Politics
The House Opinion Article | The North Sea still matters

4 min read
North Sea extraction won’t bring down energy bills or fund government subsidies. But, done responsibly, it has a role to play in our national security.
For decades, China has realised the importance of energy security to its long-term success. It increased electrification, with a corresponding rise in domestic renewables and a massive increase in strategic oil and gas reserves.
Meanwhile, the UK has failed to learn the lessons of energy crises dating back to the 1970s. The dual shocks of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East present an opportunity to correct this.
These events have shown in the starkest terms that relying on global markets alone leaves the UK dangerously exposed to external shocks. Energy security is why the government and the oil and gas industry must abandon short-term, distracting arguments around price and tax revenues, and work together.
The physical protection of energy infrastructure is central to national resilience and our deterrence posture. In 2024, the UK relied on imports for 43.8 per cent of its primary energy, up sharply from 28 per cent in 2020, reflecting a significant rise in dependence on external suppliers.
Domestic oil and gas production fell to a record low, declining 6.5 per cent year on year, as output from the UK’s mature continental shelf continued to contract. Production is now around 20 per cent of its 2000 level. Meanwhile, UK gas consumption in 2024 reached 689 TWh, compared to domestic production of just 344 TWh, leaving a substantial structural deficit.
In a world of rising geopolitical tension, that deficit is a strategic weakness. A stable, managed level of North Sea output is not about returning to past production peaks; it is about ensuring the UK retains sovereign access to critical energy supplies when global markets tighten, or hostile states attempt to disrupt or attack our country.
Offshore Energies UK accepts that increased production in North Sea oil and gas would have no meaningful impact on UK energy prices, as that product is sold on an international market, which dictates the price. A secondary claim that increased production would generate tax receipts to bring down energy prices is also questionable. Research by the University of Oxford found that even in the implausible scenario of the UK being able to maximise North Sea oil and gas and use all revenues to subsidise lower energy bills, the impact would be limited, a maximum of £82 per year off a household bill.
However, there are two reasons the future of North Sea oil and gas remains critical and should be supported.
First, given the volatility and increased tension around the world, the government should explore an agreement to allow increased extraction with a binding commitment that a sufficient reserve is created against future shocks and, in the event of a crisis, North Sea oil and gas would be provided to UK markets for a fixed, lower price to protect households and businesses.
Second, we must fully bridge the skills gap between current oil and gas and a more secure renewables future. Around 154,000 workers are employed across the UK’s offshore energy sector. These are well-paid and highly technical jobs protected by trade unions.
The UK recently secured a record 14.7 GW of new renewable capacity, enough to power up to 16m homes. The UK now has an unprecedented acceleration in renewable deployment and a major reinforcement of the UK’s long-term energy security and resilience.
This represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to build careers in high-skill, high-wage, union-protected industries. But that opportunity only exists if we preserve the workforce pipeline built by the North Sea.
Skills in the North Sea oil and gas supply chain are directly transferable to the renewable system: subsea engineering, marine operations, fabrication, grid upgrades and home construction. Yet the oil and gas workforce risks falling to between 57,000–71,000 by the early 2030s. Losing that capability would weaken our security and our ability to deliver large-scale clean energy projects.
A stable tax regime matters too. That is why the Oil and Gas Price Mechanism should replace the Energy Profits Levy, supporting investment while ensuring the public benefit when prices are high. The oil and gas industry should be working with government to make the case that a secure, responsibly managed North Sea is essential to national resilience and deterrence, and is the bridge to the skills we need for the UK’s renewable future.
Graeme Downie is the Labour MP for Dunfermline & Dollar
Politics
Protests confront tourism and aviation for Housing Action Days
Protests across at least 10 cities have highlighted the harms of ‘touristification’.
Particularly through its reliance on aviation, the tourism industry is driving displacement, deepening housing crises and fueling climate breakdown worldwide.
Demonstrations were seen in Barcelona, Palma and San Sebastián (Spain), Belfast (Northern Ireland), Lisbon (Portugal), Malolos (Philippines), Marseille and Paris (France), Mexico City (Mexico) and Vienna (Austria).
Worldwide action
From marches and performances to blockades and direct actions, communities resisted the transformation of neighbourhoods into ‘playgrounds for the rich’.
Across the world, long-term residents are being priced out. Urban and coastal areas are also reshaped for tourists and multinational companies.
