Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Counter-Terrorism Police Now Leading Investigation Into Ann Widdecombe’s Death

Published

on

Counter-Terrorism Police Now Leading Investigation Into Ann Widdecombe's Death

Counter-terrorism police are now leading on the investigation into Ann Widdecombe’s suspected murder.

It comes after a 28-year-old white British male was arrested in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, on Saturday in connection with her death.

Police previously said there was “nothing to suggest” Widdecombe’s death was politically-motivated.

The former Tory minister and later Reform UK spokesperson was found dead at her home in Hayton on Dartmoor on Thursday following sustaining serious injuries.

Advertisement

In a statement on X, home secretary Shabana Mahmood said: “Following new information and evidence, they are now leading on the investigation into the horrific murder of Ann Widdecombe.

“The police are pursuing multiple lines of enquiry to establish the motivation for this attack.

“I will be updating the House further this afternoon. My thoughts today remain with Ann’s family and friends, and all those who loved her.”

Counter Terrorism Policing South East also confirmed in a statement: “The man in custody has since been re-arrested on suspicion of commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.”

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

The 9 Best Carry-On Suitcases That Fit In The Overhead Locker (Even On Ryanair)

Published

on

Peak Design/ Away suitcases

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

When did taking a checked bag on an airplane get so expensive? At some point in the last few years, airlines have found a way to charge us for basically existing anywhere in the vicinity of an airport, as if going on holiday wasn’t expensive enough…

That means, if you want to take even a fraction of your toiletry bag, you’re likely to end up paying through the nose for checked baggage.

Advertisement

If you’re not in the business of spending more money than you need to to get where you need to go, you might prefer to take a carry-on suitcase instead.

To make sure you have a container that doesn’t drive you insane when you embark on your next trip, we’ve rounded up the best carry-on and cabin suitcases in the UK right now.

How we tested the best carry-on suitcases

Peak Design/ Away suitcases

Amy Glover/ Honey Jane Wyatt

Peak Design/ Away suitcases

To make sure we’re only recommending the best of the best suitcases, our shopping writer enlisted the help of the HuffPost UK team to test out different kinds of carry-ons.

Advertisement

For each suitcase tested, we looked out for features like durability, zip strength, size, compartment options, compression, expansion zips, locks, and wheel smoothness.

We also considered whether cases fit UK airlines’ carry on guidelines and if they came with a warranty.

The 9 best carry-on suitcases in 2026

Best large carry on

If it makes you normal to be able to pack the right amount, call me weird, because I’ve never done that in my life.

Advertisement

That’s why this big (and expandable) carry on from Away is calling my name: it can hold up to 10 outfits, and comes with a flex feature that unlocks an extra 6cm on space.

Beware though, you might need to upgrade to a checked bag when it’s expanded, so make sure you check with the airline first.

Dimensions: 57.7 x 39.2 x 24.4cm
Weight: 3.9kg
Warranty: Lifetime.

Best hybrid carry on

This case might look like it has a squishy exterior, but that is in fact a rigid frame packed with a super-thin felt-lined interior so you have even more packing space.

Advertisement

The outside is home to a quick access pocket, filled with its own teeny pockets (meta) to keep everything in its place. Meanwhile, the larger compartment is held in place with a drawbridge-style strap unlike any other we’ve ever seen to keep your things visible and stationary.

Its 360 spinner wheels and comfy handle don’t hurt, either, according to our lifestyle writer, who praises its expansion zip that adds more space for when you pick up souvenirs on holiday (or even just at the airport).

Dimensions: 55.6 x 35.6 x 23cm
Weight: 3.9kg
Warranty: Lifetime.

Best hard shell carry on with a pocket

If there’s one thing we’ve lost in all of this push for protecting our possessions, it’s the ability to quickly grab something from a front pocket.

Advertisement

Should you be the type who isn’t keen on taking extra bags on board a flight, this stylish carry on from Carl Friedrik has its very own front pocket so you can grab your essentials from it on the go.

The polycarbonate outer shell will make sure nothing gets bumped on your journey, while two sets of compression straps inside keep everything nice and snug.

Dimensions: 56 x 38 x 25cm
Weight: 4.7kg
Warranty: Lifetime.

Best lightweight carry on suitcase

If you’re anything like me, you’ll want to pack to max capacity without harming your arms when you go to lift your case into the overhead locker.

Advertisement

Luckily for you, Bondi has created a super lightweight carry-on set with all the features of a heavier one. The set up inside is pretty standard, but it does come with a detachable mesh wash bag so you can keep all your toiletries snug throughout your journey.

