Politics
Reform candidate thanks Putin
As we’ve covered, Reform have been having a nightmare trying to sign up suitable candidates for the local elections. The problem is that anyone who’s suited to Reform is probably not well matched to broader public opinion, which is why we keep getting candidates like this:
Quite the quote. https://t.co/nDZelXynf1 pic.twitter.com/PHWHcGo9aE
— Reform Party UK Exposed 🇬🇧 (@reformexposed) April 1, 2026
Reform’s Welsh-Russian axis
John Clark is one of Reform’s candidates for the Welsh Senedd. To be absolutely fair to him, he wasn’t thanking Vladimir Putin for invading Ukraine; he was thanking him for engaging in “dialogue”:
There are still a couple of problems, of course. The first is that Putin wasn’t engaging in peace talks; he was chatting with right-wing US political commentator Tucker Carlson. When Putin has engaged in actual peace talks, he hasn’t engaged very meaningfully – hence the war raging on.
The other problem for Clark is that you can’t be thanking politicians for engaging in discussions in the UK. Remember when the media crucified Jeremy Corbyn for five years because he held talks with Hamas and referred to them as “our friends” in an effort to encourage dialogue? The right certainly played that up, so this is the bed they’ve made for themselves.
It doesn’t help that Reform have previous issues with their Welsh politicians being overly favourable to Russia. This was most notable with Nathan Gill (former leader of Reform Wales), who was sentenced to ten and a half years for taking bribes to talk positively about Russia in the European parliament.
Reform Exposed unearthed some more tweets too, including this one:
Look, we didn’t like Rishi Sunak either, but the above phrasing suggests that Clark just wanted to praise Putin. The same can be said of this:
You can’t form your opinions by taking what your opponents say and just thinking the opposite.
Sides
To be completely fair to Clark, he has talked about the war in terms like the below, which is certainly less head-banging than some of the people on either side of the war:
If Ukraine escalates, then Russia will escalate too, and the cycle of violence will continue. Far too many people have died already. It’s time to look for a diplomatic solution.
— John Clark 🏴 🇬🇧 (@TJohnClark) March 23, 2024
Digging deeper, he tweeted the following about Trump in 2024, but doesn’t seem to have said anything about Trump’s catastrophic war against Iran:
Trump is the only President in recent history that did not start any wars. Give peace a chance, Trump 2024.
— John Clark 🏴 🇬🇧 (@TJohnClark) January 16, 2024
Have the neo-cons been reduced to random name-calling? Are you upset that Trump didn’t start any wars?
— John Clark 🏴 🇬🇧 (@TJohnClark) January 16, 2024
Personally, if we’d been taking in by Trump’s ‘peace candidate’ shtick, we would have corrected the record when he started invading other countries, but that’s just us.
Clark also tweeted the following, suggesting his anti-war feelings are really pretty selective, because Trump conducted all sorts of belligerent acts in his first term:
You’re not fit to polish Trump’s boots @campbellclaret. How is that Iraq war going? Remember David Kelly, warmonger?
— John Clark 🏴 🇬🇧 (@TJohnClark) August 25, 2023
Differences
It’s obviously the case that Western nations’ relationship with Russia became unduly strained as a result of the US maintaining reflexive Cold War politics. At the same time, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was an absolute travesty. As Joe Glenton wrote for the Canary in 2022:
Less than 48 hours into Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and so much remains unclear. Will Russia occupy? Will NATO respond militarily? What are the risks of nuclear escalation? But one thing should be very apparent. Looking to either NATO or Russia in search of a good guy in all of this is deeply naïve.
On the one side we have the Russian regime. Viciously illiberal and oligarchic, it’s a model of authoritarian capitalism. Determined to reclaim its lost imperial status, it’s as willing to bomb Ukrainian cities as it is to batter its own courageous anti-war protestors off the streets of Moscow.
In NATO, we have an organisation which today functions as a beard for US imperial ambitions. It comes with a bleak history of supporting fascists in Europe and of the kind of brinkmanship which has brought us to where we are today. It’s also played a direct part in the disastrous wars in – to name just two recent examples – Libya and Afghanistan.
Reform politicians keep giving the impression that they like Russia for the same reason they like Donald Trump; because the imperial powers are the bigger kid, pushing the smaller kid around.
And let’s be real; picking on the little guy is Reform’s policy platform in a nutshell.
Featured image via World Economic Forum (Flickr)
Israel’s Knesset is about to have a second reading of an appalling, and underreported, death penalty bill. This murderous bill will be exclusive to Palestinians, yep, only Palestinians. Due to its criminal dilution of legal norms, it could give authorities a carte blanche to execute thousands of imprisoned Palestinians detained by Israel since October 7.
The bill’s wide-reaching title is: “The Prosecution of Participants in the October 7 Massacre Events.”
If that wasn’t bad enough in times when the rest of the world is moving to abolish the death penalty, Israeli policy makers are defending what they describe as the need to:
deviate from the rules of procedure and the rules of evidence.
According to the bill, this slam-dunk deviation:
is necessary for the purpose of clarifying the truth and doing justice, and does not significantly impair the fairness of the proceeding.
However, cases without evidence trash this argument, which never had legs to begin with. Palestinian defendants will also be tried in Israel’s military courts which have seen an impossible 99.7% conviction rate. This highlights, in the most sadistic way, that when there is a will, there will be a way.
Israeli leaders are drooling at the prospect of more murder—executions by hanging—genocide by alternative means. This bill is likely to be yet another way for Israel to exercise that will, under the sinister veneer of legality, to further its Zionist colonial ambitions.
