Politics
Zia Yusuf Takes Aim At ‘Deadbeat Tory Ministers’ In Swipe At Reform Colleagues
Zia Yusuf has attacked former “deadbeat Tory ministers” in what appears to be a swipe at his Reform UK colleagues.
The party’s home affairs spokesperson claimed a Conservative pact with Reform would only work “over my dead body” in a slap down to the rival right-wing party.
More than 20 former Tory MPs have defected to Reform since the Conservatives were kicked out of government in the 2024 general election.
Yusuf’s remarks revive the existing tensions within Reform between the former Conservatives who defected over to Nigel Farage’s party and those who have been part of the group since before it became a dominant force in mainstream politics.
Mimicking a popular social media format, Zusuf slammed an unnamed “deadbeat Tory minister” who “promised to cut immigration”, only to “throw open Britain’s borders and then “write articles constantly pleading for a ‘pact’ with Reform so you can try and suffocate us from within.”
He added: “OVER MY DEAD BODY!”
Yusuf is not an MP. But, of Reform’s eight representatives in the Commons, four used to be Tory MPs and two were ministers.
Suella Braverman, now Reform’s education spokesperson, was the home secretary under Rishi Sunak while Robert Jenrick, Reform’s Treasury spokesperson, was the immigration minister.
Many on social media suggested Yusuf was directing his criticism towards Jenrick and Braverman, who have tried to distance themselves from their past in government.
Yusuf has been frequently criticised for his outspoken social media takes in recent months.
He has been accused of racism after slamming a former child refugee and a Labour council leader because she was born in Somalia.
The prominent politician also called former Tory defence secretary Ben Wallace – who served in the Army – a “traitor” to the UK.
His remarks have drawn criticism from within his own party, including from Farage who previously said he would give Yusuf a “ticking off” for his “over the top” language.
Former Tory cabinet minister and now Reform member Nadine Dorries also told Times Radio earlier this month: “I think Zia’s got a problem with Twitter. Someone needs to take his phone off him.”
Reform is also grappling with heightened scrutiny over its finances after receiving £72 million in donations from crypto-billionaires last week.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Phillipson to Piddington Women Concerned About Their Safety: ‘All Women in Society Are Unsafe’
Phillipson to Piddington Women Concerned About Their Safety: ‘All Women in Society Are Unsafe’
Politics
Neurosurgeon Shares Simple Way To Improve Memory
“Where does the time go?” and “time goes by too quickly” are common refrains at the end of a weekend or calendar year.
While there is no way to actually slow down time, there may be a reason why it flies by so fast – and your strict weekly routine may be the culprit. Rigidity and a lack of novelty can actually make it feel like your life is going by faster than you want.
In a viral post on X, retired neurosurgeon Dr. Brian Hoeflinger shared insight on routine’s impact on the passage of time and ways to make it feel like it’s moving slower.
“Repetitive daily routines stop the brain from recording clear detailed memories,” Hoeflinger wrote on X. “When every day looks the same, your brain does not track time the same as a clock does. It tracks change. If nothing new happens then days, months, and years start to blur together.”
“This is known as time compression. When life lacks variety, your brain compresses past days together, making it feel like time is sped up,” he continued.
To make time feel like it’s passing more slowly – and like your days are not so mundane – you can simply try new things “or change up your routine,” Hoeflinger told HuffPost.
Novelty is the answer to “time compression”
According to Hoeflinger, the best way to disrupt time compression is by doing new things. This could be trying a new hobby, travelling to a bucket-list destination, taking a new route home or simply making a different recipe for dinner.
“You’ve got to change things up in your life a little bit … so it’ll stick in your brain and be put into your permanent memory,” he said.
When you do something different, “it makes an incident in your brain, so you remember it. And by remembering that, it helps you feel like your day was longer, like there was more going on in your day,” Hoeflinger said.
Think about it: When you look back on a year with lots of events and travel, you probably say something like “wow, I did so much” versus a year of nothing where the days melt into each other.
It may sound counterintuitive since days that involve more activity tend to fly by in the moment, but these days seem slower when you look back because your brain makes a note of each of the occurrences, Hoeflinger explained.
Compare this to when you do the same things again and again. There is no individual memory that sticks out, which makes it feel like the day went by and you weren’t even in it.
“When you experience something new … your brain responds with a release of dopamine, and that can help us focus in and pay more attention to the experience that we’re having,” added Tim Bono, a lecturer in psychological and brain sciences at Washington University in St. Louis. “So, you can think of novelty [as] interrupting the daily schema or expectation of life.”
You’ll also have more memories of your life if you take an active role in it, Hoeflinger said. “The day will feel slower and more meaningful as opposed to if you’re not actively doing new things.”
Bono said, “We can’t change the actual passage of time. The days and months are going to go by … but we do have some agency and control over the depth and meaning of the experiences of how that time feels to us, especially when we were looking back.”
You don’t need to do anything drastic to infuse more novelty into your days
The first step to creating more memories and slowing down the passage of time is to simply break up your routine.
“Try to do something different – go to a different restaurant or try new meals at home … change up your wardrobe instead of dressing the same,” Hoeflinger suggested.
Any amount of novelty will create new memories and make your days feel longer and more action-packed, even if that new memory is simply joining a different gym class or working from a coffee shop instead of your home office.
“I think that the most important way to increase our happiness is to savor whatever time we do have,” Bono said.

Maki Nakamura via Getty Images
Instead of sticking to your weekly routine of errands, chores and work, be sure to add in time with family and friends.
“That’s the kind of novelty that allows you to slow down and savor life versus feeling like you’re on this treadmill and that you’re just constantly having to run from one thing to the next,” Bono said. “Those are usually the mundane things that we’re chasing.”
“We have to give ourselves permission to … get a little bit behind on those, so that we can prioritize the stuff that’s more important. And I would put social connection and social experiences at the top of that list,” Bono added.
This may look like making happy hour plans with a co-worker instead of immediately rushing home or inviting your cousin and their kids over for dinner and a playdate.
Mindfulness and relaxation can also help slow time.
Focusing on the moment in front of you is an important way to savor time, too. This is true whether you are trying something new or not.
It isn’t easy. Many of us are on our phones while watching TV or thinking about a long to-do list as we play with our kids and grandkids – “but I think if you find that you focus on that moment more … that’ll form a memory in your mind that will stick with you more, and it’ll make your day more meaningful,” Hoeflinger said.
Focusing on a moment allows your brain to create an incident in your day, which then makes your day feel longer and like you accomplished something, he said.
This type of focus is a form of mindfulness, which allows you to slow down and home in on what’s happening now.
