Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

NewsBeat

Why the King’s patience finally snapped after Harry’s endless flip-flopping on Palace stay: REBECCA ENGLISH reveals how Charles was pushed to breaking point by ‘chaos, disruption and disrespect’

Published

on

(L to R) Andy Mundy-Castle, Afua Hirsch, Misan Harriman and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex attend the UK Premiere of 'Shoot The People' at Picturehouse Central in London on Monday

It was, in the words of one insider, ‘the day the King’s patience snapped’.

After weeks of dithering and flip-flopping, not to mention the repeated leaks and briefings by Team Sussex, His Majesty was pushed to breaking point. Enough was enough.

What prompted him to slap down his younger son wasn’t the embarrassment it was causing him personally to see their family difficulties being played out in such a public arena.

It was, as one source described to me yesterday, the ‘disruption and disrespect’ to his staff.

Advertisement

Buckingham Palace, you see, isn’t quite ready for visitors at the moment, let alone ones as high-profile as the boss’s son.

It’s still largely a building site (and will be until next year) and unsuitable for guests.

Nevertheless the royal household was still willing to prepare rooms for Prince Harry when he was due to arrive in the UK last night and to change existing staffing arrangements to have a team on standby to cater to his every whim.

But the constant to-ing and fro-ing had left the King’s patience worn extremely thin.

Advertisement

Having stood the staff team down again on Saturday morning after receiving yet another rejection from his son, His Majesty was astonished to receive a request just hours later to ask ‘Pa’ if he could have the rooms after all.

And the answer – which I understand was given directly to Harry – was a firm, ‘No. Sorry but you are too late.’ Certainly not at just 48 hours’ notice.

(L to R) Andy Mundy-Castle, Afua Hirsch, Misan Harriman and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex attend the UK Premiere of ‘Shoot The People’ at Picturehouse Central in London on Monday

Advertisement
It was, as one source described yesterday, the ¿disruption and disrespect¿ to his staff that prompted the King to slap down his younger son

It was, as one source described yesterday, the ‘disruption and disrespect’ to his staff that prompted the King to slap down his younger son

Harry with his children Lilibet and Archie, who he hopes to bring to the UK for a visit

Harry with his children Lilibet and Archie, who he hopes to bring to the UK for a visit

The Palace has highlighted another element in the situation. It was by no means the deciding factor but did add a ‘further degree of complexity’ to things and, it was apparently felt, could have compromised the King’s constitutional position.

Today, judgment will be handed down in the claim at the High Court by the Duke of Sussex against Associated Newspapers, publishers of the Daily Mail, of alleged unlawful information gathering. This has been strongly denied and contested by the Mail.

Advertisement

So why, do you ask, did Harry’s team suddenly issue a dramatic statement yesterday morning announcing he had accepted his father’s offer?

Those in royal circles say there are only two possible theories. First, that Harry hadn’t clearly communicated his father’s response back down to his staff (unlikely given that he was due to arrive in the UK only hours later, surely?). Or second, that it was a clear attempt to try to ‘bounce’ his father into reversing his decision.

But perhaps, there is a third possibility. That the furious prince simply doesn’t care any more and wants to cause his family maximum embarrassment.

Either way, Harry’s arrival last night was once again mired in the same smorgasbord of chaos, confusion, claim and counter-claim that has characterised all of his dealings with Buckingham Palace in recent years.

Advertisement

Hopes among courtiers that the Duke of Sussex could, for once, enjoy a low-key and ‘peaceful’ reconciliation with his father – perhaps with his two beautiful children in tow – are now as much of a pipe dream as ever.

And there are many – even those in royal circles who openly acknowledge the institution hasn’t always handled the ‘Sussex issue’ perfectly – who firmly believe it is a mess entirely of Harry’s own making.

Team Sussex argue that because the duke was thrown an 11th hour curve ball by the Home Office security committee RAVEC, which has declined to reinstate his full-time security while he and his family are in Britain, he has been busy trying to put his own plans in place.

A spokesman said it was ‘disappointing that the offer has been withdrawn . . . at the last moment’.

Advertisement

But it’s also worth noting that the prince’s trip this week to his country of birth has been more than a year in the planning, with a week of official engagements built around a major event in the Midlands on Friday to mark the 12-month countdown to his admirable Invictus Games for injured service personnel.

His team began organising the visit knowing full well that he had conclusively lost a High Court battle against His Majesty’s Government over the Home Office’s decision to strip him of his round-the-clock taxpayer-funded police protection when he chose to leave the UK and relinquish his royal duties.

A decision, it should be noted, that he railed against, accusing the courts, who administer justice in his father’s name, of colluding in an ‘Establishment stitch-up’ and claiming they had made it impossible for him to envisage a time he could ever bring his wife and children back safely.

It simply doesn’t make sense, his critics argue.

Advertisement

My understanding is that Buckingham Palace’s offer of royal lodgings was a genuine one.

However, despite repeated requests for clarity, no formal response to the offer of accommodation at a royal residence to Harry and his family had been received by the ‘necessary deadline’ at the end of last week.

While every effort had been made to facilitate his stay, as a courtesy to staff and others involved, the household does require a minimum level of notice to ensure he could be ‘hosted appropriately’ at a royal residence.

Since this offer was first made, every indication from the duke and his senior team remained that the accommodation was deemed ‘unsuitable’ – despite it being one of the most heavily guarded buildings in the country with men brandishing machine guns on every corner.

Advertisement
There comes a point, sources say, that Charles simply can¿t indulge the ¿constant chaos¿ that comes hand-in-hand with his younger son

There comes a point, sources say, that Charles simply can’t indulge the ‘constant chaos’ that comes hand-in-hand with his younger son

This was a concern which was repeated as late as Saturday morning, in which the prince formally declined the King’s offer once again. A ‘belated request’ was subsequently received later in the day to accept the accommodation offered for Tuesday evening, but by then the appropriate hospitality and staffing provision was no longer available.

