditional earthen oil lamps, as a drone laser show is organised at the India Gate memorial as part of the Diwali celebrations, the Hindu festival of lights, at Kartavya Path in New Delhi on 18 October 2025 (AFP/Getty)
His view reflects a broader cultural shift that researchers are observing globally. Parenthood is increasingly being weighed against other aspirations including travel, education, careers, relationships and personal freedom rather than treated as an inevitable destination.
García-Herrero says cultural changes are reinforcing the demographic transition. “This is not just economics,” she says. “It reflects women gaining agency and societies becoming more modern.”
The contrast with previous generations is striking. “When I think of myself having a kid,” Michael says, “I want that kid to have the best life possible.”
Advertisement
Her parents saw children as part of a social script, she says. “Their idea was that, OK, this is a rite of passage.” Today’s prospective parents often approach the decision differently. They want more involvement, more emotional awareness and more resources dedicated to each child.
Gupta sees that change in her own parenting. “Parents now are a lot more conscious,” she says. “About parenting styles, about what they are talking in front of their kids, what they’re exposing their children to.”
The result is that many families are choosing quality over quantity.
“Children have become more expensive,” says Sinha, the economist. Not only because costs have risen, she argues, but because parents increasingly want to invest more heavily in each child’s wellbeing and future.
Advertisement
India entered its demographic-dividend phase in 2005, when the share of working-age adults exceeded the combined number of children and elderly people. According to UN estimates, that demographic window is expected to last until around 2055.
The country’s median age remains just 29.8 years, younger than the global average of 31 and far below countries such as Britain, where the median age is more than 40. Economists argue that this gives India a rare opportunity to generate growth, create jobs and increase productivity before ageing becomes a more serious challenge.
“The real challenge will come in 15 to 20 years with a shrinking workforce and rising elderly dependency,” García-Herrero says.
“If there are fewer children born, then in about 30 to 40 years, India will have more older people who cannot participate in the labour force as much,” Sinha adds.
Advertisement
That raises questions about pensions, healthcare, elderly care and the future workforce.
It may also reshape politics. Southern states, which already have lower fertility rates and slower population growth, have expressed concerns that future redistribution of parliamentary seats based on population could reduce their political influence relative to faster-growing northern states.
Economists say the priority now should be making the most of India’s demographic dividend while it lasts.
Around the world, governments from South Korea to Singapore and China have spent billions trying to encourage people to have more children through subsidies, cash incentives, housing support and fertility programmes. But the outcomes have been mixed.
Advertisement
“No Asian country has successfully reversed a low fertility rate despite massive spending,” García-Herrero says. “South Korea poured hundreds of billions into incentives with almost no lasting effect.”
The reason, she argues, is that policymakers often misunderstand why people are having fewer children. “These programmes have largely failed because they treated low fertility as a financial problem rather than a structural and cultural one.”
In countries such as Japan and South Korea, marriage remains closely linked to traditional gender roles. Women continue to carry most childcare and domestic responsibilities, even when both partners work.
“Many young women and increasingly men, no longer see marriage as an attractive proposition,” García-Herrero says. “Women often face intense pressure to either give up or severely compromise their careers once they marry and have children.”
Advertisement
Sinha similarly argues that meaningful support requires more than one-off payments. “Free childcare. Free schooling. They have free healthcare,” she says of some European systems. “All these services, I think should anyway be there.”
People skate in front of India Gate on a cold foggy winter morning in New Delhi on 3 January 2024 (AFP/Getty)
The challenge, Sinha suggests, is not persuading people to have children through incentives but creating conditions that make parenthood compatible with modern life.
Sinha says, that means affordable childcare, better parental leave, flexible work arrangements and reducing the costs of housing and education.
For Gupta, it means rethinking expectations around work and caregiving. Even in households committed to equal parenting, she says, mothers still shoulder a disproportionate burden. “When you give birth, you are the one who’s basically going through pregnancy,” she says. “You are the one delivering the child. You are the one who has to breastfeed the child.”
After becoming a mother, she stepped away from her family’s business and began considering a new career path. “There’s definitely a sacrifice,” she says.
The commemorations begin today, June 22, with a flag-raising ceremony outside Bolton Town Hall at 10.55am, followed by a free luncheon for veterans and serving personnel in Festival Hall.
The main Armed Forces Day event will take place in Victoria Square on Saturday, June 27, from 10am until 3.30pm.
