Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

JBL Tune 730BT Review – Trusted Reviews

Published

on

Verdict

The JBL Tune 730BT is a no-frills wireless over-ear that nails the budget brief. There’s no noise cancelling and no spatial trickery, but you do get JBL Pure Bass Sound, Bluetooth 6.0 with Multipoint, crazy good 76-hour battery life, a foldable design and reliable two-mic call quality. At £39.99, the 730BT is one of the easiest budget recommendations going, provided you’re happy to live without ANC. For students, second-pair buyers and anyone who just wants to plug in and listen, there’s considerable value for money

  • 76-hour battery life is exceptional

  • Solid Pure Bass Sound

  • Custom EQ plus six presets

  • Foldable, lightweight build

  • Relax mode with ambient sounds

  • No active noise cancelling

  • Plastic build is unmistakably budget

  • No charging cable in the box

  • No 3.5mm wired option

Key Features

  • Advertisement

    Audio

    JBL Pure Bass Sound with 40mm dynamic drivers

  • Advertisement

    Wireless

    Bluetooth 6.0 with Multipoint, Fast Pair and Swift Pair

  • Advertisement

    Calls

    Two beamforming mics for hands-free calls

Introduction

There are two ways to do budget wireless headphones. You can build a glossy facsimile of a flagship and hope nobody notices the missing features, or you can pick three or four things to do well, leave the rest off the spec sheet and price the result accordingly. The JBL Tune 730BT belongs to the second school.

Advertisement

At £39.99, the Tune 730BT is an entry point into JBL’s revamped Tune line-up. There’s no noise cancelling, no Spatial Sound, no Hi-Res, no cable in the box. What you get instead is headline JBL Pure Bass tuning, Bluetooth 6.0, the same generous 76-hour battery life as the 780NC, Multipoint and a foldable design.

It’s a familiar JBL formula, refined for the post-Bluetooth LE Audio era. The question is whether the 730BT does enough to justify a place in the increasingly crowded budget wireless category, and whether anyone should still bother with ANC-free headphones in 2026.

Advertisement


Design

  • Familiar JBL silhouette
  • Lightweight and foldable
  • Four colourways

Pull the Tune 730BT out of the box, and the family resemblance is immediate. JBL has applied the same design language as the rest of the new Tune range: smooth polycarbonate cups with the JBL logo embossed on each side, a slim padded headband, soft polyurethane leatherette earpads and minimal external branding.

Build is plastic, as you’d expect at the price, but it doesn’t feel cheap in hand. There’s no creak from the headband, the hinges fold cleanly without protesting, and the 218g weight is well-judged for a £39.99 over-ear. Compared to a Sony WH-CH520 or Sennheiser Accentum Wireless, the 730BT feels comparable.

Advertisement

Without ANC, you’re relying on passive isolation; fortunately, it’s impressive even if the screech of the London Underground inevitably finds its way through. For office use or home work when you need to focus, the 730BT is up to the task, even with the washing machine at full tilt and within earshot.

JBL 730BT controlsJBL 730BT controls
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Controls are physical buttons on the right earcup – power, Bluetooth pairing and volume – plus a USB-C charging port on the same side. There’s no 3.5mm jack, which is the most obvious omission for wired revivalists. There’s no charging cable or carry case, but you do get a rudimentary fabric pouch to keep the dust off.

Comfort is a no-grumbles good. The earpads are deep enough that the drivers sit clear of the ears, the clamping force is light without losing the seal, and a long working day passes without the temple-ache that some glasses-wearers get from heavier rivals.

JBL 730BT worn by reviewerJBL 730BT worn by reviewer
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The headband padding could be a touch more substantial, but it’s a minor gripe as the 730BT are one of the more comfortable budget over-ears I’ve tested, with only moderate heat build-up

Four colours are offered: Black, Blue, Beige and White. None shouts ‘budget headphone’.

Advertisement

Battery Life

  • 76-hour quoted playback
  • Speed-charge support
  • USB-C charging in two hours

Advertisement

JBL quotes up to 76 hours of playtime on Bluetooth, and that figure holds up well in real-world use at moderate volumes. Across a week of mixed commuting, video calls and music listening, the headphones registered a charge cycle every 9 to 11 days.

Standby drain is minimal, which is the difference between a 76-hour spec and a 76-hour reality.

A 5-minute speed charge delivers five hours of playback. A full charge from flat takes about two hours over USB-C.

JBL 730BT foldableJBL 730BT foldable
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Talk time is quoted at up to 45 hours, which is fairly generous. There’s no power-bank function, no wireless charging and no quick-charge LED indicator; you charge it from flat, you forget about it, you charge it again.

Remember, JBL hasn’t shipped a USB-C cable in the box. A mild annoyance for anyone migrating from older Lightning or Micro-USB hardware.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Features

  • Bluetooth 6.0 with Multipoint
  • Three EQ presets in the JBL Headphones app
  • Two beamforming mics

Bluetooth 6.0 is a notable upgrade over the Tune 720BT, and it brings two practical benefits: lower power consumption and reduced latency for video. In testing, the 730BT held a stable connection across a flat with the bedroom door shut, and audio stayed in sync during back-to-back YouTube clips and Netflix episodes.

