Acasis FlowCore Series introduces an independent bandwidth design for each NVMe bay system
Each drive reportedly maintains full Thunderbolt 5 speed simultaneously
Four-bay and ten-bay models target different storage capacity needs
Acasis has announced the FlowCore Series, a new line of Thunderbolt storage systems.
This device claims to solve the shared bandwidth problem of conventional multi-bay storage devices — where multiple drives operating simultaneously cause significant slowdowns — by offering an independent full-speed bandwidth architecture for each M.2 NVMe bay
Each bay can access nearly the full 80 Gbps of Thunderbolt 5 bandwidth without the usual speed reductions.
Latest Videos From
Advertisement
Per-bay bandwidth architecture
Acasis says the system achieved sustained read and write speeds exceeding 6,000 MB per second per drive.
This lineup includes three distinct models tailored to various user requirements and budgets.
The TB504 is a 4-bay Standard Edition designed for mainstream professional workloads, while the Pro model offers 10 bays in a Professional Edition for large-scale storage demands.
The TB504 Air offers a 40 Gbps Entry-Level Edition for users who do not require maximum Thunderbolt 5 speeds.
Advertisement
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
While the TB504 supports up to 32 TB of total storage capacity for growing datasets, the TB504 Pro can hold up to 80 TB for production archives and high-resolution media libraries.
All models support M.2 NVMe SSDs in 2230, 2242, 2260, and 2280 form factors for broad compatibility.
The FlowCore Series uses a CNC-machined full aluminium alloy chassis with large passive cooling fins.
Advertisement
This fanless design enables completely silent operation for noise-sensitive professional spaces.
Studios, editing suites, offices, and AI workstations can benefit from this quiet thermal management approach.
The system includes downstream 80 Gbps Thunderbolt 5 expansion ports for building integrated workstation setups.
Advertisement
Users can connect high-resolution dual 8K at 60 Hz monitors directly through the storage device.
This device supports RAID configurations, including RAID 0 for maximum performance and RAID 1 for data protection.
It also supports RAID 10 and large-volume storage configurations for additional flexibility for specific workflow requirements.
Advertisement
AI and high-load workload support
The system supports demanding applications like local LLM deployment for 70B and 405B parameter models.
Multi-stream 8K RAW video editing and dataset preprocessing are also within the claimed capabilities of this hardware.
Whether the independent bandwidth architecture performs as advertised under sustained professional workloads remains to be verified by independent reviewers.
The company will launch this product through a Kickstarter crowdfunding campaign beginning on May 15, 2026.
Advertisement
The gap between crowdfunding promises and shipping products has historically been quite wide for complex hardware like this.
Disclaimer: We do not recommend or endorse any crowdfunding project. All crowdfunding campaigns carry inherent risks, including the possibility of delays, changes, or non-delivery of products. Potential backers should carefully evaluate the details and proceed at their own discretion.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
JLab JBuds Open Wireless: Two-minute review
JLab is well-known for its affordable headphones and earbuds, but this time the brand is branching out into something more unusual.
The JBuds Open Wireless are over-ear headphones designed to allow you to hear the world around you. Yes, everyone is doing that right now, just take a look at our best open earbuds guide — but while most open-ear options are earbuds, JLab has made an over-ear version. It promises to deliver the same open benefits but from a bigger — and for some people, more comfortable — form factor.
Advertisement
Now, open-back headphones are nothing new. They’re actually a firm favorite among audiophiles. That’s because venting the back of the driver housing stops sound from bouncing back onto the driver itself, which gives you a cleaner and more accurate sound with a wider, more natural soundstage.
Latest Videos From
However, the JBuds Open Wireless aren’t that. Sure, they look similar, but the “open” part here means something different. The earcups don’t create a strong seal against your head, and the cups can have grilles over them or the option to be completely open, so ambient sound outside flows freely in alongside your music.
So it’s not open-back as an audio engineering choice, but more open-ear as a lifestyle one, where the goal isn’t better sound quality but a mix of sound and awareness of what’s happening around you.
Interestingly, this design might seem new but it’s been done before several times. One of my favorite examples is back in the late ’90s when Sony released the MDR-F1 — not identical, but similar open or open-air headphones, and people referred to them as “earspeakers” at the time. This is a similar thing, and a few other brands have done it, such as the ONE Wireless Open-Ear Headphones from nwm.
Advertisement
But they’re still unusual right now, and I can’t work out if they’re uncommon because they’re about to appeal to everyone and we’ll see more soon, or because the use case is so specific that plenty of people will love the idea but find it falls apart in practice. Unfortunately, I’m in the second camp.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to like here. The design is genuinely cool, with removable grilles and a comfortable all-day fit thanks to some memory foam padding in the cups and band. The sound also delivers more bass than I’d expect from an open design. And the ambient awareness really works. In quiet environments, it’s really nice to listen with them.
But add just a bit of background chatter or noise and the openness becomes the problem. There are just too many competing sounds and the experience collapses. I know what you’re thinking. Isn’t that the whole point of open-ear designs? Sure, but if the music you’ve bought them to listen to becomes unlistenable, then we’ve got a problem.
Advertisement
At under $100/£100, the risk still feels low. But I think the use case is narrow, and most people will know within a day whether these are for them.
JLab JBuds Open Wireless review: Price and release date
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
Released in late 2025
Priced at $99.99 / £99.99 / AU$199.99
After being unveiled at IFA 2025 in September of 2025, the JLab JBuds Open Wireless headphones were launched in some markets in late 2025, and then the rest in early 2026.
You can buy the JBuds Open for $99.99 / £99.99 / AU$199.99. That price means they sit somewhere between the higher end of budget and mid-range.
Now this is where I’d usually give you context of how they compare to similar products, but it’s tricky to compare these headphones directly to anything else right now. They give you the benefits of open-ear styles, but those are mostly buds, and these still look and feel like over-ears.
Advertisement
In that case, let’s look at the open-ear buds you can get right now. Like the Shokz OpenFit 2+, our current top pick, which are $179.95 / £169. Though you can get much more affordable open buds that still sound good, like the Earfun Clip 2 with a clip-on design that’ll cost you $79.99 / £69.99 (about AU$120).
In terms of over-ears, one of our favorite budget picks is the OneOdio Focus A6 over-ears at $55 / £55 / AU$112, which we think sound fantastic for the price. Though at that higher end of the budget range you’ve got plenty of choice, like the very highly rated 1More Sonoflow Pro HQ51 at $89 / £99 / AU$130.
Although there’s nothing to strictly compare them to, the price reflects what you’re getting. Which is over-ear comfort and build with open-ear awareness in a form factor that doesn’t really exist elsewhere. For under $100 / £100, that does seem like a fair ask. But whether it’s worth it comes down entirely to your preferences, which we’ll get into.
