Connect with us

Politics

The House Opinion Article | We can’t have assisted dying in a care crisis

Published

on

We can't have assisted dying in a care crisis
We can't have assisted dying in a care crisis


4 min read

It is welcome news that Andy Burnham has made it clear that assisted suicide should not be introduced while the situation with social and palliative care in this country is so dire.

Advertisement

Hospice and palliative care face a severe funding problem. A National Audit Office report published at the end of last year found that nearly two-thirds of England’s independent hospices ran a financial deficit in 2023/24, with expenditures exceeding income by £78m. The hospice care provider, Marie Curie, revealed this year that around 170,000 people die annually in England with unaddressed symptoms, and unmet palliative care needs are expected to rise by 23 per cent in the next 25 years unless drastic measures are taken to fix the deficiencies.

Such a context is not one in which assisted suicide should be legalised. Individuals with unmet palliative care needs would not be given genuine choice at the end of their lives. Sufficient treatment would often not be an option, but a hastened death would be. Indeed, as health secretary, Wes Streeting warned that funding for palliative and end-of-life care would have to be reduced so funding could be diverted to set up assisted suicide services.

Lauren Edwards, the MP sponsoring the latest iteration of the assisted suicide bill, responded to the Prime Minister’s statement by making the claim that you don’t have to choose between fixing palliative care or having assisted suicide – it would be possible to have both. This has become a common refrain from supporters, but there cannot be a genuine choice if funding for care is so inadequate that some terminally ill people may feel forced into a premature death because their basic needs are not being met. The argument just doesn’t hold water.

Advertisement

Not only would there likely be less funding to fix palliative care if assisted suicide were to be introduced, which would bring its own costs, but the reforms needed to solve the deeply entrenched funding problems in the care sector are not a quick fix; they will take time.

The assisted suicide legislation includes an implementation period of a maximum of four years that would begin immediately after receiving Royal Assent and becoming law. This would mean that, after four years, assisted suicide would automatically be introduced regardless of the state of palliative care services at that time. I have every hope that the PM achieves his goal of fixing the funding issues in the care sector, but setting a hard limit of only a few years – less than the lifespan of one parliament – to fully address this monumental problem would be an irresponsible hostage to fortune.

Experts also agree that it is simply not feasible to attempt to do both at the same time. Professor Katherine Sleeman, Chair in Palliative Care at King’s College, London, has said that introducing assisted suicide when care services are so fragmented presents a “huge risk” that people may decide to end their lives “simply because of lack of high-quality care”. Professor Mumtaz Patel, President of the Royal College of Physicians, said something similar to the House of Lords Select Committee that considered the last assisted suicide bill: that people would certainly choose to end their lives “because of the lack of provision around good palliative care”. That, surely, is not what anyone wants.

Fixing palliative care is of enduring national importance, and it is welcome that the PM, along with both supporters and opponents of the assisted suicide legislation, recognises it as such. MPs must unite to implement the reforms needed to address these funding issues.

Advertisement

And yet, it seems irrefutable to me that care services cannot be fixed concurrently with the legalisation of assisted suicide, and that assisted suicide could not be introduced safely. Care services remain in a poor state. The obvious solution, as the PM has recognised, is to defer any talk of assisted suicide until we have fixed the issues with palliative care. Anything else would be irresponsible.

 

Mary Glindon is Labour MP for Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

James Cleverly Slams Suella Braverman’s Immigration Legacy

Published

on

James Cleverly Slams Suella Braverman's Immigration Legacy

Suella Braverman was hit with a timely reminder of her legacy on X by her former colleague James Cleverly in a spat about asylum seekers.

Previously a home secretary under Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss, Braverman crossed the floor to join Nigel Farage’s party back in January.

However, in her new role as Reform’s education spokesperson, she seems to have forgotten exactly what she did in government.

The argument began when Reform leader Nigel Farage shared footage from within Cleverly’s constituency of Braintree showing groups of asylum seekers sitting on the street.

Advertisement

His caption read: “Just another day in James Cleverly’s constituency. Unless we get a Reform government, every town in Britain will look like this.”

Cleverly replied: “Wait until Nigel finds out that these people are in Braintree because Suella Braverman and Rob Jenrick opened an asylum accommodation centre in my constituency.