International tourism relies heavily on air travel, one of the fastest-growing sources of carbon emissions. Backed by cheap flights and expanding air routes, this model privatises public land, drives up rents and undermines local economies, pushing communities into increasingly precarious conditions.
Protesters stressed that touristification and aviation are intertwined crises, driven by a system that prioritises profit over people and the planet.
World Cup of dispossession
In Mexico, protesters denounced the impacts of large-scale events like the FIFA World Cup. They called it the “World Cup of dispossession”, promoting local displacement, private interests and megaprojects instead of human rights, such as housing, water and dignified work.
In Barcelona, Palma, San Sebastián, Belfast and Vienna, demonstrators called for an end to the expansion of short-term tourist accommodation. This includes listings on platforms like AirBnB, which they argue drive up housing costs and accelerate gentrification.
In Marseille, protests highlighted the social and environmental impacts of overtourism.
In Malolos, fisherfolk and community members opposed the construction of the new Manila International Airport, which is driving displacement and the loss of livelihoods.
‘Fewer planes, more homes’ was a slogan seen in Paris and in Lisbon, where protesters formed a red line to oppose the conversion of a city-centre building into a hotel.
Drawing a red line
Inês Teles, spokesperson for the global network Stay Grounded, said:
We need to draw a red line. We must stop airport expansion, reduce air traffic, limit short-term tourist accommodation and make housing a right, not a commodity. We are united in the fight for affordable, accessible housing for all and against the forces that profit from our homes, displace people and destroy our planet. Our communities and the planet are not for sale.
These actions took place during the Housing Action Days (23–29 March), a global week of mobilisation with over 150 actions in 96 cities, demanding housing justice on a liveable planet.
Featured image via Stay Grounded
Politics
Starmer Shrugs Off Trump’s Threat To Leave Nato
Keir Starmer has shrugged off Donald Trump’s threat to leave Nato by defending the alliance and insisting Britain will not be joining the Iran war.
The US president told The Telegraph America’s membership within the organisation is “beyond reconsideration” after his allies refused to back his offensive in the Middle East.
Trump said: “I was never swayed by Nato. I always knew they were a paper tiger, and Putin knows that too, by the way.”
He expressed disbelief that his allies have not backed the US’s attacks, saying: “Beyond not being there, it was actually hard to believe. And I didn’t do a big sale. I just said, ‘Hey’, you know, I didn’t insist too much. I just think it should be automatic.
“We’ve been there automatically, including Ukraine. Ukraine wasn’t our problem. It was a test, and we were there for them, and we would always have been there for them. They weren’t there for us.”
“You don’t even have a navy,” the president said of the UK. “You’re too old and had aircraft carriers that didn’t work.”
Asked if he thinks Starmer should spend more on defence, the president said: “I’m not going to tell him what to do. He can do whatever he wants. It doesn’t matter.
“All Starmer wants is costly windmills that are driving your energy prices through the roof.”
But in a press conference on Wednesday, the prime minister made it clear that he still supports the defence alliance – and wrote off Trump’s attacks as “noise”.
He said: “Nato is the single most effective military alliance the world has ever seen, and it has kept us safe for many decades and we are fully committed to Nato.
“Whatever the pressure on me and others, whatever the noise, I am going to act in the British national interest in all the decisions that I make.
“That’s why I have been absolutely clear that this is not our war and we are not going to get dragged into it.
“I am equally clear that when it comes to defence and security and our economy future, we have to have closer ties with Europe.”
He confirmed that the government will soon announce a further summit with EU leaders as the UK works closer with its allies on the continent.
Politics
UK Chancellor Admits She Is ‘Angry’ With Trump For Starting War In Iran
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has admitted she is “angry” at Donald Trump for starting the war in Iran.
Iranian troops have effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz ever since the US president decided to bomb Iran in late February.
Closing the major oil shipping lane has sent oil prices rising and rocked the global economy.
The president has attacked allies, particularly the UK, for not supporting his efforts.
He has called the Royal Navy “too old” and threatened to pull out of Nato after claiming the defence organisation has not given him “automatic” backing.
But Keir Starmer has held his own, reiterating on Wednesday that Britain would not be “dragged” into the conflict – while also warning that economic strains lie ahead.
Speaking to Radio 2′s Jeremy Vine, Reeves went further and said she was “angry” over Trump’s decision to bomb Iran.