If this panna cotta yellow isn’t doing it for you, it also comes in a range of other shades – some as fun, and others more muted for the minimalists reading.

Dimensions: 56 x 36 x 20cm
Weight: 2.4kg
Warranty: 10 years.

Best glossy luggage

If there’s one surefire way to be able to spot your luggage in the overhead locker, it’s when it’s shining down at you. This glossy case from HORIZN uses German engineering to make it the best of its kind.

Advertisement

Not only does it come with premium features like 360 spinner wheels, a telescopic handle that locks at your perfect height and a TSA lock to keep your belongings safe, but the two inner pockets are guarded by mesh panels, so you won’t have one side with stuff falling around.

Dimensions: 55 x 40 x 20cm
Weight: 2.9kg
Warranty: Lifetime.

Best expandable suitcase

Who knows what kind of delights you’ll encounter on holiday that you’ll want to bring home with you? If you’re looking for an excuse to do some shopping, this carry-on lays the groundwork for a spending-filled trip, as it has an expandable zip that increases its capacity.

The inside is filled with one large compartment, held down by a Y-shaped compressor strap, while the other compartment is held down by a separator with three mesh pockets to fit all your knick knacks.

Advertisement

And, as with all Antler cases, it’s protected by a lifetime warranty, in case the combination lock and coil zips fail you at any point over, well, the rest of your life.

Dimensions: 55 x 36 x 23cm
Weight: 2.8kg
Warranty: Lifetime.

Best budget suitcase

Travel can be expensive but your luggage doesn’t have to be. If you’re not trying to break the bank on the thing that merely holds your clothes, this suitcase from Dunelm is the value for money you’ve been looking for.

It’s super lightweight, so you’ll have no probem getting it into the overhead locker no matter how much you overpack. With four spinner wheels, it’s easy to manoeuvre, and it even has a handy side handle so you can convert it into a briefcase-style bag if you’re not into the sensation of dragging something along a pavement.

Advertisement

Dimensions: 55 x 40 x 20cm
Weight: Not stated
Warranty: None.

Best for long journeys

Look, we’re not just including this case because it’s pink (although that’s at least part of the reason) but also because if you’re a frequent traveller, this is the case for you.

Loaded with a removable battery pack that can charge your phone and your laptop, this carry-on will save you from spending your whole journey worrying you’re not going to be able to order your Uber at the other end.

But it’s not just that that will make your life easier. As well as being almost completely silent, the wheels glide along like a cloud in the sky, and the entire exterior is reinforced with an aerospace-grade shell so it can withstand bumps on the road – or even in the sky.

Advertisement

Dimensions: 55 x 38.5 x 21.5cm
Weight: 3.4kg
Warranty: Lifetime.

Best for Ryanair

If you’re travelling on a budget, it can be tricky to walk the line between a case that fits more than a literal shoe and going over the travel allowance. This one from Tripp is *just* the right size for the Ryanair guidelines, so you won’t be stuck with any annoying fees to kick off your holiday.

After unclipping the padlocked zips, you’ll find two compartments – one with a mesh cover and the other with X-shaped packing straps – to keep everything in place.

While the original size alone is more than spacious enough for a week’s worth of belongings, you can also unzip the extra zip to make it big enough to hold all the keepsakes you’ll inevitably pick up on holiday (if you’re anything like me, that is…).

Advertisement

And, most importantly, the hard outer shell makes it sturdy enough to last for years, according to our audience editor. It even comes with a five-year guarantee.

Dimensions: 65 x 45cm
Weight: 2.7kg
Warranty: 5 years.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Physical Activity Guidance Update: New Rules For UK Adults

Published

on

Physical Activity Guidance Update: New Rules For UK Adults

For years, institutions like the World Health Organisation and the NHS have recommended 150 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise, or 75 minutes of higher-intensity activity, a week.

This has been linked to slower brain ageing, a reduced risk of some cancers, and better overall physical and mental health.

But while the UK government’s recent update on its chief medical officers’ physical health guidelines recommends “that all individuals work towards achieving these guidelines,” it adds, “they are not absolute thresholds”.

Some research suggests that over a third of UK adults fail to reach those recommendations.

Advertisement

The updated guidance doesn’t mean 150 minutes of exercise is an incorrect or ineffective benchmark. Instead, it reflects the usefulness of small increases in activity among those who find the existing suggestions intimidating.

“We recognise the benefits that can be achieved at levels both above and below 150 minutes per week,” the update reads.