Multipoint is the more useful addition. The 730BT can stay paired with two devices simultaneously and switches automatically between them when audio is requested.

JBL 730BT headbandJBL 730BT headband
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Pause an Apple Music playlist on your phone, accept a Teams call on the laptop, and the headphones follow without intervention, something that shouldn’t be sniffed at on £39.99 headphones. Google Fast Pair and Microsoft Swift Pair handle initial pairing on Android and Windows, respectively.

The JBL Headphones app offers some interesting features, including smart audio and video modes to support your content. This becomes disabled when LE Audio mode is enabled. EQ presets are equally imaginative. Choose from Studio, Bass, Club, Extreme Bass, Vocal, or Jazz, with Studio set to default. Alternatively, there’s custom EQ functionality.

Advertisement

Advertisement
JBL 730BT appJBL 730BT app
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Relax mode is a small but thoughtful extra where you can build up to five custom mixes from a library of ambient sounds (rain, waves, white noise and the like), with a sliding bar that sets a timer for how long the mix plays. You can overlay sounds, too, although the result is more tsunami than Serengeti.

Two beamforming mics handle calls. Each earcup carries one mic, and the array is tuned to focus on the wearer’s voice while suppressing background noise. The performance is clear in quiet environments, decent on a windless street and patchy in busier ones.

Sound Quality

  • Warm, bass-led JBL Pure Bass tuning
  • Vocals sit forward in the mix
  • Treble too bright at high volumes

JBL Pure Bass is exactly what it sounds like: a low-end-led tuning that wants you to feel a kick drum more than count the cymbals. It suits modern pop, hip-hop, electronic and rock, and the 730BT delivers it competently. Run anything off Apple Music’s infectious Loops electronic playlist with the Studio preset, and the bass has weight without going boomy.

The Club preset provides an able alternative if the weekend really has landed, while Bass and Extreme Bass feel unnecessary and are best avoided unless you’re a complete heathen. Dip into Vocal or Jazz for more sedate listening habits, from the Sades et al of this world. 

Advertisement

JBL 730BT earcupsJBL 730BT earcups
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

What surprises is the midrange. Bass is ever-present, but the 730BT keeps vocals forward enough that podcasts and audiobooks come through clearly, and even the intricacies of a fingerpicked guitar get time in the limelight.

Treble is the area most exposed to the budget. At low and moderate volumes, it’s clean and crisp; push past 80 per cent, and things become prickly. The Vocal EQ preset partly tames it; the Studio preset tolerates moderate volumes best. The overall soundstage is small, as it is with most closed-back budget headphones. Don’t expect spatial scale; do expect a focused, energetic presentation that flatters most modern production.

Advertisement

Should you buy it?

I like a bassy bang for my buck

If you want long battery life, easy multipoint and competent JBL bass for £40, the Tune 730BT is an obvious pick

Advertisement

I’ve booked a Jet2 holiday

A pair of JBL noise cancellers doesn’t cost that much more, and if you’re set on travelling, you’ll want the extra isolation.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

JBL has resisted the temptation to plaster the Tune 730BT spec sheet with features that wouldn’t survive the price, and instead focused on the basics that matter: comfort, battery life, connectivity, and tuning that suits the music most people listen to.

The 76 hours of playtime alone are enough to make this one worth the £39.99. Throw in Bluetooth 6.0 with Multipoint, foldable build, a custom EQ and six presets, Relax mode and Fast Pair on Android, and the 730BT comfortably outpaces what budget over-ears looked like even two years ago.

Advertisement

Compromises are clearly signposted. There’s no ANC, no 3.5mm jack and no cable in the box. If any of those matter, the JBL Tune 780NC offers Adaptive ANC, Spatial Sound and a Hi-Res cable for £120, even if it’s going to eat into your Benidorm cocktail budget.

If you want a clean, comfortable, capable wireless headphone at a properly affordable price, you’re on safe ground here. Nevertheless, check out our best cheap headphones round-up for further choice.

Advertisement

How We Test

I tested the JBL Tune 730BT using them as a daily commuter pair, a home-office headphone for video calls, and a casual everyday-listening option around the house.

Advertisement

Music testing covered electronic, hip-hop, classical and acoustic singer-songwriter material, streamed primarily over Bluetooth from an iPhone 16e via Apple Music, with additional testing on a MacBook Air for Multipoint behaviour.

Battery life was assessed across a full discharge cycle from a full charge, with mixed Bluetooth and call use throughout.

  • On commutes
  • At a desk
  • Over a full charge cycle

FAQs

What’s the difference between the JBL Tune 720BT and Tune 730BT?

The 730BT upgrades to Bluetooth 6.0 with LC3 codec support, adds Google Fast Pair and improves the dual-mic call array. Battery life remains class-leading at 76 hours.

