Connect with us

Politics

Journalists shut out as Barclays activists face terror sentencing

Published

on

Barclays protest

Barclays protest

A number of journalists have been denied remote access to a judge’s hearing on whether he will sentence a group of anti-genocide activists as terrorists. The ‘Barclays 5‘ activists will appear at Preston Crown Court tomorrow to find out whether the state will punish them as terrorists despite them being convicted only of criminal damage after spray painting a Barclays bank branch.

‘Manifestly excessive’ against Barclays 5

The judge in the case, Robert Altham, has previously been found by an appeals court to impose “manifestly excessive” sentences.

In a joint statement activist groups said:

Several journalists have been denied remote access to report on the hearing, where Judge Altham will decide whether to sentence the Barclays spray painters as terrorists.

As is normal protocol, journalists are usually allowed to join a hearing via an online link. However, Judge Altham, who is known for giving protestors “manifestly excessive” sentences, has denied this right for this hearing.

Advertisement

Tomorrow, on Friday 21st August, Judge Altham will decide whether to add a “terrorist connection” to criminal damage convictions, for five Palestine Action activists who damaged windows and sprayed red paint on Barclays branch in Burnley.

Neither the defendants, nor the jury, knew that the five could be sentenced as terrorists, if convicted of criminal damage.

The idea to sentence them as terrorists only came after a dangerous precedent was set by Judge Johnson, who sentenced four activists as terrorists for destroying Israeli quadcopter drones.

Johnson’s ruling was the first time in British history that protestors who were convicted of criminal damage, were sentenced as terrorists. His ruling opened the floodgates for potentially hundreds of others to face a similar manipulated court process, to ensure terrorism sentences.

Advertisement

Journalists have been told that if they want to report on the hearing, they should attend in person and they “may” be given access.

Clearly, the court wants to crack down on those who act against genocide, behind closed doors. Groups have called on supporters to mobilise outside Preston Crown Court from 10AM.

They say we shouldn’t allow them to do this in silence.

As the statement notes, four ‘Filton 24’ activists received terror sentences despite being found guilty only of criminal damage to an Israeli weapons factory. The anti-justice move was part of the Starmer regime’s war on anti-genocide speech and protest. The Barclays case makes clear that new PM Andy Burnham – who kept the appalling Shabana Mahmood as home secretary – intends to be no less active in collaborating in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Radio 2 Host Trevor Nelson Shares Brain Tumour Diagnosis

Published

on

Radio 2 Host Trevor Nelson Shares Brain Tumour Diagnosis

DJ and radio presenter Trevor Nelson has disclosed that he has been diagnosed with a brain tumour.

Back in June, Trevor announced he would be taking a step back from his work commitments on Radio 2 and Radio 1Xtra on medical grounds.

“After a routine check-up I was advised to have some follow up tests. As a result, I will be taking some further time off,” he said at the time. “As I’m sure you can appreciate with health issues, it’s important to deal with facts and not speculate.

“So I’m concentrating on getting better, being back to 100% me and to getting back behind the mic and the decks.”

Advertisement

On Thursday afternoon, Trevor shared a video on Instagram, explaining that he’d spent the last month at home recovering from brain surgery.

“A lot of you may have seen the post that I put up at the start of summer saying that I was stepping back from all my work commitments due to illness,” he began. “There’s been a lot of speculation as to what’s wrong with me, I know that much – my phone’s blown up 20 times over with people asking what’s wrong with me.

“Due to the love and positive vibes thousands of you have literally been sending me, I felt that I should at least tell you what was wrong with me, and what happened to me.”

He continued: “I’m not going to go into it all now, and I will probably deep dive into it at a later date, so you can hear the whole crazy story. But I’ll tell you this, I was minding my own business, and then it was discovered that I had a brain tumour.

Advertisement

“As you can imagine, I was shocked, in fact, my world was turned upside down. It was a shock to myself, my close family and friends, and you can imagine, quite literally, my head was all over the place.