Novara Media’s Rivkah Brown broke this deadly news on X:
But what’s interesting about this bill is that it proposes lowering the evidential threshold for prosecution. Read this chilling paragraph (from https://t.co/2S1o0UKwE0) pic.twitter.com/hYgbYee1t8
— Rivkah Brown (@rivkahbrown) April 1, 2026
The Dinah Report and UK complicity
Unsurprisingly, this bill becomes even more sickening and nefarious as you dig further into the detail. As Rivkah Brown highlighted on her post, this bill has been a long time in the making and preparatory work completed to make this cruel, collective punishment bill possible.
We wrote about how the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) gave £90k of taxpayers’ money to put together the Israeli report, representing a whopping 75% of the FCDO’s budget.
This blatant bias and conflict of interest should come as little to no surprise. Ever since October 7th, we have seen a concerted push by Israel and its lobby groups to manipulate data, grief and material facts in their own interest. All whilst conveniently and simultaneously demonising Palestinian resistance. If we have learned anything through this horrific 2.5 years, it is the reminder that every life matters and civilians should not pay the price for the sins of the powerful.
Similarly, Rivkah Brown argues that, since October 7, actors have made a concerted effort to manufacture a “body of literature” portraying this as a conflict unlike any other. They use that framing to claim that the destruction of evidence makes the need for evidence irrelevant.
They have also poured significant funding into producing and amplifying material that supports this narrative for a specific political purpose.
We must see this bill for what it is— a fraudulent crime by those in power who pull the levers at their disposal — including the law— to justify their genocide against Palestinians.
They have the legal right to resist their occupier, with force— a right that is protected by international law.
Nevertheless, that right for Palestinians to resist is being criminalised—no doubt an omen for the rest of the world.
UK officials follow in Israel’s footsteps
Brown further stated:
As I revealed last month, the FCDO gave £90k/120k (so 75% of its funding) to The Dinah Project’s report. The report concluded – against all existing reportage, by Amnesty, the UN and others – that sexual violence on 7 October didn’t just happen, but was “systematic”.
She also revealed the parallels in rhetoric between the Dinah Project report and this legislation working its way through the Knesset:
It is therefore difficult to view it as a coincidence that this heavily UK-funded report uses strikingly similar language and reasoning to the Knesset bill.
This alignment raises serious concerns that some UK officials may have coordinated with Israeli-linked groups in ways that risk criminalising Palestinians on a broader scale.
Such actions, if carried out, would deepen the UK’s complicity in the genocide and betrayal of Palestinian people.
As Rivkah’s subsequent post underscored, huge inferences are being used to prop up collective punishment:
A tailor-made evidence model should, the report added, collectively criminalise those who participated in the attack, not only for their own actions, but for the actions of others in the “collective mob attack”.
Collective criminalisation IS collective punishment
Collective punishment is illegal under multiple bodies of international law. Whether that be article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, or rule 103 of international humanitarian law, collective punishment is a war crime. These international legal rules play a crucial role in maintaining peace and stability, protecting civilians from punishment for acts they did not commit.
It is clear that Israel does not have sufficient evidence to attribute October 7 crimes to individual Palestinians. We have also watched Israel Occupation Forces (IOF) round up Palestinian men, including doctors and rescue workers, and imprison them. Israel has held hostage thousands of men and boys using unproven allegations of involvement in the killing of Israeli citizens and foreign nationals.
For example, Dr Abu Safiya, a Palestinian paediatrician, has been detained since December 2024, and subjected to physical and mental torture, despite having done no wrong. As Clarion India explains, his crime was:
Standing amid the ruins outside Kamal Adwan Hospital, surrounded by destruction, he walked alone in his white coat toward advancing Israeli armoured vehicles — a lone doctor facing a war machine. The image circulated widely because it captured, in a single frame, the reality of Gaza: those who heal standing unarmed before those who destroy.
We must challenge this attempt by the UK and Israel to legally justify the mass killing of innocent, oppressed and traumatised people. If we fail to act, we risk standing by as more atrocities unfold with the backing of our government.
This action constitutes a colossal crime against humanity — one that we must not forgive.
Featured image via the Canary
The National Education Union’s annual conference always provides useful insights into the concerns of the teachers present. And this year’s gathering, held in Brighton this week, was no exception. The four-day jamboree revealed that politics is of far more concern to union members than teaching and learning.
Indeed, questions actually concerning educational standards were dealt with spectacularly quickly – and the consensus was that they should be discarded. With motions passed to ban Ofsted, the schools’ inspection and regulation body, and challenging the planned statutory reading assessment for Year 8 pupils, delegates were then free to discuss the really important stuff.
First up was global conflict. America clearly looms large in the minds of the around 1,500 teachers and school-support workers present. They passed a motion condemning the US attack on Venezuela, the bombing of Iran and Trump’s actions in Cuba, which, they claim, ‘breach international law and will worsen humanitarian conditions’. But Israel got a look in, too: it was criticised for ‘aggression over Lebanon… which has killed many citizens’. Both Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have no doubt been waiting on instructions from Britain’s teachers, who think ‘there needs to be an urgent de-escalation of conflict and global tensions’.
But it is domestic politics that really gets NEU delegates hot under the collar. One motion, which passed to much applause, stated that NEU members oppose ‘all forms of racism, fascism and far-right extremism’, including ‘the divisive politics promoted by Reform UK’. Teachers, the conference promised, will throw their ‘full weight’ behind ‘stopping a Reform UK government’. Dave Davies, a teacher from east London, who seconded the motion, argued that ‘we have to rip the mask of respectability away from the far right’. ‘Nigel Farage is not a respectable politician’, Davies told the conference floor, ‘he wants to replicate what Donald Trump does in the United States and put ICE on to the streets’ (a reference to the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which presides over Trump’s deportation policies).