She said: “I’m angry that Donald Trump has chosen to go to war in the Middle East – a war that there’s not a clear plan of how to get out of it.
“It’s why we didn’t want to enter this.
“Yes it will have implications for our economy, I get that.
“We are monitoring very closely what’s happening – trying to bring the oil and gas into the UK so that those supplies are there and get the prices down. We are monitoring the situation very carefully.”
“We are preparing – as you would expect me to be – for every single eventuality to make sure there alongside people, standing beside them, keeping costs down for everyone.”
The White House is trying to find an off-ramp to end the conflict and Trump claims Iran has asked for a ceasefire.
The president also told Reuters that the US will be “out of Iran pretty quickly” now Iran are supposedly “incapable” of using a nuclear weapon.
Iran has denied the claim and say the strait is “fully” under the control of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Subscribe to the Commons People podcast
The HuffPost UK politics team take a look at the week in Westminster and the repercussions of the motions and personality clashes. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Audioboom, Google Podcasts, Deezer and more.
Politics
The Best Supermarket Easter Eggs From M&S, Aldi, Lidl, More
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI – prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
That’s right, dear reader – if you want to get your Easter egg shopping done, it’s getting down to the crunch (pun intended).
It’s now officially less than a week until Easter, and you’d best believe the eggs will be flying off the shelves.
But when it comes to picking the right one, we’re all virtually drowning in different choices.
Between half eggs, loaded eggs, traditional eggs, and eggs that aren’t even really shaped like eggs at all, it’s a mountainous task.
That’s why we at HuffPost UK have bravely put our blood sugar levels on the line to test as many supermarket eggs as we possibly could before Easter.
Want to know which we thought were the best? We’ve laid it all out right here for you, ranked by taste, texture, and value for money.
M&S Easter Eggs – Reviewed by Lifestyle Writer Amy Glover
“I was skeptical. I was wrong. This viral custard cream-shaped ‘egg’ smells amazing, and the clotted cream flavour of the inside is properly delicious; like nothing I’ve eaten. The crushed custard creams inside made a perfect texture contrast, too.”
Flavour: 9.5
Texture: 9.5
Value: 9.5
Overall score: 9.5
Tesco Easter Eggs – Reviewed by Contributor Aidan Milan
Waitrose Easter Eggs – Reviewed by Parents Editor Tasha Hinde
“First up, this isn’t really an egg. It’s more like a flat slab of chocolate in an oval shape. This looks expensive (like something you’d get from a posh chocolatier), and it tastes it too. I loved the creaminess of the ruby chocolate juxtaposed with the tanginess of the cherries and raspberries. It’s not sickly, just a fruity slab of deliciousness – in fact, very moreish. The texture might feel a little odd to milk chocolate egg purists thanks to the addition of fruit, but the flavour more than makes up for it.”
Flavour: 9Texture: 7Value: 6
Overall score: 7.5
“Fans of almond croissants will enjoy this Easter egg, which is certainly the most eye-catching of the bunch thanks to its unique croissant shape. The almond flavour is there, but it’s subtle. I like the crunch of the nutty bits buried among the rich blonde chocolate. This is an extravagant one for sure, but also quite sickly, so it’ll last you a good few weeks.”
Flavour: 8.5Texture: 9Value: 6.5
Overall score: 8
“I think this is my favourite as it’s not too sickly and it’s the one I find myself coming back to whenever I walk past the kitchen. The egg itself is smooth milk chocolate with a decorative section of crunchy salted caramel pearls on the front. The chocolate also has bits of salted caramel pieces within it, so even when you’ve polished off the delicious pearls, you still get that caramel hit in amongst the rest of the chocolate. This isn’t trying too hard, and IMO, that’s the best way to be. It’s also the best value Waitrose egg at just over a fiver.”
Flavour: 10Texture: 10Value: 9.5
Overall score: 10
Morrisons Easter Eggs – Reviewed by Contributor Aidan Milan
“This is a really solid egg with a failsafe flavour combo – who doesn’t like salty pretzel, caramel, and honeycomb? Unfortunately, I taste-tested it at the same time as another caramel, pretzel and honeycomb flavoured egg that blows this one (and most of the other eggs I tried) out of the water.”
Flavour: 8Texture: 9Value: 9
Overall score: 8.5
“Now this egg is great if your sweet tooth knows no bounds. For me, it’s a little too much, between the layers of chocolate and the thick caramel sitting at the bottom. But the crunch is very satisfying, and it’s one I’m sure I’ll plug away at one bite at a time.”