“I knew I had to stop work because I couldn’t be that guy on the radio, knowing I had that going on. So affirmative action had to be taken, I was given my choices of what I could do, and a few weeks later, I had a very serious surgery. Thankfully, it went incredibly well, and in the last month, I’ve been at home, recuperating, resting and recovering, and getting some post-op treatment as well.”

Trevor insisted: “I can only tell you the truth, and the truth is, I feel great right now. I feel ready to come back, I feel energised, I feel almost back to myself. Yes, I’ve had a really serious situation, but I’ve come out the other side at this point. I feel great, I feel raring to go, and I feel in good health.

“I’m playing golf, I’m doing a bit of gym, I’m doing all the things that I normally used to do, bar being on the radio and doing gigs – so let’s get that straight, and let’s get that back to normal as soon as possible. So please, don’t worry about me. I’m on the mend, I really am.”

Advertisement

Trevor is currently a weekend presenter on Radio 2, and hosted a Sunday morning show on 1Xtra until his recent health issues.

Radio 2’s official Instagram account shared a message under Trevor’s post, which read: “Sending you so much love Trevor! Can’t wait to have you back.”

His former BBC colleague Clara Amfo said: “Thank God for your brilliant surgeons, you’re meant to be here UT! Love you.”

“So good to see your face Trevor and learn that you’re doing well. Huge healing love to you wonderful man,” wrote Zoe Ball, while Jack Saunders also commented: “So glad you’re feeling better [and] more like yourself mate. We need you. Sending all the love and can’t wait to have you back doing what you do best!”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

TransActual says ‘Know Your Rights’ following the EHRC transphobic code of practice

Published

on

TransActual fights EHRC code

TransActual fights EHRC code

Trans-focused advocacy organisation TransActual has updated its ‘Know Your Rights’ guidance following the implementation of the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s transphobic code of practice for service providers on 5 August.

An explainer like TransActual’s is sadly necessary because — as many critics have highlighted — the EHRC code of practice is desperately unclear. As such, many organisations have lurched to adopt trans-hostile policies, even where there is no legal requirement to do so.

Know Your Rights

TransActual’s explainer therefore sets out to clarify how the law applies to trans people, whether or not they hold a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC). Regarding GRCs, the advocacy group stated that:

Gender Recognition Certificates are still useful for making sure you have the correct gender listed on birth, marriage, and civil partnership certificates. Although they no longer change what ‘sex’ you are treated as for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010, the Supreme Court considered them to still to have a role – what exactly that is, for the purposes of the Equality Act – is likely to be answered in future litigation.

Likewise, the guidance also offers help to employers and organisations which want to remain as trans-inclusive as possible. However, it also included the caveat that its interpretations are non-exhaustive, and wrote:

Advertisement

We would also emphasise that some things remain unclear and our overarching message is that if you are subject to discrimination, harassment or victimisation as a result of being trans, you are protected under the EA 2010 and you should seek support and assistance.

TransActual’s page, and this article for that matter, use the term ‘trans people’ to refer to individuals affected by the guidance. However, as the Canary and other critics have pointed out, there is no definitive legal way to prove one is (or is not) trans on a day-to-day basis.

As such, the guidance will likely apply to anyone who is perceived or treated as though they are trans, for whatever reason. That includes people who are trans, non-binary, butch, intersex, gender-non-conforming, or any combination thereof.

Service providers and the individual

Both the guidance and the EHRC’s code itself frequently refer to ‘service providers’. TransActual states that:

Many kinds of organisations can be service providers, including cafes, charities, hospitals, cinemas, hairdressers, utilities, local government, leisure centres, hotels, pubs… and many more.

A service provider is permitted to (“politely, privately and sensitively”) ask somebody about their assigned sex at birth. However, there remains absolutely no legal requirement for you to answer.

Advertisement

Likewise, the provider can’t ask for a GRC/documentation, or force you to use a single-sex space you’re not comfortable with. The provider also has a duty to provide a ‘mixed-sex’ alternative space, unless they have a good reason not to.

