Connect with us

Politics

Why is Zack Polanski campaigning in Urdu?

Published

on

Why is Zack Polanski campaigning in Urdu?

They say you campaign in poetry and govern in prose. On current form, the Green Party of England and Wales seems intent on campaigning in Urdu and governing in Lahore.

What else could explain Green leader Zack Polanski’s decision to make a video in Pakistan’s official language? He’s barely been his party’s candidate for Holborn and St Pancras five minutes and already he’s decided to dust off Google Translate and take to social media.

Truly, Zack is a man of many talents. In his latest viral video, the all-singing, all-dancing, bap-boosting eco-bore makes his pitch to the voters of this Central London seat, left vacant by the resignation of Keir Starmer, in some very (and I’m no expert) ropey Urdu.

Advertisement

What’s he saying? I’ve no idea. But nor will almost all of his would-be constituents. The most commonly spoken ‘main languages’ – other than English – in hyper-diverse Camden are French, Bengali and Spanish. According to the council, ‘Other South Asian’ languages are the main language of 575 people in the entire borough. In other words, only a tiny handful of them would be incapable of understanding Zack if he had simply spoken in English.

The Greens have rightly been hauled over the coals for their willingness to campaign along sectarian lines, to ride Britain’s crisis of integration to inner-city electoral success. At the Gorton and Denton by-election, Hannah Spencer tried her hand at Urdu, too. Whole videos in Urdu were released painting Reform as ‘Islamophobes’ and Labour as in the pocket of India’s Narendra Modi.

It made for a dispiriting spectacle, all but making a virtue out of the fact that some of Spencer’s now constituents are so poorly integrated they can’t speak solid English, all while ruthlessly exploiting ethno-religious divides.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Advertisement

Please wait…

Advertisement

But at least that made a rank kind of sense. Gorton and Denton, unlike Holborn and St Pancras, has a sizeable Pakistani-origin population (both, incidentally, have significant numbers of Bangladeshis). It’s hard to work out whether Zack is merely ignorant of those he seeks to represent or trying to rage-bait us into talking about him.

Whatever the reasoning here, the Greens’ Urdu electioneering reminds us of the Balkanisation of British politics wrought by mass migration, multiculturalism and outdated, lax election rules that allow Commonwealth citizens to vote so long as they are legally resident in the UK. They needn’t be British citizens nor speak the language nor have been here for any particular length of time. And yet they have the same vote as anyone else.

Advertisement

This has only incentivised political parties to engage in pork-barrel identity politics whenever an election rolls around: campaigning in foreign languages, leaning into tribal grievances, and even – in some cases – exploiting ‘kinship’ networks to ‘harvest’ votes. What should be an exercise in universalism, in appealing to voters as voters, has been reduced to an ethnic headcount.

The Greens are just more shameless and online about it all. Where before Labour would push leaflets through letterboxes claiming the Conservatives don’t care about Kashmir, or Tory London mayoral hopefuls would fear-monger about Sadiq Khan betraying Sikhs, now Polanski et al are funnelling purposefully divisive content into the TikTok-Instagram-WhatsApp-group pipeline.

Advertisement

Like so much the Greens do, these Urdu election videos are as sinister as they are cringe. Beneath the ‘Live, Laugh, Love’ exterior lurks a grim new sectarianism.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Greens Defend Zack Polanski’s Urdu Video

Published

on

Greens Defend Zack Polanski's Urdu Video

The Greens have defended a by-election campaign video in which Zack Polanski speaks in Urdu after a cabinet member said it made him feel “uncomfortable”.

In a post on social media, the party leader introduced himself and encouraged voters to back him in Holborn and St Pancras on October 8.

But business secretary Jonathan Reynolds said all voters should be able to understand what candidates say.

He told Times Radio that his views “have hardened” on the need for campaign literature to be in English.

Advertisement

“I think it’s very important, when you think about cohesion, to make sure that everyone can participate in an election,” he said.

Tory shadow communities secretary Katie Lam went even further by describing Polanski’s video as “poisonous” and should be banned.

She said: “Attempting to appeal to group-based grievances by campaigning in foreign languages is poisonous.

