Connect with us

Politics

Anna Farris Talks Challenging ‘Religious’ Son Jack On Right-Wing Politics

Published

on

Anna Faris with her son, Jack Pratt, at the latest Scary Movie film premiere earlier this year

Anna Faris has opened up about parenting a “religious” child when she isn’t religious herself, on the latest episode of Chelsea Handler’s podcast.

The Scary Movie actor shares a son, 14-year-old Jack, with her ex-husband, Chris Pratt.

During Thursday’s episode of Dear Chelsea, the topic of Anna and Chris’ teenage son came up, when Chelsea was asking her guest about her family life.

Anna began by describing her son as “solid as a tugboat, emotionally”.

Advertisement

“He just doesn’t get easily jarred — he handles situations really well,” she said. “He is … religious.”

Chelsea then asked Anna whether she identifies as “religious”, to which she responded: “No, I didn’t grow up with religion. He’s asked me to accept Jesus Christ…”

“…As your saviour?” Chelsea interjected.

“Uh huh,” the House Bunny star confirmed. “And I told him I would do anything for him, including this, but it’s gonna take a whole lot of long conversations.”

Advertisement
Anna Faris with her son, Jack Pratt, at the latest Scary Movie film premiere earlier this year
Anna Faris with her son, Jack Pratt, at the latest Scary Movie film premiere earlier this year

Michael Buckner via Getty Images

She went on to explain that by “long conversations”, she meant discussions in which she challenged the right-wing politics typically associated with some factions of Christianity.

Anna offered a prelude to some of her examples by saying her son is “impressive” with his responses.

“I try to challenge him. I’m like, ‘Do you think it’s a luxury that you get to be pro-life?’ [and] he’s like, ‘Maybe’,” Anna said. “Or I’ll say, ‘So, what do you think of this mega pastor that’s kind of a grifter?’ [And] he’s like, ‘Oh, mega pastors are the worst’.”

“So it’s like, OK… we’re getting there,” Anna said, sounding a touch exasperated.

Advertisement

Anna said that ultimately she’s “appreciative that he’s examining religion the way he is in terms of recognising hypocrisy”.

“I’m appreciative we can have these long conversations,” she added, before Chelsea leaped at the opportunity to change the subject.

Chris Pratt and Anna Faris with their son Jack in 2017
Chris Pratt and Anna Faris with their son Jack in 2017

Axelle/Bauer-Griffin via Getty Images

Ever since, the Parks & Recreation alum has become more vocal about his religious and right-wing views.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Anna has been married to the cinematographer Michael Barrett since 2021.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Ariana Grande Slams Donald Trump For Using Her Song In Anti-Trans Post

Published

on

Donald Trump

Ariana Grande had some choice words for Donald Trump after the US leader’s team used her music in a post taking aim at the transgender community.

Earlier this week, the Grammy winner spoke out after her song We Can’t Be Friends (Wait For Your Love) was featured in a TikTok shared by the verified account @TeamTrump.

“Me and my truth we sit in silence… men can’t have babies and should never compete in women’s sports,” the post read alongside the caption: “This shouldn’t be controversial!”

Before long, Ariana popped up in the comments to tell the Trump administration “Never use my music again.”

Advertisement

“Also, your truth is false,” she added, speaking in defence of transgender people.

Donald Trump

Earlier in the summer, Ariana was similarly perturbed to see her Eternal Sunshine cut Bye had been featured in a video depicting arrests being carried out by ICE agents.

Please do not ever use my music in relation to this barbaric, inhumane, heinous nonsense. [Fuck] ICE,” she wrote at the time, before the song clip was removed.

@TeamTrump’s post now no longer features We Can’t Be Friends (Wait For Your Love), either.

Ariana is currently in the middle of her final stretch of her dates on her Eternal Sunshine world tour, with six dates left of her 10-night run at London’s iconic O2 Arena.

Advertisement

These include, Save The Children UK, Micro Rainbow, The Proud Trust, Choose Love, LGBT Consortium and Trans+ Solidarity Alliance.

The Hate That I Made You Love Me singer has long been a vocal ally to the trans people.