Following consultation with the King personally, the decision to turn this down was communicated to Harry ‘through the appropriate channels’.

Asked whether there could be any doubt in Harry’s mind of this decision, a source said they couldn’t comment on the details but that they ‘could confirm the duke was aware’.

Advertisement

Which certainly accounts for the frustration emanating from the Palace yesterday following the unexpected announcement by Team Sussex that the Duke of Sussex would be staying at his father’s official London residence after all.

The Palace’s own pithy rejoinder – with definite shades of ‘recollections may vary’ – came just minutes later, a sign if ever needed of their immense displeasure.

It was clear that the King’s patience had been piqued. There comes a point, sources say, that Charles simply can’t indulge the ‘constant chaos’ that comes hand-in-hand with his younger son.

While some commentators suggested yesterday that the decision was a sign of bad faith – and bad parenting – by the King, who has hundreds of rooms at his disposal, this is a gross misrepresentation and misunderstanding of how both he and the royal household work. The King – who let us not forget is a man still receiving treatment for cancer and has worked throughout his diagnosis – is the last person who wants to pour petrol on the flames of a very fragile familial relationship.

Advertisement

Indeed, I would go so far to as suggest he appears somewhat saddened, although perhaps not surprised, by recent events. But what’s done, is done. So where does all this leave father and son?

Well, I am told that His Majesty still hasn’t ruled out seeing his son at some point over the next few days despite recent provocation, although clearly yesterday’s events have made that all the more difficult.

King Charles has an extremely busy working week with a heavy load of engagements each and every day.

As for meeting the grandchildren, he has barely seen since they were born – and who haven’t even been in the country for four years – that looks more tricky since Harry apparently hasn’t decided yet whether it ‘safe’ to bring them over from their holiday home in Europe.

Advertisement

The prince has, however, made clear that he still wishes to find a way to bring them to Britain towards the end of the week, when his work takes him to the Midlands and beyond.

As far as Buckingham Palace is concerned, it can only be hoped that the next few days go more smoothly than the last, and that such a meeting could be possible.

However, in the words of one insider yesterday: ‘Experience doesn’t lend itself to great confidence in this regard.’

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Cafe No 8 Bistro in York celebrates 24 years in business

Published

on

Cafe No 8 Bistro in York celebrates 24 years in business

Café No.8 Bistro in Gillygate is a neighbourhood bistro known for its fine dining and seasonal menus and said to be one of the best in the city.

Highly acclaimed by diners, it has 4.7 stars out of five on Google, based on 544 reviews.

Tripadvisor awards 4.6 stars out of five, based on 1,871 reviews, ranking it 13th out of 800 York restaurants.

Advertisement

RECOMMENDED READING:

Run by Chris Pragnell and Martin Gore, the café which opened in 2002 says it has stood the test of time thanks to Chris and Martin each playing to their strengths.

Chris shapes the culinary vision in the kitchen, and Martin leads the Front of House. Together, they say they have become a force to be reckoned with.

Chris said: “The hospitality sector has become a lot more competitive in York. Staying open is far more challenging than it was 24 years ago. But Martin and I believe Café No.8 continues to thrive because we put the customer experience before profit.

Advertisement

“We recognise as an informal fine dining restaurant that our pricing is not comparable to say a chain restaurant yet is modest compared to a traditional fine-dining setting.

“We keep our pricing as reasonable as we can ensuring we never compromise on the quality of the ingredients we buy. We source seasonally, and everything is made from scratch in our small on-site kitchen.

“As a result, our menus change regularly, our environmental impact stays low, and our customers get to experience new and exciting dishes every time they visit us.”

Chris says this has helped the bistro develop a loyal following of locals and tourists alike.

Advertisement

He further explained: “We don’t hike up our prices at Christmas or Valentine’s Day. It may not make business sense to some, but we find if our customers have a positive experience with us, the likelier they are to return and recommend us to other – this takes precedence.”

Café No.8 employs a small team of eight, with Chris’ son, Ian working with him in the kitchen who has become a young talented chef.

In recent months, the bistro has pivoted to introduce new changes to the bistro, including being open during the evenings and Sunday Lunch times only to create a better work-life balance for everyone within the business.

The venue has also relaunched its on-site art exhibitions with local artists as well as introduced more dishes to cater for different dietary requirements in preferences.

Advertisement

Martin said: “There’s been a real shift in recent years, with more people choosing meat‑free diets or feeling more confident dining out as allergen‑aware options become more widely available.

“We don’t market ourselves as a specialist dietary‑requirements restaurant, but it is something we can potentially cater for. If customers do have specific needs, we simply ask that they let us know in advance so we can prepare properly.

“For example, a couple recently told us one of them was gluten‑free and wanted to join us for Sunday Lunch. Because they gave us notice, we were able to make a gluten‑free Yorkshire pudding, which, from what they told us, is quite rare to get with a gluten-free Sunday Roast.”

Looking to the future, Chris and Martin now have aspirations to secure Michelin Guide recognition for Café No.8 Bistro.

Advertisement

Martin added: “We’re proud to have achieved many awards over the years, and being recognised by the Michelin Guide would really be the icing on the cake. We’re hopeful that by this time next year we’ll have news to share, and we’re committed to working hard to reach that goal.

“The general feeling among the team is that we offer something genuinely unique: removing the pretence from fine dining and creating a relaxed experience that feels welcoming to all.”

To find out more, visit: www.cafeno8.co.uk

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Preston Davey murderer Jamie Varley’s neighbour reported him to police after ‘nightmare’ incidents

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

WARNING, DISTRESSING CONTENT: The neighbour described the child killer as ‘horrible’ as she spoke out

A former neighbour has described the disturbing warning signs shown by former schoolteacher Jamie Varley years before he sexually abused and murdered his adopted baby boy.