“We must ban this practice for good. Politics in our country should be conducted in the language of public life.”

Advertisement

But a Green Party spokesman defended the video, telling HuffPost UK: “The Greens believe that democracy doesn’t discriminate by languages spoken. Many people are bilingual.

Advertisement

“Holborn and St Pancras is a true reflection of the diversity of London and of our country and we choose to embrace and celebrate that.

“If we want to speak to people who speak Urdu, it makes sense to speak to them in Urdu. We’re proud to reach voters in as many languages as possible”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Emmys 2026 Red Carpet: Megan Stalter’s Look Stole The Show

Published

on

Emmys 2026 Red Carpet: Megan Stalter's Look Stole The Show

Hacks star Megan Stalter definitely made a big impression on this year’s Emmy Awards red carpet with her larger-than-life look.

The actor and comedian, who is currently appearing in Oh Mary! On Broadway, was pictured arriving at Monday night’s ceremony dressed as the awards statuette itself.

Megan covered herself head-to-toe in gold paint for the occasion, completing her ensemble with a gold crop top and shorts, painted gold wings and an oversized golden atom, mimicking the iconic Emmys trophy.

She was seen striking a pose on the red carpet with her Hacks co-star Paul W. Downs, rolling her prop around the red carpet and holding it above her head.

Advertisement

“I went as Paul’s Emmy – as he deserves,” she joked to Variety on the red carpet. “And my own – as I deserve!”

When asked about the inspiration behind her look, Megan joked to NBC: “I just got off a plane and we threw something together real fast.”

Megan, of course, has a history of wearing bold outfits on the red carpet.

Perhaps most notably, she and Paul parodied Timothee Chalamet and Kylie Jenner’s orange matching red carpet looks at the Critics Choice Awards earlier this year.

Advertisement

At last year’s Emmys, meanwhile, she went against the formal dress code by wearing blue jeans, a white T-shirt and a black bag emblazoned with the message: “Ceasefire!”

In April, Megan opened up to Marie Claire about why she likes to make bold statements on the red carpet.

“Every red carpet appearance or anything that I get to do in front of people, I want to have fun and make the most of it because it’s my dream,” she explained. “We worked really hard to get here, and now I want to enjoy it.”

Megan was nominated for an Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress In A Comedy at this year’s Emmys, for her role as hapless assistant Kayla in the fifth and last series of Hacks.

Advertisement

Kate O’Flynn ultimately won the award for her role as Patricia in Widow’s Bay.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The women of Piddington are being thrown to the wolves

Published

on

The women of Piddington are being thrown to the wolves

Over the past few months, the quiet Oxfordshire village of Piddington, population just 350, has become the unlikely flashpoint of Britain’s immigration crisis. Locals are so furious about plans to turn the nearby Bicester Garrison into accommodation for asylum seekers that they will today hold a non-binding referendum on whether to secede from the UK.

If the proposals to house around 1,250 asylum seekers there go ahead, the population of Piddington will be artificially inflated by a staggering 400 per cent. As pointed out by parish chairman Tim McNally, this is the proportional equivalent of adding 32million people to London overnight. Piddington’s residents will be outnumbered by nearly four to one. As if that weren’t bad enough, a recent Home Office document suggests that the true capacity of the local barracks may actually be 3,500. If these were fully utilised, migrants would then outnumber locals by a staggering 10 to one.

Worse still, Piddington’s women will be outnumbered by a significantly larger margin. Based on the lower capacity estimate of the Bicester Garrison, females would account for roughly eight per cent (about one in 12 people) of the total population, and around three per cent (about one in 29 people) under the higher capacity figures. In no other area of the UK can such a dramatic gender split be found.

Advertisement

Understandably, this impending shift has caused great anxiety among female residents. Last week campaign group Women of Piddington published an open letter addressed to the UK’s female MPs, warning that ‘Life as we know it will be destroyed’.

‘As fellow women, you will understand the serious risks this will expose us to. Our safety, our security and our freedoms will be under threat… We will not feel safe walking our streets. We are already living in fear.’