Flavour: 6.5Texture: 9Value: 8
Overall score: 8
Lidl Easter Eggs – Reviewed by Lifestyle Writer Amy Glover
ASDA Easter Eggs – Reviewed by Contributor Aidan Milan
“This is a pretty simple, straightforward egg – the dark chocolate complements the raspberry, which is no surprise at all. If dark chocolate is your favourite flavour and you like to keep things unfussy, you could do a lot worse! Unrelated: They really missed a trick not calling this range ‘eggceptional.’”
Flavour: 8.5Texture: 8.5Value: 5.5
Overall score: 7.5
“This vegan egg was another firm favourite of mine – yes, even compared to all the other non-vegan/free-from eggs I tried. Granted, without the milk, the flavour of the chocolate was a little on the thin side, but I’ve always had a weakness for cherry bakewells, and this egg has the flavour and the texture down pat.”
Flavour: 9Texture: 9.5Value: 9.5
Overall score: 9.5
Aldi Easter Eggs – Reviewed by Parents Editor Tasha Hinde
“This is oddly my fave Aldi egg (although maybe it’s not that odd as I bloody love a biscuit). It’s visually a treat to look at, and the white chocolate is creamy and goes really well with the raspberry flavour layer. It’s not sickly – even my partner comments on how tasty it is. Big fan!”
Flavour: 9.5Texture: 9Value: 9
Overall score: 9
“Expect Belgian milk chocolate with an extremely sweet biscuity centre where you’re hit with caramel, blond chocolate and fudge flavours with crunchy biscuit textures. There’s a lot going on – I’m not a huge fan of the milk chocolate, but the centre is tasty if you love all those sweeter ‘millionaire’ flavours. It’s sickly though (and I’m a sweet tooth!). It’s just as well there’s only half an egg in there, as it’ll take me weeks to get through this. One bite at a time is enough for me.”
Flavour: 5Texture: 6.5Value: 6.5
Overall score: 6

Joanna Kosinska via Unsplash
Moser Roth Pistachio Layer Egg
[Editor’s note: there’s no online link to this yet!]
“If you love pistachio everything, this is the egg for you. Expect a thick layer of smooth milk chocolate, followed by a white chocolate and pistachio inner layer. The pistachio is nutty and creamy, with a touch of sweetness thanks to the white chocolate. The flavours work well and don’t overpower each other. As the chocolate is thick, you might need a hammer to crack it open, but once you’re in, you won’t be disappointed.”
Flavour: 7.5Texture: 9.5Value: 7
Overall score: 8
Politics
Italy fail to qualify for third consecutive World Cup
Football in Italy is experiencing one of its darkest periods after the national team failed to qualify for the 2026 World Cup, missing the tournament for the third consecutive time. This has been described by international media reports as an unprecedented ‘historic collapse’ for one of the pillars of the game.
According to Reuters, the latest elimination has sparked grief and anger in Italy, with reports of ‘tears and national shock.’ The Associated Press, meanwhile, considers this a ‘new normal’ for a team that was once the world’s dominant force.
Italy face a deepening crisis
Italy’s failure is no longer a passing event, but rather a continuous decline since their 2006 World Cup victory. They were eliminated in the group stage in 2010 and 2014, before failing to qualify for the 2018 and 2022 tournaments, culminating in their third consecutive absence in 2026.
This downward trajectory has prompted major Italian media outlets to use harsh descriptions, with local newspapers speaking of a ‘footballing disgrace’ and a ‘systemic collapse,’ arguing that the problem has transcended mere results and reached the very core of the country’s football structure.
The greatest paradox lies in the fact that this decline comes after Italy’s Euro 2020 triumph, which analytical reports have deemed a:
clear disconnect between momentary success and the absence of a long-term project.
Just when the Italian national team seemed poised to reclaim its continental glory, it encountered a different reality on the world stage, repeatedly failing to advance through the qualifiers and playoffs.
Structural flaws and a decline in talent
International reports suggest that the Italian crisis has deeper dimensions than just technical ones, pointing to a range of factors.
Most notably, there has been a decline in the country’s player development system and an increasing reliance on foreign players for Italian clubs, which has negatively impacted opportunities for developing local talent.
