Politics
Israel targets Iran’s railways infrastructure
#BREAKING Israeli jets struck around 10 railway segments and bridges in Iran, Army Radio says pic.twitter.com/hYeI5VfOPR
— Anadolu English (@anadoluagency) April 7, 2026
Israel seems to believe warnings negate war crimes
The IOF tweeted an urgent warning in Farsi earlier Tuesday, telling people across Iran to avoid trains and railway lines until 9 pm local time.
‼️ هشدار فوری به استفادهکنندگان و مسافران قطارها در کشور ایران.
⭕️ شهروندان گرامی، به منظور امنیت شما، خواهشمندیم از این لحظه تا ساعت ۲۱:۰۰ به وقت ایران، از استفاده و سفر با قطار در سراسر ایران خودداری نمایید.
⭕️ حضور شما در قطارها و در مجاورت خطوط راهآهن جانتان را به خطر می… pic.twitter.com/Fm3BAAEFra
— ارتش دفاعی اسرائیل | IDF Farsi (@IDFFarsi) April 7, 2026
Iran’s cultural heritage minister, Reza Salehi Amiri, wrote to UNESCO on Tuesday following the IOF’s war crimes.
Following the Zionist regime’s threat to attack the Iranian railway, which is registered on the UNESCO World Heritage List, the Minister of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts sent an official letter to the Director-General of UNESCO. pic.twitter.com/MElfmaBKjk
— Tehran Times (@TehranTimes79) April 7, 2026
He called IOF’s actions a clear attack on the common heritage of humanity, calling for a clear, immediate, and deterrent stance from UNESCO, as the Tehran Times reported.
Trump has called for further escalation. In his latest bizarre rant on Tuesday, Trump said he would wipe out the country unless it opened the straits of Hormuz ahead of a deadline he’d set for 8 pm on 7 April 2026. Trump said on Truth Social:
A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?
The whole US administration is either too ignorant to understand the nuclear threat behind Trump’s rant or is just going along with it. JD Vance, seemingly, endorsed Trump’s policies, whatever they may be, after the expiration of the deadline.
“I hope they make the right response,” says @VP on Iran.
“They’ve got to know, we’ve got tools in our toolkit that we so far haven’t decided to use. @POTUS can decide to use them, and he will decide to use them if the Iranians don’t change their course of conduct.” pic.twitter.com/UUiQ5SdEO5
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 7, 2026
The IOF and the US are operating without any restraint in their war against Palestine, Lebanon, and Iran, using similar tactics of total war, with no distinction between military and civilian targets.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Unite officers vote for strike action over lack of union recognition
The officers’ branch of Unite has voted overwhelmingly for ‘all-out’ strike action over the refusal of Unite’s management to recognise its union.
Of a huge 80% turnout, 85% of officers voted in support of the strike.
This is the second time Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham, has faced strike action from union employees after staff working for Graham’s husband, Jack Clarke, walked out complaining of bullying, misogyny and intimidation.
The ballot result comes as Graham campaigns for re-election and as her hangers-on try to get elected on to Unite’s executive.
Unite: ‘It’s time to Reunite and end the toxicity’
The Reunite the Union activist group welcomed the strike vote and promised solidarity with the workers, which includes a “three-point plan to resolve the dispute”. A statement from the group stated it’s “time to Reunite and end the toxicity which is dividing our union”.
It continued:
Self-defeating intransigence is a familiar trait of Sharon Graham’s management.
It is the same approach which resulted in picket lines outside Holborn against a ‘toxic bullying culture,’ complete with a ‘counter-demo’ led by Graham’s self-styled enforcer Chris Stiles and our union’s Organising Director Tayra Lopes-Lister. This resulted from the BDSU researchers simply requesting a meeting with their line management over grading.
It is the same approach which forced members of our Executive Council to turn to the Certification Officer to compel Sharon Graham’s management team to disclose our union’s finances.
Politically, the same intransigence has led Sharon Graham to remain silent on Reform’s direct attack on our union and our members.
