Politics
UAE: Petro-dictatorships stand by America
The US and Israel have launched an illegal war of aggression against oil-rich Iran. As a result, petro-dictatorships across the Arabian Gulf, including the UAE, which hosts US military facilities, have become a target for Iranian retaliation.
With foreign billionaires fleeing the tax haven of Dubai, the UAE is clearly upset about US-Israeli terror painting a target on its back but unwilling to atone for its imperialist sins.
UAE’s betrayal of Arab states
The UAE is a playground for air warfare training. The tiny emirate hosts the US 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, made up of 10 aircraft squadrons who operate MQ-9 Reapers drones.
Emirati misadventures in Sudan haven’t gone unnoticed either, with it backing genocidal actors and in doing so fuelling Sudan’s genocide – as the UN recently conceded. Since Iran began retaliating, the authoritarian state is apparently trying to distance itself from the US-Israeli operation which has already killed 555 people in Iran, including “about 180 young children,” and emphasising its:
categorical rejection of the use of the territories of regional states as arenas for settling disputes or expanding the scope of the conflict.
UAE Condemns in Strongest Terms Iran’s Blatant Missile Attacks Targeting the Country and Brotherly Nationshttps://t.co/hqiwhZijBM pic.twitter.com/wOS2BKkkro
— MoFA وزارة الخارجية (@mofauae) February 28, 2026
Reading between the lines, the UAE has made its refusal to enter a regionalised conflict clear – selfishly prioritising its economic interests over regional collectivity and solidarity with its Arab neighbours.
This isn’t just a message to Iran, author Shanaka Anslem Perera has insisted. Perera argues that:
The question the UAE is now asking itself, and that every Gulf capital is asking alongside it, is whether the grand bargain still holds. Whether hosting American bases provides net security or net risk. Whether the umbrella protects you or paints a target on you…
Dubai did not build itself into the crossroads of global commerce by taking sides. It built itself by being the place where all sides could do business. That positioning is now incompatible with hosting the infrastructure of someone else’s war.
Iran has insisted that it sees all US assets in Western Asia as legitimate military targets for retaliation, and will:
continue to exercise its right of self-defence decisively and without hesitation until the aggression ceases fully and unequivocally.
The UAE ministry of defence, cited by Gulf news, confirmed the death of three civilians as a result of Iran’s counter strikes which have placed the country on red alert.
It’s about oil, but also Israeli colonialism
Iran holds massive oil reserves and is surrounded by a terrain littered with least 19 US military facilities. As the USA’s Energy Information Administration has explained, Iran has:
some of the world’s largest deposits of proven oil and natural gas reserves, ranking as the world’s third-largest oil and second-largest natural gas reserve holder in 2023
The problem is that Iranian people got sick of foreign meddling as far back as 1979, when they toppled the Western-endorsed Pahlavi dynasty. This resulted in the exit of Western oil companies. And while an ultra-conservative theocratic regime eventually took control in Iran, it wasn’t the kind that would submit to Western interests in the region – especially Israel.
Through either punishments or rewards, the US empire has sought to ensure submission in Western Asia, which is “home to almost half the world’s oil reserves“.
In exchange for Western backing and protection, authoritarian states in the Gulf like the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait have long hosted US military facilities. Iran, meanwhile, has consistently been slapped with crippling sanctions and – amid the ongoing US-Israeli decimation of international law – military attacks too.
Considering the US’s recent illegal actions to control Venezuela’s oil exports, it’s impossible to argue that oil is not a factor in its latest assault on Iran.
Neither controlling Iran’s oil nor overthrowing Iran’s clerical class seem like realistic prospects.
A risky US gamble in service of Israel
For decades, Israel has demonised Iran and yearned to topple its leadership. And with the US enabling Israel’s genocide in Gaza since 2023, it has felt untouchable enough to push for regime change in Iran. But experts agree that the aimless war is unlikely to succeed in that endeavour, and, if it does, it will unleash more chaos and conflict.
If the US and Israel do keep pushing for full regime change, Gulf dictatorships will find themselves in an impossible bind. I
f they continue to stand by idly in the face of US-Israeli terror, they will:
As Al Jazeera asserts:
The Gulf states did not want this confrontation.
Oman had been mediating talks and Iran had shown it was prepared to make a number of concessions. It is the only Gulf state that doesn’t host US military assets and materiel. But war criminals Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu chose terror instead, in a region considered to be one of the world’s most critical geopolitical energy hub.
Iran may not be able to hit the US itself. But through these counter-strikes, it could shut down US-backed Gulf regimes with “strikes on power grids, water desalination plants and energy infrastructure,” according to Middle East politics professor Monica Marks. With this in mind, these states will do their best to stay out of the conflict as much as possible.
Petro-dictators might not be kicking US bases out of the region any time soon. But US-Israeli recklessness and lawlessness in the region won’t exactly be convincing them that these facilities are worth having, either.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
The House | Families In Greatest Need Of Social Housing Wait Years In Some Areas, Data Reveals

Illustration by Tracy Worrall
8 min read
A data investigation by The House has revealed that those with the greatest needs are being forced to wait years for social housing, leaving families in a miserable limbo. Chaminda Jayanetti reports
People with the greatest housing needs are waiting months or even years in the highest priority bands of councils’ social housing registers in many parts of England, according to data compiled by The House.
In some local authorities, people in the highest priority band are placed in social housing after waits of more than two years. Among those in this band who have not yet been rehoused the waits are even longer.
Recent years have seen many reports of overall waiting times for social housing lasting many years in parts of London, but these tend to cover everyone on the waiting list, including people in low priority bands.