“Where are Rob and Suella now?”

Robert Jenrick, former Tory immigration minister under Braverman, is now Reform’s Treasury spokesperson.

Advertisement

Braverman hit back at Cleverly: “You were home secretary after me. If you were so opposed to Wethersfield, you could have shut it down. Why didn’t you do that?”

That post was hit with a community note from other X users stating that Cleverly recused himself from all decisions on that asylum accommodation centre as “per the ministerial code as the local MP”.

Cleverly also replied: “Have you never read the Ministerial Code?

“Are you not aware that ministers have to recuse themselves from decisions that would directly benefit themselves or their constituencies? Also I spent most of my time as Home Secretary clearing up the mess you left.”

Advertisement

The MP for Fareham and Waterlooville hit back by deflecting: “You should be apologising to the country for being one of those Tories who objected to leaving the ECHR- which is why the last Tory government failed to stop the boats.

“You should be apologising to the country for refusing the ban the IRGC – the source of extremism and terrorism in the UK.

“You should be apologising to the country for opening talks with Mauritius on Chagos. The country is still clearing up the mess you left.”

Their furious exchange comes amid a trying time for Reform UK.

Advertisement

Leader Farage triggered a by-election in his constituency of Clacton amid heightened scrutiny over a £5 million donation from a crypto billionaire which he failed to declare to parliament.

He was re-elected earlier this month, meaning the parliamentary sleaze probe into the gift has resumed.

Reform also surprisingly suspended prominent party member Tim Montgomerie last week after his frequent criticism of Reform’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf and of Farage.

The right-wing party has also lost its dominant lead in the polls since Andy Burnham replaced Keir Starmer in No.10.

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Meghan Markle And Netflix’s The Gentlemen: What’s The Actual Story?

Published

on

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pictured in Australia earlier this year

For the past few days, the entertainment world has been abuzz with conflicting reports about Meghan Markle making an acting comeback in the unlikeliest of places.

Word on the street has been that the Duchess of Sussex had been eyed for a role in Guy Ritchie’s The Gentlemen.

First, she was in, then she was out, then she was never “in” in the first place – with the whole thing being made even more complicated by the fact that none of the parties involved had actually spoken out to confirm or deny the bizarre story.

So, for those who’ve not been following, or just need a recap, here’s a quick reminder of everything that’s been said so far – and, notably, who’s been saying it. Just keep in mind, none of this has actually been confirmed to true (so far!)…

Advertisement

Thursday 20 August: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reported to be moving back to the UK

It’s now been over six years since Prince Harry shocked the world by announcing that he and his wife Meghan would be stepping down from their roles as senior royals, and eventually moving overseas.

The rest has been well-documented, but after a Netflix documentary, a tell-all book and numerous revealing interviews, it’s fair to say that relations between the Sussexes and the rest of the Royal Family haven’t always looked the rosiest.

So, it came as another bolt from the blue last week when People magazine reported that the couple were planning to move back to the UK alongside their two children, seven-year-old Archie and five-year-old Lilibet.

Advertisement
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pictured in Australia earlier this year
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pictured in Australia earlier this year

People’s report claimed that two would “establish a private, non-royal home base in Britain” while keeping their production company Archewell overseas, and maintaining properties in the USA (Montecito, California, to be more specific) and Portugal.

It was also suggested that the wheels were already in motion, with Harry and Meghan having already enrolled their children in a school, where they’d begin classes when term begins in just over a week’s time.

Friday 21 August: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s move is reported to be based on the fact that the Duchess of Sussex has been ‘offered a role in an upcoming project based in the UK’

This is when things began veering into “hold onto your hats, folks” territory.

While the motivations behind the Sussexes’ move were not disclosed, Australia’s news.com.au was the first to allege that the couple’s decision was based on the fact that Meghan had been “offered a role in an upcoming project based in the UK”, according to their undisclosed “entertainment sources”.

Advertisement

BBC News even picked up on the story, after which the showbiz outlet Variety claimed to have had it “confirmed”.

The journalist who broke the story, Bronte Coy, later told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that the role was “significant”, and that the Duchess of Sussex was “very excited about it”.

Meghan last acted in Suits, the TV show where she made her name internationally, before stepping down from the series in 2018 ahead of her marriage to Prince Harry.

