Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

A ‘Plop’ Holiday Could Be A Game-Changer If Travelling Feels Stressful

Published

on

"There is no better balm for the soul that is overtaxed by all the daily logistics of running a career and having a house full of kids than plopping down by a pool and having a waiter come take your drink order and bring you lunch by the pool," said Caroline Chambers, who coined the term "plop vacation."

There are trips where you pack every waking moment full of sightseeing, activities and excursions. And then there are trips you spend mostly horizontal: laying in a lounge chair, reading a book, sipping on a cold beverage and occasionally getting up for a dip in the ocean or pool.

The latter is what cookbook author and mum-of-four Caroline Chambers aptly refers to as a “plop vacation.”

A “plop” holiday is one in which you “wake up in the morning and pack a pool or beach bag, and literally plop by the pool or beach for the entire day,” Chambers explained in a comment on an Instagram post from a Mexico trip she and her family took earlier this year.

It’s similar to what folks in the travel world call a “fly and flop,” Chambers, author of the forthcoming What to Cook When You Don’t Feel Like Cooking: Make It Fast, told HuffPost.

Advertisement

“My sister is a luxury travel agent, and I often see her talking about this type of vacation where you fly to a destination and then basically flop down and don’t leave for the rest of the week,” she said. “Some people call it ‘flop.’ I call it ‘plop.’”

Certain travellers might look down on trips that don’t maximise time away by trying to see more, do more, learn more. And that kind of perspective-widening travel does have its benefits. Chambers herself loves “really, really adventurous travel where you are getting off the beaten path, seeing a local community in a way that you never could otherwise,” she said.

 "There is no better balm for the soul that is overtaxed by all the daily logistics of running a career and having a house full of kids than plopping down by a pool and having a waiter come take your drink order and bring you lunch by the pool," said Caroline Chambers, who coined the term "plop vacation."

Thomas Barwick via Getty Images

“There is no better balm for the soul that is overtaxed by all the daily logistics of running a career and having a house full of kids than plopping down by a pool and having a waiter come take your drink order and bring you lunch by the pool,” said Caroline Chambers, who coined the term “plop vacation.”

But there are also some notable upsides to holidays of the plop variety.

“Sometimes you just need to completely reset your nervous system and not have to deal with any logistics,” Chambers said. “There is no better balm for the soul that is overtaxed by all the daily logistics of running a career and having a house full of kids than plopping down by a pool and having a waiter come take your drink order and bring you lunch by the pool.”

Advertisement

Plop vacations are great for anyone who just wants to rest and recharge their battery. But they can be particularly enjoyable and (relatively) low-stress for people with young kids. Just pack a bag with everything your family needs for the day: “snacks, diapers, toys, all of it, minimising schlepping as much as possible,” said Chambers.

“It allows the parents to actually feel relaxed afterwards because our needs are being taken care of too,” Chambers said. “We can sit by the pool and have a margarita and order our kids’ lunch.”

Kelsey Pomeroy is a content creator who specialises in parenting and travel with kids, and has two young children of her own. When she hears the term “plop vacation,” she pictures “setting it all down and letting it all go, a rare treat in the life of parents to young kids,” she told HuffPost. It’s appealing because “schlepping stuff around is “the bane of [her] existence,” Pomeroy said.

Plopping with little kids in tow is not going to be as tranquil as plopping child-free. But it can still be pretty relaxing.

Advertisement

“A plop vacation is what people imagine when they think of the word ‘vacation,’ and I love the idea that even if it isn’t the same as a vacation was pre-kids, you can still plop and achieve pockets of peace throughout the day,” Pomeroy said.

As Chambers wrote in a post on her Substack, even though your kid is “spilling half of your margarita before you can even take a sip,” she still finds it “very restful and fun.” And if you need some grown-up plop time, you can sign the kids up for camp at the resort or book a local sitter, she said.

As parents and caregivers know, it can sometimes feel intimidating to leave the house – let alone leave the country – with young kids.

“So whether the beat of your family is to run around all day or plop, I love seeing easy frameworks like ‘plop vacations’ making traveling with little kids feel more accessible,” Pomeroy said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

How Much Money Do OnlyFans Models Make?

Published

on

"I’m making roughly over a million dollars a month right now, which still feels surreal to say out loud. But I’ve worked incredibly hard to build this business and make it successful," said Skylar Mae.

OnlyFans launched in 2016 as a social media platform designed to help influencers, musicians and other creators connect directly with their fans through paid subscriptions.

Adult content creators, in particular, flourished on the platform, with some earning six figures annually – and others bringing in that much in a single month.

While that kind of money may sound enticing in a “should-I-quit-my-day-job-and-give-it-a-shot?” kind of way, the work isn’t easy.

OnlyFans creators say that building a fan base, streamlining your workflow and maintaining a content calendar takes far more strategy and consistency than many people realise.

Advertisement

Plus, the platform itself can be unpredictable: in 2021, OnlyFans announced plans to ban sexually explicit content, only to reverse course days later following intense backlash.

What does it take to make bank on the site? What kind of explicit content are they offering, exactly?

Below, OnlyFans adult content creators who are making it work delve into that, and what they think of the recent controversial Euphoria storyline involving Sydney Sweeney’s character, Cassie, joining the site.

Responses have been edited and condensed for clarity.

Advertisement

Skylar Mae: “I’m making roughly over $1 million dollars a month right now.”

"I’m making roughly over a million dollars a month right now, which still feels surreal to say out loud. But I’ve worked incredibly hard to build this business and make it successful," said Skylar Mae.
“I’m making roughly over a million dollars a month right now, which still feels surreal to say out loud. But I’ve worked incredibly hard to build this business and make it successful,” said Skylar Mae.

“I got into OnlyFans while I was in dental school. My family was struggling with medical bills after Covid, and I wanted a way to help support them financially. At first, I saw it as a side hustle, but it quickly became my full-time career. The growth happened really fast. My first month was honestly mind-blowing, and by the second month, I realised this was something real that I needed to fully focus on. Eventually, everyone at my dental job found out, and I ended up getting fired.

When I first started on OnlyFans, I was only posting bikini and lingerie content. There was no nudity at all in the beginning. Over time, my content naturally evolved month by month into more suggestive content, and years later, I eventually released my first boy-girl video.

Across all my platforms, I have around 9 million social media followers total – 4.5 million on Instagram, over a million on TikTok, and another 1 million on Twitter. Building that audience has taken years of consistency and hard work. I’m making roughly over $1 million dollars a month right now, which still feels surreal to say out loud. But I’ve worked incredibly hard to build this business and make it successful.

