A logistics firm has been granted an interim licence to operate lorries round the clock at the controversial Astley Business Park
Logistics firm Whistl has started round-the-clock operations at the controversial ‘cruise ship’ warehouse complex in Tyldesley.
The company began trading at unit 2 at the Astley Business Park on Monday (July 20) after being granted an interim licence by the traffic commissioner regarding heavy goods vehicle movements.
The firm previously agreed a 15-year lease for the unit with the intention of moving their local operation from the nearby Logistics North complex near Bolton. The now completed development has been dogged by controversy for more than a year since building work started.
Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter
Many residents, some of whom have gardens just 30 metres from the 350,000 sq ft logistics site, criticised the huge scale and appearance of the ‘towering warehouses’.
Incidents of flooding on nearby paths and gardens have also occurred last winter with complaints that run off from the construction site was causing the issues.
Whistl said it ‘appreciate[s] the strength of feeling amongst the community over the new business park’, insisting it has had an ‘active dialogue’ with the action group representing residents before taking measures to mitigate the impact of operations.
It is understood 250 objections have been lodged with the Traffic Commissioner to the goods vehicle operator’s licence application to keep 60 goods vehicles and 95 trailers at the site.
The interim approval manages the use of the operating centre while the full application remains under consideration.
The interim approval allows no more than 50 HGV movements into or out of the operating centre between the hours of 10pm and 5am, except between 5pm on Saturday and 9am on Sunday, when no movements are authorised.
On Wednesday (July 22), at around 12.30pm around 70 to 80 non-branded vehicles could be seen on the unit’s car park and on the other site of the huge shed several Whistl branded HGVs and vans were present, with frequent lorry movements on and off the site.
Several large orange signs are attached to the exterior of the huge shed stating ‘keep noise to a minimum’.
Astley Warehouse Action Group has been challenging aspects of the planning process and highlighting complaints of those it says are impacted by the logistics development.
On the goods vehicle application, they said a 24-hour logistics operation raises serious questions about ‘noise, sleep disturbance, air quality, vibration, lighting and traffic safety and whether residents can reasonably enjoy their own homes’.
John Peters, who represents the action group, said: “Whistl are now carrying out their normal operations. The big problem is they should never have been placed next to so many houses and a school.
“It’s the impact on families and kids. We’ve met with Whistl, they’ve put signs around the place about keeping noise down. They’ve also agreed to mist over some of their windows which face houses so people can’t look into bedrooms at night.
“They are trying to mitigate a lot of the things we asked them to but the crux of the problem is the sheds shouldn’t be there.”
A spokesperson for Whistl said: “We have been in active dialogue with the local resident’s association regarding our plans to move to the business park and how we will operate.
“We have listened to their concerns about light and noise and where possible taken measures to mitigate the impact of our operations within the approved permissions to operate a 24/7 logistics business from the site.
“We began operating from the business park on Monday and will continue to listen and make changes where practicable as we appreciate the strength of feeling amongst the community over the new business park.”
A letter to the action group from the Traffic Commissioner’s office assured it that ‘the grant of an interim licence does not determine the outcome of the full application’.
It added: “The Traffic Commissioner will consider all relevant information, including the validity and content of the representations received, before reaching a final decision.
“The Traffic Commissioner may determine that a public inquiry is required before a decision can be made on the application.
“If this is the case all valid representors will be notified and provided with an opportunity to attend and participate in that process.”



You must be logged in to post a comment Login