Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Alison Hammond Denies Strictly Come Dancing And Celebrity Traitors Claims

Published

on

Alison Hammond Denies Strictly Come Dancing And Celebrity Traitors Claims

Alison Hammond has ruled herself out of hosting Strictly Come Dancing, as well as extinguishing hopes of an appearance on Celebrity Traitors.

Alison competed on the show back in 2014, where she was partnered with Aljaz Skorjanec and ultimately became the sixth celebrity to be eliminated the same year Caroline Flack and Pasha Kovalev went on to win the coveted glitterball trophy.

In an interview with Radio Times, Alison revealed she had, indeed, been in talks about stepping into the Strictly presenter role, but that she was unable to take on the mammoth task.

“I have, actually,” she said, responding to whether she’d been approached about the job. “You didn’t expect that answer, did you? I can’t lie, I’m incapable.”

Advertisement

Alison explained that her packed schedule meant she wasn’t able to commit to Strictly, while also ruling herself out of another fan favourite show that she’d previously been rumoured for.

She continued: “I’m so busy, babes, that I’m not sure it’s going to happen. It’s unrealistic. I’m so happy they considered me but, like Traitors, I can’t do it because everything clashes.”

“I would have loved to have done it – anybody that gets it, they’re going to land the perfect job. But I’m so happy with everything I’ve got. What would I drop, to do Strictly?”

Alison was originally reported by tabloids to be undergoing “chemistry tests” for the Strictly role while she also made no secret of her hopes to host the show during an appearance on Loose Women back in December.

Advertisement

“I’m absolutely Claudia – I’m upstairs,” she said, referring to which of the live show’s roles she’d be best suited to.

“Whoever gets that job, what an amazing job to get. It’s the dream job,” she added, before joking that the Strictly presenting gig was made for her. “The BBC don’t know it yet, but it’s going to happen.”

As for who will replace Tess and Claudia, names reportedly still in the running include Zoe Ball, Emma Willis, Angela Scanlon and Johannes Radebe.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

The rampant misogyny of transing Elizabeth I

Published

on

The rampant misogyny of transing Elizabeth I

Appropriately, it was April Fool’s Day when I read that Queen Elizabeth I is to be portrayed as a cross-dressing man in a forthcoming television show. But we live in times when the more silly and outlandish a rumoured cultural or political plan, the more likely it is to be true. Majesty – an oddly ‘heritage’ title for a project that clearly considers itself ‘transgressive’ – is set to film this summer, and is seeking ‘trans actresses’ (what we used to call cross-dressers, before they got really cross) to play the monarch.

The Sun, which first reported it, seemed drearily inclined to go along with the usual sexist claims of the trans lobby. ‘She is known for having traits associated with a male monarch’, it mouthed in a mealy manner in an article last week. What would those be – not getting her tits out for, if not the cameras, then the portrait painters of the era? ‘Some have speculated she had male pseudo-hermaphroditism, known as testicular feminisation’, the Sun continued, also noting that ‘others are obsessed with the Bisley Boy myth’. Yes, ‘obsessed’ isn’t too extreme a word here – I often hear people at bus stops discussing the Bisley Boy myth. This is the claim that Princess Elizabeth died in her youth and was replaced by a local boy with red hair. It was popularised by Bram Stoker in his 1910 book, Famous Imposters – because Bram ‘Dracula’ Stoker never made up far-fetched stories based extremely loosely on real people, did he?

The Sun quoted a ‘TV insider’ who insists: ‘Most historians dismiss the claims as misogyny motivated by the idea no woman could be as strong or capable without actually being a man. But it’s a theory which captures the imagination and appears to answer a lot of other questions around the unique queen.’ 

