Politics
Robert Jenrick Furiously Clashes With Trevor Phillips Over New Farage Allegations
Robert Jenrick locked horns with Sky News’ Trevor Phillips this morning while jumping to Nigel Farage’s defence.
Reform UK’s Treasury spokesperson shrugged off a new report from the Sunday Times, which claims Farage did not declare support from convicted criminal George Cottrell when he became an MP.
The revelation comes while Farage is still under investigation from the parliamentary watchdog for not declaring a £5 million donation from a crypto-billionaire prior to winning his seat in 2024.
The party insists Farage has not broken the rules in either of these scenarios.
But Jenrick furiously collided with Phillips on Sunday when the presenter asked: “Is Nigel Farage now becoming more of a liability than an asset to Reform?”
“Don’t be silly, Trevor,” he said.
Phillips hit back: “You’ve lost half a dozen points [in the polls], you can barely hear a word out of your leader, he’s keeping a low profile.”
“Nigel Farage is keeping a low profile?” Jenrick scoffed. “Nigel Farage is out and about across the country, he was out in America in the last couple of days meeting the US vice-president.”
“To remind you, he’s a British MP!” Phillips replied.
“He’s also someone who is a leading character – likely to be the next prime minister,” Jenrick said.
“You still have to deal with the lingering questions if you like about the character of the party and the leader,” Phillips reminded him.
Jenrick also said “there’s nothing to see here” about the Cottrell revelations, and insisted Farage is “not going anywhere”.
He claimed the media “seem fixated on Nigel” but that technique is “not working” as Reform continues leading in the polls.
“Why not? You just told me he’s going to be the next prime minister,” Phillips said.
After more back and forth, Phillips said he was “astonished” Jenrick thinks it does not matter who Farage associates with and their background.
The Newark MP also denied Reform’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf had publicly undermined him during a public spat earlier this year.
Jenrick told Sky in May that a foreign national would not be deported “exclusively” if they live in social housing under a Reform government.
But Yusuf replied on X: “Robert’s answer is not Reform policy.
“As the person responsible for our deportation plan I want to ensure people know where we stand: if a foreign national lives in social housing at taxpayer expense, they automatically fail our economic test and will be deported.”
However, Jenrick insisted on Sunday that he and Yusuf are “basically on the same page.”
“No, you’re at different ends of the book. He said you were wrong!” Phillips said.
Jenrick insisted: “No. We’re saying two important things here. We’re saying social housing, which is a precious commodity of which we’ve got too little in this country, should be for British citizens – and that’s what Reform would do.
“Secondly, if you’re in the UK and you’re not a Brit and you’re living in social housing, you will not be able to remain in it because you will not meet the economic test.
“You’ll be given three months to find private accommodation and if you can’t, then I’m afraid you will have to leave the country.”
“So no divisions in the top team? Or, as some cruel people say, he’s bullied you into a tougher position?” The presenter asked.
“No, none at all,” he said, insisting they are a united team.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Policy versus reality: The ‘DIP’ in British defence credibility
William Reynolds looks at the UK’s Defence Investment Plan and argues that the resources outlined match neither the commitments of the Strategic Defence Review nor the urgency of the challenges we face.
In February 2026, the UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned the Munich Security Conference that past leaders had “looked the other way, only re-arming when disaster is upon them”, and called for a rebuilding of “hard power…the currency of the age.” Fast forward four months, his Defence Secretary, John Healey, tendered his resignation, claiming the Prime Minister was “unable, and the Treasury unwilling, to commit the resources that the nation needs to defend the country”. The Defence Investment Plan (DIP), the Ministry of Defence’s response to the 2025 Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was not resourced to meet the agreed upon recommendations of the latter document. With the NATO conference in Ankara fast approaching, Britain risks having lectured for increased spending without producing the goods.
Drawing upon new research conducted with Prof Jamie Gaskarth and Dr Maeve Ryan, it becomes clear that this gap between rhetoric and reality undermines the UK’s credibility as a committed, ‘leading’ power to the NATO alliance.
The SDR itself suffered from a vague defence process, which led to a lack of clarity and prioritisation. The Review provided three general ‘Roles’ which defence was required to do– Role 1: defence of the UK and overseas territories; Role 2: successfully deterring and/or winning any fight which would occur in the Euro-Atlantic area; and Role 3: being able to shape the global security environment. Under the umbrella of ‘NATO First’, ensuring the UK “plans”, “thinks” and “acts” with NATO being the core priority in mind, these Roles are laid out for each military domain’s capabilities (Land, Sea, Air, Space and Cyberspace/Electromagnetic Spectrum) and focusses on the idea of ‘warfighting’ (fighting a peer enemy) and being able to deter a war from occurring in the first place. Examples are also provided for each, such as the Navy’s plan for ATLANTIC BASTION, a hybrid-fleet of crewed and uncrewed vessels protecting the Greenland-Iceland-UK maritime gap from Russian submarines; the British Army’s move towards a ‘Recce-Strike’ model for its land forces; and the Royal Air Force’s balance between crewed and uncrewed aircraft in its future.