Meghan Markle on the set of Suits in 2017
Meghan Markle on the set of Suits in 2017

USA Network/Netflix/Kobal/Shutterstock

Since then, she has had a number of on-screen roles, though not in an acting capacity, perhaps most notably her ill-fated Netflix lifestyle series With Love, Meghan and a guest judging stint on the Australian version of MasterChef.

Advertisement

Later this year, she’ll also make a cameo appearance as herself in the comedy Close Personal Friends, starring Oscar winner Brie Larson, Emily In ParisLily Collins and Crazy Rich AsiansHenry Golding.

Friday 21 August: Meghan Markle is reported to be ‘in talks’ for a role in The Gentlemen

Once whisperings about a return to the acting world for Meghan and a mysterious role she’d been offered, Deadline alleged within hours that she was being “eyed” for a role in a future season of Guy Ritchie’s hit gangster series The Gentlemen.

They cited unnamed “sources” who’d told them she was in the “early stages” to play a role in a potential third season, with a specific part having supposedly not yet “been identified”.

Advertisement

The Gentlemen is a spin-off of Guy’s film of the same name, and proved to be a huge hit with both critics and viewers when it premiered on Netflix in 2024, with a second run due to debut next week.

The cast of Netflix's The Gentlemen in a season one promo image
The cast of Netflix’s The Gentlemen in a season one promo image

In the next run of episodes, series regulars Theo James and Kaya Scodelario will be joined by some new additions, most notably Love Island host Maya Jama.

Crucially, Deadline pointed out that the rumoured talks between Meghan and The Gentlemen were “hypothetical” because the show hasn’t even been commissioned for a third season yet.

They also alleged that reps for both the Sussexes and Netflix had “declined to comment”.

Meanwhile, The Hollywood Reporter had its own version of the story that same morning, suggesting these early talks were actually in the “advanced discussions” stage, and that Meghan’s role was “being written” after she and Guy met “through mutual acquaintances”.

Advertisement

Saturday 22 August: Veteran journalist Tina Brown claims Meghan Markle’s ‘offer’ to appear in The Gentlemen has been ‘withdrawn’

Naturally, news of Meghan potentially appearing in a show like The Gentlemen raised eyebrows, with former Tatler and Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown – who penned the explosive royal book The Palace Papers in 2022 – claiming the following morning that the talks had abruptly ended.

“I learned this morning that the casting of Meghan Markle in season three of Guy Ritchie’s Netflix series The Gentlemen has been withdrawn,” she wrote on Substack. “The backlash in the UK was so intense, it became untenable to go forward. This does not bode well for Meghan’s acting comeback in the UK.”

She also teased “more to come”, but has not posted since Saturday morning.

Advertisement

Crucially, it’s worth remembering that Meghan’s “casting” in season three hadn’t even been established to be “withdrawn”, with the initial report claiming she’d only entered preliminary talks with show bosses, rather than receiving any kind of formal offer.

Sunday 23 August: A journalist supposedly in the know contests the whole story

A day later, Complex quoted a journalist supposedly in the know, who’d posted on X that Meghan’s casting in The Gentlemen wasn’t “off” because “it was never on”.

He wrote that he knew Guy Ritchie, and that the original story was a “total fabrication” and “ridiculous”.

Advertisement
Meghan Markle pictured in October 2025
Meghan Markle pictured in October 2025

So, what exactly have Meghan Markle, Netflix and Guy Ritchie said about the rumours?

Well, that’s the exactly it – none of them have commented publicly, although HuffPost UK has contacted reps for the Duchess of Sussex, Netflix and Guy Ritchie for comment.

The second season of The Gentlemen, meanwhile, will begin streaming on Thursday 3 September…

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

German extremist-right AfD plans segregated education for disabled and refugee children

Published

on

AfD

AfD

Germany’s ‘Alternative für Deutschland‘ (AfD) is classified as an extremist right-wing organisation even by German security services. And the party is determined to be its true racist, eugenicist self. AfD has announced that if it takes power in the approaching Saxony-Anhalt regional elections, it will segregate refugee children into a separate education system. So far, so unsurprisingly evil. But the party also wants to take Germany back to its nazi roots by segregating disabled children as well.