Figures obtained by The House under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act focus specifically on people in each council’s highest priority band – which are meant to cater to the most severe housing needs – and separately those in each council’s second-highest priority band.
The figures show that applicants who were placed in social housing by 147 councils in 2024-25 had on average spent 319 days – around 10 months – in their council’s highest housing priority band. In 40 council areas the average wait in the highest priority band was more than a year.
Among applicants who had not been rehoused at the point that councils responded to the FOI request, the average wait in the highest priority band was 551 days and counting – around a year and a half – across the 152 councils that supplied this data.
The average wait in councils’ second-highest priority bands was 501 days for applicants who were placed in social housing in 2024-25, and 669 days for applicants who were not rehoused.
Overall, there are around 300 councils in England responsible for maintaining housing registers, the waiting lists for social housing.
Deborah Garvie, policy manager at housing charity Shelter, says the long wait times are due to the “absolutely chronic shortage” of social rent homes.
“In some areas a lot of the households on the waiting list will be families that need family homes. So, if most of what comes up [as available] is one-bedroom flats, that’s not going to be suitable for them, particularly where people might need a larger family home.”
“People on the housing register often have extremely limited options for rehousing and can spend years in unsuitable or overcrowded accommodation with very little clarity on when, or if, their situation will improve,” adds Niki Lampaski, a housing activist in Hackney. “That creates a constant sense of living in limbo.”
“Being stuck on social housing waiting lists means putting our lives on hold for months and years,” says Laura Vicinanza of disabled people’s organisation Inclusion London. “The consequence is living in homes that do not meet our needs. Homes where we struggle to get in and out of the front door. Homes where we cannot access basic facilities like kitchens and bathrooms.”
“For families with disabled children, the situation can be particularly distressing,” Lampaski adds. “When medical or disability needs are involved, families often have to repeatedly evidence and re-explain the extent of their child’s condition through assessments, reviews and appeals. This leads to long periods of back and forth with the council, adding further barriers and delays with little prospect of resolution.”
Separate data published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) shows that the percentage of new mainstream social housing lettings that went to people who’d been on the waiting list for less than a year fell in 2024/25 to 50.7 per cent, its lowest level since the data was first published in 2018/19.
There’s the impact of conditions in temporary accommodation… often very cramped, with families living in one room, having to share beds
Garvie says long waits for social housing mean families who have been made homeless get stuck in often unsuitable temporary accommodation for extended periods – which brings its own knock-on costs.
“A lot of temporary accommodation doesn’t have access to Wi-Fi, there are no laundry facilities so you’re having to pay for laundry, there’s often no or inadequate cooking facilities so you can’t bulk buy food or batch cook, or in some cases you’re having to buy takeaways and ready meals which are obviously very expensive,” she says.
“And then there’s the impact of conditions in temporary accommodation as well – often very cramped, with families living in one room, having to share beds.”
Greenwich has among the longest waiting times of those councils that supplied figures. Excluding backdated cases, 33 applicants were rehoused into social housing in 2024/25 having spent on average 1,748 days – more than four and a half years – in the council’s highest priority band.
Meanwhile Greenwich’s 212 non-backdated applicants in the top band who are still yet to be rehoused have waited 2,703 days on average – nearly seven and a half years – in that highest priority tier.
The extreme length of wait times in Greenwich may be partly because the council’s highest priority tier – Band A in its housing allocation policy – is geared towards people who the council want to rehouse, rather than who necessarily want to be rehoused themselves. This includes social housing tenants who are under-occupying homes with spare bedrooms, and those living in homes with disability-related adaptations they don’t need.
Some councils said in their FOI responses that their average wait times were pushed up by under-occupying social housing tenants who the council placed in the highest priority band in order to free up family homes, but who rarely bid on properties and are reluctant to move despite potentially being hit by the ‘bedroom tax’.
“Lots of people who are affected by it don’t want to lose their home, and so they may not be bidding on homes even if they’re at the top of the list,” says Garvie. “If they are settled and happy in their home and it’s their family home, then they’re going to try and do their best to hang on to their home, like anyone would.”
Instead, it is Greenwich’s second highest priority tier – Band B1 – that covers homeless people, severely overcrowded housing, insanitary living conditions, domestic abuse and hate crime victims, and households with housing-related medical needs. But they too face ominously long waits – excluding backdated cases, average waits in Band B1 were 761 days for applicants who were placed in social housing in 2024/25, and 1,152 days for those yet to be rehoused – more than two years and three years respectively.
A Greenwich Council spokesperson says: “Our multi-million-pound Greenwich Build programme will deliver 1,750 sustainable new homes, with over 588 homes now complete or underway. This programme is the largest for any local authority in the country and we are on course to rehouse around 2,000 households this year.”
In Hastings, applicants who were placed in social housing in 2024/25 had spent 1,042 days on average in Band A, while those still waiting for housing have spent 709 days in the top tier. Hastings’ Band A covers under-occupiers, but also people whose housing conditions present an immediate threat of serious injury or death, or who urgently need to move to significantly improve their medical condition or disability.
Glenn Haffenden, leader of Hastings Borough Council and lead councillor for housing, says: “We have seen record rises in house prices and rents and with Local Housing Allowance failing to rise alongside rents, residents on lower incomes have found it impossible to meet their own need for housing without seeking help from the council.”
The longest wait times are generally in London, the South East and Essex – but average waits of more than a year can also be found in Coventry, Newark and Sherwood, Bradford, East Suffolk, Cornwall, Chesterfield, Birmingham, Nottingham and Trafford, among others.
Some councils ‘backdate’ certain types of social housing applicant, such as children’s care leavers, to boost their chances of being housed. This can make their average wait times seem longer than they really are. The House’s FOI request specifically asked councils to exclude such backdated applications from their figures.