One of the biggest misconceptions is that this job is somehow easier than a traditional 9-to-5. In reality, I work constantly – holidays, birthdays, weekends, all of it. When you run your own business and want to succeed at a high level, you’re always ‘on.’

Advertisement

Another misconception is that success on OnlyFans only comes from doing extreme or outrageous content. I completely disagree with that. I’m one of the top creators on the platform, and I’ve built my business by creating content I’m personally comfortable making. If your audience connects with what you create, you can absolutely be successful without constantly pushing boundaries.

As for Euphoria, I actually think it’s great publicity when mainstream shows reference OnlyFans because it opens the door for people to better understand how the platform works. Of course, some portrayals are exaggerated or unrealistic, but overall I think it helps normalise conversations around creators and online work.” ― Skylar Maye

Jessica Barton: “You go from 9-to-5 to 24/7.”

"Content creation is no joke, and it kind of sucks that it’s hard for normal people to understand that, but you go from 9-5 to 24/7," Jessica Barton said.
“Content creation is no joke, and it kind of sucks that it’s hard for normal people to understand that, but you go from 9-5 to 24/7,” Jessica Barton said.

“I was working in a strip club during Covid and we immediately shut down, so I had to pivot. Who knew that pivot would change my life forever? I started off more Playboy style: very clean and basic but sensual and sexy. Legs closed.

Then I have gotten more sexually comfortable with myself and exploring new things, so my levels have increased to toy play, but I keep things solo. I have 550,000 subscribers, and I make about $175,000 to $225,000 a month. A bit over $2 million a year.

Advertisement

Content creation is no joke, and it kind of sucks that it’s hard for normal people to understand that, but you go from 9-to-5 to 24/7. We never sleep. We never stop, and we are always hunting for the next creative idea, which can also be draining.

I think that people never understand the business side of it [and think] you can just do this for fun or quick money. That’s not how it works, and you will not succeed, and this will be all over the internet forever. You dive in headfirst, or don’t dive at all. It can be life-changing in both ways, good and bad.” Jessica Barton

Jade Vow: “I jumped straight in at the deep end and started filming content with my partner.”

"I don’t shy away from showing as much personality as possible, and I pride myself on my content feeling relatable and authentic," said Jade Vow, who creates content with her boyfriend.

Photo courtesy of Jade Vow

“I don’t shy away from showing as much personality as possible, and I pride myself on my content feeling relatable and authentic,” said Jade Vow, who creates content with her boyfriend.

“In 2018, I jumped straight in at the deep end and started filming content with my partner Josh. The majority of my content is filmed in a super amateur style, leaving in all of the awkward and funny moments. I don’t shy away from showing as much personality as possible, and I pride myself on my content feeling relatable and authentic.

Advertisement

Over the years, I’ve managed to curate a strong brand and build a loyal following, so now I have a steady income and a relatively chilled workflow, but it took a lot of hard work and consistency to get here. On OnlyFans alone, I tend to make anywhere between $10,000 to $40,000 per month. It varies a lot. There are also other platforms where I make a few thousand a month as well – it all adds up.

I’ve worked 9-to-5s where I’d come home and collapse out of exhaustion at the end of the day, so I know how hard it can be. But there are times where I actually miss that. And it can also be quite challenging knowing that your entire income could change overnight and be completely out of your control if an account gets deleted or if a rule changes. It was only a few years ago that OnlyFans themselves said they were banning adult content on their platform altogether. Scary times. Luckily, they quickly backtracked on that, but these are the kinds of life-changing decisions that are out of our control.

[Before], if someone asked what you did for a living and you said ‘OnlyFans’ or ‘amateur porn,’ people were shocked, curious and entertained. Nowadays, if you tell someone what you do, it’s more like, ‘Ah yeah, so does my aunt.’

– Jade Vow

Advertisement

I’m not keen on the Euphoria plot line. Firstly – and this is a little selfish – but I like sex work feeling taboo. Before lockdown, when so many new people joined and it became more well-known, if someone asked what you did for a living and you said ‘OnlyFans’ or ‘amateur porn,’ people were shocked, curious and entertained. Nowadays, if you tell someone what you do, it’s more like, ‘Ah yeah, so does my aunt.’ It’s not a dirty little secret anymore – it’s mainstream – and as someone who got into the industry because they have a true love for the naughty things in life, that takes away a bit of the appeal.

Secondly, popular non-sex-worker-run shows tend to paint OnlyFans in a bad, or at least inaccurate, light. Wearing a diaper and dressing up as a baby, as Cassie does, is massively against the rules, for example. There are already so many negative opinions surrounding sex work – we don’t need shows like Euphoria creating new harmful stereotypes and damaging opinions of the industry even more.” ― Jade Vow

Majesty Nasty: “Sex work has taught me how to fully live in my truth.”

"My fans honestly love my personality and humor. I have fans who ask me to do story times, and then I have fans who just want me to just exist," said Majesty Nasty.

Photo courtesy of Majesty Nasty

My fans honestly love my personality and humor. I have fans who ask me to do story times, and then I have fans who just want me to just exist,” said Majesty Nasty.

“I got into OnlyFans when I was about to be engaged but I didn’t know my partner had already exposed our home videos to the world. I decided not to be sad but just embrace it. When I decided to join, Covid had just hit and I was tired of working three jobs. I was working at a club bartending, working as a home aid and I was serving at a restaurant. In 2022 I finally decided to quit all my jobs and do OF full time. I make $200,000 to $400,000 per year, depending on the economy and my energy that year.

Advertisement

When I first started, I was only shooting solos and randomly dropping tapes that me and my ex had together. Once I decided to make it full-time, I started to explore more into women. I decided to finally live in my truth about the love I have for women. My content now is [broader] than it was when I first started.

After actually locking in with it, I felt more open and free. Sex work has taught me how to fully live in my truth. My fans honestly love my personality and humour. I have fans who ask me to do story times, and then I have fans who just want me to just exist. My favourite request I have ever gotten has to be the time I had to do a karaoke video. The fan knew I liked to sing, so he just wanted to see me happy. Sex work has helped me be able to finally feel liberated about my body. As someone who has dealt with sexual assault, it has helped me gain my feeling of power.