The problem lies in a lack of clarity about what achieving these ‘Roles’ would mean in practice as a whole package. Role 2, defence of the Euro-Atlantic area, could range from a maritime-focussed defence of the ‘High North’ area to a doubling down on the British land-centric focus around the Baltic area. Both examples would fall under a ‘NATO first’ umbrella, but their geographical and political differences require significantly different capabilities and signal different priorities to different European states. The examples that were given are examples only, with no sufficient explanation as to how they fit into the wider armed forces’ force structure and priorities. Even with the late publication of the DIP, European allies remain unsure of British focus and current commitments, which stretch from Estonia to Iceland. Outside of some notable examples, no explanation of force structure, or specific numbers on formations and equipment have been provided. Contrast this with the Cold War, where the Defence Review of 1975 clearly defined British commitments around the ‘Four Pillars’ of defence, with a clear framework, outline of what the armed forces would look like going forward, and equipment numbers, from which allies could measure British efforts and focus.
This lack of clarity is compounded by the gap between government commitments and the resources allocated to achieve them. The 2025 SDR promised 2.6% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defence by 2027, with an “ambition” to reach 3% in the next Parliament. No expert looking at the recommendations and the resource envelope concluded this was possible. Providing a fully-kitted Carrier Strike Group, funding for the Global Combat Air Program with Italy and Japan, the AUKUS nuclear attack submarine replacement programme and two Divisions with a Headquarters to NATO’s Strategic Reserve Corps, alongside many other recommendations, was never going to be achievable at 2.6%.
To meet these requirements, the Ministry of Defence calculated that an additional £28 billion over four years, on top of the 2.6%, would be needed, with £18bn being the absolute floor for defence without requiring a reduction in the size and capability of the armed forces. For this reason, both John Healey and Al Cairns resigned, as the offered £10-13.5bn was far below even this threadbare requirement. The final increase was £15bn, still £3bn below the minimum threshold. How then the UK is expected to reach the agreed NATO target of 3.5% of GDP by 2035, which is predicted to require an extra £30bn a year, seems unclear. Indeed, the British Chief of Defence Staff noted recently that even more (3.5%) was necessary to “deliver the vision” set out in the SDR and agreed upon by the Prime Minister.
In 2021, the SDR’s predecessor, the Integrated Review, called for the UK to use its “convening power” to bring together partners to meet shared challenges. Britain has long played on its role as the leader of defence within Europe, but this is no longer the case. Germany, Poland, Norway and many others have significantly pushed their defence spending above and beyond 3% of GDP.
There is growing “frustration” with the UK’s rhetoric on defence. Despite regularly referring to itself as a leading European nation of NATO, the atrophy of the armed forces no longer reflects this. European defence firms and allies have noted the slowness of Britain’s translation of promises to reality. Whilst both NATO and the European Union have called for its members to be ready to deter or fight Russia by 2030, reportedly the UK currently sits at 31 of 32 on a NATO league table of rearmament. The spending gap will only deepen the issue.
Yet , despite the significant overstretch, successive governments has continued to reach for the armed forces as a preferred response to crises, setting commitments like de-mining in the Middle East, a possible Coalition of the Willing in Ukraine, alongside the vagueness of the SDR, without the commensurate resources to facilitate it. Indeed, the Prime Minister “disagrees” that said resources are required. The consequences are a stretched to breaking-point armed forces, unfulfilled promises and resulting loss of confidence from European partners in British defence capability. It is time political rhetoric matched reality. Either the UK accepts a reduced defence role in Europe, or it puts its money where its mouth is.
By Dr William Reynolds, Advanced Education Pathway (AEP) Lecturer in Defence Studies, Defence Studies Department, King’s College London.
Politics
Is Nigel Farage’s Career ‘Dead in the Water’ As Funding Questions Mount?
“Nigel Farage is dead in the water,” Piers Morgan boldly declared on the BBC last week.
The broadcaster said the Reform UK leader has been left “rattled” by the row over the undeclared £5 million gift he received from a crypto billionaire.
Farage received the huge lump sum just before he announced he was running in the general election back in 2024.
Though he insists he has not broken any rules, he is being investigated by parliament’s standards watchdog for not declaring the money when he was elected MP for Clacton.
If he is found guilty, Farage could even face a by-election if he is suspended from parliament for longer than 10 days.
But a senior Reform UK source told HuffPost UK: “If Labour are smart, they’ll suspend him for nine days, which would mean he’s guilty but wouldn’t trigger a by-election.
“If they’re daft enough to suspend him for longer, Nigel would easily win the by-election and could then just turn around and say voters don’t care about it whenever the £5 million gift gets brought up again.”
If that wasn’t bad enough, things got worse for Farage over the weekend.