She notably voiced her support for the transgender community in January 2025, after comments made by Trump during his second inauguration speech.

Advertisement

Help and support:

  • The Gender Trust supports anyone affected by gender identity | 01527 894 838
  • Mermaids offers information, support, friendship and shared experiences for young people with gender identity issues | 0208 1234819
  • LGBT Youth Scotland is the largest youth and community-based organisation for LGBT people in Scotland. Text 07786 202 370
  • Gires provides information for trans people, their families and professionals who care for them | 01372 801554
  • Depend provides support, advice and information for anyone who knows, or is related to, a transsexual person in the UK

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Prince Harry And Meghan Markle’s UK Move: What To Know

Published

on

Prince Harry and Meghan on Jan. 7, 2020, in London, England. The photo was taken just one day before the two announced their decision to “step back.”

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle sparked a wave of reaction online Wednesday night after it was revealed that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are returning to the UK.

Harry and Meghan are set to move imminently with their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, according to The Telegraph and People magazine, who were the first to report the news.

Here’s what we know so far:

When did Harry and Meghan leave the UK?

Advertisement

The Sussexes announced they were stepping back from the royal family on January 8, 2020, in a shocking post on their now-defunct Instagram account, Sussex Royal.

At the time, the two said they were “working to become financially independent, while continuing to fully support Her Majesty The Queen,” while also splitting their time between the UK and North America.

Prince Harry and Meghan on Jan. 7, 2020, in London, England. The photo was taken just one day before the two announced their decision to “step back.”
Prince Harry and Meghan on Jan. 7, 2020, in London, England. The photo was taken just one day before the two announced their decision to “step back.”

WPA Pool via Getty Images

What is the timeline for Harry and Meghan’s move?

The family of four are settling across the pond quickly, as Archie, 7, and Lili, 5, will start school in the UK in September.

Advertisement

Where are Harry and Meghan moving?

Sources close to the royal couple are keeping the royal’s whereabouts private, as they have repeatedly faced concerns about their safety over the years, though it’s thought that the family will settle outside of London.

One thing is clear, and that is that the couple are not moving into a royal residence. Harry and Meghan were asked to vacate their UK home, Frogmore Cottage, in 2023 following the publication of Harry’s memoir called Spare.

The couple currently have residences in Montecito, California, and a vacation home in Portugal.

Advertisement

What are the reasons for their return?

Harry and Meghan haven’t yet directly addressed why they’re heading back to the UK.

One line of thinking is the move is for Harry and his family to be closer to King Charles III, 77, who was diagnosed with cancer in 2024. Harry made a remarkable disclosure to the BBC last year, in which he said, “I don’t know how much longer my father has. He won’t speak to me because of this security stuff.”

Though Harry and Charles weren’t speaking at the time, the two have since reconciled – though the status of the monarch’s health remains in question.

Advertisement

Charles’ health aside, Harry has also spoken fondly of his love for the UK, and wanting to show his children his home more, something he once said he hasn’t been able to do because of security concerns.

LOIC VENANCE via Getty Images

“I can’t see a world in which I would bring my wife and children back to the UK at this point,” he told BBC last year. “The things that they’re going to miss is, well, everything. I love my country … despite what some people in that country have done … and I think that it’s really quite sad that I won’t be able to show my children my homeland.”

Harry and Meghan ended up bringing their children to the UK in July, where the family met privately with King Charles and Queen Camilla.

What do people in the UK think?

Advertisement

According to a YouGov poll conducted and published on Thursday, 44% of Britons say they don’t know if the couple should move back, while 33% of those surveyed think the royals should not return ― leaving 21% in favor of the move.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Melania Trump’s 1st Public Appearance In A Month Inspires Online Suspicion

Published

on

Melania Trump's 1st Public Appearance In A Month Inspires Online Suspicion

Melania Trump made her first public appearance in a month on Thursday, but the timing of her return to public life just inspired a lot of suspicion on social media.

The first lady attended a White House event announcing the launch of Fostering The Future, a new scholarship program that helps young adults transition out of foster care.