Along those same lines is relaxation. If you are always rushing around, the day flies by, Hoeflinger said. “So, slow down.”
Switching up your routine and trying new things helps it feel like you have more time in a very finite life, and it also helps you live a more enjoyable life.
“Just do something exciting or something different,” Hoeflinger stressed. “That all helps you feel like time’s not slipping by so fast because those incidents, those memories, will stick in your mind. And when you look back upon it, you’ll go, ‘Wow, that was a great day.’”
“I heard some quote a long time ago – ‘the biggest lie we can tell ourselves is that we’ll always have more time,’” said Bono.
The reality is we don’t always have more time. You likely think you can visit that new restaurant next month (and then never go) or you can see that friend in the winter instead of the fall (and then never do that, either). “Being reminded that time is a scarce resource, as uncomfortable as that might feel, is actually good for our mental health,” Bono said.
This helps inspire people to get out and do the thing they’ve been putting off.
“Being reminded of that reminds us that life is precious, and there’s no time like the present to seize the opportunities to reach out and have those meaningful experiences in our lives,” said Bono.
Politics
Are Potatoes Healthy? Nutrition Experts Reveal The Benefits
Potatoes have had a rough go of things.
Most recently, the high-protein, anti-carbohydrate people have spread the message that potatoes are full of fattening carbs. Back in the anti-fat ’80s, we were told that mashed or fried potatoes were too rich, guaranteed to pack on the pounds. Before that, there were the anti-nightshade adherents, who believed that potatoes were laced with poisons.
In the United States, where a 5-pound bag of potatoes was in every pantry when I was a kid, we are eating fewer spuds these days. U.S. annual consumption of fresh potatoes fell from 48 pounds per person in 1982 to 28 pounds per person in 2024, while frozen potato consumption rose from 41 pounds to 58 pounds per person over the same period, respectively.
That means we aren’t cooking with potatoes, but we’re eating a whole lot of French fries and tater tots. Here’s how nutritionists want us to start thinking about potatoes in our everyday diets.
Potatoes are a whole food
Like other vegetables, potatoes have a spectrum of nutrients, not just carbohydrates.
According to Toby Smithson, a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) and the senior manager of Nutrition and Wellness at the American Diabetes Association, “they are a rich source of vitamin C, vitamin B6, potassium and fiber, especially when the skin is left on. Potassium is particularly important for heart health and healthy blood pressure”. In fact, potatoes are a potassium superstar and even have some protein.

“Potatoes rank highest in potassium of the top-selling fruits and vegetables. Potatoes are delicious and a good quality carb – that even offers a little bit of plant protein too (3 grams per serving),” Barbara Ruhs, a registered dietitian (RD), said.
Yes, they are called a starch for a reason
It’s true that potatoes contain carbohydrates. You may have heard of the Glycemic Index, a scale devised to help diabetic patients manage their carbohydrate intake. It rates foods on a scale of 0 to 100 based on how quickly the foods break down and raise your blood sugar after eating them. In recent years, the glycemic ratings of certain foods have entered the lexicon of weight loss, as people strive to lower their sugar intake.
The highest-GI potato is a plain baked Russet potato, scoring at 111. A boiled white potato scores 82, a boiled New Potato is 58, and French fries 73. Russets have more of a starch called amylopectin, which digests quickly, while waxy potatoes have more amylose, which burns more slowly. New potatoes have the most amylose and, when eaten with the skins on, are the lowest GI. But GI is just part of the picture.
Potato salad, on the other hand, has a GI of 45, which is low. How does that work? There are two important factors in how a potato affects your blood sugar. One is the way it is cooked, and the other is what you eat with it.
How you cook them matters
The same potato, which has a GI of 82 when cooked and refrigerated overnight, now has a GI of 49. That’s because of the phenomenon of resistant starch.
“The flesh contains resistant starch that increases in content when potatoes are cooked and cooled and actually works to blunt the glycemic effect of potatoes, meaning your blood sugar levels are lower than if eating hot potatoes,” Carolyn O’Neil, RDN, said.
The resistant starch remains even when you reheat a chilled, boiled potato, so cooking your potatoes the day before and then reheating them lowers their GI, even if you sauté them for breakfast.
Most foods are eaten in a dish, as part of a meal. That high-GI baked potato is usually topped with butter, sour cream or cheese. Adding cheese to that high-GI Russet potato brings the GI down to 39, which is considered low. Making that boiled and chilled potato into potato salad, with added acids, fat and fiber, drops the GI to 45.
“Who knew that potato salad was the way to go?” O’Neill said. “Turns out that by adding acid and fat to the cooled potatoes you can blunt the glycemic response even further.”
Even diabetics can enjoy potatoes
The people who really need to monitor their blood sugar are diabetics, and experts still recommend potatoes as part of the diabetic diet.
“Potatoes are often misunderstood when it comes to diabetes, but they can be part of a healthy eating pattern,” Smithson said.
“Potatoes are a quality carbohydrate and fit into the carbohydrate portion of the Diabetes Plate, where about one-quarter of the plate is filled with carbohydrate foods and the remainder includes non-starchy vegetables and lean protein.”
How many of the nutrients are in the skins?
You’ve probably heard that all the nutrients are in the skin of the potato, especially the fibre. The flesh may seem creamy, but it also has its share of cholesterol-lowering fibre, too.
A medium Russet potato has 3-4 grams total dietary fibre, and “30-50% is in the peel, 50-70% is in the flesh,” O’Neil said.
The dietary fibre in the skin is primarily insoluble or indigestible fibre “that works like ‘nature’s broom’ to support gut motility,” and “the flesh of the potato contains soluble fibres, like the type in oatmeal, that slows down glucose absorption and helps manage cholesterol levels,” she added.
Why you don’t need to avoid carbs
While the rest of us are trimming carbs, endurance athletes are carrying packets of carbohydrate gels to slurp down during long runs or bike races. A 2019 study showed that Russet potatoes are as effective as packaged carbohydrate gels for fueling endurance athletes. The trend of carrying a baked potato along while training continues to this day.
The overall takeaway? If you’re concerned about carbs, boil, chill and then eat your potatoes. Lean toward new potatoes when appropriate, and make sure to enjoy them with some fat and acid to counter the blood sugar boost.
Politics
Burnham Urged To ‘Stand Up’ To Trump Or Risk Being ‘Rolled Over’
Andy Burnham has been urged to “stand up” to Donald Trump ahead of his first face-to-face with the US president next week.
World leaders will gather at the United Nations’ General Assembly in New York – and there’s growing anticipation for how the UK prime minister will deal with the mercurial American leader.