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

It should go without saying that belonging to a particular ethnic group does not inherently make one more likely to commit a violent sexual crime. Yet when men are arriving in droves from countries that the government advises women not to travel to, problems are inevitable. These men are unlikely to gain a moral software update the moment they reach the Kent coastline. Placing thousands of such men together on the outskirts of a tiny English village only compounds the insanity.

Former Conservative minister Edwina Currie said the quiet part out loud last month, when she suggested that, ‘The obvious thing that 1,200 young men are going to need… is a brothel’. While we can only hope her remark was a throwaway joke, it speaks to the grotesque logic underlying the current crisis. Indeed, as far as the government and the Home Office are concerned, the state’s primary duty is to provide for the ‘needs’ of primarily male illegal migrants. The interests of British citizens – and women in particular – are barely an afterthought, if they even are thought of at all.

Advertisement

It is parliament’s ‘duty to act’, the Women of Piddington state in their open letter. ‘There are no safeguards in place. You will be complicit. You will be to blame’, it says. ‘We are issuing an urgent call for you to stand up for the Women of Piddington.’

There is little room for evasion here. The British government can either take the concerns of women seriously or it can continue hiding behind platitudes about ‘vulnerable’ asylum seekers needing our protection. Continued silence on the threat the migration crisis poses to women is an unforgivable act of cowardice.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Cyber Cop Warns Sextortion Is Her Biggest Worry For Boys Right Now

Published

on

Sextortion largely impacts boys, according to statistics.

The next few years could see the online world transform dramatically for young people.

Changes are already trickling through. Smartphones have now been banned in schools in England, while the UK government is considering how it will implement next year’s social media ban for under-16s.

Meanwhile, the Crime and Policing Bill 2025 aims to ultimately make ‘nudification’ tools – which can digitally undress people using artificial intelligence (AI) – illegal.

‘Cyber cop’ Susan McLean is one of the experts who is watching the UK’s movements in this space with great interest. A former Victoria police officer of 27 years, who now advises governments, schools and families on online child safety, she knows her stuff about modern technology and the impact it can have on kids today. (Through her work in schools alone, she speaks to roughly 250,000 children about the topic every year.)

Advertisement

In an interview with HuffPost UK to mark her new book, Growing Up Digital, which landed in UK bookstores this month, McLean shared one of her biggest areas of concern as far as children and tech are concerned: the rise in ‘sextortion’ (or sexual extortion) cases among boys.

Earlier this year, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) warned child sextortion cases in the UK have soared by 72% in the space of a year. Criminals are tricking young people into sending nude or sexual images of themselves which are then used to blackmail them. In 97% of cases, the victims are boys.

“Probably the biggest risk to an adolescent male is sextortion and sexual blackmail – that is hideous,” said McLean, who described how organised criminal gangs sit in call centres, work a script, “and are very good at what they do”.

Sextortion largely impacts boys, according to statistics.

Rebecca Nelson via Getty Images

Sextortion largely impacts boys, according to statistics.

The online safety specialist recalled being on holiday in Europe a couple of weeks ago and seeing her phone screen flash up – an unknown Australian number was calling.

Advertisement

“I answered it and it was a 17-year-old boy in tears,” she said. “I’d spoken at his school, and he was now being sextorted online. He remembered my talk and he remembered I said I would be helpful if he needed me – and he decided to ring me.”

The expert noted she asked him to include another adult in their discussion while she advised on what to do next.

“That’s the thing,” she continued, discussing how the boy called her instead of someone close to him, “we know there’s underreporting of this crime, there’s shame attached to it, most kids will pay two amounts of money before they tell an adult and certainly we know that young men have taken their own lives.”

The mental health repercussions attached to this crime can be great. Studies have flagged a “statistically significant relationship” between experience with sextortion and suicidality.

Advertisement

McLean described how someone diagnosed with poor mental health might see a progression over a period of time, which would ultimately lead to them seeking help. But with sextortion, “what I’ve seen far too often, is that they have gone from a 100% mentally well young person into someone in psychological crisis in a matter of hours”.

She continued: “They will have been told [by criminals] that their life is over, they will have been told that they’ll never recover from this, they will have been told that they will be ruined – and, in the moment, kids believe that.”

