The takeaway: Payment organizations have launched a new joint venture to promote Europe’s sovereignty in the payments industry. The European Network for Payments (ENP) is designed to increase interoperability among competing networks, building a common EU infrastructure that should theoretically give Visa, Mastercard, and other US-based giants a very hard time on European soil. Ultimately, ENP could help reduce Europe’s reliance on US-based payment networks as tensions between Washington and Europe continue to grow.

The original ENP initiative launched in 2023, but European sovereignty is now becoming a truly critical issue. The new network’s founders include Bizum (Spain), Bancomat (Italy), European digital wallet company Wero, SIBS-MB WAY, and Vipps MobilePay.

Together, these payment networks already cover 70% of Europe’s and Norway’s population, serving the payment needs of 130 million users across 13 different European countries.

Rather than creating a completely new network, ENP will work on building closer partnerships among payment networks that already exist. First, the new Madrid-based organization will focus on properly connecting the existing networks, adopting a common technical and operational infrastructure based on European standards.

According to ENP’s deployment plan, the common infrastructure will go through a phased rollout, starting with cross-border payments and in-person transactions. ENP should eventually expand its reach to e-commerce and other online payments, in-store point-of-sale transactions, and essentially everything else.

ENP proponents said the organization expects to welcome additional members in the future, further increasing the network’s ability to cover the payment needs of European citizens. ENP expects to absorb the network’s operating costs at first, allowing the basic infrastructure to be built before it begins generating its own fees.

According to European Payments Initiative CEO Martina Weimert, fragmentation has long hindered any major attempt to build a common payment platform within the Old Continent. ENP is now offering a cooperation-based answer, asking other EU-based payment organizations to join the effort as well.

The European Central Bank is also working on its own solution for a common payment tool with the digital euro currency. A few years down the line, the bank-controlled euro wallet might become a complementary payment platform to ENP.

Fubo’s U.S. lineup includes national sports, news and entertainment networks, optional channel packages, local broadcast stations, and regional sports networks. Your exact lineup depends on the plan you choose, any add-ons you buy, and your home location.

This guide organizes a broad verified Fubo channel reference as of October 3, 2026. It also links to Fubo’s live tools for channel, local-station and regional-sports data that can change after publication.

How to read this Fubo channel database

There are three main types of channel lookup. National and specialty networks are mapped to plans and add-ons. Local stations are tied to television markets. Regional sports networks, usually shortened to RSNs, are assigned according to your home ZIP code.

Fubo’s channel finder shows the plans and add-ons associated with a listed network. Local affiliates and regional sports networks use separate location-based tools.

A plan label beside a channel does not necessarily mean every new subscriber can select that plan. Use the directory to understand channel-to-package relationships, then confirm which plans Fubo actually offers to your account and market.

Complete Fubo channel directory

Fubo’s main directory is the broadest source for national, specialty, sports, news, entertainment, international, radio and free ad-supported channels. The most useful fields are the channel name, its plan membership and any add-on membership.

The groups below organize commonly searched and clearly verified networks by purpose. Because carriage and package placement can change, use the live channel finder for the latest channel-to-package mapping.

National sports channels

• ACC Network
• Big Ten Network
• CBS Sports Network
• ESPN
• ESPN2
• ESPNews
• ESPNU
• FOX Sports 1
• FOX Sports 2
• Fubo Sports Network
• NFL Network
• SEC Network
• Tennis Channel

The wider Fubo directory also contains specialty sports services that can depend on plan or add-on, including NBA TV, NHL Network, NFL RedZone, MLB-related services, FOX Soccer Plus, FOX Deportes, ESPN Deportes, beIN Sports, beIN Sports Español, TyC Sports, Fight Network and SportsGrid.

News channels

• ABC News Live
• FOX News
• Africa News
• Cheddar News
• i24NEWS
• additional services mapped to News Plus or Fubo Extra

News-channel membership varies by package. Search a specific network when it is important to your subscription decision.

