Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Burnham Boosts Labour Chances Of Fending Off The Greens

Published

on

Research Shows Burnham Boosts Labour Chances Of Fending Off The Greens
Research Shows Burnham Boosts Labour Chances Of Fending Off The Greens


6 min read

Andy Burnham will put Labour in a stronger position to win back voters it is at risk of losing to Zack Polanski’s Greens, new research for PoliticsHome has found.

Advertisement

The new nationwide survey, carried out late last month by the research organisation Thinks Insight & Strategy, also suggests that the prime minister-in-waiting will help shore up Labour’s right flank against Reform UK.

Ben Shimshon, co-founder and CEO of Thinks Insight & Strategy, said Burnham “definitely opens a window of opportunity” for Labour and “should give the party real hope”.

However, the findings also indicate that the public will expect Burnham to deliver change quickly after he enters Downing Street, which is expected to happen later this month.

The research is based on an online survey of 2,079 people between 24-25 June, alongside four focus groups with people who voted Labour at the 2024 general election but are now considering either the Greens or Nigel Farage’s Reform.

Advertisement

The fieldwork was conducted after both Burnham’s victory in the Makerfield by-election and Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s resignation announcement.

The results, shared exclusively with PoliticsHome, suggest that Burnham is currently well-placed to improve Labour’s electoral prospects as it tries to rebuild support ahead of the next general election.

Burnham will almost certainly replace Starmer in No 10 later this month after securing his return to the House of Commons in emphatic fashion in June.

Advertisement

Among those who voted Labour two years ago, a third (33 per cent) told the survey that a Burnham leadership made them more likely to vote for the party again next time around, while 12 per cent said it made them less likely.

The survey for PoliticsHome found that the former Greater Manchester mayor is particularly popular with 2024 Labour voters now considering the Greens, with 44 per cent of this group saying they were more likely to vote Labour with Burnham as leader. 

This is higher than any other group of Labour 2024 voters now considering other parties. 

Equal shares of 2024 Labour voters who are considering the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats (both 33 per cent) say they are likelier to vote Labour with Burnham as leader, as did 31 per cent of those now looking at Reform. Thirty-nine per cent of 2024 Labour voters who are currently considering Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain said they were more likely to stick with Labour under Burnham, though this was based on a small sample.

Advertisement

Thinks Insight & Strategy research for PoliticsHome

“For Labour, Burnham definitely opens a window of opportunity. Both 2024 Labour voters who are now considering Green, and, to a slightly lesser extent, those who are now considering Reform UK, are more likely than average to say that Keir Starmer’s replacement increases their chance of voting Labour. That should give the party real hope,” said Shimshon.

“But it also speaks to the tightrope Burnham needs to walk, as these voters have very different priorities, and want very different things from their government.”

He added: “Across the survey and in the focus groups, the hope is both low-definition and low-patience: voters don’t know much about ‘Andy’ – they like his vibes, his accent and his manner – but they’re not yet convinced he’s truly different.”

If, as expected, Burnham becomes the UK’s seventh PM in a decade later this month, he will be under pressure to deliver results quickly, the findings suggest.

Advertisement

Over half of respondents (54 per cent) said they would know within six months whether a new prime minister was doing a good job, and only 19 per cent said they would give them longer than that. Twelve per cent said they would know straight away. 2024 Green voters were the most patient, while Reform voters were the least patient.

Just over half of respondents (51 per cent) said that if Burnham is effective as PM, they would see real improvements within a year of him entering office, while 37 per cent said it would take at least a year or two.

Polanski
Thinks Insight & Strategy research found that 38 per cent of 2024 Labour voters who are considering the Greens say they’re more likely to stick with Labour with Burnham as leader (Alamy)

These results suggest that voters are willing to be less patient with Burnham than they were with Starmer when he first entered No 10 following Labour’s 2024 election victory.

In early July 2024, nearly two-thirds of people (62 per cent) told Thinks Insight & Strategy research for PoliticsHome that even if the Starmer administration was effective, “it will take a year or two before we start seeing improvement.” 

On a Burnham premiership, Shimshon added: “The direction of travel needs to be clear within 12 months, and whatever it is, that direction needs to feel like change.”

Advertisement

Thinks Insight & Strategy research for PoliticsHome

Farage and Reform have called on Burnham to call a snap election after becoming PM, arguing that he will not have a proper mandate to govern.