And for good measure, AfD plans to reduce education on the nazi era and politics.

AfD: “the inclusion experiment has failed”

The racist party’s manifesto announced that it finished with integrated education: the “inclusion experiment has failed and and must be ended”. AfD claims that it wants to pull disabled children out of mainstream education for their benefit. It says that it will segregate refugee children to send a “message that their stay in Germany is only temporary” – while it works to shut down the arrival of refugees Germany’s own policies help to create. And even in the refugee schools, Islamic education will be excluded because “Islam is not part of Germany” – making clear just who the AfD’s scapegoat is.

But let’s be clear: this is all about preventing impressionable young people being exposed to, and learning to empathise with, children who are different from them. Nazi ‘othering’ – and the murderous ‘useless eater’ mentality that goes with it – depend on indoctrinating the young to hate those who are not like them.

Advertisement

Keeping German children from being able to empathise and identify with fellow human beings the state – or a political party wanting to control the state – rejects and scapegoats. In the country that gave birth to Nazism and the slaughter of Jews, disabled people, LGBTQ people and people of ‘impure’ or ‘subhuman’ ethnicity, what could possibly go wrong?

Saxony’s education minister Conrad Clemens told Bild that:

The idea of putting foreigners and students with disabilities in separate classes leads to a dangerous division in the classroom. Such ideas are unacceptable for our education system.

Polling projects a strong performance for AfD in the 6 September 2026 Saxony-Anhalt elections.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

I Tried The Viral ‘Banana Nuggets’: Recipe And Review

Published

on

Cooking banana bites

In case you haven’t noticed, I like a sweet breakfast (though so-called “frambled” eggs make an acceptable alternative from time to time). If I could, I’d eat dessert every morning.

Which is why I was very, very excited to see banana fritters-eque fried flapjack bites all over my TikTok and Instagram pages.

So, I thought I’d give the ridiculously easy recipe, dubbed “banana nuggets” by food creator Tom Fauconnet, a go.

The super-simple ‘banana nuggets’ recipe takes minutes to make

Advertisement

The posts I saw described banana nuggets as a very simple, minimum-three-ingredient recipe: chop up a banana and add it to a pan with oats and some Golden Syrup, maple syrup or honey.

Some recipes call for butter, and others don’t. But come on: I’m not skipping my beloved Kerrygold here.

I ended up using the following amounts of each:

  • 1 banana
  • 25g oats
  • 10g butter
  • 1 tablespoon Golden Syrup

As the heat warms the butter and sugar into a caramel, the oats bind to the banana slices, a little like a flapjack (shaking the pan helps to coat the sections without breaking them apart). And the longer they’re left in the pan, the more crispy and golden that buttery outer layer gets.

Like porridge, the exact measurements aren’t strict. You can mostly eyeball it: add more golden syrup and butter if the oats aren’t sticking, and more oats if your banana is looking conspicuously bald.

Advertisement

I’ll be honest, I wish I’d put more butter in mine. But I was almost out, and the recipe is forgiving – the oats still clung.

Cooking banana bites

Spices like cinnamon are great here, too: I just sprinkled some over the oats in the pan.

I was really impressed by how quickly the mixture came together. For the first minute, it feels like you’ve horribly mismeasured – after that, though, the mix clumps together beautifully. Predictably, given this is basically caramel with toasted oats (which you should use in porridge, too), the smell is divine.

But to get the beginnings of a tan on the outer layer of my bites, I had to leave them in the pan for about seven minutes all-in. (I probably should have been more patient: 10 minutes would have been golden perfection).

Banana fried flapjacks

The fun really starts once your “banana nuggets” have finished cooking. Many place them on a bed of Greek yoghurt before adding fruit, chocolate chips, nuts and sweet sauces.

Sadly (can you tell I tried this recipe before The Big Shop?), I didn’t have many of those options to play with. Instead, I had to try it with a single square of M&S’ (very good) dark cooking chocolate, which I suppose had the unintended upside of giving me a less tainted banana nugget experience.

Advertisement
Banana nuggets

So… what’s the verdict?

Even without the extra toppings, and despite the fact that I undercooked them, these banana nuggets were delicious.

Their crispy, buttery (ignore butter-free recipes!) outer layer was crispy and nutty, giving way to soft, sweet banana.

