Haven’t seen anything you like? The following phones are also worth considering:
Xiaomi 17T for £649 and 17T Pro for $870: If it weren’t for Honor’s high pricing, one of these phones (probably the 17T) would have claimed the best mid-range spot above. Compared with the Honor 600, the 17T offers slightly better performance with more RAM and a more reliable camera that has superior zoom capability. Unfortunately, it also has bags of bloatware, and the software requires some tinkering to get the best it offers. The 17T Pro adds wireless charging, a bigger battery, much better performance with a faster chipset, and a larger screen—but it’s even more expensive, pushing the top end of what I’d consider midrange.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Oppo Find N6 for $1,943: Touting an 8.12-inch display, the Find N6 is a beautifully engineered folding phone that’s impossibly slim and light. Despite its promise of being creaseless, the fold is still discernible. You’ll hardly notice it when the screen is on, though you’ll feel it if you use the optional stylus. Performance is impressively slick, with enough stamina to see you through a busy day, and the camera system is excellent. It’s a big step up from last year’s N5, with a 200-MP main shooter, 50-MP telephoto, and 50-MP ultrawide, though it can’t quite compete with the Xiaomi 17 Ultra above. The global model is enabled to use familiar Google apps, but you’ll have to import those, as the phone won’t officially be released in the West, which is the main reason it fails to edge out Honor’s foldable above.
Xiaomi 15T Pro for $745: This phone is fast, with a large, high-refresh-rate screen; a versatile Leica-tuned camera system that includes a 50-MP telephoto lens offering 5X optical zoom; and a solid list of extras, including generous and speedy UFS 4.1 storage and Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 connectivity. The big downside here for most folks is the quirky software, but with a bit of effort, it’s possible to customize it into shape. There’s also some bloatware to remove, and Xiaomi doesn’t match some competitors on software support. The regular 15T is almost the same size but has a slightly weaker chipset and camera, a plastic frame, and misses out on wireless charging.
Advertisement
Infinix Note 60 Ultra for $750: Designed with the help of Pininfarina, famous for iconic cars from Ferrari and Maserati, the Note 60 Ultra looks interesting, with a distinctive curved glass section over the camera module that also houses a small matrix display. The phone arrives in a grand box with a curvy car-shaped wireless charger. The specs are solid, apart from the distinctly not “Ultra” chipset (MediaTek’s Dimensity 8400 Ultimate), but availability seems limited for now.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max for $1,039: A refreshing design featuring a second, smaller screen on the back that houses the camera lenses is the main way the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max differs from the 17 Pro. Xiaomi came up with various cute ways to employ this auxiliary display, including a selfie preview for superior selfies with the main camera, music controls, customizable themes, and virtual pets. There’s even a retro gaming case that lets you play Angry Birds, though it feels a bit silly when there’s a 6.7-inch screen on the other side. Aside from the second screen, the 17 Pro Max is a typical Xiaomi specs beast, and the 17 Pro isn’t far behind, but neither has been officially released outside China yet.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Oppo Find X9 Pro for £1,099: Photography fans simply must check out the Oppo Find X9 Pro. The 200-megapixel telephoto lens supports 3X optical zoom and can take excellent shots at 6X zoom by cropping images down to 50 megapixels. To maximize camera capabilities, though, you’ll need the detachable Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit ($399). This enormous lens slots into place on the case and adds another 3.28X zoom, though it’s tricky to use without a tripod. An additional trio of 50-MP lenses, with all supporting 4K video recording at 60 fps with HDR, makes this a great pick for creatives. Impressive specs include a 6.78-inch flat display, IP66/68/69 ratings, and a 7,500-mAh silicon-carbon battery that’ll last for two days.
Advertisement
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra for £497 and F8 Pro for £331: Xiaomi’s cheaper, fun, youthful brand Poco provides room for experimentation, but the company’s own 15T Pro is a better buy in this price bracket. What the F8 Ultra offers that you won’t find elsewhere is a fun or awful (depending on your tastes) denim finish on the back. There are also Bose-tuned speakers, an excellent 6.9-inch display, and an enormous 6,500-mAh battery. It also has a flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and generous RAM and storage. There’s even a trio of 50-MP lenses in the camera. The F8 Pro is slightly smaller but drops little from the spec sheet, making it the better bargain.
Honor Magic 7 Pro for $999:Honor’s Magic 7 Pro features a solid triple-lens camera, a gorgeous 6.8-inch screen, speedy performance, good battery life, and a dual IP68 and IP69 dust- and water-resistance rating. Honor’s Magic OS boasts polished AI features, and Honor announced an increased commitment to seven years of Android version and security patch updates with this phone. The Magic 7 Pro’s downsides include its large camera cutout on the front, camera processing that’s sometimes heavy-handed, and its ultrawide camera struggling to match the other two lenses.
Advertisement
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro for $403: Xiaomi’s Poco X7 Pro is a compelling bargain that combines a lovely 6.67-inch display with relatively fast performance, good battery life, speedy wired charging, and IP68 water resistance. The 50-megapixel main camera is decent. The Poco X7 Pro runs Android 15 with HyperOS on top, and Xiaomi offers three Android version updates and four years of security patches. This was my budget pick before the Poco F7 (discontinued), and then the X8 Pro unseated it.