Advice for parents when it comes to sextortion

McLean is keen for parents to educate themselves on the current technology kids are using, so they can then educate their kids about it.

Advertisement

She also highlights the importance of keeping the channels of communication open as soon as children are using devices. “I always say: talk early, talk often. The minute your child has a device, you need a conversation,” she advised.

These conversations should always be age-appropriate, of course. You’re not going to talk to a four-year-old about sextortion.

But you could start by having conversations around taking photos. If your child wants to send a photo to Grandma, for instance, you can discuss why they should always take a photo with their clothes on. And why it’s important to ask a parent first, before sending a photo to someone on a phone or computer – and why we only ever send photos to trusted grown-ups.

As children reach their tweens, the expert suggested the key message should be along the lines of: “Nothing is so bad that you can’t come and tell me about it. I don’t care what you’ve done, I don’t care what has happened … If something is bothering you, worrying you, you’re being threatened online, you’ve seen something that is not right, please come and tell me about it and we’ll work it through together.”

Advertisement

She added: “We know that a parent’s first response when they’re told something will often dictate to that young person whether they’re going to disclose more.”

Her sentiment echoes that of Australian coroner Audrey Jamieson who, back in 2022, said a shift in the way young people are taught about online safety could prevent suicide among sextortion victims.

Following the suicide of Rohan Cosgriff, who was 17 and had been the victim of a sextortion scam, she said: “The fact remains that with all the education in the world, and no matter how many times the message ‘don’t send intimate images’ is repeated, young people will continue to do these things.

“The conversation must turn to: should you find yourself in this situation, it is going to be OK.”

Advertisement

McLean suggested that parents might be distressed, upset or even angry by what their tween or teen tells them – however these emotions need to be kept under wraps. Her advice is to “remain calm, and say: ‘OK, tell me what’s happened and let’s work through it.’ All of these things can be worked through and your child will be OK”.

If your child is a victim of sextortion – whether it’s because they sent a nude photo or criminals manipulated their image or video using AI – the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) urges parents not to blame their child, and not to pay or engage further with those who are asking for money.

“Don’t delete the images, videos or messages if you still have them,” said the IWF. “Contact the police. You can make a report online here. It’s important that law enforcement is aware of what’s happening.”

Images, videos or links can also be reported using the Report Remove tool. The IWF can then see if they can get it taken down.

Advertisement

Regardless of whether you’re parenting boys, girls, primary-school aged kids or older teens, McLean urges parents to be “an active participant” in their child’s online world. You’d walk the dog with them, or take them to sport, she notes, so she advises having that same active participation when children are online.

“You need to play games with them, you need to be aware of what they’re doing, who they’re doing it with,” said McLean. “[Parents] should regularly check their devices – what apps and platforms are they using it? Who are they talking to?”

She ended: “It’s not invading their privacy, it’s parenting.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Lily Allen Responds To Ex David Harbour’s West End Girl Reaction

Published

on

Lily Allen and David Harbour pictured together in 2021

Lily Allen has responded to her ex-husband David Harbour’s recent take on her hit album West End Girl.

The British singer has previously described her latest release – which came out in October 2025 – as a work of “autofiction”, inspired by “what went on” towards the end of her marriage to the Stranger Things actor, albeit with some artistic licence applied.

Earlier this year, David broke his silence on his ex-wife’s album in a June interview with Variety.

“It is the privilege of every artist to use their experience to create art,” he responded when asked about West End Girl.”

Advertisement

“And so, I respect her for doing that,” the Black Widow actor continued, although he also stated: “I don’t think I could say it’s all true.”

“Stories are complex,” he noted. “And that’s why I say I respect her creation of art to channel her experience. [But] it wasn’t my experience.”

During a new interview with The Cut published on Monday, Lily responded to her ex’s comments about her candid songwriting.

When asked if she had “any reaction to his reaction to your art”, Lily admitted: “I think that was a generous thing for him to say.”

Advertisement

She also highlighted the critical acclaim he recently received for his drama, DTF St. Louis, for which he recently won an Emmy.