TransActual explained that you can still:

  • Seek to use the services that are right for you, including those provided for a specific ‘sex’
  • Use an accessible toilet
  • Insist that you have access to a facility that maintains your safety and dignity

The EHRC code permits service providers exclude trans people from ‘single-sex’ services, whether or not they actually align with their assigned sex. As critics like the Lemkin Institute have pointed out, this treats ensuring the comfort of cis people as a legitimate reason to exclude trans people from all ‘single-sex’ spaces.

However, this blanket exclusion is of dubious legality, and hasn’t yet been tested in court. TransActual included the warning that:

Whether it is lawful will depend on the facts of the situation – you may be able to complain or make a legal challenge if you are excluded because you’re trans.

‘Not all hope is lost’ for Trans people

TransActual concluded its updated page with a message to all trans people in the UK:

Advertisement

We want to encourage trans people not to panic, not all hope is lost – it’s bad, but we don’t know the full extent yet, it takes time to figure these things out.

Even though laws impact our lives, they cannot tell you who you are.

We will keep fighting until all trans people in the UK are able to live safely, in dignity and with access to appropriate healthcare.

You can find more information on the EA 2010 and Supreme Court ruling along with actions you can take to support the campaign to restore our rights on TransActual’s Equality Act Campaign hub.

You can read the full ‘Know Your Rights’ explainer here.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By Grace

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home | Media Coverage Of Jason Arday Was Nasty And Disproportionate, Says Ed Davey

Published

on

Media Coverage Of Jason Arday Was Nasty And Disproportionate, Says Ed Davey
Media Coverage Of Jason Arday Was Nasty And Disproportionate, Says Ed Davey

Lib Dem leader Ed Davey said there was a movement on the right “away from liberal progress” (Alamy)


3 min read

Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey has said that parts of the media reported on Jason Arday in a way that was “disproportionate, unfair, mean and nasty”.

Advertisement

Former Cambridge University professor Arday was found dead in south London last Friday after being at the centre of allegations of plagiarism and falsified achievements. 

Arday had resigned as a professor of sociology of education at Cambridge the previous week and admitted errors in his work, but denied claims of plagiarism.

In a statement, his family said: “The campaign of misinformation was too much for Jason, who was a gentle man and who always wanted to see the best in everyone.”

Advertisement

Describing Arday’s death as an “absolute tragedy”, Davey told PoliticsHome that parts of the media had seemed to “focus in on it and attack him in a way which seems awfully disproportionate, unfair, mean, and nasty”.

“What it shows is that we have to push back against this Trump-like attack on liberal values where we embrace everybody equally and respect everybody.

“There seems to be a movement, particularly on the right, to move away from the liberal progress I thought we made, where we respect people, we judge them on their merit, and we celebrate the contribution that everybody made.”

Advertisement

However, the Lib Dem leader said it was “very difficult” to hold any one person or organisation to account for the treatment of Arday. 

“There are different parts of the media jumping on that shameful bandwagon, but I think we’ve got to see the problem facing our country on a broad level,” he said. 

PoliticsHome reported on Wednesday that over 50 MPs and peers had written to the Independent Press Standards Organisation asking for an investigation into media coverage of Arday before his death.

The cross-party letter, organised by Labour MP Afzal Khan, said reporting on Arday “reached far beyond what can reasonably be perceived as conducive to the public interest in relation to his alleged plagiarism”. 

Advertisement

It also argued that it is “not unreasonable to suggest that the colour of Professor Arday’s skin was a contributing factor in garnering the level of media scrutiny he faced”, and that “Arday’s white counterparts at the University of Cambridge alone faced allegations that did not result in the same level of attention or affect.”

Signatories include Labour MPs Tulip Siddiq, Kerry McCarthy, Paula Barker and Tan Dhesi; Green MPs Sian Berry and Hannah Spencer; Plaid’s Westminster leader Liz Saville-Roberts; and former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has said Arday’s death “was a tragedy, on so many levels”, and called for a “moment of reflection” to reflect on “how things came to this”. 