But I hate the way TV depicts sex workers, because they make it seem like we’re just girls who were fucked up and decided, ‘let me do porn.’ With Euphoria, I feel like some points in the show were valid, but it doesn’t depict the industry as a whole. I am a Black woman in this industry, so I get treated a different way than others. On the show, Cassie was praised by the internet and people love her, but I don’t get that love fully. I get mainly hate, with a few dashes of love. I’m labeled as a whore, whereas if you’re white, it’s labelled as liberating. ” ― Majesty Nasty

Holly Johnston: “I was excommunicated from the Mormon church” because of OnlyFans.

Advertisement

“I started OnlyFans in the summer of 2021 after my husband passed away. I was trying to support three kids on a middle-income salary while working in HR hiring nurses, and I was drowning in medical bills my husband had acquired before he passed. I also wanted to be present for my kids and be there when they got home from school. One day I was sitting on the couch watching TV when I saw a news segment about another OnlyFans model. The media highlighted how much money she was making, and she was around my age. I thought, ‘That could be me.’ At the time, I didn’t even know what OnlyFans was, but I immediately started researching, building social media accounts, creating a business plan, and launched a few months later.

My first month was good, and within a few months, things were going so well that I quit my job. With content, I started slow. At first, it was more Playboy-style content and tease videos, but over time, it evolved into full adult content. That transition was more about business strategy than comfort. During my first year, I was making over $50,000 a month, and by the next year, I had reached seven figures. This was not luck. It was hard work. And I was excommunicated from the Mormon church, which I grew up in, after I was outed as an OnlyFans creator. But you couldn’t pay me any amount of money to go back to working for someone else.

Today I have over 4 million followers across multiple social media platforms, and it took about two years to build that audience. That growth came from consistency and work ethic. I posted four times a day across platforms, constantly created content, engaged with followers, studied algorithms and built relationships online. Most people think the money comes from OnlyFans itself, but the reality is that the majority of the work happens outside the platform through marketing, social media strategy, content creation, editing, messaging and behind-the-scenes admin work. I regularly work 80-hour weeks.” ― Holly Johnston

Kit Barrus: “If it was so easy, the average girl on OnlyFans wouldn’t be making like $200 a month.”

Advertisement
"I make anywhere between $250,000 to $360,000 a month, depending on the month, and I have made that for the last six months or so," said Kit Barrus.
“I make anywhere between $250,000 to $360,000 a month, depending on the month, and I have made that for the last six months or so,” said Kit Barrus.

“In early 2022, I was unable to really pay my bills at the time working as a personal trainer and going to school, so I made an OnlyFans to make ends meet. I have now left the traditional job market to do OnlyFans exclusively, although I did choose to finish my degrees.

I started off immediately making vanilla content. It was really just me masturbating and interacting with my audience and with the camera. I was really good at talking, so I did a lot of JOIs [jerk off instructions] and just really worked on interfacing and creating this rapport with my audience, so it was a lot of talking, a lot of storytelling, that kind of thing. My content has evolved, it now includes other people, although I’ve maintained that theme of storytelling and trying to really talk and establish some intimacy with the audience, but nowadays I offer girl-girl, boy-girl, fantasy, funny stuff, role playing, like all kinds of different things.

I make anywhere between $250,000 to $360,000 a month, depending on the month, and I have made that for the last six months or so. Doing this is definitely easier for me than a standard job, but it’s… I wouldn’t say that it would be easier for most people. I have really bad ADHD, so this kind of job allows me to hyperfixate, but then back off a little bit. It’s constantly changing, constantly evolving, and that fits in with my brain and how my brain works.

But I think that, like, for most normal people, they’d find it very stressful and they would find it very difficult to establish any kind of rhythm or consistency. If it was so easy, more people would be doing it and the average girl on OnlyFans wouldn’t be making like $200 a month. If it were so easy, everybody on OnlyFans would be making thousands and thousands of dollars, but that’s just not the case. I’ve met girls who are grinding, grinding, grinding and not necessarily making very much money.” ― Kit Barrus

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

David Lammy denies police are ‘institutionally racist’

Published

on

David Lammy and Laura Kuenssberg

David Lammy and Laura Kuenssberg

Speaking to Laura Kuenssberg, David Lammy has denied that the police are institutionally racist. In doing so, he referenced the Casey Report — a report which found evidence of institutional racism in 2023. Lammy claimed the force has moved on since then, which is surprising to hear, because the Met refused to accept the findings of the report:

Advertisement

David Lammy — Left in the past

Justice secretary and deputy PM David Lammy was speaking to Laura Kuenssberg, who asked him:

Do you think that the police are institutionally racist?

Lammy responded:

I actually think we’ve moved on from that period of institutional racism that was very real in the Stephen Lawrence era. That’s not my experience when I see policing. Of course, there are problems. But as a result of the work that Louise Casey did a few years ago, I do, I have seen seen a response from the police here in London.

Because this was within her world view, Kuenssberg accepted this response, and asked Lammy to be even clearer in his agreement with her:

And so the problem is not of the scale that it used to be. And that phrase “institutionally racist” shouldn’t, in your view then, be applied to 2026?

Lammy responded:

Advertisement

I don’t personally recognise that as the appropriate description today.

So, what did the Casey review actually find?

The Casey Report

This is what Maryam Jameela wrote for the Canary when the Casey Report was released:

A review into the Metropolitan police has found the force to be institutionally racist, sexist and homophobic. The report, written by government official Louise Casey, was commissioned after serving Met police officer Wayne Couzens was charged with the kidnap, rape, and murder of Sarah Everard. Since then another officer, David Carrick, has also been jailed for life for dozens of rapes and sexual assaults stretching back two decades. Furthermore, many other Met scandals have emerged.

Without hinting at how bad things were a mere three years ago, Lammy suggested that the Met have now rid themselves of their many prejudices – prejudices which have tainted them for decades. Contrary to this opinion, our own recent reporting has covered:

Additionally, as Rachel Charlton-Dailey reported for the Canary:

There’s also the fact that the police are already massively biased towards disabled people within the Met. In the Casey review, it was found that 33 per cent of staff with a disability or long-term illness had been bullied by other officers. The report stated

disability discrimination is the most frequent claim type brought against the Met. But there is no willingness to learn from these cases.

Unasked questions

The evidence we have suggests UK police forces are still institutionally racist, sexist, ableist, and more. And this evidence doesn’t go away because Nigel Farage found a single case which might suggest an anti-white bias (if you ignore the actual details).

Advertisement

If Kuenssberg was a competent interviewer, she would have drawn attention to the continuing allegations of institutional bigotry that the police attract (particularly the Met). Because she isn’t — or because Lammy’s answer supported her worldview – these points went unmade.