It was her first appearance in public since she appeared at the World Cup final on July 19.

“I heard you missed me,” Trump said to the crowd gathered in the Rose Garden. “Here I am.”

Advertisement

Although the purported purpose of the first lady’s appearance was to promote the initiative, many people on social media were suspicious whether that was the real reason – or whether there was a Natalie Harp factor.

The White House has recently been rocked by revelations of Trump’s close relationship with Harp, an aide who is known as the “Human Printer,” and for her “extreme devotion” and “borderline obsession” with the president.

Harp’s relationship with Trump has gotten closer scrutiny this week after Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff (Democrat) referred to her in a speech on Sunday, saying the president doesn’t actually “want to do the job,” and instead “wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar.”

And, yes, social media had thoughts. Lots of thoughts.

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

‘They can come and arrest me’

Published

on

‘They can come and arrest me’

The post ‘They can come and arrest me’ appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Does ‘Zebra Striping’ Prevent Hangovers?

Published

on

Does 'Zebra Striping' Prevent Hangovers?

I don’t know about you, but as I’ve gotten older my tolerance for alcohol has gone right out of the window. Hangovers nowadays are nightmarish – to the point where I’ve practically stopped drinking altogether.

According to Lauren Booker, author of Try Dry: The Official Guide to a Month Off Booze, hangovers do get worse as we age because everything in our bodies tends to slow down, including our livers, which find it harder to process alcohol into harmless waste products.

“This means there are more toxins in our bodies for longer as they’re broken down more slowly into carbon dioxide and water,” she previously told HuffPost UK.

Before it turns to that, alcohol is broken down by the liver into a number of different substances, including the compound acetaldehyde. And guess what? As we age, our ability to metabolise acetaldehyde is also reduced.

Advertisement

To add insult to injury, many of us are just not fit as we once were. “More body fat and less muscle make the alcohol we consume more concentrated in the body,” said Booker, “leading to dehydration and worsening the dreaded hangover.”

In a bid to try and steer clear of horrific hangovers, people are unsurprisingly turning to ‘zebra striping’ when out on the town. In fact, you’ve probably done it yourself.

What is zebra striping?

It’s a tactic where you opt for an alcoholic beverage and follow up with a non-alcoholic drink before flitting back to booze for your next drink.

Advertisement

The idea is that you’re drinking less overall and staying hydrated.

Does it work?

In theory, yes. But a pharmacist has warned the drinking trend could actually make hangovers worse if you’re not properly considering the drinks you alternate with.

Karen Hutchinson, prescribing pharmacist at online pharmacy Chemist4U, said: “Zebra striping is a smart way to reduce your alcohol intake and stay more hydrated, but not all drink choices are equal.

Advertisement

“Many people focus on alternating drinks but overlook what’s actually in the glass.”

She noted that dark spirits such as whisky, rum and brandy contain higher levels of compounds called congeners, “which are linked to more severe hangover symptoms”.

And sugary soft drinks can contribute to dehydration and blood sugar spikes, potentially making symptoms like fatigue, nausea and headaches feel worse the next day.

How to ‘zebra stripe’ effectively

Advertisement

The pharmacist said some of the best non-alcoholic choices to go for are water and electrolyte drinks, including some sports beverages, coconut water or infused water, or 100% fruit juices (with a pinch of salt added). These may contain useful minerals like sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and more.

As for alcoholic options, clear spirits like gin and vodka are “generally associated with fewer hangover-related compounds”.

She advises against ordering doubles or stronger alcoholic drinks, as “alternating only works if your alcohol intake actually drops”.

“If you’re replacing the single vodka with a double vodka every round, you’re unlikely to feel better the next day,” said Hutchinson.

Advertisement

Start hydrating before your first drink, so you’re not starting the night off dehydrated. “Having a pint of water before you start drinking and regularly topping up throughout the night is often more effective than trying to play catch-up at the end,” she added.

And don’t forget to eat beforehand, too.

“One of the biggest mistakes people make is relying on a takeaway at the end of the night. A balanced meal before drinking helps slow alcohol absorption and gives your body more time to process alcohol gradually,” said Hutchinson.