Doro Aurora A20 for £250: Doro is a Swedish company focused on providing devices that are accessible for older folks. It primarily focuses on phones but also sells a decent video doorbell. The Aurora A20 is an odd spin on the flip phone that may help some people transition to a touchscreen device. It’s like an old candy bar HTC Android phone with a flip-out keypad attached to the bottom. There are lots of thoughtful features, including an alarm button, a spacious keypad, and simplified software. It’s also fairly cheap, but I found the performance sluggish, the camera poor, and the design a bit chunky and heavy.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Realme 14 Pro+ for €369: The color-changing finish may be gimmicky, but it’s fun, and this phone looks and feels far more expensive than it is. There are more highs than lows on the spec sheet: You get a triple-lens camera, an IP68/69 water-resistance rating, a 6,000-mAh battery, and a 6.83-inch OLED display with a 120-Hz refresh rate. But the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset is limited, there’s no wireless charging support, and you don’t get a charger in the box. Even so, it’s still quite a bargain.
Advertisement
Xiaomi 15 for $750: Folks seeking a compact phone could do a lot worse than the Xiaomi 15. It feels lovely and has a 6.36-inch screen, a decent triple-lens camera, and top-notch internals. But it’s a conservative design, and it has software and bloatware issues.
Honor Magic 7 RSR for £1,550: Designed with Porsche, this souped-up version of the 7 Pro above has a fancier design with a hexagonal camera module, a slightly improved telephoto lens, 24 GB of RAM (likely largely pointless), 1 TB of storage, and a bigger battery (5,850 mAh). It’s lovely, but it doesn’t do enough to justify the additional outlay.
Avoid These Phones
These aren’t necessarily bad phones, but I think you’d be better served by an option above.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite: There’s a retro-cool vibe to Nothing’s translucent hardware and pixelated software, and this is currently the cheapest phone it offers in the UK (it wasn’t released in the US). The screen, battery life, and software are decent, but the camera and bloatware were disappointing. I don’t think the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is the worst, but you can do better.
Advertisement
Nubia Z80 Ultra: Similar to my gaming pick above, the Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro, the Nubia Z80 Ultra trades off a better camera for slightly diminished performance and screen quality. It’s also a real brick with an enormous camera module on the back, making it awkward to handle, though I do like the dedicated camera button. Despite a very impressive spec sheet for the money, it manages to feel like less than the sum of its parts. Nubia’s software is subpar, and for this phone, it commits to only three years of security updates and a single Android version upgrade.
Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G: This slim, lightweight midrange phone boasts a 6.8-inch screen (brightness is limited), a triple-lens camera (solid 50-MP main and telephoto lenses with a disappointing 8-MP ultrawide), and an impressive IP69 water-resistance rating. Battery life is good, and wired charging is fast, but there’s no wireless charging. It’s packed with bloatware but also AI features and tools covering transcription, summarization, image editing, and more that may add value for some folks. After some time with the 13 Pro, I feel you can do better for the money.
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4: Officially released only in China, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 is a stylish folding phone with a 6.56-inch outer screen that folds open to reveal a 7.98-inch inner screen. It also offers solid performance and battery life, but despite having a large quad-lens camera module, the camera is underwhelming. The crease is also pronounced, and using a Chinese model is a bit of a pain, as various items are not translated, and getting the apps you want takes work.
Advertisement
Photograph: Simon Hill
Realme GT7 Pro: This potential flagship killer has a 6.78-inch OLED screen, a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, and an enormous 6,500-mAh battery. You also get a triple-lens camera, but the 50-megapixel main and telephoto lenses are let down by the 8-megapixel ultrawide. It also lacks wireless charging, and it only seems to be on sale in Germany.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+: Here, you’ll get an attractive and durable design (IP68), a 200-megapixel Samsung camera sensor, and decent battery life with superfast charging (120 watts). But those wins come at the price of middling performance, poor ultrawide (8 MP) and macro (2 MP) lenses, and a ton of bloatware. Ultimately, there’s little improvement over last year’s Redmi Note 13 Pro+. Not only are there better phones for the same money—there are better Xiaomi phones.
Should You Import One of These Phones?
While some phones are not officially sold in the US (or certain other countries), you can still get your hands on them if you’d like. They’re often easy to buy online, and you may even find some on Amazon. But before you buy, you’ll want to consider a few factors.
Advertisement
Phone Model and Supported Bands
The technologies and specific bands upon which cellular networks rely differ from country to country. While models described as “global” and even specifically UK or European models are likely to work in the US, they may not support all the bands your carrier uses. Missing LTE or 5G bands can mean patchy service or even relegate you to 3G. Chinese and other country-specific models will almost certainly lack some common US bands and may not work on some carrier networks.
You will often find this information in the listing or aggregated on websites like Kimovil, but I recommend checking directly with the manufacturer and your carrier.