“If physical activity were a drug, we would refer to it as a miracle cure”

The foreword to the new guidance said that if exercise were a drug, we’d see it as a “miracle cure” due to how effective it can be at treating, delaying, or even preventing diseases like coronary heart disease, stroke, dementia, diabetes, breast cancer, bowel cancer, arthritis and depression.

Advertisement

Proof of exercise’s benefits has only gotten stronger since the first chief medical officers’ guidelines on physical activity, they added.

For instance, we know that “the health benefits of physical activity are significant when we go from no activity to even some activity,” the guidance reads.

Indeed, recent research shows that two minutes more exercise a day can contribute to a longer life, especially if you weren’t doing much beforehand.

Another study found that four 15-minute walks spread across the week could boost longevity among older people.

Advertisement

A quarter of an hour of vigorous physical activity a week has been associated with a significantly lower risk of heart disease, cancer, and early death, too – even if it’s broken up into two-minute segments.

“There is clear evidence that even small increments such as taking the stairs rather than the lift, or walking to the shops, can make a surprisingly large difference to our long-term health and wellbeing if they become part of normal life,” the updated guidance said.

These health benefits do build the closer we get to the 150-minute mark (they tend to taper off after that point).

But it’s important not to be “put off if you think you cannot make 150 minutes – make a start and see how you go. Every extra bit will benefit you”.

Advertisement

What do the new exercise guidelines for adults say?

It says adults should still try to complete 150 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75 minutes of high-intensity activity a week, though again, some activity is far better than nothing.

We might benefit from “even shorter durations of very vigorous intensity activity” than 75 minutes a week, meanwhile. A combination of intense, moderate, and very intense exercise is a great aim too.

The guidelines also encourage at least two strength-training sessions a week for adults, “but any strengthening activity is better than none”, and suggest incorporating balance training into your routine.

Advertisement

Don’t stay sedentary for extended periods of time, and “break up long periods of inactivity with at least light physical activity,” too.

The revised guidance for older adults (65+), meanwhile, “give[s] greater emphasis to regular light activity” and has removed the previous suggestion to ensure these sessions lasted at least 10 minutes.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Reform deputy reposts alleged sex trafficker’s post on Ann Widdecombe

Published

on

Richard Tice of Reform UK and Tristan Tate and Andrew Tate

Richard Tice of Reform UK and Tristan Tate and Andrew Tate

Richard Tice, Reform UK’s deputy leader, is among those promoting the views of an alleged human trafficker on social media.

In the aftermath of Ann Widdecombe’s death, many right-wingers have sought to politicise the alleged murder despite facts being thin on the ground.

This includes the lesser-known Tate brother, Tristan.

A photo of Tristan Tate's X post that shows it was 'reposted' by 'Richard Tice MP'. Full post: A respected member of Reform UK has been brutally murdered in her home. A defenceless elderly lady. And yet we are told that the right wingers are the violent ones by the left wing liberal media. A true symptom of these troubling times."

Richard Tice unfazed by Tate’s history

Tristan and his brother, Andrew Tate, are facing serious accusations in Romania and the UK. On 6 July, Romania Insider reported:

Advertisement

Prosecutors from Romania’s Directorate for Investigating Organized Crime and Terrorism, or DIICOT, announced on Friday, July 3, that they have expanded the investigation into brothers Andrew and Tristan Tate with new charges. The announcement comes after another expansion of the case, made public by DIICOT last month, regarding money laundering and human trafficking.

In total, in addition to the accusations of human trafficking and rape, which formed the basis of the 2024 case, prosecutors have added money laundering, influencing statements, removal from seizure, and complicity in the trafficking of minors to the list of offenses. The case now involves two case files.

The BBC had previously added:

The brothers will face charges in the UK, including rape and human trafficking, when they are extradited from Romania after legal proceedings against them there conclude.

The accusations against the Tate brothers are well known. As such, it beggars belief that Reform’s second-most senior politician would promote such a character. It’s sadly not surprising, though, as Reform politicians have a terrible track record on this front.

This is despite Farage & Co’s attempts to paint themselves as ‘protectors of women’ — particularly in relation to the various ‘rape gang‘ inquiries.

Unsettling behaviour

There’s a grim irony here, of course, in that Tice is promoting a man who’s accused of crimes against women to speculate about the alleged murder of a woman.

Advertisement

Tice and the rest of Reform are engaging in this speculation despite Widdecombe’s family asking them not to.