The Lib Dems’ Black Lives Action Committee (BLAC) this week published an open letter in Liberal Democrat Voice saying there is a “growing anti-inclusion movement in Britain”.

Advertisement

Group members said they themselves had “failed” to take action when the Arday case was being reported.

“Four of us discussed the situation online,” the letter said. 

“We talked about what we should do, but we never reached a firm decision to act. One person repeatedly suggested that we should reach out to Professor Arday himself. We became caught in the web of inaction.”

 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Nick Jonas Recalls Frozen Audition: ‘I Bombed’

Published

on

Frozen has become a huge money-spinner for the Walt Disney Company

Nick Jonas has admitted that things didn’t quite go his way when he tried out for a role in a beloved Disney movie.

The chart-topping singer spoke about the embarrassing moment on the latest edition of the Hey Jonas! Podcast, which he co-hosts with his brothers Joe and Kevin Jonas.

During the conversation, the pop trio were joined by Frozen voice actors Kristen Bell, Idina Menzel and Josh Gad, when Nick revealed he had auditioned to play Kristoff, the rugged iceman voiced by Jonathan Groff, in the animated film and its numerous spin-offs, only to “bomb” in the room.

“I went in and they said, ‘Okay, what are you going to be singing today?’,” he recalled. “I said, ‘Oh, I don’t know’.

Advertisement

“They were like, ‘Do you have your sheet music?’ And I said, ‘No, no one told me I had [to bring any]’, and so I just said, ‘Can you play something from…?’ I don’t know what I said, some musical theatre song.”

Nick joked that as much as he loves Jonathan Groff: “I do think it would have been better to cast me.”

Despite his failed audition, Nick assured his guests he didn’t “spite-watch” Frozen and “did enjoy it” when he saw it for the first time.

Upon its release in 2013, Frozen went on to become a global phenomenon, winning two Oscars, sparking a popular sequel (with two more in the pipeline) and eventually became the fifth highest-grossing film of all time.

Advertisement
Frozen has become a huge money-spinner for the Walt Disney Company
Frozen has become a huge money-spinner for the Walt Disney Company

Meanwhile, this isn’t the first Nick has admitted he has missed out on a huge film opportunity.

As recently as May, on the band’s podcast, he explained how he messed up a meeting with the producer of a “big movie” after he failed to realise he was also the director.

“I asked him, ‘Oh, and who’s directing?’ and his response was, ‘Well, me.’ I wanted to die inside at that moment,” the Jealous singer explained.

“I think it went really well. I was very happy coming out of the room. I’m a huge fan of the show, and that’s a role I always thought it would be fun to play,” the Jonas Brothers singer admitted.

Fortunately, it’s not all been bad news for Nick’s acting career.

Advertisement

He has starred in recent music drama Power Ballad with Paul Rudd, appeared in Roland Emmerich’s historical war action Midway and had a role in the Jumanji movie Welcome To The Jungle, as well as its sequel The Next Level.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

A Protein Might Lead To Dementia, But We Could Slow It

Published

on

A Protein Might Lead To Dementia, But We Could Slow It

Types of dementia like Alzheimer’s disease have long been linked to a buildup of amyloid plaques and tau tangles in the brain. These are both proteins that have been compared to the “trigger and bullet” in the development of the condition.

But in a new study, researchers focused on a less-investigated protein: GRK2.

This research found that GRK2 has two different forms, with one kind especially plentiful in the minds of those with dementia.

Not only did they identify this problematic protein, but in tests conducted on mice, the scientists seemed to be able to block its effects.

Advertisement

What does GRK2 have to do with dementia?

About 20 years ago, the study’s lead author, Professor Ursula Quitterer, was sent brain tissue removed during tumour surgery. These samples came from people both with and without dementia.

There are two forms of GRK2: an active and an inactive kind. During extensive research both on the aforementioned tissue samples and on mice, Prof Quitterer and her team found that the brains of people with dementia had a lot more inactive GRK2 than those without.