Entertainment and general-interest channels

• Bravo
• Comedy Central
• Paramount Network
• Nickelodeon
• National Geographic
• Nat Geo Wild
• MTV2
• MTV Classic
• TeenNick
• BET Her
• BET Jams
• BET Soul
• ION

These channels are not all part of the same tier. Some belong to broad base plans, while others are tied to expanded packages such as Fubo Extra.

Spanish-language channels

• beIN Sports Español
• ESPN Deportes
• Estrella TV
• Fubo Latino Network
• FOX Deportes
• Telemundo
• TyC Sports
• Universo

Spanish-language channels can appear across Latino, Latino Plus, International Sports Plus and English-language packages. Check the individual network if you need its exact package assignment.

International channels and packages

• Portuguese Plus programming
• Rai Italia
• TV5 Monde
• International Sports Plus programming
• Zee-family programming listed in the live directory

Free and specialty streams

The directory can also contain free ad-supported feeds, Fubo-owned channels, digital sports streams and radio-style services that do not behave like traditional cable networks. Treat each directory row according to the plan or package shown beside it rather than assuming every entry is part of a paid base plan.

Fubo channels by current plan

If you already know the plan you are considering, use its name as a filter in the master directory. Checking your must-have networks is more useful than comparing raw channel counts.

Pro channel list

Pro is the broad English-language base option. Major national sports networks associated with the standard Fubo lineup include ESPN, ESPN2, CBS Sports Network, FOX Sports 1, FOX Sports 2, NFL Network, ACC Network, Big Ten Network and SEC Network.

Local broadcast affiliates and regional sports networks require separate location checks.

Core channel list

The first question with Core is whether it is available in your area. Where offered, it overlaps heavily with Fubo’s broad English-language lineup, including major sports networks such as ESPN, ESPN2, FS1, FS2, CBS Sports Network and NFL Network.

Elite channel list

Elite expands the standard lineup with additional channel packages. That can add secondary sports, entertainment and news networks such as NBA TV, NHL Network, Nat Geo Wild, MTV2, MTV Classic, TeenNick and BET specialty channels where those package mappings apply.

Ultra channel list

Ultra is another expanded English-language configuration and is available only in select areas. Because it overlaps with Elite in several channel groups, compare the exact package shown to your account rather than assuming that every higher-tier label contains an identical lineup.

Sports + News channel list

Sports + News has the clearest self-contained national lineup. Fubo currently lists these national channels:

Programming from ESPN Unlimited is also integrated into Sports + News. Local programming is available only in participating areas and uses a separate market table.

Latino channel list

Latino is the Spanish-language base plan. Verified examples across Latino and related Spanish-language packages include beIN Sports, beIN Sports Español, ESPN Deportes, Estrella TV, Fubo Latino Network, Telemundo, TyC Sports and Universo.

Latino Plus and International Sports Plus can add more Spanish-language or international sports programming.

Channel access does not guarantee every match from a league or competition. Sports rights can be divided among several broadcasters, so soccer viewers should compare the competition they follow with the official soccer streaming services available in their region.

Complete Fubo add-on channel lists

Add-ons matter when a base plan has most of what you watch but is missing a particular sports, premium, international or specialty group.

Sports add-ons

Expanded news and entertainment add-ons

• Fubo Extra
• News Plus
• Adventure Plus
• Fubo Select

Premium entertainment add-ons

• MGM+
• Paramount+ with SHOWTIME
• Starz
• FOX Nation
• Hallmark+

FOX Nation and Hallmark+ are on-demand services rather than normal linear live-guide channels.

International and language add-ons

• Latino Plus
• Portuguese Plus
• Rai Italia
• TV5 Monde

Package membership can change, so search the live directory by add-on name when you need the latest channel-level mapping.

Complete Fubo local channel list by market

Local television cannot be represented accurately by a single nationwide list of ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC or CW. Each television market has its own affiliates, and Fubo’s local availability differs by market and service.