Reform-linked journalist scolds Ann Widdecombe’s family

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

By Willem Moore

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Downing Street Rejects Zia Yusufs Claim On MPs Safety

Published

on

Downing Street Rejects Zia Yusufs Claim On MPs Safety

Downing Street has rejected Zia Yusuf’s claim that the government does not “care at all about the security of Reform MPs”.

The right-wing party’s home affairs spokesman also pointed the finger at parliament and the police following the death of Ann Widdecombe.

Commons officials have already hit back at Yusuf’s comments, which he made in a post on X on Sunday.

He said: “The state is providing no protection whatsoever. In fact, based on what I have seen in the last 48 hours, none of the government, the Speaker nor the police care at all about the security of Reform MPs.

Advertisement

“Several of our MPs have written to the above in recent months about distressing, escalating security concerns, asking for help. Their correspondence was not even replied to. I will let you draw your own conclusions from this.”

Asked about Yusuf’s claims, Keir Starmer’s spokesman said: “It’s absolutely paramount that MPs can go out there in the wider world safely and freely.

“There is a rigorous and proportionate security system in place to ensure the safety of MPs and ministers.

“As you’d expect, we keep this under constant review to ensure it is able to adapt and evolve to ever-changing threats, and the Parliamentary Security Department, police and Home Office teams work in close co-ordination to assess risk and provide comprehensive protective security measures.”

Advertisement

A House of Commons spokesperson hit back at Yusuf by insisting “all MPs are offered appropriate security measures”.

“Any assessment of an individual MPs’ security arrangements or advice is subject to a rigorous risk-based assessment, conducted by security professionals and with input from the police and a range of professional authorities,” they said. “These are naturally kept under continuous review.

“All MPs are offered appropriate security measures but we do not comment on specific cases or details of those measures so as not to compromise the safety of MPs, parliamentary staff or members of the public.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

David Beckham Responds To Victoria’s Viral World Cup Reactions

Published

on

Victoria wasn't quite as jubilant as the rest of her family on Saturday night

Sir David Beckham has responded to one comedian’s send-up of his wife Victoria’s less-than-animated reactions to watching the England football team playing over the weekend.

On Saturday night, Sir David and Victoria were joined by their youngest three children, Romeo, Cruz and Harper Beckham to see England’s latest World Cup game, where the squad triumphed over Norway.

While the rest of the Beckhams couldn’t hide their joy at England’s success, it’s fair to say that, true to form, the former Spice Girls star’s reactions were a touch more muted.

“I wanted to take a moment to single out England’s number one fan Victoria, Lady Beckham!!!!” the comedian Jenny Johnson wrote on Instagram the following day.

Advertisement

“There’s nothing like cheering your heart out for England from home, then they cut to Victoria and we see that classic Posh Spice smile! It’s so infectious!”

Jenny quipped: “I used to think I got animated while watching sports, but Victoria blows my enthusiasm out of the water! Each time I see her I shout, ‘SPICE UP YOUR LIFE!!!!’ because her energy is electric!!!”

“See for yourself!” she added, alongside a series of stoic-looking pictures of Victoria.

Within just a couple of hours, Sir David had popped up in the comments, joking: “She was celebrating inside I promise. Her reactions were slightly slower than mine.”

Advertisement
Victoria wasn't quite as jubilant as the rest of her family on Saturday night
Victoria wasn’t quite as jubilant as the rest of her family on Saturday night

Mark Large/ANL/Shutterstock

Back in 2019, Victoria claimed that “not smiling publicly” was a type of “armour” that she hid behind, an idea she elaborated on in her self-titled Netflix documentary last year.

“I’ve looked miserable for all these years because when we stand on the red carpet, this guy has always gone on the left,” she told viewers, referring to her famous husband.

“Now I didn’t realise that when I smile – which I do! – I smile from the left, because if I smile from the right, I look unwell. So, consequently I’m smiling on the inside – but no one ever sees it. So, that’s why I look so moody.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The IOF’s rampage in Lebanon’s rural south

Published

on

The IOF’s rampage in Lebanon’s rural south

Much of the economy south of Lebanon’s Litani river is generated by some of the most fertile and productive land in the region. It is famous for olives, avocados, bananas and citrus fruits. It is also the area most torn apart by fighting with the Israelis since 1982.

The district of Sour is particularly rich in agricultural resources. It was here that we met with Mohammed el-Hussaini, a spokesman of the Syndicate of South Lebanese Farmers.

He explained how the latest war, which started in October 2023, derailed the end of the olive harvest and made preparations for the following year impossible. He also described how the IOF are embarking on an orgy of thieving, vandalism and intimidation, causing deliberate, vindictive and long-lasting damage to the rural economy.