Customs Charges
Advertisement
Depending on where you buy, importing a phone can lead to customs charges and add a significant expense to the overall cost. Do your research and factor in any extra fees before you buy.
Android and Google Services
It is common for phones released only in China to ship without any Google services, including the Google Play Store. Many Chinese manufacturers have their own app stores or preinstall third-party app stores for the Chinese market. Sometimes it’s a simple case of checking a box to unlock and download Google services, but it’s not always so easy.
Even where Google services are supported, some Chinese phones won’t work properly with certain apps, such as Android Auto. Lack of support can leave you stuck with specific Chinese default apps and services, and many banking apps won’t work as they would on a US or global model.
Advertisement
With regard to Huawei phones in particular, the company developed an independent ecosystem of apps and services following its US ban. The latest models run HarmonyOS. Although it was originally forked from the Android Open Source Project, it is now completely separate, and Huawei phones can no longer run Android apps.
I try to use every smartphone I test as my main phone for at least a week, sometimes longer. I stress-test performance by playing the most demanding mobile games and recording videos at the highest resolution. I make calls to test the smartphone’s microphone and speaker quality.
I often test the camera side by side with a competing phone and analyze the photos on a larger, more color-accurate screen. I’ve been reviewing all kinds of smartphones, from budget devices to flagships, for more than a decade.
In this day and age, it can be a tough sell to convince someone to watch a slow-burning detective series on a streamer when there are so many fast-paced programs vying for your attention. I get it; I do. But sometimes a show comes along that breaks free from the preconceived notions that can come with a genre, while also celebrating it. There’s one series, particularly, that comes to mind that ticks those boxes — and it’s currently streaming its second season on Apple TV.
Sugar stars Oscar and Emmy nominee Colin Farrell as private investigator, John Sugar. On the surface, it looks and operates like a modern-day noir detective show, but something supernatural is happening if you look a bit deeper.
I am going to spoil something about the series right now. It needs to be done if I’m going to discuss the new episodes with you. So, if you’re not caught up on season 1, you’ve been warned.
John Sugar is an alien: a blue extraterrestrial, a bright-eyed being not from this planet. And yep, he still looks better in a suit than I do.
Advertisement
This sci-fi story twist was revealed in 2024, when the show’s first season was brand new. While this creative swing disrupted expectations of the noir genre, it didn’t overshadow the story or the case he was striving to solve in those episodes. It added to it, like icing on a cake that didn’t necessarily need it but benefited from the sweetness nonetheless.
Through the show’s initial run, Sugar was searching for his missing sister, and his need to find her and reconcile that grief fueled his work as a private eye. Season 2 opens by closing that storyline, and follows Sugar, who, after the events of the first season’s finale, is allegedly the only member of his clan left on Earth. Without family or community, Sugar returns to the work that gives him purpose: finding missing people.
His doorway into our culture was movies — old Hollywood black-and-white movies, to be specific — and it’s through that glamorous, dramatic, stylized lens that he sees our world. However, this perception is regularly disrupted by the harsh, violent, brutal realities that accompany his work.
Advertisement
Jin Ha stars as Danny Moon in the second season of Sugar.
Apple TV
Episode 3 drops on Apple TV on Friday, which means Sugar is still very much focused on this season’s missing person case. The man he’s looking for is Ji (Raymond Lee), the criminal-minded brother of a promising boxer, Danny Moon (Jin Ha). His investigation puts Sugar in all sorts of precarious situations, including gang territory, which pivots the series into familiar turf for those who miss shows like The Shield or The Wire.
This tidbit adds a new layer to the series and is a nice reminder that Los Angeles is an important character in the show. Like another LA-based show, The Lincoln Lawyer, Sugar regularly features sequences in which Farrell is dressed to the nines, driving his classic convertible through the city’s streets, where the landscape toggles from tourist-crowded spectacle to crumbling and disheveled wasteland, and back again, much like it does if you drive around these parts regularly — which I do.
Season 1 introduced the voice-over narrative, with Farrell delivering an inner monologue to inform the story. Stylistically, it’s a common tool used in the detective noir genre and could easily plummet the show into cheeseball territory, but it worked in its first run of episodes and continues to be a nice addition in the new episodes.
Advertisement
That shouldn’t be surprising, considering the caliber of actor delivering these lines.
Colin Farrell is magnetic as John Sugar, who is soft-spoken, calculated and stoic. His performance as the alien private eye is the exact opposite of the work he did as Oz Cobb in The Penguin, where he disappeared in the role of the brash, boisterous Gotham City crime boss through heavy prosthetics.
Colin Farrell and Shea Whigham star in Sugar on Apple TV.
Advertisement
Apple TV
His voice-over segments, accompanied by classic film clips featuring a lot of Humphrey Bogart, guide the emotional journey Sugar is on. He’s far from being a human, but he can’t get enough of humanity. The camera work, filled with Dutch angles and other stylistic elements, helps inform the series and pay tribute to the noir genre while also solidifying the notion that John Sugar is a strange man, stuck living a solitary life in a rather strange land.