The same motion called on union branches to affiliate with Stand Up To Racism – a campaign group that seeks to fight fascism, but has little to say about the rise of anti-Semitism. Like so many ‘anti-racist’ organisations, it seems more concerned to stop Reform gaining ground at the next election than with actually stopping racism. Delegates also agreed that the union should support ‘school groups, districts and regions to mobilise for anti-fascist demonstrations’ by organising transport to ‘anti-right-wing counter-demonstrations’. Leigh Seedhouse, the executive member who proposed the motion, told the conference floor that ‘parties based on racism are shaping the political agenda’ across Europe and that ‘the rise of Reform UK with its relentless scapegoating of migrants is a warning’.
It is hard not to laugh at the NEU’s delusions. Members leap from an inflated sense of their own importance – dictating Trump’s foreign policy – to paranoid fantasies about fascism and ICE agents patrolling British cities. But what is not funny is the influence NEU members have on Britain’s children. The ‘fighting racism, fascism and far-right extremism’ motion also calls for the creation of anti-racist and anti-fascist teaching materials, as well as ‘literature making the case against the far right’, which would then be distributed to union members who are teachers. In other words, the NEU’s campaign against Reform will not be conducted on teachers’ own time but will also be waged in the classroom.
Another motion that promises to bring politics into the classroom calls on schools to be ‘aware of the need to support trans and nonbinary rights’. Encouraging teachers to ‘treat trans and nonbinary people with dignity and with respect’ may sound nice enough, but, in practice, showing ‘respect’ often turns out to mean forcing children to accept the use of female pronouns for a person who is very obviously male. And safeguarding alarm bells ring with the chilling statement that ‘trans and nonbinary people can regularly face abuse from family members’. The implication is that teachers should collude with gender-confused children to keep their social transition a secret from their parents.
With trans rights, criticism of America and scare-mongering about Reform on the agenda, it is hardly surprising that the conference’s headline speaker, Green Party leader Zack Polanski, received a standing ovation. He backed the abolition of Ofsted and supported the campaign against Year 8 reading tests. Alongside the promise of a ‘serious cash injection’ into schools, Polanski argued that a future Green government would provide an education ‘that genuinely equips children for the world they’re growing up into’. This, he spelt out, means ‘giving them the media literacy they need in a dizzying social-media and fake-news landscape’.
We need to be clear: calls for ‘media literacy’, whether made by Polanski or Labour’s education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, are not a demand that teachers offer a classical curriculum that could prompt knowledgeable critical reflection on the world today. Instead, fake-news spotting means bringing yet more propaganda into the classroom in order to train children to hold only teacher-approved views.
The warm reception given to Polanski reflects a shift in teachers’ voting intentions. As Daniel Kebede explained, ‘I think our membership feels that Zack speaks more for schools and education than Labour does at the moment’. But pity British schoolchildren if NEU members have their way: when it comes to the classroom, standards are out, and politics is in.
Between the Green Party and the NEU, we’ll have children who struggle to read but know to yell ‘fascist’ at Reform voters.
Joanna Williams is a spiked columnist and author of How Woke Won. Follow her on Substack: cieo.substack.com.
Zendaya has fielded countless personal questions while promoting her new film The Drama – thanks in no small part to persistent speculation that she and her long-time partner Tom Holland, recently tied the knot in person.
While she didn’t confirm the rumours during her latest interview, Zendaya did open up about how she wound up falling for her Spider-Man co-star.
The Euphoria star vividly detailed the moment during an episode of The New York Times podcast Modern Love, published on Wednesday.
After fellow The Drama actor Robert Pattinson finished arguing there’s often fear involved during breakups or an initial attraction, Zendaya added: “I think sometimes, at least in my personal experience, I found that, you know sometimes people can get kind of nervous around people? But there’s a certain feeling that I was able to experience when I knew that this is my person, because I didn’t.
“I don’t feel nervous around them, I feel really peaceful and I feel really calm, and I feel like, ‘Oh, I actually feel more nervous when I’m away from you than when I’m with you’. And that’s when I was like, ‘Ah, that’s a good sign, that’s me listening to my intuition or body’.”
Zendaya and Tom were believed to have been dating off and on for around a decade before getting engaged in late 2024.
They first met during a chemistry read for the Marvel movie Spider-Man: Homecoming in 2017, which aptly went on to star Zendaya as the romantic interest of Tom’s titular superhero character.
She also shared during the podcast that Tom had made her “feel calm” during the audition.
When asked how he did it, Zendaya said: “Just by being a nice person, you know? By making me feel comfortable.
“I mean it’s like, having to do a chemistry read for a big movie like that is – you really want the job and all these kinds of things. And yeah, he was really lovely then.”
Whether or not she and Tom have already tied the knot, as her longtime stylist and friend Law Roach alleged last month, remains unconfirmed.
Zendaya did note on the podcast, however, she does try to share her life with fans – but also keeps some things to herself.
“I just feel like for me, there is this level of a parasocial investment in my personal relationship,” she said. “I do know that I’m a public person, and so is he, and I’m also aware that we’ve grown up in front of people, and we’ve done movies where we fall in love with each other.”
“So I really do understand that, and I don’t want to dismiss that like, ‘Stay out of my business’ or whatever,” the Emmy winner continued.
“But in a lot of ways I also am a very private person — and I try my best to be able to have things for myself and for him as well.”