The reports also highlighted the lack of administrative and technical stability, along with the national team’s lack of leadership figures capable of handling the pressure in crucial matches – a deficiency clearly demonstrated by the successive failures during the qualifying rounds.
The recent elimination sparked widespread criticism within Italian sporting circles, with calls growing for a comprehensive review of the football system, from the national federation to the league structure and youth development programs.
In this context, reports quoted officials and former players confirming that “Italy is no longer just losing matches, but losing its footballing identity,” indicating the depth of the crisis the Azzurri are experiencing.
An uncertain future and open questions
Amid this situation, the Italian national team faces a real challenge to regain its historical standing, especially as it is one of the most decorated teams in World Cup history.
However, the repeated failures raise serious questions about Italy’s ability to break what has become known in the media as the “World Cup curse” and return to the global stage after years of absence and decline.
Featured image via the Associated Press
Politics
Lizzo Didn’t Have Sex Until After Her First Grammy Win In 2020
The Good As Hell singer is the latest guest on the Friends Keep Secrets podcast, where she disclosed that she was a “late bloomer” when it came to having sex for the first time.
Admitting that this was something she “lied about” for “a long time”, Lizzo eventually said that her first time was in 2020, when she was in her early 30s.
“Isn’t that crazy?” she remarked, admitting that sex was a subject she “wasn’t even thinking about” until that point.
The chart-topping star noted: “I promised myself when I was younger that I wouldn’t have sex until I won a Grammy.”
In January 2020, Lizzo picked up her first Grammy Awards in the Best Pop Solo Performance category for her hit Truth Hurts, Best Traditional R&B Performance for the album track Jerome and Best Urban Contemporary Album (now known as Best Progressive R&B Album) for her release Cuz I Love You.
She added during her podcast that while her first time “was not the night of the Grammys”, it was not too long afterwards.
Three years later, her signature song About Damn Time picked up Record Of The Year at the Grammys, one of the awards show’s top honours.
“I feel a weight off of my chest right now,” she said during her Friends Keep Secrets interview, recalling: “I was in a friend group of girls. We were all girling one night, and it was like, ‘Wait, Lizzo are you a virgin?’. I remember it was so embarrassing, I said, ‘I love the D’ – and it held me over for a little while.”
Lizzo also said that her first kiss was at the age of 21, after someone “forced it on me” at a New Year’s Eve celebration.
“It was religious for me too. Like, when we were teenagers at my church, we all made a pact that we wouldn’t do anything before marriage,” she claimed.
“And then, I was just so scared. Like, nobody wanted to kiss me.”
Last year, Lizzo released the mixtape My Face Hurts From Smiling, featuring guest appearances from SZA and Doja Cat, predominantly made up of rap performances.
She’s expected to release her third full-length album, titled Love In Real Life, later this year.
Politics
The Most Tooth-Friendly Way To Eat Easter Eggs
Easter is coming, and that means chocolate.
I’m eagerly anticipating unwrapping my stash of eggs. But according to the dentist and founder of Dimples, Dr Pippa Nicholls, some methods of eating them might affect our teeth worse than others.
“Naturally, many people assume it’s healthier to nibble a corner of an Easter egg or grab a handful of mini eggs throughout the day,” she said.
But if you want to look after your teeth, she advised an approach similar to Sweden’s lördagsgodis.
What is lördagsgodis?
The Swedish tradition literally translates to “Saturday sweets”.
It limits the consumption of sweets to Saturday, when kids (and, presumably, sweet-toothed adults) can go to town on their favourite sugary snacks. The only catch is that they steer clear of candy for the rest of the week.
Designed to limit tooth decay, it seems to have had some benefits. Though a typical Swedish family of four consumes about a kilo of sweets a week, Swedish children have better dental health, on average, than their European counterparts.
What’s that got to do with my Easter eggs?
“When it comes to your teeth, it’s actually much better to enjoy sweet treats in one sitting,” Dr Nicholls said.
It doesn’t have to be on Saturday, though, so long as you’re not constantly grazing on sweets throughout the day, which can damage your enamel.
Adopting the more Swedish approach “Gives your teeth time to recover, rather than constantly exposing them to sugar, and can even help prevent the cycle of grazing that often leads to eating more overall, particularly in children.”
The dentist added, “I always recommend [eating Easter eggs] at the end of a meal. Not only will it help crush the sweet treat craving, it also is when the saliva flow is increased and will be the most protective to your teeth.”