Advertisement
JLab JBuds Open Wireless review: Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Drivers
35mm and 12mm Coaxial Dynamic Drivers
Active noise cancellation
No
Advertisement
Battery life (ANC off)
Up to 24 hours
Weight
245g
Advertisement
Connectivity
Bluetooth 6.0, USB-C
Frequency response
20-20 kHz
Advertisement
Waterproofing
None
JLab JBuds Open Wireless review: Features
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
Simple app with essentials
Multipoint connectivity
24 hours battery life (well, nearly)
The JLab JBuds Open aren’t overflowing with features, but you have everything you need for the price here.
The app is basic, but that’s not a criticism. I found it easy to use and it covers the essentials well. You can customize the manual buttons on the right earcup, check battery life, set an interval timer, toggle spatial audio on/off, and switch between music and movie modes.
Advertisement
There’s also a 10-band custom EQ alongside three presets, which I enjoyed playing with to try and address some of the issues with the sound, more on that later.
The headphones have dual coaxial drivers onboard, a 35mm and a 12mm unit, and Bluetooth 6.0 connectivity with support for SBC and AAC codecs. There’s no wireless hi-res audio options, but a USB-C cable is included if you want a wired connection.
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
Multipoint connectivity to two devices worked seamlessly during my testing, switching cleanly between my laptop and phone while I was working.
Battery life is rated at 24 hours, though in some of JLab’s specs it says to expect 18 hours. In my testing I got around 20 hours, with a full recharge taking roughly 2.5 to 3 hours.
Advertisement
That’s not bad, but it does lag behind other over-ear headphones. The Sony WH-1000XM6 manages 30 hours, and the cheaper 1More Sonoflow Pro HQ51 headphones deliver an extraordinary 65 hours with ANC on. But, to be fair, it’s much harder to fit batteries in when you’ve removed all the physical space from your headphones…
Measured against open-ear buds, this amount is impressive as the Shokz OpenFit 2+ only manages 11 hours, but that’s expected given the size difference.
JLab JBuds Open Wireless review: Sound quality
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
Better bass than most open options but sub-bass is lacking
Wide soundstage suits big, orchestral tracks
Sound leakage is an issue
With the JLab JBuds Open headphones, you can obviously hear your surroundings — that’s the whole point. But you’re going to want to bear that in mind, because these sound really open. Like, really open.
On a long quiet walk along the canal, it was lovely. I had music playing, I could hear bike bells and birds and I felt very happy. But walking through the city was a different experience entirely.
Advertisement
What I was hearing from the headphones was competing for my attention with a fire alarm, other music, and general chatter. There’s open-ear, which I’ve tried many times now from different brands, and then there’s this.
And some people might genuinely want this. If ambient awareness always trumps music for you, and competing sounds don’t overwhelm you, these could be ideal. That’s subjective and worth acknowledging, but it wasn’t my experience.
The reason it’s so pronounced is physical, because the drivers sit further from your ear than other open options. They’re outside the ear rather than in the concha, where other open buds sit. Sealed over-ears obviously don’t have the problem at all.
Here it’s essentially like holding a speaker close to your ear. I recommending testing adding the grilles in and out, because they do reduce the sound leakage in, and they’re very easy to remove.
Advertisement
With dual coaxial 35mm and 12mm drivers, they’re working with bigger hardware than most open-ear buds, and you can really tell when you listen. There’s genuine presence in the low end, with far more bass and substance than you’d typically expect from a pair of open-ear buds.
Vocals come through clearly, and the wide soundstage is a real strength here. I spent a lot of time listening to Jóhann Jóhannsson’s Arrival score and instrument separation was impressive. Big, cinematic or orchestral tracks have a sense of space that genuinely suits the open design.
Moving onto Rolling Stones’ Sympathy for the Devil and the track’s swagger and drive translated well. It felt wide, punchy and instruments were given plenty of room.
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
But there are weaknesses. Sub-bass is mostly absent. Hi-hats and cymbals also had a tendency to tip into shrill territory, and kick drums have a sharp, thin quality rather than a satisfying thud.
Advertisement
The overall character skews mid-heavy, and you’ll find yourself pushing the volume higher than expected to get a sense of immersion.
At times it felt a bit like hearing your phone playing in front of you; it’s present and clear enough, but thin and lacking warmth. The bass boost EQ setting helps on the right tracks and is worth trialling, but it can’t resolve the main limitation here which is that there’s no seal to trap and focus the sound.
Calls were fine. With open ears, conversations feel more natural to me, and the noise-cancelling mic picked up my voice well. It lacked some clarity at times, but was fine for most purposes.
Sound leakage from the headphones is also worth flagging. I recorded audio on my phone while wearing them and could make out the track even at a moderate volume with the grilles on. If you remove them, it gets noticeably worse.
Advertisement
Push the volume up, which you will find yourself doing, and it gets worse still. So there’s a sort of irony here, which is that the open design means you need more volume to feel the music, but more volume means more leakage.
Ambient noise outside will mask the leakage, so you’ll get away with it way more in public than you might expect. But a quiet office or commute is going to be a different story.
JLab JBuds Open Wireless review: Design
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
A bold design that may divide people
Genuinely comfortable for long wear
Removable grilles change the look and the sound
The JLab JBuds Open headphones have a very unusual design and I think they’ll divide people. Some will find them incredibly cool and a bit sci-fi looking, whereas others just won’t get on with them.
They’re over-ear headphones with a build that feels substantial, though they do feel a little more cheap and plasticky than something like the Bose QuietComfort Headphones, my all-time favorite over-ears, but that’s to be expected at this lower price.
Advertisement
Both the earcups and headband are padded with memory foam and I found it genuinely comfortable for long sessions. The clamping force was occasionally a little much when I was working indoors, but on runs outside it actually helped and kept them feeling secure.
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
At 245g, they’re light, and you can shave a couple of grams off by removing the metal grilles. The earcups have a sort of wheel-spoke pattern with a grille sitting over under it. And if you twist the cup, the grille pops out cleanly, opening things up even more both in how these headphones look and sound.
I noticed it really changes the look of them, and noticeably affects how much ambient sound comes through. It’s a small but genuinely fun customization option.
That said, they’re bulky. They stick out from your head considerably more than most modern over-ears nowadays, and while the cups pivot flat, they don’t fold inward either, which makes them less practical to carry and store than many rivals.
Advertisement
The included carry case is a nice touch. It’s a similar concept to the AirPods Max case but it’s more practical with more coverage of the headphones. The matte, brushed finish picks up marks easily though.