A formal service is due to begin at 10.40am, with visitors also able to enjoy military displays, cadet activities, music and family-friendly entertainment throughout the day.
Advertisement
Military vehicles and equipment will be on display, while charities, emergency services and community organisations will also be attending.
Children will be able to take part in free activities and challenges, with stalls and demonstrations planned across the town centre.
The day will begin with a Sea Cadet flag ceremony and conclude with a sunset flag-lowering ceremony at around 3.30pm.
Armed Forces Day is held nationally to recognise the contribution of serving personnel, reservists, veterans, cadets and military families.
Advertisement
Events take place across the UK each year on the final Saturday in June.
Bolton’s event is expected to feature cadet displays, military equipment, community stalls and activities designed to bring residents together in support of the Armed Forces community.
It fell into administration in February, for the second time in 12 months, after a “tough start” to 2026.
Alistair McAlinden and Geoff Jacobs from Interpath were appointed joint administrators, and Interpath announced last month that Quiz would implement a “closure plan” for its final stores over the coming weeks.
More than 100 head office and warehouse jobs were also put at risk when the company entered administration.
Advertisement
UK fashion brand Quiz to shut final 20 UK stores this weekend
Now, it has been confirmed that all of the remaining Quiz sites, of which there are 20, will shut down by the end of tomorrow (June 20), according to Drapers.
The Scottish retail brand operated 40 standalone stores across the UK before falling into administration.
Three stores were shut before May 21, which was when it confirmed that a “phased closure plan” would see the remaining sites also close down.
Several Quiz store closures took place on June 10, including locations in Aberdeen, Inverness, Warrington, Basingstoke, Bracknell, and Dunfermline.
In the last week, Quiz stores in Warrington, Basingstoke, Hanley, Mansfield, Eastbourne, Telford, Carlisle, Watford, Clydebank, and Irvine have also permanently closed.
Advertisement
Interpath confirmed today that the remaining 20 stores will close by the end of trade on Saturday (June 20), at the latest.
Alistair McAlinden, head of Interpath in Scotland and joint administrator, said: “As the Quiz stores close their doors for the final time, we would like to thank every member of staff for their commitment over the past five months.
“In exceptionally challenging circumstances, their professionalism ensured the business could continue to trade effectively.
“We are extremely grateful for their efforts and wish them all the best for the future.”
Advertisement
The number of workers impacted by all these closures also remains unknown.
Heavy discounts of up to 80% will be on offer at these remaining Quiz stores as administrators seek to sell off as much as possible to help pay the collapsed firm’s outstanding debts.
Full list of the remaining 20 Quiz stores closing by tomorrow
The full list of the final 20 Quiz outlets that will be shutting by the end of tomorrow is:
St. Enoch
Derby
Leicester
Northampton
Portsmouth
Castleford
Newtownabbey
Livingston
Buchanan
Stirling
Trafford
Fort
Merryhill
Braehead
Meadowhall
Metro
Cardiff
Arndale
Craigavon
Hull
Other UK companies that have closed or entered administration/liquidation in 2026
Quiz follows several retailers that have entered administration this year, as well as others who have announced widespread store closures.
Advertisement
Major high street brands LK Bennett and Claire’s both closed all their stores in April, having previously fallen into administration.
UK fashion retailer Leading Labels is also set to close its remaining 15 stores after falling into liquidation.
Other retailers have been forced to close stores this year, including:
It’s also been reported that Morrisons is looking to sell some of its in-store pharmacies as it continues to cut costs.
It’s not been all bad news for the UK high street, with several major brands announcing new store openings for 2026, including Aldi, M&S, and Superdrug.
Did you ever shop in Quiz? Let us know in the comments below.
Labour’s rules mean even getting onto the ballot can be a complex process.
First, candidates must secure the backing of 81 Labour MPs, 20% of the party’s parliamentary strength.
Sir Keir Starmer (Image: PA MEDIA)
They then need to receive nominations from either 5% of constituency Labour parties, or three affiliated organisations (which must include two trade unions) which represent 5% of affiliated membership.
Advertisement
Only after passing those two stages will candidates go before the party membership.
Who could stand in a contest?
Andy Burnham’s decision to stand in the Makerfield by-election – giving up the Greater Manchester mayoralty to become an MP – suggests he believes he has the necessary backing from the parliamentary party to get onto the ballot.