Heck, I would go so far as to say that John Sugar is kind of how I’d imagine Clark Kent could’ve turned out, if he remained an outcast, fell in love with movies and never decided to put on the Superman costume to share his powers with the world.
Farrell’s Sugar is always watching, observing, fascinated with the people around him. He’s a rudderless being still searching for purpose. So, he works to find humans — which, I suppose, means there’s a conversation that can be had here about how cinema benefits and connects humanity, but I digress.
Advertisement
Laura Donnelly stars in season 2 of Sugar on Apple TV.
Apple TV
Yes, Farrell is the No. 1 reason you should give the show a watch. But the supporting cast is worth your time, too. Shea Whigham’s turn as Sugar’s Big Lebowski-style mentor, Tom, adds a similar energy to Elliott Gould’s in The Lincoln Lawyer. Laura Donnelly’s femme fatale, Charlotte, keeps Sugar on his toes. Sasha Calle brings street smarts as his new assistant, Val, and the always superb Tony Dalton, who is this season’s big bad, Ray Vega, does unnerving work without chewing the scenery.
Trust me, scenery could easily be chewed here, and it’s all so delectible to take in, I assure you. Sugar is a science fiction series that would still fire on all dramatic cylinders if it were solely a brooding detective story. It’s all so good from the writing and cinematography to the steadily increasing emotional stakes and nuanced performances of its cast.
That kind of saving matters most when the phone underneath it still performs like one of Apple’s better cameras, since the iPhone 13 borrows its dual 12-megapixel wide and ultrawide sensors almost directly from the pricier iPhone 12 Pro Max, minus only the optical zoom that most casual shooters rarely use in daily life anyway.
Advertisement
Larger sensors on the iPhone 13 let in noticeably more light than the previous generation, and paired with Sensor Shift stabilisation on the main camera, low light stops being the moment your photos fall apart.
Shooting in dim bars or restaurants becomes one of the iPhone 13’s genuine strengths, since it leans into Night mode more readily than pricier siblings and still turns out detailed, naturally bright results with barely any visible noise creeping in.
None of that would matter as much if the battery couldn’t keep pace, but Apple paired bigger cells with the more efficient A15 Bionic chipset, giving the iPhone 13 real improved endurance over the model it replaced.
Advertisement
The display carries its own quiet upgrade too, with a smaller notch and a brighter OLED panel that hits 800 nits in general use and 1100 nits for HDR video, making outdoor scrolling and map checking noticeably easier on sunny days.
It isn’t without limits, since the screen sticks to a standard 60Hz refresh rate rather than the adaptive ProMotion technology found on Apple’s Pro models, so anyone coming from a faster Android panel may notice the difference in everyday scrolling.
If you’ve been holding onto an older iPhone for years and want a meaningful jump in camera quality and battery life without paying flagship prices, the iPhone 13 at this price is hard to look past right now.
Garmin has expanded its running smartwatch lineup in India with the launch of the new Forerunner 70, Forerunner 170, and Forerunner 170 Music. Aimed at everyone from first-time runners to marathon enthusiasts, the new wearables bring AMOLED displays, Garmin Coach training plans, built-in GPS, smart notifications, safety features, and access to the Garmin Connect ecosystem. They also include Garmin’s adaptive coaching tools, such as Garmin Coach, Training Readiness, Training Status, HRV Status, Recovery Time, and Daily Suggested Workouts, to help runners optimize both training and recovery.
Garmin Forerunner 70 Features
The entry-level Forerunner 70 is designed for beginners who want a dedicated running watch without sacrificing advanced training tools. It features a 1.2-inch AMOLED display, offers up to 13 days of battery life in smartwatch mode, and tracks pace, distance, and wrist-based heart rate.
Despite being the most affordable model in the lineup, Garmin has included several premium metrics such as Running Power, Running Dynamics, Acute Load, Training Effect, and Recovery Time. The watch also supports over 80 sports modes, including cycling, swimming, yoga, strength training, and HIIT. Outside workouts, users can monitor sleep, stress levels, Body Battery energy, and receive the company’s Morning Report with a daily health summary.
The Forerunner 170 and Forerunner 170 Music are designed for more serious runners seeking deeper performance insights. Both watches feature a 1.2-inch AMOLED display, a lightweight 43mm case, and up to 10 days of battery life. The duo builds upon the Forerunner 70 by offering more advanced recovery analysis and training metrics, including Running Dynamics, Running Power, Training Readiness, Training Status, HRV Status, and Acute Load.
Garmin has also included a full suite of health features like all-day heart rate monitoring, Sleep Coach, Body Battery, stress tracking, respiration monitoring, Morning Report, Evening Report, and women’s health tracking. Like the Forerunner 70, both models support more than 80 built-in sports profiles. The biggest difference between the two is that the Forerunner 170 Music lets users download playlists from supported music streaming services directly to the watch, enabling phone-free listening during workouts.