Tyler West is replacing Scott Mills as the host of a new Race Across The World companion podcast.
Last month, the BBC revealed that when the new season of Race Across The World launches, it would be accompanied by a video-podcast series diving into the highs and lows of what’s gone on in the hit reality show.
Race Across The World: The Detour was originally supposed to be co-presented by Mills, who took part in the second season of Celebrity Race Across The World back in 2024 alongside his now-husband, going on to win the show.
However, following the news that he has been fired by the BBC effective immediately, the series will now be hosted by fellow Celebrity Race Across The World alum Tyler West in a last-minute scheduling change.
Tyler will be joined each week by Alfie Watts, who won the regular show in 2024.
A BBC press release previously teased that The Detour would be Race Across The World’s “younger, wilder sibling, charting the ups and downs of the new series.
“Each week the podcast will welcome guests from travel-savvy creators, to comedians and celebrity fans of the show, as they dissect destinations, swap tales of adventure, and celebrate the real life stories and unforgettable journeys of Race Across The World,” the synopsis continued.
Mills’ departure from the BBC was confirmed on Monday, with the national broadcaster later saying: “In recent weeks, we obtained new information relating to Scott and we spoke directly with him. As a result, the BBC acted decisively in line with our culture and values and terminated his contracts.”
“Separately, we can confirm the BBC was made aware in 2017 of the existence of an ongoing police investigation, which was subsequently closed in 2019 with no arrest or charge being made,” a spokesperson continued.
“We are doing more work to understand the detail of what was known by the BBC at this time.”
Mills broke his silence on the matter on Wednesday night, saying: “The recent announcement that I am no longer contracted to the BBC has led to the publication of rumour and speculation. In response to this, the Metropolitan Police has made a statement, which I confirm relates to me.
“An allegation was made against me in 2016 of a historic sexual offence which was the subject of a police investigation in which I fully cooperated and responded to in 2018. As the police have stated, a file of evidence was submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service, which determined that the evidential threshold had not been met to bring charges.
“Since the investigation related to an allegation that dates back nearly 30 years and the police investigation was closed seven years ago, I hope that the public and the media will understand and respect my wish not to make any further public comment on this matter.”
The BBC has also issued an apology for failing to “follow up on” an additional allegation about Mills that was raised by a freelance journalist last year.
Hezbollah have injured at least 48 Israeli officers and soldiers whilst defending Lebanon from Israel’s illegal invasion.
BREAKING: The Israeli army says 48 Israeli officers and soldiers have been wounded in fighting in southern Lebanon over the past 24 hours.
🔴 LIVE updates: https://t.co/1Br1Hzf0B8 pic.twitter.com/iE5VjxDLZA
— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) April 1, 2026
Hezbollah also eliminated four Israeli soldiers in Southern Lebanon:
JUST IN:
Israeli army announced the deaths of 4 soldiers killed by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. pic.twitter.com/8mN4cZJm5D
— Current Report (@Currentreport1) March 31, 2026
Lebanon fights back
This takes the total number of dead soldiers that Israel has reported to 10, with 309 injured since it launched its illegal attacks.
On March 30, the IOF reported that 5 soldiers had been killed in Lebanon. However, they used 10 helicopters to evacuate those bodies. Seems a little suss?
The IDF just used 10 helicopters moments ago to evacuate dead Israeli soldiers from southern Lebanon.
Remember they only claim 5 are dead.
Hezbollah is kicking their ass.
— Ethan Levins 🇺🇸 (@EthanLevins2) March 30, 2026
Of course, we know that the true number of injured and dead terrorists must be far higher – because we cannot expect a genocidal supremacist army to ever tell the truth.
If that’s what Israel says, then the true figure must be significantly higher.
— Laura Blum (@laura8blum) April 1, 2026
Additionally, Israel is under military censorship. This means that every reporter in Israel, along with every member of the public, is prohibited from:
reporting or broadcasting any material that could reveal sensitive information or pose a threat to the country’s security interests.
This includes things like images and videos of missile strikes, along with the locations of interceptor missiles.
Some estimates suggest that Israel may have lost 1,281 soldiers during the first few weeks of its illegal attacks on Iran and Lebanon.
Not so tough now
Israeli soldiers are not so tough when they’re faced with grown adults with guns, instead of toddlers.
Like most over-confident bullies, whenever the apartheid Epstein army faces actual fighters instead of children and refugees, they get their asses kicked. https://t.co/Snl6MmpUO3
— Thamina Eff 🇵🇸 (@Thamina_F) April 1, 2026
Maybe they should have stayed at home? In Europe and the US.
Should have stayed at home. https://t.co/HG4rLQqdgI
— Dr Iain Darcy 🍉 🇮🇪 💚 (@doctoriaindarcy) April 1, 2026
Importantly, though, Hezbollah are going after Israeli soldiers, who are valid military targets under international law, especially when they are invading a sovereign country.
The IOF fuck about, the IOF find out.
Meanwhile, that same IOF are targeting civilians, medical workers, hospitals, schools, journalists, and UN workers.
Every day, the headline out of Lebanon is the same:
Hezbollah forces kill or injure scores of Israeli soldiers.
Israeli forces kill or injure scores of Lebanese civilians, journalists & medics.
And yet they want us to think Hezbollah are the “terrorists.” ok https://t.co/EHZvFJTnfW
— Zachary Foster (@_ZachFoster) April 1, 2026
Yet they want us to believe that Hezbollah are the bad guys?