Advertisement

The neighbour described Varley’s household as a ‘nightmare’ and said he was ‘horrible’ to live opposite. Varley, 37, who lived in Grimsargh in Lancashire, is currently serving a whole-life order for the horrific killing of 13-month-old Preston Davey.

On the day of his tragic death on July 27, 2023, defenceless Preston endured two unspeakable sexual assaults at the hands of the secondary school teacher. Varley had climbed the professional ladder to become a head of year and safeguarding lead at South Shore Academy in Blackpool.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

His partner, former public schoolboy John McGowan-Fazakerley, meanwhile, was employed as an accounts manager for a finance firm. Yet beneath this respectable façade lay a deeply disturbing past.

Advertisement

In sharp contrast to his partner’s privileged, middle-class upbringing, Varley was raised on a council estate in Newark.

The second youngest of six children, he moved to Blackpool as a teenager, with no father recorded on his birth certificate, reports Lancs Live. A former neighbour, who lived adjacent to the family’s Victorian mid-terrace home in the Lancashire seaside town, has described the household as an absolute ‘nightmare’.

The woman, a mother-of-five who has fostered around a dozen children, told the Daily Mail: “He [Varley] was horrible. I had to report him to the police and to the housing association for anti-social behaviour and criminal damage but he was never arrested.”

Advertisement

She said she was left concerned for her children’s wellbeing at the time. She said: “He started shouting nasty abuse and ended up throwing lit cigarettes at their toys, trying to set them on fire.”

She added: “I wouldn’t let my children play in the front of the house because of him, not unless I was on the doorstep. When his family moved out [in 2014], we put the flags out. How on earth he got to be a secondary school teacher, I really don’t know.”

Varley began his working life at South Shore Academy as a design and technology technician, before later attending university as a mature student and ultimately qualifying as a textiles teacher. Roughly seven years ago, the killer took a six-week absence from work, with colleagues told his time away was linked to mental health difficulties.

A further unsettling episode arose during the Covid pandemic lockdown, when Varley failed to report for work after allegedly sustaining a back injury. The injury occurred when he tumbled from a ladder or drainpipe while spying on a boyfriend — not McGowan-Fazakerley — whom he suspected of being unfaithful.

Advertisement

Following his sentencing at Preston Crown Court last month, Varley has now been added to the grim roll call of approximately 70 notorious British criminals condemned to die in prison, joining the ranks of Wayne Couzens, Levi Bellfield and Jeremy Bamber.

Preston was born to Sarah Davey, a convicted murderer, on June 16, 2022. Five days after he was born, the 5lb 7oz tot was taken into the care of Oldham Council.

Varley and McGowan-Fazakerley were approved for adoption in January 2023. At the age of nine-months-old, in April 2023, Preston began living at their home in Blackpool, Lancashire.

Advertisement

In the months that followed, Preston was subjected to ever increasing physical, sexual and emotional abuse at the hands of Varley. McGowan-Fazakerley turned a blind eye to the escalating abuse and on July 23 took part in a joint attack on Preston, as he slumped helplessly over the bars of his cot.

On July 27, Preston was carried into Blackpool Victoria Hospital in cardiac arrest. He was pronounced dead at 7.18pm.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

York CAMRA hopes for more Sam Smith’s pubs to re-open

Published

on

York CAMRA hopes for more Sam Smith's pubs to re-open

The campaign group of beer lovers is also hopeful that son Sam Smith taking over the Tadcaster-based brewery from father Humphrey Smith will open relations between both sides.

In recent weeks, preparations have been made to re-open several Sam Smith’s pubs in the area.

The Tankard Inn at Rufforth is due to re-open later this month, as is the Wellington Inn on Alma Terrace, Fishergate.

This follows the re-opening of the Ebor Inn at Bishopthorpe in May.

Advertisement

RECOMMENDED READING:

Nick Love, pub protection officer for York CAMRA, says he has no inside knowledge of goings on at the brewery and he can only judge matters on how better the brewery’s London pubs are doing, which for several years have been run by  son Sam instead of dad Humphrey.

Nick said: “There are definite indications that there has been a significant increase in activity regarding re-opening their closed pubs and also widespread optimism that some of the outdated rules imposed by Humphrey will be relaxed under the tenure of his son Samuel Smith – evidenced by the removal of rules signs in The Royal Oak in Tadcaster recently.”

At present around half of the 300 or so pubs Sam Smith’s Brewery owns are said to be empty, according to a list compiled by Malton man Tom Taverner.

Advertisement

Humphrey Smith, who died last week aged 81. (Image: SWNS)

Social media groups that report matters concerning Sam Smith’s brewery have noted that the brewery is disposing of empty pubs.

Recently, the Corporation Brewery Tap in Doncaster was sold at auction.

The Old Brown Cow pub in Bradford was also recently sold.

Nick Love continued: “Because of the way Samuel Smiths does its business out of the public eye I don’t think we’ll get much transparency on how many pubs they choose to dispose of.

Advertisement

“All we would hope and urge them to do is make sure that any pubs they deem surplus to their estate are then offered to local independent breweries and operators rather than large pub companies and God forbid – property developers.”

In the meantime, York CAMRA is keen to develop better relations with the brewery, putting them on the same footing as other breweries in its area.

Branches of CAMRA typically have a brewery liaison officer that works with the brewery to inform each other of their activities and new products to look out for.

York’s brewery liaison officer Steve Gorton says the branch has received ‘no response’ from Sam Smith’s brewery.

Advertisement

Steve said he wondered if that would change now, adding he might now contact the brewery to find out.

He added: “CAMRA has good relations with the other brewers. We would hope to build a good working relationship with Sam Smith’s Brewery.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Inside England’s Azteca party as John Stones pranks Thomas Tuchel – but Wayne Rooney fears stars are celebrating ‘too soon’ after 3-2 triumph over Mexico

Published

on

John Stones winced as he pointed to his shoulder

Advertisement

John Stones pulled a cheeky prank on Thomas Tuchel as England‘s jubilant stars partied in the dressing room after their stunning 3-2 victory over Mexico at the Azteca Stadium on Monday.