Any other rules?
Yes. You might think that brushing your teeth immediately after consuming chocolate is the best way to flush the sugar away, but Dr Nicholls said that could actually backfire.
“Try to wait around 30 minutes before brushing your teeth after eating chocolate or sugary treats. Brushing immediately can actually strip minerals from the enamel while the mouth remains acidic, so giving your teeth time to rebalance helps protect them,” she explained.
Lastly, “Choosing dark chocolate or treats made with less refined sugars, such as unrefined cane or coconut sugar, can help reduce the amount of refined sugar available for bacteria in the mouth to feed on. Dark chocolate is also often more satisfying due to its rich flavour, which can naturally help limit how much we eat.”
Politics
MPs’ pay set to rise, because they’ve been soooo good this year and also every year
Starting today, 1 April, MPs’ basic salary will rise to £98,599. For comparison, the average full-time worker in the UK made £39,039 a year, as of April 2025.
The pay bump marks a 5% increase in MPs’ basic wage. For comparison, average inflation stood at 3% as of January 2026.
Likewise, MPs’ salaries are expected to continue to rise to around the £110,000 by 2029, which marks the end of the current parliament. For comparison, even chancellor Rachel Reeves’ promise that people will be £1,000 better off by then is looking shaky at best.
However, the basic salary is only the beginning of the story. MPs also get an expenses allowance to cover absolute necessities like their second homes in London, their offices, and travel. Likewise, if an MP also sits on a committee or holds an additional role, they of course receive extra money.
Meanwhile, teachers in the UK are still buying classroom supplies out of their own pocket.
MPs pay rise has to be a joke
If all of this is setting your blood to boiling, please calm down. Don’t be like the the Taxpayers’ Alliance said, who rushed to state that people will be:
seething to see politicians receive an inflation-busting pay rise, all while they suffer a personal recession.
Likewise, take care not to follow the example of the group’s chair John O’Connell, who said that:
After years of broken promises, falling living standards and deteriorating public services, MPs are being rewarded for failure with a princely pay boost.
You see, it’s not like MPs are setting their own salaries or anything – that would be monstrously corrupt.
Instead, politicians’ wages are determined by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA). IPSA makes its decision based on a number of factors, including 3.5% cost-of-living increase, along with a 1.5% benchmarking adjustment.
The watchdog compares MPs’ salaries to other politicians in similar democracies, as well as senior figures in the public sector and the NHS. Public sector salaries are, in turn, set by review bodies and, ultimately, by MPs.
Fortunately, MPs’ salaries are not compared to lower-ranking public sector workers, as this would look less favorable. For example, most NHS staffers will receive a 3.3% pay rise this year. Similarly, Civil Service workers received pay awards of up to 3.25% on average for 2025/26.
‘The wider economic context’
The independent head of IPSA is Richard Lloyd. An interesting an unrelated fact about Richard Lloyd is that he worked as a special adviser to prime minister Gordon Brown.
Explaining his decision, Lloyd said:
The role of an MP has evolved. They are dealing with higher levels of complex casework, and abuse and intimidation towards MPs and their staff has been growing.
In reaching our decision for 2026-27 we have benchmarked MPs’ pay against other responsible, senior roles in civic society and similar worldwide democracies, as well as considering our own core principles and the wider economic context.
In future years we will continue to consider prevailing economic and fiscal conditions when confirming annual pay decisions taking into account the experience of people outside of parliament.
When more work has been added to my jobs for the same pay as before, managers have called it a ‘necessary adjustment’ and ‘good business sense’. It’s nice that this kind of good business doesn’t apply to MPs.
It’s also nice that, despite their increasing casework and full-time jobs as MPs, parliamentarians are still finding time to work other jobs like appearing on the news in exchange for hundreds of thousands of pounds. Some even work extra jobs like appearing in cameo videos saying hi to neo-Nazis.
Growing levels of abuse, often factually accurate
Likewise, it’s also completely true that MPs are facing ever increasing levels of abuse. I know this, because I’m one of the cunts writing the abuse, and I’m writing more and more of it by the day.
However, I’m calling snivelling toerags like Starmer ‘snivelling toerags’ because he sucks up to fascist dictators like Donald Trump. I call Kemi Badenoch a racist horror because she talks about slashing human rights so that she can attack migrants. And, of course, I call Farage a far-right neo-Nazi shill because of the video evidence that he is a far-right neo-Nazi shill.