Last year the government announced £39bn in funding for social and affordable housing over 10 years, with an aim of delivering 300,000 homes, with at least 60 per cent at social rents. The announcement was welcomed by Shelter as a “good start”.
A spokesperson for MHCLG says: “We know waiting lists are often far too long and we’re taking action to give people the stability and security they deserve. We’re building 1.5 million homes and investing a record £39bn in social and affordable housing to help councils get spades in the ground.
“This is alongside our changes to right to buy, which will make sure councils can keep hold of desperately needed homes.”
Politics
Would-be-winners claim Reform stiffed them on prize
Reform attracted controversy recently after it conducted a prize giveaway. This upset people for a couple of reasons: the first was that Nigel Farage’s motley crew are supposed to be a political party, not a daytime TV show. The second was that the two winners had a historic connection to Nigel Farage.
The prize in question should have seen Reform paying the electric bill for everyone in the winners’ street for a year. Now, various residents have come forward to claim Farage is stiffing them:
This is just cruel. First you entice people to sign up for something they need to get their personal data and then you only reward those who are already your devoted fans. https://t.co/tWKq40NsaK pic.twitter.com/MsYOYHdIZo
— Stella Tsantekidou (@Stsantek) April 19, 2026
Stiffed by Reform
Obviously the purpose of all this was to grab headlines and make it look like Reform are the anti-nasty party. Odd, then, that they’d decide to leave out some households. This was always going to generate negative press, and now here we are.
This is what widow Angie Ecclestone told reporters:
I thought to myself I’ll believe it when I see it but I didn’t realise I had been excluded and that my neighbours had all received a letter and instructions.
Nigel Farage said the whole street [would be included] but we haven’t heard anything. I am in shock. I am the first house on St Malo Road. It’s the whole street or not the street. I am mortified.
Additionally:
My husband died in August last year and one of my kids has his GCSEs in three weeks.
I have the biggest house in the street. It’s five bedrooms. I pay £400 per month on energy. All the other houses are semi-detached but this one is fully detached. I am really up against it.
We’re unsure why the party decided to leave out Ecclestone, but it seems like they couldn’t have picked a worse person to screw over from a marketing perspective.
Obviously the human element should come before marketing, but let’s be real; Reform aren’t doing this because they’re caring human beings; they’re doing it because they want to look good in the papers.
It doesn’t end with Ecclestone either:
Nigel Farage promised to cover a "whole street’s" energy bills. Now, at least three households say they were excluded and haven’t received a penny. Including the first house of the street.
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) April 19, 2026
“Absolutely not a Reform fan”
Fraser Hayes is another of the un-rewarded neighbours. In his own words:
I have no qualms about depriving Reform of the money and giving to a local kids’ charity or maybe even the Labour candidate.
[The stunt] is appalling. It’s obviously a data grab. They’re trying to get loads of people to write in and they ask, ‘Who did you vote for last time. Who will you vote for this time?’
I am absolutely not a Reform fan and I am appalled that anyone is.
Did Farage leave Hayes out because he can’t stand them?
And if so, would it not have been smarter to just give him the juice and avoid the bad press?
The third resident is Matt Johnson, who said:
We thought we would hear something from Reform by email or post but at the moment we haven’t heard anything.
I mean if Reform said at the time it would be the whole street, then we feel like we should be included in that.
Our energy bills keep going up and down but they are around £3,500 a year. Having them paid for would make a huge difference.
What we’re seeing here is what the UK will be like under a Reform government.
Farage’s party will sweep in on a wave of big promises, but nothing will happen, and they’ll ignore anyone asking ‘what gives?‘
Thinking ahead
Looking at St Malo Road on Google Maps, there seems to be about 18 properties. You have to wonder what would have happened if the winner lived on a street with some hundred or so detached houses. Would Reform really have paid for every one of them?
We imagine it didn’t consider that, because they don’t seem to have considered anything.
For more on Farage’s party’s chaotic local election campaign, check out the following:
- Reform activist said ‘Hitler was right’.
- Reform candidate wants to ‘tear down’ the NHS.
- Reform UK accused of ‘nil vetting’ as another racist candidate exposed.
- Reform welcome candidate who thanked Putin.
- Day One Reform activist accuses party of ‘sewer’ politics in explosive resignation letter.
- Farage heckled at Reform’s Jimmy Saville-aping London launch.
- Video emerges of Reform’s ‘Nazi salute’ candidate drink driving.
Featured image via The Canary
By Willem Moore
Politics
Autistic Son’s Quirk In Airport Bathroom Riles Up Stranger
As my daughter and I stepped out of our respective stalls in the airport bathroom, I saw my son standing in the corner waiting for us, having come in after he had used the men’s room next door. He has a habit of eloping at airports, so I was relieved to see him.
“Love,” I told him. “Thank you for coming in and waiting for us.” The three of us moved to the sink to wash our hands. That’s when things got weird.
My son has high-functioning autism, what used to be called Asperger’s syndrome, now called autism spectrum disorder, level 1 support. When people look at him, they notice nothing different. When they hear him speak, they are often impressed at his verbal comprehension and articulation (indeed, his IQ is very high in this area). His challenges lay in perseverations (obsessions or ruminations), recognising social cues, and having spatial and environmental awareness.
He received his diagnosis at age 7, in March 2020, days before the COVID shutdowns. Suddenly every resource in our small town was unavailable. We started homeschooling and would continue it long after schools reopened. My son loved our home routine, probably because he got to see the family dog whenever he wanted. He’s always had a special connection to animals (music too).