A call sign is the identifier for an individual local station, such as WABC in New York or KABC in Los Angeles.

Sports + News local channel examples

The Sports + News service has its own local-channel table. These examples come from that specific service and should not be treated as a universal base-plan local lineup:

The Sports + News local lookup also contains CW entries in many markets and notes that independent local channels and local broadcast sports channels can be available in eligible areas.

English base-plan local stations

Fubo maintains a separate local-station database for its English-language base plans. That directory includes ABC, CBS, FOX, CW, MyNetworkTV and independent station rows across U.S. markets.

Use Fubo’s base-plan local-channel search by city or call sign to check the affiliate available in your area.

National fallback feeds

Some areas receive national network feeds instead of a conventional local affiliate. Fubo documents ABC time-zone feeds and FOXNET as examples.

FOXNET carries national FOX programming, but Fubo states that NFL programming is not available on FOXNET.

Complete Fubo regional sports network list

Regional sports networks provide local sports coverage within defined territories. Your home ZIP code determines which RSNs Fubo makes available to your account.

Fubo’s current regional-sports page says RSNs are included with Pro, Core, Elite, Elite with Sports Plus and Ultra. Core and Ultra are available only in select areas.

The expandable full RSN roster is maintained on Fubo’s own page, while the visible current guidance confirms examples such as Space City Home Network, Altitude Sports, MSG and YES Network.

For example, Fubo explains that a Houston Rockets vs. Denver Nuggets game shown nationally and regionally can be blacked out on the national feed in Houston and Denver while local viewers receive Space City Home Network or Altitude Sports instead.

Use Fubo’s ZIP-based regional sports lookup for the full set available to your account.

Channels not listed in Fubo’s current directory

Do not assume a familiar cable network is on Fubo because another live-TV service carries it or because an older lineup article mentions it.

As checked against Fubo’s channel finder on October 3, 2026, no matching entries were found for these high-interest networks:

• TNT
• TBS
• CNN
• Food Network
• HGTV

This is a dated lookup result, not a permanent statement about future carriage. Search the live channel finder again if one of those networks determines your subscription choice.

Channel count alone is also a poor substitute for checking the programming you actually watch. The same principle applies when comparing free and paid streaming services: a smaller lineup with your must-have networks can be more useful than a larger one without them.

For a must-have channel, verify the network first and compare plans second. That avoids choosing a package for its headline channel count only to discover that the network you care about is missing or requires a separate add-on.

Frontline Education is notifying school districts of a data breach after attackers exploited a vulnerability in third-party software to gain unauthorized access to its systems and steal employee information, including Social Security numbers.

Frontline Education is an edtech company that provides administration and workforce management software and services used by school districts.

Last night, a reader shared a data breach notification with BleepingComputer that Frontline sent to an impacted school district, stating that attackers breached its environment through a vulnerability in a third-party application.

“On August 14, 2026, our security team identified a vulnerability in a third-party software product we use that allowed unauthorized access to a portion of the environment,” the notification letter reads.

“We promptly investigated the issue with the assistance of an independent cybersecurity firm, remediated the vulnerability, engaged with law enforcement, and took steps to further reinforce the security of our systems.”

The company has not disclosed which third-party application was involved or when the unauthorized access first occurred.

For the notification seen by BleepingComputer, our source said all employees at the district were impacted, with exposed information including Social Security numbers, email addresses, and physical addresses.

BleepingComputer contacted Frontline Education yesterday about the breach but did not receive a reply to our email.

However, school IT administrators reported on the K12SysAdmin subreddit that district officials had begun to receive similar notifications.

One administrator initially said their superintendent and business manager received the notification on October 1 from frontline@notifications.cyberscout.com, but Frontline support had not yet confirmed whether the message was legitimate.

However, other administrators later said they had independently confirmed the breach notifications were legitimate.