An investigation by the Sunday Times revealed that the Reform boss received financial support from convicted criminal George Cottrell before he became an MP.
Farage has called it “an establishment hit job”, but could face yet another Commons sleaze probe after being reported by Lib Dem MP Josh Babarinde.
It is Farage’s reaction to the furore which has raised eyebrows among his political allies, as well as as enemies.
Not so long ago, it was virtually impossible to switch on the TV or radio without being confronted by Farage’s grinning face, while he was holding press conferences the length and breadth of the country on a weekly basis.
But since the Harborne story was broken by The Guardian in April, he has been noticeably more camera-shy.

And when he has made himself available for scrutiny, his explanation for the gift, and what he plans to do with his massive windfall, has been far from consistent.
At first, he said the funds were to be spent on his private security, then he claimed it was given to him as a reward for his Brexit campaigning.
On a round of car crash interviews two weeks ago, he insisted it was no one’s business but his, and he could spend the money on Ferraris if he wanted to.
Farage has also insisted that the money was unconditional, but he now faces the prospect of a second parliamentary probe over claims he lobbied the Bank of England to drop a cryptocurrency plan that could have impacted Christopher Harborne’s own business.
Farage denies any wrongdoing, but even his own supporters are concerned about the effect the various controversies are having on the Reform leader.
“Nigel is tired and stressed,” said one ally. “He needs to have a rest.”
As the party’s frontman, recent months have been especially punishing for Farage.
He led his party’s campaign in the May 7 elections, then the Makerfield by-election, which saw Andy Burnham comfortably defeat Reform’s Robert Kenyon.
That result confirmed that despite leading in the national opinion polls for the best part of two years, Reform’s electoral record has been decidedly patchy of late.
In February, the Greens’ Hannah Spencer defeated Reform’s Matt Goodwin in the Gorton and Denton by-election.
And last October, Plaid Cymru won the Caerphilly by-election for the Welsh Senedd, confirming that anti-Reform tactical voting is a major problem for the party.
This will once again be evident in the by-election for the Greater Manchester mayoralty at the end of July, which Reform insiders concede they are likely to lose to Labour.
Internal divisions risk rocking Farage’s party, too.
Tensions between senior figures have burst into the open, with home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf publicly slapping down Treasury spokesperson Robert Jenrick in May over Reform’s own immigration plans.
Some see that as a foretaste of the jockeying for position which would inevitably take place if Farage did decide to chuck it all in – a scenario he openly speculated on in a recent LBC interview in which he also refused to say he wants to be prime minister.
Former Reform chair David Bull said earlier this month that Farage is not bigger than his party, but few believe that it would be business as usual for Reform should he end up being replaced by one of his underlings.
It is far too early to write Farage off, however.
This is a man, after all, whose time in the public eye appeared to be over until he made the unlikeliest of comebacks by coming third on I’m A Celebrity … Get Me Out Of Here! in 2023.
His victory in Clacton in 2024 also followed seven previously unsuccessful attempts to get a seat in the Commons.
If there is one thing Farage is good at, it is defying the odds.
Who, for instance, would have thought he would successfully campaign to take the UK out of the European Union when he first emerged on the political scene as chairman of the UK Independence Party back in 1998?
In this week’s Commons People podcast, we examine the row threatening to bring down the Reform leader – and assess whether or not the end really is nigh for the comeback kid of British politics.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
How Does Sleep Help Our Muscles And Brains?
Most of us already know that getting enough sleep on the reg can reduce heart attack risk, make you more likely to exercise, and even help you live longer.
But working out exactly why that might be can prove difficult. In recent years, scientists have been looking more closely at the biological mechanisms behind sleep’s benefits.
And recently, a new paper published in the journal Cell identified a deep sleep circuit that might play a role in building muscle and improving our brain function.
The researchers discovered a feedback system that keeps certain hormones in check during sleep, too.
We now know more about how growth hormone is released during sleep
We’ve known for a long time that growth hormone, which is linked to stronger cartilage, muscle, and bone and an improved metabolism alongside a potentially lower heart disease and diabetes risk, is produced during sleep.
But we weren’t really sure how it was released.
In this paper, researchers looked at the brains of mice. They found that growth hormone-releasing hormone (GRGH) and somatostatin, which can suppress the hormone, both rise during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. That leads to a greater overall release of growth hormone.
During other parts of sleep, though, somatostatin dips while GRGH only rises a little.
Additionally, the scientists found a feedback mechanism in a part of the brain called the locus coeruleus, part of the brain associated with attention, sleep-wake cycles, and thinking.
When growth hormone slowly builds up during sleep, it begins to wake us up bu stimulating this brain region, the study found. But when a more sudden influx of the hormone comes, it seems to make us sleepier.
“This suggests that sleep and growth hormone form a tightly balanced system: Too little sleep reduces growth hormone release, and too much growth hormone can in turn push the brain toward wakefulness,” study co-author Dr Daniel Silverman said.