He’s a seasoned and easy traveler, having taken his first flight at 2 months old, which I’m thankful for. Still, traveling is not without stress. He tends to wander away at airports. Over the years I’ve had several moments of pure fear when I didn’t immediately know where he was. One time, after landing and coming into the airport, he bolted for the bathroom without telling me. Another time he proceeded to try and leave the airport because he didn’t want to wait in the TSA line.
Over the years I’ve accepted that most of the time he lives in another world — his inner dimension. While it’s rich and creative and weird and wonderful, there have been moments where I’ve begged him to live in our world more often, not for my convenience but for his safety. Since, on this day, we were in Los Angeles International Airport, one of the busiest airports in the world, I was on high alert. Because of his relatively young age (11), I didn’t think it was strange that he was in the crowded women’s bathroom with us.
My son also has a fascination with sink and toilet holes. He studies the shape of them, talks about them, wants to see as many of them as he can, both in people’s homes and in public places. It’s always been his way. And, according to him, this particular sink hole in this bathroom at LAX had a unique shape — it was less round and more square than most sink holes.
After retrieving his phone from his pocket, he took a photo of it. That’s when an older woman – one I’d noticed had been watching us – snapped. She was washing her hands in the sink next to where my son was, and I saw her look over at him. She started yelling, “This boy took a picture in the women’s room!” She repeated this loudly for everyone to hear as she dried her hands, as she grabbed her luggage, as she followed us out the door.
I felt a combination of embarrassment and anger at the scene she was making, trying to call attention to my son’s odd but harmless behaviour. She was still repeating it as we all walked out the door: “He took a picture in the women’s room!” Her posture was menacing and meant to be intimidating.
We separated from her and moved to the side of the hallway to regroup. My son and daughter, not fully comprehending what was happening, stood close to me with their suitcases. Even though we were now a few yards away from her, I could still feel her eyes on us, particularly me. I could sense her judgment for allowing such behaviour from my child. I could tell she was waiting for me to berate my son for taking the photo.
What happened next was horrifying. I did exactly what she wanted me to.
Against my gut feeling, which told me my son was innocent, against my understanding of his diagnosis, against my hard-won advocacy of him at school and with medical providers, against my purported assertiveness with strangers and others who may not be conscious of why he behaves the way he does, I scolded him for his actions. I asked him, not in a friendly way, why he chose to take a photo of the sink, even though I knew exactly why. I told him it was inappropriate and that he knew better, even when I knew it wasn’t true, that he didn’t know. I made sure the woman was within earshot. As I went on, my son looked stunned, confused and hurt.
The worst part is that I love his innocence, his youthful quirkiness, his sweet naiveté that sometimes comes with autism. And here I was chipping away at that, all because a stranger assumed the worst of him. I was doing the opposite of what I’ve always done.
The woman’s gaze was gone. She had folded herself into the crowd and disappeared. My son, overwhelmed and teary with emotion, bolted toward our departing gate, which fortunately wasn’t far. I took a breath, took my daughter’s hand and followed my son to the gate. It was there, in our seats waiting for the boarding call, that I apologised. I cried. Never in all of motherhood had I felt so low. I told him I was aghast at my behaviour, that I should have stood up for him, that I knew what he had done was innocent. I asked for forgiveness. I told him to take his time. I am perpetually grateful that I got it.
An hour later in the air, I was still brooding, replaying the scene over and over in my head. I found myself looking for the woman, imagining, relishing in what I’d say to her in a raised voice: that she had no right to yell at us, to shame us, to treat my son as though he was a paedophile. That she had been bullying an autistic boy. See that boy over there? Do you know he has autism? You should be ashamed of yourself.
That last thought gave me pause. Would I really disclose his diagnosis? To what end? Is it her business? Would it have made a difference? Would I be hoping to better explain his behaviour or to make her feel bad? And as my children grow older (my daughter also has autism), I find myself regarding their privacy more, wanting to protect them. Because I constantly wonder if the world will be too much for their sensitive souls. Or perhaps they will be too much for the world.
The diagnosis of “autism” first appeared in 1980 in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the bible for all things psychological, under the category of Pervasive Developmental Disorders. Before then, it was considered to be part of schizophrenia. In 1987, the DSM was revised (as it is every five to seven years), and the criteria for the diagnosis was broadened to include more mild symptoms of autism. That, coupled with improved early screening tools and an increased awareness, have led to a perception of a significant rise in the disorder, though it’s actually that we’ve gotten better at recognising it.
In the latest DSM, it is listed as autism spectrum disorder, typically followed by the level of support needed (1 through 3). My children are both level 1, which include accommodations such as extra time to transition between activities, managing perseverations and inflexibility in routine, and navigating pervasive and narrow interests (such as sink holes).
In the end, I arrived at the conclusion that no, I would choose not to disclose his diagnosis to this angry stranger. She didn’t deserve to know. She didn’t deserve an explanation. In a different setting, where emotions weren’t so charged, I might have a different answer.
With my son’s blessing, I wrote this essay to give voice to the fine line that parents of children with autism walk, the line between advocating for our kids and guarding their privacy, the line between explaining and keeping quiet, the line between supporting a need and excusing behaviour. It’s within these nuances where we live day by day, sometimes hour by hour. Sometimes I don’t get the answer right, but all answers come from a place of care and love.
For people who may not have or even know children like mine, I wrote this to encourage more empathy in the world. These days it is too easy to rush to conclusions about a child’s behaviour, judge another’s parenting and shame what is not acceptable to us. I encourage everyone to lean into curiosity and compassion as much as possible, know that we are doing the best job we can, and that our children are amazing people.
As my daughter and I stepped out of our respective stalls in the airport bathroom, I saw my son standing in the corner waiting for us, and I was so proud of him. Going forward, I refuse to feel anything else about him — and I’ll make sure he and everyone else know it.