Former health secretary Wes Streeting has repeatedly insisted he has the 81 names required to mount a leadership bid, and has spent the weeks since his resignation setting out his stall.
Former Royal Marines officer Al Carns, who quit as armed forces minister in a row over defence funding and the treatment of Northern Ireland veterans, has also hinted he would seek to enter a leadership race, although it is unclear whether the MP – who was only elected in 2024 – has the supporters required to get on the ballot paper.
Advertisement
How would a Labour leadership contest work?
After a leadership hopeful nails down 81 backers in the Commons and support from constituency parties and trade unions, candidates are then put to a vote among party members, who rank them in order of preference.
A contender is declared the winner if they get more than 50% of first preferences, and this usually happens through a process of elimination during rounds of voting, the timetable for which is set by Labour’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC).
How long will this take?
Labour’s NEC will set the timetable for the whole election, including how long potential candidates have to secure nominations and how long members will be able to vote.
The party’s last leadership contest, in 2020, ran for around three months, with nominations opening in early January and the result announced in early April.
Advertisement
NEC sources have previously suggested there is little appetite for a long contest, with a maximum of two months being floated.
But Mr Burnham’s supporters have suggested a “transition” period that would see the new leader take over in September, which would mean a longer contest.
What would a coronation look like?
Andy Burnham’s significant support among the parliamentary party could mean he ends up as the only candidate.
With no need for a membership ballot, that scenario could see the contest wrapped up within a matter of weeks or even days.
Advertisement
But given Mr Burnham’s apparent preference for a three-month “transition” period to allow him to prepare for government, it is unclear what would happen next in the event he was the only candidate.
Insisting on a transition would leave Sir Keir as a lame duck over a period that includes a Nato summit where countries are expected to set out plans to increase defence spending, and a UK-EU summit in Brussels seen as crucial to Labour’s attempts to reset relations with the bloc.
There is some precedent for such a coronation, however. Gordon Brown was the only candidate to receive enough nominations in Labour’s 2007 leadership election more than a month before Tony Blair formally stepped down as prime minister.
In that period, Mr Brown still attended leadership hustings around the country to set out his ideas and attempt to win over the public.
A Utah judge is set to decide Monday whether prosecutors crossed a line with public comments about evidence in the murder case against Tyler Robinson, who is accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Defense attorneys for Robinson are asking Judge Tony Graf to prevent prosecutors from pursuing the death penalty, arguing that statements made to the media about a bullet fragment recovered from Kirk’s body could unfairly influence potential jurors.
The dispute centers on comments from the Utah County Attorney’s Office after the defense revealed that early testing was inconclusive on whether the bullet fragment matched the firearm investigators say was used in the shooting.
The Utah judge in the murder case over Charlie Kirk’s killing says he will rule Monday whether prosecutors could face sanctions for comments to the media about a bullet fragment recovered from the conservative activist’s body (AFP/Getty)
Robinson’s attorneys accused prosecutors, including Deputy Utah County Attorney Christopher Ballard, of attempting to shape public opinion by discussing the ballistics evidence outside the courtroom. They argued the comments could damage Robinson’s chances of receiving a fair trial.
Prosecutors pushed back, saying they responded only after speculation surrounding the case spread publicly. Ballard told the court he did not disclose specific details about the evidence and spoke only in general terms about the challenges of ballistics testing.
Advertisement
The high-profile case has drawn intense attention and fueled unverified theories online, including speculation about possible additional suspects. Authorities and attorneys have expressed concern that misinformation could complicate efforts to select an impartial jury.
Tyler Robinson, who is accused of fatally shooting Charlie Kirk, appears during a hearing in Fourth District Court in Provo, Utah, on Dec. 11 (Rick Egan/Pool The Salt Lake Tri)
Legal experts say the defense request is unlikely to succeed. Paul Cassell, a University of Utah law professor and former federal judge, said courts typically handle concerns about media coverage by carefully screening potential jurors rather than blocking prosecutors from seeking the maximum punishment.
“It would be extraordinary” for the judge to remove the death penalty option over the comments, Cassell said.
Robinson, 23, of southwestern Utah, has not entered a plea. Prosecutors have said they will seek the death penalty if he is convicted of aggravated murder in the Sept. 10 killing of Kirk, a close ally of President Donald Trump who was shot while speaking at Utah Valley University.