Advertisement
The Garmin Forerunner 70 is priced at ₹32,990 and goes on sale starting July 3. Meanwhile, the Forerunner 170 is priced at ₹39,490, while the Forerunner 170 Music costs ₹45,990. Both models will be available from July 4 through Garmin India’s website, Amazon, and authorized retail stores across the country.
Craft Recordings released the collection on June 12, and yes, we are a few weeks late to the bar. But George Thorogood and the Destroyers are still out playing dates across Europe, the UK, and the U.S., so this is less an archival dust-off than a reminder that the operation remains loud, mobile, and only vaguely interested in behaving itself.
The vinyl edition is not a sprawling career retrospective. It is a tightly edited seven-track set that moves between 1978, 1980, 1982, and 2024, pairing the expected staples with four previously unreleased performances. That structure is the point. “Who Do You Love?” and “One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer” catch the band in its early, hungry phase; “Bad to the Bone” comes from a 1982 Boston performance; and “Born to Be Bad,” recorded in Sarasota in 2024, makes the case that Thorogood has not spent the past four decades quietly becoming a heritage-act wallpaper salesman. You are confusing him with Rod Stewart.
Related Reviews:
Advertisement
For vinyl buyers, this is the compact version of the story: seven songs, no padding, and a sensible emphasis on the band’s central strength. Thorogood’s records have always had their place, but the Destroyers were built for stages, bad lighting, overworked bartenders, and rooms full of people who did not come to hear anything subtle. The expanded CD and digital editions go deeper with 11 tracks, but the LP gets straight to the point with considerably less ceremony.
That matters because The Baddest Show on Earth Tour is still rolling. The band plays Wolverhampton on June 29 and London on June 30 before continuing through Finland, Minnesota, Vermont, and California later this summer and fall. For a catalog built on a handful of songs that have been played hard enough to qualify as public infrastructure, this set is not trying to reinvent George Thorogood. It is simply proving that the engine still starts on the first turn.
The first time I heard George Thorogood was almost certainly over the air in Toronto, probably on Q107, which had been the city’s album-rock station since 1977. It was far more likely to unleash something as greasy and gloriously unvarnished as “Bad to the Bone” than 1050 CHUM’s Top 40 format or 104.5 CHUM-FM. I cannot prove the exact spin all these decades later, but the memory feels right: that riff hitting the speakers, a teenager suddenly convinced that a leather jacket, a pool table, and terrible judgment were a viable life plan.
My other recollection also checks out. “Bad to the Bone” was Barry Champlain’s theme on Oliver Stone’s 1988 Talk Radio, with Eric Bogosian playing the ferociously confrontational talk show host and John C. McGinley as Stu, his DJ and friend. Years before McGinley made a career out of verbally disassembling people as Dr. Cox, he was already standing near a microphone while someone else made the room deeply uncomfortable.
Live albums are hit or miss. Labels and artists rarely choose the worst performance of a best-selling song for release, although anyone with a few shelves of concert records knows that it happens. Selecting the right versions of these tracks was probably not an easy task.
Advertisement
Thorogood and the Destroyers played constantly, often in venues that were less than ideal, but one thing George never did was mail it in. The band understood that the job was to hit the stage hard, make the room move, and leave the audience a little worse for wear. And probably a tad hard in the backseat in the parking lot if they were lucky that night.
And that matters, because not every veteran act can still pull it off. Looking directly at Robert Smith and The Cure, whose Disintegration rehash in New York a few years back was a complete mess. I have seen The Cure five times going back to the 1980s, and that performance was not remotely up to their usual standard. It was a total waste.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
This live set is definitely not a stinker. Thorogood sounds committed, the band is locked in, and the performances still have the kind of loose, barroom danger that made these songs work in the first place.
What it does offer is a clean, detailed, hard-hitting presentation that is noticeably quieter than my older Thorogood records from the period, all of which were purchased at Sam the Record Man in Toronto and have survived more study sessions, moves, and questionable evenings with the boys than they probably deserved. The LP is well centered, the surfaces are quiet, and the new jacket is a clear step up from the thinner, more utilitarian packaging that accompanied a lot of his original releases.
Sonically, it has the right kind of crunch. The guitars bite, the drums have real weight, and the band retains enough rawness to sound like a live George Thorogood record should. It is not audiophile showroom material, but it is far better than a nostalgia cash grab pressed onto noisy vinyl in a flimsy sleeve.
At one point in time web rings were one of the best ways to find content on the World Wide Web — involving not just a directory of participating sites, but also each site linking to each other in a ring-like fashion. With search results these days becoming increasingly less useful, having such a focused resource sounds better and better, with the Warp Point directory and web ring now doing just that for video game websites. Topics range from reviews to retro gaming and game development, so there’s probably something for everyone here.
For the reasoning behind this effort take a look at this article by [Wes Fenlon] and [Matt Sayer]. The inspiration was part nostalgia and part longing for the return of a simple system that Just Works™ without algorithms, advertising, ‘AI’ and corporate overlords involved at any point in time. Everything is just focused on helping you find the content and community you were looking for as quickly as possible, though spending a few hours just clicking through the ring is also perfectly fine.