Featured image via BBC

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Sarah Michelle Gellar Remembers Buffy Co-Star Anthony Head In Instagram Tribute

Published

on

David Boreanaz, Anthony Head, Seth Green, Alyson Hannigan, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Nicholas Brendon and Charisma Carpenter pictured on the set of Buffy in the late 1990s

Buffy the Vampire Slayer actor Sarah Michelle Gellar has paid her respects to her former co-star Anthony Head in a touching tribute.

Shortly after the news broke on Friday that Anthony had died at the age of 72, Sarah Michelle, who worked with him on Buffy for many years, took to Instagram to publish a bittersweet post.

Quoting the show’s heartbreaking season five finale, in which Buffy gives a tear-jerking monologue about why she had decided to sacrifice her own life to save her sister Dawn and the world, the post began: ”Tell Giles I figured it out and I’m OK.”

Giles, Anthony’s character in the show, was Buffy’s “Watcher” or mentor on all things slaying, before eventually becoming the titular character’s father figure over the course of the series.

Advertisement

She continued: “Well I don’t have it figured out and I’m not OK.”

“But I know I’m the lucky one because I knew you,” Sarah Michelle wrote, before giving a shout-out to Anthony’s daughters, Daisy and Emily.

“Thank you to Daisy and Emily who not only shared their dad with me, but with the world.”

David Boreanaz, Anthony Head, Seth Green, Alyson Hannigan, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Nicholas Brendon and Charisma Carpenter pictured on the set of Buffy in the late 1990s
David Boreanaz, Anthony Head, Seth Green, Alyson Hannigan, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Nicholas Brendon and Charisma Carpenter pictured on the set of Buffy in the late 1990s

Getty Images via Getty Images

rah Sarah Michelle’s post included a slideshow of backstage photos of herself and Anthony.

Advertisement

The last slide showed screenshots from an exchange Buffy had with Giles in the season two episode Lie To Me, in which a character Buffy thought was a childhood friend ended up double-crossing her in an attempt to become a vampire.

After Buffy realised she’d been conned by her friend, she turned to Giles for some guidance and comfort.

“Does it ever get easy, life?” Buffy asked Giles, to which he responded: “What do you want me to say?”

“Lie to me,” Buffy then said, prompting Giles to tell her: ”Yes, it’s terribly simple. The good guys are always stalwart and true. The bad guys are easily distinguished by their pointy horns or black hats.

Advertisement

“And, uh, we always defeat them and save the day. No one ever dies and… everybody lives happily ever after.”

Outside of Buffy, Anthony made quite an impact on the small screen, especially here in the UK.

The British actor was well known for playing Rupert Mannion, the smarmy former owner of A.F.C. Richmond, in Ted Lasso, in addition to roles in Little Britain, Merlin and an iconic string of Nescafé ads that aired in the 1980s.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Met police suggest Number 10 lied about Mandelson emails

Published

on

Keir Starmer and Met Police officers - Mandelson

Keir Starmer and Met Police officers - Mandelson

The latest batch of Peter Mandelson’s emails proved to be less explosive than expected. While they certainly told us more about what we already knew, they didn’t tell us much else. This is why the real controversy ended up being what wasn’t there.

Downing Street would later claim the Met asked the government to hold back certain messages. Now, the Met have disputed this claim.

Mandelson — Missing messages

The above post from Dan Hodges reads:

* Downing Street briefed journalists the messages relating to the 5 September reshuffle had been withheld at the request of the Metropolitan Police. But today the Met have told the Mail on Sunday this is untrue, and they did not ask for the messages to be held back

* Two of the unpublished messages from Mandelson to McSweeney reportedly relate to Darren Jones and Peter Kyle. Both of them were subsequently promoted in that reshuffle

As Jody McIntyre reported for the Canary:

Advertisement

Despite his “stolen phone” account, McSweeney had stated when questioned by the Foreign Affairs Select Committee on April 28th that text messages he had received from Mandelson would be included in the files. In one newly-released exchange, Mandelson confirms that he is talking to McSweeney “a lot”, but further detail of their correspondence is notably missing.

In other words, it looks like we’re witnessing a cover up of a cover up.

Of the missing messages, there is some hope we might see them. With other messages, though, they’re seemingly gone for good.

As we also learned this week, Starmer had his phone set to routinely delete messages. According to him, this was within guidelines. We can’t confirm this, of course, because the messages no longer exist to check – demonstrating why deleting messages should be illegal for government ministers.

Palantir

Hodges also reported:

Advertisement

* On 27 February Mandelson accompanied Keir Starmer to a meeting at the Washington offices of Palantir. No minutes were kept of the meeting, and it was not included in Starmer’s official schedule. The Mail on Sunday has learnt that a week after Starmer returned from Washington Cabinet Ministers received an instruction from No.10 to meet with Palantir representatives.

The latest Mandelson emails provided further evidence that Mandelson was working to connect his former client Palantir to his then-boss Keir Starmer. The UK has awarded Palantir NHS contracts despite it being a controversial defence and spyware contractor with links to a genocide. It continues to win other contracts too, as Joe Glenton reported for the Canary on 5 June:

This time the genocide-linked company’s software will manage guns, explosives, and even poisons held by the British state. The news comes as the UK’s tech committee urged the government to pull the plug on Palantir’s takeover of vast areas of UK infrastructure.

Missing inaction

As Hodges also asked:

Very simple question that now needs to be answered. Downing Street have claimed the Mandelson/McSweeney messages were withheld at the request of the Metropolitan Police. The Met say this isn’t true. So who’s lying. And why haven’t the messages been published.

Given that both the Met and Starmer are notoriously dishonest, this may not be an easy question to answer.

Featured image via WPA Pool (Getty Images) / Leon Neal (Getty Images)

Advertisement

By Willem Moore

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Digital ID will spell the death of the individual

Published

on

Labour is manufacturing consent for digital ID

Beyond the immediate political drama surrounding prime minister Keir Starmer’s future, a far more unsettling development in the British state is quietly gathering pace. The King’s Speech last month confirmed that Labour intends to press ahead with digital ID.

The concept of a digital ID has been lurking in the background of British politics ever since physical ID cards were first pitched by the Blair government in the mid-2000s. Voters hated the idea, and it was one of the first things ditched by David Cameron’s Tory-Lib Dem coalition in 2010. Yet Starmer, following in the footsteps of his New Labour technocratic forebears, has resuscitated the deeply unpopular policy under the new title of ‘BritCard’.

