A jury will decide whether or not Meta designed its apps to “hook the users, hold them for as long as they can, harvest their data and hide the truth from the public”
Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, has been accused of contributing to the youth mental health crisis by knowingly and deliberately designing features that addict children to its platforms.
California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey are seeking billions of dollars in damages as well as fundamental changes to how Meta runs its platforms. The states claim Meta gathers data from children aged 13 without the consent of their parents, a major breach of US federal law if proven accurate.
The lawsuit also argues that Meta routinely collects data on children under 13 without their parents’ consent, in violation of federal law. The company strongly denies the allegations.
The trial started in a California federal court on Tuesday, August 18. A jury will decide whether or not the tech giant designed its apps to “hook the users, hold them for as long as they can, harvest their data and hide the truth from the public,” as Megan O’Neill, a deputy attorney general for the California Department of Justice, put it in her opening statement.
Here’s everything you need to know about the opening day of the trial…
What allegations does Meta face?
The lawsuit alleges Meta illegally collected and used data of children aged under 13 who were using its social media platforms. It also claimed the company made decisions in designing its platforms that drove excessive use “and put young users at risk, and lied to users, their families, and the public about the safety of its platforms.”
The US Attorney Generals allege Meta violated federal and state laws, including the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) as well as the New Jersey Consumer Protection Act. COPPA, introduced in 1998, many years before Meta’s founding, requires websites, apps as well as other online services to gain verified parental consent before collecting data from children aged under 13.
The lawsuit, originally filed in 2023, also claims “harmful” features on Instagram and Facebook drove excessive use by children and teenagers that caused them to be distracted at school and disrupted their ability to sleep at night, “all the while misleading users, their families, and the public about the existence and severity of these risks.”
The opening statements
O’Neill told the court: “You’re going to hear that Meta knew a lot about kids’ brains.” This includes how they are constantly seeking rewards, how they are sensitive to social feedback and “how they are still developing their ability to control impulses the way adults do.”
Meta, she said, researched these vulnerabilities and talked about how it could change Instagram to respond to them. She said: “‘The young ones are the best ones’ is a title of a Meta study we are going to show you.”
Meta, O’Neill said, also knew that kids under 13 were using its products even though they were banned from it, and “failed to take the simplest most obvious steps to keep them off.”
Meta executive Arturo Béjar gives evidence
Former Meta executive Arturo Béjar, who worked as an engineering director at Facebook from 2009 to 2015, was the first witness to be called.
Béjar said that, contrary to Meta’s statements, the company’s research on safety issues was not being used to improve products. For example, regarding eating disorder content, Meta’s engineers “had very good ideas on how to make it better” so that users, especially young ones, would not be exposed to it.
“But once it was reviewed, it got whittled down to a little pebble that didn’t make a difference,” he said.
Meta attorney highlights company work on safety
Meta lawyer Paul Schmidt said he will focus on the work Meta does to make its platforms safer and share information with the public.
He said: “Much of this lawsuit is about the government attorneys and their witnesses saying in trying to improve, we’d do it a little differently. In talking about how to improve, we disagree with how you talk about it. It’s meaningful, and the evidence will be meaningful, these efforts Meta has taken to improve.”
The proceedings
The proceedings are expected to last six weeks. The trial is expected to hear testimony from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other executives as well as former employees.
U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland is overseeing the trial.
If Meta loses the trial, the court would have wide discretion over the size of any financial penalty. Meta has said if it loses, the case could result in damages amounting to $1.4 trillion, but legal experts believe that would be unlikely.





You must be logged in to post a comment Login