It’s not quite as intense a contrast as deep-fried banana fritters, but it’s got its own flapjack-like appeal.

I really wish I’d had tart fruits, like raspberries, to eat this with, and Greek yoghurt should be considered an almost mandatory part of this dish. It needs something soft, creamy, and slightly tangy.

Advertisement

But even with those caveats, “banana nuggets”, which take minutes, taste amazing, and make your whole kitchen smell divine, have already transformed my breakfasts.

Just make sure to be more patient with the cook time than I was – and don’t skimp on the toppings.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Lord Banner KC and Jack Airey: Why Conservatives should back Labour’s planning reforms

Published

on

Charles, Lord Banner is a practising planning KC as well as a working peer, and Jack Airey is Director of Housing and Infrastructure at Public First having previously been a planning advisor in No 10.

One of the most consequential planning reforms of the past few decades was a Conservative achievement.

In 2012 a Conservative-led government took more than a thousand pages of planning policy and cut them down to barely fifty, with a presumption in favour of sustainable development at its heart. That turbocharged the granting of permissions. Housebuilding climbed to just under 250,000 homes a year before the pandemic, and has steadily declined since.

The new National Planning Policy Framework, brought forward under Labour, continues that work, and it is a strong document. It opens up brownfield land across the country. It takes a sensible view of green belt allowing its less important parts to be considered for development.

Advertisement

Reforms like these take time to bite, but they will eventually support more private enterprise, more homes and more families able to buy, some of the values the Conservative Party exists to defend.

The framework is the bedrock for a large increase in housebuilding next parliament, provided the jobs and wage growth are there to give people the means to buy. Labour will not hit its target of 1.5 million homes. Overzealous tax and regulation have made building unprofitable in too many places, and a stagnant economy means the demand is not yet there.

Yet a big rise in delivery is desperately needed. The average home in England now costs 7.6 times average earnings.

At the turn of the century it was about four.

Advertisement

The planning system now in place could underwrite that rise early next decade, and it may well be a Conservative government that presides over it. Any temptation to commit to scrap the reforms should therefore be resisted.

Opposition of course still has its place. The NPPF can be improved, and the wider system is far too slow. It does too little for the small and medium builders who cannot get a scheme off the ground because the sums do not work, and it burdens some sites with so many requirements that they cannot actually be built. Ministers should also be pressed on Sadiq Khan’s London Plan, which as drafted will do next to nothing for the capital’s housing crisis. All of that can be argued for while still backing the core of the reforms.

It is worth learning from the experience of New Zealand. Facing a housing shortage as bad as ours, Labour and the National Party worked together to deliver major planning reforms, having decided the problem was too serious for the usual point-scoring.

The reforms led to more housebuilding and housing becoming more affordable.

Advertisement

The Conservatives can stand with the millions who want a home of their own, and the many whose livelihoods depend on building them, while still speaking for local people who want development done right. Held together, those are the makings of a winning coalition. A party founded on ownership and enterprise should build it.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Susan Boyle Reacts To All Those Ted Lasso Shout-Outs

Published

on

Susan Boyle Reacts To All Those Ted Lasso Shout-Outs

But what we weren’t expecting was that this recent Su-naissance would extend to the Ted Lasso universe.

Since it premiered at the beginning of this month, the former Britain’s Got Talent star has been the name on everyone’s lips in Ted Lasso’s fourth season.

Over the weekend, Susan shared a video of herself watching the latest of Ted Lasso on Instagram, showing Jason Sudeiki’s character admitting he’d finally got round to watching “this Susan Boyle audition”.

“She’s the most talented woman on earth,” he declared, prompting a response from the woman herself.

Advertisement

“Cheers Ted!” Susan enthused, before taking a sip from a dedicated “Ted” mug to reveal the feeling was very much mutual.

“I’m back alright,” she enthused at the time. “I’m feeling OK, and ready to go.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Russia Claims Burnham Is Adding ‘Fuel To The Fire’ Of Ukraine War

Published

on

Russia Claims Burnham Is Adding 'Fuel To The Fire' Of Ukraine War

Russia has hit out at Andy Burnham over his decision to share long-range missile blueprints with Ukraine.