Digital ID is in many ways the essence of Starmerism, and the misguided belief that the state can manage away the country’s myriad problems by bureaucratic means. It speaks to a philosophy that views the population not as citizens with inherent rights, but as passive datasets to be administered. As the recent introduction of the government’s ‘UK Wallet’ app shows, the British public is also being encircled by an encroaching system of state surveillance by more means than digital ID.

Advertisement

Ministers have naturally sought to assuage public fears regarding digital ID by framing its introduction as a matter of administrative efficiency and even a means of reducing illegal immigration. But the reality is far more ominous: if introduced, it will herald the inversion of our entire legal tradition. In Britain, the individual has historically been free to act unless expressly forbidden. Under an expanding digital ID regime, however, this will be turned on its head. The long-term implication of this policy is a society where some form of digital approval is a prerequisite for healthcare, housing and employment – and where an opaque algorithm could effectively flag or delete a ‘user’ from the British economy. We will become a ‘papers, please’ society for the first time in our history.

This creeping authoritarianism is already clear in other areas of society. Across the UK, police forces are now routinely using biometric cameras to scan passers-by in real time – and erroneously arresting individuals as part of the process. Such surveillance has never been subjected to a parliamentary mandate.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

While the government presents digital ID as a necessary step for security, centralising the personal data of the entire population is fraught with risk. It creates a valuable target for criminals and foreign intelligence services. It is baffling that, instead of mitigating exposure through decentralisation, Labour seems intent on building something that bad actors will inevitably hack or leak.

These external risks, though, pale in comparison to the expansion of state oversight and control it represents. Government departments are wittingly or inadvertently creating a system where those who cannot, or will not, engage with the digital state are relegated to a second-class existence. The setup would allow for a level of social control previously unthinkable. And all of it would be done by a series of unnoticed, incremental software updates.

Advertisement

With the architecture for such a system now formally in play, MPs and peers have an opportunity to stand with the public in opposition and to reassert the role of parliament as a vital check on executive overreach.

Having missed previous opportunities to curtail the scaling of a ‘Big Brother’ state, members of both houses should put aside their party differences and come together to insist on red lines regarding surveillance architecture. This could be achieved through coordinated amendments to legislation, alongside the introduction of separate, standalone bills that provide definitive vetoes on the use of such technology.

There is also a case to be made for a statutory ‘right to be anonymous’ in public spaces. This would legally define the biometric signature of the face as a private asset, and ensure that it cannot be used without explicit, individual consent. It would also mean greater checks and full transparency on the deepening integration of Big Tech into the NHS, Home Office and other government departments. Among the most important considerations must be a legal guarantee that no citizen can be denied essential services for choosing to remain ‘offline’.  

Advertisement

Without a decisive intervention, the UK risks drifting into a digital panopticon where liberty ceases to be an inherent right and instead becomes a conditional privilege granted by the state. The British constitutional tradition, which is defined by the hard-won freedom of the individual, should serve as a guiding star for both houses in the coming period.

David Yorath is a communications professional and a former advisor to a Member of Parliament.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Best Strength Training For Longevity: How Many Minutes A Week Should You Lift?

Published

on

Best Strength Training For Longevity: How Many Minutes A Week Should You Lift?

Strength training has so many benefits, it’s hard to keep count. It’s been linked to up to four years of extra life, can help to protect us from falls as we age, may reduce dementia risk, and could maintain your bone health… the list goes on.

A new paper published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine has added clarifying details for those hoping to see the most benefits from the activity.

After 30 years of follow-up from 147,374 participants, they found the optimum amount of lifting and resistance training per week for longevity.

How much strength training should I do per week?

Advertisement

This research found that the lowest risk of all-cause mortality was linked to one to two hours (60-119 minutes) of resistance training, especially if it was done alongside aerobic training.

The benefits of strength training seemed to “plateau” at two hours a week in this study, meanwhile.

Speaking to HuffPost UK previously, Dr Suzanne Wylie, GP and medical adviser for IQdoctor, said: “I would generally advise at least two sessions of strength training per week, focusing on all the major muscle groups”.

How much of a difference does one to two hours a week of strength training make?

Advertisement
  • 60-120 minutes of strength training a week was linked to 13% lower all-cause mortality risk,
  • The risk of death from cardiovascular disease, like heart attack or stroke, was 19% lower,
  • The risk of death from dementia was 27% lower,
  • The risk of all-cause mortality was 58% lower when 90-120 minutes of strength training was combined with a high level of aerobic activity (30-45 hours a week).

What counts as resistance or strength training?

You don’t always need weights to do strength training.

Dr Wylie formerly told us that strength training “might include bodyweight exercises like squats, push-ups, or step-ups, or using resistance bands or weights at home or in the gym”.

The point is that your muscles work against a form of resistance, be that a dumbbell or your own weight.

She added, “The emphasis should be on steady, safe progression rather than attempting heavy lifts immediately”.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The women who could make or break MAGA

Published

on

Voices like Isabel Brown or Riley Gaines have become emblems of the Turning Point faction of Gen-Z and millennials.

Among the sweeping tent of President Donald Trump’s winning coalition in 2024, there’s a niche that’s often overlooked despite the potency of its role in the burgeoning young right: conservative women.

It’s these women, like Christian conservative influencer Savanna Faith Stone, who say “we’re not really identifying with the MAGA party anymore.”

“Promises that were made have not been delivered on at all, and I think young women are realizing that,” Stone said in an interview with POLITICO. “They’re realizing, ‘Hey, you promised lower gas prices. You promised the economy would be better. Like, that’s why we voted for you.’”

Stone, who turns 21 this week, is one of a flurry of influencers who flocked to San Antonio this weekend, young families in tow, to gather under a bevy of bright pink lights at Turning Point USA’s Women’s Leadership Summit. It’s the biggest gathering of its kind for the young female right — a space for a collective disdain for “woke” culture, a love for God and kinship under the theme of “faith, family and freedom.”

Advertisement

But bubbling under the surface are divisions within the GOP that have enveloped the online voices of the young right and a budding disillusionment among young women with the politics of the second Trump administration. It’s all part of a growing divide between being “MAGA” in 2026 and being “America First.”

Trump is “not America first,” Stone said. She voted for a president who promised no new wars, who was pro-family and would bring down costs. “It’s harder than ever for a young couple to be able to buy a home,” she added.

Young women moved from 33 percent for Trump in 2020 to 40 percent in 2024, while recent polling has shown the partisan gender divide is more stark than ever. Now less than six months out from the midterms, the young female right’s biggest voices are warning women could sit out the midterm elections.