“He’s having a real moment of success as well, right?” she pointed out. “He’s been nominated for an Emmy, and it’s great.”

“We’re all doing our own thing, and we’re all doing what we’re supposed to do. If there’s one thing I know about David Harbour, it’s that he’s an excellent actor,” she added.

Lily Allen and David Harbour pictured together in 2021
Lily Allen and David Harbour pictured together in 2021

Lily and David were married for four years before splitting in December 2024.

Due to Lily’s candid songwriting, West End Girl generated lots of debate and online speculation about exactly what inspired it – which the Brit Award winner has insisted is something she doesn’t mind.

Advertisement

“If I feel really strongly about something, then great, because I will use it for my art and I will write about it. The rest of it is noise,” she said when asked about the fan response.

However, some of the rumours which came from her songwriting did frustrate the singer.

“People really filled in the blanks of the phone call at the beginning of the album, and that is interesting to me,” she stated, maintaining she “left it blank for a reason”.

She continued: “Also a lot of people have incorrectly interpreted the lyric ‘Why are we here talking about vasectomies’. I’m not going to explain to you what it actually means or why I added it in there. But it’s truly a fucked-up lyric.”

Advertisement

Lily is currently touring the US with her West End Girl tour.

Earlier in the run, the show sparked some debate online, due to the fact that Lily’s performance clocked in at under an hour, and only included songs from West End Girl, with no audience interaction.

“I am essentially acting out a past version of myself. And I’m really committed to telling that story. Like, I don’t talk to the audience. The show is very much behind a fourth wall,” she told The Cut of her current show.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House Opinion Article | Schools must be supported as the birth rate falls

Published

on

Schools must be supported as the birth rate falls
Schools must be supported as the birth rate falls


4 min read

Local authorities have the knowledge and expertise to manage falling pupil numbers, but government backing will be crucial to help limit the disruption of school closures for families and staff. 

Advertisement

What does a major capital city with no children look like? It’s a question policymakers in London are reckoning with.

The figures are stark. Reception pupil numbers have fallen in the capital since 2016, while Year 7 numbers have been declining since 2019. Around 90 schools have closed or merged in London over the last five years – and the decline shows no sign of slowing.

The birthrate is falling faster here than anywhere else in the country. London was also the only English region to see its population decline last year, according to recent Office for National Statistics figures. Outside the Covid pandemic, it was the first time London’s population had declined since the 1980s.

People’s decisions to leave or not have children in the capital are varied, but London’s affordability crisis is well known. On average, rent takes up around half of a worker’s income, while the housing ladder can feel impenetrable for first-time buyers. Coupled with soaring everyday costs, it’s no wonder many feel they cannot put down roots here.

Advertisement

Fewer children mean fewer pupils. For state schools, which are funded by government on a per-pupil basis, this can ultimately mean closures.

It’s easy to get lost in the numbers. But falling pupil numbers and school closures affect children, parents, staff and entire communities. I’ve seen how disorientating closures can be, leaving children and families feeling displaced and staff facing redundancy.

I’ve also seen the dedication of borough and school colleagues across London in supporting families and staff through these challenging experiences.

Advertisement

Local authorities have proved resourceful in using their existing powers to respond to falling pupil numbers.

For schools facing closure, mergers are often a solution and, with the right support, can help children integrate fully into their new school.

When St Mary’s CofE Primary School closed in Hackney last year, many pupils transferred to nearby St Matthias CofE Primary School. Before enrolling, St Mary’s children attended playtimes, lunchtimes and “meet the teacher” sessions at St Matthias, allowing friendships to form naturally. This phased transition was crucial to helping pupils and families adjust.

Falling pupil numbers have also left schools with empty classrooms and buildings. Boroughs are finding new uses for this space. In Hammersmith and Fulham, the council leased spare space to private and community organisations, generating more than £100,000 a year for one host school.

Advertisement

Rising demand for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provision means surplus space can also create opportunities. In Bexley, 122 new SEND places across nine local schools have been created, saving an estimated £8m by reducing reliance on costly out-of-area placements.

In Croydon, spare capacity now supports a unit helping asylum-seeking children settle into mainstream education.