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
You control the JBuds Open with physical buttons on the side of the right earcup. I personally prefer physical buttons over touch controls, and found these easy to locate and use on the move, and they’re also customizable via the app.
The headphones come in black, which is the pair I tested here, or Cloud, which is a light gray with gold accents that’s a nice option if you’re sick of all black tech.
There’s no IP rating here, which on paper suggests avoiding sweaty workouts when you’re wearing them. But given their open design means far more airflow than a sealed pair, I’d argue they’re pretty workout-friendly as long as you’re mindful about sweat and splashes.
Advertisement
I tested them on several runs without any problems and actually really enjoyed the ambient awareness and added airflow as I got warmer and more tired. But I maybe wouldn’t risk them in the rain.
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
JLab JBuds Open Wireless review: Value
Good value compared to open-ear buds
But whether it’s worth it depends on your feelings about ambient sound
These are good value compared to other over-ear headphones and even some open-ear options. You can pick up open-ear buds for well under $100 / £100 these days, but top performers like the Shokz OpenFit 2+ cost nearly double at $179 / £169. So if you specifically want open-ear audio on a budget, they’re worth considering.
But really, whether these are worth it has less to do with price and more to do with your lifestyle. Under $100 / £100 feels fair for what’s here. But if you’re going to struggle to hear your music in most environments or find the bulk doesn’t suit you, the price won’t save them.
For the right person though, which I think will be someone who prioritizes awareness, loves the over-ear form factor, and isn’t chasing audiophile sound, then these were essentially made for you.
Advertisement
Should I buy the JLab JBuds Open Wireless?
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
Swipe to scroll horizontally
JLab JBuds Open Wireless score card
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Advertisement
Features
The app is easy-to-use, and it’s nice to get multipoint connectivity and a USB-C option.
3.5 / 5
Sound quality
Advertisement
Good for an open design, especially for bass. But it’s hard to hear your music in anything other than a quiet environment, and sound leaks out, too.
3.5 / 5
Design
They’re comfortable enough for all-day listening thanks to their memory foam. The design is chunky and divisive but I like that you can switch the grilles in and out.
Advertisement
4 / 5
Value
Good sound, features and design for the money, but whether it’s good value for you or not is an entirely different story. It’ll be a really subjective thing for these.
3.5 / 5
Advertisement
Buy them if…
Don’t buy them if…
JLab JBuds Open Wireless review: Also consider
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell – Column 0
Jlab Jbuds Open Headphones
Advertisement
1More Sonoflow Pro HQ51
Earfun Clip 2
Drivers
35mm and 12mm coaxial dynamic drivers
Advertisement
40mm dynamic
12mm dual-magnetic titanium composite driver
Active noise cancellation
No
Advertisement
Yes
No
Battery life (ANC on)
Up to 24 hours
Advertisement
60 hours (ANC on), 100 hours (ANC off)
11 hours
Weight
245g
Advertisement
246g
5.5g
Connectivity
Bluetooth 6.0, USB-C
Advertisement
Bluetooth 5.4, 3.5mm
Bluetooth 6.0
Waterproofing
None
Advertisement
None
IP55
How I tested the JLab JBuds Open Wireless
(Image credit: Future / Becca Caddy)
Tested over 10 days
Used with my iPhone 16 Pro
Listened to music, podcasts and some movies
I tested the JLab JBuds Open Ear Headphones for 10 days, which gave me plenty of time to trial them in different environments, wear them in a few different weather conditions and run a battery test.
I took them with me on daily long walks and two runs along the canalside, as well as one bigger hike in the countryside. They also came with me often when I was walking through a big city, in a busy market, to plenty of coffee shops while I was working remotely, on several bus rides and just out and about getting on with my day more generally.
Advertisement
I used my iPhone 16 Pro to test them and mostly listened to music and podcasts. I also used them when watching a couple of movies to test the movie preset and the spatial audio. I tested the different modes and EQ settings and used them with and without their grilles.
I actually became really fascinated by the subtle sound differences when it came to the grilles, so know my experience in this review comes from a lot of careful listening.
I’ve been writing about and testing tech for more than 15 years now. I’ve focused mainly on wearables, smart home devices and a lot of audio tech. Over the past few years I’ve been testing a lot of open ear buds, so I know what I’m looking (and listening out) for.
I’m always keen to think about the real world use cases and everyday practicality of tech so you get your money’s worth and pick the best device for you.
The JBL Tune 730BT is a no-frills wireless over-ear that nails the budget brief. There’s no noise cancelling and no spatial trickery, but you do get JBL Pure Bass Sound, Bluetooth 6.0 with Multipoint, crazy good 76-hour battery life, a foldable design and reliable two-mic call quality. At £39.99, the 730BT is one of the easiest budget recommendations going, provided you’re happy to live without ANC. For students, second-pair buyers and anyone who just wants to plug in and listen, there’s considerable value for money
76-hour battery life is exceptional
Solid Pure Bass Sound
Custom EQ plus six presets
Foldable, lightweight build
Relax mode with ambient sounds
No active noise cancelling
Plastic build is unmistakably budget
No charging cable in the box
No 3.5mm wired option
Key Features
Advertisement
Audio
JBL Pure Bass Sound with 40mm dynamic drivers
Advertisement
Wireless
Bluetooth 6.0 with Multipoint, Fast Pair and Swift Pair
Advertisement
Calls
Two beamforming mics for hands-free calls
Introduction
There are two ways to do budget wireless headphones. You can build a glossy facsimile of a flagship and hope nobody notices the missing features, or you can pick three or four things to do well, leave the rest off the spec sheet and price the result accordingly. The JBL Tune 730BT belongs to the second school.
Advertisement
At £39.99, the Tune 730BT is an entry point into JBL’s revamped Tune line-up. There’s no noise cancelling, no Spatial Sound, no Hi-Res, no cable in the box. What you get instead is headline JBL Pure Bass tuning, Bluetooth 6.0, the same generous 76-hour battery life as the 780NC, Multipoint and a foldable design.
It’s a familiar JBL formula, refined for the post-Bluetooth LE Audio era. The question is whether the 730BT does enough to justify a place in the increasingly crowded budget wireless category, and whether anyone should still bother with ANC-free headphones in 2026.
Advertisement
Design
Familiar JBL silhouette
Lightweight and foldable
Four colourways
Pull the Tune 730BT out of the box, and the family resemblance is immediate. JBL has applied the same design language as the rest of the new Tune range: smooth polycarbonate cups with the JBL logo embossed on each side, a slim padded headband, soft polyurethane leatherette earpads and minimal external branding.
Build is plastic, as you’d expect at the price, but it doesn’t feel cheap in hand. There’s no creak from the headband, the hinges fold cleanly without protesting, and the 218g weight is well-judged for a £39.99 over-ear. Compared to a Sony WH-CH520 or Sennheiser Accentum Wireless, the 730BT feels comparable.