Chemical warfare

One such tactic, which is illegal under international law, is the use of white phosphorous. It is a chemical compound used by the Israelis to burn crops, dwellings and wooded areas within the zones where they operate. It also has a lasting environmental impact on the land where it is deployed.

Advertisement

In a more sinister development, it was recently used as a chemical weapon against agricultural labourers. A video of the workers fleeing the trademark white clouds that this compound produces has gone viral across the region.

Mohammad said:

Those farmers were hit by white phosphorus during the harvesting of watermelons. They were a few hundred metres from an Israeli checkpoint, and they were outside their line of control. The IDF saw them collecting the watermelons and they attacked them.

The Israelis are well known for deploying this illegal weapon across areas where they are being held back by local fighters. But using it against labourers, harvesting their produce during a ceasefire, represents a new low.

Another tactic of the occupiers is the deployment of herbicides to clear the vegetation in their so-called buffer zone. Mohammad continued:

Advertisement

They have used glyphosate – the herbicide that kills weeds by stopping the photosynthesis. The density that they used was 30 times more than is allowed, to ensure that they killed everything that is green – the plantations and the forests, including the areas where wild animals live. We have videos showing how they used planes to spray this herbicide.

The use of glyphosate in such a concentrated way amounts to ecological terrorism. It is a chemical agent that is already controversial when deployed within its recommended guidelines, and its use is heavily restricted in some countries and banned outright in others.

Studies suggest that it causes cancer, and contaminates the environment. Its use, in illegal doses, is a tactic that has long been witnessed in the border areas of Gaza where the IOF claim to be terraforming the land for security reasons. But in reality, they are trashing the food security of the Palestinians. A genocidal tactic that is now being imported to south Lebanon.

Aside from the chemicals, more familiar means have been used to destroy Lebanese land and inhibit the return of its people. The infamous D9 Bulldozers have been deployed into IOF controlled zones to destroy homes and plantations. There is also a growing body of evidence to suggest that non-military contractors from Israel are being commissioned for this and other tasks.

Wholesale demolitions

It is already confirmed that Israeli civilian companies are involved in the demolition of border villages. There is also verified evidence of systematic looting from residential south Lebanese properties by IOF soldiers.

Advertisement

Mohammed says there are now multiple testimonies saying that other outside contractors are being used to steal the resources of occupied rural areas:

We have olive trees that are hundreds of years of old, which they remove using excavators, and are then taking into Israel. They are worth thousands of dollars each. Typically, they end up in the gardens of newly built settler homes. They are also transporting livestock and other valuables from the areas they control behind their yellow line.

When the war restarted in March 2026, the Israeli line of control extended yet further into the south. At present, well over 600 square miles of south Lebanese territory is effectively off limits to the local farmers.

Aside from the burning, poisoning and bulldozing, the pausing of irrigation will kill the trees. This will render plantations fruitless for long into the future. Replanted citrus and olive trees need seven years of uninterrupted growth before they can start yielding. Avocados require five and bananas at least two.

Economy in ruins

Recently published figures by the World Bank estimate the cost of lost revenue up until 2025 at $1.2 billion. But this could just represent a fraction of the damage to livelihoods for years to come.

Advertisement

Satellite imagery seen by the farmers union confirms that over 7,000 hectares of farm land have been actively destroyed, with other occupied areas withering from neglect.

Along with the crops, the Israelis are also destroying the farmhouses and other infrastructure. Mohammad continued:

Around the border they are demolishing entire villages. Places like Bint Jbeil, Aitaroun and Aita Shaab are flattened. But they are forgetting the history of this area. Since 1982, the farmers have refused to leave this land. They have even stayed in tents, so that they can replant when they have had no homes. The people will return like they did in 2000 and 2006. They have beaten these occupations before.

All the time we are getting reports of farmers being shot at by the IDF when they approach their land. Yesterday, they dropped sound bombs on farmers in Nabatieh. Using their AI and facial recognition, the IDF can easily distinguish between civilians and fighters. Their cameras can recognise faces and connect to open sources like social media. They know that these people are non-combatants, but they attack them anyway. They just want to eliminate everyone. To make this an empty zone.

Threats and intimidation

Mohammad shared a recent experience of his own with me:

Advertisement

Before the ceasefire, I was 20 kilometres away from the yellow line harvesting bananas. They called me, ordering me to leave. They use some kind of machine that calls our mobiles with a recorded message, spreading the threat that we should move away from the area. The calls come from European and international phone numbers. My call came from Serbia.