If MPs would like to receive less abuse, many would benefit from considering whether this abuse is linked to their being contemptible scum.
Until that point, they can kindly go fuck themselves – I imagine it’s covered by expenses.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
When And Why Did April Fool’s Day Begin?
The first of April is a dreaded day for many journalists. Our inboxes become rammed with suspicious press releases and eyebrow-raising anecdotes (and yes, these have been published as fact by some outlets in the past).
It seems we’re not the holiday’s only haters. Slate called April Fools “universally either hated or ignored”; a YouGov poll found that about half of respondents found the day annoying.
But why did it start in the first place?
We’re not actually sure. But there are three leading theories:
1) The calendar theory
Some think April Fool’s Day dates to 1564 in France, when King Charles IX moved the official start of the year from Easter to January 1. Prior to this edict, most Christian countries’ calendar began from the movable date.
The date on which Easter falls is determined by the moon rather than preset schedules, but it usually falls in April. Those who clung to the old ways may have been called “April Fools”.
2) The fish theory
Another theory, also from France, suggests the tradition could come from the April 1 holiday of Poisson d’Avril (“April fish”). This centuries-old celebration now involves sticking a paper fish to people’s backs without them noticing and shouting “April fish” once they’ve been fooled.
A French poem dating to 1508 mentions an “April fish,” which might suggest that something similar to the trick has been happening for hundreds of years.
3) The King John theory
Then, there’s the English theory. A legend about King John says that when he tried to nab some of the land for Gotham in Nottinghamshire, the local residents came up with a plan to keep him out.
They played the “fool” when the king’s scouts came ahead of him to check the area out, pretending to do strange things like drowning fish to ensure the reports wouldn’t entice the King to stay.
But the event would have happened in the 13th century, while the first written reference to April fool’s day in the UK didn’t happen ’til 1686.
Politics
Clapham: how our weak society emboldened the mob
You couldn’t ask for a better state-of-the-nation snapshot than the one coming out of Clapham in south-west London right now. Those clips of young, dumbfounded cops trying and failing to stop a mob of masked TikTok twats from running riot is Britain summed up. The dystopic vision of families barricaded inside shops as entitled delinquents swarm the streets for sport speaks to our crisis of social order. To see what lunacies the corrosion of adult authority can unleash, look no further than Clapham.
For two nights now, feral youths have poured on to Clapham’s streets seemingly for nothing more than the fleeting thrill of causing annoyance to ordinary people. Their performative twattery is apparently part of an Easter holiday ‘link-up’ organised via TikTok. In their digital playpens, these bored juveniles plotted to assemble in public with that most anti-social of intentions: to vex people. In their black garb and daft masks, they menaced shoppers for larks. Marks & Spencer, Sainsbury’s and Boots were all forced to close, some allowing shoppers to stay inside until the irritants had dispersed.
There were serious incidents. Three girls were arrested on suspicion of assaulting an emergency worker. Mistreating public servants is proper lowlife behaviour. The same group were also arrested for shoplifting. In one video, smoke can be seen billowing from Clapham Common: the fires of asocial arrogance. The police lamented the ‘disorder’ and issued a dispersal order for the youths. But I won’t be the only one wondering if those clips of masked brats escaping the clutches of floundering officers tell a worrying story about the state in the 21st century.
This street explosion of gleeful spite feels simultaneously pathetic and sinister. It’s not the Brixton riots, when vast numbers of youths rose up in anger over social issues, in particular police brutality. This nonsense is far smaller, far dumber and far more likely to fizzle out quickly, possibly even by tonight. After all, they’ll need an evening to narcissistically search for vids of themselves on TikTok to give a big thumbs-up to. And yet it is a serious incident. We must not turn a blind eye to such a brazen display of contempt for social norms. It speaks to a simmering nihilism among sections of our youth, one likely emboldened by adult society’s wilful abandonment of its duty to discipline, reprimand and guide the next generation.
To me, the events in Clapham flow from the breakdown of adult authority. Everywhere now, discipline is frowned upon as a borderline fascistic pursuit. Parenting experts warn mums and dads not to scold their littl’uns. Schools long ago abandoned their core duty of admonishing bad behaviour, replacing the stern telling-off with a therapeutic hand on the shoulder. And out in the wild, in everyday society, you hardly ever see adults giving kids an earful. Teens yell and swear and play their tinny music, and few if any of their elders bark: ‘BEHAVE.’