During the development of dementia, inactive GRK2 deposits onto brain cells and damages their mitochondria (the energy-generating “powerhouse” of the cell). These “aggregates block the pores of the mitochondria, reducing the amount of energy they can supply and leading to a situation of stress inside the cells,” Prof Quitterer said.

Advertisement

In mouse studies, higher levels of inactive GRK2 were also linked to the accumulation of amyloid plaques. As we mentioned above, these have long been suspected to play a role in the development of dementia.

Worse, the stress amyloid plaques place on brain cells may lead them to form more inactive and clumping GRK2 – potentially creating a vicious cycle.

Compound 10 may break up these proteins

Prof Quitterer and her colleagues created a variety of chemical compounds to try to stop these inactive GRK2s from having such a negative effect on the brain.

Advertisement

After trials on both mice and human tissue samples, their “Compound 10” creation performed the best. It stopped GRK2 from aggregating, meaning mitochondria could keep doing their job.

And the brain’s nerve cells seemed more able to keep their function and stay alive, too.

Prof Quitterer, who is currently awaiting a patent for Compound 10, added: “Alzheimer’s is a very complex disease. That’s why it’s so important that we’ve now identified a new target protein in the form of GRK2, as well as an active ingredient that operates via GRK2 and therefore via a different mechanism than existing Alzheimer’s drugs.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Burnham: Security for Harry & Meghan Is ‘Private Matter’

Published

on

Burnham said: “It’s a matter for Harry and for Meghan, and we wish them well in the move that they are making.” Sorry Harry…

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Lily Allen Hits Back At West End Tour Critics Over One Controversial Aspect

Published

on

Lily Allen on stage at Lollapalooza Festival in Berlin last month

Lily Allen has addressed the discourse that has surrounded her ongoing world tour.

Earlier this year, the British star embarked on her Lily Allen Performs West End Girl concert tour, inspired by her critically-acclaimed fifth album.

When promoting the release in 2025, the Brit Award winner described it as a work of “autofiction” inspired by the breakdown of her relationship with her ex-husband David Harbour, encouraging fans to listen to it straight through without a break, rather than cherry-picking their favourite tracks.

She also took this approach when putting together the album’s accompanying tour, which saw her performing the album in its entirety, without including any other tracks on the setlist or speaking to the audience.

Advertisement

Fans were near-unanimous with their praise for the unconventional concerts, although some critics raised questions about its short runtime and her decision not to play hits or address the crowd from the stage.

Lily – who is currently on a break from her tour, which she’ll take across the pond next month – reflected on this while speaking to Perfect magazine for a recent cover piece.

Lily Allen on stage at Lollapalooza Festival in Berlin last month
Lily Allen on stage at Lollapalooza Festival in Berlin last month

Snapshot/Future Image/P Frauchiger/Shutterstock

During the interview, Lily explained that she feels like she’s playing a character when she’s on stage for her shows, saying: “I’m literally not looking for a response! And I can’t hear because my in-ears are so fucking loud. I can’t really see anything.

“I want people to enjoy themselves, for sure. But it’s interesting. Because I’m not being me, or me at the moment, I can’t manipulate them [with flattery, as singers often do during concerts].”

Advertisement

Lily continued: “I couldn’t possibly [do that]. Because then I’d have to come out of character and it would ruin the performance. I’m not saying what other people do, or what I’ve done in the past, is bad. It’s just not what’s happening here.”

“People have commented [about this tour]: ‘She doesn’t interact with the audience. Blah, blah, blah.’ I’d say to them: give me your top five audience interactions you’ve ever seen at a gig,” she added with a laugh.

Back in May, after Lily kicked off the arena leg of her tour, one journalist for the Spectator wrote on X that the star was on stage for 50 minutes, had “no support act”, spoke “not one word to the audience” and charged “£86 [for a seat] in the gods”.

At the time, Lily responded to point out that there is a support act – a string orchestra who play instrumental versions of her hits, with the audience invited to sing along in karaoke style. She also insisted the show has “always been advertised as Lily Allen Performs West End Girl”.