“I cannot express to you the level of alarm bells that should be ringing for the GOP,” as women consider not voting, conservative influencer Alex Clark told POLITICO, adding that young women are looking at everything from the ongoing war in Iran to the persistence of pesticides and it’s breaking their trust.

Advertisement

Clark is a Turning Point darling, a 33 year-old podcaster with half a million followers who grew under the tutelage of the late Charlie Kirk. She’s built a MAHA-focused health and wellness platform that she calls an “unaggressive way to share conservative ideals” with a loyal following. (“You’re trailing my show!” she recalled Kirk telling her in 2024. “Yeah, you better watch out!” she responded.)

She hasn’t shied away from sharing her criticism of the administration. “I straight up told [the White House], ‘People want ‘fight, fight, fight Trump.’ They don’t want ‘ballroom Trump,’’” Clark said. “I feel like some of the magic and the spark that helped us win 2024 is missing.”

Voices like Isabel Brown or Riley Gaines have become emblems of the Turning Point faction of Gen-Z and millennials.

Along with other voices like Isabel Brown or Riley Gaines, they’ve become emblems of the Turning Point faction of Gen-Z and millennials. They believe women’s biology will push them to follow strong men — part of what they credit for some young women’s embrace of the GOP in 2024 as the party penetrated the manosphere. Stone drew controversy for saying voting should be one vote per household. Clark told POLITICO she doesn’t think a woman should be president.

But the universe of female influencers is vast and oftentimes at odds. Raquel DeBono, the self-proclaimed NYC conservative of “Make America Hot Again” fame, said in an interview that she “would not be caught dead” at Turning Point’s summit and rejects the rigidity of the online faction that has cast out figures like Megyn Kelly. “If you want to let women into the tent and you want more women to vote conservative, you need to be less cringe and horrible,” DeBono said.

Advertisement

And then there’s influencers like Emily Wilson, of “Emily Saves America,” and Priya Patel, conservatives living in West Hollywood who embrace traditional values but often find an audience in women who don’t. “I read my Bible. I want to get married young. I’m saving myself for marriage,” Patel said. But the pair who co-host “Pretty Political” have followers that are “girls that do Only Fans, makeup artists, graffiti artists” who all “love America,” Wilson said.

Whether city conservatives or Turning Point young moms, they agree on key issues — including around foreign policy or accountability for the Jeffrey Epstein files — that they say are diverting them from MAGA or the White House. And with young voters already a turnout challenge in midterm years, they’re all concerned many young conservative women simply won’t show up come November.

The White House, in response to a request for comment, touted the “most pro-woman agenda in American history” — pointing to women’s sports, decreasing violent crime, expanding the child tax credit and cutting food dyes, as well as “creating the most renter-friendly market we’ve seen in years,” in a statement from spokesperson Anna Kelly.

The administration, Kelly says, has “achieved win after win on issues women care about most — and we’re just getting started. The MAGA coalition is stronger than ever, and women continue to play a powerful role in the movement.”

Advertisement

But GOP women politicians know it’s “100,000 percent” a problem. “It’s something that I have spoken to the White House about, ” Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) — who co-chairs the Republican Women’s Caucus — said in an interview. She added the GOP has to be “laser focused” on delivering on affordability, “and if we don’t, we’re failing at earning their trust and support in the election.”

And the Republican Party made the mistake before of not messaging directly to women, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders told POLITICO. “Women want a lot of those same things. We want safe neighborhoods. We want the opportunity to make decisions about how we raise our families,” she said.

Yet there’s skepticism about whether the GOP will take these concerns seriously, Marjorie Taylor Greene, the former congresswoman who appeared with Turning Point more than once, texted. “I think about all the single mothers and women out there trying to make it, and it is extremely difficult, with inflation continuing to rise and overall cost of living continuing to rise,” she said. She also called Trump’s tone and language “a major turn off to women.”

These young conservative women — some clad in florals, others still donning their ruby-red Trump hats — don’t regret their vote, and many expressed a desire for the administration to succeed.

Advertisement

But any future for the growth of the budding female right has a bridge of trust to re-build.

“After Trump in 2028, if we want to see this energy continue that we had in 2015 and 2024, if we want that to have any sort of life after 2028 — it has to become an America First movement,” Clark told Playbook. “That is the cry of the base right now.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Foods To Avoid Eating Before Anal Sex

Published

on

There’s no reason to stigmatize a perfectly normal part of your body and a perfectly normal way to give and receive pleasure. But you can set yourself up for minimal discomfort by learning what sits better in your body before you play.

If anal sex is on the menu tonight, you might be worried about what you ate beforehand. After all, if letting one rip embarrasses you in yoga class, then getting intimate with a partner can feel even more anxiety-inducing.

Maybe you’re wondering whether that chili and beans for dinner was a terrible idea before a roll in the hay.

And while certain foods can make things a little less comfortable – like, say, chili and beans – experts say there’s also a huge misconception around the idea of being “perfectly prepared” for anal sex.

“There’s this idea that you can be perfectly clean for anal play, but the anus is where poop exits the body,” Javay Frye-Nekrasova, a sex educator at We-Vibe, tells HuffPost. “Mess is to be expected, regardless of how you prepare, because we are human, and that’s life. And that’s OK!”

Advertisement

She adds, “Trust me, even as a sex educator I still have instances where the realities of a booty happen.”

In other words, you don’t need to obsessively restrict food or try to achieve some impossible standard of being ready “back there”.

“The rectum, the part of the body involved in most anal play, is not a storage chamber. For most people, most of the time, it’s actually empty,” Dr. Jenni Skyler, a sex therapist, says. “Stool is stored higher up, in the colon, and only moves down when your body is preparing to have a bowel movement.”

There’s no reason to stigmatize a perfectly normal part of your body and a perfectly normal way to give and receive pleasure. But you can set yourself up for minimal discomfort by learning what sits better in your body before you play.

LSOphoto via Getty Images

There’s no reason to stigmatize a perfectly normal part of your body and a perfectly normal way to give and receive pleasure. But you can set yourself up for minimal discomfort by learning what sits better in your body before you play.

“This is good news,” she continues. “It means that with reasonable preparation, anal play is far less messy than most people fear.”

Advertisement

Still, certain foods can increase bloating, gas, digestive urgency or discomfort, which can make people feel less relaxed and confident during anal play.

Here are the foods experts say are best to avoid before anal sex – and a few suggestions of what to eat instead.

Very spicy foods

According to Skyler, spicy foods can irritate the digestive tract and speed up digestion, which may lead to looser or more unpredictable bowel movements.

Advertisement

“Spicy foods are not fully broken down during digestion,” she says. “They irritate the digestive tract on the way in and out.”