Industrially, the same intransigence has led important disputes to defeat. For example, the nearly six-month strike at Bakkavor in Spalding ended in members having to accept the same percentage pay offer originally rejected at the start of the dispute. That dispute was continued from above, despite growing numbers of members crossing their own picket. From Veolia to Port Talbot, a pattern of behaviour repeats itself.
A pervasive culture of toxicity and division has been created in our union. It manifests in different ways, but the cause is the same.
In the elections, Graham has so far failed to condemn homophobic comments by one of her ‘exec’ candidates who supports fascist racist Tommy Robinson. But her behaviour had outraged union staff and activists long before that, often centring around the alleged conduct of Jack Clarke and her measures to protect him.
Graham and Clarke vs workers
Clarke was promoted shortly after Graham took over the union in 2021, overseeing the newly-created Bargaining and Disputes Unit (BDSU). Union insiders point out that Unite’s approval procedures for the promotion had not been followed. Prior to his promotion, Clarke was on a final warning from Unite for his behaviour.
BDSU staff were soon in dispute with the union and Clarke over alleged bullying by Clarke and his cronies. However, their complaints were not the first such allegations against Clarke.
In 2018, before Graham became Unite’s general secretary, she asked colleagues to destroy evidence of bullying and misogyny gathered by staff working under him in his previous role. In a stunning December 2024 development, Graham’s lawyers admitted that, following her takeover, the union destroyed the evidence.
Graham and Unite have also spent huge amounts of members’ money on lawyers’ fees, most recently to sue barely-followed and anonymous X accounts on behalf of Clarke.
Anti-union union?
Staff have also accused Graham and her management team of employing intimidation, suspension and anti-union tactics against staff in the dispute. This outraged Unite’s National Industrial Sector Committee (NISC) for the print and graphics sector, and the leaders of two unions representing Unite staff and officers.
So bad has this alleged conduct been that more than 90% of Unite staff working at the union’s Holborn HQ voted for strike action. Three — some say four — of the five women who worked in Clarke’s department since Graham formed it and put him in charge of it have left. Union sources say they also alleged bullying and abuse.
Unite’s staff branch unanimously condemned the union’s abuse of its staff. The influential Officers National Committee (ONC) accused Graham of using Murdoch-style anti-union tactics against workers and officers unionising and taking collective action.
Now, after fighting Graham’s moves to undermine their attempts to organise since the beginning of 2025, Unite’s officer group will soon begin strike action. It is an action that may well impact her attempts to get herself and her hangers-on re-elected.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Zendaya And Robert Pattinson’s The Drama Faces Backlash Over Twist
This article contains major spoilers for The Drama.
Zendaya and Robert Pattinson’s new movie The Drama continues to face backlash and accusations of trivialising a serious issue.
Released last week, the pair’s new movie centres around a young couple who are about to get married, only for their whole world to be turned upside down when a revelation from the bride-to-be’s past comes to light.
What was deliberately left out of the film’s promotional material was the fact Zendaya’s character’s dark secret was that she had planned and almost carried out a school shooting when she was a teenager.
Even before the movie had hit cinemas, its subject matter had proved to be controversial, with the father of a high school student killed in the Columbine shooting of 1999 telling TMZ he thought it was “awful” that the subject of mass violence should be used for entertainment.
Since then, others affected by the subject have been speaking out.
Mia Tretta, a survivor of two school shootings, told USA Today: “A character planning a school shooting isn’t something that should be joked about – it’s a reality that me and hundreds of thousands of others live every day.”
“Even the title of the film being The Drama,” she added. “A school shooting is not girls gossiping in class or stealing someone else’s boyfriend – it’s real people’s nightmares.”
She added: “It’s frankly exploiting a crisis. There are ways to show this nuance without using people’s trauma as a gimmick. Studios and stars have massive platforms that they should use to give dimension to survivors, not perpetrators.”
In another interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Parkland shooting survivor Jackie Corin said: “Gun violence, particularly in schools, is not just another dramatic device. Art has the capacity to deepen public understanding and create emotional clarity and awareness, but it can also flatten and distort reality, especially when it leans on shorthand or tries to make something more palatable than it actually is.
“With something like a near school shooting, even small tonal choices can shift whether a story feels productive or dismissive.”