“While a late-night burger might feel helpful, it’s unlikely to undo the effects of drinking on an empty stomach.”

Advertisement

Once the night is over, don’t forget to have one last water before you hit the hay. “The easiest hangover-reduction habit is one of the [most] overlooked,” she said.

“Finishing the night with a large glass of water or electrolyte drink can help replace some of the fluids lost through alcohol and may reduce the severity of dehydration-related symptoms the next morning.”

Here’s to fewer head-banging hangovers!

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The musical chairs of the progressive alliance

Published

on

The musical chairs of the progressive alliance

Every modern progressive government operates on a convenient myth: the idea that every ‘protected class’, minority interest, and social justice cause forms a single, harmonious mosaic. In the UK and Europe, the political establishment and NGO network have built a policy apparatus designed to champion every coalition cause simultaneously – from gender self-identification and diversity mandates to animal welfare and multicultural integration.

Yet beneath the polished press releases lies an inescapable reality: these causes do not live in harmony. They are instead locked in direct, irreconcilable conflict.

By attempting to appease every vocal interest group at once, Westminster, the civil service and the UK political establishment are playing a high-stakes game of political musical chairs. The government can blast the ‘diversity and inclusion’ soundtrack and dance around in circles as much as it wants. But there will always be a missing chair when the music stops. You simply cannot satisfy every group when their foundational demands actively cancel each other out.

Advertisement

Women’s rights are the most obvious example. For decades, feminism fought to protect female spaces and celebrate the distinct reality of women. Today, progressive dogma undermines these achievements by asserting that subjective gender self-declaration must legally override biological sex. And women pay the price in safety, privacy and fairness.

It is beyond dispute that male puberty confers lasting advantages in bone density, heart size, and lung capacity that hormone suppression cannot erase. Look no further than biological athletes like Lia Thomas dominating America’s women’s championship swimming in 2022.

The absurdity extends directly into public health, law enforcement and crime reporting. Medical institutions rewrite language to replace ‘breastfeeding’ with clinical terms like ‘chestfeeding’ or ‘lactating parent’ to satisfy gender activists, eroding the distinct biological concept of motherhood. Placing men with histories of violence or sexual offences into women’s prisons directly compromises the physical safety of vulnerable female inmates. You cannot champion women’s rights while systematically dismantling the definition of what a woman is.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Advertisement

Please wait…

Advertisement

An even more glaring paradox is the modern left’s uncritical embrace of fundamentalist religious doctrine – notably Islam – under the banner of diversity. Western progressivism celebrates radical bodily autonomy, sex education and LGBTQ+ rights as supreme civil rights achievements. Radical feminists push ‘Free the Nipple’ campaigns, claiming modesty is a patriarchal tool. Yet under the very same progressive banner, activists defend religious modesty garments like the burqa and niqab as supreme acts of empowerment.

This selective blindness becomes catastrophic when progressive policy collides with brutal practices, often imported via mass immigration. While feminism claims to defend female autonomy, Western authorities routinely tiptoe around issues like female genital mutilation, forced marriages and ‘honour killings’. Worse still, institutions actively conceal sexual violence to protect multicultural narratives from public scrutiny – the most glaring example of which has been the rape-gang scandal in the UK.

Advertisement

Even more bizarre is the alliance between militant LGBTQ+ activism and conservative religious groups. In Western cities, we witness the absurd spectacle of ‘Queers for Palestine’ banners, marching in support of regimes and movements where homosexuality is a crime. To see this collision in the UK, look no further than the protests outside two Birmingham primary schools in 2019. When schools introduced diversity lessons covering gay relationships, hundreds of conservative Muslim parents protested outside the schools. Eventually, a court injunction was needed to stop them.

When an ‘alliance’ consists of fundamentally incompatible groups, how do they avoid tearing each other apart? They create a phantom enemy. To prevent the coalition from fracturing, the NGO complex and the political class fabricated a conveniently elastic bogeyman: the ‘far right’.