Advertisement

What would these questions be? That Elizabeth never married and had no children? Must be a bloke, then – what real woman would forego such unqualified pleasures? It’s a sign that trans thought is so woefully conventional, so gender straitjacketed, that it just doesn’t seem able to grasp, in this case, why a woman would refuse to hand over her hard-won power to a man by marrying a stranger who didn’t even speak her language. Or that she said on the eve of the Spanish Armada invasion: ‘I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king’? It’s called wordplay, I believe, and was extremely common until people with Tin Ear Syndrome – a disease affecting the ‘trans community’ and their inordinate number of ‘allies’ – became so prevalent among those in the arts and media.

This, of course, is our old mate ‘Queering the Past’ (or ‘lying’ as those not educated beyond all common sense and honesty know it) beloved of universities, museums and other beclowned institutions. There have been some truly rib-tickling examples of it, such as the claim that ‘trans Vikings’ existed, which sounds like a Monty Python sketch; sometimes the whole circus gets too much even for the most proudly gay public figure. In 2023, the museum dedicated to conserving the Mary Rose hosted a blog, promising to understand the collection of everyday objects found on the 16th-century ship ‘through a queer lens’. This prompted the great Philip Hensher to post on X: ‘I am as keen as anyone on gay sex, but I have to say to these curators – you’re fucking mental.’

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

We can easily mock the kind of mind that can tie itself into the most labyrinthine of sailor’s knots in order to posit the notion of invading ‘trans’ hordes raping their way across countries, presumably using papier-mâché penises, without the poor women of those nations noticing. Who cares about Vikings’ rights anyway? But it’s beyond a joke when real women who lived in (relatively) recent memory – who we know had to fight against monstrous insults and / or oppression – have their remains picked over by academic half-wits, apparently for no greater cause than making inadequate men (befrocked or not) feel better about themselves; Joan of Arc, Rosa Bonheur, Louisa May Alcott, Storme DeLarverie. Some women pretended to be men so they could be doctors, soldiers, pirates – not because they really considered themselves he / hims. The class privilege of those intent on ‘queering’ every female ‘presenting’ as female in history quite understandably prevents them from understanding how earning a living was the reason many women pretended to be men – including, of course, the Brontë sisters, or Currer, Ellis and Acton Bell, as they were known. Or even JK Rowling, whose publishers advised her that boys would not buy books written by someone called Joanne.

Famous women are rare in history. They are generally there because they dared to do what was not expected of them – sometimes on pain of death. Yet somehow, it’s now ‘progressive’ to cancel them out by posthumously changing their sex. It’s especially idiotic in the case of Elizabeth I, who if she had really been born male (and let’s remember that royal births have been witnessed by the courtiers and politicians of the day, a practice which only ended in 1948, prior to the birth of Prince Charles) would not have seen her mother executed, when Elizabeth was still a child. Her father married and murdered multiple times because he couldn’t get a male heir. It’s telling that those who scream most loudly about having their feelings hurt when they’re called Martha instead of Arthur don’t mind trampling all over the graves of women killed by the savage misogyny of the age. Their lack of respect for the dead reminds one of the way rape and murder victims once had their reputations trashed by authorities defending violent males.

Advertisement

A less important but still significant side effect of ‘queering’ or ‘transing’ the past is that this will mean fewer roles for actresses, already at a disadvantage in a profession that throws them on the scrapheap far earlier than men. Shakespeare’s heroines were originally played by teenage boys, as it was considered improper for women to display themselves in such a way. The call for ‘actors who identify as transgender women’, as the casting call for Majesty puts it, means that women can be edged out once more. Over the past few years, the woman-face actors Karla Sofia Gascon, Michaela Jaé Rodriguez and Laverne Cox have been nominated for Academy Awards, Golden Globes, Emmys and BAFTAS in the female categories. Tellingly, there’s been no traffic the other way, with women pretending to be men being put up for male prizes.

When I was a youngster in the 1970s, and Margaret Thatcher first came to notice as a leader of the Tory Party, I remember the sneering from both right and left about her being ‘a man in drag’ and ‘a female impersonator’. I never thought I’d be hearing the same sort of trash talk about powerful women half a century later, as the Elizabeth project so creepily does. Tell you what, queer folx, let’s just explain away every driven, successful woman in history as a man and have done with it; from Don Ciccone and John Crawford in the showbiz world to everyone from Lionel Shriver to me in the writing world. Because women aren’t ambitious and forceful, ever. Talk about erasure!