Neither Tretta nor Corin had seen The Drama at the time of their respective interviews.
The gun control advocacy group March For Our Lives previously posted a statement on Instagram, in which they said: “The way this film has been marketed is deeply misaligned with the reality it engages. We expect better from A24 and the artists behind it.”
HuffPost UK has contacted representatives for the production company A24 and The Drama director Kristoffer Borgli for comment.
Zendaya previously told Jimmy Kimmel Live!: “Everybody has their own kind of feelings leaving the theatre [after watching The Drama], especially with the big twist. And there’s so many conversations that are had after you watch it.
“It’s just one of those things, I really hope that people don’t spoil it for each other so they’re allowed to go into it just unknowing and really experience The Drama.”
The Drama received largely positive reviews from critics upon its release, although many anticipated that its central themes could make it an uncomfortable and polarising watch.
While it fell behind Project Hail Mary and The Super Mario Galaxy Movie at the box office, it still pulled in a decent-sized audience, giving A24 its third biggest opening weekend to date after Civil War and Marty Supreme.
Politics
Peaky Blinders Cast: Jamie Bell And Charlie Heaton To Lead New Series
The new Peaky Blinders series is picking up momentum as an array of exciting names have been announced to pick up the baton from Cillian Murphy and co.
So far, 2026 has been a strong year for Peaky Blinders fans, after the show’s spin-off film, The Immortal Man, landed in cinemas and on Netflix to a warm reception from fans and critics alike, four years after we last saw Tommy Shelby on our screens.
Last year, it was revealed that Peaky Blinders would be returning for two brand new series, introducing a “new generation of Shelbys”.
Now, it has been confirmed that Rocketman and Billy Elliot star Jamie Bell will lead the new cast, playing Tommy Shelby’s eldest son Duke.

This marks the third iteration of the character, with Duke most recently being played by Barry Keoghan in The Immortal Man, while Bafta Rising Star winner Conrad Khan portrayed Tommy’s eldest son in the TV series.
The BBC has said that Duke will be at the “blood-soaked heart” of the new Peaky Blinders series, adding that he’s “older, wiser, more ambitious, and most certainly more dangerous” in his latest outing at the centre of the drama.
Stranger Things star Charlie Heaton will also be joining the line-up in a lead role, along with James Bond star Lashana Lynch, Downton Abbey’s Jessica Brown Findlay and newcomer Lucy Karczewski.
So far, their exact characters and role in the new storyline are being kept under wraps.

The new era of Peaky Blinders will take place 10 years after the events of the film, and will drop us in post-war Birmingham in the 1950s for two series, with the “race to rebuild” the city offering up new opportunity and danger for the next generation of the Shelby family.
While Cillian won’t be returning, Peaky Blinders creator and writer Steven Knight is behind the wheel again, promising: “There are more exciting cast announcements to come, and Peaky is on the road again.”
Filming on the new series has already started in Birmingham, although we don’t have an exact release date just yet.
We do know, though, that the two new series will both contain six 60-minute episodes, and will premiere on BBC iPlayer and BBC One in the UK and on Netflix globally.
Peaky Blinders previously aired for six series between 2013 and 2022, with the historical gangster drama picking up a Bafta for Best Drama Series in 2018.
Politics
The rampant misogyny of transing Elizabeth I
Appropriately, it was April Fool’s Day when I read that Queen Elizabeth I is to be portrayed as a cross-dressing man in a forthcoming television show. But we live in times when the more silly and outlandish a rumoured cultural or political plan, the more likely it is to be true. Majesty – an oddly ‘heritage’ title for a project that clearly considers itself ‘transgressive’ – is set to film this summer, and is seeking ‘trans actresses’ (what we used to call cross-dressers, before they got really cross) to play the monarch.