Advertisement
Without ANC, you’re relying on passive isolation; fortunately, it’s impressive even if the screech of the London Underground inevitably finds its way through. For office use or home work when you need to focus, the 730BT is up to the task, even with the washing machine at full tilt and within earshot.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
Controls are physical buttons on the right earcup – power, Bluetooth pairing and volume – plus a USB-C charging port on the same side. There’s no 3.5mm jack, which is the most obvious omission for wired revivalists. There’s no charging cable or carry case, but you do get a rudimentary fabric pouch to keep the dust off.
Comfort is a no-grumbles good. The earpads are deep enough that the drivers sit clear of the ears, the clamping force is light without losing the seal, and a long working day passes without the temple-ache that some glasses-wearers get from heavier rivals.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The headband padding could be a touch more substantial, but it’s a minor gripe as the 730BT are one of the more comfortable budget over-ears I’ve tested, with only moderate heat build-up
Four colours are offered: Black, Blue, Beige and White. None shouts ‘budget headphone’.
Advertisement
Battery Life
76-hour quoted playback
Speed-charge support
USB-C charging in two hours
Advertisement
JBL quotes up to 76 hours of playtime on Bluetooth, and that figure holds up well in real-world use at moderate volumes. Across a week of mixed commuting, video calls and music listening, the headphones registered a charge cycle every 9 to 11 days.
Standby drain is minimal, which is the difference between a 76-hour spec and a 76-hour reality.
A 5-minute speed charge delivers five hours of playback. A full charge from flat takes about two hours over USB-C.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Talk time is quoted at up to 45 hours, which is fairly generous. There’s no power-bank function, no wireless charging and no quick-charge LED indicator; you charge it from flat, you forget about it, you charge it again.
Remember, JBL hasn’t shipped a USB-C cable in the box. A mild annoyance for anyone migrating from older Lightning or Micro-USB hardware.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Features
Bluetooth 6.0 with Multipoint
Three EQ presets in the JBL Headphones app
Two beamforming mics
Bluetooth 6.0 is a notable upgrade over the Tune 720BT, and it brings two practical benefits: lower power consumption and reduced latency for video. In testing, the 730BT held a stable connection across a flat with the bedroom door shut, and audio stayed in sync during back-to-back YouTube clips and Netflix episodes.
Multipoint is the more useful addition. The 730BT can stay paired with two devices simultaneously and switches automatically between them when audio is requested.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Pause an Apple Music playlist on your phone, accept a Teams call on the laptop, and the headphones follow without intervention, something that shouldn’t be sniffed at on £39.99 headphones. Google Fast Pair and Microsoft Swift Pair handle initial pairing on Android and Windows, respectively.
The JBL Headphones app offers some interesting features, including smart audio and video modes to support your content. This becomes disabled when LE Audio mode is enabled. EQ presets are equally imaginative. Choose from Studio, Bass, Club, Extreme Bass, Vocal, or Jazz, with Studio set to default. Alternatively, there’s custom EQ functionality.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Relax mode is a small but thoughtful extra where you can build up to five custom mixes from a library of ambient sounds (rain, waves, white noise and the like), with a sliding bar that sets a timer for how long the mix plays. You can overlay sounds, too, although the result is more tsunami than Serengeti.
Two beamforming mics handle calls. Each earcup carries one mic, and the array is tuned to focus on the wearer’s voice while suppressing background noise. The performance is clear in quiet environments, decent on a windless street and patchy in busier ones.
Sound Quality
Warm, bass-led JBL Pure Bass tuning
Vocals sit forward in the mix
Treble too bright at high volumes
JBL Pure Bass is exactly what it sounds like: a low-end-led tuning that wants you to feel a kick drum more than count the cymbals. It suits modern pop, hip-hop, electronic and rock, and the 730BT delivers it competently. Run anything off Apple Music’s infectious Loops electronic playlist with the Studio preset, and the bass has weight without going boomy.
The Club preset provides an able alternative if the weekend really has landed, while Bass and Extreme Bass feel unnecessary and are best avoided unless you’re a complete heathen. Dip into Vocal or Jazz for more sedate listening habits, from the Sades et al of this world.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
What surprises is the midrange. Bass is ever-present, but the 730BT keeps vocals forward enough that podcasts and audiobooks come through clearly, and even the intricacies of a fingerpicked guitar get time in the limelight.
Treble is the area most exposed to the budget. At low and moderate volumes, it’s clean and crisp; push past 80 per cent, and things become prickly. The Vocal EQ preset partly tames it; the Studio preset tolerates moderate volumes best. The overall soundstage is small, as it is with most closed-back budget headphones. Don’t expect spatial scale; do expect a focused, energetic presentation that flatters most modern production.
Advertisement
Should you buy it?
I like a bassy bang for my buck
If you want long battery life, easy multipoint and competent JBL bass for £40, the Tune 730BT is an obvious pick
Advertisement
I’ve booked a Jet2 holiday
A pair of JBL noise cancellers doesn’t cost that much more, and if you’re set on travelling, you’ll want the extra isolation.
Advertisement
Final Thoughts
JBL has resisted the temptation to plaster the Tune 730BT spec sheet with features that wouldn’t survive the price, and instead focused on the basics that matter: comfort, battery life, connectivity, and tuning that suits the music most people listen to.
The 76 hours of playtime alone are enough to make this one worth the £39.99. Throw in Bluetooth 6.0 with Multipoint, foldable build, a custom EQ and six presets, Relax mode and Fast Pair on Android, and the 730BT comfortably outpaces what budget over-ears looked like even two years ago.
Advertisement
Compromises are clearly signposted. There’s no ANC, no 3.5mm jack and no cable in the box. If any of those matter, the JBL Tune 780NC offers Adaptive ANC, Spatial Sound and a Hi-Res cable for £120, even if it’s going to eat into your Benidorm cocktail budget.
If you want a clean, comfortable, capable wireless headphone at a properly affordable price, you’re on safe ground here. Nevertheless, check out our best cheap headphones round-up for further choice.
Advertisement
How We Test
I tested the JBL Tune 730BT using them as a daily commuter pair, a home-office headphone for video calls, and a casual everyday-listening option around the house.
Advertisement
Music testing covered electronic, hip-hop, classical and acoustic singer-songwriter material, streamed primarily over Bluetooth from an iPhone 16e via Apple Music, with additional testing on a MacBook Air for Multipoint behaviour.
Battery life was assessed across a full discharge cycle from a full charge, with mixed Bluetooth and call use throughout.