England heroically held on to win at Mexico’s national stadium after being reduced to 10 men early in the second half, showing grit and resilience against adversity to stage one of the Three Lions’ greatest World Cup victories since 1966.

Footage of England’s players celebrating in the dressing room has been shared to social media following the historic win, which has set up an intriguing quarter-final with Erling Haaland‘s Norway on Saturday.

In the video, Declan Rice grabs the attention of his manager Tuchel to indicate that Stones, who defended admirably after coming on in the second half, may have injured his shoulder.

Advertisement

With music blaring in the background, the Manchester City defender begins clutching his right shoulder before Tuchel turns around with a horrified look on his face.

The Man City star then broke out in celebration with Declan Rice

John Stones pranked Thomas Tuchel by pretending he hurt his shoulder after England’s win

Harry Kane and Jude Bellingham inspired England to a heroic 3-2 win over Mexico on Monday

Harry Kane and Jude Bellingham inspired England to a heroic 3-2 win over Mexico on Monday

Advertisement

Stones, wincing in a hunched position, keeps up the charade as the song crescendos and then suddenly pumps the air in time with the music as the beat drops.

Rice, who was in on the act, then cheers and immediately bounces up and down before being joined by the rest of the dressing room, who all saw the funny side.

The video ends with Tuchel heading over to embrace Stones after falling victim to the prank, bursting out laughing with an expression of both relief and amusement. 

England’s official X account posted the footage to social media on Monday, writing with dancing, laughing and fire emojis: ‘John Stones. The energy in the changing room last night.’

Advertisement

The clip has since gone viral with over eight million views at the time of writing, with fans loving the mood inside the dressing room.

BBC pundit Wayne Rooney was not impressed by the stunt however, and fears the Three Lions may be celebrating a touch too early.

Speaking on BBC One after Spain’s 1-0 win over Portugal, he said: ‘I’m a bit more old school. I know you’ve got to enjoy it, but I think it’s a bit too soon.’

Stones may play a crucial role for England in Saturday’s quarter-final against Norway, as he comes face-to-face with former City team-mate Haaland, who has been in remarkable form so far this World Cup with a tally of seven goals.

Advertisement
The manager swung round with a worried expression
He went over to embrace Stones after falling victim to the pratitcal joke

Tuchel looked concerned initially but saw the funny side after it was revealed as a prank

Wayne Rooney wasn't impressed by the prank and fears England are celebrating 'too early'

Wayne Rooney wasn’t impressed by the prank and fears England are celebrating ‘too early’

The centre-half, who is now a free agent, called time on his fruitful 10-year spell at the Etihad at the end of last season.

England were indeed hit with an injury blow during their triumphant Azteca celebrations on Monday after Jordan Henderson suffered a nasty fall over the stadium’s advertising hoardings.

Advertisement

The Brentford midfielder was rushed to hospital with a broken wrist and has thus been ruled out for the remainder of the tournament, although he is set to stay with England’s squad until the end of the World Cup. 

How much is David Beckham set to pocket from his World Cup brand deals? Take on our quiz in our newsletter HERE 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

DR MAX PEMBERTON: Tired? Aching limbs? Here’s why Lyme Disease is on the rise – and my fear that patients are not being told the truth

Published

on

Last year, Justin Timberlake said he was diagnosed with Lyme Disease and suffered from pain on stage. Other celebrities, including Bella Hadid and Shania Twain, have also had the illness

Last month a young woman sat in front of me in my consulting room and told me she was convinced she had Lyme Disease after reading about all the possible symptoms.

She wasn’t the first patient I’ve seen to say this and I’m sure she won’t be the last. Why? Because as diseases go, this one has rather a high profile.

Last summer, Justin Timberlake told his fans that he’d been diagnosed with Lyme Disease. He revealed that he’d been performing with a great deal of nerve pain, had felt worn out and unwell and had a diagnosis for what was troubling him.

He’s just one of a long line of famous faces, including model Bella Hadid, singer Shania Twain and comic Miranda Hart, who’ve all spoken about the same illness.

Advertisement

It seems hardly a week goes by without another article, another celebrity, another warning.

Of course, that’s going to trickle down to the rest of us, including the patients that come through my door.

What the coverage almost never makes clear is that, a good deal of the time, the illness being discussed isn’t ‘Lyme Disease’ at all. It’s something called ‘Chronic Lyme Disease’. And the two are not the same thing.

Advertisement

Last year, Justin Timberlake said he was diagnosed with Lyme Disease and suffered from pain on stage. Other celebrities, including Bella Hadid and Shania Twain, have also had the illness

To be clear, there is an infection, spread by the bite of a tick and caused by a bacterium called Borrelia. That is Lyme Disease. The first sign is often a spreading rash, sometimes in the shape of a bullseye, though fewer than half of patients ever develop one.

Flu-like aches and tiredness can follow. Left untreated, it can do serious damage: a drooping of the face, inflammation of the heart and painful swollen joints that surface months or even years later.

So this isn’t an illness to shrug off and I’ve nothing but sympathy for anyone who has been dismissed by a doctor who never thought to ask about a tick bite.

Advertisement

Caught early, though, it’s treated much like any other bacterial infection, with a short course of antibiotics, usually doxycycline. For the vast majority of people that clears it, and that’s the end of the matter.

Recorded cases are creeping up. In England last year there were about 1,170 confirmed, against 959 the year before.

Warmer, longer summers certainly give ticks more time to feed, yet much of the increase can be attributed to the fact we’re all more alert to Lyme now, more likely to spot the signs and get tested. None of that adds up to an epidemic.