Kirk (R) and and his wife Erika Lane Frantzve (L) on stage during the Turning Point USA Inaugural-Eve Ball at the Salamander Hotel on January 19, 2025 (Getty)
Judge Graf held a hearing last week on whether prosecutors should face sanctions over their remarks. Robinson’s attorneys also pointed to a separate Utah case involving prosecutorial conduct and argued that limiting the death penalty could be an available remedy in extreme circumstances.
A key hearing is scheduled for July 6-10, when prosecutors must present evidence showing the case should proceed to trial.
The Government’s plan for 1.5 million homes is doomed.
Governments don’t build houses. Builders do. But no one builds at a loss or for a miserable profit that doesn’t reward risk or effort.
In 1988 there were more than 12,000 small/medium registered builders.
Advertisement
By 2017 less than 3,000 survived because of increased costs, unrealistic demands and over regulation.
Traditional family firms in York were squeezed out when York Council hiked “affordable” targets from 25 per cent to 50 per cent while reducing the threshold from 25 to 15 dwellings; a ludicrous two dwellings in villages.
As predicted by myself and Paul Cordock planning applications dried up and outturn plummeted – despite City of York Council claiming hostel bed spaces and Lawful Use certificates as new homes.
York’s council blamed anyone but its own policies. Particularly the banks; but many builders had cash reserves and didn’t need to borrow.
Advertisement
Read next:
Those that did couldn’t receive funding because financiers would not take risks where “affordable” demands stripped out profits leaving no headroom for contingencies.
There is a reason why many more homes were built in the 60s and 70s and why people could afford to buy them. There wasn’t the excessive regulations and financial burdens that have since been heaped upon house builders.
Today, even big companies are struggling. They pick and choose sites to proceed and are scaling back operations. Apprenticeships are reduced and the skilled workforce declines. Many entrepreneurs have left the industry. Newcomers are rare because the incentive has largely been destroyed.
Advertisement
Those of us with a lifetime’s construction experience know Labour’s housing targets are unachievable.
Matthew Laverack,
Retired architect and housebuilder,
Lord Mayors Walk,
Advertisement
York
What do you think?
Feel strongly about an issue? Write us a letter. Please write no more than 250 words and you must provide your full name, address and mobile number. Send your views by email to: letters@thepress.co.uk
Write a comment
Advertisement
Join the debate and leave a comment in our comments section below this article – we may use your comments for a follow up article.
The Daily Record first backed calls for Keir Starmer to resign in February. In an editorial column published after Labour was thrashed in the Gorton by-election, losing heavily to the Greens, we said the PM should do the honourable thing and walk away.
The Record View stated: “If Starmer cannot win a suburban seat in Greater Manchester where Labour previously enjoyed a thumping majority, he cannot win anywhere.
“The PM can complain all he likes about Reform and the Greens running populist campaigns which offer voters nothing but a bunch of easy answers.
Advertisement
“But many voters are looking for an alternative to Labour and the Tories – and both of these traditional left and right parties are in turmoil as a result.”
OBBUERGEN, Switzerland (AP) — Negotiators from the U.S. and Iran were set to engage in a second day of talks Monday to solidify a permanent end to the war between the countries, after a first day of mediation began with a rocky start.
Mediators Qatar and Pakistan hailed what they called “encouraging progress” made during the talks as Iran and the United States agreed to create a “de-confliction cell” to address the fighting in Lebanon. A senior U.S. diplomat claimed progress on multiple fronts, including the establishment of “mechanisms” to ensure the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for global energy shipments, remains open and that a ceasefire in southern Lebanon holds.
Yet the first full day of talks between the U.S. and Iran, who were accompanied by Qatari and Pakistani officials, was jolted by blistering statements from U.S. President Donald Trump, who from thousands of miles away from the Swiss negotiating venue at a mountainside resort near Lake Lucerne was firing off comments that offended the Iranians.
Iranian state media said talks had paused after the “publication of an insulting message by the U.S. President.” The Iranian delegation then met with Qatari mediators and left the negotiating site, state media said. The senior U.S. diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity to brief journalists on the ongoing talks, said late Sunday that the Iranians remained on site and the negotiations were on.
Advertisement
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had vowed to “never back down from the right to enrich uranium,” according to state media, and Trump later told Fox News in a phone interview that Pezeshkian should watch what he says and also threatened to take over Iran, according to one of the news channel’s correspondents.