The Sun, which first reported it, seemed drearily inclined to go along with the usual sexist claims of the trans lobby. ‘She is known for having traits associated with a male monarch’, it mouthed in a mealy manner in an article last week. What would those be – not getting her tits out for, if not the cameras, then the portrait painters of the era? ‘Some have speculated she had male pseudo-hermaphroditism, known as testicular feminisation’, the Sun continued, also noting that ‘others are obsessed with the Bisley Boy myth’. Yes, ‘obsessed’ isn’t too extreme a word here – I often hear people at bus stops discussing the Bisley Boy myth. This is the claim that Princess Elizabeth died in her youth and was replaced by a local boy with red hair. It was popularised by Bram Stoker in his 1910 book, Famous Imposters – because Bram ‘Dracula’ Stoker never made up far-fetched stories based extremely loosely on real people, did he?
The Sun quoted a ‘TV insider’ who insists: ‘Most historians dismiss the claims as misogyny motivated by the idea no woman could be as strong or capable without actually being a man. But it’s a theory which captures the imagination and appears to answer a lot of other questions around the unique queen.’
What would these questions be? That Elizabeth never married and had no children? Must be a bloke, then – what real woman would forego such unqualified pleasures? It’s a sign that trans thought is so woefully conventional, so gender straitjacketed, that it just doesn’t seem able to grasp, in this case, why a woman would refuse to hand over her hard-won power to a man by marrying a stranger who didn’t even speak her language. Or that she said on the eve of the Spanish Armada invasion: ‘I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king’? It’s called wordplay, I believe, and was extremely common until people with Tin Ear Syndrome – a disease affecting the ‘trans community’ and their inordinate number of ‘allies’ – became so prevalent among those in the arts and media.
This, of course, is our old mate ‘Queering the Past’ (or ‘lying’ as those not educated beyond all common sense and honesty know it) beloved of universities, museums and other beclowned institutions. There have been some truly rib-tickling examples of it, such as the claim that ‘trans Vikings’ existed, which sounds like a Monty Python sketch; sometimes the whole circus gets too much even for the most proudly gay public figure. In 2023, the museum dedicated to conserving the Mary Rose hosted a blog, promising to understand the collection of everyday objects found on the 16th-century ship ‘through a queer lens’. This prompted the great Philip Hensher to post on X: ‘I am as keen as anyone on gay sex, but I have to say to these curators – you’re fucking mental.’
We can easily mock the kind of mind that can tie itself into the most labyrinthine of sailor’s knots in order to posit the notion of invading ‘trans’ hordes raping their way across countries, presumably using papier-mâché penises, without the poor women of those nations noticing. Who cares about Vikings’ rights anyway? But it’s beyond a joke when real women who lived in (relatively) recent memory – who we know had to fight against monstrous insults and / or oppression – have their remains picked over by academic half-wits, apparently for no greater cause than making inadequate men (befrocked or not) feel better about themselves; Joan of Arc, Rosa Bonheur, Louisa May Alcott, Storme DeLarverie. Some women pretended to be men so they could be doctors, soldiers, pirates – not because they really considered themselves he / hims. The class privilege of those intent on ‘queering’ every female ‘presenting’ as female in history quite understandably prevents them from understanding how earning a living was the reason many women pretended to be men – including, of course, the Brontë sisters, or Currer, Ellis and Acton Bell, as they were known. Or even JK Rowling, whose publishers advised her that boys would not buy books written by someone called Joanne.
Famous women are rare in history. They are generally there because they dared to do what was not expected of them – sometimes on pain of death. Yet somehow, it’s now ‘progressive’ to cancel them out by posthumously changing their sex. It’s especially idiotic in the case of Elizabeth I, who if she had really been born male (and let’s remember that royal births have been witnessed by the courtiers and politicians of the day, a practice which only ended in 1948, prior to the birth of Prince Charles) would not have seen her mother executed, when Elizabeth was still a child. Her father married and murdered multiple times because he couldn’t get a male heir. It’s telling that those who scream most loudly about having their feelings hurt when they’re called Martha instead of Arthur don’t mind trampling all over the graves of women killed by the savage misogyny of the age. Their lack of respect for the dead reminds one of the way rape and murder victims once had their reputations trashed by authorities defending violent males.