On commutes
At a desk
Over a full charge cycle
FAQs
What’s the difference between the JBL Tune 720BT and Tune 730BT?
The 730BT upgrades to Bluetooth 6.0 with LC3 codec support, adds Google Fast Pair and improves the dual-mic call array. Battery life remains class-leading at 76 hours.
Advertisement
Can the JBL Tune 730BT be used wired?
No. The 730BT is wireless-only. There is no 3.5mm jack, and the included USB-C port is for charging only — there is no wired Hi-Res audio mode.
American-born, Ireland-based fund manager Faye Walsh Drouillard talks conviction, climate tech and what it takes to build an impact VC fund from scratch.
When Faye Walsh Drouillard sought out an impact-focused venture capital fund in Ireland, she looked at the market and could not find a structure that matched her vision. So she built one herself.
That instinct – to identify the gap and move – speaks to someone who has spent two decades operating at the intersection of purpose and capital. Born in Washington DC and raised in DC and California, Walsh Drouillard has lived in Europe for 20 years, 12 of them in Ireland, where she arrived initially due to her husband’s work in aircraft leasing. What began as a relocation for family reasons has, over time, become a genuine commitment to the Irish ecosystem and the founders building within it.
Her background is that of a social entrepreneur with deep roots in the nonprofit world and a long-standing preoccupation with two of the defining challenges of our time: climate change and inequality. Long before WakeUp Capital existed, she was active in angel investing, serving on non-profit boards and, increasingly, asking a question she found difficult to answer: where was the fund for founders building solutions to these problems?
Advertisement
“I didn’t see anything here in the Irish market that was focused on those themes,” says Walsh Drouillard. “And I also felt like those themes, particularly the climate side, were going to become more and more important to the global economy, and certainly within Ireland.”
“I like to build. I like to create, and I brought an entrepreneurial approach to building the fund. Joining an existing fund to try to do that work probably wasn’t the right fit – it would probably not have worked out for anyone. I wasn’t going to wait for someone to tap me on the shoulder.”
A winding path
The seed of WakeUp Capital was planted in 2019, when Walsh Drouillard – then working in the angel investing world – made clear to a syndicate her interest in climate-tech opportunities. It was there she met Mark Peters, who at the time was at Google, and who would become her co-founder. Together, they spent the years that followed conducting market research, making four early investments across Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK, and laying the foundations of what would become a dedicated VC fund.
It was not, she acknowledges, a straightforward path. Building a first-time fund is challenging for anyone and especially for an outsider. Building one as a female general partner in venture capital adds a layer of difficulty that Walsh Drouillard is candid about. What got her through, she says, was a combination of conviction in the thesis, resilience and – she is quick to add – timing.
Advertisement
“Across Europe right now, female GPs stand at about 15pc,” she says. “When I pitch to LPs, investors are looking for track record. There are not a ton of GPs in the world who are women focused on what I’m focused on, where they can say, ‘Oh yeah, I saw how that worked with that fund’. You need to continue to sell a promise of performance. You can’t really go back and say, ‘Have you seen how many fund managers just like me excelled over the last three years?’ So that can be hard.”
WakeUp Capital achieved its first close in 2024 and is currently working towards a final close in Q2 of this year. The fund now has eight companies in its portfolio, two of them Irish, with three additional Irish deals expected to close in the near term. The ambition is to invest with Irish companies as a primary market, though Walsh Drouillard is careful to frame that as a quality-driven target rather than a geographic obligation.
Measured impact
The fund occupies what Walsh Drouillard describes as a distinct position on the impact spectrum; it marries the commercial discipline and portfolio accountability of traditional venture capital with a mission-first focus on climate, health and inclusive tech. The fund seeks to deliver competitive market returns by backing scalable technologies where financial growth and measurable positive impact for the planet and society are closely linked.
“I’m not looking at sweet little metrics they can put in some ESG report that no one reads,” says Walsh Drouillard. “We cannot approve a deal without a recommendation from our Impact Advisory Committee. And part of our carry is linked to the impact success of the companies.”
Advertisement
That rigour extends to every deal the fund considers. The impact advisory committee reviews each potential investment to ensure portfolio companies are addressing genuine market problems rather than simply wearing the impact label. It makes the work harder, Walsh Drouillard says. It also makes it more meaningful.
“When people go through the process, I think they’re quite impressed, but I think they also feel like it’s really a value-add as opposed to what I would call a sweet, ‘feel-goodery’ exercise,” she says.
On the fundraising side, the experience has been instructive. Institutions such as the Irish Strategic Investment Fund, the European Investment Fund and Enterprise Ireland have invested in the fund alongside private capital, though Walsh Drouillard is candid about the harder task of convincing larger private institutional LPs, whose focus on track record and proven returns can make a first-time fund a difficult sell.
The more receptive audience has been family offices, high net worth individuals and exited entrepreneurs – and, she tells me, an increasingly engaged cohort of US-based investors actively seeking European opportunities.
Advertisement
Quality over geography
The question of geography is one Walsh Drouillard navigates carefully. Positioning Ireland as the fund’s primary market, she notes, can actually be counterproductive when talking to international LPs, which is why WakeUp Capital presents itself as Ireland-based but pan-European in scope. The Irish commitment is real, but it is the quality of deals that drives allocation, not the passport of the founder, she says.
Ireland’s start-up ecosystem, she tells me, is genuinely strong at the early stage. Enterprise Ireland and the broader support infrastructure provide a solid foundation, and there is real energy around entrepreneurship. But scaling remains a challenge, and in sectors like climate resilience, Walsh Drouillard identifies a gap in the kind of deep scientific and commercial expertise needed to evaluate technically complex opportunities. Ireland excels in software and medtech, she suggests, but the scientific and commercial knowledge required for some of the harder climate problems is not always easy to find.
It is a challenge she acknowledges close to home. Her own team brings very strong commercial and technical experience, she says, but evaluating the technical feasibility of certain climate and health-tech propositions requires additional scientific expertise, which the team is actively looking to engage.
Toward a transatlantic fund
On the broader European picture, Walsh Drouillard draws on her US background to offer a perspective that is both optimistic and clear-eyed. She is enthusiastic about the concept of EU Inc – the idea of Europe moving towards more unified, cross-border business structures – and draws a comparison to the successful introduction of the euro as evidence that the continent can embrace bold, unified approaches when the political will is there. What Europe sometimes needs, she suggests, is a more of the American bias towards possibility.
Advertisement
“I love the 27-member-state European Union – I am a Europhile,” she says. “But I don’t understand the value of maintaining your own administrative processes when it comes to building businesses. The euro currency is the best analogy. We’ve done so many other things. I have yet to hear a compelling reason why we should do it 27 different ways.”