‘God’s chosen people’
Why don’t ‘God’s chosen people’ on ‘God’s chosen land’ have some sort of magnetic force-field around them at all times? Where are the superpowers protecting them from these pretend terrorists?
The only thing choosing Israeli soldiers is the bullets in their chests.
I would have thought the bullets and rockets would bounce off of their bodies, similar to Superman, with God acting like a force field. This is what you would expect to happen if they are specially chosen by God, placed above the moral and physical laws governing the universe.
— Piotr Kopylowicz (@PKopylowicz) April 1, 2026
Unless every illegal settler is secretly Iron Man…
The US and Israel will NOT be honest about the number of Jewish settlers and IDF soldiers killed.
The US and Israel consistently lie and only claim “injuries.”
Have all Jewish settlers suddenly turned into ” Iron man ” who only suffer “injuries” when hit by missiles ?
— Ayu Blossom🌸 (@AyuBlossom1) April 2, 2026
Israel deserves to suffer in the same way that it has made Gaza suffer for the last two and a half years.
Not enough, we need more. We want the IDF to suffer in exactly the way they make Palestinians suffer. https://t.co/S1LWvzBu4y
— Bushra Shaikh (@Bushra1Shaikh) April 1, 2026
Israeli soldiers are clearly dropping like flies – and the sooner the better, because Israel should not exist
We may never know how many Israeli soldiers are actually dead because of Israel’s strict censorship rules. But as long as Israel is still starving, maiming, and killing innocent people, then clearly too many of them are still alive.
Featured image via Al Jazeera English/ YouTube
According to the NHS, most adults should consider taking vitamin D supplements from October to early March.
But now that the Easter eggs have been unwrapped and April Fool’s Day has passed, is it time to put the supplements down?
Not always, said Kyle Crowley, a chief product officer and nutritionist at Protein Works.
Who may still need vitamin D supplements in spring?
“It’s suggested that optimal exposure to sunlight is between five and 30 minutes a day. Therefore, if you don’t hit these requirements each day, you may need to consider supplementing,” said Crowley.
That rises to 25 minutes a day for people with darker skin tones.
“In fact, studies show that nearly half of UK adults have below-optimal levels of vitamin D. Most surprisingly, adults aged 18–29 have the lowest average. So, if you’re a student studying indoors or working all day indoors, this lifestyle will limit your daily exposure and taking vitamin D would be recommended.”
The NHS said that “People at high risk of not getting enough vitamin D, all children aged 1 to 4, and all babies (unless they’re having more than 500ml of infant formula a day) should take a daily supplement throughout the year.”
They include people who are not often outdoors (e.g. those in care homes or who are housebound), those who wear clothes that cover most or all of their skin while outdoors, and those with darker skin in that “at-risk” category.
Crowley advised taking vitamin D3 supplements if you choose to, instead of vitamin D2 kinds, as vitamin D3 seems better for our immune systems.
What if I’m not sure whether I need vitamin D?
“It is important to note that there is a difference between having a vitamin D deficiency and being below optimal levels. A deficiency, which is usually a vitamin D level below 25 nmol/L, should be addressed by a medical professional,” Crowley stated.
“The best way to find out about your vitamin D levels is to get a blood test. This is definitely worth it if you tend to get ill often, or generally feel like your health is not at its best.”
The NHS’ vitamin D benchmarks are:
-
below 25 nmol/L – Deficient
-
25-50 nmol/L – Insufficient
-
50-75 nmol/L – Adequate
-
75 nmol/L or above – Optimum.
How much vitamin D should I take?
Don’t take vitamin D supplements if you don’t need them, as too much over a long period of time can lead to hypercalcaemia.
- Babies (0-12 months) – 8.5-10 mcg/day (340-400 IU/day)
- Children (1 year and over) – 10 mcg/day (400 IU/day)
- Adults (including pregnant or breastfeeding people) – 10 mcg/day (400 IU/day).
Politics
CAAT condemns conviction of peaceful protest organisers as part of ongoing assault on civil liberties
Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) has spoken out following the conviction of Palestine Solidarity Campaign director Ben Jamal and Stop the War Coalition vice-chair Chris Nineham. They were convicted on 1 April of public order offences at Westminster magistrates court. The charges related to a peaceful protest in January.
Additionally, district judge Daniel Sternberg convicted Jamal of ‘incitement’, claiming that his speech at the peaceful protest breached “lawfully imposed conditions”.
The Metropolitan police had originally allowed the 18 January protest to take place but then reversed its decision. It cited spurious claims of “cumulative impact” on Jewish Londoners. The reversal came after lobbying by pro-Israel individuals and groups, including the Jewish Leadership Council.
On the day of the illegal US-Israeli aggression on Iran, the Jewish Leadership Council expressed its support for the unprecedented bombing campaign, claiming it “will make the world a safer place.”
CAAT speaks out on political policing
CAAT notes that the conditions the Met imposed were far from lawful. They prohibited peaceful protesters from gathering outside the BBC’s office to protest its systematic editorialising in favour of Israel.
As Netpol pointed out in a recent report titled How Repression Became Routine, police – specifically, the Met – are exercising powers beyond or ahead of lawful authority. Cumulative disruption powers, for example, have yet to pass through parliament.
Moreover, in reflection of the government’s zeal for suppressing anti-genocide protest, police use of powers to restrict assemblies in 2024–25 rose by 230% across Britain.
As part of the trial against Jamal and Nineham, district judge Sternberg threw out a “no case to answer” defence. However, Sternberg curiously declined to give reasons for doing so.