Julie Burchill is a spiked columnist. Follow her Substack, ‘Notes from the Naughty Step’, here.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Newcastle set for UK and Europe’s first Palestinian memorial

Published

on

Newcastle set for UK and Europe’s first Palestinian memorial

A new memorial for Palestinian civilians could be added to Newcastle’s Peace Garden following a proposal supported by local councillors and community groups.

The Peace Garden, located within the grounds of Newcastle’s Civic Centre, was established as a space for remembrance and reflection for communities affected by war, genocide and violence.

Councillor Habib Rahman has led the new initiative. His work with Newcastle City Council helped create the memorial area.

Two memorials have already been installed in the garden. In 2024, a memorial stone was unveiled in remembrance of the genocide against the Tutsi people of Rwanda, supported by Newcastle’s Rwandan community.

Advertisement

A second memorial was installed in 2025 to recognise the genocide against the Roma people. At the same time, an oak tree was planted to commemorate Jewish refugees and victims of the Srebrenica genocide.

Plans for memorial stone and olive tree

Rahman has now proposed a further memorial stone to honour Palestinian civilians who have lost their lives during the Israel–Gaza conflict. The proposal also includes planting an olive tree as a symbol of remembrance.

The idea was presented to Newcastle city council leader Karen Kilgour and referenced in a cabinet update to full council in March 2026 under future considerations for the Peace Garden.

Council documents state that Rahman is facilitating discussions with the local Palestinian community, to establish a permanent memorial within the Civic Centre grounds.

Advertisement

Council arboriculture specialists are currently considering the most suitable location within the Civic Centre green spaces to plant the olive tree.

The item was not discussed in detail at the March council meeting as the session was dominated by budget discussions. However, Rahman later wrote to the council leader requesting that the proposal be progressed through a council and cabinet decision.

He also confirmed that the full cost of the memorial and tree planting would be covered entirely by the community.

In a letter responding to the proposal, a council officer confirmed formal acceptance of the plan to install a permanent memorial commemorating innocent Palestinian civilians.

Advertisement

Rahman said he was proud of the work that had gone into creating the Peace Garden:

I am immensely proud of the work undertaken to establish the Peace Garden. As a City of Sanctuary, it is fitting that Newcastle has a dedicated space for remembrance and reflection.
It reflects our city’s long-standing tradition of solidarity, our stance against genocide and war, and our commitment to empathy and remembrance.

He added:

We have already made history with memorials recognising the genocide against the Tutsi people of Rwanda and the genocide against the Roma people.

By establishing a memorial for the Palestinian people, alongside the planting of an olive tree, we have the opportunity to make history again, which we will now work towards a date later this year.

Mohammed Wafi, of the Palestine Community North East, said:

Advertisement

We thank Councillor Rahman for his leadership in securing this historic approval. This memorial will mean a great deal to our community, and we will now work with him and the Council to deliver it.

Rahman said he would continue working with Newcastle’s Palestinian community and the city council to deliver the memorial later this year.

When completed, this will become the first Palestinian memorial of its kind in the UK and Europe.

Featured image supplied

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

TUC calls for urgent support for at-risk manufacturers as illegal war fuels Trumpflation

Published

on

TUC calls for urgent support for at-risk manufacturers as illegal war fuels Trumpflation

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has called for a targeted emergency package to protect UK companies from the effects of Donald Trump’s illegal war. The union body refers to at-risk manufacturers like chemicals, ceramics and glass. And it says:

Trump’s war must not put jobs in critical industries at risk.

In the face of “Trumpflation” sending gas and energy prices soaring, the TUC argues that urgent support is needed to protect energy intensive sectors from the economic damage of the war. Of course, any impact on the UK pales in comparison with the horrors in countries directly under attack. But the TUC points out the war and its consequences could affect thousands of UK jobs.