Even some on Burnham’s own side have said he should go to the country. Alan Johnson, the former Labour cabinet minister, has said the incoming PM should call a snap election because the mandate he’ll soon inherit was “gifted to him” by Starmer.

On the question of whether Burnham should call a snap election after entering Downing Street, public opinion broadly breaks down along party lines.

Overall, around a third (34 per cent) of people said that a new PM should call a general election as soon as possible after taking office. This was particularly pronounced among 2024 Reform (68 per cent) and Conservative (52 per cent) voters, while just 20 per cent of 2024 Labour voters agreed.

Advertisement

Nearly half of respondents (46 per cent) said the new PM should be bound by the 2024 manifesto, while 35 per cent said they should be free to break from it.

However, the same proportion (46 per cent) told the survey that Burnham must deliver change, even if it means breaking some promises made two years ago.

“In the abstract, voters cleave to the idea that the ‘right and proper’ thing to do is to stick to the manifesto (even though very few among the electorate will ever have familiarised themselves with it),” said Shimshon.

“What this shows is that, when it comes down to it, most voters would trade that off against seeing the change they so badly want actually happen.”

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Cats Could Help Our Brains Age Better, Researchers Say

Published

on

Cats Could Help Our Brains Age Better, Researchers Say

Owning a pet, be it a cat or a dog, has previously been linked to lower heart disease risk. This is especially true for cat owners aged between 40 and 64.

Our feline friends may also reduce stress and boost our mood.

As if they don’t do enough for us already, researchers from the University of Bath, Auburn College of Veterinary Medicine in the US, and École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse in France have said they might help us to age better too.

Why might cats help us to age better?

Advertisement

Their paper, published in the journal Biology Open, reads: “Pet cats may inform human ageing since humans and cats age similarly and they develop health challenges that mirror those observed in humans”.

Unlike a lot of lab animals, they added, cats tend to live long enough to develop age-related brain changes, like those seen in humans.

And, on the flip side, because they live a lot shorter lives than us, we can study their ageing at a much faster rate than we could in people.

The researchers used a biological model which looked at how multiple species age at a physical level.

Advertisement

They tracked 3,754 data points – like MRI (not CAT, sadly) scans, blood samples, and developmental milestones – gathered across human, cat, and other mammal species.

They found that cat and human brains seem to age remarkably similarly. Both species experience age-related neurodegeneration.

Like us, cats age in bursts. And they reach the equivalent of human old age: a teenage cat is the rough equivalent of a person in their 80s, ageing-wise.

“It was interesting to see that cats show patterns of age-related brain atrophy similar to those observed in humans,” said PhD candidate Brier Rigby Dames, who was involved with the research.

Advertisement

“These findings add to growing evidence that companion animals can provide valuable insights into ageing.”

Cat owners are increasingly requesting more detailed pet scans

Speaking to the University of Bath, the study’s co-author, Dr Ryan Gibson, said that more and more pet owners are sending their cats in for increasingly detailed scans as they age.

This, he said, might provide an exciting opportunity.

Advertisement

“This expanded clinical access creates meaningful opportunities for translational research (research that bridges the gap between scientific findings and healthcare), improving our understanding of aging and neurologic disease in ways that can benefit both feline and human patients,” he said.

For her part, Brier Rigby Dames said: “There’s potential to develop large-scale veterinary health databases for companion animals, analogous to human health databases such as the UK Biobank.

“These kinds of resources could enhance our ability to study ageing and disease using real-world clinical and owner-reported data collected across species.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

JD Vance Says ‘Something Is Very Broken In British Politics’

Published

on

JD Vance Says 'Something Is Very Broken In British Politics'

JD Vance has declared “something is very broken in British politics” as the UK prepares for its seventh prime minister in just over a decade.

The American vice-president said Britain “can do a lot more than it’s currently doing” to help its voters in a dig at the current prime minister.

Speaking two weeks before Keir Starmer is expected to hand the keys of No.10 over to Andy Burnham, Vance expressed alarm about the high turnover in Downing Street.

He said: “What that says to me is that something is very broken about British politics and that people are really crying out for significant structural change.”

Advertisement

He claimed he did not know much about the former Manchester mayor but added that the UK is “one of our closest and most important allies” and that the US administration would work with any new leader “as successfully as we can.”