“Sleep drives growth hormone release, and growth hormone feeds back to regulate wakefulness, and this balance is essential for growth, repair and metabolic health.”
The hormone’s interaction with our locus coeruleus, which keeps us attentive and alert, might also explain sleep’s cognitive benefits, he added.
“Growth hormone not only helps you build your muscle and bones and reduce your fat tissue, but may also have cognitive benefits, promoting your overall arousal level when you wake up.”
Understanding this circuit could help us with treatments in the future
Researchers hope these findings can inform future therapies.
“Understanding the neural circuit for growth hormone release could eventually point toward new hormonal therapies to improve sleep quality or restore normal growth hormone balance,” Dr Silverman stated.
“There are some experimental gene therapies where you target a specific cell type. This circuit could be a novel handle to try to dial back the excitability of the locus coeruleus, which hasn’t been talked about before.”
Politics
Up next for the DSA? Two major swing states.
It’s hot outside. But the DSA is hotter.
Fresh off major primary wins in Colorado and New York, the Democratic Socialists of America is looking to prove that it can translate its momentum beyond deep-blue House primaries and into competitive statewide races.
DSA officials and allies told POLITICO they’ve already shifted organizers, volunteers and resources toward battleground Michigan and Wisconsin, where progressive Abdul El-Sayed is locked in a three-way Democratic primary for Michigan Senate and DSA-backed Francesca Hong is gaining steam in her primary for Wisconsin governor.
Both El-Sayed and Hong are planning a series of major rallies ahead of their primaries, and their campaigns and DSA organizers are currently discussing bringing many of the movement’s biggest stars — including recent winners from New York and Colorado — to generate attention and shore up the broader national effort. That will likely include a trip to Michigan for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who just made a major endorsement for El-Sayed.
“It’s DSA summer. We can’t stop racking up wins,” said Emma Vigeland, co-host of the long-running progressive program The Majority Report, who has campaigned for DSA candidates this primary season. “We’re seeing the culmination of 10 years of democratic socialism becoming more mainstream.”
Sustaining that summer momentum will be a tall task, as the DSA and the insurgent left try to harness the infrastructure they need to extend their wins into the battlegrounds.
But popular Twitch streamer Hasan Piker and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) are already planning to hit the trail to boost DSA picks in Michigan and Wisconsin ahead of the August primary.
And DSA membership has surged, according to national co-chair Megan Romer, with more than 7,500 new members signing up nationally since the sweeping victories in the Big Apple.
The DSA held a national members call Thursday night to rally the troops featuring two of the organization’s newest stars: Pennsylvania congressional nominee state Rep. Chris Rabb and Melat Kiros, who this week scored a major primary upset in Colorado over longtime Rep. Diana DeGette. Members also addressed Speaker Mike Johnson’s recent attacks on the group.
“This is a movement moment,” Hong said in an interview, pushing back on skeptics who question whether democratic socialists can win statewide in a state President Donald Trump carried twice. “More and more folks are recognizing that the system is rigged and they deserve a more democratic economy, where the power and control are with the workers and not the establishment, the elites and the mega corporations.”
The democratic socialist surge has been building since Sen. Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign brought the movement into the mainstream. But it’s been supercharged by progressive voters’ frustration with Democratic leadership, especially following former President Joe Biden’s late exit during the 2024 race and the party’s tepid response — in the eyes of many in the base — to the second Trump administration.
That anti-Washington sentiment has now resulted in DSA’s most successful primary season yet, putting democratic socialists on pace to have at least eight aligned members of Congress next year, not to mention the mayorships of New York City, Washington and Seattle — with more races still ahead.
But it hasn’t all been smooth sailing. In California, DSA-backed Sean Dougherty lost his blanket primary against Rep. Jimmy Panetta, while Chris Bennett fell short against Rep. Kevin Kiley, losses that point to a bigger question ahead: How far can the movement translate its surge of national attention and energy? Especially as establishment Democrats and outside groups look to blunt its momentum — and as Republicans ramp up efforts to turn the group into a campaign boogeyman.
“One of the biggest challenges of organizing is helping people channel their organic excitement — positive or negative — into movement growth,” Romer said. “We’ve built these structures and now we get to help people find their way into them so they can use them to win what they want.”
In Wisconsin, Hong is mounting one of the group’s clearest tests yet of whether a democratic socialist can win statewide, running on affordability and opposition to data center expansion — a message that has boosted her into a leading position in some polling heading into next month’s contest.
Public polling in the Wisconsin governor’s race has been sparse. A Marquette University Law School poll from March showed Hong leading the Democratic field at 14 percent among voters who named a candidate, ahead of Mandela Barnes at 11 percent, with 65 percent still undecided.
Hong, who last week appeared on Piker’s stream and raised over $50,000 from viewers in under an hour, says she plans to try unconventional ways of meeting voters heading into the primary.