These examples show what boroughs can achieve. But the closure process remains unnecessarily bureaucratic, unbalanced and opaque for families. Consultations for local-authority maintained schools can take up to six months, prolonging uncertainty. Conversely, families at academies are only notified once a closure decision has been made, leaving little opportunity to have their say.

London Councils, representing all London boroughs, is calling on the Department for Education to equalise the closure process across all school types, creating a more consistent, efficient and fairer system.

Advertisement

Councils should also have greater powers to decide how surplus school premises are used, avoiding unnecessary government approval delays and reducing the time buildings remain empty.

This is an opportunity for government to meaningfully deliver on its mission to rewire the state. Councils have the relationships and expertise to manage falling pupil numbers and resulting mergers or closures. Trusting them is central to what devolution can look like in practice.

Falling pupil numbers are here to stay. The response must be compassionate and collaborative, with children, parents and staff at its heart.

 

Advertisement

Una O’Halloran is the Labour leader of Islington Council and London Councils’ Executive Member for Children and Education 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Wings Over Scotland | Fear And Favour

Published

on

This is what it looks like, if you’ve ever wondered.

It’s the police’s own version of a seven-hour “no comment” interview.

Let’s just remind ourselves of that letter of 20 August, because it was a pretty significant and serious piece of professional correspondence to have been tossed away in three sentences.

To which the response of Police Scotland – a public service paid for by, and theoretically answerable to, the people of Scotland – is essentially “Meh, whatever”. The sheer lack of respect, the lazy contempt, not for Wings or even our lawyer but for the electorate who pay their wages, is frankly nauseating. They couldn’t even be bothered to deliver it within the 14 days.

Advertisement

The reply leaves pretty much no option but to go ahead with applying for the judicial review, which our legal team is now working on. It’s a complicated process of several stages but we’ll keep you posted as it develops. (We may need to call on you for some support, but that remains to be seen.)

The one thing that’s certain is that Scotland deserves better than this, and if nobody but us is going to act to make that happen, then so be it.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home Article | How civil society partnership can deliver the new government’s agenda

Published

on

How civil society partnership can deliver the new government's agenda
How civil society partnership can deliver the new government's agenda

Bonny Downs Community Association, in London, has been helping their local area since 1998

Jack Wakefield, Head of Policy

The government’s ambition to put more power in the hands of local communities will depend on the strength of civil society. Indeed, as Jack Wakefield, Head of Policy at Social Investment Business, shows, investment in civil society will be vital for the government to deliver its commitment to tackle the country’s most pressing challenges head on.

Advertisement

“We all have charities in our constituencies that are doing the most amazing work” said Andy Burnham as he set out the ‘Direction of Government’ during his first day in the Commons as Prime Minister. He continued, “My agenda is all about putting power in the hands of people at the community level, so that they can drive changes that are right for them.”

Civil society is critical in the shift towards greater local control and decision making in public services. Since entering office, ministers have rightly recognised that voluntary, community, faith, charity and social enterprise organisations (VCSEs) have the expertise, local knowledge and trusted relationships needed to tackle some of the country’s most pressing social challenges. As the government pursues devolution and greater public power, it is right that VCSEs are seen as central to these ambitions. They strengthen communities, foster belonging and provide vital neighbourhood services, often remaining when others have withdrawn.

Investing in the buildings from which these organisations operate is therefore critical to delivering the government’s ambitions. These community assets are essential infrastructure, yet many face high energy costs and poor energy efficiency. The Warm Homes Fund presents an opportunity to address this, helping community buildings become warmer, more efficient and more financially sustainable, strengthening the places and public services communities depend on.

Advertisement

Locally led change

The sector’s greatest strength lies in its deep roots within local communities. Government research found that more than 75 per cent of VCSE organisations deliver services in the communities where they are based, giving them an unrivalled understanding of local needs, and challenges. This close connection enables them to respond quickly, tailor services to local circumstances and engage people who might otherwise fall through the cracks of traditional provision.