Everyone is free to submit their own awesome site to Warp Point, after which it’ll be manually reviewed. Even if not strictly curated, it would seem to be a refreshing return to a more simpler time, using an approach that should still hold up just as well as it did in 1999.
Advertisement
Although the big commercial web directories like those on Yahoo! quickly became unwieldy and unusable, there’s a lot to be said for having these small, focused web directories and rings to regain that sense of community and humanity that’s become so scarce on the WWW in 2026.
Code in the latest iOS 27 developer beta describes handling images from a pair of cameras, and hints that these are surely the expected AirPods with cameras.
AirPods with cameras may have long been expected, but the most recent leak claimed that Apple has “suspended” the whole project. Whether it has or not, the device got far enough that there are references to it in the latest iOS 27 developer beta.
/System/Library/AssetsV2/com_apple_MobileAsset_UAF_IF_PlannerOverrides/purpose_auto/9aaa6a204118137235983cc3f1eecae8a125c550.asset/AssetData/PCC/system_prompt_metadata/system_prompt.json seems to hint at some smart glasses codenamed B790 pic.twitter.com/IEmbfleth4
That social media posting from coder Sam Henri Gold posits that the code in the screenshot hints at “smart glasses codenamed B790.”
Advertisement
However, the code segment, called a response template, contains instructions for processing a very specific type of image. It concerns, and only concerns, “two images from cameras on either side of user’s head (left first, right second).”
If it weren’t for that, it could be for some future pair of smart glasses. Or it could as easily be code referring to the Apple Vision Pro.
However, specifying that there are two cameras and they are on either side of the wearer’s head must surely mean that AirPods are more likely. The expected update to the AirPods Pro is believed to contain cameras in the stems of the earbud, arranged to face forward of the wearer.
There are all sorts of issues with this, starting with how these stems would surely need to be at least a little elongated. The stems on the current AirPods Pro are angled so that they only slightly protrude from the ear.
Advertisement
Then there are also concerns about privacy, and how Apple will indicate to people that an AirPods wearer is filming or photographing them.
Nonetheless, there are no other Apple devices that currently exist, or have been rumored. That includes the various future iterations of the Apple Vision Pro or its successors that have been mooted.
There could well be a device that hasn’t leaked yet, or perhaps it’s for a version of AirPods Max with cameras. But it seems certain that this code means AirPods Pro with cameras, which does not mean they are launching soon, but does bolster another recent claim that the devices have been in an advanced stage of testing.
Audio Group Denmark has introduced the Aavik U-301 Unity Amplifier, an all-in-one high-end component that combines a streamer, DAC, preamplifier, and power amplifier in a single chassis. Building on the original U-300 Integrated Amplifier from 2015, the U-301 is designed for listeners who want fewer boxes, fewer cables, and a far cleaner installation without accepting the sonic shortcuts that often come with conventional systems.
That is an increasingly relevant proposition at the upper end of the market. Plenty of high-end buyers still want exceptional sound, but not necessarily a rack full of separates, costly power cords, and enough interconnects to keep a small cable manufacturer in business. The U-301 is intended to preserve signal integrity, timing, low noise, and musical coherence by keeping the critical stages of the signal path under one roof.
Aavik is not a brand built around affordable entry-level products, and the U-301 makes the most sense within Audio Group Denmark’s tightly controlled ecosystem of amplification, streaming, cabling, power management, and loudspeaker partners. For the right buyer, however, that ecosystem approach may be the point: a genuinely high-end system with far less visual clutter and fewer opportunities for the weak link to announce itself.
A Complete High End System in One Chassis
The U-301’s preamp stage gives the one-box design a useful expansion path. Its single RCA preamp output delivers up to 7.5Vrms, with 76 volume steps in 1dB increments and quoted line-stage distortion below 0.005 percent, allowing the U-301 to drive an external power amplifier when more scale or a different amplifier pairing is desired.
Advertisement
U-301 DAC: High Resolution PCM, MQA and Native DSD Support
Aavik’s proprietary DSD-upscaling DAC is not merely a digital convenience feature. The U-301 accepts PCM up to 24-bit/192kHz through BNC S/PDIF and optical inputs, while its USB UAC 2.0 connection supports PCM up to 32-bit/384kHz, MQA, DSD64, and DSD128. That gives the U-301 the format support expected of a serious high-end digital hub, while avoiding the usual pile of external boxes.
U-301 Streaming: A Wired Network First Approach
The U-301’s streaming platform follows Audio Group Denmark’s established ecosystem, using a wired Ethernet connection and the AGD Streaming App for iPad control. Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth are not listed, and Android compatibility has not been indicated, so this is a deliberately focused rather than platform-agnostic approach.
Through the AGD app, users can access TIDAL, Qobuz, Spotify, vTuner internet radio, local music servers, NAS storage, USB hard drives, and USB sticks. Multi-room playback is also supported, allowing compatible AGD devices to be grouped together. It is a capable feature set, but one aimed at buyers comfortable with a wired network and Apple’s iPad ecosystem.