The call comes after the OECD warns the UK faces the biggest hit to growth of all G20 economies from the war in West Asia.

Emergency measures for most at-risk manufacturers

Immediate support should focus on the most at-risk businesses to protect key UK manufacturing sectors, the TUC says.

Advertisement

Gas-intensive businesses face the most immediate exposure in the current energy crisis. The union body is therefore calling for a temporary targeted gas price cap to stabilise the price of gas for critical industries. This would target sectors where gas accounts for at least 70% of energy demand (like ceramics), or at least 70% of raw materials.

As the effects of the war flow through to higher electricity prices for industry, the TUC is also calling for the government urgently to speed up its energy price support scheme (the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme – BICS) and make sure it reaches the manufacturing sites that need it the most. Many manufacturers (beyond those in gas-intensive industries) were already struggling before the crisis hit, and are now in even more need of support.

Fix the foundations to prevent future crises

Support must also go beyond the immediate crisis, the TUC argues. The UK has been at the “mercy of global gas markets for too long”. With an unstable president in the White House, and increasing volatility across the globe, UK households and businesses cannot afford to be “lurching from crisis to crisis”.

Alongside immediate-term support, the UK desperately needs structural change and investment so that industry doesn’t bear the brunt of future gas price spikes. This will also mean there is less need for government to step in during each crisis.

Advertisement

The TUC is calling for government to de-link electricity prices from gas. This would move the UK from being a price-taker to a price-maker. The government should also radically increase UK gas storage capacity, and accelerate investment in energy efficiency and electrification upgrades.

These proposals to reform the UK’s energy system and market design and to upgrade UK industry will reduce the UK’s industrial vulnerability to external crises, boost long-term resilience of domestic industries, and help protect good jobs for the long-run. Fixing the foundations of the UK’s energy market would support not just gas-intensive industries, but wider manufacturing like steel, metal and paper.

TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said:

Already struggling before the war, Trumpflation has sent gas prices soaring – further piling the pressure on some of Britain’s key industries like chemicals, ceramics and glass.

Trump’s war must not put jobs in critical industries at risk.

Advertisement

The government should urgently bring forward a temporary targeted gas price cap, to stabilise the price of gas for critical industries and protect UK manufacturing, and speed up the energy price support scheme making sure it reaches crucial sectors.

Smart government action can stop us lurching from crisis to crisis. The UK has been at the mercy of global gas markets for too long.

Now is the time to fix the foundations, reducing the UK’s vulnerability to global gas price shocks, boosting resilience of key industries, and protecting good jobs for the long-run.

Chief executive of Make UK Stephen Phipson said:

Advertisement

The war in Iran has highlighted vulnerabilities in the UK energy market that have been evident for some time and have not been addressed, the more that action is delayed the greater the risk of rapid deindustrialisation.

This now requires, urgent, efficient, and substantive action to bring down the cost of energy for industry as the clock is now approaching midnight for many companies.

This must start with the immediate implementation of the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme to all manufacturers otherwise we could face a rapid unravelling of British industry.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Faulty HMS Dragon Withdraws to Port

Published

on

The Mail reports that HMS Dragon, the only warship of Britain’s in the Middle Eastern region, has withdrawn to port “for repairs and logistics after experiencing issues with its fresh water supplies.” No comment…

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Home Office lying about ages of detained children

Published

on

Home Office lying about ages of detained children

The Home Office is routinely detaining so-called “age-disputed children” as adults as part of its ‘One in, one out’ asylum scheme. That’s according to an investigation from the independent Humans for Rights Network.

Despite Labour’s increasingly far-right anti-asylum posturing, it remains illegal to detain unaccompanied child asylum seekers in adult detention centers. However, the Home Office is routinely ignoring this rule by claiming that these children are, possibly, adults.