Vance continued: “I hope that Andy Burnham – and if not Andy Burnham, somebody else – is able to deliver [change]. Because Britain is such a beautiful country, such an amazing place.”

Speaking on the 250th year of US independence, Vance claimed he is interested in the UK because of “reasons of mutual interest” and expressed hope that “whoever the prime minister is figures out how to get Britain back on track”.

“I also just care about it because Britain feels more culturally familiar to me than any country on Earth, aside from my own,” Vance said.

Advertisement

His words come after Donald Trump was significantly less diplomatic about Burnham.

The US president described him as an “extremely liberal” politician who “probably won’t open up” the North Sea for further oil and gas drilling.

He also called the former Greater Manchester mayor as “the mayor of a town”.

Burnham is yet to say what his approach to the mercurial president would be.

Advertisement

Starmer bent over backwards to forge a strong bond with Trump and even gave him an unprecedented second state visit to the UK.

However the two fell out after the prime minister refused to let the US use UK military bases to launch attacks on Tehran earlier this year.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Dissatisfaction In Nigel Farage As Reform Leader Climbs In Poll

Published

on

Dissatisfaction In Nigel Farage As Reform Leader Climbs In Poll

Dissatisfaction in Nigel Farage has increased over the last year amid growing scrutiny over his finances, according to a new poll.

Ipsos found almost two-thirds (63%) of Brits said they are “dissatisfied” with the Reform UK leader in June 2026 compared to 49% in June 2025.

That number far exceeds the number who are still satisfied in Farage – just 26% said they were happy with the Clacton MP this year, compared to 26% in 2025.

The findings come as the Clacton MP is under investigation for not declaring a £5 million donation from a crypto-billionaire shortly before he was sworn into parliament.

Advertisement

He insists he has not broken any parliamentary rules as the lump sum was not used for political purposes.

The Sunday Times has also revealed that Farage did not declare the support he received from convicted criminal George Cottrell prior to his election.

A Reform spokesperson replied: “Contrary to the story’s tone, no parliamentary rules have been broken.”

The party’s Treasury spokesperson Robert Jenrick also insisted on Sky News on Sunday that heightened scrutiny on Farage’s finances has not had an impact on their popularity.

Advertisement

Indeed, pollsters at Ipsos found 26% of Brits would vote for Reform if a general election were held tomorrow.

That means Farage’s party has held onto its comfortable lead in the opinion polls even during the heightened scrutiny.

However, Labour appears to have closed much of the gap behind Reform, and is just two points behind on 24%.

The party’s improvement in the polls comes amid speculation that Andy Burnham is going to take over from Keir Starmer.

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Robert Jenrick Furiously Clashes With Trevor Phillips Over New Farage Allegations

Published

on

Robert Jenrick Furiously Clashes With Trevor Phillips Over New Farage Allegations

Robert Jenrick locked horns with Sky News’ Trevor Phillips this morning while jumping to Nigel Farage’s defence.

Reform UK’s Treasury spokesperson shrugged off a new report from the Sunday Times, which claims Farage did not declare support from convicted criminal George Cottrell when he became an MP.

The revelation comes while Farage is still under investigation from the parliamentary watchdog for not declaring a £5 million donation from a crypto-billionaire prior to winning his seat in 2024.

The party insists Farage has not broken the rules in either of these scenarios.

Advertisement

But Jenrick furiously collided with Phillips on Sunday when the presenter asked: “Is Nigel Farage now becoming more of a liability than an asset to Reform?”

“Don’t be silly, Trevor,” he said.

Phillips hit back: “You’ve lost half a dozen points [in the polls], you can barely hear a word out of your leader, he’s keeping a low profile.”

“Nigel Farage is keeping a low profile?” Jenrick scoffed. “Nigel Farage is out and about across the country, he was out in America in the last couple of days meeting the US vice-president.”

Advertisement

“To remind you, he’s a British MP!” Phillips replied.

“He’s also someone who is a leading character – likely to be the next prime minister,” Jenrick said.

“You still have to deal with the lingering questions if you like about the character of the party and the leader,” Phillips reminded him.

Jenrick also said “there’s nothing to see here” about the Cottrell revelations, and insisted Farage is “not going anywhere”.

Advertisement

He claimed the media “seem fixated on Nigel” but that technique is “not working” as Reform continues leading in the polls.