Registered dietitian Kristen Kuminski adds that capsaicin – the compound responsible for heat in spicy foods – “passes through the digestive tract and causes irritation on the way out.”

If you already know spicy foods tend to upset your stomach, experts say the hours before anal play probably aren’t the time to test your limits with hot wings or extra chili oil.

Greasy or fried foods

Advertisement

Heavy, oily foods can sit heavily in the stomach and may contribute to bloating, sluggishness and loose stool.

“Being ‘stuffed’ – pun intended – only makes it more uncomfortable,” Frye-Nekrasova says.

Skyler adds that greasy foods are harder to digest overall, which can make people feel “sluggish and bloated – the opposite of relaxed.”

Gas-causing foods

Advertisement

Beans, lentils, broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts and onions are all healthy foods, but they can also increase gas production.

Kuminski says high-fibre foods eaten in large amounts right before anal sex are some of the biggest offenders when it comes to bloating and digestive discomfort.

Skyler stresses that passing gas is completely normal and nothing to be ashamed of, especially when it happens in the bedroom. But if someone is already anxious about anal sex, feeling bloated or gassy can make it harder to relax and stay present.

“These foods are great,” she says. “Just maybe not at lunch on the day of.”

Advertisement
Some of your favorite foods might not set you up for success for anal play later in the evening.
Some of your favorite foods might not set you up for success for anal play later in the evening.

Dairy (if you’re sensitive to it)

Even mild lactose intolerance can trigger bloating, gas or digestive upset.

“If you know dairy sometimes disagrees with you, the hours before anal play are a good time to skip the cheese plate and the ice cream,” Skyler says.

Kuminski notes that even mild lactose sensitivity can lead to “bloating and urgency that is badly timed”.

Artificial sweeteners

Advertisement

Sugar alcohols like sorbitol, xylitol, erythritol and mannitol – commonly found in sugar-free gum, protein bars and “diet” snacks – are well known for causing bloating and digestive distress.

“This one surprises people,” Skyler says, noting they can sometimes trigger loose stool “quite dramatically”.

Excess alcohol

Sure, that bottle of wine at dinner might have loosened your inhibitions, but that’s not the only thing it loosened. Alcohol can irritate the digestive tract, while also loosening stool and contributing to dehydration.

Advertisement

But Skyler says there’s another concern, too: drinking heavily can make it harder for people to stay aware of discomfort or pain during anal sex.

“In large amounts we struggle to be present and can override our pain receptors,” she says.

Kuminski similarly notes that alcohol “loosens inhibitions but also loosens gut motility,” which can create unpredictable bowel behaviour.

Huge meals before sex

Advertisement

Even if you haven’t eaten any of the foods above, experts say timing still matters. “A huge meal eaten right before play can trigger the urge for a bowel movement at an inconvenient time,” Skyler says.

Kuminski recommends giving yourself three to four hours after a meal before anal play, adding that “timing matters as much as what you eat.”

So what should you eat?

Experts generally recommend sticking to foods that support predictable digestion and well-formed bowel movements.

Advertisement
  • soluble fibre
  • lean proteins
  • cooked vegetables
  • bananas
  • lots of water

Kuminski also suggests low-fibre, easy-to-digest foods in the hours beforehand, including:

  • white rice
  • eggs
  • plain chicken
  • bananas

“It’s basically the same logic as eating before a long run or race where you don’t want any GI surprises,” she explains.

But Frye-Nekrasova says people shouldn’t become obsessive or restrictive around food before sex.

Instead, she recommends simply paying attention to your own digestion and giving yourself enough time between eating and anal play.

“A good rule of thumb I follow is to try to stop eating at least three hours before planned anal play,” she says. “Just to give my body enough time to digest food so I can have a bowel movement beforehand.”

Everyone’s body is different when it comes to food, digestion and comfort during sex — and, ultimately, learning how to listen to your body and communicate with your partner(s) is key to having a good time.

Artem Peretiatko via Getty Images

Everyone’s body is different when it comes to food, digestion and comfort during sex — and, ultimately, learning how to listen to your body and communicate with your partner(s) is key to having a good time.

She adds that everyone’s digestion works differently, so there’s no perfect formula.

Advertisement

“If you are more regular with your digestion and bowel movements, shorter timeframes could absolutely work for you,” she says.

Rather than stressing over eating “perfectly,” Frye-Nekrasova suggests planning ahead in realistic ways – especially on date nights involving heavier meals.

“If you’re going to dinner and it’s going to be something heavier, then planning an activity afterward to give yourself enough time to digest the food before sex would be a good move,” she says.

Most importantly, she stresses that relaxation and communication matter more than perfection.

Advertisement

“Bodies are weird,” Frye-Nekrasova says. “I know that being told to relax doesn’t actually help anyone relax, but I do want to say it because being relaxed helps our bodies function in the typical, expected way (aka digestion and bowel movements) a lot easier than if we are stressed.”

Frye-Nekrasova adds, “And stressing about being perfectly prepared is actually the opposite of what helps people relax.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Teens Using AI Chatbots For Mental Health Advice Is Alarming

Published

on

The author speaking at a New York City Council convening for youth mental health, discussing technology and service provision.

Recently, while hanging out at my friends’ houses, I’ve gotten to listen in as their teens talked about everything from the best new music (who exactly is Yeat?), trending phrases (is 6-7 actually going anywhere?) and their behavioural habits.

Then I asked, for example, where they would go to search for a restaurant recommendation, homework help or advice. The answers to all of these were their friend Chat – as in ChatGPT or similar artificial intelligence chatbots.

Now I knew I was cooked (did I use that right?) years ago when I was still using Google for answers the teens had moved on to TikTok for, but I didn’t fully appreciate – until these conversations – just how all-consuming the use of Chat was in their everyday lives.

So I was also surprised to find out they are overwhelmingly using Chat as not just a friend, but a mental health provider.

Advertisement

As a clinical psychologist, this hits me especially hard. I’ve worked for years to translate information from my studies and the field of psychology to young people in entertaining and easy to understand ways. I have developed programs that help clinicians to work with families and young people to talk through life’s biggest stressors. But at the end of the day, they’d rather go to a bot that doesn’t really know them as a person, just as a data point.

My friend’s children showed me exactly how quickly this generation, very quick to get, well, anything, wanted relief for symptoms of depression and anxiety. They would tell Chat they weren’t feeling well and want to know what could be done about it – all before breakfast.