Burnham previously criticised Trump when he was the mayor of Greater Manchester, insisting the divisive figure would not be welcome in his city due to his “poisonous politics”.
But the PM seems much keener on maintaining the UK-US special relationship since getting into No.10.
In August, Burnham said: “I’ve had a habit of saying what I feel over the years, and I’ll continue to do that. But, at the same time, I am somebody who works with people, tries to find common ground.”
However, Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey told Sky News over the weekend that the prime minister should stand up to Trump, whom he describes as a “destructive demagogue”.
“If you look at how he’s behaved, he has even got worse. The Iran war is hurting America, hurting our country, hurting the whole world. This has been a disaster,” Davey said.
“And the problem with Mr Trump is unless you stand up to him, he rolls you over.”
He said Canadian prime minister Mark Carney – who is currently locked in a trade war with Trump – was a good example for Burnham to follow.
“He [Trump] may not like being called out, but he has to be called out,” Davey said.
However, equalities minister Bridget Phillipson suggested that was not the route Burnham was going to go down, telling Sky News that “politics is about being pragmatic”.
When reminded of Burnham’s past attacks on Trump, she said: “Look, I think what you’ve just described there is politics.
“The president knows that, this is… far from unique.
“And people will express views at different points on different topics. And that’s no bar to having a strong relationship.”
Phillipson continued: “Politics is also about being pragmatic, and it’s also about being rooted in what’s best for the country.
“And what is best for our country is having a relationship with the US where we can engage in that defence intelligence sharing, where we can have a strong relationship on lots and lots of areas, whether that’s on the economy as well.
“Does that mean we always agree on everything? No. Again, that’s what I mean about it being politics.”
Despite belittling the ex-Manchester mayor by describing him as a “liberal” and a “mayor of a town” before he became prime minster, Trump has not yet publicly criticised Burnham’s premiership.
Burnham has already spoken to Trump over the phone at least twice – once shortly after he was sworn into office and another time when announcing his plan to sanction Israeli settlers in the West Bank.
Trump remained surprisingly silent over the PM’s plan to punish the US ally over its treatment of Palestinians.
It’s a harmonious start to their relationship and a stark contrast to the way the president publicly slammed Keir Starmer during his final months in office.
Trump said the then-PM was “no Winston Churchill” after he refused to get directly involved in the Iran war.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
6 Habits Mega Readers Build To Finish At Least 1 Book A Week
You probably already know that reading is pretty good for us. It’s been linked to better mental health, more empathy, a lower risk of dementia, and even increased longevity.
There’s only one problem: a lot of us can’t find it in us to do it.
Earlier this year, the National Literacy Trust found a 36% decrease in reading for pleasure among teens compared to 2005 figures. Over a third of UK adults say they’ve given up reading as a hobby.
In 2025, meanwhile, a YouGov poll found that 40% of Britons hadn’t read or listened to a single book in the last year.
But what about people on the other side of that spectrum? After all, that same YouGov poll found a not-insignificant portion (4%) of “mega-readers”, who tear through 50 volumes or more a year. That’s roughly a book a week.
Here’s what we know about the people who reach that bar or even exceed it:
1) They may be more comfortable giving up on books they don’t like
Super-reader Tyler Cowen, who claims to have gone through multiple books a night, previously said that if you’re not feling transported by your current options, “Just stop reading, put them down”.
Online, readers have described the practice of “DNF-ing” a book (DNF stands for “did not finish”). Many say this helped get them out of a reading slump – personally, I went from reading one book a month to six with the method.
In case you need any more convincing, only books which “emotionally transport” readers into their fictional worlds seemed to improve readers’ empathy scores in one study, while trudging through pages they hated temporarily lowered them.
2) They don’t put too much pressure on themselves early on
Literary Hub writer Kelsey Rexroat interviewed “super-readers” who finished 100 books or more a year.
She noted that most of them weren’t bookworms as kids, and many began with a “modest” daily target. And Chasity Moreno, a worker in the New York Public Library’s Reader Services department, agreed, telling TIME: “You don’t have to be like, ‘I’m going to read War and Peace’”.
This is how I broke my screen addiction and fell back in love with reading. I started with a 10-page-a-night goal, which I still sometimes rely on when I’m a bit stuck.
3) They track their progress more often
Podcast host Anne Bogel, who also runs the Modern Mr D’Arcy blog and says she reads hundreds of books a year, told TIME that she’s a “big believer in tracking one’s books – it really does help develop a more satisfying reading life”.
A Redditor agreed: “I love seeing the progress and it’s personally quite motivating to see how many books I read in a month,” they wrote.
We know that regularly monitoring how close you are to your goal is linked to greater odds of success – perhaps this approach works for reading, too.
4) They create clusters of interests
Last year, I worked my way through every Jane Austen novel, as well as her juvenilia. Rather than making me feel stuck, the restriction proved really useful: I knew I was going to like the style, which helped me stick to the list.
Tyler Cowen said he sometimes likes to read in “clusters”, i.e. books on the same topic.
Sunday Times data journalist, Tom Calver, who made good on his resolution to read 52 books in one year, found success with the trick, too.
5) They’re always packing pages
It sounds obvious, but having a book on you all or most of the time really can help.
Cowen said reading “anywhere” – from bed to the bus – helped him reach his goal of about a book a week.
Frederick J. Goodall, who read 614 books in 2025, told Literary Hub: “I kept a book with me wherever I go.
“If I have to pick up the kids from school, I read a book while I’m waiting in the car line. If I have to take my mom to the doctor, I read a book then.”
6) They could be more aware of the links between sounds and written words
A 2024 study found that the best readers tended to have larger sections of the parts of the brain linked to categorising and associating different pieces of information, as well as a thicker Heschl’s gyrus, which hosts the auditory cortex.
Study author Prof Mikael Roll said this link might not be as unlikely as it sounds.
“To pair letters with speech sounds, we first need to be aware of the sounds of the language. This phonological awareness is a well-established precursor to children’s reading development,” he told The Conversation.
Politics
The House | Angus MacDonald: “If You’re Active In Faith, You’re More Likely To Have A Moral Compass”

11 min read
Entrepreneur, papal knight and now Liberal Democrat backbencher Angus MacDonald tells Sienna Rodgers about his colourful life and why Westminster needs more business brains
Angus MacDonald is described as a “rare politician” by a colleague who compares him, approvingly, to a red squirrel.
Papal knight, self-described Gladstonian liberal, Sandhurst graduate – it might be easy to cast the 63-year-old as an anachronistic holdout against the grey tide of modernity in his Highland fastness. But MacDonald is also a highly successful entrepreneur, a multi-millionaire who has set up and sold a string of businesses and brings to Parliament a sharp eye for the market.