“Why not? You just told me he’s going to be the next prime minister,” Phillips said.

After more back and forth, Phillips said he was “astonished” Jenrick thinks it does not matter who Farage associates with and their background.

The Newark MP also denied Reform’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf had publicly undermined him during a public spat earlier this year.

Advertisement

Jenrick told Sky in May that a foreign national would not be deported “exclusively” if they live in social housing under a Reform government.

But Yusuf replied on X: “Robert’s answer is not Reform policy.

“As the person responsible for our deportation plan I want to ensure people know where we stand: if a foreign national lives in social housing at taxpayer expense, they automatically fail our economic test and will be deported.”

However, Jenrick insisted on Sunday that he and Yusuf are “basically on the same page.”

Advertisement

“No, you’re at different ends of the book. He said you were wrong!” Phillips said.

Jenrick insisted: “No. We’re saying two important things here. We’re saying social housing, which is a precious commodity of which we’ve got too little in this country, should be for British citizens – and that’s what Reform would do.

“Secondly, if you’re in the UK and you’re not a Brit and you’re living in social housing, you will not be able to remain in it because you will not meet the economic test.

“You’ll be given three months to find private accommodation and if you can’t, then I’m afraid you will have to leave the country.”

Advertisement

“So no divisions in the top team? Or, as some cruel people say, he’s bullied you into a tougher position?” The presenter asked.

“No, none at all,” he said, insisting they are a united team.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

75 Minutes Of Running A Week May Lower Cell Age By 12 Years

Published

on

75 Minutes Of Running A Week May Lower Cell Age By 12 Years

You probably already know that running’s pretty good for us – it’s been associated with better heart health, stronger bones, better sleep, and improved mood.

It could even help us to live longer.

But how much running do we need to do to see benefits?

Well, it might be a lot less than you think – one study found that running about 10km a week led to roughly the same health advantages as jogging far longer.

Advertisement

And another paper linked less than an hour and a half’s worth of running a week to a biological age 12 years younger than non-runners.

Our biological age refers to the “wear and tear happening inside the body at a cellular and molecular level,” and is different to the years we’ve lived (chronological age).

How much running lowers your biological age by 12 years?

The research, published in 2023, found that 75 minutes of running or jogging a week was linked to a “biological age difference of approximately 12 years” compared to non-runners.

Advertisement

This appeared to stay true even after lifestyle and medical factors were taken into consideration.

The study looked at 4,458 US adults and measured their biological age by looking at their leukocyte telomeres.

Telomeres are structures that humans have at the ends of our chromosomes, and which keep our cells working better for longer. They tend to shrink when we age.

They have been compared to “the protective plastic caps at the end of shoelaces”. Shorter telomeres are linked to a shorter life.

Advertisement

Leukocyte telomeres are the telomeres at the ends of white blood cell chromosomes.

These have been used to gauge mortality risk in some groups, and are often chosen as a great indicator of biological ageing.

In this study, “The leukocyte telomere length difference between the non-joggers/runners and those who met the [exercise guidelines of 75 minutes of vigorous activity a week] accounted for a biological age difference of approximately 12 years in favor of the runners”.

More research is needed, however

Advertisement

This study didn’t see the same telomere length advantages in runners and joggers who didn’t reach 75 minutes a week.

This “could mean that jogging or running less than 75 min per week is simply not enough work to protect leukocyte telomeres and slow biological ageing,” the paper reads, adding that more research is needed.

Still, they said, “it appears that 75 min of vigorous activity per week achieved via jogging and/or running is a valid recommendation due to the finding that adults in this category had significantly longer telomeres than adults who did not engage in jogging or running”.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

How To Make Roman Gnocchi, The ‘Virtually Unknown’ Pasta

Published

on

How To Make Roman Gnocchi, The 'Virtually Unknown' Pasta

I love potatoes, so it makes sense that my favourite pasta has long been gnocchi.

The fluffy, pillowy clouds are especially delicious when made with extra-dry, floury spuds – chefs like a salt-roasted Maris Piper or King Edward for the job.

But writing for AllRecipes, chef John Mitzewich, also known as Chef John on his YouTube channel Food Wishes, said there’s a type of gnocchi that involves no potato at all.