The 18 January protest was designed to start or end at BBC headquarters in Portland Place to protest against the broadcaster’s coverage of the Israeli genocide in Gaza. The BBC’s systematic bias, which downplays Israeli crimes against humanity, while dehumanising its Palestinian victims, has provoked documented turmoil at the organisation.
CAAT notes that the zeal with which the police and Crown have pursued peaceful protesters demonstrating against the UK-backed Israeli genocide stands in contrast to its gross inaction against UK nationals serving in the Israeli Occupation Forces, as well as executives of companies providing weapons to Israel.
In February the Public Interest Law Centre, supported by CAAT, submitted a detailed complaint to Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command (SO15). This asked it to open a criminal investigation into four current and former British directors of Elbit Systems UK Ltd for possible complicity in war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Gaza. No response, or acknowledgement, has come from the Met.
A spokesperson for CAAT said:
As members of an anti-genocide movement proud to share its platform with Ben Jamal and Chris Nineham, we are dismayed at Westminster magistrate court’s decision to convict them in a trial that should never have taken place.
Jamal and Nineham should be feted for their service to humanity, and opposition to crimes against it. Yet, in this dire state of affairs, our government gets away with supporting Israel’s systematic slaughter of Palestinians, the ongoing theft of their land, and providing a steady stream of murder weapons, while prosecuting those protesting against it. The Met police’s failure to even acknowledge the Public Interest Law Centre complaint against Elbit directors, over possible complicity in war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Gaza, shows just how politicised the police has become.
Featured image via the Canary
Race Across the World returns for its sixth series on Thursday night, with five new intrepid teams taking on the journey of a lifetime in the hopes of getting their hands on a hefty cash prize.
This time around, the pairs must race more than 12,000km across Europe and Asia, taking in the sights of Italy, Greece, Türkiye, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia. With no smartphones, internet access or bank cards, the duos are armed with nothing but the cash equivalent of flying the same route, in the hopes of reaching the finish point before their time or money runs out.
As fans get ready for the exciting launch show, here are those taking on the challenge of the most extreme race to date in this year’s series of Race Across The World…
Jo and Kush
Childhood best friends from Liverpool, Jo and Kush, are the youngest duo in the race, both aged just 19. Still living at home, and fresh from finishing their A-levels, the pair are taking on independence in the most extreme way.
Both at a crossroads in their lives, the two thought Race Across The World would be a great opportunity to travel before going to uni.
“When the opportunity came up, we thought it would be a fantastic experience and something we could look back on and learn from,” Kush said.
Though they may be young, they have some experience travelling, as Kush has spent three months backpacking through Thailand – although the idea of making their way across Europe and Asia without their phones will no doubt still come as a shock to the duo.
Jo and Kush hope their social skills and ability to talk to strangers will help them on this mammoth journey, although it sounds like they are far more concerned with enjoying new experiences than winning the competition.
“I believe hardship builds personality and this is a very niche but intense situation so coming out of the experience with a bit more maturity and different perspective on life – it’s not just Liverpool,” Kush said.
Katie and Harrison
Katie, a 21-year-old account manager, and her 23-year-old brother, finance assistant Harrison, hope their opposing personalities will help them during the race.
Harrison wanted to join the show to push himself and his sister out of their comfort zones. The competitive siblings have their eyes on the prize and think their money-management skills will help them cross the finish line first.
Their weakness? Harrison might want to blow their limited budget on food.
“I think mine will be hunger, or not even hunger but just wanting to eat,” he claimed when asked about his biggest challenge.
While competitive, neither sibling is very adventurous, so Race Across The World promises to broaden their perspective and build their confidence as travellers.
“The motivation isn’t the money at the end, it’s to try and live a different life for a couple of months and just experience everything, and if we can win it whilst doing it, that is great,” Harrison added.
Hilariously, one of the items Harrison brought on his journey was a list of Man United fixtures, so he knew when to ask people for the football scores on his travels.
Molly and Andrew
Junior doctor Molly wants to prove to her geography teacher dad, Andrew, that she’s more capable than he gives her credit for.
For Andrew, backpacking is a lifelong dream that the 54-year-old has never had the time or money to complete. While travelling on the cheap was his wife’s nightmare, he finally gets to live out his dream with his daughter.
Their strengths and weaknesses on this trip might be the same, as 23-year-old Molly is very sociable and chatty – but her dad worries that he might not be able to keep her quiet!
“I kind of just go and lead by directness, and I need to rein that in every now and then, but Molly is quite good at reining that in for me,” Andrew explained, but admitted that it can balance out his quiet personality.
He added: “I can sometimes get caught in my own world instead of externalising it which in some ways is good, but I need to work on it.”
While the duo are inexperienced travellers, they hope their competitive edge and strong father-daughter relationship will help them take the lead in the competition.
However, Molly does worry about being away from her beloved celebrity gossip and hair-dryer.
Puja and Roshni
Cousins Puja and Roshni spent their twenties building successful careers in London, but are looking for some adventure now they’re in their early 30s.
Puja, a big fan of Race Across The World, was inspired to sign up after hitting a career block and feeling like her life was passing her by too quickly.
“I think living in London and having a job, you kind of live your life in fast forward, and then before you know it, you’re 50 years old,” she admitted.
Doctor Puja had previously backpacked, and her software engineer cousin Roshni has also travelled around Cuba, so both were experienced at visiting a country without fancy hotels or pre-planned itineraries.
Because of their jobs, Puja and Roshni feel confident racing under pressure and think their strengths will be keeping to the tight budget and staying organised.
Although a win would be great for the cousins, the duo are more concerned with making the most of their time off, spending much-needed time together, and learning about new cultures.