He confesses he was shocked by how many MPs end up at Westminster after a career within the state’s fold, untroubled by the bottom line when he beat the SNP to represent Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire, part of which was once Charles Kennedy’s patch.
While expressing relief that Ed Davey has “stopped the stunts” (although this is contradicted by the leader in his own House interview), MacDonald is not especially critical of his party’s figurehead. He does, however, think the Liberal Democrats need to expand their offer.
“We need to broaden our range. Everybody knows we’re the party of health and social care, but I think we need to be the party of small business, and the party of education. If we had a three-legged stool, we would be a real contender to be a party in power.”
“But my opinion is to be taken lightly because I don’t have a clue what I’m talking about,” he adds, in what The House comes to recognise is typical playful – and disarming – self-effacement.
MacDonald, it is fair to say, is full of surprises, cheerfully admitting for example that he is a former donor to the Conservatives and Labour. The MP says this was in aid of resisting Scottish independence, though his attraction to the Conservatives went deeper than that.
“My father was a Conservative. But Boris Johnson and Liz Truss knocked any affection for the Conservative Party I might have had,” he says. Could that change again one day, if the Tories were to move back to the centre? “I would say I was a compassionate capitalist, and I don’t think the Conservatives have that compassion.”
So, what does MacDonald want to achieve in politics? His answer is immediate and comes with a printed copy of a report he has just written, titled Remote Scotland: Spiralling Towards Unviability?.
“Those living in remote Scotland face an unparalleled, difficult challenge of almost survival,” he explains. “Costs are 30 per cent higher. Incomes are 10 per cent lower. Public services are much less good, and the stopping of EU structural funds has been catastrophic. We are now generating the electricity needed for Great Britain from the Highlands, but it is offering minimal jobs, no legacy housing and almost no community benefit.”
High housing, energy and food costs, health and social care deserts, a lack of childcare, poor transport and digital connectivity are all analysed and assessed as “serious” or “critical” in his paper, complete with constituent testimonies. Current government policy, MacDonald argues, simply does not cater for this area as one of Europe’s most sparsely populated regions. The demographic crisis is particularly acute here and getting worse.
“I would say the West Highlands has the most severe demographic problem of the whole United Kingdom. Many of the schools have half the school roll they had 20 years ago.
Obviously, people are having less children, but we have young, dynamic families leaving the area because of the education offering and the fact you get paid less and the costs are higher.”
Does he have any thoughts on the challenge of explaining our declining birth rates? “As you’ve discovered, I’m not very bright,” he replies, “so I never have the next thought.” He suspects social media is a key culprit.
MacDonald is especially interested in economic policy, for example lobbying to raise the VAT registration threshold for small businesses, though admits he has not got very far with this.
“I would say what’s most shocked me is the complete lack of business knowledge and interest throughout the whole of Parliament, and that the people who are coming into Parliament are very often people who have been in the public sector, or charities, or consultancy, or have been just in politics,” he complains.
“I’m very frustrated because I go around seeing everybody about my policies and nobody’s interested.”
What is perhaps more attention-grabbing about MacDonald’s politics is his approach to cultural issues. On the face of it, one might call him a social conservative, though he prefers to characterise himself as a Gladstonian liberal. He is also, notably, a Catholic – to the extent he has been awarded a papal knighthood, for service to the church – which must have informed his opposition to assisted dying.
“I think 11 of the 72 Lib Dems voted against assisted dying.” (It was 11 at Second Reading and 15 at Third.) “I hope there’ll be more than that next time round. Politically, it’s enormously useful for me – my voters are thrilled with my moral stance,” he says.
While some advocates of Kim Leadbeater’s assisted dying bill were critical of those who objected on the basis of faith, others pointed out that we all get our moral compass from somewhere.
“I suppose I get guidance on a belief that politicians should have a moral compass, and I think if you’re active in faith, you’re more likely to have a moral compass. That’s going to rile a few people up,” MacDonald smiles.
He has certainly angered some Lib Dem members online with his dissent on trans issues, having made clear he rejects self-identification on gender and is concerned by the puberty blockers trial.
“I have had absolutely no pushback on my beliefs from anybody,” he says, referring to Lib Dem MPs, “even though I know that three or four of them are 180 degrees opposite of all my views.”
“The great thing about liberalism is it’s quite a broad church. The fact is, I’ll vote against the whip on things I care about. I made it very clear when I joined that I wouldn’t be whipped on moral issues,” he adds.
London-born MacDonald was raised in a famous Highlands climbers’ pub, Clachaig Inn, which his parents ran. “It was a great place to grow up,” he recalls. “It was back in the days when pubs were very vibrant places, so we would sometimes have 300 people in the bar. For a rural pub, it was humming.”
He started serving pints aged 10, he says. And drinking them? “Surreptitiously or legally?” the MP replies. He cannot remember but does confess to “minesweeping” – finishing abandoned drinks.
“I’m very frustrated because I go around seeing everybody about my policies and nobody’s interested”
His parents met in New York, where his father was working in the whisky industry, before his American mother was brought back to the Highlands – a “huge shock” given the wet weather and isolation. “She lasted 30 years, which is 29 and a half years longer than anybody thought it would last,” before going back to the States.
“I went to a Catholic boarding school down south in order to get some discipline knocked into me, and then my parents ran out of money, so they moved us to a day school in Edinburgh, Edinburgh Academy,” says the MP, enthusiastically tucking into his ice cream (it is a hot day in Westminster – though apparently, he eats it every day of the year).
“But a) I didn’t do well academically, and b) I met a girl, and I pursued her to Uruguay. She was Uruguayan, but she was doing a one-year exchange in Scotland. I thought, ‘She’s the one for me.’”
Leaving aged just 16, he spent a year in South America – until her family “made it clear that I should move on”. In the meantime, his entrepreneurial ways had begun: via a bus venture for tourists headed for Machu Picchu in Peru, he made “a fair bit of money”.
“I came back on the QE2, the liner. My father met me in Southampton, and he said, ‘It’s the army for you, laddie.’ I went to Sandhurst, extraordinarily, then did a short service commission, which was the making of me.”
MacDonald repeatedly emphasises just how lacking he was in academic ability – a surprise to him, given his father was an Oxford scholar. “He’s brilliantly intelligent. He was never a money-maker. He couldn’t quite understand why his children were not academic, and I don’t know the answer. But I’ve had many MBAs and PhDs work for me, and I seem to have been able to hold my own.”