Lorna Rose is a Pacific Northwest writer and speaker. Her writing has been recognised by Pacific Northwest Writers Association and the Oregon Poetry Association, and has appeared in About Place Journal, Jellyfish Review, Painted Bride Quarterly, Writers Resist, and elsewhere. Previously she has written about raising children with autism for Scary Mommy and Motherwell. Currently an MFA candidate at Augsburg University, Lorna is at work on a memoir about going from L.A. party girl to trail worker in rural Alaska. When not wrangling her two children, she fantasises about being interviewed on NPR’s “Fresh Air.” You can find more about her at www.lornarose.com.
This piece was previously published on HuffPost and is being shared again as part of HuffPost Personal’s “Best Of” series.
Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.
Politics
Lyrid Meteor Shower 2026: Where, How, And When To See It
This April is a good month for stargazers. There’s the “planet parade” of Saturn, Mars, Mercury, and Neptune, ending on the 23rd.
And the Lyrid meteor shower, which started on 16 April and will end on the 25th, is set to show us its most dazzling display this week too.
What is the Lyrid meteor shower?
First recorded in 678 BE, the phenomenon includes debris which once followed in the wake of comet C/1861 G1 Thatcher.
They look from the Earth’s perspective like they’re shooting from the constellation Lyra, right beside the star Vega; hence the name.
It’s not exactly that they’re “shooting” towards from across space, though. We’re passing through the patch of space rubble in our journey around the sun, and we draw in some of the material as we do so.
That means the path of the Earth’s orbit determines the direction the meteors seem to come from.
When they enter our atmosphere, the objects move so fast that they compress the air and heat it, raising their surfaces to 1600°C.
That leaves them with a bright surface as they burn, which looks like a streak to us.
It’s rare for objects in a meteor shower to make it to the Earth’s ground, as most are too small and burn out too quickly. If they do reach us, though, they become “meteorites”.
When can I see the 2026 Lyrid meteor shower in the UK?
It will end on April 25, but the most dazzling displays are expected on Wednesday, 22 April, when the shower peaks.
To get the most out of the meteor shower, look at the dark for 20-30 minutes to help your eyes adjust to the light levels (don’t look at your phone during this period!).
The best shows may come after midnight.
Where can I watch the 2026 Lyrid meteor shower in the UK?
While April’s planet parade will be a lot harder to see in the northern hemisphere than it is in the south, the opposite is true of the Lyrid meteor shower.
If you have access to unobstructed, clear, dark skies, your odds of seeing the event are higher. Beaches, the tops of hills, and fields are all good spots.
How should I watch the 2026 Lyrid meteor shower?
It should be visible to the naked eye.
The longer you look, Space.com noted, the likelier you are to spot something out of this world.
Politics
Nick Robinson Denounces Minister Over Mandelson Scandal
Nick Robinson monstered a cabinet minister over the Peter Mandelson scandal in an extraordinary live radio clash.
The veteran Today programme presenter told Scottish secretary Douglas Alexander it was “frankly preposterous” to claim Keir Starmer knew nothing about the shamed former peer’s business and personal links before making his the UK’s ambassador to Washington.
Mandelson was sacked after just six months in the role after the full extent of his friendship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was revealed.
It emerged last week that he was also failed security vetting, allegedly over his lobbying company’s links to China, but was still cleared to take up the job.
The prime minister is facing calls to resign over the scandal and will face MPs in the House of Commons on Monday afternoon to explain himself.
On the Today programme, Alexander insisted the PM had done nothing wrong and had in fact been let down by civil servants.
But Robinson told him: “What more did you need to know? We know that Peter Mandelson had business links with China, we know that he had business links with Russia, we know that he had personal links with Jeffrey Epstein.
“And not only do we know it, the prime minister knew it, because we know as a matter of record that Jonathan Powell, the national security adviser, said ‘this appointment process is weirdly rushed’.
“So why did the prime minister appoint someone without waiting for the vetting?”
Alexander insisted “information was withheld from the prime minister and from other ministers” during the vetting process.
Robinson told him: “To come on the radio and claim that there was any surprise that Peter Mandelson had any links to Jeffrey Epstein, links to China, links to Russia … it is frankly preposterous.”
But the minister said: “The deep vetting process is undertaken specifically to look at information that was not in the public domain.
“If this process really matters, then I think your listeners will reasonably think why wasn’t the outcome of that deep vetting shared with ministers making their decisions?”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Bayern Munich continue their dominance of the Bundesliga, claiming their 35th title
Bayern Munich have clinched the German football league title for the 35th time in their history, with four matches remaining in the season, following a 4-2 home victory over Stuttgart on Sunday 19 April at the Allianz Arena in Matchday 30, thus rounding off a perfect week both domestically and in Europe.
Bayern Munich: winners again
The Bavarian side, who are still in contention for the domestic treble of the league, cup and Champions League, had previously reached the semi-finals of the continental competition after knocking out Real Madrid, thus continuing their strong season on all fronts, whilst also edging closer to the domestic cup final, where they will face Bayer Leverkusen.
With this triumph, Bayern continues its dominance of German football, as this title marks their 13th in the last 14 Bundesliga seasons, with Bayer Leverkusen having broken this run only in the 2023–2024 season.
The team have taken their tally to 79 points at the top of the table, 15 points clear of second-placed Borussia Dortmund, who stumbled to a 2-1 defeat against Hoffenheim in the same round.
Bayern now face a series of crucial fixtures, taking on Bayer Leverkusen in the Cup semi-final next Wednesday, then Mainz in the league on Saturday, before travelling to France to face Paris Saint-Germain in the first leg of the Champions League semi-final on 28 April, with the return leg scheduled for 6 May.