“We will continue to be campaigning in creative ways, where people are meeting a candidate where they weren’t expected to meet a gubernatorial candidate — bike rides and dive bars,” she said.
Nearby Michigan is shaping up to be perhaps the most important state on the primary calendar this August for the strength of the insurgent movement in the Democratic Party. El-Sayed is not explicitly backed by DSA, but he’s widely viewed within the movement as part of the same progressive project, and organizers are going all in behind El-Sayed’s Senate campaign.
Ocasio-Cortez, who endorsed El-Sayed during his 2018 gubernatorial bid, joins Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who previously backed him in this campaign, in lining up two of the most influential voices on the left behind him.
“Everybody in the coalition is on the same page, whether it be Justice Dems, whether it be [Working Families Party], whether it be DSA,” said Vincent Vertuccio, Egret Strategies, a consulting firm that has worked with leftists running for office this cycle. He said Michigan is “absolutely the next focus of this national movement.”
Piker, who has become a highly sought-after surrogate for insurgent candidates this primary season, told POLITICO that he was headed to Michigan soon to rally support: “Abdul El-Sayed is not DSA affiliated, but he’s a progressive fighter. He’s a Berniecrat, and I’m excited to help him out to the best of my ability.”
A recent Quantus Insights poll from late June found El-Sayed leading Rep. Haley Stevens 41 percent to 36 percent, with state Sen. Mallory McMorrow trailing at 8 percent.
The DSA has another target in Michigan: Ousting incumbent Rep. Shri Thanedar, a former democratic socialist member whom the organization says it expelled over what it described as a “substantial disagreement with the values of DSA.” Thanedar at the time claimed he had renounced his membership, citing the organization’s promotion of a pro-Palestinian rally in New York City in the days immediately after Hamas’ attack on Israel in October 2023.
The representative now faces a DSA-backed challenger in state Rep. Donavan McKinney in Michigan’s 13th District.
Tlaib, an original member of the Squad, is working hard in her backyard to boost both McKinney and El-Sayed. In an interview, she said that the current momentum behind insurgent candidates reminds her of the 2018 wave that first brought her into Congress along with other Squad members, and their frustration once Democrats won unified control in the 2020 elections.
“Democrats had the trifecta and we couldn’t even get the Voting Rights Act passed. We couldn’t even get Build Back Better passed that was about child care and housing,” she said. “These are not years that we can get back for our residents, and especially our children.”
McKinney has hit Thanedar over taking corporate PAC money and questioned his progressive credentials. Tlaib and DSA are banking on their organizing efforts to propel the challenger to victory.
“[Mckinney] was raised in Wayne County all his life. He understands what it feels like to smell like rotten eggs when you go outside because the air is so polluted,” Tlaib added. “People are hungry for folks that will move with urgency.”
Politics
How Long Is The Odyssey? Christopher Nolan Film’s Runtime Confirmed
As soon as it was revealed that Christopher Nolan would be following up his Oscar-winning historical biopic Oppenheimer with a new adaptation of the classic tome, The Odyssey, it was pretty obvious that we were in for another bum-numbing epic from the British director.
Nolan is already known for not shying away from a long runtime with his big-screen offerings, with some of his biggest films clocking in at long after the two-hour mark.
Inception, for example, lasts a total of 148 minutes, with Tenet beating that by two minutes.
Another of his most popular movies, Interstellar, lasts just shy of three hours at 169 minutes, while his latest film, Oppenheimer, ran for three hours exactly.
So, how will The Odyssey compare?
How long will Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey run for?
The good news for anyone worried about whether they’re going to need bathroom and snack breaks when planning their cinema trip for The Odyssey is that the film isn’t quite as long as Oppenheimer.
However, it has to be said that it’s still one of Nolan’s longest movies to date, at 172 minutes in total, as reported by Ireland’s official film classification body, the IFCO.

What else do we know about The Odyssey so far?
Of course, it’s understandable that The Odyssey would be a long one, considering how much material there is for Nolan to condense into one film.
Based on Homer’s Greek epic, the original story centres around Odysseus and his mammoth journey home to his wife and son in Ithaca at the end of the Trojan war, where along the way he has to face adversaries from mythology like the cyclops and sirens.
Matt Damon will take the lead as Odysseus in the new film adaptation of the tale, sharing the screen with everyone from Anne Hathaway, Robert Pattinson and Tom Holland to Zendaya, Lupita Nyong’o and Charlize Theron.
The Odyssey is due to hit cinemas on Friday 17 July. Check out our more in-depth guide to the new Nolan film here.
Politics
Harry Styles Remembers Liam Payne As He Celebrates One Direction On Stage
Harry Styles took a moment to pay tribute to his former One Direction bandmates after wrapping up his epic, record-breaking run of shows at Wembley Stadium over the weekend.
On Sunday night, the chart-topping star delivered the 12th and final Wembley Stadium gigon his Together, Together world tour, off the back of his hit album Kiss All The Time. Disco, Occasionally.