So, off the young MacDonald went to the Falklands, post-ceasefire (“similar to the Highlands: very remote, tens of thousands of acres of barren land, very strong winds – I don’t remember being unhappy there at all”), then Northern Ireland. He was 18; the youngest in his platoon of 30.
“You grow up very quickly. You have to gain respect; you have to earn respect. It doesn’t come with the job. I think it was a good lesson in hard work, humility, working well with people, getting results without shouting. It’s a very consensual relationship between the officer, the sergeant and the men.”
MacDonald soon left the army – again, to pursue romance, having met his now-wife in Northern Ireland.
“I had already decided that the girl I was with was the one for me. She actually decided I was not. There’s a bit of a theme coming here! She did end up marrying me, but it took quite a while.
“I always knew that the army – it’s a difficult family life. You’re away from home a great deal, and you live in poor-quality housing, in a part of the world where your family don’t necessarily want to be. Also, I knew I wanted to go and work in the Alps as a ski guide,” he says.
“I did that for a winter and met a chap in a chairlift who offered me a job in finance. Obviously, you just keep going round until they offer you a job and can’t get off.”
The role kindled in him a love of business. Since then, MacDonald has founded multiple companies – including a data product for investment managers, a newspaper and a recycling firm – and sold them for a cumulative £150m.
MacDonald’s sons Archie, Jack and Jamie have followed the same entrepreneurial path (soap, kombucha and the family business of supplying spare parts for wind turbines, respectively). A fourth son, Donald, is the exception; he is “one of the Neets”, struggling to work in finance after gaining a 2.1 in theology at Edinburgh, so has just requalified.
“Hopefully, he’ll get a job now. But the big alarm to me is so many of our kids are studying a subject which will not help them get jobs in Britain, and I think we have to wake up and smell the bacon,” says MacDonald. Did he advise Donald against reading theology? “I’ve always made it clear to him that he’s mad for studying that.”
The MP is most proud of his philanthropic projects. In the 90s, he created the ‘Caledonian Challenge’, a 54-mile sponsored walk from Fort William to Loch Lomond that raised £14m over 20 years, for which he was awarded an OBE.
More recently, he read an article about how to transform a market town and spotted an opportunity to enhance Fort William, which struggles despite being a tourist centre (mostly a draw for hikers; also for Harry Potter fans who want to visit the nearby Glenfinnan Viaduct, which carries the Hogwarts Express in the films).
It recommended a town centre cinema with a restaurant – so, that is precisely what MacDonald created. He bought the old town hall, put a 100-seat restaurant and two-screen cinema in it, and parked a red Lotus sports car inside for good measure. It is now award-winning and owned by the community.
As an MP in the Highlands, MacDonald has a difficult schedule. He leaves home on a Sunday afternoon to catch the sleeper train down for parliamentary business starting a day later, often can only make it home for one night a week, and travels up to four hours to work at the far end of his constituency even when he is there. “I wouldn’t say my wife is a fan.”
Despite this, and his reflection that “in retrospect, I would’ve been very happy to be an MSP”, he is happy with the decision to take a seat in Westminster.
“Quite a lot of my friends are 65 and bored and not contributing and not fulfilled. They haven’t helped other people. They’ve done well, clipped the coupon and not benefited,” he says.
“I believe very strongly that if you’ve been lucky in life, you should give back. It would have been easy for me to continue my life of comfort in the Highlands of Scotland, writing novels and enjoying the social buzz, but I don’t think that is me.
“Although I find the commitment to Westminster a real challenge, I enjoy it a great deal, and do feel that people who can make change should do it rather than take the easy option.”
Politics
Farm-state Republicans are having a cow over Trump's beef imports as Election Day approaches
Farm-state Republicans don’t support President Donald Trump’s move to import cheap beef — but they’re still getting grilled for it.
Trump’s plan to combat sky-high beef prices by introducing discounted, tariff-free foreign beef has been widely condemned by ag-state Republicans who are concerned it will undercut the domestic beef industry and hurt ranchers, a normally reliable constituency.
And their opponents see an opening to paint Republicans as unconcerned about voters’ pocketbook concerns.
“Our ranchers and our farmers keep getting kicked in the teeth, and we have politicians that keep telling us that everything’s great, that we’re the hottest country,” Dan Osborn, an independent running for Senate in Nebraska, said in an interview. “And to be quite frank, I’m pretty pissed off about it.”
Osborn’s state is one of the top four top cattle-producing states — along with Texas, Kansas and Iowa — all of which have more-competitive-than-expected Senate races this cycle. And Trump’s controversial plan to remove tariffs from 300,000 metric tons of imported beef, sold at 25 percent below current market prices, is doing Republicans no favors.
Osborn’s campaign went on air with a pun-filled ad this week in which he says the import plan is “selling out American farmers and ranchers,” and blasts Congress for being “too chicken to stand up to the corporations who bought them off.” The campaign says it plans to spend at least six figures airing the spot. It’s the first major spending from a campaign focused on the beef import plan. But it plays into a larger economic argument Democrats are pushing to break through with farmers and ranchers: Trump and Republicans have turned their backs on rural America, as a worsening farm crisis and spiking fuel and fertilizer prices pinch agricultural communities.
“It’s part of a wider frustration,” said an adviser to one of the farm-state GOP senators, granted anonymity to speak openly. “I don’t think it sways anyone’s vote, but it isn’t a great look. … It isn’t fun for me to read the headline. It’s frustrating.”
Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), Osborn’s opponent, said in a statement he has a record of standing for his state’s agriculture community, “no matter who is president — from fighting Biden’s 30×30 plan to opposing this beef import plan.”
“Ranchers know the difference between a senator who delivers and a candidate reading a script his socialist ad agency wrote,” Ricketts said.
Farm-state Democrats and independents believe beef imports provide a window to speak to rural voters who have skewed red for decades but suddenly look more competitive amid Trump’s plunging political standing. A strategist working on Osborn’s campaign, granted anonymity to discuss strategy, said Osborn’s ad “codes as non-partisan in a way that running ads about taxes or healthcare doesn’t.”
Trump’s overall unpopularity is hurting Republicans across the map, but this policy could be especially problematic in a quartet of once-sleeper Senate races that could hand Democrats control of the upper chamber.
Spokespeople for the GOP nominees in Iowa and Kansas declined to discuss the issue, pointing to their candidates’ statements in August, when Trump’s plan was announced: Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa) called Trump’s plan a “bad idea,” while Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) said the priority should be growing the U.S. cattle herd, “not flooding the market with imports.”