However, the word ‘Lyme’ has become stretched to cover something quite different and this is what’s muddying the waters.

Advertisement

Chronic Lyme Disease is the claim that a whole raft of vague, persistent symptoms: headaches, exhaustion, aching muscles, the fog that settles over your thinking, are all the work of a hidden Borrelia infection.

The trouble is that there’s often no clear history of an infection in the first place. The standard tests come back negative.

Rather than accept that, sufferers frequently become convinced the tests themselves must be wrong. Some go as far as sending blood samples to private laboratories abroad, which run their own unregulated tests, with no evidence behind them, that will then hand back a positive result.

It’s easy to see why this happens. A label, any label, is easier to carry than being told nobody knows what’s wrong with you.

Advertisement
Lyme Disease is an infection spread by the bite of a tick and caused by a bacterium called Borrelia. But, Dr Max Pemberton explains, this is easily treatable if caught early

Lyme Disease is an infection spread by the bite of a tick and caused by a bacterium called Borrelia. But, Dr Max Pemberton explains, this is easily treatable if caught early

And it’s nothing new. In 2007, a landmark paper in the New England Journal of Medicine looked hard at Chronic Lyme Disease and found no convincing evidence the symptoms had anything to do with Borrelia.

Study after study has since failed to turn up any evidence that symptoms are due to a lingering infection.

As for treatments, patient groups press for long courses of antibiotics, sometimes running to many months. Yet controlled trials show they work no better than a placebo, while carrying serious risks of their own.

Advertisement

That hasn’t stopped a handful of doctors, some aligned with campaign groups, insisting the guidelines are too timid and that patients need ever-longer treatment. Other evidence gets wheeled out too but it rarely stands up to scrutiny. A pilot study this year, for example, hailed in some reports as a breakthrough, gave psilocybin, the active ingredient in magic mushrooms, to people with lasting Lyme symptoms who reported big improvements in their condition.

Impressive, until you read the detail. Only 20 people took part in the trial, there was no comparison group and everyone knew exactly what they’d taken. That’s not proof of anything.

I want to tread carefully here, because the distress these patients feel is not in question. They are unwell, and they deserve to be taken seriously. Only that isn’t the same as signing up to a diagnosis that doesn’t hold.

If the symptoms aren’t caused by an infection, more antibiotics won’t help.

Advertisement

The kindest thing we can do for these patients isn’t to nod along, it’s to tell them the truth and look at the whole picture. And that, very often, means considering causes that have nothing to do with a tick.

Picture of Kate says so much

What a lovely photograph of the Princess of Wales at the summit of Snowdon. 

She had taken on the National Three Peaks Challenge, climbing the highest mountains in Scotland, England and Wales in 24 hours… in the rain.

The resilient Princess of Wales, seen with a fellow climber on the summit of Mount Snowdon, serves as a reminder of how important it is to care for one's mind after recovery

The resilient Princess of Wales, seen with a fellow climber on the summit of Mount Snowdon, serves as a reminder of how important it is to care for one’s mind after recovery

Advertisement

She did it in aid of the Royal Marsden, the hospital that treated her cancer, and also to raise awareness of ‘life beyond diagnosis’. That phrase really resonated with me. 

Health services are generally great at the sharp end of illness: the scans, the surgery, the drugs. What comes after can be another matter. So many people who’ve come through something frightening are left with an anxiety that won’t switch off. 

What Catherine seems to grasp is that recovery is about the whole person, not just the disease. Being outdoors, moving, setting yourself a hard physical target and reaching it, can do things for the mind that no prescription manages.

Good news for coffee lovers. People drinking five or more cups a day were found to be 47 per cent less likely to develop liver cancer and a third less likely to develop cirrhosis, a study of more than 355,000 adults shows. Decaf drinkers saw similar benefits. Not that I’m urging anyone to start downing five cups a day. If you want to look after your liver, go easy on alcohol, keep your weight in check and stay active. Still, that morning cup may quietly be doing you a good turn. 

Advertisement

Dr Max prescribes… 

The Happiness Lab

We think we know what will make us happy. A pay rise, bigger house, expensive holiday. We’re usually wrong. 

In this warm and waffle-free podcast, the Yale psychologist Dr Laurie Santos, pictured, takes the science of wellbeing, drawn from the most popular course her university has ever run, and turns it into something you can use. 

Well worth a listen and guaranteed to get you rethinking what true happiness really is. 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Exclusive beach club brand loved by Leonardo DiCaprio and Gigi Hadid forced to close Turkish location due to dispute with local provider

Published

on

Scorpios in Bodrum on the Turkish Riviera has been forced to close temporarily due to an ongoing dispute with a local business partner

A star-studded holiday destination in Bodrum, Turkey, has been forced to shut its doors following a dispute with a local business partner.

The beachside experience and club on the Turkish Riviera is a hotspot for wellbeing fanatics, and boasts Eastern Mediterranean cuisine with subtle Mexican influences.

With another location in Mykonos, Greece, the brand is a favourite with many celebrities, including Lindsay Lohan and Rita Ora.

With 12 bungalows complete with private pools and expansive decks perfect for entertaining, it is a truly elite destination where you can stay overnight, too.

Advertisement

Situated on the Aegean coast, other fans of Scorpios include Gigi Hadid and Leonardo DiCaprio.

Today, Bodrum boasts ultra-luxury brands including Mandarin Oriental, EDITION and Maxx Royal, while Mykonos favourite Scorpios has chosen the peninsula for only its second permanent outpost. 

However, a string of measures imposed by a local business partner have meant it has been forced to shut down temporarily.

Advertisement

Scorpios in Bodrum on the Turkish Riviera has been forced to close temporarily due to an ongoing dispute with a local business partner

Celebrity guests to Scorpios include Lindsay Lohan (pictured) as well as supermodel Gigi Hadid

Celebrity guests to Scorpios include Lindsay Lohan (pictured) as well as supermodel Gigi Hadid

It closed just weeks into the 2026 summer season for a handful of reasons, including operational problems that have significantly impacted the venue.