They said that they didn’t want to schedule an appointment for later or couldn’t hold their distress for a longer period; they wanted to use something that gave them some support in a literal blink of an eye.

As a millennial, I grew up in the “Microwave Generation,” a group of kids known for their desire for instant gratification and having their needs met instantly. What, then, do we need to do to prepare for a generation that not only gets it instantly, but doesn’t even have to move off the sofa to do so? Their expectation that results would be easy to attain and accurate and personalised runs afoul of our current mental health model.

Advertisement

There have been several hit pieces on (and defaced NYC billboards for) the “Friend” device. An orb that goes around the user’s neck, Friend can give unfettered, curated advice throughout the day, accompanying the user through life’s mundane or noteworthy experiences. Many of us have scoffed at it – myself included – but now that I hear what the young people are saying about wanting support after a decade of declining mental health, is it so far-fetched to imagine that they just want to be quickly heard, seen and validated?

Tech companies have spent considerable time and resources to figure out what keeps young people hooked. But young people’s mental health is at stake – they already see themselves less positively, feel more isolated and have learning gaps relative to generations preceding them. Interactive AI – with its capacity to be responsive to youth – may seem like a clear solution.

Except early research hints at what the headlines already show: Great opportunity for “connection” may also come with great danger through compliance. Young people are also less likely to discuss the advice from Chat with loved ones, leading to potentially deadly consequences, such as in cases where teen suicides have been linked to AI chatbots.

The author speaking at a New York City Council convening for youth mental health, discussing technology and service provision.

Photo Courtesy Of Dr. Riana Elyse Anderson

The author speaking at a New York City Council convening for youth mental health, discussing technology and service provision.

These consequences, to say nothing of the known and racial biases of chatbots for Black youth, can lead to greater disparities in mental health outcomes. If Black youth are exposed to high incidents of daily online racism and are engaging in higher rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviours relative to their peers and other times in history, the guidance from internet-culled resources may be dire for that population.

Advertisement

So as adults, we need to think about ways we can support the young people in our lives.

Since Chat, Chatty or any other nickname for the chatbot, is here to stay, how can we learn from what our youth are searching for and be a part of that solution – together? How can we ensure our phones are down long enough for us to actually hear what they are saying? How can we support them knowing that life is in fact filled with ups and downs, not just the most clean or perfect versions of output or editing that we present to the world?

By modelling behaviours that we want to see in them, we can show that it is natural to not know, to ask others, to wrestle with frustration. Show them how you may decide between two choices, or, better yet, use technology to work out a problem together. Use video chat to call someone to talk through a challenging situation so they can hear what conversation skills look, sound and feel like.

Finally, ask them directly about chats with, well, Chat, using questions that open up conversation and invite inquiry and analysis instead of yes or no questions that may close off further discussion.

Advertisement

My hope is that I can intentionally strengthen my relationship with mentees and niblings this year. I might start by asking some simple questions to kick off our discussion: What are the latest songs I should listen to (and will I understand them)? Where did you get those jeans (the back of my storage)? And, most relevant to our conversation here, what are you asking Chat about today?

This latter question may just be the thing that helps one child know they have a friend that is real, all ears and willing to provide steady feedback to life’s tough stuff.

Dr. Riana Elyse Anderson is a licensed clinical and community psychologist, associate professor at Columbia University’s School of Social Work, and affiliate with Harvard’s Hutchins Center for African & African American Research and FXB Center for Health and Human Rights. She is a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project in Partnership with National Black Child Development Institute.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rear-Facing Car Seats Could Save Kids’ Lives In Car Accidents

Published

on

Jenny Everson's car after the collision on a 50mph road.

Parents in the UK are being urged to keep their children rear-facing in car seats until they’re at least four years old.

Rear Face For Safety said children are up to five times safer travelling rear-facing than forward-facing and is trying to raise awareness of this to save lives and prevent life-changing injuries.

Jenny Everson has firsthand experience of the power of rear-facing. She was driving along a 50mph road in December 2023, when a speeding driver crossed through a gap in the central reservation and collided head-on with her car.

Jenny and her mother, who was travelling in the front passenger seat, were both knocked unconscious by the impact and suffered serious injuries which required lengthy rehabilitation in hospital.

Advertisement

But Jenny’s son Marlo, who was almost three at the time and travelling in a rear-facing car seat, escaped with only minor injuries.

Jenny Everson's car after the collision on a 50mph road.
Jenny Everson’s car after the collision on a 50mph road.

“Had it not been for Marlo’s rear-facing seat, I was told by emergency services he likely wouldn’t be here now,” Jenny said.

“I will be forever grateful I did my research as I’m sure his seat saved his life, or at the very least saved him from serious injury.”

She is now on a mission to raise awareness of the importance of rear-facing seats, adding that “if telling our story helps save just one child’s life, then it’s worth it”.

Jenny and her son Marlo

Why is rear-facing safer?

In the UK, it’s a legal requirement for babies under 15 months of age to travel rear-facing. This is because infants’ heads are proportionally heavier than older children’s compared to their bodies, so their necks are more delicate.

Advertisement

According to Halfords, having the car seat in a rear-facing position protects them better in the event of a crash. Yet a 2024 survey by the retailer found nearly a quarter (22%) of parents are breaking the law by having their infant forward-facing.

Some parents switch to forward-facing once their children’s legs become longer or when they become toddlers. But experts want to challenge this view.

They stress that in a frontal collision, rear-facing seats offer enhanced protection for a child’s head, neck and spine by distributing crash forces across the back of the child car seat.

The NHS-run Bedfordshire Luton Children’s Health Service recommends for children to use a rear-facing seat until they’re four years old as they have “less developed skeletons”.

Advertisement

Dr Maria Klingegård, traffic safety researcher at Folksam, said: “Children are not just small adults. They need extra support. A rear-facing child restraint system provides robust protection that is forgiving for misuse, offers synchronised support for the head and torso, and protects the neck.”

She highlighted how Sweden has “among the lowest fatality rates for small children in cars”, which she claimed is “largely because most parents use rear-facing restraints for older children up to four or five years of age, or longer”.

Data suggests around 22% of UK children aged two to four travel rear-facing, compared with 83% in Sweden.

Dr Neale Kinnear, a leading UK behavioural scientist, road safety expert and father-of-two, said: “Many families in the UK remain unaware of the safety benefits or assume that turning children forward-facing earlier is the norm internationally.

Advertisement

“What matters is making sure parents have access to clear, consistent and evidence-based information so they can make informed choices.

“Rear-facing travel is one practical and evidence-informed step that can help better protect children.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025