Advertisement

“I was a few [minutes] late as my tights were laddered and I had to change them,” the chart-topping star wrote on X. “The show is just over an hour as it’s just the album in its entirety. It’s my artistic choice not to talk to the audience, the fourth wall helps with the storytelling. Most people find it to be effective.”

Lily added: “I don’t want anyone to feel ripped off, everyone on this tour is really working very hard to give people the best show we possibly can, and I’m extremely proud of it.”

Months earlier, Lily addressed her critics after one fan claimed that the performer had become the subject of a “smear campaign” that had come “out of nowhere”.

She wrote back: “Oh it’s coming from somewhere, but we move!”

Advertisement

A subsequent social media post also saw Lily speculating that “bots” could be behind some of the negative comments being shared about her online.

Read Lily Allen’s full interview in Perfect magazine.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Sam Smith Praises Madonna For Support During Unholy Backlash

Published

on

Madonna pictured in June 2026

Sam Smith has voiced their admiration for Madonna, after she helped them through a particularly turbulent time in their career.

Back in 2022, the British musician released the Kim Petras collaboration Unholy, which hit number one in the UK upon its release.

However, despite the song’s popularity, it didn’t sit well with everyone, with certain right-wing commentators taking issue with its accompanying music video and a subsequent performance at the Grammys.

In the ensuing moral panic, some conservatives even went as far as accusing the singer of being “satanic”, after they sported an all-red ensemble complete with a top hat adorned with devil horns on stage (this crossed over into the real world when, in one TikTok clip, they were seen being heckled while out in public by someone branding them “demonic” and “sick”).

Advertisement

During a new interview with Zane Lowe for Apple Music, Sam described Madonna as the “most important artist in my life”.

Madonna pictured in June 2026
Madonna pictured in June 2026

Mike Vitelli/BFA.com/Shutterstock

“I got the chance to get to know her and communicate with her,” they enthused, describing the Queen of Pop as “my mother” and “un-fucking-real”.

“When I had the controversy happen around me with Unholy, and the stuff in the press, and the heaviness that came with that for me… I talk to current artists right now, if I meet them, and they don’t even know it happened,” Sam said.

“[But] the minute it happened, she made sure that she got through to me. She’s so aware of queer news, and what’s happening to the community, and to artists within the community. And you feel that in her music.”

Advertisement

They continued: “I feel like her music is a lifeline to queer people, and all of the eras of her, and her stamina, and how she’s always carried on and on and on, I just find it very inspiring, and I think a lot of queer people find it inspiring.”

Madonna introduced Sam and Kim on stage at the 2022 Grammys, describing them as “two incredibly talented artists” who were “forging a new path and taking the heat for all of it”.

Advertisement

“All you troublemakers out there, you need to know that your fearlessness does not go unnoticed,” she said. “You are seen, you are heard and, most of all, you are appreciated.”

Following this, Madonna and Sam recorded the duet Vulgar, on which the Vogue singer was heard delivering the immortal line: “If you fuck with Sam tonight you’re fucking with me, so watch what you say or I’ll split your banana.”

Sam then covered Madonna’s Human Nature on their Gloria world tour, while she repaid the favour by including a snippet of Unholy while performing Like A Prayer on her Celebration tour.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Farage Accused Of Using Christianity To Fuel Anti-Muslim Sentiment

Published

on

Farage Accused Of Using Christianity To Fuel Anti-Muslim Sentiment

Nigel Farage has been accused of misusing Christianity to “channel anti-Muslim feeling” by the former Archbishop of Canterbury.

Life peer Dr Rowan Williams told the New Humanist magazine there was an “inevitable scepticism these days about some claims to religious conviction”.

He said: “I suspect really that Farage and others want to channel anti-Muslim feeling, and it helps to have ‘we’re a Christian society’ to fling back. It gives a sort of ballast.”

Williams, who served as the senior bishop for the Church for England from 2002 to 2012, said he believed there were a lot of possible causes driving Christian nationalism in the UK, including “anxiety about migration, anti-Islamism”.