Last week, during a debate at the Kansas State Fair, Democratic nominee Adam Hamilton slammed the import plan as “a slap in the face of all of our cattle ranchers,” earning a raucous response from fair-goers, and hit Marshall for “tepidly respond[ing] to it as opposed to shouting like hell that this is not okay.”
In Iowa’s agriculture-heavy first district, Democrats have been on the air since June with an ad hammering Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks for record-high beef prices” and other cost-of-living increases under the Trump administration. The Republicans who were already getting hammered for high prices before now are now hobbled by a proposed remedy — one that has infuriated their own base.
When asked how Republicans should message the beef plan back home, Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.), chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee, acknowledged there’s “certainly a lot of concern amongst our cattle producers.”
“I think they understand what’s going on. They’re just not pleased with it,” Boozman said. “We’re in contact with the administration, a lot of members are in contact, helping them understand the unintended consequences of it. We’d like to lower prices, but again, we don’t want the unintended consequence of lowering cattle futures significantly.”
That leaves ranchers worried that the import plan will undercut their struggling industry.
“President Trump wants to lower the price of beef, I think that’s where it’s coming from,” said Ben Menges, a cattle rancher in Arizona’s battleground 6th District. “The best way that President Trump can do that is by lowering the cost of fuel, not by importing a bunch of beef.”
Some Republicans have looked to turn the conversation into a culture war issue — hitting their opponents for past stances on meat consumption or veganism.
Vice President JD Vance, during a visit to Iowa Friday — which Hinson did not attend — slammed Hamilton, the pastor-turned-Democratic nominee for Senate in Kansas, for having a “kind of a ‘gee whiz, I’m a nice pastor’ vibe” who tells his congregation to “repent for their white privilege while eating beef.”
It’s an attack Marshall made at last week’s debate, hitting Hamilton for a sermon he delivered on climate change and the impact of meat consumption.
“I think the senator needs to repent for not standing up for the beef industry,” responded Hamilton.
Politics
The challenge of Islam to British society
And in 2024, there was the case of the Michaela Community School in London, a high-achieving secular school led by high-profile headteacher Katherine Birbalsingh. The school banned prayer rituals in the playground, after some Muslim pupils were pressuring others to participate. This resulted in a Muslim-led campaign against the school, featuring multiple threats to staff and a brick thrown through a teacher’s window. Fortunately, the school won the subsequent legal case, but on specific grounds that may not apply to other schools.
Islam is posing a challenge to law and order. In the year ending March 2025, the police recorded 2,949 ‘honour-based’ offences, including female genital mutilation, forced marriage and psychological, physical and emotional abuse. That’s an average of eight offences per day, and many more are undoubtedly unrecorded. Less than three per cent of these crimes were successfully prosecuted, leading police to be accused of turning a blind eye to these kinds of offences.
Prisons in particular are proving a breeding ground for Islamic extremism. Muslims are disproportionately represented, at 18 per cent of the prison population. A government report from 2016 found that prison imams are routinely distributing extremist literature among prisoners. There are also reports of prisoner-run ‘Sharia courts’ operating inside, carrying out various types of corporal punishment. Furthermore, the latest statistics show that 20 per cent of Muslim prisoners are white, compared with 7.8 per cent of Britain’s general Muslim population. This indicates the extent of Islamic conversions among the prison population. The net result is that prisoners leave prison more radicalised than when they went in, with many converting to Islam in prison.
This brings us to the threat of violent jihadism. In 2020, the Telegraph reported that 90 per cent of MI5’s 43,000-person terror watchlist were classed as jihadists. The government’s most recent report on countering terrorism from 2023 makes clear that the primary domestic terrorist threat comes from Islamist terrorism, which accounts for approximately 67 per cent of attacks since 2018, and around 75 per cent of MI5’s caseload. The current terrorism threat level was upgraded earlier this year to ‘severe’, meaning that an attack is highly likely.
At the same time, those tasked with protecting British citizens appear to be losing sight of the threat. In 2024, it emerged that police were being educated about ‘Islamophobia’ by radical campaign group MEND, which has defended jihadists and led prayers for ‘Palestinian victory’ in Israel. In a separate incident that same year, the Metropolitan Police were forced to cut ties with an adviser, Mohammed Kozbar, chairman of the Finsbury Park Mosque, after it emerged that he had ‘liked’ a post on X from the head of proscribed extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir and had praised Hamas’s founder as ‘the master martyr of the resistance’. There are real concerns about infiltration into mainstream and government-linked organisations by Muslims with radical sympathies.
Then there’s the presence of Sharia law in the UK. It has been estimated that there are over 85 Sharia courts operating in the UK. This has created a de facto parallel legal system for people in some communities. Women, in particular, may face tremendous family pressure to use Sharia courts, and may lack both the necessary English-language skills and a proper understanding of their rights under British law to otherwise enjoy the protections that would be afforded them through the English court system. Dutch political scientist Machteld Zee has exposed how many of those promoting the operation of Sharia councils in the UK are actually fundamentalists who want to turn the UK into an Islamic state, imposing Sharia law on all citizens.
Sharia law is inherently discriminatory against both women and non-Muslims. In these courts, a woman’s voice counts half as much as a man’s voice. Some Sharia court judges have argued for child marriage, or say that ‘a husband should not be questioned why he hit is wife’.
Among Western societies, Britain seems particularly receptive to Sharia law. In 2014, it became the first non-Islamic country to issue a sovereign Sharia bond. There are now nine banks offering Sharia-compliant products in the UK. In 2014, a government report stated that these had over 100,000 retail customers. The UK seems committed to London becoming a centre for Islamic finance.
It’s clear that Islam poses a profound challenge that requires bold and courageous responses from British society, from faithful Christians to secular-minded citizens. In my book, The Challenge of Islam, and in this essay, I have sought to highlight the role and influence that Islam now has in the UK. We need to understand the challenge of Islam and work out how to respond. At its root, this is a battle for the soul of the nation. A battle for tolerance and integration against the sectarian forces of intolerance and segregation. And it is a battle we cannot afford to lose.
This is an edited extract from The Challenge of Islam, published by Wilberforce Publications.
Tim Dieppe is a writer and head of public policy at Christian Concern.
Politics
Rory Stewart’s grooming-gangs howler – spiked
An interview conducted by Spectator editor Michael Gove with Rory Stewart on the magazine’s Quite Right! podcast this week has roused a good deal of understandable anger online.
The fury focussed on a specific soundbite, shared by the Spectator’s social-media accounts. In this filleted passage, Stewart appears to dismiss the grooming-gangs scandal as a red herring. At the very least, he minimises its importance next to matters of more urgency – a coordinated response to AI, for instance, and the country’s strategy for the coming third industrial revolution. Predictably enough, he could not resist the temptation to link the white heat emanating from this furnace of supposedly misdirected public opinion with the stoker-in-chief, as far as the left are concerned, Elon Musk.