The UK prime minister travelled to Ukraine on Monday – his first international trip since getting the keys to No.10 – and is expected to hand Kyiv key information on how to build the advanced rockets.

While marking 35 years since Ukraine first secured independence from the former USSR, Burnham will confirm that a key defence firm can release classified information on British components for the long-range missile SCALP.

It comes after the Kremlin already warned Britain of the “consequences” after it was confirmed that British drones had been used as part of Ukrainian attacks hitting targets deep within Russia.

Advertisement

Burnham brushed off the warnings, insisting that Britain is not a “fair-weather friend” to Ukraine.

Today, he said: “The Ukrainian people should be in no doubt: the UK is behind you today and for as long as it takes.

“I am proud of the contribution our country has made to Ukraine, and I want the Ukrainian people to hear it directly from me that our support will not waver. After all, Ukraine’s security is our security.”

The Kremlin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov was furious over the developments, telling Sky News: “[We view them] extremely negative.

Advertisement

“Britain is participating in this war on the side of the Kyiv regime.

“Britain is methodically and consistently adding fuel to the fire and methodically and consistently plotting to prevent a peaceful settlement process.”

“Who started the fire? That’s the question, isn’t it,” Burnham later replied when speaking to reporters in Kyiv on Monday.

The Russian embassy in London also criticised reports from the weekend which pointed out that it had not yet appointed a Russian ambassador to the UK.

Advertisement

Andrei Kelin left the post abruptly on July 21 after seven years in the top diplomatic post.

Embassy staff told The Times that they were not sure when he would be replaced, and the Foreign Office is yet to receive a list of potential candidates for the top job.

But writing on Telegram on Monday, the embassy disputed the article.

It said: “The embassy considers it necessary to note that nothing in its comment provided to the newspaper implies that the Russian side intends to downgrade the level of diplomatic relations between our two countries.

Advertisement

“Such conclusions belong solely to the author of the publication and are based on suggestions by his unnamed sources.”

The embassy notably added: “As for the state of Russia-UK relations across all areas, they have deteriorated to an unprecedentedly low level entirely on London’s initiative.”

The UK’s relationship with Russia cooled considerably after Vladimir Putin launched his illegal invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

But the Russian autocrat continues to wage war against his European neighbours in a brutal land grab.

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Dua Lipa Lifts The Lid On ‘Beautiful’ Wedding To Callum Turner

Published

on

Dua Lipa Lifts The Lid On 'Beautiful' Wedding To Callum Turner

Dua Lipa is opening up about her wedding day.

Earlier in the summer, the Training Season singer married British actor Callum Turner at an intimate ceremony in London, before jetting off to Palermo for a more lavish celebration.

Speaking to Vogue Italia, Dua recalled that hers and Callum’s reception was “such a beautiful celebration”.

The Grammy winner also opened up about how friends of hers and Callum’s had given them “lots of advice” about how best to maximise, but there were “two suggestions that we really took on board”.

Advertisement

“One was to show up at our wedding like we were guests ourselves, which meant we had the best time and we weren’t stressed at all,” she said.

“The other was for Callum and me to keep checking in with each other so we didn’t lose each other in the crowd. As a result, we spent loads of time together and created so many amazing memories.”

Elsewhere in the interview, she spoke about how her attitude to romance has changed over the years – and how this has affected her songwriting.

“[Writing] about having a broken heart is very common,” she explained. “When I was younger, I found much more inspiration in the search for and the longing for [true love] because heartbreak is such a loud emotion.

Advertisement

“But now I want to discover what happens after you find love. I’m interested in the everyday complexities of a relationship, in its quieter moments, in the small things.”

Dua and Callum began dating in January 2024, making their red carpet debut as a couple at the following year’s Met Gala, around a month before confirming their engagement.

Shortly afterwards, she told British Vogue that the engagement was “very exciting”, revealing how Callum had designed her engagement ring for her, and that she was “obsessed” with it.

“It’s nice to know the person that you’re going to spend the rest of your life with knows you very well,” she enthused.

Advertisement

Read Dua Lipa’s latest interview in full in Vogue Italia.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Israel issues kill-order for Palestinian children flying kites

Published

on

Israel Gaza kites

Israel Gaza kites

Israel’s occupation regime has issued an order to kill Palestinian children if they dare to fly kites in Gaza.