Featured image via the Canary
By Alaa Shamali
Politics
9 Signs Your Relationship Isn’t Worth Fighting For
No one said relationships were easy ― even the strongest couples will inevitably hit a few bumps in the road. But your partner shouldn’t be a constant source of stress, hurt feelings or resentment.
So how do you know if your relationship has hit the point of no return? Automatic dealbreakers like abusive behaviour aside, many issues can be worked through with time, commitment and help from a therapist.
But if you’ve tried and tried and things still don’t improve, or if your partner is simply unwilling to do the work, it could be time to move on.

stock-eye via Getty Images
We asked experts to share the signs that a relationship may no longer be worth fighting for. (Note that the advice below is meant to serve as general suggestions. The circumstances of each relationship are different; there’s no one-size-fits-all approach.)
1. You’re being abused — physically or emotionally.
“If your spouse pushes, shoves, grabs or hits you for any reason, it’s not worth trying to change them. If this is happening on any level, get out NOW. Are they gaslighting you or being emotionally abusive? If your partner tells you that you are imagining any type of abusive behavior or that you are just ‘too sensitive,’ get out. You deserve to be treated with respect. It’s not worth fighting about.” ― Tammy Nelson, a sex therapist in New Haven, Connecticut, and author of The New Monogamy: Redefining Your Relationship After Infidelity
2. You feel like you’re the only one fighting for the relationship.
“I actually don’t think it’s a good idea to be in a relationship if you feel like you are always fighting to remain in it. However, sometimes it does make sense to try very hard for a period of time to get through a rough patch and move on. If you’re always the one putting in effort and your partner shows minimal effort, that is a sign that it’s not worth fighting for. If you are embarrassed to tell people about the amount of effort you have to put into the relationship to keep it going, that is a sign that you may have exceeded an appropriate amount of effort.” ― Marie Land, a psychologist in Washington, D.C.
3. Your partner refuses to seek help for personal issues or problems within the relationship.
“It takes much caring and courage to be vulnerable enough to reach out for help. We all need it sometimes. If you’re consistently feeling miserable in the relationship and your partner is unwilling to accept help, whether it’s couples counseling or addressing an addiction that is damaging the relationship, it may be time to consider leaving.” ― John Amodeo, marriage and family therapist in San Francisco and author of Dancing with Fire: A Mindful Way to Loving Relationships
4. You can’t stand kissing your partner.
“Yes, this feeling can come and go. Sometimes you like to kiss, other times you don’t even want your partner’s face anywhere near yours. But if your mouth is telling you that you really cannot stand to kiss your partner anymore and that feeling doesn’t change over time, it might be over.” ― Nelson
5. Your close friends have serious doubts about the relationship.
“Who is the person that sees your relationship most clearly? The research shows that your friends actually have more insight into the state of the relationship than you do, particularly female best friends. If they’re starting to express concerns, it can reveal underlying issues that you may not be aware of yourself.” ― Gary Lewandowski, professor of psychology at Monmouth University in New Jersey and co-creator of ScienceOfRelationships.com
6. Your partner isn’t reliable.
“I’ve been married 30 years, and here is why I have fought for my marriage during challenging times: My husband is trustworthy and reliable. A reason to leave is when the trust is irrevocably broken — by lies about money spent, adultery or repeated emotional and physical abuse. You deserve someone you can unfailingly count on. To me, reliability is the sexiest quality you can hope for — a quality that is essential in an intimate partnership, as we live in a shaky and inconsistent world.” ― Iris Krasnow, author of Surrendering to Marriage and The Secret Lives of Wives
7. You or your partner has had multiple affairs.
“Are you using infidelity as a ‘can opener’? Be fair. End your relationship now. Don’t make your partner responsible for your ambivalence.” ― Nelson
8. You’ve stopped making progress in other areas of your life because of the relationship.
“If your relationship has taken up so much emotional energy and attention that it has prevented you from moving forward with other goals such as a career, family and friendships, that’s a sign that your relationship may not be worth fighting for. Some sacrifice is fine but the cost should be minimal and not impact your progress in other areas for an extended period of time.” ― Land
9. Your partner routinely dismisses your concerns.
“It’s not an encouraging sign if your partner is unwilling or unable to hear your feelings, your hurt and pain and take it to heart. If your feelings and needs (for respect, kindness, communication) are coldly and consistently dismissed, if stonewalling and defensiveness are creating an impenetrable barrier, it may leave you feeling lonely, angry, or depressed, and maybe hopeless about the relationship.” ― Amodeo
The original version of this story was published on HuffPost at an earlier date.
Help and support:
If you, or someone you know, is in immediate danger, call 999 and ask for the police. If you are not in immediate danger, you can contact:
- The Freephone 24 hour National Domestic Abuse Helpline, run by Refuge: 0808 2000 247
- In Scotland, contact Scotland’s 24 hour Domestic Abuse and Forced Marriage Helpline: 0800 027 1234
- In Northern Ireland, contact the 24 hour Domestic & Sexual Violence Helpline: 0808 802 1414
- In Wales, contact the 24 hour Life Fear Free Helpline on 0808 80 10 800.
- National LGBT+ Domestic Abuse Helpline: 0800 999 5428
- Men’s Advice Line: 0808 801 0327
- Respect helpline (for anyone worried about their own behaviour): 0808 802 4040
Politics
Olivia Colman’s Heartstopper Character Recast With Anna Maxwell Martin Taking Over
Olivia Colman’s character in Heartstopper will be played by a different actor in the show’s upcoming film.
The Oscar winner received widespread praise for her portrayal of Nick’s mum, Sarah Nelson, in the first two seasons of the Netflix teen drama.