Advertisement

By slapping this nuclear label on anyone who notices the contradictions – whether it is a feminist concerned about women’s prisons, or an ordinary citizen questioning mass immigration – the establishment creates an artificial common enemy. They treat disagreement not as a valid political stance, but as a dangerous moral contagion.

This rhetorical trick is the supreme political glue of our time. It forces radical feminists, religious conservatives, gender theorists and animal rights activists to ignore their irreconcilable differences and unite against a manufactured monster. If you question the narrative, you aren’t pointing out a logical flaw – you are simply ‘far right’. It is a cheap, lazy deflection designed to silence debate when the arguments no longer make sense.

When core doctrines directly contradict each other, compromise is impossible. Sooner or later, the music will stop.

Advertisement

Charlotte Hayes is a writer.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

How Memory Changes With Age (It’s Not Just Forgetting)

Published

on

How Memory Changes With Age (It's Not Just Forgetting)

Though dementia risk rises as we age, memory changes can be a part of healthy ageing.

Some people might occasionally miss a bill, find it harder to take in new information, or lose things without having anything to worry about (we’ve written before about the differences between normal age-related memory loss and differences you should speak to a GP about).

But some researchers think standard memory “loss” isn’t as straightforward as it sounds.

Professor Louis Renoult, the lead researcher in a paper published in Psychology and Ageing, said: “We wanted to better understand how young and older adults retrieve autobiographical memories – the personal experiences that form the story of our lives.

Advertisement

“These sorts of memories can range from… one-time events, such as a birthday party [specific memories], to more general or repeated experiences like commuting to work [episodic memories].

“We focused on how flexible people are when asked to shift between these types of memories, and what happens when that flexibility is put under pressure.”

In what way do older people’s memories change?

In this study, researchers spoke to 74 participants – 37 students and 37 older adults. They were asked to recall both specific (general) and episodic (repeated) memories related to words, like “market”.

Advertisement

In the beginning, they stuck to one form of recollection (either episodic or specific). But later, they were asked to shift between memory types.

Then, the researchers measured how well different participants’ memories did by age.

Prof Renoult, part of the University of East Anglia’s School of Psychology, said: “We found that across all age groups, memory performance declined when participants had to switch between memory types.

“However, older adults were particularly affected in one area – they were less accurate at recalling more mundane repetitive memories, like commuting to work under switching conditions.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, their ability to recall more specific memories, like a party, suffered far less.

“This suggests that certain types of memory retrieval may be more vulnerable to the effects of ageing when multitasking or adapting to changing demands,” added the professor.

Then, there was the nature of the memories to consider. When remembering specific events, older adults’ answers had fewer details about things like sights, sounds, and emotions.

Instead, they remembered more semantic details, including general knowledge; the same was true for episodic memories.

Advertisement

“When older adults recall events, the richness of those memories may be reduced,” Prof Renoult continued. “As we get older, our memories tend to become less detailed and more general, focusing on the overall story rather than specific moments.

“This shift may reflect changes in underlying brain systems involved in memory, particularly those responsible for retrieving detailed contextual information and managing complex cognitive tasks.”

Researchers hope this can teach us more about cognitive ageing

The researchers hope findings like these can help us to learn more about the cognitive traits that may benefit or harm older people.

Advertisement

Their findings, Prof Renoult said, have “practical implications for everyday life”.

“ Tasks that require people to quickly adapt their thinking or switch between different kinds of recall – such as storytelling, decision-making or problem-solving – may become more challenging with age,” added the expert.

“At the same time, the increased reliance on semantic knowledge may have benefits. Generalised memories can support wisdom, pattern recognition, and efficient communication, even if the finer details are lost.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

How Jonathan Haidt turned the fight over kids and social media into a political movement

Published

on

How Jonathan Haidt turned the fight over kids and social media into a political movement

How Jonathan Haidt turned the fight over kids and social media into a political movement

lead image

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jewish anti-Zionist Tony Greenstein takes the stand in ‘terror’ trial

Published

on

Tony Greenstein

Tony Greenstein

Day three of Tony Greenstein’s trial at Kingston Crown Court before Judge Sarah Plaschkes KC saw the defendant take the witness stand. There was significant tension over what evidence the jury was permitted to consider.