The following day, we were heading south through miles of fields and plantations. Some of the bridges we crossed were temporary structures, placed by the army above the ruins of the original ones. Most farmhouses along our route were reduced to rubble.

When we reached our destination, Fadel Soufan, a member of the citrus growers association, took us on a tour of one of the local orchards to inspect the damage. A drone hummed overhead.

The area was vast with groves stretching for miles in every direction. Oranges and lemons worth millions of dollars lay rotting under the trees. Many of the trees were clearly dying. He explained that everyone had fled the area after six workers were killed in a drone strike:

It was night and they were getting ready to sleep in their tent when the drone came for them. None survived. They were from Syria and Palestine. They were innocent and had nothing to do with this war.

Much of Lebanon’s rural economy depends on migrant labour from poorer communities in neighbouring countries, or from refugee camps within its borders. The heat-sensitive cameras of the drone that murdered those people did not differentiate between people holding scythes or those who carry guns.

Advertisement

Artillery strikes on agricultural infrastructure

Fadel took me away from the track to show me an area targeted by the IOF:

This is where they shelled the plantation with their artillery.

A series of craters marked the places where the shells had landed among the trees, which were scorched and lacerated by shrapnel. Some of them were snapped in two nearest to where the explosions had detonated. The area was clearly of no military significance, but the object of the assault lay destroyed in the centre of the targeted area.

A twisted heap of metal and thick rubber pipes lay in a clearing. It had been the pumping facility that connected the nearest well to miles of smaller pipes that irrigated the orchards. The generator, which powered it and similar appliances, had also been destroyed by shelling a hundred yards away.

The bombing was a deliberate and calculated act of vandalism that would condemn the plantation to die in the unforgiving sun, unless it was repaired in the very near future.

Advertisement

For as long as the Israelis remain, the farmland of south Lebanon and its associated infrastructure will continue to degrade.

The present dynamic is different to previous occupations as no locals remain behind the so-called yellow line of control. For the local fighters intent on removing the IOF, this is both a blessing and a curse. They can engage their enemy without putting civilian lives at risk, but moving around this area undetected by modern military technology is now a lot harder.

All images and videos courtesy of the author

By Guy Smallman

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home | Counter Terrorism Now Leading On Investigation Into Ann Widdecombe Murder

Published

on

Counter Terrorism Now Leading On Investigation Into Ann Widdecombe Murder
Counter Terrorism Now Leading On Investigation Into Ann Widdecombe Murder

Ann Widdecombe was found dead in her home in Devon last week (Alamy)


2 min read

Counter terrorism police are now leading on the investigation into the murder of Ann Widdecombe “following new information and evidence”, the Home Secretary has said.

Advertisement

Widdecombe, a former Conservative MP and minister who later joined Reform UK, was found dead in her home last week.

On Saturday evening, a 28-year-old man was arrested in South Yorkshire on suspicion of murder after Widdecombe’s death.

The suspect is believed to have driven almost 300 miles to Widdecombe’s home in Dartmoor, Devon, on the day she was killed. 

Advertisement

On Monday morning, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood posted on X that she had spoken to the head of counter terrorism police and “following new information and evidence, they are now leading on the investigation into the horrific murder of Ann Widdecombe”.

“The police are pursuing multiple lines of enquiry to establish the motivation for this attack. I will be updating the House further this afternoon.”

The head of national counter-terrorism policing, Laurence Taylor, said: “Building on the progress made by our colleagues in Devon and Cornwall police, we now have new information and evidence that means counter-terrorism policing is now leading the investigation.

Advertisement

“We are pursuing multiple lines of enquiry to establish the motivation for this attack.

“Our priority is progressing this investigation quickly, with all the capabilities we have available to us. If anyone has any information, please share it with the police.”

A 26-year-old man was previously arrested on Friday but was released on Saturday and has now been ruled out of all police inquiries. 

Mahmood is set to update MPs on the case on Monday afternoon.

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Majority of voters think Farage was wrong over undeclared gifts

Published

on

Nigel Farage of Reform UK

Nigel Farage of Reform UK

As we’ve extensively reported, Nigel Farage is facing criticism over the various gifts and donations he’s failed to declare. He’s also facing multiple investigations into the same cases.

Unsuprisingly, the public is largely unimpressed with this state of affairs.

Nigel Farage vs the public

Farage has multiple ongoing scandals right now, including:

Now, the Times has commissioned YouGov to poll the public on what they think about the matter. They asked 2,000 people, which is about twice as many as you need for a poll to be considered credible.