However, in its third iteration, Olivia was unable to appear, with Hayley Atwell instead appearing as Nick’s aunt, who served a maternal role in his life for these episodes.
Over the weekend, it was confirmed that in the forthcoming movie Heartstopper Forever, the character of Sarah has been completely recast due to Olivia’s unavailability.
In her absence, the role will now be played by Line Of Duty and Motherland star Anna Maxwell Martin.
Heartstopper creator Alice Oseman told Netflix’s Tudum: “When beginning to work on the Heartstopper Forever screenplay, I knew how important it was that Sarah, Nick’s mum, appeared in the story.
“Since season one, we have seen how close Nick is with his mum; she’s one of the few people he can turn to in moments of crisis. While in season three, we were able to tweak the story to avoid any appearance of Sarah, it felt nonsensical for her to be absent from this final chapter, given some of the emotional struggles Nick faces.”
They continued: “Sadly, Olivia Colman was not able to join us for the film, so we made the very difficult decision to recast the role, rather than exclude the character. We are deeply grateful for Olivia’s beautiful performance as Sarah in seasons one and two of Heartstopper, through such iconic moments as Nick coming out as bisexual, and we know that her performance will live on in the hearts of every Heartstopper fan.
“We are overjoyed to welcome the incredible Anna Maxwell Martin into the role of Sarah for Heartstopper Forever. Anna perfectly embodies Sarah’s gentle, down-to-earth energy, and it was magical to witness her scenes with Kit Connor during the film shoot. I can’t wait for Heartstopper fans to experience her interpretation of Sarah Nelson.”

Heartstopper Forever will premiere on Netflix later this year, and serve as the final outing for Nick and Charlie, played by Kit Connor and Joe Locke.
As well as the usual returning cast members, including Yasmin Finney and Will Gao, it’s been confirmed that Bafta winner Derek Jacobi will also be playing a new character in the film.
Politics
Adam Thomas Addresses David Haye I’m A Celebrity South Africa Row
I’m A Celebrity campmate Adam Thomas has spoken out about feeling “pushed to my limits” by co-star David Haye during their stint on the reality show’s All Stars special.
Adam and David were among the famous faces who took part in the second season of I’m A Celebrity: South Africa, which was filmed last year and is currently airing on ITV1.
Over the course of the series, the retired pro boxer has generated a whole lot of controversy for his overzealous approach to the game, his treatment of his fellow contestants and his comments about his girlfriend, Sian Osborne.
In the most recent instalment on Friday night, viewers saw David lambasting Adam for sitting out a Bushtucker Trial on medical grounds, after a flare-up of his psoriatic arthritis.
During the episode, David branded Adam “useless”, claiming that as a “grown-arse man” he should have taken part in the challenge.
The pair then clashed again when Adam sneaking chocolate into the camp for the team to share resulted in them losing out on food later on, which David had earned during that day’s trial.
Adam then offered to have less of the rations than his campmates, which David branded a “hollow gesture”.
On Sunday, the Emmerdale star posted a picture of himself in the I’m A Celebrity: South Africa camp, admitting that the “picture breaks my heart, as I know on the inside what I was dealing with”.
“Truth be told, I thought it was all my fault,” he said. “I now know that’s not the reality…”

Adam wrote: “My time in I’m a Celebrity South Africa was one of the toughest things I’ve ever been through, physically, mentally, and emotionally. Watching it back hasn’t been easy at all.
“There were moments I felt pushed to my absolute limit, and if I’m honest, times I didn’t even recognise myself. Living with arthritis is something I don’t really talk about, as much as I should do… but in there it really took its toll.
“My biggest fight was pretending to put on a brave face and trying to hide the pain! That can be exhausting within itself. There were days my body just didn’t want to keep going, but I did. I won’t sit here and say I handled everything perfectly, because I didn’t.
“I wish I spoke up for myself sooner. I wish I stood my ground instead of trying to keep the peace, but I’ve learned that being kind doesn’t mean being weak, and sometimes it takes going through tough moments to find your voice.”
He continued: “Since coming out, I’ve taken time to process everything, and I’m in a much better place now. I let go of the anger, had the conversations I needed to have, and chose peace.
“What I’m most proud of, is at times like this I wanted to walk, I wanted to quit but I didn’t. Even when I wanted to walk away, even when it felt like too much, I never give up! and that means everything to me.”
Adam added: “He broke me in there, he pushed me to my limits, and I’ve told David this and he’s apologised and that’s that! I’ve moved on now, am not one to hold a grudge.
“But thank you for all your lovely messages and all the kind words. We all face people and situations that try to break us, but sometimes those moments are what rebuild you stronger than ever. Be kind.”
Even hosts Ant and Dec have spoken out about David’s conduct on the current series of I’m A Celebrity: South Africa, suggesting that his conduct has “crossed the line from banter”.
Because the All Star run was pre-recorded, I’m A Celebrity viewers won’t have any say in who stays and goes until the live final, when fans will be able to crown their champion via public vote.
Politics
The case for a UK-EU resilience partnership
Jannike Wachowiak makes the case for a UK-EU resilience partnership as a way to both help the two sides be better prepared and able to respond to certain crises and to provide much needed impetus to the UK-EU reset.
The first post-Brexit UK-EU summit, held in 2025, provided a roadmap of measures intended to soften the edges of the Brexit deal negotiated by Boris Johnson. The second is pencilled in for the summer, and its primary function is clear: to get ongoing talks on agrifood-trade, emission trading and a youth experience scheme over the line. Yet a summit that merely deals with outstanding business is one that is not doing its job. As well as closing negotiations already underway, it is important, not least to maintain a sense of momentum about the UK-EU ‘reset’, to lock the two sides into a continuing process.