During his London shows, Harry has been taking a moment to reflect on the early stages of his career, which was also the case during Sunday night’s concert.
“I wouldn’t be on this stage if it wasn’t for four friends of mine that were a massive part of this journey,” he told the crowd, before publicly thanking Niall Horan, Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik and his “dear friend”, the late Liam Payne “for these nights and everything that I learned in this time, the friendship, everything”.
“None of this would be possible, I wouldn’t be here without you, thank you so much,” he added.
Liam died in October 2024 at the age of 31, after falling from the balcony of a hotel where he was staying in Argentina, while under the influence of numerous substances.
In the days that followed, the four remaining members of One Direction issued a joint statement, which read: “The memories we shared with [Liam] will be treasured forever. For now, our thoughts are with his family, his friends, and the fans who loved him alongside us. We will miss him terribly. We love you Liam.”
They then posted more personal tributes on their individual social media accounts, with Harry remembering his “lovely friend” as “warm, supportive and incredibly loving”.
Harry lamented: “The years we spent together will forever remain among the most cherished years of my life. I will miss him always.”

David Fisher/Shutterstock
More recently, Harry admitted that Liam’s death was something he has “struggled” to address over the last two years.
“There was a period when he passed away where I really struggled with kind of acknowledging how strange it is to have people kind of own part of your grief, in a way,” the Sign Of The Times singer shared.
“I [had] such strong feelings around my friend passing away, and then suddenly, being aware [that] there [was] maybe a desire from other people [for] you to convey that in some way – or it means you’re not feeling what you’re feeling or something.”
The Grammy winner added: “It’s so difficult to lose a friend. It’s difficult to lose any friend, but it’s so difficult to lose a friend who is so like you in so many ways. It’s like, I saw [in Liam] someone with the kindest heart, who just wanted to be great.”
Politics
The woke warrior heading for Downing Street
The news that Andy Burnham has appointed James Purnell as his chief of staff has been greeted with horror by the likes of Owen Jones and Zack Polanski.
This is usually a good sign. Purnell’s past as a Blairite minister, pro-market stance and failure to despise Israel cast doubt, for them, on Burnham’s claim to be radical. Others might see this as a cause for relief. And what’s not to like about a man who once proposed, as Purnell did, lie detector-tests to weed out benefits cheats?
But just because the whiniest elements of the hard left loathe Purnell doesn’t mean his appointment is a good thing. For as smiley and reasonable as he appears, he embodies a problem with the modern left that’s every bit as pernicious as its economic incompetence. This is its obsession with imposing its fringe woke values on the rest of us.
If you want to know what makes Burnham’s new Svengali tick, forget the nearly two years he served as CEO of a global consultancy firm. Instead, look at what he did during his stint as one of the BBC’s top executives between 2013 and 2020, as both director of strategy and director of radio and education, when he championed the worst excesses of the diversity and inclusion agenda.
The climax of this stint was the publication in 2018 of an extraordinary report, ‘LGBT Culture and Progression’. It set out a detailed plan to transform the corporation and to force it to comply with the diktats of the LGBTQ+ lobby. Purnell oversaw the report and wrote the foreword. He applauded its recommendations, which he openly acknowledged were written with ‘support from Stonewall’. What could possibly go wrong?
The goal of this madcap project, believe it or not, was to stamp out ‘heteronormativity’ at the BBC. Apparently, it was a problem that the national broadcaster assumed heterosexuality is the default setting of human sexual orientation – even though it is. Where did Purnell imagine the BBC’s viewers came from?
In his foreword, Purnell argued ‘an organisation that appears to have a heteronormative culture’ would fail to attract 18- to 24-year-olds. What he failed to realise was that coming over all kinky and queer wouldn’t attract young people to the BBC either.
The joke is that the average age of a BBC One viewer at the time of Purnell’s report was 61. For BBC Two it was 62. Did he bother to ask viewers in their sixties if they fancied less heteronormativity with their BBC soaps? Did he heck.
In fact, the team behind the report didn’t canvass the opinion of anyone outside the BBC’s own buildings. Its recommendations were based exclusively on staff surveys run by the corporation’s in-house Pride group – which, as the report helpfully explained, represents anyone who is ‘genderqueer, bisexual, gay, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary, pansexual, intersex, asexual, queer, questioning or an ally’. The dinner party from hell, in other words.
With the blessing of Purnell, the demands of this tiny, unrepresentative bunch ricocheted through the BBC’s editorial output. One of the demands, for example, was for LGBT characters to feature more frequently and prominently in shows. If you want to complain about the endless succession of drag queens on your TV screen, Andy Burnham’s new chief of staff is your man.
Another demand was that staff should use preferred pronouns. This was taken by journalists as an instruction to respect the delusions of any crossdresser – even in news reports. Male rapists who claimed to be female would now routinely be referred to as ‘she / her’ by the BBC.