As a result, VCSE organisations play a vital role in supporting some of the most vulnerable people in society. Across homelessness, employability, health and social care, disability support and countless other areas, they provide trusted services that are rooted in lived experience and long-standing community relationships.

Advertisement

Evidence clearly shows that investing in community organisations can generate significant returns for both society and the economy, too. Research by Social Investment Business on the Futurebuilders Fund found a clear relationship between investment in voluntary organisations and improved local outcomes. Areas receiving over £3 million of investment recorded Gross Value Added (GVA) levels 42 per cent higher than comparable areas without investment, while levels of deprivation improved by 12 per cent. Even smaller investments generated measurable benefits, with areas receiving more than £500,000 experiencing GVA growth 14 per cent higher than comparable communities.

These findings reinforce a simple but important principle: investment in civil society is not merely a social good, it is an investment in economic growth, prevention and resilience. Strong community organisations can help address problems early, reducing pressure on public services and limiting the need for more costly interventions later.

At the heart of communities

At the heart of this success are community buildings. Community centres, village halls, faith buildings, youth hubs and multi-purpose facilities provide the physical foundation from which civil society operates. Their value extends far beyond the activities they host. They act as neighbourhood anchors, bringing people together, creating a sense of place and providing some of the few genuinely accessible and inclusive spaces remaining in many communities. In many deprived areas, they are among the last shared civic spaces where residents can connect, access support and participate in community life.

Advertisement

Yet the long-term sustainability of community buildings is at risk. Research from Social Investment Business suggests that rising asset disposals from local authorities is associated with increased charity closures, and the rising pressure of energy costs and low energy efficiency is putting charity budgets under severe strain. Indeed, community spaces are some of the least efficient buildings in the country, with bills surging by 12 per cent since the start of the Iran war. When a community building closes, the consequences extend far beyond the loss of a physical asset. Services disappear, volunteers are lost, social connections weaken and residents can be left without vital sources of support.

Civil society is central to the government’s ambitions to end homelessness, improve outcomes empower local communities, and renew public services. To harness this potential fully, we must support not only the organisations themselves but also the infrastructure they depend on. Investing in them is therefore not an optional extra. It is a necessary condition for delivering stronger communities, more effective public services and sustainable local growth. The Warm Homes Fund provides an oven-ready route to strengthening the viability and sustainability of these buildings for the next generation.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House Article | A commitment to rejoin the EU would make Labour more electable

Published

on

A commitment to rejoin the EU would make Labour more electable
A commitment to rejoin the EU would make Labour more electable


3 min read

As Andy Burnham’s honeymoon summer draws to a close, Labour MPs are staring down the barrel of some truly perilous fiscal choices in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

As the hard deadline of the 28 October Budget approaches, despite a recent uptick in the opinion polls, the spectre of another fall in support cannot be ruled out.

Enter our latest research, which finds that a Labour manifesto commitment to full European Union membership would secure the most support from across the electoral coalition voters the Prime Minister must persuade to back him at the next general election.

The public have repeatedly made clear that they support far stronger ties with our closest allies and partners in the EU, on everything from trade to travel and defence, and will resoundingly reward parties who take the plunge.

This week, fresh polling by YouGov, commissioned by Best for Britain, and endorsed by former Labour leader, Lord Neil Kinnock, Burnham’s long-time mentor, and ex-European Commission vice president, both quantifies that support and makes the next step wholly unambiguous.

Advertisement

Committing to rejoining the EU in Labour’s next manifesto is vital for the party’s chances at the next general election.

Our research shows that it would significantly boost enthusiasm and inclination to vote for the party by a full 7 per cent across all voters in Great Britain (10K+ GB adults). British Future’s recent research added to the evidence base that the public wants the government to go beyond Keir Starmer’s ‘red lines’ on Europe. Our findings, based on clear data, take it further. It’s there in black and white – and red all over. 

There’s another reason that now is the time for bold action.

Advertisement

As Kinnock rightly highlights, “increasing numbers of people across Britain already know [this] to be the patriotic course”. On Monday, when the first ministers of the UK’s three devolved nations, including Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth, signed a memorandum at Cardiff Castle, including the powerful commitment that “the future of their nations belong in the European Union”, the son of Tredegar made the unifying case. The argument for repairing the unnecessary damage caused by Brexit, for every person across all four nations of the UK. Not only that, but for Labour to lead the way, as both “public opinion and world realities make this advance essential”. Hear, hear. 