The key takeaway is this:

Advertisement

Six in 10 voters believe Nigel Farage has behaved incorrectly over undeclared gifts from wealthy benefactors and only half of Reform UK voters back him

The issue isn’t that voters are simply uniformed because:

Some 22 per cent said they had seen “a lot” about accusations that he did not correctly register donations and another 45 per cent said they had seen “a fair amount”. Only 9 per cent said they had seen “nothing at all”.

Other findings include:

  • 40% of voters “disapprove of Farage’s decision to call a by-election” (22% approve)
  • 35% “think Farage is treated in the same way as politicians from other parties” (24% think the press is more hostile towards him)
  • 26% actually think the press is “unduly lenient” towards Farage

Farage ‘very sleazy’

The above isn’t the only polling YouGov has done on Farage recently. Data released on 10 July found:

Most Britons say Nigel Farage is ‘very sleazy’

Results included:

  • 73% of Britons describe Nigel Farage as sleazy, including 56% thinking he is *very* sleazy
  • This includes 40% of Reform UK voters seeing Farage as sleazy
  • Belief Reform UK as a party is sleazy has increased by 18 points over the last two years, with the public now more likely to consider them to be dodgy than Labour
  • 77% of the public feel British governments are generally sleazy
  • Keir Starmer is seen as sleazy by 51% of Britons, with 42% saying the same of Zack Polanski and 34-36% of Kemi Badenoch or Andy Burnham

That 77% figure is key to understanding why people will support Farage regardless. Once you think all politicians are corrupt, your options are:

  • Don’t vote
  • Ignore corruption as a factor

Still, Reform and Farage do top the charts when it comes to the perception of sleaziness.

Fading fortunes

It seems that the more the public sees of Farage, the more they dislike him. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean Reform couldn’t win in a general election. What we’ve seen in recent years is that politicians don’t need to enjoy broad support from the public; they just need to be less hated than the alternative.

Advertisement

Still, Farage’s various financial scandals could sink his career regardless of what’s happening with his popularity. We’re sure that Farage won’t be happy about that. We’re equally sure the public will broadly think he had it coming.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

What will Andy Burnham mean for EU relations?

Published

on

What will Andy Burnham mean for EU relations?

Based on what we know so far, Joël Reland considers how an incoming Andy Burnham government might approach its relationship to the European Union.

For all the ink which has been spilled previewing Andy Burnham’s government, precious little has discussed his approach to EU relations. This is largely because his narrative has been relentlessly domestic, but his op-ed in the Times last week provided some hints as to what his foreign policy might look like.

With the heavy caveat that Burnham has not yet taken power – or announced who his Foreign Secretary or EU Minister will be – it was possible to detect some important shifts in approach. The paradox is that Burnham sounds less pro-European than Starmer, but is formulating an economic and security agenda which could in fact bring London into closer line with Brussels.

Clearly, EU relations are less central to Burnham’s growth agenda than to Starmer’s. Both Starmer and Rachel Reeves have been stressing with increasing urgency the economic damage caused by Brexit and the need to get closer to the EU single market, calling it the “biggest prize” on offer to the UK economy. Burnham, on the other hand, has centred his growth agenda on devolution within the UK – not building ties beyond it – meaning EU relations are likely to drop down the list of priorities.

Advertisement

It is telling that, in his Times piece, Burnham says he wants to ‘consolidate the progress made on the existing UK-EU negotiations’ – an ambiguous construction which does not commit to finalising agreements by a specific date. In contrast, Starmer’s administration clearly wanted a package of agreements sorted by this summer’s UK-EU summit (which has been postponed since Starmer’s resignation).

Negotiations which are already stuttering could stall altogether if Burnham deems that a youth mobility scheme, where EU students pay UK tuition fee rates and add to net migration figures, does not pass his ‘Makerfield test’.  And even if agreements are finalised, the implementation of the necessary ‘dynamic alignment’, which is a significant bureaucratic task, may be slow given how much of Whitehall’s capacity will presumably be focused on delivering a radical devolution agenda.

Yet a Burnham administration could still bring fresh impetus to discussions on the future relationship. After all, Burnham says he wants to ‘make further progress quickly’, with his areas of focus being ‘strengthening our co-operation on illegal migration, economic security and the broader resilience of our societies to external threats’. Notably lacking is any talk of further economic agreements.

This may go down well in Brussels. The EU has more interest in the UK as a security partner than as an economic one. And, as is now well established, the Labour government is boxed in by its ‘red lines’ (no customs union, single market or free movement), which mean the Commission is unwilling to countenance deeper economic integration in many, if any, more areas.