The order comes after a manufactured panic following four kites that broke loose over several days and landed in Israeli neighbourhoods close to Gaza. The occupation military admitted the kites posed no threat at all, but this has not stopped ‘defence’ minister Israel Katz from announcing that anyone flying kites will be targeted for ‘forceful‘ military action. Katz also threatened to escalate Israel’s wider assassination campaign and forced displacements across Gaza if the kites continue to fly:

A balloon is like a kite, and a kite is like a drone, whether it carries explosives or not.

Respite denied by Israel

Kite-flying is one of the few recreations that have been within reach for Palestinian children to provide a few moments respite from the horrors of Israel’s genocide. Now it is likely, like so many other things in Gaza, to get them killed by the coloniser.

Zionists’ targeting of children has been identified by the United Nations and others as a core part of its Gaza genocide.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

7 Plants UK Gardeners Won’t Be Growing Again In 2027

Published

on

7 Plants UK Gardeners Won't Be Growing Again In 2027

What a year 2026 has been. We’ve had heatwave after blistering heatwave, leading to drought in parts of the UK – and resulting hosepipe bans are expected to last until the end of the year, according to a Thames Water boss.

That’s spelled chaos for gardeners.

The Royal Horticultural Society found that while some species, like wild carrots and lavender, thrived in the parched conditions, others like hydrangeas suffered enormously.

And a peek at Reddit’s r/GardeningUK proves that ordinary growers are starting to reconsider what they plant, too.

Advertisement

Writing to the group, site user u/oldschoolie asked their fellow green-fingered forum members: “What will you be giving up on because it died or needed too much coddling in the drought this year?”

Here are some of the most-upvoted responses:

1) “Anything that died in the drought! If it survived, it can stay”

Credit: u/Normal-Height-8577

Advertisement

BTW, the Royal Horticultural Society offers similar advice. Its principal horticultural advisor, Leigh Hunt, said: “As temperatures become more extreme don’t replace like for like – if a plant is struggling in your garden you can plant something better suited to the space.”

2) “Hydrangeas”

“I’ve been nursing a bunch of them for the last four years… and tried many spots, but every summer [they] become pretty sorry looking. [They] take too much effort to get back to [a good condition] before they get ‘summered’ again.”

Credit: u/Glittering-Mentat-4

Advertisement

Hydrangeas seem to be among the most susceptible plants in a heatwave.

3) “Lupins”

“Urgh. Even with the drought, they still got slug-decimated, and have just sat there looking crap and scraggly since.”

Redditor u/A_Pure_Motive agreed, writing: “Same here, looked fabulous for about a month, if that, and have looked awful since the hot weather hit and also been subject to multiple aphid attacks. Saved all the seeds, hoping to plant more for next year, and now I’m thinking meh…”

Advertisement

4) “50% of the lawn”

“I want some grass, but the rest will be pollinator-friendly plants which don’t need much water.”

Wildflowers, clover, and thyme can “reduce or eliminate the need for watering and improve biodiversity,” explained the RHS. Gardens that follow a mixed grass and wildflower pattern are sometimes called tapestry lawns.

5) “Pots and planters. All of them”

Advertisement

We’ve written before at HuffPost UK about how important it is to place potted plants in dark, shady spots when it’s hot out. Their thinner soil dries out much faster than soil in the ground – this is especially true for dark plastic and unsealed terracotta pots.

In general, container plants suffer more in the heat.

6) “Courgettes”

“They always end up with powdery mildew and look awful. Output has been dwindling in recent years, especially bad this year.”

Advertisement

And u/destria seemed to have a similar experience, writing: “It’s been my worst year for courgettes too. Such a low yield. I’m usually drowning in them, but this year, even with five plants, we’ve only been getting maybe three to four decent courgettes each week. I don’t even like courgettes that much…”

7) “Sweet peas”

“They’ve done very poor[ly] the last two years,” u/insrtitherenow, who‘s also given up on celery, said.

For their part, u/Panda1953 reckoned, “Neither sweet peas [nor] tomatoes have been a success this summer. Won’t bother next summer.”

Advertisement

If you’re looking to overhaul your back garden ahead of what seem to be very likely future heatwaves, we’ve written a handy guide on where to start.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025