Home Office – ‘one in, one out’

In the seven months since ‘One in, one out’ began last September, the Home Office has detained 76 ‘age-disputed’ kids. However, Freedom of information (FOI) requests issued to local authority children’s services have found that claimants treated as adults by the Home Office are often later determined to be children by social workers.

Indeed, of the 76 detainees, 26 have either been reassessed as children by Social Services, or are in the process of being. Meanwhile, 11 kids are waiting for age assessment. The Home Office has already forcibly deported 13 to France.

Advertisement

Damningly, one child was confirmed to be a minor after being forcibly deported.

Among the kids in question, a large proportion are Sudanese, Eritrean, or Afghan – all zones of intense and brutal conflict. Humans for Rights Network spokesperson Maddie Harris stated that:

Many of these children are survivors of torture and trafficking and are experiencing acute declines in their mental health as a result of what is often months of detention in the UK.

These children are additionally prejudiced from accessing the care and support they are entitled to as children as well as adequate, social worker-led local authority age assessments. No child should be detained, with those who remain in detention immediately released to allow them to recover and to ensure they are able to access age assessments conducted in the community where required.

The National Age Assessment Board

Home Office age assessments fall under the domain of the National Age Assessment Board (NAAB). Watchdog groups like the Refugee and Migrant Children’s Consortium (RMCC) and Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI) have raised pressing concerns about NAAB’s processes and transparency.

Advertisement

In particular, NAAB blurs the boundaries between ‘independent’ social workers and immigration enforcement. Likewise, it also has a massive negative impact on the kids in its ‘care’, and its decisions are deeply questionable. An RMCC report stated that:

Multiple legal cases have found NAAB assessments to be flawed, with issues including failure to apply the benefit of the doubt; reliance on subjective or culturally inappropriate indicators; and the dismissal of credible evidence from professionals who know the child. Judges have criticised the NAAB’s approach as being adversarial, inconsistent with guidance, and lacking in objectivity.

Back on 25 March, the High Court was forced to step in to prevent the Home Office from deporting two ‘age-disputed’ kids. Solicitor Elizabeth Cole, who represented one of the children, explained the level of disregard the Home Office displayed:

The Home Office’s contention that claimed a child’s age need not be determined as a matter of fact prior to their removal is highly concerning, and clearly warrants proper consideration by the court. This is particularly so as children are an extremely vulnerable group. We hope this decision will encourage the Home Office to think twice before trying to remove any disputed children to France, in order to alleviate the distress and harm which will inevitably ensue by result.

Routine inhumanity

The Guardian confronted the Home Office with the Humans for Rights Networks’ record of its mistreatment of asylum seekers. However, the government department chose to issue a stock response:

This government is bearing down on small boat crossings. We have stopped over 42,000 illegal migrants attempting to cross the channel since the election. We have removed or deported almost 60,000 people who were here illegally.

But we are going further to remove the incentives that draw illegal migrants to this country and increase removals and deportations of those with no right to be here.

Advertisement

Apparently, those “incentives that draw illegal migrants” include the laws which require treating traumatised children with the care they so desperately need. After all, all the Home Office needs to do is state that they’re lying about being kids. Then, miracle of miracles, it’s free to deport them. No reasonable doubt needed.

If you still needed proof of the utter routine inhumanity of  successively more anti-asylum governments, then look no further.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Israel targets Iran’s railways infrastructure

Published

on

Israel targets Iran's railways infrastructure

Israel seems to believe warnings negate war crimes

The IOF tweeted an urgent warning in Farsi earlier Tuesday, telling people across Iran to avoid trains and railway lines until 9 pm local time.

Iran’s cultural heritage minister, Reza Salehi Amiri, wrote to UNESCO on Tuesday following the IOF’s war crimes.

He called IOF’s actions a clear attack on the common heritage of humanity, calling for a clear, immediate, and deterrent stance from UNESCO, as the Tehran Times reported.

Advertisement

Trump has called for further escalation. In his latest bizarre rant on Tuesday, Trump said he would wipe out the country unless it opened the straits of Hormuz ahead of a deadline he’d set for 8 pm on 7 April 2026. Trump said on Truth Social:

A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?