Advertisement

He said: “In France, that anxiety has a secular aspect, but the St George’s Cross still means something in the English imagination, which still has a Christian aspect.

“The second thing is the globalising of all political discourse. The message given at international Christian conservative gatherings is that self-respecting nationalist movements need a bit of theology injected into them.

“Ironically, for someone like Nigel Farage, it’s about trying to find a presentational strategy that allows him to be taken seriously outside England. He’s often not here, after all.

“Then again, if we’re looking for what animates Christian nationalism, I think it’s in part the very simple search for someone to blame.”

Advertisement

Farage posted on social media at Easter, saying: “The Christian values on which our country is built are something to be proud of.”

In his first election interview back in 2024, he said there were a “growing number of young people in this country who do not subscribe to British values, in fact loathe much of what we stand for”.

He later told Sky News he was talking about Muslims.

The Clacton MP also criticised an iftar – the meal eaten to break Muslims’ daily fast during Ramadan – in Trafalgar Square earlier this year, describing it as an “attempt to overtake, intimidate and dominate our way of life”.

Advertisement

Williams went on to criticise Tommy Robinson, the far-right activist whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon who claims to have taken Bible studies in jail and is now a Christian.

His Unite the Kingdom march in London in May saw demonstrators carry wooden crosses and chanting “Christ is king”.

Williams said: “There’s an inevitable scepticism these days about some claims to religious conviction, and I don’t want to give way to this. If Tommy Robinson is doing his best to lead a life of Christian discipleship, I’m very glad, but I would really want to ask him some awkward questions.

“I would ask him how attempting to lead a life of Christian discipleship squares with public rhetoric designed to produce hostility and violence.”

Advertisement

Reform UK has been approached for comment.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Doctor Warns Against Using This ‘Useless’ Washing Machine Setting

Published

on

Doctor Warns Against Using This 'Useless' Washing Machine Setting

You might already know that overloading your washing machine drum dooms your clothes to longer-lasting dampness – but did you know it could also shorten your appliance’s lifespan?

Additionally, Lenor says we should consider shaking our clothes before bunging them into the dryer, as that helps to “extract surplus water and damp”.

And apparently, the temperature at which you set your washing machine matters much more than we think, according to doctor and broadcaster Dr Xand van Tulleken.

Speaking on BBC Morning Live, he said he doesn’t “see the point” in one setting in particular, as it neither kills off germs nor saves you much money.

Advertisement

Here’s the most “useless” washing machine temperature

Dr van Tulleken started off by saying that 90°C is usually a bit excessive, as it “almost boils” your clothes.

Though it does “kill” germs, the doctor joked that “whatever’s happened” to garments that need that extreme a heat setting likely means they need to be binned anyway.

If your household has an infection like Norovirus, Dr Van Tulleken stated you’ll probably be best off washing on a 60°C cycle.

Advertisement

Then he added, “personally, I don’t see the point in 40°C… it’s too hot to be cheap, and it’s too cold to kill [germs]”.

The NHS has advised patients who spend time in hospital to wear clothes that can be washed at 60°C to avoid spreading bacteria like Clostridium difficile (C.diff).

Any lower, and the germs will likely survive.

But what if I’m not sick?

Advertisement

Most of the time, if you’re not unwell, 60°C is excessive.

But even then, Dr van Tulleken (and consumer advocacy publication Which?) say 40°C isn’t ideal.

30°C “gets the job done,” the doctor shared (Which? found that on average, switching from 40°C to 30°C saved 38% energy, or about £24 a year).

Personally, though, the doctor is a “20°C guy for everything” except his workout clothes.

Advertisement

Which? wrote that this saves 62% energy or £39 a year compared to 40°C; they recommend washing at either 20°C or 30°C where possible.

Though this may leave your washing machine drum a little less boil-wash-clean than higher temps, that’s resolved by simply running “a monthly hot maintenance wash (60°C with the machine empty and washing machine cleaner in the detergent tray)”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025