Judge orders jury to leave court repeatedly

Tony Greenstein, a 72-year-old Jewish anti-Zionist, Marxist, and atheist from Brighton, faces charges under Section 12(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 of inviting support for a proscribed organisation, Hamas, following social media posts published on 7 October 2023.

The defence team openly referred to evidence that the Crown and the court had decided the jury should not be allowed to see. The defence cross-examined police on the gap between the size of the original interview transcript and the heavily redacted one shown to the jury. Consequently, the judge ordered the jury to leave the court on several occasions in an attempt to prevent the defence from referring to excluded evidence.

Greenstein stated in evidence that the prosecution had actively resisted admitting his past writings because his decades-long opposition to religious fundamentalism directly undermined the Crown’s allegations.

Advertisement

Tony Greenstein’s heritage

In the morning, under questioning from his defence barrister, Lawrence McNulty, Tony Greenstein laid out his identity and heritage in detail. He told the jury he was raised in an Orthodox Jewish household as the son of a travelling rabbi who stood on the frontline at the 1936 Battle of Cable Street, helping erect barricades in east London to stop Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists from marching.

He testified that his father hated the Conservative Party due to widespread antisemitism in 1930s Britain.

Greenstein explained he went from a childhood within a Zionist family to abandoning Zionism at age 14 or 15, subsequently dedicating decades to socialist, anti-racist, and pro-Palestinian campaigning.

He told the court that Christians can also be Zionists and defined antisemitism by its original nineteenth-century meaning as the hatred of Jews. When asked about his view on religion from the stand, he quoted Marx, describing it as the “opium of the masses”.

Advertisement

There were frequent, sharp interruptions from the bench. When Greenstein described Gaza as a “human prison” and a “cage” where Palestinians were held under siege for 57 years, surviving on polluted water and strictly rationed electricity, Judge Plaschkes halted proceedings.

When the defence touched on the history of Zionism, previous escalations in Gaza, and casualty figures, with Greenstein stating at least 100,000 had died, the judge intervened.

‘That’s the problem with the ruling class’

Warning that the court was not tasked with examining the broader history of the Middle East, the judge directed the defendant to stay focused on the specific indictment. Tony Greenstein retorted from the witness box that:

that’s the problem with the ruling class in this country, they turn a blind eye to genocide.

Judge Plaschkes repeatedly ordered the jury to withdraw to the jury room while parameters of questioning were argued between counsel and the bench, reminding Greenstein that the court was not a political forum.

Advertisement

When proceedings resumed before the jury, the defence examined Greenstein’s public writing record on his website, azvsas.blogspot.com, which spans over 3,500 published articles since 2008 covering Palestine, gay rights, disability, and progressive causes.

The defence presented blog titles and excerpts from historic pieces where Greenstein had explicitly condemned Hamas, including articles titled “The lousy hamas government” (citing The Angry Arab and Israeli newspaper Haaretz) and “Hamas does its best to make Palestinian lives a misery”.

He also referenced a post titled “I support the Palestinians not Israeli created Hamas”, where he argued that divide and rule is a colonial imperial playbook and that Israel funded and armed religious movements to prevent a two-state solution.

Alleged clear distinctions

Giving evidence, Tony Greenstein stated he has consistently argued in over 20 blogs that national liberation movements cannot succeed under religious fundamentalist leadership. He described Hamas as a conservative traditional sect, noting their stance on homosexuality is a social taboo, but not executable like in Saudi Arabia. He pointed out that historical Britain was homophobic and that his father, who lost most of his family in the Holocaust, noted the only good thing Hitler did was kill all the gays.

Advertisement

His commentary on 7 October related to a tactical breach of an impregnable military perimeter after a 17-year blockade, comparing the event to historic Caribbean slave revolts. He testified that he had limited information on the day, but knew there was a breakout and felt it was justified.

He drew a clear distinction between supporting an act of resistance against military occupation and endorsing the organisation carrying it out, comparing it to supporting the French Resistance during the Second World War without endorsing the communists.