A less important but still significant side effect of ‘queering’ or ‘transing’ the past is that this will mean fewer roles for actresses, already at a disadvantage in a profession that throws them on the scrapheap far earlier than men. Shakespeare’s heroines were originally played by teenage boys, as it was considered improper for women to display themselves in such a way. The call for ‘actors who identify as transgender women’, as the casting call for Majesty puts it, means that women can be edged out once more. Over the past few years, the woman-face actors Karla Sofia Gascon, Michaela Jaé Rodriguez and Laverne Cox have been nominated for Academy Awards, Golden Globes, Emmys and BAFTAS in the female categories. Tellingly, there’s been no traffic the other way, with women pretending to be men being put up for male prizes.
When I was a youngster in the 1970s, and Margaret Thatcher first came to notice as a leader of the Tory Party, I remember the sneering from both right and left about her being ‘a man in drag’ and ‘a female impersonator’. I never thought I’d be hearing the same sort of trash talk about powerful women half a century later, as the Elizabeth project so creepily does. Tell you what, queer folx, let’s just explain away every driven, successful woman in history as a man and have done with it; from Don Ciccone and John Crawford in the showbiz world to everyone from Lionel Shriver to me in the writing world. Because women aren’t ambitious and forceful, ever. Talk about erasure!
Julie Burchill is a spiked columnist. Follow her Substack, ‘Notes from the Naughty Step’, here.
Politics
Newcastle set for UK and Europe’s first Palestinian memorial
A new memorial for Palestinian civilians could be added to Newcastle’s Peace Garden following a proposal supported by local councillors and community groups.
The Peace Garden, located within the grounds of Newcastle’s Civic Centre, was established as a space for remembrance and reflection for communities affected by war, genocide and violence.
Councillor Habib Rahman has led the new initiative. His work with Newcastle City Council helped create the memorial area.
Two memorials have already been installed in the garden. In 2024, a memorial stone was unveiled in remembrance of the genocide against the Tutsi people of Rwanda, supported by Newcastle’s Rwandan community.
A second memorial was installed in 2025 to recognise the genocide against the Roma people. At the same time, an oak tree was planted to commemorate Jewish refugees and victims of the Srebrenica genocide.
Plans for memorial stone and olive tree
Rahman has now proposed a further memorial stone to honour Palestinian civilians who have lost their lives during the Israel–Gaza conflict. The proposal also includes planting an olive tree as a symbol of remembrance.
The idea was presented to Newcastle city council leader Karen Kilgour and referenced in a cabinet update to full council in March 2026 under future considerations for the Peace Garden.
Council documents state that Rahman is facilitating discussions with the local Palestinian community, to establish a permanent memorial within the Civic Centre grounds.
Council arboriculture specialists are currently considering the most suitable location within the Civic Centre green spaces to plant the olive tree.
The item was not discussed in detail at the March council meeting as the session was dominated by budget discussions. However, Rahman later wrote to the council leader requesting that the proposal be progressed through a council and cabinet decision.
He also confirmed that the full cost of the memorial and tree planting would be covered entirely by the community.
In a letter responding to the proposal, a council officer confirmed formal acceptance of the plan to install a permanent memorial commemorating innocent Palestinian civilians.
Rahman said he was proud of the work that had gone into creating the Peace Garden:
I am immensely proud of the work undertaken to establish the Peace Garden. As a City of Sanctuary, it is fitting that Newcastle has a dedicated space for remembrance and reflection.
It reflects our city’s long-standing tradition of solidarity, our stance against genocide and war, and our commitment to empathy and remembrance.
He added:
We have already made history with memorials recognising the genocide against the Tutsi people of Rwanda and the genocide against the Roma people.
By establishing a memorial for the Palestinian people, alongside the planting of an olive tree, we have the opportunity to make history again, which we will now work towards a date later this year.
Mohammed Wafi, of the Palestine Community North East, said:
We thank Councillor Rahman for his leadership in securing this historic approval. This memorial will mean a great deal to our community, and we will now work with him and the Council to deliver it.
Rahman said he would continue working with Newcastle’s Palestinian community and the city council to deliver the memorial later this year.
When completed, this will become the first Palestinian memorial of its kind in the UK and Europe.
Featured image supplied
Politics
TUC calls for urgent support for at-risk manufacturers as illegal war fuels Trumpflation
The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has called for a targeted emergency package to protect UK companies from the effects of Donald Trump’s illegal war. The union body refers to at-risk manufacturers like chemicals, ceramics and glass. And it says:
Trump’s war must not put jobs in critical industries at risk.