He said: “I feel like I’ve eaten a fair amount of Italian food, and I’ve been to Rome, but it wasn’t until late in life that I discovered [this] virtually unknown [gnocchi recipe].”

Advertisement

He was talking about Gnocchi alla Romana, or Roman gnocchi.

What is Roman gnocchi?

They’re a kind of dough-based dumpling which are baked in a pan.

Roman gnocchi is usually made with semolina flour (the kind Mary Berry uses to make her roast potatoes and parsnips crispier), butter, milk, egg yolks, and Parmesan.

Advertisement

Some recipes use nutmeg, too – we’ve written before about how crucial the spice is to a lot of Italian dishes, even though it’s often ignored in savoury dishes in the UK.

This type of gnocchi is “much simpler to pull off than the classic potato gnocchi,” Great Italian Chefs’ site reads.

Rather than kneading, rolling, cutting, and shaping the dumplings, as you would with potato gnocchi, you simply spread Roman gnocchi’s mixture onto a tray before slicing and baking it.

It works as a comforting main or a low-fuss side (it’s delicious alongside a tomato-based sauce, too).

Advertisement

How do you make Roman gnocchi?

Like “regular” potato gnocchi, there’s no single recipe.

The ratio of semolina flour to milk, for instance, ranges from 1:4 in one recipe to just over 1:2 in another. Still, a higher amount of milk is more common.

And while some use the aforementioned nutmeg to season the dish, others use cayenne pepper, or nothing at all.

Advertisement

Some methods remain constant, however: cook the semolina flour like polenta in stove-hot milk before laying it on the tray.

Before you cook it, add another layer of tangy Parmesan, and if you like, cover it in melted butter too.

Roman gnocchi recipe

This should serve about 4.

Advertisement

Ingredients:

  • Milk: 630ml
  • Semolina flour: 150g
  • Butter: 40g (plus extra for the dish)
  • Grated Parmesan or Parmigiano-Reggiano: 60g (plus more for sprinkling)
  • Egg yolks: 1-2
  • Salt and nutmeg, to taste.

Tools:

  • Round cutter, like a scone cutter (or the floured bottom of a glass)
  • Baking-paper-lined baking tray
  • Grater, for the Parmesan
  • Nutmeg grater, if using fresh nutmeg
  • Heavy-bottomed pan, for the milk
  • Shallow baking tray or large oven-safe cast iron skillet, buttered to ensure the dumplings don’t stick.

Steps:

  • Simmer your salted milk, ideally with nutmeg, over a stove and whisk in the semolina.
  • Keep stirring until it comes together and begins to pull away from the sides of the pan. This should take about 10 minutes.
  • Remove the thickened mixture from the heat and allow it to cool a little before adding the egg yolks (stirring fast so it doesn’t scramble), all but a tablespoon of the butter, and 60g of the cheese.
  • Place the mixture on a baking-paper-lined baking tray (about 1.5cm deep), then let it cool. You might want to add clingfilm to the top of this and put it in the fridge, in which case it should take about 30-60 minutes to chill.
  • When you’re ready to bake the dumplings, preheat your oven to 180°C fan, 200°C conventional, or gas mark 4.
  • While it’s heating up, use a round cutter like a scone cutter (or the floured bottom of a glass if you’re stuck) to cut out circles from the semolina mix.
  • Layer these onto a buttered baking tray in overlapping circles.
  • Melt the remaining butter – a few seconds in the microwave in a suitable container will do – and drizzle it over the dumplings. Add the rest of the Parmesan.
  • Bake until golden (about 25-30 minutes).
  • Sprinkle more Parmesan on top before serving, if you like.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Farage ‘Unfit For High Office’ Amid Fresh Transparency Fears

Published

on

Farage 'Unfit For High Office' Amid Fresh Transparency Fears

Nigel Farage has been described as “completely unfit for high office” after a fresh report claimed he may have broken parliamentary rules by not declaring benefits from an ally.

The Sunday Times says the Reform UK leader received support, including security and social media staff, from George Cottrell in the year leading up to Farage’s election as the MP for Clacton.

Cottrell was convicted of fraud in the US back in 2017.

The newspaper alleged Farage also used a property rented by Cottrell near Buckingham Palace.

Advertisement

All MPs must declare gifts or benefits worth over £300 to parliament dating back to the year before they are sworn into the Commons.