If you thought the age of the left imposing its fringe cultural obsessions on society might be coming to an end, then think again. Burnham’s most important hire is one of the worst kinds of cultural warriors. Let’s just hope James Purnell doesn’t get to do to Britain what he did to the BBC.
Malcolm Clark was LGB Alliance’s head of research from 2019 to 2022. Visit his Substack, The Secret Gender Files, here.
Politics
Australian Prime Minister Apologises For Kylie Minogue Comment
The prime minister of Australia has apologised for comments he recently made about one of the country’s most famous residents, Kylie Minogue, on a podcast.
Last week, Anthony Albanese was interviewed by comedian Nikki Osborne on the podcast Bush Deep, where the host asked if he would “shag, marry or date” the famous Australian entertainers Kylie Minogue, Nicole Kidman or Rhonda Burchmore.
Initially, Albanese tried to swerve the question, but eventually said “oh, Kylie, clearly” as a response to “all of the above”.
“She’s terrific,” he then enthused.
His responses were met with immediate backlash, with senator Sarah Henderson describing them as “disrespectful to women, embarrassing to Australians and demean the office of prime minister”.
Australian MP Zali Steggall also said the comments were “entirely inappropriate”, saying that Albanese “needs to learn to push back” and should have led “by example” and “call[ed the question] out as sexist”.
Responding to the controversy in a statement on Monday, Albanese said (as reported by BBC News): “I apologise unequivocally for the comments.”
Albanese is presently out of the country on an official visit, with Richard Marles acting as prime minister in his absence.
Speaking to Australia’s ABC Radio National about the media furore surrounding Albanese’s remarks, Marles said: “From time to time, we obviously do different interviews to the one we are doing now. But I think the other point to make here is that the government that the PM leads is the first in history that has had equality in terms of the number of men and women in cabinet.”
HuffPost UK has contacted Kylie Minogue’s representatives for additional comment.
Politics
Trump Slams UK’s ‘Weak Leaders’ Ahead Of Nato Talks
Keir Starmer is preparing for a dressing down from Donald Trump at his last Nato summit as prime minister over the government’s underwhelming defence spending plans.
The PM will fly to Ankara in Turkey a week after unveiling the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan (DIP).
Although it contained an extra £15 billion for the armed forces over the next four years, nearly one-third of it is unfunded, while there was no pathway for how the government plans to hit its target of spending 3.5% of national income on defence by 2035.
Starmer insisted that, once security spending is added, Britain will be spending 4.2% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defence by then.
But that would still fall short of Trump’s demand that all Nato allies increase defence-related spending to 5% of GDP by the middle of the next decade.
It’s therefore no surprise that, judging by his social media posts, the US president may already sharpening his knives as he prepares to meet the outgoing prime minister.
Trump reposted a tweet on his platform, Truth Social, over the weekend which attacked England’s supposed decline.
“Just 100 years ago, England was the greatest empire the world had ever seen,” the post, from an account called Geiger Capital, read.
“A few generations later, they are a deindustrialized welfare zone unable to stop third-world men from invading on rubber boats.
“Decline happens fast. Weak leaders and suicidal empathy.”
The same post also pointed out that Britain is on the cusp of appointing its seventh prime minister in a decade, with Andy Burnham preparing to replace Starmer in two weeks’ time.
Trump’s dig comes after months of turmoil in the UK-US relationship, triggered by Starmer’s refusal to let American troops use British military base to launch attacks on Iran.
Trump has already criticised the incoming PM too, describing Burnham – the former mayor of Greater Manchester – as “the mayor of a town” and “extremely liberal”.
The US ambassador to Nato Matthew Whitaker, has already hinted that the US president will be cracking the whip on his allies at the summit in Turkey this week.
In a thinly-veiled threat, he said: “Some allies are doing more than others.
“Poland, the North countries, the Baltic countries lead the way and Germany is on track for the 5%, reaching it in 2029, but many allies are lagging behind and President Trump expects all allies to step up immediately.
“We expect all allies to demonstrate meaningful upward trajectories both quantitively and qualitatively in defence spending that results in fairer burden sharing.”
Britain was Nato’s third largest defence spender in 2015 after the US and Greece, but last year it slipped down to 12th.
Burnham has vowed to “take my responsibilities fully” to fund the DIP if he gets into office.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
The House Article | If we cut the parliamentary education service, children will miss out

Image by: Guy Bell / Alamy
4 min read
Proposed cuts to the parliamentary education and outreach team risk reducing access to Parliament and increasing disengagement with politics
This year marks the 20th anniversary of the UK Parliament Teacher Ambassador Programme, an initiative that gives teachers across the country a chance to experience Parliament beyond a screen or textbook. This knowledge is brought home to inspire pupils, colleagues, and their wider community, and spark interest in our political system.