In the face of “Trumpflation” sending gas and energy prices soaring, the TUC argues that urgent support is needed to protect energy intensive sectors from the economic damage of the war. Of course, any impact on the UK pales in comparison with the horrors in countries directly under attack. But the TUC points out the war and its consequences could affect thousands of UK jobs.
The call comes after the OECD warns the UK faces the biggest hit to growth of all G20 economies from the war in West Asia.
Emergency measures for most at-risk manufacturers
Immediate support should focus on the most at-risk businesses to protect key UK manufacturing sectors, the TUC says.
Gas-intensive businesses face the most immediate exposure in the current energy crisis. The union body is therefore calling for a temporary targeted gas price cap to stabilise the price of gas for critical industries. This would target sectors where gas accounts for at least 70% of energy demand (like ceramics), or at least 70% of raw materials.
As the effects of the war flow through to higher electricity prices for industry, the TUC is also calling for the government urgently to speed up its energy price support scheme (the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme – BICS) and make sure it reaches the manufacturing sites that need it the most. Many manufacturers (beyond those in gas-intensive industries) were already struggling before the crisis hit, and are now in even more need of support.
Fix the foundations to prevent future crises
Support must also go beyond the immediate crisis, the TUC argues. The UK has been at the “mercy of global gas markets for too long”. With an unstable president in the White House, and increasing volatility across the globe, UK households and businesses cannot afford to be “lurching from crisis to crisis”.
Alongside immediate-term support, the UK desperately needs structural change and investment so that industry doesn’t bear the brunt of future gas price spikes. This will also mean there is less need for government to step in during each crisis.
The TUC is calling for government to de-link electricity prices from gas. This would move the UK from being a price-taker to a price-maker. The government should also radically increase UK gas storage capacity, and accelerate investment in energy efficiency and electrification upgrades.
These proposals to reform the UK’s energy system and market design and to upgrade UK industry will reduce the UK’s industrial vulnerability to external crises, boost long-term resilience of domestic industries, and help protect good jobs for the long-run. Fixing the foundations of the UK’s energy market would support not just gas-intensive industries, but wider manufacturing like steel, metal and paper.
TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said:
Already struggling before the war, Trumpflation has sent gas prices soaring – further piling the pressure on some of Britain’s key industries like chemicals, ceramics and glass.
Trump’s war must not put jobs in critical industries at risk.
The government should urgently bring forward a temporary targeted gas price cap, to stabilise the price of gas for critical industries and protect UK manufacturing, and speed up the energy price support scheme making sure it reaches crucial sectors.
Smart government action can stop us lurching from crisis to crisis. The UK has been at the mercy of global gas markets for too long.
Now is the time to fix the foundations, reducing the UK’s vulnerability to global gas price shocks, boosting resilience of key industries, and protecting good jobs for the long-run.
Chief executive of Make UK Stephen Phipson said:
The war in Iran has highlighted vulnerabilities in the UK energy market that have been evident for some time and have not been addressed, the more that action is delayed the greater the risk of rapid deindustrialisation.
This now requires, urgent, efficient, and substantive action to bring down the cost of energy for industry as the clock is now approaching midnight for many companies.
This must start with the immediate implementation of the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme to all manufacturers otherwise we could face a rapid unravelling of British industry.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Faulty HMS Dragon Withdraws to Port
The Mail reports that HMS Dragon, the only warship of Britain’s in the Middle Eastern region, has withdrawn to port “for repairs and logistics after experiencing issues with its fresh water supplies.” No comment…
Politics
Home Office lying about ages of detained children
The Home Office is routinely detaining so-called “age-disputed children” as adults as part of its ‘One in, one out’ asylum scheme. That’s according to an investigation from the independent Humans for Rights Network.
Despite Labour’s increasingly far-right anti-asylum posturing, it remains illegal to detain unaccompanied child asylum seekers in adult detention centers. However, the Home Office is routinely ignoring this rule by claiming that these children are, possibly, adults.