Puja explained: “Being able to accomplish that and get to the end, I think is going to be a massive accomplishment and proof to both of us that we can pretty much do anything we set our mind to. The other bits of it are just like what we learn from local people, from different lifestyles, different cultures, and learning more about how life can be a lot slower than what we live at home.”
Mark and Margo
Lastly, there is the unlikely duo of 66-year-old Mark and his 59-year-old sister-in-law, Margo. The retired London-based architect and the Liverpudlian hypnotherapist have had a fractious relationship for the last four decades, but recently became close after the death of Margo’s sister and Mark’s wife.
Margo signed the pair up for Race Across The World to celebrate their late loved one.
“We’ve been through this experience with losing my big sister and him losing his wife,” she said. “It seemed like a celebratory thing that we could do together. This was a new journey that could be exciting and like a renewal.”
Both are adventurous and don’t believe in living life with limits, having interrailed in their youth, as well as skydived, hiked, and done… well… pretty much any other dangerous thing they could think of.
“There isn’t a limit on what we’d have a go at. We’re going to live as dangerously as they’ll allow us,” Margot revealed.
Mark and Margo admit they are in it to win it, with a track record of travelling the world, although the duo do admit they can get a little cranky when hungry and tired, and Mark fears he could crumble under pressure.
Race Across The World airs on Thursday nights at 8pm on BBC One.
On Wednesday 1 April, Donald Trump delivered one of the worst speeches of his career — and this was no April Fool’s.
The White House has removed this video from their social media channels.
But not before we could post it. https://t.co/arlnXPVhc2
— Headquarters (@HQNewsNow) April 2, 2026
The above is really just the tip of the iceberg too.
Bombs not babies
In the clip above, Trump starts talking about daycare but progresses to the national health insurance systems of Medicare and Medicaid (emphasis added):
the United States can’t take care of daycare. That has to be up to a state.
We can’t take care of daycare. We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people. We’re fighting wars.
We can’t take care of daycare.
You got to let a state take care of daycare, and they should pay for it too. They should pay. They have to raise their taxes, but they should pay for it. And we could lower our taxes a little bit to them to make up for it.
But it’s not possible for us to take care of daycare. Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things. They can do it on a state basis. You can’t do it on a federal.
We have to take care of one thing, military protection.
We have to guard the country.
As most people now realise, the US isn’t ‘guarding the homeland’—it’s instead doing the opposite to other countries.
If America stopped waging forever wars, it could easily afford daycare and universal health coverage. It could probably afford to give everyone in the world healthcare with how much they spend on war (set to be $1.5tn by 2027).
Even the administration is starting to realise that its military endeavours aren’t money well spent:
SECRETARY RUBIO: Why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question. Why do we send trillions of dollars and have all of these American forces stationed in the region, if in our time of need, we won’t be allowed to use those bases? pic.twitter.com/DdYahXhli0
— Department of State (@StateDept) April 1, 2026
Trump had more to say too.
Bad to worse
As the Majority Report’s Emma Vigeland sarcastically highlighted, Trump admitted that he basically likes anyone who sucks up to him—no matter how repellant they are (presumably he’s thinking about Benjamin Netanyahu):
This is so moving https://t.co/NG3QuaQOcF
— Emma Vigeland (@EmmaVigeland) April 1, 2026
Having failed to achieve any of his objectives in the Iran war, Trump is now asking his allies to clean up his mess:
Trump on re-opening the Strait of Hormuz: “Let France do it, they get a lot of oil from the strait. Let the Europeans do it. Let South Korea, who is not helpful to us, by the way…Let South Korea do it. Let Japan do it… This was not part of what I wanted to do.” pic.twitter.com/yOcweaBOcW
— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) April 1, 2026
Trump gave an idea of why the war has gone so badly:
Absolute bombshell confession! Trump casually admits on camera that he assassinated 88 Iranian leaders “by accident” while they were voting for a new regime. He is openly bragging about mass murder and illegal regime change. This is a blatant war crime! pic.twitter.com/uBR8sKpogu
— Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) April 1, 2026
Trump also did some race science:
This would have been an impeachably scandalous thing for a president to say even a decade ago. https://t.co/rM56hI8cjL
— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@ReichlinMelnick) April 1, 2026
This is the same guy who has repeatedly bragged about passing cognition tests because he thinks they’re testing his intelligence — not whether he has dementia.
Shocking but not unsurprising
While the things Trump says are constantly unprecedented, we’re at a point now where nothing really shocks.
Of course he’d launch a stupid war and then bail when it got too much.
Of course he’d be the politician to finally admit the US prioritises death over health.
Of course he’d go off on some racist tangent that has nothing to do with the speech at hand.
As grim as this all is, hopefully it makes Americans realise their country is not a force for good, and that this is a situation it can’t keep repeating.
Featured image via the Canary
Five years after the implementation of the Police Race Action Plan (PRAP), progress has been patchy, slow, and all-too-easily reversed. Worse still, it’s been overly dependant on “individual goodwill”, rather than a true commitment to change across the force.
That’s according to the final report from the Independent Scrutiny and Oversight Board (ISOB), whose job was to oversee the PRAP. It also marks the end of both the PRAP as a standalone programme, and the ISOB itself.
As ever when we write on police racism at the Canary, the report observed that forces used inquiries and action plans as a substitute for real change.
The report drew on 36 interviews with civil organisations, community leaders and policing professionals. It found that, in spite of everything, the very institutional racism of the police is still a point of contention. In fact, just 6 of the 44 individual forces covered by the PRAP had even deigned to acknowledge their institutional racism.