The guidelines add that purely personal gifts or benefits do not need to be registered.

The revelation comes as the Clacton MP is already facing a parliamentary sleaze probe for failing to declare a £5 million donation from a crypto-billionaire shortly before he decided to run for parliament.

Farage has offered differing explanations for the lump sum. He initially claimed it was to fund security, then alleged it was a reward for Brexit campaigning and finally told the media it was “none of your business” and he could spend the money on “Ferraris” if he wanted to.

Advertisement

His team have argued “no parliamentary rules have been broken” over Farage’s association with Cottrell, either.

Responding to the new report, a Labour Party spokesperson said: “Nigel Farage and Reform are engulfed in a huge and growing scandal.

“It’s not going to go away, and trying to take the public for fools by saying it’s ‘none of your business’ won’t help.

“These new allegations of secret payments from a wealthy convicted criminal are on top of the ongoing scandal of his secret £5 million gift from a crypto billionaire.

Advertisement

“How much money has he been given, what did his donors get in return, and why has he tried to cover them up and avoid legitimate questions?

“Time and again Farage pretends to be on the side of working people.

“In reality he’s just in it for himself and can be bought by the highest bidder. He’s completely unfit for high office.”

Farage did register a £9,253 trip to Belgium in April 2024 donated by Cottrell, and added later a £15,276 donation for a US domestic flight from December 2025.

Advertisement

A spokesman for Farage hit back at the report, claiming: “It comes as no surprise that the Sunday Times has chosen to publish this baseless and contrived story, covering a period of time when Nigel Farage was not even an active politician let alone an elected one, given that the newspaper backed the Labour Party at the last general election.

“Contrary to the story’s tone, no parliamentary rules have been broken.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Health By Stealth: How To Improve Your Diet Without Noticing

Published

on

Health By Stealth: How To Improve Your Diet Without Noticing

In a recent report about the “fibre gap,” the British Nutrition Foundation (BNF) said that only about 4% of us eat the recommended 30g of fibre a day.

They added that the report identified “several priority areas for action,” including a “health by stealth” approach to improving people’s diets.

But what does that mean, and how can we achieve it?

Here, HuffPost UK spoke to Bridget Benelam, a nutrition scientist with BNF, about the term.

Advertisement

What is “health by stealth”?

It’s a way of making your diet better for you without you really noticing.

Benelam told us, “It’s mostly used to talk about industry reformulating products – e.g. reducing salt and sugar, or adding extra fibre to things like bread or pasta so that people get healthier food without having to change their habits”.

One example might be zinc added to breakfast cereals or flour enriched with folic acid.

Advertisement

These aren’t individual choices consumers consciously opt for – they come from policies or industry changes many of us never realise have been made.

But, the nutrition expert continued, “it’s a concept that could be applied at home by making small, manageable changes”, too.

If you want to consume more fibre, for instance, she said you could take barely-noticeable steps like “adding beans or lentils to every day dishes like bolognese sauce or curry, adding brawn to your usual white rice, [or] swapping white for 50:50 bread”.

You might be surprised by how far little changes can go. One study found that eating a meagre half-portion more of fruits or vegetables a day, when combined with minutes more sleep or exercise, could add a year to our life.

Advertisement

And while eating the recommended 30g of fibre a day is linked to an impressive array of health benefits, advantages start much sooner.

For every 7g of fibre you eat daily, you may enjoy an 8% reduction in bowel cancer risk, a 9% reduction in heart disease and heart attack risk, a 7% reduction in stroke risk, and a 6% reduction in type 2 diabetes risk.

That’s the equivalent of two slices of wholemeal toast.

Try “choice editing,” too

Advertisement

“Health by stealth” can involve adding nutrients to your diet you wouldn’t have otherwise. But it might also mean taking some foods away from easy reach, Benelam said.

“You can also do something that scientists call ‘choice editing’, where you make healthier choices more obvious and available – e.g. having veg ready prepared for snacks, having a fruit bowl in reach and either not having or putting less healthy foods out of sight/reach,” she suggested.

“It’s also something that parents could think about with kids meals to encourage extra fibre/veg.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Keir Starmer’s Warning For Likely Successor Andy Burnham

Published

on

Keir Starmer's Warning For Likely Successor Andy Burnham

Keir Starmer has issued a warning to his expected successor Andy Burnham over his approach to foreign policy.