Home Office – ‘one in, one out’
In the seven months since ‘One in, one out’ began last September, the Home Office has detained 76 ‘age-disputed’ kids. However, Freedom of information (FOI) requests issued to local authority children’s services have found that claimants treated as adults by the Home Office are often later determined to be children by social workers.
Indeed, of the 76 detainees, 26 have either been reassessed as children by Social Services, or are in the process of being. Meanwhile, 11 kids are waiting for age assessment. The Home Office has already forcibly deported 13 to France.
Damningly, one child was confirmed to be a minor after being forcibly deported.
Among the kids in question, a large proportion are Sudanese, Eritrean, or Afghan – all zones of intense and brutal conflict. Humans for Rights Network spokesperson Maddie Harris stated that:
Many of these children are survivors of torture and trafficking and are experiencing acute declines in their mental health as a result of what is often months of detention in the UK.
These children are additionally prejudiced from accessing the care and support they are entitled to as children as well as adequate, social worker-led local authority age assessments. No child should be detained, with those who remain in detention immediately released to allow them to recover and to ensure they are able to access age assessments conducted in the community where required.
The National Age Assessment Board
Home Office age assessments fall under the domain of the National Age Assessment Board (NAAB). Watchdog groups like the Refugee and Migrant Children’s Consortium (RMCC) and Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI) have raised pressing concerns about NAAB’s processes and transparency.
In particular, NAAB blurs the boundaries between ‘independent’ social workers and immigration enforcement. Likewise, it also has a massive negative impact on the kids in its ‘care’, and its decisions are deeply questionable. An RMCC report stated that:
Multiple legal cases have found NAAB assessments to be flawed, with issues including failure to apply the benefit of the doubt; reliance on subjective or culturally inappropriate indicators; and the dismissal of credible evidence from professionals who know the child. Judges have criticised the NAAB’s approach as being adversarial, inconsistent with guidance, and lacking in objectivity.
Back on 25 March, the High Court was forced to step in to prevent the Home Office from deporting two ‘age-disputed’ kids. Solicitor Elizabeth Cole, who represented one of the children, explained the level of disregard the Home Office displayed:
The Home Office’s contention that claimed a child’s age need not be determined as a matter of fact prior to their removal is highly concerning, and clearly warrants proper consideration by the court. This is particularly so as children are an extremely vulnerable group. We hope this decision will encourage the Home Office to think twice before trying to remove any disputed children to France, in order to alleviate the distress and harm which will inevitably ensue by result.
Routine inhumanity
The Guardian confronted the Home Office with the Humans for Rights Networks’ record of its mistreatment of asylum seekers. However, the government department chose to issue a stock response:
This government is bearing down on small boat crossings. We have stopped over 42,000 illegal migrants attempting to cross the channel since the election. We have removed or deported almost 60,000 people who were here illegally.
But we are going further to remove the incentives that draw illegal migrants to this country and increase removals and deportations of those with no right to be here.
Apparently, those “incentives that draw illegal migrants” include the laws which require treating traumatised children with the care they so desperately need. After all, all the Home Office needs to do is state that they’re lying about being kids. Then, miracle of miracles, it’s free to deport them. No reasonable doubt needed.
If you still needed proof of the utter routine inhumanity of successively more anti-asylum governments, then look no further.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
petition to kick firm out of UK gains momentum
A petition started by Zack Polanski to kick Palantir out of UK public services has nearly 160,000 signatures.
At nearly 160,000 signatures – my petition to stop Palantir.https://t.co/oqsZdtN3pZ
— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) April 6, 2026
Essentially, the company helps government spy agencies collect huge amounts of private data about citizens – including ICE in the US and the Israeli military.
But it also provides terrifying AI-powered military tools to the Israeli government, which it uses to carry out its Genocide in Gaza, along with its recent attacks in Iran and Lebanon.
Peter Thiel co-founded the company. Unsurprisingly, he is a billionaire Trump donor and close friend of Jeffrey Epstein.
However, the UK CEO is Louis Mosley, grandson of British fascist, Oswald Mosley.