“Can confirm this is legitimate. We’ve had verbal contact with our Frontline rep on it,” one administrator reported.

One administrator also shared a copy of a Frontline notification stating that 1,210 employees associated with their district were impacted and that Social Security numbers, email addresses, and addresses were also exposed.

Frontline says it will handle notifications to affected individuals on behalf of impacted school districts unless a district opts out by October 16.

Districts that want to opt out can do so through www.frontline-transunion.com or by calling 833-516-8792. If a district opts out, Frontline says it will not provide notification services or reimburse the district for the costs of issuing its own notices.

Impacted adults are being offered two years of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection through TransUnion, while minors will be offered cyber monitoring services.

The company says it will also handle required notifications to state attorneys general and cover costs associated with individual notifications and the identity protection services.

It is unclear how many school districts or individuals were affected.

Join Mikko Hyppönen and security leaders from the NFL, CHANEL, and Atlassian for a two-hour digital summit on what AI-speed attacks change, what defenders should stop doing, and how to validate, decide, fix, and re-validate at machine speed.

Save your seat

Meta’s Muse, a personal AI agent that books travel, fills out forms, and shops on a user’s behalf, has already proven popular with the masses, but a new side project could be particularly alluring to tinkerers and hackers.

On Friday, the company introduced Muse Gadgets, an open-source project that lets developers build their own hardware that connects to Muse.

Meta is providing open-source firmware (the low-level software that runs a device), and a Linux software development kit (SDK), along with a few project ideas to get users started. These include giving Muse a color e-ink display or loading it onto a stick that plugs into a TV’s HDMI port.

There don’t appear to be many limits, either. Users can set up a low-cost hobbyist computer like a Raspberry Pi or an off-the-shelf ESP32 board, and then connect Muse “to your displays, buttons, sensors, actuators, and whatever else you’ve got lying on your workbench,” Meta notes.

The company has also set up a Discord channel to support users.

Meta has already tried the code itself, naturally. Nat Friedman, head of product at Meta’s Superintelligence Labs, said in a post on X that the company built a gadget called Muse Home Link. The USB-C-powered device lets Muse connect to a home network and talk to the smart devices on it, including speakers and smart TVs.

Meta made 5,000 of these Home Links, in fact, and is giving them away for free to Muse subscribers while supplies last, according to Friedman. Considering Friedman’s post about Home Link received nearly 30,000 views in a few hours, we’re guessing those freebies have been claimed. Friedman said Home Link would be ready to ship a few weeks.

Muse Gadgets may not have wide appeal, but it fits nicely into Meta’s all-in strategy to make Muse more than a standalone chatbot. Meta isn’t content to push Muse on everyday consumers; it’s also trying to woo small businesses and enterprises.

The company earlier this week introduced Muse for Small Business, which is free with usage limits and connects Muse to tools such as Shopify, Dropbox, and Slack. It has also launched a new business unit, Meta Enterprise Platform, to help it push its AI offerings to businesses and corporate customers.

With Paramount CEO David Ellison overcoming the final hurdle blocking his expansion of the Paramount media empire, the billionaire media executive announced on X (formerly Twitter) that the newly merged entity combining Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery will be named Skydance.

The announcement comes after the company entered into a consent decree to settle antitrust claims brought by a group of 12 state attorneys general, who had sued in July over concerns that the merger would concentrate too much control over news networks, cable TV and the film industry. With the last legal opposition cleared, the path was open to finalize the massive the $111 billion merger on Sept. 21.

“Together, we are Skydance: a creative-first home for bold, quality storytelling,” Ellison posted on Friday. “We wanted a name that would give the combined company an identity of its own while allowing Paramount and Warner Bros. — and all our extraordinary brands — to remain in the spotlight.”

There was a year-long bidding battle for Warner Bros. Discovery, leaving Ellison as the top bidder after Netflix dropped out. The name Skydance comes from Ellison’s love of aviation and aerobatic “skydancing.” David’s father is Larry Ellison, co-founder and CTO of Oracle, and one of the richest people in the world.