Asked directly by McNulty if he did, has, or ever supported Hamas, Greenstein stated he answers no. He said he supports it as part of the resistance, but as an organisation he does not support it. When asked if he would invite anyone to support Hamas as an organisation, he replied: “No, obviously not. It would be absurd.”

Addressing his post stating that Hamas should be congratulated for the breach, Greenstein explained it was a rhetorical figure of speech, adding that if he was the recruitment sergeant they think he is, he would not have started with his criticisms.

Advertisement

When defence counsel asked whether his post was an instruction for ordinary members of the public to contact and congratulate Hamas, Greenstein replied: “No… presuming they have the number, which I don’t.”

Cross examining Tony Greenstein

During cross-examination, prosecutor Kate Temple-Mabe faced the complex task of prosecuting an anti-Zionist Marxist defendant for allegedly promoting an Islamist organisation whose politics he has long opposed.

The Crown stated that it did not allege Tony Greenstein held wholesale or long-term ideological support for Hamas, but argued instead that his words on 7 October constituted an invitation of support in that specific moment for a “Gaza ghetto uprising”.

The prosecution questioned his reach on X and whether he wanted people to share his posts. Greenstein stated he was simply sharing political opinions rather than proselytising, adding that his reach was minimal as he believed his account was shadow-banned among feeds dominated by “lots of Elon Musk-type people ranting about immigrants”.

Advertisement

The prosecution focused on granular linguistic analysis, questioning Greenstein on his specific use of the words “one” and “we” in the tweet stating “whatever ones criticisms of Hamas, we should congratulate them”. Greenstein rejected the assertion that he was inciting followers to endorse a banned organisation, accusing the prosecution of an obsession with Hamas and maintaining he was offering political analysis of an anti-colonial counter-offensive.

The trial continues

The prosecution also cross-examined Tony Greenstein on later commentary from early 2024 involving Peter Tatchell regarding LGBTQ+ rights under Hamas governance. Greenstein argued that criticisms of reactionary social policies should be made at a different time and not weaponised to justify genocide. Greenstein reiterated that his focus during ongoing military actions remained centred on solidarity with the Palestinian people to get food and aid in, and stopping the bombing.

Following the conclusion of cross-examination, the jury was dismissed ahead of tomorrow’s closing speeches.

Featured image via the Crispin Flintoff Show- screengrab

Advertisement

By Ranjan Balakumaran

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Republican Voter Has A Blunt 1 Word Message For Donald Trump

Published

on

Republican Voter Has A Blunt 1 Word Message For Donald Trump

An Ohio voter had a straightforward message for President Donald Trump amid the ongoing controversy surrounding Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio).

Rich Beeby, a resident of Strongsville, Ohio, and a self-proclaimed registered Republican, told NBC News’ Jon Allen on Tuesday that he’s not happy with the direction the Republican Party has been taking lately.

“Hopefully it finds its way,” Beeby said.

“If you could say something to President Trump right now, what would you say?” Allen asked.

Advertisement

“Resign,” Beeby said. “You’re destroying the country.”

Allen also said that Beeby told him he would not be voting for Miller in the upcoming midterm elections.

Another Ohio voter who spoke with Allen said that despite voting for Miller in the past, the recent accusations of domestic violence and family abuse have made her reconsider her support.

“I don’t think I will,” Katie Heinz said when asked if she’d vote for Miller again. “Again, it’s kinda back to, there’s too much intermingling of exterior items that are affecting day-to-day. So like, what he’s got going on in his personal world, unfortunately, is gonna roll over into his day-to-day, and we need to get things done.”

Advertisement

The embattled congressman has been accused by his ex-wife, Emily Moreno, of a pattern of emotional and physical abuse towards her and their 2-year-old daughter, leading to growing calls for his resignation.

Earlier this month, the House Ethics Committee opened an investigation into the allegations against Miller.

Last week, Moreno, the daughter of Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), filed a lawsuit against the congressman for allegedly publishing an explicit photo of the couple’s daughter.

Miller has repeatedly denied the allegations against him.

Advertisement

Watch the full segment from NBC News’ Drive To Decision Day here:

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025