Absent new ideas, it will be hard to avoid the impression that the reset is beginning to run out of steam. Various ideas have been suggested – ranging from the UK joining Creative Europe to a UK-EU Industrial Cooperation Council – that would build on the Common Understanding without crossing red lines.
Another idea that would fit the bill, and which has received precious little attention, is the possibility of forming a UK-EU ‘resilience partnership’ to ensure both sides are better prepared and able to respond to certain crises.
Pandemics, wars and climate emergencies like floods, wildfires and severe storms are increasingly common, and cannot be contained in one country. These externalities create precisely the kind of rationale that underpins cooperation among neighbours. What is more, the effects of these crises are increasingly visible to citizens. In 2025, Portugal and Spain experienced the worst wildfires since records began, and across England 6.3 million properties are based in areas at risk of flooding. And most of us have first-hand experience of a global pandemic. This should make crisis preparedness and response an uncontroversial area for cooperation.
And there is a global dimension to this. The Trump administration is pulling the US out of the multilateral global health and climate security systems, with significant cuts to domestic and international crisis prevention programmes. On the day of his inauguration, President Trump ordered the US’ withdrawal from the World Health Organisation, and a year later he announced the US would withdraw from another 66 international organisations, treaties and agencies, many of which are climate-related. This creates a clear need for Europeans to fill the vacuum bilaterally and globally.
Part of the response could be a ‘Resilience Partnership’ to enhance collective resilience and preparedness. This could have several components. The two sides might want to set up a dedicated ‘Health and Climate Security Dialogue ‘to both share information and explore how to build on existing cooperation, including the UK’s association to the EU’s Critical Medicines Alliances and medical research and innovation under the Horizon Programme.
The UK-EU Security and Defence Partnership from May 2025 encourages closer cooperation in these areas, but without going into specifics. The EU and Canada are already a step ahead, with a dedicated ‘Health Dialogue’ set up in 2021, and the promise of a ‘Climate Security Dialogue’ to share climate data and analysis. Given the global dimension, there could be an incentive to create links between the EU’s various dialogues with like-minded partners.
A dedicated EU-UK dialogue could be a launching pad for more formalised ties. For instance to consider whether to include the UK in the activities of the European Climate and Health Observatory. The observatory was set up in 2021, is managed by the Commission and European Environment Agency, and supports 38 members and cooperating countries in preparing for and adapting to the impacts of climate change on human health.
Another possibility would be UK association to the EU Civil Protection Programme. This helps to mobilise resources (like response teams and equipment) and knowledge to support countries affected by war and natural disasters. The largest operation to date has been in support of Ukraine, and the mechanism has also recently been used to coordinate consular support for citizens stranded in the Middle East.
The UK used to be an active and reliable member of the Civil Protection Programme and contributed to 14 emergency operations between 2014 and 2020. Post-Brexit, it could seek association. The programme is open to non-EU member states and includes ten participating countries ranging from Moldova to Norway to Ukraine.
Exploring a ‘Resilience Partnership’ along those lines would an easy win. It would give renewed impetus to the bilateral relationship and make it clear that the reset is ongoing. For the UK, it fits into the government’s preference for incremental progress and does not cross its red lines. For the EU, ‘resilience’ is one of four areas which it wants to see strengthened in its relations vis-à-vis the UK (as outlined in the Commission’s 2024-2029 political guidelines).
For both sides, it would be a pragmatic step forward which could be easily sold to the public. Last but not least, it would further build trust and provide a sense of solidarity which could help pave the ground for other steps further down the line.
By Jannike Wachowiak, Research Associate, UK in a Changing Europe.
-
Crypto World7 days agoThe SEC Conditionalises DeFi Platforms to Be Avoided for Broker Registration
-
NewsBeat6 days agoTrump and Pope Leo: Behind their disagreement over Iran war
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Theodora Dress
-
Crypto World6 days agoSEC Signals Exemption for Crypto Interfaces From Broker Registration
-
News Videos5 days agoSecure crypto trading starts with an FIU-registered
-
Sports3 days agoNWFL Suspends Two Players Over Post-Match Clash in Ado-Ekiti
-
Crypto World6 days agoSEC Proposes Certain Crypto Interfaces Don’t Need to Register as Brokers
-
Business19 hours agoPowerball Result April 18, 2026: No Jackpot Winner in Powerball Draw: $75 Million Rolls Over
-
Crypto World2 days agoRussia Pushes Bill to Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Politics3 days agoPalestine barred from entering Canada for FIFA Congress
-
Sports7 days agoNWFL opens Pathway for new Clubs ahead of 2026 Season
-
Business4 days agoCreo Medical agree sale of its manufacturing operation
-
Politics24 hours agoZack Polanski demands ‘council homes not luxury flats for foreign investors’
-
Entertainment6 days agoBrand New Day’ Footage Reveals the Devastating Impact of ‘Now Way Home’
-
Tech5 days agoMicrosoft adds Windows protections for malicious Remote Desktop files
-
Entertainment6 days agoKarol G’s ‘Ultra Raunchy’ Coachella Set Gave ‘Satanic Vibes’
-
Sports7 days agoAaron Judge says Yankees need to ‘simplify’ approach amid offensive slump
-
Entertainment7 days agoHow Babylon 5 Turned Brief Side Story Into Emotional Masterpiece
-
Tech6 days agoWhat was the first ransomware attack to demand payment in Bitcoin?
-
Tech4 days ago‘Avatar: Aang, The Last Airbender’ Leaked Online. Some Fans Say Paramount Deserves the Fallout

You must be logged in to post a comment Login