Anyone listening to the whole thing will probably find more to agree with than they expect. Stewart states baldly that all illegal immigration is unacceptable, and that bogus asylum claims must be sternly rejected outright, and the claimants returned to France. On legal immigration, he denounces Boris Johnson in the strongest terms, which of course he enjoys doing, as he has been at odds with the Blond Buffoon since the leadership election of 2019. And, whatever else you think of Stewart, he does not have a wave named after him, except possibly of the dismissive hand-gesture variety.
At times, Stewart even sounds like my favourite sort of conservative. He muses on the virtues of his largely rural constituency and the Cumbrian way of life, the close-grained but supple timber of long-established civic traditions and customs that have evolved to serve the particularities of the region. Traditions are answers that have been discovered to enduring questions, observed Sir Roger Scruton. Stewart seems instinctively to grasp the wisdom of this.
Why, then, does he get people’s incandescent fury over the grooming gangs so wrong? I think the answer might lie in the way that Rory wants to be understood.
Gove introduced him as a ‘Renaissance Man’, but this really does not withstand even the most cursory scrutiny. Does he paint, sculpt, write poetry, study anatomy and devise siege engines and weapons of war? Has he mastered opera and surgery, as well as public discourse?
No. He talks, and he writes. He is, according to Gove’s bathetic inventory, a former soldier (very briefly, it must be noted) and then diplomat, MP, podcast host and author. All of which are just different shades and angles of light cast on the same form. What he does is muse and yak, in a variety of unremarkable contemporary modes.
Stewart’s early life is the upper-class equivalent of pawn to K4. Educated at the Dragon School (which sounds literally fabulous, but is in truth very establishment), Eton and then Balliol, Oxford, where he studied PPE – Pointing, Pontificating and Explaining. To regard any of this as rich in experience is a stretch.
His career has been saved from traditional political-aspirant boilerplate by a single diversion. This was his Grand Tour, around a quarter century ago, largely alone, across Iran, Afghanistan and South Asia.
This, as related in his book, The Places in Between (2005), was surely his greatest achievement. It is the kind of thing – cards on table – of which I generally approve, indeed envy. It is in a proud tradition not only of Arabists like Lawrence of Arabia and Wilfred Thesiger, and travel writers (albeit with a grittier war record) like Eric Newby, but also of an almost eerily familiar precursor, his namesake John ‘Walking’ Stewart.
This 19th-century long-form pedestrian was a well-known figure in Regency Britain, and highly regarded by the Romantics. John Stewart’s combination of miles trod and insights gained made him both a celebrity and an intellect taken seriously in his day – specifically, for his development of a somewhat pantheistic philosophy that impressed and influenced many of the Romantic poets, especially Wordsworth.
This, I can’t help thinking, is how Rory would like to be understood. If he could appear on platforms and podcasts clutching a staff, I think he would. He does not even aspire to be a Renaissance Man. He considers himself to be a Wise Man.
There is nothing wrong with this. I have myself expressed a desire to one day be known as The Sage of somewhere, like Mencken, Emerson or Carlyle. But it needs the Afghan hike, and encounters with actual yaks, to give it any chance of landing. Because really, Rory’s trajectory otherwise could hardly be more conventional.
It is said that, by the age of 50, we all have the faces we deserve, and Rory’s is unmistakably that of a marmoset Mick Jagger, with a hint of Yoda. In a Star Wars offshoot, he would be a former captive from another planet, another humanoid race, now freed, well assimilated, and trusted adviser to the emperor (and equally distrusted by the emperor’s other counsellors).
Whether he deserves that face or not, he can’t help it. But he has chosen to enhance this aura, this ‘otherness’ with his dress. Part of his message is invariably illustrated through this medium, specifically his adoption of a curious sleeveless, collared jerkin that I take to be part of Afghan tribal wear.
All of which is fine. But when you are talking about crimes of an almost unimaginable grimness, perpetrated by what appears to be a very strong and organised network of people in this country who have brought those tribal practices with them, this genial plurality suddenly grates like a worn-out clutch. You simply cannot begin a discussion about rape gangs by ‘acknowledging’ all the wonderful consolations that many millions of people around the world find in their Islamic faith. Neither in your rhetoric, nor in your wardrobe.
Travel may well broaden the mind, but that can be at the expense of its edge.
Politics
‘States should have a say’: Candidates for governor race to take on AI regulation
Gubernatorial candidates across the country are racing to stake out positions on AI as the battle over regulating the technology intensifies.
They’re watching as sitting governors of both parties turn the rapidly evolving technology into a political priority, from Gavin Newsom in California to Ron DeSantis in Florida and Kathy Hochul in New York.
Now they’re starting to join the chorus, calling for more state-based action to put guardrails on AI — even if they don’t know what that would look like yet.
POLITICO reached out to more than 18 Republican and Democratic gubernatorial candidates on their plans and received responses from eight. Nearly all said they want states to take the lead on AI, signaling a frustration with Washington’s inaction and acknowledgement that — if they eventually secure the governor’s mansion — they can’t dismiss the growing warnings.
Candidates said they were motivated by different concerns including fraud, job displacement and children’s safety. Their lack of detail on just how to address AI also reveals a tricky pivot these gubernatorial candidates are facing: To date, much of their campaign messaging on AI or the technology race with China has focused on data centers’ impact on energy prices.
Now, with less than six weeks until Election Day, they’re attempting to talk about AI in a more existential — and more far-reaching — manner.
“The federal government has failed to lead on this issue, and we cannot trust the billionaires profiting off of AI to self-regulate,” said Gina Hinojosa, Texas’ Democratic nominee for governor, in a statement. “State government has the most direct impact on our day-to-day lives, and at a time when Texans are more uncertain and concerned about AI than ever, it’s critical that we put the needs of Texans before corporate profits.” (GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, Hinojosa’s opponent, did not respond to a list of questions.)
Former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, a Democrat who’s heavily favored to succeed Newsom in California, is in conversations with tech industry leaders and economists on the path forward. He will “work to set firm guardrails to prevent the threat of real harms to workers, to children, to our privacy rights, to public safety,” spokesperson Jonathan Underland said in a statement. “California is the birthplace of modern AI, and California will lead the way in making it safe.”
Becerra’s longshot Republican opponent, Steve Hilton, told POLITICO that there’s a place for narrow regulation on AI — even though he thinks some of the warnings are overblown and “preposterous.”