Trump also continued to issue warnings against Iran on social media, posting as negotiators worked: “Iran must immediately stop their highly paid PROXIES in Lebanon from causing trouble. If they don’t, we’ll hit Iran very hard again, just like we did last week, only harder!!!”
Sign up for Morning Wire:
Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.
Advertisement
It’s unclear when Vance will depart Switzerland, although he told Fox News in an interview Saturday that he anticipates staying only a “day or two.” Kushner and Witkoff are handling much of the technical details on behalf of the U.S. delegation.
In a joint statement, Pakistan and Qatar said the high-level talks had ended and that technical negotiations would continue in Switzerland for the rest of the week. The statement said the sides had agreed to establish a “communication line” to ensure safe passage of ships in the Strait of Hormuz, as well as a mechanism to bring about an end to the fighting between Israel and the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon.
The U.S. offered no immediate comment, while Iran praised the meditators’ work.
Advertisement
Araghchi wrote on X that Pakistani and Qatari mediators delivered “major progress to end the Lebanon War.” He added that the first “real test” of negotiations would be whether the mechanism succeeded in halting the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah.
The senior U.S. diplomat said among the issues discussed was Iran’s messaging as it related to the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran’s military said it closed Saturday in response to continued fighting in Lebanon. U.S. Central Command has disputed that Iran closed the strait again.
The interim deal to end the fighting in Iran, signed last week by the leaders of the U.S. and Iran, outlines a 60-day period for negotiators to settle the future of Tehran’s nuclear program amid concerns that it wants to use it for military purposes, a claim Iran denies. The fate of frozen Iranian assets, among other thorny issues, are also on the agenda.
Though the talks will encompass a vast array of complex matters, Iran first wants to focus on addressing the fighting in Lebanon.
Advertisement
Saturday’s renewed ceasefire in Lebanon appeared to be holding, and Israel’s military said it would lift movement restrictions for residents near the Israel-Lebanon border on Monday morning. Neither Israel nor Hezbollah is a signatory to the U.S.-Iran deal.
There was cautious calm Monday in Lebanon, with no Israeli strikes reported overnight after a day of quiet Sunday. Hezbollah likewise has not announced any attacks on Israeli forces since Saturday.
The lull in fighting in Lebanon is the longest since the outbreak of the latest Israel-Hezbollah war on March 2.
___
Advertisement
Kim reported from Washington. Associated Press reporters Abby Sewell in Beirut, David Rising in Bangkok and Jon Gambrell in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, contributed to this story.
The series stars Nicole Kidman and Jamie Lee Curtis fans are comparing the forensic crime drama to a long-running hit.
Enthusiasts of detective dramas are encouraging others to discover a crime series adapted from a book collection of the same title.
Advertisement
The eight-part series, which has secured a second season and features an impressive ensemble cast, centres on a forensic pathologist who employs her expertise to crack criminal cases.
Scarpetta is the series attracting attention, with Kidman portraying Kay Scarpetta, a gifted forensic pathologist who utilises cutting-edge forensic techniques to solve mysteries.
The programme draws from Patricia Cornwell’s novels, with the protagonist modelled on former Virginia Chief Medical Examiner, Marcella Farinelli Fierro.
Advertisement
Viewers have flocked to IMDb to express their views, with one describing it as an “excellent” interpretation of the books.
They continued: “Being a long-time fan of the UK’s Silent Witness, I see this as a US series in a similar vein. I read a couple of Patricia Cornwell novels some years ago.
“I recall thinking they were tough going and stopped reading any more. So imagine my surprise at being blown away by such a great show.
Advertisement
“The acting, the plotting, the switching between the past and present iterations of the main characters, all were extremely well done and entertaining.
“Everyone involved is at the top of their game in my opinion.”
Another viewer enthused: “This series absolutely captures the novels which are so much more than murders. The characters are very complex and rich.
Advertisement
“Show writers got it. Even the soundtrack of the show honours the books. It’s GREAT! Casting is fantastic. Like perfect- all the naysayers are just irritated it didn’t fit the mould they created visually in their mind.
“Watch it. You like mysteries and well-developed characters? Then you’ll enjoy the ride.”
Get 30 days of Prime Video totally free
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
TV lovers can get 30 days’ free access to tantalising TV like The Boys, Reacher and Clarkson’s Farm by signing up to Amazon Prime. Just remember to cancel at the end and you won’t be charged.