U-301 Amplification: 300 Watts Per Channel from Pascal Class D
The U-301 uses an amplifier stage derived from Aavik’s I-x88 series, built around Pascal Class D technology with high-speed UMAC modulation. Rated at 300 watts per channel into 8 ohms and 600 watts into 4 ohms, it is designed to provide the efficiency, low output impedance, and peak-current capability needed to maintain control over a wide range of loudspeakers.
Advertisement
Mechanical Grounding
To address vibration-related noise, Aavik equips the U-301 with Ansuz Darkz feet, designed to limit the transfer of structure-borne vibration into the chassis. The company also offers optional Darkz resonance-control devices for owners who want to take that approach further.
These accessories use precision mechanical assemblies and hard materials to manage vibration and resonance around the component. It is a distinctly Audio Group Denmark solution: the U-301 is not treated as an isolated amplifier, but as part of a larger ecosystem where mechanical grounding is considered alongside power supply design and electrical noise reduction.
U-301 Design: Scandinavian Minimalism With a Purpose
The U-301 continues Aavik’s restrained Scandinavian design language, combining an aluminum frame, integrated cooling elements, large LCD display, substantial front-mounted control knob, and three integrated pushbuttons. Thick wood-based laminate top and bottom panels add warmth to what could otherwise be a very industrial-looking component.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
The design, created by Flemming Erik Rasmussen, is intended to do more than look expensive on a rack. Aavik says the enclosure also supports resonance control and helps protect the audio circuitry from mechanically induced noise. As Michael Børresen, Audio Group Denmark co-founder and CTO, explains: “The design process of the U-301 felt like a return to Aavik’s origins and our first unity amplifier. With Flemming’s input, the U-301 pays homage to that heritage while clearly pointing toward the future.”
Advertisement
Aavik U-301 Specifications
Aavik Model
U-301
Product Type
Network Preamp/Amplifier and DAC
Price
EUR 15,000 USD 17,000
Line Input
Maximum input 4.5V RMS Input impedance 10kohm
Digital inputs
COAX – S/P-DIF: PCM 24-bit 44-192kHz and MQA
TOSLINK Optical – PCM 24-bit 44-192kHz and MQA
USB UAC 2 -PCM 32-bit 44-384kHz, MQA, DSD64, DSD128
Network Connectivity
Ethernet
Preamp Output
1 pair of RCA outputs
Speaker Connections
2 x Binding Posts
Max output
7.5Vrms
Distortion Line Stage
<0.005% (THD at 1kHz, 1V input)
Volume Control
76 x 1dB steps
Power Output
2x 300W into 8Ω
Distortion
<0.0028% (1W, 1kHz, 8Ω)
IMD (Intermodulation Distortion)
<0.0008% (10W, 8Ω)
TIM (Transient Intermodulation Distortion)
<0.002% (10W, 8Ω)
Control
RS232, 12Volt Trigger Out
Dimensions (HxWxD)
4.25 x 16.46 x 16.93 in (10.8 x 41.8 x 43 cm)
Weight
23.1 lbs (10.5 kg)
The Bottom Line
The Aavik U-301 is not attempting to make $17,000 sound sensible to everyone. It is a serious one-box solution for buyers who want high-end streaming, digital conversion, preamplification, and 300 watts per channel without a rack full of components, cable clutter, and the usual matching exercise that accompanies separates.
Its real advancement over the original U-300 is not greater amplifier output, but a more streaming-focused architecture built around Aavik’s newer I-x88-derived Class D platform, resonant-mode power supply, and the broader Audio Group Denmark approach to electrical and mechanical noise control. The U-301 is a tightly integrated high-end system rather than a conventional integrated amplifier with a DAC bolted onto the side.
Advertisement
The glaring omission is the lack of a built-in phono stage. The U-300 offered one, while vinyl listeners considering the U-301 will need an external phono preamp, another cable, and another box. That rather undermines the “just add speakers” pitch for anyone with a turntable, although it does create an obvious path toward Aavik’s dedicated R-Series phono stages.
The U-301 will make the most sense for a streaming-first, two-channel listener who wants fewer boxes without stepping down into lifestyle-audio territory. It is not the connectivity equivalent of a Swiss Army knife, and the published materials do not position it as one. But for buyers committed to the Audio Group Denmark ecosystem and willing to pay for Danish engineering, design, and a very specific approach to system integration, the U-301 looks like one of the more ambitious all-in-one amplifiers available.
Adrian Hill’s highly effective vaccine exceeded the World Health Organization’s protection targets of 75pc to 80pc in clinical trials.
Ireland’s Adrian Hill has received the European Patent Office’s European Inventor Award 2026 in the research category for his work developing the R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine.
The highly effective vaccine achieved roughly 80pc protection in clinical trials, exceeding even World Health Organization (WHO) targets of 75pc.
Designed for large-scale deployment in lower-income countries, the awarding body noted, the vaccine created by Hill and his team presents more of the malaria-specific protein regions needed to trigger a strong immune response, which offers significantly more protection against the disease than traditional vaccines.