According to a source close to Scorpios, there are restrictions preventing Scorpios’ onsite ambulance and doctors from accessing the property, placing a limit on safety.

Advertisement

Additionally, there are restrictions on bringing ice onto the property, creating food safety and hygiene concerns.

Delivery windows have also been reduced to a one-hour period.

Meanwhile, the overnight demolition of the guest gatehouse and removal of the parking area mean guests would have to park on a public road and walk to the entrance.

There has also reportedly been a reduction in licensed operating hours.

Advertisement

A statement from Scorpios posted on Instagram over the weekend read: ‘We regret to inform you that Scorpios Bodrum will temporarily cease business operations as of today and until further notice due to differences with our local business partner that could not be resolved so far.’

‘Under the current circumstances being imposed on us, we are no longer able to operate in a way that meets the standards, values and responsibilities we hold ourselves to.’

‘At Scorpios, we have always been committed to delivering the best possible experience while ensuring the wellbeing and safety of our guests, employees, artists and suppliers.’

The resort is one of a string of luxury properties in Turkey's Bodrum

The resort is one of a string of luxury properties in Turkey’s Bodrum

Advertisement

‘We sincerely hope that the current issues can be resolved and that we will be able to welcome our community back to Scorpios Bodrum in the near future.’

Fans were understandably disappointed, with one commenting: ‘Sad. One of the most beautiful places in the world.’

Another chimed in: ‘Come back stronger. Scorpios is one of Bodrum’s iconic symbols.’

A third wrote: ‘It takes real integrity to walk away when the conditions no longer align with your values. The Scorpios family has always stood for excellence, transparency, and genuine care for its community. 

Advertisement

‘Scorpios Bodrum is a beautiful project, but no location is worth compromising the principles that built the brand. Looking forward to seeing Scorpios thrive again under the right circumstances and in the right location.’

A fourth added: ‘Turkey lost again. Scorpios was the biggest entertainment brand that ever came to Turkey.’ 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

NATO unveils military projects to boost defense spending

Published

on

NATO unveils military projects to boost defense spending

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — NATO on Tuesday will showcase a series of new military projects worth billions of dollars in an attempt to convince U.S. President Donald Trump that the allies are stepping up defense spending and converting investment into real firepower.

At an event dubbed the “big reveal,” several leaders are due to announce new deals with defense companies, plenty of them in the United States. Trump has branded NATO a “paper tiger” that would cease to function without American arms and leadership.

“We will announce tens of billions in new contracts that will provide the crucial kit we need to deter and defend,” NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte told reporters on the eve of the military alliance’s two-day summit in Turkey.

The defense industry splash comes a few weeks after Rutte tried to ease U.S. concerns about military spending at NATO with a new pitch using a chart labeled the “The Trump Trillion” — showing $1.2 trillion in spending by European allies and Canada since 2017.

Advertisement

Far from being impressed, Trump appeared unmoved, saying he was still disappointed at some NATO allies’ refusal to join the Iran war, which he had launched alongside Israel without consulting them.

“We don’t need their money — we don’t need anything,” Trump said. “I just want loyalty.”

NATO surveillance planes up for renewal

Among the contracts to be unveiled, many of them drawn up and some signed long before the summit, is expected to be one to replace NATO’s aging fleet of surveillance planes.

NATO as an organization does not own any weaponry — these are the property of the 32 member countries — but it does have a fleet of AWACs aircraft that are about 50 years old and some newer surveillance drones.

Advertisement

Some of the other projects will notably be paid for with funds from a system of cheap loans for defense purposes set up by the European Union, comprising up to $170 billion raised on capital markets.

“We need to ensure that we are translating our economic might into military capabilities, putting the cash to work from defense plans to drones, from money to missiles and interceptors,” Rutte said.

The summit is being held in President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s sprawling palace compound in Ankara and Trump has suggested he would come bearing gifts for the Turkish leader.

Netanyahu opposes jet sales to Turkey

But speaking Monday on the morning show “Fox & Friends,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged the U.S. not to sell F-35 fighter jets to Turkey, saying that Erdogan “calls openly for the annihilation of Israel.” Turkey and Israel have acrimonious relations. Erdogan frequently accuses Israel of committing genocide in its war in Gaza, triggered by the deadly Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on southern Israel.

Advertisement

Turkey was barred from the F-35 program in 2019, after it purchased Russian-made S-400 missile defense systems. However, Trump, who has warm relations with Erdogan, has hinted ahead of his planned visit to Ankara for the NATO summit that the sales could soon resume.

Netanyahu said selling Turkey F-35s would “upset the power balance in the Middle East, which is ultimately guaranteed by Israeli air superiority and also, I think, by America’s posture in the Middle East.”

Israel’s Air Force depends on hundreds of U.S. fighter jets, including F-35s, F-16s and F-15s.

Seeking a stronger Europe for a stronger NATO

The focus of the summit is a stronger Europe for a stronger NATO. The Trump administration has warned the allies that they must handle Europe’s security alone as the United States focuses on China and the Indo-Pacific region.

The Pentagon wants a reboot and is promoting what it calls “NATO 3.0,” a vision of the alliance in which Europe assumes greater responsibility for its own defense, freeing the U.S. to concentrate on other priorities.

But hiking defense spending means increasing taxes or diverting resources from other priorities. U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey unexpectedly quit last month, saying the government was not willing to spend at a time of rising threats.

Advertisement

Concern is mounting among some northern and central eastern countries that Russia might be preparing a hybrid attack — a combination of conventional warfare with tactics like cyberattacks — on the continent as Russian President Vladimir Putin struggles to secure victory in Ukraine.

Keir Starmer’s office said the British leader will be “focused on building a stronger and more European NATO” on what is likely to be his last foreign trip as prime minister.