Yet, against the backdrop of this anniversary, there has been a proposal to cut the UK Parliament education outreach service and move toward more online provision – a move that risks reducing access to parliamentary education for rural and coastal areas like Cornwall.
For constituencies like mine in Truro and Falmouth, this outreach provision is vital. Some schools cannot get to Parliament – and those that can often struggle to secure places. Not long ago, students from King Charles Primary School in Falmouth were in London but were unable to get a slot for a tour of Parliament. I ended up meeting them at Millbank Pizza Express, which was not quite the visit I hoped the pupils from Year 6 would have.
This is not an uncommon experience for my area. If children from Cornwall are rejected for their parliamentary visit, then the six hour journey, minimum two night trip to the capital becomes simply unaffordable. And those children, many of whom will have never been to London, will miss out.
Currently, the South West has a regional outreach officer who plays an important role in connecting people with Parliament. Last year alone, they worked with 20,000 children and 780 adult learners, including Youth Parliament members, SEND learners, English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) learners, young people not in education, employment or training (Neets), and other communities often underrepresented in democratic participation.
For constituencies like mine in Truro and Falmouth, this outreach provision is vital
The team has helped facilitate several non-partisan politics summer schools for MPs across the region, including my own in 2025, and they will support me again this summer. At my last politics summer school, the outreach officer taught 23 young people from Truro and Falmouth about how Parliament works, how laws are made and the traditions and procedures that underpin our democracy. This sort of outreach feels more important than ever as discussions around votes at 16 continue and efforts are made to engage those who might otherwise feel disengaged.
Having worked in schools, I know that online provision doesn’t effectively replace in-person engagement. The outreach team already delivers digital sessions, yet in-person engagement is categorically favoured, with digital uptake accounting for less than five per cent of total delivery. This work requires a unique skill set, and I have seen how much it helps young people to participate in an objective and helpful way – something of great value in a politically divisive time.
Communities closer to Westminster already benefit from greater access to Parliament, so it seems counterproductive to cut regional staff while retaining a small Westminster-based team. Those of us who are more than 200 miles away are not only physically distant but often socially disconnected too. It risks creating more unequal opportunity, something rural communities know all too well. The education team are changing the rules this summer so that schools from remote areas will be able to apply early for visit places and this cannot come soon enough. But if there is also any way of increasing visit capacity I know it would be immediately filled.
This is about protecting democracy and ensuring access and opportunity wherever people live. I am concerned how areas situated far from Parliament will be considered and how the loss of in-person services will affect SEND schools, those with disabilities, and those facing digital exclusion. Parliament belongs to everyone, and everyone should have the opportunity to properly engage with it, whether that’s through a visit to Westminster or outreach in their own community. I understand the limitations of cost – but I would hate to see this diminished.
Jayne Kirkham is Labour MP for Truro and Falmouth
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: High Hopes
-
Politics3 days agoThe House | “Reframing the debate from a binary discussion of winners and losers”: Yuan Yang reviews ‘We Are Not Machines’
-
Crypto World6 days agoStrategy authorizes up to $1.25B in Bitcoin sales under new capital plan
-
News Videos6 days agoHow to Build INSANE Live Financial Dashboards With Claude
-
Tech6 days agoAnonymous researcher drops 0-day ‘exploitarium’ repo
-
Business6 days agoAustralia treasurer says alleged access of prime minister’s bank data ’incredibly concerning’
-
NewsBeat1 day agoTaylor Swift and Travis Kelce wedding staffer hilariously struggles to keep her cool while checking in megastars
-
Crypto World5 days agoAirdrop Registration Becomes Key Focus For Remittix As RTX Launch Updates Approach
-
Sports5 days agoBroncos roster: OL Ben Powers (No. 74) entering final year of contract
-
Business7 days agoThe AI boom won’t burst all at once. It will pop in ‘rolling bubbles’: Macquarie
-
Crypto World4 days agoBinance stock trading tops $1B in first month after launch
-
NewsBeat6 days agoPresenter Caroline Flack’s brother Paul Flack dies aged 55
-
Crypto World4 days agoAlibaba-affiliate Ant Group enters the humanoid robot market with 12 deals
-
NewsBeat4 days agoNew exhibition reflects five decades of movement between island of Ireland and GB
-
Crypto World21 hours agoSouth Africa proposes crypto tax guidance under existing rules
-
Crypto World3 days agoStandard Chartered Secures MiCA License as ESMA Adds 37 New Crypto Firms
-
Tech24 hours agoLenovo laptops are now shipping with YMTC SSDs, a sign of Chinese NAND entering the mainstream
-
Business5 days agoMeta Platforms Stock Jumps 7% Today as Bloomberg Reports Company Plans to Enter the Cloud Business
-
Business3 days agoWhat a 10 Percent Drop Means for Buyers, Sellers and Renters
-
Crypto World4 days agoBinance Re-Enters Philippines As EU MiCA Rules Restrict Access

You must be logged in to post a comment Login