What’s more, the irrefutable growth case has also been set out in an independent econometric study by Frontier Economics, demonstrating that restoring our membership of the world’s largest, and our nearest, trading bloc can deliver a £92bn boost to the UK’s GDP, at the barest minimum, concentrated in the former industrial and manufacturing heartlands Burnham’s roots lie so deeply within. This is a route that can no longer be avoided, overlooked, or ignored. 

The siren calls – from crypto-cash funded populism and identity-driven nationalism – are all too real. The risks of dwindling public consent following a Budget feeding frenzy, coupled with emptying arms stores and public services running on fumes, are equally so.

But with a fair wind, for once, behind them, and an open goal in front, Burnham’s team must recognise that a narrow window of opportunity exists. A natural, likeable ‘every bloke’ with the necessary deftness to carry the country through a course correction occupies the highest office in the land, and is winning hearts and minds. A clear and conclusive path forward does exist which addresses both the political and economic conundrums the PM is confronted with, and can begin to right the wrongs of the past decade.  

Advertisement

It requires only bravery to reap its rewards.

 

Tom Brufatto is Director of Policy and Research at Best for Britain

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Sydney Sweeney Advert Backlash Addressed By Olympian Amy Hunt Again

Published

on

Sydney Sweeney in her latest Novig ad campaign video

Olympian Amy Hunt has opened up about why she was so disappointed by Sydney Sweeney’s controversial new advert.

Speaking to the BBC after completing the Ultimate Championship over the weekend, the silver medallist said: “Sydney Sweeney, this is what women in sport look like.”

On Tuesday, she then addressed the matter on Good Morning Britain, claiming: “When we’re trying to provide role models for young people and young women in sport, we really want to show that it’s about what your body can do, not so much what it looks like.”

Advertisement
Sydney Sweeney in her latest Novig ad campaign video
Sydney Sweeney in her latest Novig ad campaign video

Amy continued: “When we see the stats [saying] 64% of young girls drop out of exercise and sport before they reach the age of 16, we don’t need to place any kind of barrier whatsoever in their way in terms of providing the opportunity and the empowerment for them to still exercise – whatever that looks like, professional, or kind of just going to do a ParkRun with your friends.

“So, it’s about empowering young girls and young women and young people to show that you really can just get out there and you don’t have to worry what you look like, you don’t have to worry about what you’re wearing.”

However, she added: “The reaction has almost outweighed the moment because the first thing I saw was all of the positive compilations of women in sport. It’s actually kind of moved. It’s separated itself from from the moment entirely.

“And it’s not anything personal against that actress. It’s more the kind of intention, and it’s just moved into a completely different spin now, where we’re able to kind of have all these different things celebrating women’s sport.”

In Sydney’s new ad, she’s seen posing nude, save for various bits of sporting equipment, while claiming: “Novig is just sports. So, they wanted to show… just sports.”

Although Sydney has not yet commented publicly on the backlash, she did appear to reference it in a string of Instagram story posts shared on Sunday night.

Advertisement

The Emmy nominee posted a string of nude photo-shoots participated in by leading sporting figures, including Serena Williams, Caroline Wozniacki, Megan Rapinoe, Rob Gronkowski, Karl-Anthony Towns and Jason Kelce.

HuffPost UK has contacted Sydney Sweeney and Novig for comment.

Of course, this is not the first time Sydney has landed herself at the centre of controversy over an advert.

Advertisement

Last year, she found herself in hot water over a very different ad campaign, when it was suggested that a promo video for American Eagle she’d appeared in had mirrored the language of white supremacists and eugenicists.

Sydney later said she had been left “surprised by the reaction” to the clothing advert, after spending months mostly swerving questions about the media storm, while the fashion brand insisted their promo clip had been “about the jeans” and nothing more.

“We’ll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their American Eagle jeans with confidence, their way,” they insisted. “Great jeans look good on everyone.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025