A Hollywood empire of studios, news, networks and streamers

As viewers, it’s unclear how streaming content from Warner Bros., HBO and Paramount via apps like HBO Max and Paramount Plus will change. But the merger will undeniably affect employees at the mega media company, now one of the largest in history. Much of the legal opposition concerned their fate, and the consent decree attempted to safeguard employment, film production and distribution and consumer pricing. 

In practice, employees usually lose out in corporate consolidation, regardless of protections. Harvard Business Review estimated that up to 30% of workers get laid off in mergers like these, where there’s a significant overlap in the business, though that oft-cited figure is from 2017. 

The bigger worry, though, is media monopoly. Critics worry that adding CNN to the company’s portfolio could lead to widespread restructuring and corporate upheaval, similar to recent struggles at the CBS News division. Corporate convergence also risks homogenizing news content by potentially suppressing divergent viewpoints — all for minimal reward, given that CBS’s own ratings are reportedly way down.

“If this trend of consolidation continues, we will be left searching dominant media outlets in vain for news and information that challenges the powerful and stands up for people who are struggling to pay monthly bills, put food on the table and engage in local civic life,” nonprofit watchdog Free Press co-CEO Jessica J. González said in a prepared statement earlier this week.

The Block the Merger coalition also posted a follow-up statement: “Allowing the Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery merger to move forward with no meaningful structural remedies will cost jobs, mute creativity, weaken independent journalism, and damage our First Amendment rights. The ripples of this merger will be far-reaching, long-lasting, and impossible to contain.”

The Writers Guild of America East and Writers Guild of America West had filed a separate lawsuit to halt the merger, alleging that it was illegal and would harm writers. Once the state attorneys general backed out of the battle, WGA cited an inability to sustain legal costs on its own and dropped its companion lawsuit.

As part of the consent decree, Paramount agreed to establish an oversight board of journalists to protect the editorial independence of CNN and CBS News. Critics have called the oversight board “toothless,” noting that its members are appointed and paid by the company, that its authority is unclear and unbinding, and that final control rests with Ellison.

We reached out to Skydance for comment and didn’t immediately hear back.

Disclosure: Lori Grunin has stock in Paramount from when CNET was owned by CBS.

Lori Grunin

Senior Editor / Computers and Gaming Hardware

I’ve been reviewing hardware and software, devising testing methodology and handing out buying advice for more than 25 years.

See full bio

Advertisement

from the land-of-the-not-so-free-after-all dept

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

In the lead-up to the 2026 midterm elections, how is the U.S. government performing in terms of human rights? Listening to politicians, it can be difficult to know.

On one hand, some have pointed to a number of potential human rights abuses committed by the U.S. government inside and outside its borders in the past two years.

On the other hand, while marking the United States’ 250th anniversary this year, President Donald Trump called the country “the home of freedom,” “the land of liberty” and “the most extraordinary, most exceptional, most incredible nation ever to exist on the face of the earth.”

“We’re doing better now than we’ve ever done before,” he said.

So which is it?

According to many of the human rights data sources available, the U.S. lags behind most other high-income democracies – countries that are both members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and classified as high income by the World Bank. The U.S.’s poor performance spans civil and political rights, such as the right to be free from torture and the right to political participation, as well as economic and social rights, including the rights to health and food.

In fact, the U.S. has been a relatively poor performer across many of these rights for quite some time, regardless of the political party in power.

Even accounting for the U.S.’s prior poor practices, however, new data from the Human Rights Measurement Initiative shows that in 2025 the country’s civil and political rights performance deteriorated even further.

As a human rights scholar who has been measuring human rights practices for 20 years – and as one of HRMI’s co-founders – I believe this data raises serious questions about the United States’ commitment to human rights.

How are rights practices measured?