The whole US administration is either too ignorant to understand the nuclear threat behind Trump’s rant or is just going along with it. JD Vance, seemingly, endorsed Trump’s policies, whatever they may be,  after the expiration of the deadline.

The IOF and the US are operating without any restraint in their war against Palestine, Lebanon, and Iran, using similar tactics of total war, with no distinction between military and civilian targets.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

petition to kick firm out of UK gains momentum

Published

on

petition to kick firm out of UK gains momentum

A petition started by Zack Polanski to kick Palantir out of UK public services has nearly 160,000 signatures.

Palantir is a secretive US tech firm. It’s embedding itself in UK public services, including running a huge patient database for the NHS.

Essentially, the company helps government spy agencies collect huge amounts of private data about citizens – including ICE in the US and the Israeli military.

Advertisement

But it also provides terrifying AI-powered military tools to the Israeli government, which it uses to carry out its Genocide in Gaza, along with its recent attacks in Iran and Lebanon.

Peter Thiel co-founded the company. Unsurprisingly, he is a billionaire Trump donor and close friend of Jeffrey Epstein.

However, the UK CEO is Louis Mosley, grandson of British fascist, Oswald Mosley.

Palantir infiltrating Britain

The company has slowly made its way into British infrastructure. During the pandemic, the government suspiciously handed Palantir a huge contract – supposedly worth only £1. This was to create a COVID-19 data store that would provide ministers with real-time information on health services and the pandemic.

Advertisement

Now, it has contracts worth over £500m with the UK government alone. This includes software which NHS doctors and nurses are flat-out refusing to use because of ‘privacy’ and ‘human rights concerns.

Palantir also has a £240m deal with the UK military. Again, there was no competitive tender process, and the government just handed Palantir the deal.

The Petition to kick Palantir out of UK public services, started by Zack Polanski, has close to 160,000 signatures. It emphasises:

But right now we’ve got a major chance to get their NHS deal scrapped – and kick start a domino effect that sees ALL their contracts ended.

How? Ministers actually have the option to cancel the NHS deal early. But with these contracts flying under the radar, it’ll take all of us speaking up to make that happen. If you agree that our NHS and other public services shouldn’t be cutting deals with a private company that helps armies kill people, sign the petition now!

Featured image via 38Degrees

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

President Threatens Iran, Sparks Impeachment Calls

Published

on

President Threatens Iran, Sparks Impeachment Calls

The US president’s latest deranged Truth Social post came just hours before the deadline he imposed for Tehran to start allowing traffic to pass through the key waterway.

Around one-fifth of the global oil supply is transported through the strait, but it has been effectively closed since America and Israel began bombing Iran at the end of February.

Trump announced over the weekend that Tehran had until 1am tomorrow UK time to confirm they were ceasing attacks on ships trying to use the strait or else “all hell will reign down” on them.

In a follow-up post on Truth Social on Sunday, he said: “Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH!”

Advertisement

Posting on Tuesday morning, Trump said: “A whole civilisation will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalised minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end. God Bless the Great People of Iran!”

His comments were widely condemned online, with leading Republican and former White House official Bill Kristol calling for Trump to be impeached.

Veteran journalist and broadcast Andrew Neil said: “Is there anybody, any group, capable of staging an intervention in the White House?”

Piers Morgan, a former Trump supporter, described the president’s statement as “a brazen pre-admission of genocide … which would obviously be a war crime”.

Advertisement

Other responses on X were equally critical of the president’s comments.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Are Politicians Taking Misogyny Seriously Enough?

Published

on

Are Politicians Taking Misogyny Seriously Enough?

There’s no denying that misogyny has been a hot topic in Westminster in recent months.

Politicians have not been shy when it comes to weighing in on moments like Louis Theroux’s recent documentary, Inside The Manosphere, and last year’s Netflix drama Adolescence.