The long-term vision for WakeUp Capital is to become a globally respected climate impact investment fund. Fund 1 is the foundation. Fund 2, she envisages, could be transatlantic – a structure that would connect the European and US markets, reflecting both her own background and the inherently borderless nature of the problems she is working to help solve.
“For the second fund, which we hope to launch in the coming years, I still believe in the potential of a great relationship between Europe and the US,” she says, adding that the relationship is not exactly at its strongest now. “But as a citizen of both, I still think there is incredible opportunity for collaboration. It’s just a question of understanding where Europe has the right to win right now and optimising for that.”
“Being culturally fluent in both countries gives us a bit of an edge,” she adds. “I’m a believer in ‘let’s see where each place has the right to win’. We will find the edges and the opportunities within that.”
Advertisement
As for her chosen path in the impact investment space, Walsh Drouillard is characteristically clear. “It’s not always easy. But it’s a privilege.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
A new report claims that Apple intends to make few changes to the current Apple Watch Series 11, beyond a new Watch face.
Previous reports have said that the Apple Watch Series 12 may get significant software updates, but that the hardware would remain much as it is with the current model. Now Bloomberg is reporting that there won’t be many changes to hardware or software at all.
Specifically, the report says there will definitely be at least one new Watch face, plus performance improvements, but then probably little more than fixes and presumably also security updates. Beyond that, the report goes no further than alluding to the possibility of small hardware updates.
Previously, it’s been expected that the Apple Watch will not directly include any Apple Intelligence features. Reports vary, but it’s believe that the Apple Watch currently has between 1GB and 1.5GB of RAM, and so presumably that limits just how much Apple Intelligence could do on the small device.
Advertisement
However, the Apple Watch may be able to display results from Apple Intelligence prompts.
There’s no indication in the new report that this will happen with watchOS 27, which is due to be announced at WWDC. Other prior reports have agreed that there will be few or no Apple Watch hardware updates in 2026, but some predict an all-glass redesign in 2028.
The Ford F-150 is the best-selling pickup truck in the United States — and the best-selling vehicle overall until the RAV4 dethroned it in 2025 – and for good reason. The F-150 has become immensely popular due to its straightforward nature. It’s simple and capable, with an excellent max towing capacity of 13,500 pounds and impressive off-roading, especially the F-150 Raptor R and Tremor trims. However, another truck in Ford’s stable, the Ranger, has it beat in one category: depreciation.
CarEdge’s analysis shows that the Ford F-150 has an estimated 50% depreciation over a five-year span, which is actually quite high compared to other pickup trucks like the Toyota Tacoma and Tundra. The first year is the worst, with the F-150 plummeting to 70% of its value in just one year. Based on a starting price of $62,008, an F-150 would be worth just $31,302 five years in.
Meanwhile, the Ford Ranger loses just 28% of its value over the same period, according to CarEdge. It does better in its first year, too, only losing 20% (versus the F-150’s 30%). By the fifth year, a $46,897-when-new Ranger would be worth $33,592.
Advertisement
Why does the Ford Ranger hold its value?
The Ford Ranger is generally considered a truck that holds its value quite well. In 2026, iSeeCars named the Ranger on its list of the 25 vehicles with the lowest five-year depreciation. The pickup placed 22nd in a list of vehicles from every segment. The Ranger placed third in the pickup category, with only the Toyota Tacoma and Toyota Tundra holding value better.
Advertisement
Part of the reason the Ranger holds its value better is likely its size. Mid-size trucks like the Ranger generally hold their value better than full-size trucks. For one, these trucks are smaller and easier to fit in a garage or driveway. Smaller trucks are also more affordable, which could make them more appealing to the average American who might be struggling to afford a new car. Interest in used mid-size trucks has climbed in the 2020s, and their value has also risen alongside this demand — keeping prices high in turn.
Jenny Zhang left New York for Shenzhen last year with a clear plan. She wanted to build a camera that fit right into daily routines without forcing anyone to hold a device or wear something on their face. The result sits in her hair like an ordinary barrette, chunky and white, ready to record whatever passes in front of it.
Zhang is the founder of Computer Angel, a small startup company where she spent months hammering away in workshops to develop her idea into a fully functional prototype. The clip easily snaps into place and keeps securely in place even when you move around; you wouldn’t want to take it off once it’s attached. With the camera positioned directly over the top of your head, the moment you hit the button or even tap it, it begins snapping away.
8K30fps 360° Video with Dual 1/1.28″ Sensors: Capture stunning detail with dual 1/1.28″ sensors shooting up to 8K30fps. Film epic adventures…
Triple AI Chip Design, Better Low Light: Shoot confidently even in challenging lighting. X5’s triple AI chip design powers advanced noise reduction…
Invisible Selfie Stick: Create impossible third-person views with no selfie stick in sight! Capture everything in 360°, then choose your angles later…
The resulting footage appears to be fairly low-resolution, with a quality comparable to those old-school flip phones. The colors are all warm and fuzzy on the edges, giving each clip a unique personality that is far more appealing than the super-sharp, clinical stuff. You receive a hands-free view of your daily life from an angle that your phone simply cannot reach, as if you had a personal cameraman following you around at all times.
Zhang made a point of keeping things lighthearted with design, such as making the clip look like a piece of jewelry first and then a piece of technology, which turns out to be quite significant because people are far more inclined to go for something that looks beautiful on them. Now, the smart glasses that larger businesses are producing are all about packing in mics, speakers, and other aids that can identify things in real time or answer your queries on the fly. Computer Angel’s camera? No way, because there is only one task to do: save what you see, exactly as you see it.
Zhang has yet to announce exact pricing or release dates. She’s keeping the details under wraps while she refines the build, but she’s always glad to share progress on social media, posting test videos and behind-the-scenes looks at the process of transitioning from a sketch to actual hardware. [Source]
Current Siri has a colorful animation, but none of the New Siri smarts.
The long-awaited overhaul of Siri is already two years later than planned. Even so, it will still be beta software when it does actually arrive.
Back in WWDC 2024, Apple introduced its new Siri with contextual awareness and other major improvements for the digital assistant. However, while it ultimately didn’t arrive later in the year in iOS 18, and didn’t even make it to iOS 26, it is now expected to turn up in iOS 27.
However, despite Apple having an extra two years to work on the new AI-infused Siri, it won’t be a fully completed product release. According to Mark Gurman in Sunday’s “Power On” newsletter for Bloomberg, it will be arriving as a “beta” release.
Advertisement
A test version of iOS 27 being trialled internally before WWDC includes a toggle to turn off the new Siri experience. Disabling it will revert back to the current Siri.
However, while this will be used in the developer builds after WWDC, it apparently won’t be limited to that. When the public release of the 27-generation operating systems happens in the fall, it is believed Apple will retain the button at first.