Governments rarely publish accurate information on their own human rights abuses, so the task of measuring them typically falls to advocates and scholars.

Historically, most international measures of civil and political rights have depended on public reports from the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch or news organizations.

However, these reports cannot cover every human rights violation that experts know about, especially in countries with low government transparency or high levels of repression.

Thus, data produced using those sources will show fewer abuses than those that have actually occurred and will be more accurate about some places than others. Further, the Trump administration has changed one of the most important sources of human rights information, the U.S. State Department’s Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, to contain more bias in favor of the administration’s foreign allies and less information on human rights abuse overall.

Since 2017, HRMI has used a different approach. Recognizing the problems with public reports, we collect information directly from researchers for human rights organizations, human rights lawyers and others, asking them about governments’ practices across several rights and using a statistical model to assess their information and ensure that the resulting metrics are comparable across countries. The result is a robust dataset that includes information previously missing from public reports.

Today, HRMI’s civil and political rights dataset covers 62 countries, with more added every year.

How does the US compare?

According to the Human Rights Scores dataset, which uses publicly available information to score more than 190 countries on physical integrity rights – such as the rights to be free from torture, killing, forced disappearance and political imprisonment – the U.S. never ranked higher than 81st from 2001 to 2021 or higher than 109th from 2010 to 2021.

Indeed, from 2003 to 2021, the United States’ score was either the worst or the second-worst every year among high-income OECD member states, which include the United Kingdom, Japan and New Zealand.

The Human Rights Scores dataset has not been updated past 2021, but HRMI’s data collected since that time suggests that the pattern has continued.

Among the six high-income OECD countries on which HRMI currently collects data, the U.S. has been the worst performer for physical integrity rights since 2017.

It has also frequently been rated as the worst performer on “empowerment rights,” or the rights to assembly, association, opinion, expression, political participation, religion and belief.

What changed in 2025?

Even starting from this poor position, the U.S.’s civil and political rights practices dramatically worsened in 2025. HRMI measures nine civil and political rights, and the U.S. significantly worsened on eight of them.

These were not small changes. Measured against every significant change HRMI has recorded since 2017, the U.S. showed the largest decline ever observed for the right to be free from forced disappearance and for the right to freedom of religion and belief.

The U.S. showed the second-largest decline ever observed for the right to be free from arbitrary or political arrest and for the right to opinion and expression.

The U.S. also showed major declines in the rights to be free from torture and extrajudicial killing, and the right to political participation – that is, the right to participate in one’s government via free and fair elections, to take part in public affairs and to have access to public service. U.S. scores likewise fell in the right to assembly and association, which are, respectively, the rights to peacefully gather in public or private and to form or join groups and organizations.

What caused the scores to fall?

Human rights experts raised several issues that led to these declines. For instance, the U.S.’s worsened scores for the rights to be free from arbitrary detention, disappearance and torture were tied to the expanded use of practices such as incommunicado detention and warrantless arrest by ICE and other immigration-related agencies.

While several killings occurred during ICE operations in 2025, the worsened extrajudicial killing score was also tied to the country’s use of airstrikes against boats in the Pacific and Caribbean, which caused the deaths of at least 123 people in 2025 alone.

Other changes enacted in 2025 contributed to large declines in the U.S.’s rights scores, including crackdowns on anti-ICE demonstrations and government pressure on universities, including limits on free speech and class subjects.

Last year also saw threats to television networks over political expression, restrictions on mail-in voting, state measures targeting American Islamic organizations by labeling them “foreign terrorist organizations” and an executive order focused on eradicating “anti-Christian bias.”

While current HRMI data does not yet cover 2026, early indicators are not promising, with continued abuses by ICE, further killings in international waters and allegations of attempts to use government powers to punish critics.

K. Chad Clay is the Director of the Center for the Study of Global Issues (GLOBIS) and an Associate Professor of International Affairs at the University of Georgia.

Filed Under: human rights

Companies: oecd