Starmer, who announced his resignation June 22, has faced criticism from military leaders, opposition politicians and some in his center-left party for the slow rate of increase in U.K. military spending.

His government has committed to reach the NATO budget target of spending 3.5% of gross domestic product on defense by 2035 but does not have a concrete plan to get there. Its current spending plan will see that spending hit 2.7% of GDP by 2029.

Advertisement

___

Associated Press writer Jill Lawless in London contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Nato summit will reveal how alliance plans to manage European security as US cuts back its support

Published

on

Nato summit will reveal how alliance plans to manage European security as US cuts back its support

Two massive Russian attacks on Kyiv in less than a week, renewed Iranian threats in the Strait of Hormuz, and a security crackdown in Turkey are just three of the immediate issues shaping the context of the Nato summit in Ankara on July 7-8.

While Ukraine and Iran will be on Nato’s agenda, the authoritarian drift of its host, Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, will be politely overlooked. But as ever, the summit outcome will be determined by the position of the United States.

At last year’s Hague summit, the Nato-sceptical US president, Donald Trump, was placated by the allies’ commitment to spend 5% of their GDP annually on defence by 2035. The challenge this year will be to demonstrate sufficient progress towards that goal, while also addressing Trump’s vision of “Nato 3.0” – involving, according to his secretary of war, Pete Hegseth, “a balanced alliance with Europe in the lead for its own defence”.

Progress towards defence spending appears reasonably on track. In 2025 alone, the Atlantic Council notes: “European allies and Canada increased defence spending by 20% from the previous calendar year.” Six Nato allies (the three Baltic states plus Denmark, Poland and Norway)
spent more on defence as a share of GDP than the US. Germany, not among that group in 2025, nonetheless has big ambitions. In absolute terms, it is now Nato’s second biggest defence spender.

Advertisement

The allies have also made strenuous efforts to wean themselves off American-sourced defence systems. But bumps in the road remain. Whereas in 2025, all the Nato allies (bar Iceland, which has no armed forces) met Nato’s 2024 standard of spending 2% of GDP on defence, this will not be repeated in 2026. The Czech government and Hungary are likely to dip below the target. And many spending commitments still need to translate into concrete capabilities. Europe’s defence industries are working flat out, but are at the limits of how fast they can absorb new investment.

The success of the summit may just be down to luck and the volatile mood of the US president. Trump seems unable to accept that the Nato allies have made genuine progress in defence. He claimed just days before departing for Ankara it was “ridiculous” that the US continues to support a “one-sided” Nato. That grievance appears to be one reason the meeting may withdraw its endorsement of Albania – a low-spending Nato member – as the 2027 summit venue.

Things could also prove tricky on another of Trump’s pet complaints – the lack of Nato support for the US-Israeli war with Iran. The Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte (who chairs the summit), seems determined to avoid getting too deeply into discussion of the situation.

But if it does intrude, safety will likely be found in the formulation recently agreed by the G7 – welcoming the US-Iran deal, condemning Iran’s nuclear ambitions and supporting a Franco-British led maritime operation in the Strait of Hormuz. Don’t expect a Nato coordinating role in any operation, however. On that, there is no allied consensus.

Advertisement

United approach on Ukraine war

There will be greater scope at the summit for dealing with Russia’s war against Ukraine and the broader threat to European security that emanates from the Kremlin. The Trump administration has grown increasingly distrusting of Putin and, in parallel, more impressed with the Ukrainian war effort.

This has translated into some positives for Ukraine: the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, will be at the summit, attending the Nato-Ukraine Council and the Ukraine Defence Contact (Ramstein) Group meetings, which coordinate western support for Ukraine.

He will be hoping for more concrete commitments similar to British and German defence packages for Ukraine. Nato’s Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (Purl) initiative, launched last summer, has also already been a big success in keeping arms and other military aid flowing to Ukraine.

Much discussion will focus on the need to help Ukraine defend itself against heacy Russian bombardments like the ones recently experienced in Kyiv and other cities.
EPA/Sergey Dolzhenko

That initiative will be reaffirmed at Ankara, signalling a clear commitment to Ukraine-Europe defence links. But the allies still lack a consensus on offering Nato membership to Ukraine. The US is adamantly against it. So a pathway to accession will not be spelled out at the summit.

Advertisement

Where’s China?

Other items missing from the agenda at Ankara will also reflect the Trump administration’s priorities. It’s no surprise that climate change and Women Peace and Security – a UN-led initiative which recognises and fosters women’s contribution to peacekeeping – have fallen out of favour. Both issues figured in Nato communiques during the Biden period – both disappeared from last year’s Hague summit declaration. Don’t expect a mention at Ankara.

More curious, though, is the lowered priority given to China. Nato’s 2019 London declaration contained Nato’s first ever summit-level statement on China, recognising that the nation’s growing influence brought challenges as well as opportunities – a move engineered by the first Trump administration. Then, Nato’s relevance to the US was judged by how it was positioned in the emerging era of “strategic competition”.

Under Biden a similar logic applied, reinforced by the 2024 Washington summit’s description of China as the “decisive enabler of Russia’s war against Ukraine”. And yet China disappeared from the 2025 Hague declaration. It was not discussed at Nato’s recent foreign and defence ministerials. Neither is it expected to figure at Ankara.

Why not? The Trump administration’s recent efforts at accommodation with China are part of the answer. Other allies too are happy to see China sidelined from Nato’s business. France, easily perturbed by a globalist Nato, had always been a sceptic when it comes to including China in Nato’s agenda. Many east European allies, meanwhile, see a China focus as distracting Nato from Russia. And big exporters like Germany need to keep Beijing sweet, given the shrinkage of their Russian market.

Advertisement

The summit declaration will again be short to avoid controversy. But like an iceberg, much lies below the surface. The detailed work of moving to “Nato 3.0” was already agreed at the Nato defence ministerial in mid June. Most of the gaps in Nato’s European defence plans occasioned by recent US force announcements have already been plugged.