Palantir infiltrating Britain
The company has slowly made its way into British infrastructure. During the pandemic, the government suspiciously handed Palantir a huge contract – supposedly worth only £1. This was to create a COVID-19 data store that would provide ministers with real-time information on health services and the pandemic.
Now, it has contracts worth over £500m with the UK government alone. This includes software which NHS doctors and nurses are flat-out refusing to use because of ‘privacy’ and ‘human rights concerns.
🚨 We must kick this dangerous company OUT of our national infrastructure. pic.twitter.com/KKmgR0WFKe
— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) April 5, 2026
Palantir also has a £240m deal with the UK military. Again, there was no competitive tender process, and the government just handed Palantir the deal.
Stopping “Palantir” is the most vital campaign there is for the UK at the moment. Please support it. https://t.co/tMAuhEn3Tl
— Leo (@hanwayplace) April 6, 2026
The Petition to kick Palantir out of UK public services, started by Zack Polanski, has close to 160,000 signatures. It emphasises:
But right now we’ve got a major chance to get their NHS deal scrapped – and kick start a domino effect that sees ALL their contracts ended.
How? Ministers actually have the option to cancel the NHS deal early. But with these contracts flying under the radar, it’ll take all of us speaking up to make that happen. If you agree that our NHS and other public services shouldn’t be cutting deals with a private company that helps armies kill people, sign the petition now!
Featured image via 38Degrees
Politics
President Threatens Iran, Sparks Impeachment Calls
The US president’s latest deranged Truth Social post came just hours before the deadline he imposed for Tehran to start allowing traffic to pass through the key waterway.
Around one-fifth of the global oil supply is transported through the strait, but it has been effectively closed since America and Israel began bombing Iran at the end of February.
Trump announced over the weekend that Tehran had until 1am tomorrow UK time to confirm they were ceasing attacks on ships trying to use the strait or else “all hell will reign down” on them.
In a follow-up post on Truth Social on Sunday, he said: “Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH!”
Posting on Tuesday morning, Trump said: “A whole civilisation will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalised minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end. God Bless the Great People of Iran!”
His comments were widely condemned online, with leading Republican and former White House official Bill Kristol calling for Trump to be impeached.
Veteran journalist and broadcast Andrew Neil said: “Is there anybody, any group, capable of staging an intervention in the White House?”
Piers Morgan, a former Trump supporter, described the president’s statement as “a brazen pre-admission of genocide … which would obviously be a war crime”.
Other responses on X were equally critical of the president’s comments.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
-
NewsBeat5 days agoSteven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
-
Business5 days agoNo Jackpot Winner and $194 Million Prize Rolls Over
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Spanx – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World6 days agoGold Price Prediction: Worst Month in 17 Years fo Save Haven Rock
-
Business2 days agoThree Gulf funds agree to back Paramount’s $81 billion takeover of Warner, WSJ reports
-
Business3 days agoExpert Picks for Every Need
-
Sports3 days agoIndia men’s 4x400m and mixed 4x100m relay teams register big progress | Other Sports News
-
Business6 days agoLogin and Checkout Issues Spark Merchant Frustration
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin enters the public bond market as Moody’s gives a first-of-its-kind crypto deal a rating
-
Business2 days agoNo Jackpot Winner, Prize to Climb to $231 Million
-
Crypto World7 days ago
Bitcoin stalls below key resistance as technical signals skew bearish
-
Tech5 days agoCommonwealth Fusion Systems leans on magnets for near-term revenue
-
Politics7 days agoStarmer’s centre has collapsed, and the left was right all along
-
Crypto World6 days agoRipple rolls out enterprise crypto treasury platform for corporates
-
Fashion1 day agoMassimo Dutti Offers Inspiration for Your Summer Mood Board
-
Crypto World7 days ago
AI Memory Rout Wipes 9% Off Nvidia Stock: Chart Says More Pain Ahead
-
Crypto World6 days agoWhy It’s Partnering, Not Issuing
-
Sports7 days agoHow to teach yourself the perfect impact position with every club
-
Tech7 days agoSolo Leveling: Ranking All Sung Jinwoo Shadows by Power
-
Sports6 days ago
Tom Pelissero Drives the Final Nail in the Coffin

You must be logged in to post a comment Login