“California should lead on this because we are leading on the technology, and therefore we should lead on the regulation,” Hilton said. “I would prefer to see both the Congress and politicians in other states back off and stop talking about something they don’t understand.”
Recent warnings from top AI leaders about the technology’s potential apocalyptic trajectory roiled Democrats and Republicans both in Washington and on the campaign trail. According to a new POLITICO Poll, a majority of voters now think that AI poses an existential threat to humanity and a plurality want to see a pause in development of advanced models.
“There is a lot of education that’s needed here, and people are navigating an issue that they weren’t even really thinking about six months ago beyond the beyond ‘Should we have data centers’?” said Alyssa Cass, a Democratic strategist who has worked with Alex Bores, a New York state lawmaker who gained national attention in his failed campaign for Congress for opposition to unchecked AI.
“They’re talking about it,” she added. “That’s a meaningful difference.”
The National Governors Association, which convened a working group on AI’s impact on the workforce earlier this year, plans to release a policy roadmap for governors in November on how states can take action.
“We have 39 gubernatorial elections happening in November, and at least 21 new governors will be sworn in in January,” said Sophia Yager, the NGA’s policy director for workforce development and economic policy. “So we wanted to have a resource available not only for incumbent governors who are thinking and working on this issue, but for all of the new governors coming in, wanting to have something available for them from the jump in November.”
So far, Democrats have taken the sharpest aim at the Republican-controlled federal government for its inaction on establishing safeguards against AI.
“While regulation is strongest and most effective at the federal level, President [Donald] Trump dismisses the need for even the most basic guardrails, and we know it can take time for Congress to act,” said Federico Araujo, a spokesperson for Oregon’s Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek, who’s locked in a tightening battle for reelection. “States, in the meantime, must act with more urgency and do everything possible to manage how AI impacts our economies, energy prices and natural resources.”
David Crowley, the Democratic nominee in Wisconsin, told POLITICO in a statement that AI safety is “an issue Wisconsin can address” but “we need strong leadership and partners in Washington who are looking out for us at home.” Still, he didn’t offer specifics, and much of his battle with GOP nominee Tom Tiffany — and even the Democratic primary — has been focused on data centers’ proliferation in Wisconsin.
Tiffany did not respond to a request for comment.
The calls for action on state-based regulation have not been limited to Democrats alone. Republicans — including some Trump allies — signaled a willingness to create safe buffers for the technology at the state level, following the lead of governors like DeSantis and Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, who have long advocated for states’ abilities to install guardrails amid federal inaction.
“States should have a say in how AI is regulated,” said Dan Capodilupo, spokesperson for Iowa GOP gubernatorial nominee Zach Lahn. “Zach is committed to protecting states rights.” State Auditor Rob Sand, his Democratic opponent, did not respond to a request for comment.
In Georgia, Garrison Douglas, a spokesperson for GOP nominee Rick Jackson, stopped short of calling for local regulations but said that the health care executive “supports efforts to ensure that new models are tested for risks and that safety standards are established. He added that Jackson is “committed” to working with the state legislature on protecting consumers from AI-driven scams.
Georgia’s Democratic nominee Keisha Lance Bottoms did not respond to a request for comment.
Trump has labeled concerns about AI’s existential threat a “HOAX” and derided efforts to regulate the technology, and his White House has pushed preemption of state-level regulation. In February, the White House urged Utah legislators to abandon an AI transparency bill; the administration has similarly gone after state-level legislation in Colorado and in California.
A POLITICO review of state-level legislation found 18 laws in 13 states, led by both Republicans and Democrats, that contradict the White House’s preemption framework.
These candidates’ calls for state-based action mirror some early actions that both red and blue state executives are taking from their statehouse perches, explicitly defying Trump’s hands-off approach to regulating the nascent but powerful industry.
This week, Cox urged Washington to “establish a consistent national framework for the development of frontier AI,” and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, in a speech at an AI-focused conference in Pittsburgh, called for the “federal government to step up and regulate the AI industry just like they do for nearly every other industry that significantly impacts our lives.”
Shapiro — who’s up for reelection in the battleground state this year and is considered a 2028 presidential contender — outlined what he sees as the stakes of slow-walking protective measures.
“By the time Congress comes back into session after the election, we could be dealing with a whole new generation of generative AI, and more scary examples of AI agents going rogue,” he said.
Lisa Kashinsky contributed to this report.
-
Fashion2 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Talbots – Corporette.com
-
Tech7 days agoThe Latest Weird Thing to Play Doom Is the Mapped-Out Brain of a Fruit Fly
-
NewsBeat2 days agoTrump says US has reached an agreement to take permanent control of Greenland’s security
-
Crypto World5 days agoKraken Lets xStocks Holders Earn Yield Through DeFi
-
Crypto World6 days agoRevolut Attackers Warn of Ongoing Daily Customer Data Leaks
-
Crypto World1 day agoCircle launches Arc Studio AI agent for building onchain apps
-
Crypto World4 days agoWhat Is the Status of the U.S.-Iran Peace Talks? Here's What Both Sides Are Saying
-
Crypto World4 days agoUS Charges Robinhood Engineers Over Crypto Listing Trades
-
Crypto World5 days agoRobinhood engineers charged over $50K crypto scheme
-
Crypto World1 day agoBitcoin price breaks channel as RSI climbs to 63
-
Crypto World6 days agoElon Musk Drops a Bombshell: Grok 5 Could Be the AGI Breakthrough
-
Crypto World7 days agoNew Tesla Roadster Uses SpaceX Tech. Will It Impact the Stock Price?
-
NewsBeat6 days ago‘Sick conspiracy’: Trump says only guardrails AI needs is ‘a strong and smart (High IQ!) president’ in all-caps rant
-
Crypto World5 days agoNVIDIA Analysis: Attempted Rising Wedge Breakout Amid Pressure on the AI Sector
-
Business6 days ago
SK Hynix ADRs Fall More Than 6% as Memory Rally Breaks on Fears of Slower AI Spending
-
Tech4 days agoWebb’s IC 348 Mosaic Includes Two-Jupiter Dwarfs, Twin Jets, and a Nursery Still Making Worlds
-
Crypto World6 days ago3 Token Unlocks to Watch in the Third Week of September 2026
-
Crypto World6 days agoDOJ Seeks to Seize $61M in Iran Oil Funds From Binance Accounts It Vouched For
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Can Circle’s Arc Repeat Robinhood Chain’s Meme Coin Boom?
-
Crypto World7 days agoGoldman Sachs backs 25bp Fed hike after CPI

You must be logged in to post a comment Login