Advertisement
It costs less than €3 to make per dose and can remain stable for up to two years under standard refrigeration conditions, helping make vaccination programmes more accessible in regions where malaria remains endemic, according to the European Patent Office.
Commenting on the win, Hill said, “I am delighted to accept this prestigious award on behalf of the many hundreds of people who have contributed to the discovery, development and licensure of our malaria vaccine over the past 12 years.”
Hill’s commitment to malaria research began in Gambia in 1988 when he witnessed the impact the illness can have, particularly on young children. According to the WHO, in 2024 there were 282m cases of malaria causing roughly 610,000 deaths globally. Three-quarters of those reported deaths were in Africa-based children under five.
The project brought together partners including the University of Oxford, the Serum Institute of India, Novavax, and leading African research centres in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Mali and Tanzania.
Advertisement
The awards show was held in Berlin; other inventors competing with Hill included Portuguese research finalist Paula Videira and her team, who were nominated for a high-precision antibody that distinguishes cancer cells from healthy tissue.
Finnish physicist Mikko Möttönen was considered for his work developing an ultrasensitive cryogenic microwave sensor that aims to improve quantum computing hardware.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Focal has expanded its Utopia loudspeaker range with the Scala Utopia Evo M, a French-built loudspeaker that introduces the brand’s newest PRISM tweeter and M-profile midrange technology to the model line.
That model line retains the three-way architecture that made the original Scala Utopia successful, with Focal integrating engineering advances from its most recent speaker developments across the entire updated design.
The M-profile midrange driver arrives directly from Focal’s professional Utopia Main range, and combines a sandwich-structured W cone with a one-piece M-profile geometry that guarantees exceptional rigidity and an ultra-linear frequency response.
That linear response translates into a midrange that Focal says sounds significantly more transparent, precise and natural than the previous Scala Utopia, a shift the brand attributes directly to the new cone geometry.
Advertisement
Focal pairs that new midrange with the PRISM tweeter, a high-frequency driver that first appeared on the flagship Diva Alta Utopia and now makes its debut on the smaller Scala range for the first time.
Advertisement
That tweeter relies on a multi-material cone built through an advanced micro-structuring process, a construction that Focal states achieves greater rigidity than beryllium while keeping an optimum balance between lightness and damping.
Combined with Focal’s Infinite Acoustic Loading technology, the PRISM tweeter delivers treble reproduction the company describes as unusually pure, finely detailed and extended further across the upper frequency range than previous Utopia tweeters.
Advertisement
Beyond the tweeter and midrange updates, Focal retains its established TMD suspension system, which limits cone deformation and reduces distortion to preserve both dynamics and overall sound definition across the speaker’s frequency range.
That frequency range extends further at the low end thanks to a completely redesigned W woofer, which uses a dual-ferrite motor to produce powerful, deep and controlled bass suited to contemporary music production.
Focal complements that low-end output with its OPC+ Optimum Phase Crossover technology, which allows precise adjustment of bass and treble, alongside Gamma and Focus Time technologies that guarantee exemplary temporal consistency and mechanical stability.
Advertisement
Advertisement
French craftsmanship and design
Focal builds the speaker entirely in France, with cabinet-makers in Burgundy producing the wooden enclosure and the brand’s acoustic workshops in Saint-Étienne responsible for the drivers, a level of control covering its patented PRISM technology.
Choices of finishes include lacquer or wood finishes.
Focal has confirmed pricing for the Scala Utopia Evo M at €40,000, approximately £34,200, per pair in a lacquered finish or $46,000.
Focal has not confirmed a UK release date for the Scala Utopia Evo M, though the speaker is expected to reach Focal Powered by Naim stores as part of the brand’s Utopia range rollout.
For those growing sick of Earth’s geopolitics, NASA is looking for volunteers to spend a year living and working in isolated conditions in preparation for a journey to some other celestial orb.
The US space agency is set to carry out a simulated deep space mission from no earlier than August 2027 to understand what might happen to its human lab rats during planned crewed missions to the Moon or Mars.
Advertisement
Johnson Space Center in Houston will be home to the willing participants who are set for a yearlong Moon and Mars Exploration Analog experience designed to help keep potential space travelers safe and mission-ready during future stays on the Red Planet or Earth’s natural satellite. The simulation could also inform plans for a sustained lunar presence through the agency’s Moon Base and future Artemis missions.
The “experience” will take place in two confined habitats. The NASA notice does not say whether there will be outside comms, but specifies physical and educational requirements, as well as a willingness to take part in a multi-day selection process and pass a psychological assessment.
“Candidates also should have a strong desire for unique, rewarding experiences, and interest in contributing to NASA’s work to prepare for extended stays on the lunar surface and the first crewed mission to Mars,” the notice says.
Given the state of affairs, there may well be a flood of applicants who feel skipping a year would be well worth the inevitable curbs on their freedoms.
Advertisement
Nonetheless, they may wonder about the world they will emerge to find when the experiment ends. Will WWE star Cody Rhodes be running for president, given the recent showcase on the White House lawn? Anything is possible in a world that shows an unnerving resemblance to Mike Judge’s 2006 Idiocracy.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login