‘That commitment has not yet been met’
Abimbola Johnson, ISOB chair, said:
Five years ago, policing committed to improving outcomes for Black communities. That commitment has not been met. Progress has been slow, uneven and too dependent on individual effort rather than institutional change.
The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing established the PRAP back in 2020. It followed the police murder of George Floyd in the US, and the consequential wave of international Black Lives Matter demonstrations.
Ostensibly, the PRAP aimed to improve policing for Black people — both the public and within the police. However, that promise has not materialised. Johnson went on to state that:
Without properly enforced legal obligations, a robust inspection framework and clear consequences for failure, progress on race equity within policing will remain partial and reversible. This mirrors the pattern of previous reforms, dating back to Scarman and Macpherson. Black communities now deserve structural accountability. Government and policing must decide whether to deliver it or allow reform to stall again.
Final findings
As these reports and inquiries have found repeatedly, the single most significant barrier to progress is the racist culture of the police. There’s no external framework or imposed solution that can fix a system that doesn’t want to change.
And make no mistake — this is a systemic problem. Whilst individual police show shocking and flagrant racism, that bigotry is also embedded within the structures of policing. As such, any framework that treats racism as an individual problem in the forces will inevitably fail to make meaningful impact.
Likewise, race and racism cannot be understood within a vacuum. Police understanding of intersectionality remains a “significant and under-addressed gap.” Failure to address this means that the greatest harms will inevitably fall on multiple marginalised individuals.
The report also found that the single biggest driver of real change was the commitment of police leadership. When senior leaders were visibly committed to anti-racism, the forces under them showed greater progress. Conversely, where leaders’ commitment was lacking or clearly performative, nothing improved.
Alongside this, the police have been far better at making plans to tackle racism than actually delivering change. However, and far too often, these plans are spoken about as if they are “the change.” Repeatedly and consistently, actual impact has fallen short of the stated aims.
As such, it’s both unsurprising and appalling that Black communities still can’t trust the police. The report stated plainly that forces can’t built this trust through words and gestures of goodwill. Rather, they must show a real and sustained change in their behaviour before community attitudes can improve.
Progress ‘is now being reversed’
Regarding the ISOB’s final findings, Andy George – leader of the National Black Police Association – stated that:
After more than £10m of investment, it has failed to deliver on its core aim: improving the experience of policing for Black people.
The reality is the environment is becoming more toxic and the progress made since the Macpherson report is now being reversed.
The report itself indicated that any lasting progress is undermined by the utter lack of statutory accountability in making change. It made clear that:
Without legal duties, enforceable standards and independent inspection, progress depends entirely on goodwill and voluntary programs, leading to the PRAP inevitably being de-prioritised and treated as an ‘add-on’.
Both illustrating and compounding this issue, the end of the PRAP and ISOB, leaves absolutely no independent oversight in place. As such, the report urged the Home Office to:
establish and fund independent scrutiny, mandate national data standards, and embed race equity within inspection and performance frameworks.
We at the Canary have lost count of the number of times that new reports, new reviews, independent external and internal enquiries, and public bodies have highlighted and exposed institutional police racism, and the utter lack of willingness to change.
Time and again, we’ve watch police trot out their plans to fix racism, then sit back and pretend that the plan was the work itself.
So, we sign off as just as we have before. How many times do we have to write this same article?
UK police are racist because racism is embedded in the very core of their mission. It’s not one bad apple. It’s not one bad barrel. Its root and branch, tree and orchard.
Featured image via NPCC
Sargent Electrical Services starts work on 60-job Beverley factory
Tokenization Value Hinges on Liquidity, Not Novelty
Collective punishment confused for ‘law’
-
Business7 days agoInstagram, YouTube Found Responsible for Teen’s Mental Health Struggle in Historic Ruling
-
NewsBeat6 days agoThe Story hosts event on Durham’s historic registers
-
Tech7 days agoIntercom’s new post-trained Fin Apex 1.0 beats GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 at customer service resolutions
-
Sports6 days agoSweet Sixteen Game Thread: Tide vs Michigan
-
Entertainment3 days ago
Fans slam 'heartbreaking' Barbie Dream Fest convention debacle with 'cardboard cutout' experience
-
Entertainment5 days agoLana Del Rey Celebrates Her Husband’s 51st Birthday In New Post
-
Crypto World2 days ago
Dems press CFTC, ethics board on prediction-market insider trades
-
Crypto World17 hours agoGold Price Prediction: Worst Month in 17 Years fo Save Haven Rock
-
Tech3 days agoThe Pixel 10a doesn’t have a camera bump, and it’s great
-
Sports2 days agoTallest college basketball player ever, standing at 7-foot-9, entering transfer portal
-
Tech2 days agoEE TV is using AI to help you find something to watch
-
Fashion4 days agoAmazon Sundays: Soft Spring Layers
-
Tech3 days agoApple will hide your email address from apps and websites, but not cops
-
Tech2 days agoFlipsnack and the shift toward motion-first business content with living visuals
-
Tech2 days agoHow to back up your iPhone & iPad to your Mac before something goes wrong
-
Politics3 days agoShould Trump Be Scared Strait?
-
Crypto World3 days agoU.S. rule change may open trillions in 401(k) funds to crypto
-
Fashion7 days agoEn Vogue in Brown Leather and Tailored Neutrals by Atelier Savoir, Styled by J Bolin
-
Fashion7 days agoWhat Are Your Favorite T-Shirts for the Weekend?
-
Business6 days agoChinese universities with military links bought Super Micro servers with restricted AI chips
You must be logged in to post a comment Login