Advertisement

The UK’s springtime proposal to join the EU single market for goods was rapidly dismissed – and it was not clear what else the Starmer administration could hope to achieve on the trade front. A UK which stops trying to ‘cherry pick’ its access to the single market would come as a welcome relief to the EU.

Moreover, there is plenty of unfinished business when it comes to closer security cooperation. A non-binding Security and Defence Partnership was signed before last year’s UK-EU summit but is yet to yield much fruit. Talks could be reanimated on UK participation in SAFE (an EU instrument for common defence borrowing) as well as other EU-led missions and projects, while Stamer is set this week to formalise UK participation in the Ukraine loan scheme.

There is also one important way in which Burnham does appear more European than Starmer. His ambition for greater ‘sovereign capabilities in areas… from shipbuilding and energetics to AI and quantum’ is strikingly similar to EU plans for greater ‘strategic autonomy’, i.e. reducing reliance on foreign suppliers in critical sectors.

A recent story about the Burnham team’s plan to make UK AI policy less ‘US-centric’ and ensure that “100 per cent of data centres aren’t owned by foreign companies” sounds like it could have been briefed by an Elysée official.

Advertisement

Yet 100% national ownership of critical tech infrastructure is an evidently unrealistic objective – meaning a less US-centric agenda will rely on greater ‘friendshoring’ of supply chains. This might quickly lead the Burnham government to look to the EU as a partner in, for instance, procuring critical minerals or developing pan-European sovereign capabilities in areas like cloud storage and payment systems – or to see what it can learn from the EU’s experience with its new Tech Sovereignty package.

This is the kind of economic and regulatory cooperation which is not necessarily precluded by Labour’s red lines. UK participation in a ‘Made in Europe’ scheme (subsidising European production of electric vehicles) and ‘Scaleup Europe’ fund for breakthrough technologies are both plausible; as are strategic dialogues on economic security and digital infrastructure.

Moreover, the Starmer administration’s overt attempts to court US tech and AI investment through lighter-touch regulation has been noticed in EU capitals, creating doubts about inviting the UK into new projects like ‘Made in Europe’ – out of fear it might operate as a US trojan horse. Burnham’s more Gaullist agenda may calm some of those nerves.

For all EU relations have improved under Starmer, certain Atlanticist instincts and a lack of realism about his red lines remained two marks against him. If Burnham can address those issues, he could prove a popular man in Brussels.

Advertisement

By Joël Reland, Senior Researcher, UK in a Changing Europe.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Michael Jackson Biopic Makes $1 Billion Despite Controversy

Published

on

Michael Jackson Biopic Makes $1 Billion Despite Controversy

All of the controversy surrounding Antoine Fuqua’s Michael Jackson biopic has clearly not stood in the way of the film succeeding at the box office.

Earlier this year, Michael hit cinemas, leaving critics divided, not least because of the fact the film ends in 1988, meaning the allegations of child sexual abuse levelled against the Billie Jean singer in his lifetime were not included in the film.

Since its release in April, Michael has proved to be a smash at the global box office, eventually overtaking Oppenheimer to become the highest-grossing biopic of all time.

Over the weekend, it was revealed officially that the movie had made $1 billion (around £746 million), becoming the first biopic in history to do so.

Advertisement

“Reaching this extraordinary $1 billion milestone with Michael is a deeply humbling moment that celebrates the tireless dedication of our incredible producers, cast, crew and partners,” the film’s director said in a statement.

“This achievement belongs to everyone who came together with a shared vision to honour one of the greatest artists the world has ever known.”

Antoine continued: “I am profoundly grateful to the audiences around the globe who embraced this film, showed up in theatres, and connected with this story across generations and cultures.

Advertisement

“This historic milestone is a testament to the enduring power of cinema to bring us together, and it is a chapter in movie history I will never forget.”

Jafaar Jackson, the late performer’s nephew, takes the lead as Michael Jackson in the film, which also features performances from Nia Long, Miles Teller and Oscar nominee Colman Domingo.

It’s no secret that Michael was originally supposed to include details of the allegations made against the Grammy winner, with some scenes even being filmed.

However, these were scrapped when production learned of a clause in the settlement between Jackson and one of his accusers which meant that his likeness and name could not ever be used in a film.

Advertisement

As a result, costly reshoots took place, with the decision being made to re-shift the film’s plot to be more about Jackson’s relationship with his father, ending the story in the late 80s.

It had previously been suggested that a sequel to Michael could focus on the chart-topping performer’s later years, and the controversies he faced around that time, which looks increasingly likely given part one’s box office success.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025