Both cultural moments raised serious questions about the way men are being influenced in the modern era and how women are protected.

But the subject has hit close to home for several in Downing Street, too.

Advertisement

Keir Starmer has been accused of setting up a “boys’ club” at the top of government while female cabinet ministers claim unnamed officials have been issuing “sexist briefings” against them.

The topic then came to a head earlier this year when the depth of Peter Mandelson’s relationship with the late convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was revealed by the US Department of Justice.

The former Labour peer was chosen by prime minister to be the ambassador to the US last year. Though he was fired after a handful of months in the job, questions remain over just why he got the plum role in the first place.

How was his association with Epstein – elements of which had been reported on by the time of his appointment – overlooked by senior figures in the government?

Advertisement

Labour vowed to champion equality when in opposition, celebrated when a record number of female MPs were elected in 2024, and rolled out a Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy earlier this year.

But, as politicians face accusations of not reflecting these attitudes in their everyday lives, there are fears this is akin to paying lip service to a wider issue – especially with women in Westminster often feeling the direct effects of sexism themselves.

During Thursday’s episode of Commons People with guest Millie Cooke – The Independent’s political correspondent – we look at how Westminster deals with misogyny – and what else can be done to improve it.

Listen to find out more below…

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Concussion Symptoms To Watch For Days After A Brain Injury

Published

on

Vision issues, concentration problems and headaches can all come on days after a concussion.

When I tripped over my daughter’s bathroom stool and hit my head on the bathtub, I thought it was harmless. I didn’t lose consciousness or even have a bump on my head.

It wasn’t until hours later that I started feeling fatigued and a bit off. A few days later, I thought I felt back to normal until I tried to work on my laptop — and the world started spinning. A pounding headache and intense brain fog followed, and then I knew I was dealing with a concussion.

“Many people who experience a concussion don’t actually feel any of the symptoms until hours later,” explained Dr. Daniel Daneshvar, the chief of Spaulding’s brain injury rehabilitation program and co-director of the Sports Concussion Clinic at Mass General Brigham in Massachusetts.

Additionally, symptoms can “intensify or evolve over the first several days,” added Dr. Kevin Bickart, an assistant professor in neurology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Advertisement

Because of this, the criteria for diagnosing a concussion now include symptoms that appear within a 72-hour window, according to the 2023 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

While many know to pay attention to symptoms right after a head injury, it’s often overlooked to watch for those that may appear hours, days or even weeks later. And because head injuries are common and can be debilitating, it’s important to know what to look for and when you need to seek help.

We talked to neurologists and concussion experts about these unexpected delayed symptoms, why they may not appear right away and what it means if you’re experiencing them.

First of all, what is a concussion exactly?

Advertisement

A concussion is a brain injury that’s “caused when the cells in the brain, the neurones, stretch or get otherwise damaged,” explained Daneshvar. “What happens then is the cells that are normally well-regulated in sending messages … [to] one another start sending messages erratically and in an uncontrolled fashion.”

These brain cells start using way more energy than they receive, and this “energy crisis” causes symptoms to appear, he said.

Concussion symptoms can really vary because this is “happening in the brain that controls everything from balance [and] headache[s] [to] vision, mood [and] memory,” added Dr. Shae Datta, a neurologist and co-director of the NYU Langone Concussion Center.

These changes in the brain are microscopic and often don’t appear in imaging like a CT or MRI scan, she said. Imaging only detects larger structural issues, like a brain bleed, significant swelling or skull fracture. So identifying symptoms is a key part of diagnosing a concussion.

Advertisement

What signs or symptoms should you watch for after you hit your head, even hours or days later?

One of the first signs people often look for after hitting their heads are bumps, bruises or other marks of injury. But this doesn’t necessarily mean you have a concussion.

“There isn’t a great connection between what you see on the outside of the skull and what’s going on inside,” Daneshvar noted.