A further fan added: “Omg such a fun, twisty mystery! Love the performances – could watch Nicole Kidman and Jamie Lee Curtis fight all day!”
Production on the second series got under way in March 2026, with Jamie Lee Curtis taking to Instagram to announce: “We are in the middle of it, we are having such a good time. Thanks so much for your loving support.”
Delivered by North Lanarkshire Council’s Community Partnership Team, the project was shaped through engagement with local residents to ensure the space reflects what families wanted to see in the area.
Children and families in the Jerviston area of Motherwell have been enjoying the opening of a brand-new play area designed with the local community at its heart.
Advertisement
The new facility was officially opened on 16 June by Councillor Geraldine Woods alongside Our Lady & St Francis Primary School pupil, Wiktoria, whose winning entry in the local “Design-a-Sign” competition now welcomes visitors at the entrance to the park.
Delivered by North Lanarkshire Council’s Community Partnership Team, the project was shaped through engagement with local residents to ensure the space reflects what families wanted to see in the area.
The new play area offers something for all ages, with a multi-play unit, accessible roundabout and trampoline, climbing equipment, cableway and a range of swings including a basket swing. Picnic benches have also been added to create a welcoming space for parents, carers and families to spend time together.
Located beside the existing MUGA facility, it provides even more opportunities for children and young people to play, be active and enjoy time outdoors.
Advertisement
Councillor Geraldine Woods, NLC’s Convener of Communities, said: “It’s fantastic to see this new play area open and already being enjoyed by local children and families. What makes it even more special is that local young people helped shape it from the beginning.
“Spaces like this do much more than provide somewhere to play. They help bring communities together, encourage healthier lifestyles and create places where children can make memories, build confidence and simply enjoy being outdoors. We’re proud to support projects that make a real difference locally.”
Funded through £100,000 from the Local Development Programme and the Scottish Government, the investment forms part of ongoing work to improve local spaces and create places where communities can thrive.
Don’t miss the latest news from the West Lothian Courier. Sign up to our free newsletter
The number of people in the UK using GLP-1s is projected to rise from approximately three million to seven million by 2027.
Advertisement
Earlier this month, the UK’s medicines regulator approved the Wegovy tablet, manufactured by Novo Nordisk.
Chemist4U reported that over 10,000 people have already joined a waiting list for a consultation ahead of the pill’s anticipated launch, with many expressing interest having never previously used GLP-1 injections.
These medications function by mimicking a natural hormone released after eating, thereby reducing food cravings and promoting a feeling of fullness.
Supermarkets, food chains and brands have already been introducing new products to cater to the growing number of people with reduced appetites, with Sainsbury’s, Marks & Spencer, Waitrose and Greggs among those introducing nutrient-rich meals
PwC found that the oral pill could accelerate a shift in habits that was already under way, with spending being reallocated across categories including food, nutrition, fitness and wellness.
Some 70 per cent of GLP-1 users are spending less in appetite-led categories such as snacks, confectionary and crisps, while 60 per cent are spending more on fresh food, the study showed.
Advertisement
A total of 40 per cent are spending more on products that support nutrition, fitness and confidence such as vitamins and supplements, the study showed.
More than 80 per cent of those who had stopped treatment said they had maintained at least some of the dietary and grocery changes they adopted while taking medication.
Supermarkets, food chains and brands have already been introducing new products to cater to the growing number of people with reduced appetites, with Sainsbury’s, Marks & Spencer, Waitrose and Greggs among those introducing nutrient-rich meals.
GLP-1 users represent a mix of genders, ages and incomes, PwC’s study found, which it said suggested that the medication was becoming mainstream.
Advertisement
GLP-1s are already influencing spending habits across the UK but the approval of the first oral pill this month will drive a more powerful shift, PwC Strategy& found in a study
Women account for 60 per cent of current users, and 80 per cent are aged between 25 and 54.
About 70 per cent of users are accessing the medication privately, rather than being prescribed it through the NHS, according to the research.
The accountancy giant’s strategy consulting unit surveyed 2,300 UK adults for the report.
Jacqueline Windsor, head of retail at PwC UK, said: “GLP-1 is the most consumerised medication today.
“Users express renewed confidence and energy that are shaping their demand for nutritious food, fitness routine and wardrobe refresh – which represent a basket reallocation rather than reduction of spend.”
Advertisement
She added that consumer businesses were likely to “reshape their portfolios” and “innovate to capture changing preferences”.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login