If true this means Siri will be beta software when it comes time for it to be used by all iPhone and iPad users.
It’s a move that won’t inspire confidence in New Siri, especially if Apple deems it beta after working on it for so long.
Advertisement
A turbulent arrival
Apple’s development of New Siri has been a slow and painfully public process for the historically secretive company.
After a horrific period, Apple software chief Craig Federighi eventually took control of the AI teams in January. The same month, Apple confirmed a multi-year dealwith Google will help speed up the development of Apple Foundation Models.
However, Apple is still dealing with the typical churn of engineers in its AI teams, as they move to new and more lucrative opportunities. In February, it was reported Apple was still struggling with internal testing of Siri.
Despite all of this, there is still a general belief that Apple will finally get a usable version of New Siri out of its labs sometime in 2026.
Apple will relaunch Apple Intelligence and Siri platforms with new Apple Foundation Models. Despite Google’s involvement, Apple will maintain its privacy stance.
When Apple Intelligence was revealed during WWDC 2024, Apple had a hybrid system in place that would ultimately fail to deliver. Delays ensued, and it seems that the long wait is over for Apple’s true AI strategy to emerge.
According to the Power On newsletter, Apple won’t be compromising on privacy with its new AI efforts. While the report is colored with suppositions and conjecture about what is coming, it lays out a fairly clear picture.
Apple will not be compromising on privacy for the sake of better artificial intelligence.
Advertisement
There aren’t any new details about Apple’s AI efforts. It repeats everything we know about the upcoming strategy and paints a picture of loss, shortcomings, and desperation on Apple’s part.
Of course, I don’t see it in quite the same light.
Apple’s place in the AI race
The AI industry lurched ahead of Apple with increasingly powerful models that could perform seemingly amazing tasks. The demos have always been something spectacular, like out of science fiction, but the real-world use has been something a little more mundane.
Apple doesn’t need to win the race if it controls the track
Advertisement
People have become upset that their sacrifice of the world’s knowledge and data has led to very little. Some AI is great and accelerates human workflows, but the cost to our financial markets, component availability, and environment has been incredible.
Apple has missed out on the hype cycle around AI, but has thrived in spite of it. It keeps having record quarterly results without any significant updates to its AI systems, which contradicts the grifts being sold to investors.
With ChatGPT set to become cash-poor by 2028 without an influx of cash and the general public becoming increasingly angry at AI companies, Apple’s position couldn’t be stronger. It isn’t one of desperation and failure, but one of success due to patience.
Advertisement
I’m not saying that Apple wouldn’t have been happy to see its initial launch go more smoothly. Nor am I saying Apple wouldn’t have released upgraded AI sooner if it could have.
It all just seems to be a happy accident. But instead of wallowing in self-pity, Apple is doing what it does best.
Apple is about to bust into the industry late with a solution that actually meets people where they are.
Apple’s privacy stance will hold
Expect WWDC 2026 to reveal a lot of what Apple hopes to accomplish through the following year with AI. However, it won’t reveal everything, like explicit details about working with Google Gemini.
There are also rumors of Apple renting AI compute space from Google, which is likely given the state of the market. However, users don’t need to worry that Apple is sending data to Google servers.
Whatever servers and GPU clusters Apple uses, they will be operated no differently than Private Cloud Compute with data privacy protections in place. It is no different than Apple renting data servers from Google or Amazon for iCloud.
Advertisement
Those companies don’t have access to the data. Period.
Apple’s AI strategy
Anyway, the new Apple Foundation Models will be the central backbone of Apple’s new AI strategy. They will run both on-device and in Private Cloud Compute to parse data and complete tasks on behalf of the user.
An on-device AI that stays out of the way
Most users will likely interact with Apple’s AI systems and Siri using these base models and nothing else. It will be the default, and after the Gemini training, will likely be more than enough for the features Apple will reveal during WWDC.
Advertisement
Anyone who wants to ignore AI on Apple platforms will be able to do so.
For those who want other options, Apple is providing developers with an API. The OpenAI relationship is fraying, and Apple will likely boot them from their privileged positions with iOS 27.
Instead, apps like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude will be able to be installed from the App Store and become endpoints for Apple Foundation Models. That means whether you’re invoking Siri or general Apple Intelligence programs, you can send data to third-party AI for parsing and execution.
Such integrations will maintain user privacy through the use of the API. Apple will likely establish that developers must adhere to strict privacy rules to access the API or face being revoked from access.
Advertisement
If Apple doesn’t go that route, then at the least, Apple will warn users of the privacy risks of using third-party models.
Apple has spent over a decade telling users that their iPhone is private and secure
The end result is a new set of (hopefully) capable Apple Foundation Models powering every AI interaction on iPhone with privacy and security intact. Users will also be able to tap into their favorite, arguably more capable, AI models as they need or want to.
Apple won’t need to be the best in the AI space. Instead, it will have a strong enough base offering with the option of supporting external AI models as an expansion of its ecosystem.
Advertisement
Sure, Apple is late in doing this, but coloring it as some kind of desperate move seems odd. It’s Apple doing what Apple does best, and that’s disrupting an established market with a better business model targeted at user needs above profits and grift.
Apple will own the AI ecosystem by playing host to every model on its powerful hardware while offering good-enough models on-device.
WWDC 2026 will begin on June 8 with a keynote address. Expect it to be an AI-focused event considering the amount that will need to be covered in the space.
It’s likewise smartly designed, packing up into—as you likely already gleaned—the shape of a suitcase. The heavy-duty handles and latches are strong. Though the Nomad is 28 pounds, which is a bit on the heavy side for a single-hand carry, the shape and large handle actually make it easier to carry than smaller and cheaper models.
The Nomad uses a dual-venting system to achieve good airflow, even when the lid is closed. The vents, combined with the raised fins on the bottom of the grill (which elevate your charcoal, allowing air to flow underneath), allow for very precise control of both high and low temperatures. If you live and die by overlanding, this grill could be your new constant companion.
Photograph: Weber
A Great Budget Portable Grill: WIRED reviewer Scott Gilbertson also loves the simple Weber Jumbo Joe ($90), a smaller version of the classic Original Kettle. It’s an easy choice for tailgates, especially. And if you want to use it at home, you can build yourself a stand for home cookouts. It’s low-cost, light, and dead simple. All are virtues.