While every individual is different, usually in the first 24 hours after a concussion you may experience more physical symptoms, like dizziness, headaches, nausea and sensitivity to light and noise, Bickart said. About three to seven days later, cognitive and emotional symptoms may pop up, such as anxiety, irritability, trouble focusing, memory issues and brain fog.

Advertisement

“This ‘second wave’ often catches patients off guard because they thought they were recovering,” he explained.

That said, every brain injury is unique, so any of these symptoms could appear immediately or later on, Datta added.

For example, “it doesn’t always happen that no irritability occurs immediately,” Bickart said. “Some people after a concussion can become completely emotionally dysregulated in the moment … crying hysterically … It’s not the most common thing that occurs, but it can.”

Symptoms can also transform over time. For instance, the pain of headaches (the most common concussion symptom) may feel different days or weeks later. Initially, it might feel like “pressure and pounding” all over the head and then eventually be “more intermittent … and only on one side,” he explained.

Advertisement

Disruptions in your sleep-wake cycles may change from feeling like you need to sleep more to actually having insomnia later on, Bickart said.

Vision issues could also evolve and include blurred or double vision or difficulties with focusing the eyes and tracking objects, according to the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Vision issues, concentration problems and headaches can all come on days after a concussion.

Fiordaliso via Getty Images

Vision issues, concentration problems and headaches can all come on days after a concussion.

Why can symptoms appear delayed?

“Immediately after a hit, the brain dumps adrenaline and burns [energy] rapidly … which can mask symptoms,” Bickart said. “It is only hours or days later, when the brain’s energy fuel … is depleted” that symptoms may become more apparent.

Advertisement

Especially if the injury happens in a sports environment, it may not be “until the adrenaline wears off that you start to notice, ‘Hey, I’m feeling kind of tired actually’ or ’I’m having trouble concentrating,” Daneshvar explained.

Additionally, damage from the injury can lead to inflammation in the brain and affect different cells, he said.

Inflammation “often doesn’t peak until three to seven days post-injury,” Bickart said. This is what can “drive that ‘second wave’ of brain fog and fatigue.”

Lastly, as an individual returns to work, school or other everyday demands after resting, they may observe new symptoms “because they [haven’t] exposed … or pushed themselves” in this way yet.

Advertisement

What should you do if you experience delayed symptoms?

“Just because the symptoms are delayed, it doesn’t [necessarily] mean something catastrophic is going on,” Daneshvar said. “The important thing to note is … if symptoms are worsening rather than improving … or if … [there are] red flag symptoms.”

Red flags that you should go to the emergency room include a worsening headache, increased confusion, repeated vomiting, losing consciousness for more than 30 seconds, blood or fluid coming from the ears or nose, changes in your vision, constant ringing in the ears, weakness, seizures, difficulty speaking and large head bumps and bruises, according to Mayo Clinic.

If you experience delayed symptoms (after 48 hours) that don’t require emergency care, reach out to your primary care doctor and they can help you decide if a referral to a neurologist or imaging is necessary, advised Dr. Dharti Dua, a neurologist at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.

Advertisement

You also want to get adequate rest and be careful not to get another concussion soon after because this makes you “more prone to a delayed recovery,” she said.

If symptoms appear days later, stop the activity that triggered them, but do not retreat to a dark room for days,” Bickart said. “We now know that strict rest beyond 48 hours actually prolongs symptoms.”

For symptoms that last beyond two weeks, active treatments are recommended, he added. For example, vestibular rehabilitation therapy treats dizziness and balance issues, and cognitive therapy teaches strategies for managing brain fog.

Datta advises looking for concussion centres because they specialise in brain injuries and offer a multidisciplinary team.

Advertisement

“It takes more than one kind of doctor to diagnose and manage you,” she explained.

These centres often include concussion experts from neurologists to physical therapists to neuro-ophthalmologists.

“The hopeful sentiment is that a concussion is very treatable. Most people recover pretty quickly, within a week or two,” Bickart said. For those who may have delayed or longer lasting symptoms, “there are tons of treatments out there … [and] you can still get the right help and recover.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025