Not to be an old fart about it, but it is worth noting how spectacularly different this is to the not-so-distant past. We were told off by strangers all the time. Daily we were told to pipe down, grow up, get out. Once an old duffer on a bus clocked our distinctive Roman Catholic school uniforms and ominously said: ‘You go to the convent on the hill?’ We shut up instantly, because bringing the school into disrepute had consequences, sometimes corporal ones. There was an infrastructure of discipline that extended from the home to the school to the world itself.
That’s gone now. It feels like adults have been decommissioned, subtly instructed by society that their wisdom and firmness are no longer wanted. This mad deactivation of yesteryear’s social custodians has let infantile antics flourish. Even petty crime is now pretty much permissible. Teens jump the barrier at Tube stations or nick crisps and chocolate and rarely face consequences. If they have got the message that they can do whatever they like, whose fault is that? A society that refuses to say ‘NO’, loudly and resolutely, has no right to be shocked when its members behave like entitled children, even after childhood. Whether it’s the boy in a skirt who thinks he has the right to waltz into the girls’ bathroom or the boy in a mask who shuts down Boots for a laugh, this is what happens when we fail to tell the young to get a fucking grip.
It has bizarrely become a ‘progressive’ virtue to be anti-discipline. So what if youths steal beer or don’t pay their Tube fare – it’s no biggie, say the hipster nihilists of the bourgeois left. Some of these leftists live in Clapham – who knows, maybe they’ll change their tune now that they’ve seen where such adult cowardice masquerading as liberal coolness can lead.
As Slavoj Žižek says, there is unquestionably a ‘growing decay of manners’, and it really matters. Such ‘everyday insecurity hurts the poor much more than the rich who live calmly in their gated communities’, Žižek says. Well, now one of London’s better-off boroughs has been targeted by the post-manners madness stoked by the faux-progressivism of the elites. Clapham confirms that when adults vacate the terrain of moral guidance, they normalise mob behaviour. We need to get a grip before we can tell the kids to.
Brendan O’Neill is spiked’s chief political writer and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show. Subscribe to the podcast here. His latest book – After the Pogrom: 7 October, Israel and the Crisis of Civilisation – is available to order on Amazon UK and Amazon US now. And find Brendan on Instagram: @burntoakboy.
-
News Videos7 days agoParliament publishes latest register of MPs’ financial interests
-
Business6 days agoInstagram, YouTube Found Responsible for Teen’s Mental Health Struggle in Historic Ruling
-
Tech6 days agoIntercom’s new post-trained Fin Apex 1.0 beats GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 at customer service resolutions
-
NewsBeat5 days agoThe Story hosts event on Durham’s historic registers
-
Sports5 days agoSweet Sixteen Game Thread: Tide vs Michigan
-
Entertainment2 days ago
Fans slam 'heartbreaking' Barbie Dream Fest convention debacle with 'cardboard cutout' experience
-
Entertainment4 days agoLana Del Rey Celebrates Her Husband’s 51st Birthday In New Post
-
Crypto World1 day ago
Dems press CFTC, ethics board on prediction-market insider trades
-
Sports24 hours agoTallest college basketball player ever, standing at 7-foot-9, entering transfer portal
-
Tech3 days agoThe Pixel 10a doesn’t have a camera bump, and it’s great
-
Entertainment7 days agoHBO’s Harry Potter Series Will Definitely Fail For One Big Reason, And It’s Not J.K. Rowling Or Snape
-
Crypto World2 days agoU.S. rule change may open trillions in 401(k) funds to crypto
-
Fashion6 days agoEn Vogue in Brown Leather and Tailored Neutrals by Atelier Savoir, Styled by J Bolin
-
Tech1 day agoHow to back up your iPhone & iPad to your Mac before something goes wrong
-
Fashion6 days agoWhat Are Your Favorite T-Shirts for the Weekend?
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekly News Update, 3.27.26 – Corporette.com
-
Politics2 days agoShould Trump Be Scared Strait?
-
Tech1 day agoEE TV is using AI to help you find something to watch
-
Fashion3 days agoAmazon Sundays: Soft Spring Layers
-
Tech3 days agoElon Musk’s last co-founder reportedly leaves xAI





























You must be logged in to post a comment Login