Other Grills I Recommend
Advertisement
Recteq X-Fire Pro
Photograph: Kat Merck
Recteq X-Fire Pro 825 for $1,400: Pellet smokers rarely crest much over 450 degrees Fahrenheit, which does not offer the sear you’d get on a charcoal or gas grill. But Recteq’s 825-square-inch, dual-pot X-Fire Pro wants to be your everything device, notes WIRED reviewer Kat Merck. In Smoke Mode, the left fire pot ignites for classic low-and-slow smoking. Switch the big knob to Grill Mode, and both pots fire up, with an adjustable damper over the right side. The damper, controllable with another knob, allows you to open access to the right fire pot just a little bit, or all the way to the gates of hell—1,200 degrees Fahrenheit. It takes about 20 minutes for the fire pot to get going this high, and if you don’t clean the fire pot first, it’ll kick off a lot of sparks in the process. Who knows why you need to get to 1,200 degrees? But as Merck notes, this is a company known for a cartoon bull logo and bull-horn handles. “Recteq likes to be extreme, so it tracks,” she says. If you keep your sear to a more human 600 degrees Fahrenheit, it’s a solid grill and sear experience. But keep in mind that the high power draw from the dual igniters will require a 10- or-12-gauge extension cord, which is probably better than the cord you’ve got at home. The X-Fire also didn’t produce the same smokiness as WIRED’s top-pick Recteq Flagship 1600, according to Merck’s testing, which means you’ll end up using smoke tubes at low temperature if you want to get more smoke in the meat. Note, too, that the advertised 20-pound pellet capacity is split between fire pots. This could mean refilling a 10-pound hopper multiple times during a long cook.
Photograph: Brad Bourque
Traeger Woodridge Pro for $1,000: The Traeger Woodridge Pro is WIRED’s previous top-pick pellet grill and smoker for most people. It still exists beautifully at the intersection of value and utility, and is likely to make you popular in the neighborhood. It’s a straightforward beast of a thing that’s easy to clean, easy to dial in for a perfect rack of ribs, and big enough to cook up two pork bellies at the same time. My new top-pick Recteq has a couple smart features that make us prefer it, like temperature history on its meat probes, and an easier learning curve on smart features. But this Woodridge will still make you quite popular in the neighborhood.
Photograph: Traeger
Traeger Timberline Wi-Fi Wood Pellet Grill for $3,300: If you’re serious about grilling and smoking, Traeger’s Timberline is almost a step up from a smoker. It’s the perfect all-in-one outdoor kitchen. It uses the same wireless smoking smarts as the Woodridge but adds some extras, like an induction burner (perfect for adding a last-minute sear with a cast-iron pan or steaming some veggies). The insulated smoke box has room for six pork shoulders, or about the equivalent racks of ribs or chickens. Former WIRED editor Parker Hall has managed to feed hundreds of people using it. (As a longtime food and barbecue critic, I can vouch heartily for Hall’s resulting brisket and ribs.) If that’s not enough, there’s also an XL version that’s even bigger. “All of my meats heated evenly and were perfectly cooked right when the smoker said they would be,” Hall says. If you want flawless smoking from the comfort of your couch and price is not a factor, the Timberline delivers.
Advertisement
Courtesy of Masterbuilt
Masterbuilt Gravity Series 800 for $899: This spacious Masterbuilt offers a nice combination, notes WIRED reviewer Chris Smith: charcoal flavor with the temperature precision of gas or electricity. The large, top-loading charcoal hopper uses gravity (hence the name) to feed heat into an internal housing, and an integrated fan enables precise digital temperature control—on the device or via the app. You’ll reach 700 degrees Fahrenheit within 15 minutes. Temperatures are remarkably consistent once stabilized, and if you want to add smoke flavor, just throw wood chunks into the ash bin and let falling charcoal embers do the rest. But the versatility comes with caveats. You may miss the ability to sear directly over a flame, and you’ll need to change out the internal housing before switching to the flat-top grill.
Courtesy of Yoder
Yoder YS640S Pellet Smoker for $2,700: Most grills do one thing well and several others poorly or not at all. Yoder’s YS640S is a more versatile tool, thanks to a design that allows easy access to the auto-feed firebox. Like Traegers that are half the price, this Kansas-made grill uses an electric fan and an auger to feed wood pellets in for a slow smoke session. It’s all driven by a control board that sends temp alerts and allows you to adjust the temperature via Wi-Fi. As a smoker, it easily handled ribs and a chuck roast, holding the temperature better than most. This is thanks to its bomb-proof 10-gauge steel construction, which means this grill weighs as much as a refrigerator. Where the Yoder really stands out, though, is as a grill and possible pizza oven. By removing a steel plate positioned over the fire pit, you can sear burgers directly over the flame or remove the grills and plop on a hefty pizza oven attachment ($489), which uses the pellet feed system to maintain a constant 900-plus degrees Fahrenheit.
A Grill to Avoid
Courtesy of Ace
Kamado Joe Konnected Joe for $1,900: There’s a lot to like about this kamado-style grill. Indeed, WIRED previously recommended it for its electric ignition and Wi-Fi connectivity that allows you to measure the temperature of the interior and the meat via two probes. But over long-term use, WIRED commerce director Martin Cizmar has had constant problems with the electric grill tripping the 2-year-old GFCI outlets on his patio. Once it even tripped the breaker. A Reddit thread reveals this is a common problem. Like the Redditors, Cizmar found temporary relief by running an extension cord into an outlet in his kitchen, but even that has failed him a few times during testing. Unfortunately, this grill is a hard pass until the issue is resolved.
Apple wants more people to use Genmoji, by creating suggestions based on phrases that you type into the iOS 27 and iPadOS 27 keyboard, and what you’ve got stored in Photos.
Users of Messages will be familiar with the occasional appearance of emoji as a suggestion when typing on the software keyboard. For iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, they may get a lot more options to include Genmoji.
The underwhelming Apple Intelligence feature hasn’t really caught on with consumers since its introduction in 2024, despite executive claims it has. However, with some changes coming to Genmoji in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, Bloomberg’s “Power On” newsletter says that users will be prodded to use it more.
A small change in iOS 27 will be Suggested Genmoji. Much like the existing emoji suggestions when typing, users will also see Genmoji produced using commonly-typed phrases, mashed up with your Photos.
Advertisement
While promoting Genmoji by serving up ready-to-use options to users will help the feature become more popular, not everyone will need to deal with it. A toggle will be available to disable the feature, hiding the new graphics from view.
Another update
The inbound improvements to Genmoji join a number of others that Apple has already made to the feature.
In iOS 26, users were able to create custom expressions, using prompts like “Smiling,” “Shocked,” or “Sleepy.” Physical traits like hair, glasses, and hats could also be added to the images.
Apple also improved the AI behind Genmoji to create smarter results and higher-quality images. There was also Genmoji support for Tapback reactions.
Advertisement
Whatever Apple comes up with, it will be first shown off at WWDC 2026 in June.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login