The outgoing prime minister, who was dubbed “never here Keir” by his critics due to his frequent trips abroad, reminded the new MP for Makerfield that he will have to put the same effort into international relations.

He claimed internal issues, like the rising cost of living, are linked directly to the UK’s standing on the world stage.

Burnham, who is currently running uncontested to be the next PM, is expected to focus more on his domestic agenda when he gets into No.10 on July 20.

Advertisement

Speaking to the BBC, Starmer said: “If you’re prime minister and you care about what bills are going to be like in any part of the country, you have to care about finding a lasting solution to the situation in Ukraine, you have to care about what happens in the Strait of Hormuz.”

Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine meant European allies stopped buying Russia’s cheap oil exports.

Meanwhile, the US-Israeli strikes on Iran saw Tehran close the Strait of Hormuz, a major shipping lane which transports a fifth of the world’s oil supply.

A strain on international fossil fuels subsequently pushed prices up all over the world, including in the UK.

Advertisement

Starmer said he is “proud” that the UK has been a crucial part in dealing with both of these crises.

“I’m proud that the UK is now regarded as a leader, that other countries look to and want to engage with, and that is in our best interests here at home,” he said. “It’s not sensible to think we can just separate these two things out.”

He added: “The suggestion that in the modern era you could simply split up international and domestic… it just doesn’t make sense, it isn’t true, it isn’t right.”

“Whoever’s my successor is going to face the same global conflict,” Starmer continued. “We keep saying, and it’s true, we’re in a more dangerous and volatile world than we’ve been in for probably most of my lifetime. That’s not just a phase, that’s reality.

Advertisement

“That’s not going to change. And the domestic challenges aren’t going to change.”

Burnham has dodged a lot of scrutiny since winning a seat in parliament by not holding any press conferences.

He invited the public to ask him anything during a Reddit forum on Friday, where he said he would “100%” give the same amount of support to Ukraine as Starmer and wanted to continue his efforts to broker a closer EU relationship.

However, he did not answer any questions about his approach to Donald Trump.

Advertisement

Starmer has committed to staying on as MP for Holborn and St Pancras but promised to “keep my mouth shut” when his replacement takes over, adding that he has “always got on” with Burnham.

The outgoing prime minister had vowed to stay in post after Burnham won the Makerfield by-election last month, but – amid growing pressure from his party – U-turned three days later.

He told the BBC that it was a “really, really tough” decision, adding: “Taking the decision that your political career is over, it is an intensely personal matter, or at least it was for me. I wanted to do that with [my wife] Vic, and that’s what I did.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump’s Mocked After ‘Thieves, Radicals And Lunatics’ Line

Published

on

Trump's Mocked After 'Thieves, Radicals And Lunatics' Line

President Donald Trump on Friday railed against communism during a bizarre speech at Mount Rushmore.

But as critics were quick to point out, his definition of what “communists” do sounds a lot like what he, his family and his associates have been accused of doing since he returned to the White House last year.

“Our American ancestors did not shed their blood at Concord and Trenton, Gettysburg and Shiloh, Midway and Normandy, just so that a band of thieves, radicals and lunatics could come in and loot, pillage our nation,” Trump said days after financial filings showed he earned more than $2 billion last year.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board this week accused Trump and his family of “profiting off the presidency in ways that demean the office.”

Advertisement

Trump’s windfall includes more than $1 billion from his crypto businesses ― money he pocketed, while The New York Times reported that some 764,000 other crypto wallets suffered massive losses.

The president has also struck gold by buying stocks in companies just before his administration announces decisions favourable to those firms.

“The Trump clan is cashing in on the Presidency in big and sketchy ways,” the Journal said.

Meanwhile, Americans have been struggling with a spike in the inflation rate ― something Trump dismissed only last month.

Advertisement

I love the inflation,” the president insisted.

Trump’s speech was full of other lines about supposed “communists,” a word he is turning to with increasing frequency. The president has been falsely calling everyone who disagrees with him a “communist” as he tries to drum up Red Scare tactics. The move comes amid a deep plunge in his approval ratings and an increasing likelihood that his party will lose the House and possibly even the Senate in November’s midterm elections.

But it was his line about looting and pillaging ― which comes amid his own massive increase in wealth ― that had everyone pointing the finger right back at the president:

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025