The summit will give rise to much noise, but Nato’s ongoing adaptation to the new reality engendered by shifting US priorities suggests a high degree of underlying resilience.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Woman ‘exploited vulnerable prostitutes’ in Cambridge brothel

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

Evidence showed that the woman had deposits of more than £55k into her bank from running the brothel

A woman who ran a brothel in Cambridge has been sentenced. Sio Cheok, 58, first came to Cambridgeshire Police’s attention following reports of anti-social behaviour and frequent visitors to a property in Histon Road in 2025.

Advertisement

Officers attended the address on May 20, 2025, and found Cheok and a suspected sex worker inside. They also discovered a massage bed and sex-related paraphernalia, including condoms and lubricants.

Two mobile phones were seized. These contained evidence of Cheok arranging appointments and communicating with both clients and workers.

Cheok was arrested and released on bail with conditions. However, further enquiries and welfare checks carried out in December revealed she breached the conditions.

Further investigation showed more than £55,000 had been paid into her bank accounts through cash deposits and third-party payments over a 12-month period.

Advertisement

At Peterborough Crown Court on Friday (July 3), Cheok, of Chesterton Road, Cambridge, was sentenced to 16 months in prison, suspended for two years. She previously pleaded guilty to controlling prostitution for gain between June 2024 and December 2025. She must also carry out 120 hours of unpaid work.

Detective Constable Steph Barnes-Dunlop, who investigated, said: “Cheok was motivated by financial gain and exploited vulnerable women for her own benefit. Through a thorough investigation, we were able to build a strong body of evidence which demonstrated her role in controlling prostitution activity from the property.

“We work closely with partner agencies to safeguard those involved in sex work and identify anyone who may be at risk of exploitation. I hope this sends a clear message that we will not tolerate those who seek to profit from the exploitation of others.

“If you are being exploited in any way then I urge you to contact us, or Crimestoppers, so we can help you turn your life around.”

Advertisement

Officers are now taking steps under the Proceeds of Crime Act to ensure she does not benefit financially from her criminality.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

New HMRC August 2026 deadline warning for UK workers

Published

on

Wales Online

HMRC is pushing ahead with its tax overhaul

Sole traders and landlords are confronting a crucial deadline as HMRC presses forward with its contentious transformation of the tax system.

Advertisement

The tax authority is urgently attempting to dispel “myths” surrounding its Making Tax Digital (MTD) scheme following evidence that vast numbers of those impacted have still not registered – mere weeks before their initial submission falls due. In a message posted on social media, HMRC delivered a stark reminder to the self-employed emphasising that every three months they must use compatible software to submit digital records of income and expenditure.

The statement continued by clarifying who is impacted. Crucially, anyone enrolled in MTD must send an update for each income source, including self-employment and property income.

Millions dragged into ‘digital’ net

The reform impacts sole traders and landlords with a combined turnover exceeding £50,000 annually – with HMRC calculating that 864,000 people would be caught in this opening phase, all obliged to submit their first quarterly update via HMRC-approved software by August 7.

Advertisement

However, early indications suggest many are being taken by surprise. Statistics reveal that just one week after the system launched, only 250,000 people had registered – and the overwhelming majority of those, almost 170,000, had enrolled through tax agents and accountancy practices rather than registering personally.

Campaigners worry the actual number of those yet to sign up could reach hundreds of thousands. Perhaps anticipating difficulties, the Chancellor acted last year to ease the impact, confirming that no penalties would be imposed for late quarterly submissions during the 2026/27 tax year — a concession viewed by detractors as an implicit acknowledgement that the system’s implementation has been disorganised.

A long and troubled road

Making Tax Digital is not a recent initiative. The scheme was originally subject to consultation back in 2016, forming part of HMRC’s ambition to modernise its handling of taxpayer information.

Certain aspects of the programme, including MTD for VAT, have been operational for years, yet the income tax component has been continually delayed following numerous postponements owing to its intricacy.

Advertisement

Under the regulations finally coming into force this year, the era of the shoebox stuffed with crumpled receipts is drawing to a close. Taxpayers brought within the regime must abandon pen-and-paper bookkeeping and instead record every transaction electronically, submitting running totals to HMRC four times a year rather than completing a single annual return.

Officials maintain the reform is intended to provide taxpayers with a clearer, more current understanding of their liabilities. According to HMRC’s own guidance, once a quarterly update has been filed, users will be able to see an estimate of their tax bill for their self-employment and property income in their software or in their HMRC online services account.

Content cannot be displayed without consent

The key dates

The first cohort – those already trading with income above £50,000 – must have started keeping digital records from 6 April 2026.

The critical dates that follow are:

Advertisement
  • August 7, 2026 – deadline for the first quarterly update
  • November 7, 2026 – second quarterly update
  • January 31, 2027 – last “old style” Self Assessment return, covering 2025/26
  • February 7, 2027 – third quarterly update
  • May 27, 027 – fourth quarterly update
  • January 31, 2028 – first year-end declaration filed directly through MTD software, covering 2026/27

A second wave of taxpayers, with lower turnover thresholds, will be dragged into the system in the following two years.

Penalties on the horizon

Although there is a grace period for late quarterly submissions this year, taxpayers have been cautioned against becoming complacent. From next year, a new points-based penalty system comes into effect, similar to driving licence endorsements – accumulate too many points for missed deadlines, and a fixed financial penalty will follow.

Accountants have urged their clients not to leave matters until the eleventh hour, cautioning that mistakes made in the first submission can carry through every subsequent filing, as each quarterly update builds cumulatively upon the last rather than being treated as a standalone return.

For the time being, HMRC’s message to those affected is straightforward: get registered, ensure your software is in order, and don’t let August 7 catch you off guard.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025