Advertisement
Can the JBL Tune 730BT be used wired?

No. The 730BT is wireless-only. There is no 3.5mm jack, and the included USB-C port is for charging only — there is no wired Hi-Res audio mode.

Advertisement

Full Specs

  JBL Tune 730BT Review
UK RRP £39.99
EU RRP €79.99
Manufacturer JBL
IP rating No
Battery Hours 76
Fast Charging Yes
Weight 218 G
ASIN B0FSH42VZW
Release Date 2025
Audio Resolution SBC, AAC, LC3
Driver (s) 40mm dynamic
Connectivity Bluetooth 6, Auracast
Colours Black, Blue, Beige, White
Frequency Range 20 2000 – Hz
Headphone Type Over-ear

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

5 Lexus Engines You Should Steer Clear Of

Published

on





Lexus has spent more than three decades earning the reliability that most luxury brands would love to borrow. From the original LS 400 that humbled German sedans, to early RX and ES models, the brand has conditioned buyers to trust any Lexus engine almost by default, and most of the time that trust is warranted.

But no automaker bats a thousand. Hidden in Lexus’ 35-year engine catalog are a few designs that don’t quite live up to the badge. The five engines ahead span nearly every era of the brand and together power hundreds of thousands of vehicles still on the road. These include a twin-turbo V6 that can stall when stray machining debris wipes out its bearings, another V6 that became known for turning its oil into sludge, the hybrid four-cylinder that powered the company’s first hybrid car and burned oil faster than fuel, a compact direct injection V6 that misfires when carbon clogs its intake valves, and an otherwise reliable Lexus V8 engine with a fire-risk related recall.

Advertisement

Have all of them been fixed by recalls, updated parts, or warranty programs? In most cases, yes. Does that mean every example you’ll find on a used car lot will be bad? Not really. But if you’re shopping for a used LX 600, IS 250, ES 300, RX 300, HS 250h, GX 460, or LS 460, the engine under the hood deserves more attention than the badge on the grille.

Advertisement

1. 1MZ-FE 3.0L V6

When Toyota introduced the all-aluminum 1MZ-FE in the mid-1990s, it looked like the perfect luxury V6. Aluminum saved weight over the iron 3VZ it replaced, twin overhead cams kept it smooth to 5,800 rpm, and its broad torque curve gave the ES 300 and first-gen RX 300 the effortless feel buyers expected from a Lexus. Later updates even added variable valve timing, helping the engine meet low-emissions targets without giving up power. The problem is that the 1MZ-FE also became one of the main engines tied to Toyota and Lexus’s oil-sludge controversy.

It started with reports of thick, oily sludge building up under the valve covers, and it quickly became one of Toyota’s most notorious reliability issues. Engine oil is supposed to stay thin enough to move quickly through narrow passages, carry heat away from hot spots, and keep bearings and cam surfaces from grinding against each other.

In the 1MZ-FE, however, degraded oil could thicken into sticky deposits instead of flowing cleanly through the engine, and it showed up as warning lights, blue smoke at startup, burning oil, valve knock, sudden stalling, and no-start conditions. In the worst cases, the engine sludge problem led to complete engine failure, with quotes for thousands of dollars in major internal work involving the short block, heads, valve covers, and cams.

The problem was widespread enough to pull in the 1MZ-FE-powered Lexus ES 300 and RX 300, and Toyota addressed it through a Special Policy adjustment rather than a formal recall; a later class-action settlement ultimately covered about 3.5 million 1997-2002 Toyota and Lexus vehicles.

Advertisement

2. 4GR-FSE 2.5L direct-injection V6

Toyota’s GR family makes some of the most respected V6s in modern motoring, but the 4GR-FSE is the odd child. Lexus dropped it into the second-generation IS 250 (2006-2010 sedan, 2010 IS 250C) as a downsized alternative to the 3.5-liter IS 350. Technically, it looked smart: a modern, high-compression GR-family V6 with dual VVT-i and, critically, D-4 direct fuel injection. Lexus claims the direct-injection system helped cool the cylinders, allowing the 4GR-FSE to run at higher compression and extract more efficiency from a small luxury-sedan V6.

Advertisement

The problem is that gasoline direct injection engines also remove one useful side effect of port injection. In a port-injected engine, fuel is sprayed upstream of the intake valve, which helps “wash” the backs of the valves as the engine runs and makes it harder for oily vapors and deposits to stick. In the 4GR-FSE, fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, so the intake valves don’t get that natural cleaning effect. Without it, carbon deposits are more likely to build up on the intake side over time. Once carbon deposits built up, the 4GR-FSE could show check-engine and VSC lights, rough cold starts, shaky idle, random cylinder misfires, sputtering at stops, sudden loss of power, and occasional stalling when rpm dropped. Some cases involved repeat top-engine cleanings, piston/ring work, or complete engine replacement.

Because Lexus treated it as a drivability/emissions issue — not a safety defect — it was handled with service bulletins and a Customer Support Program instead of a recall. That coverage ran for nine years, but it’s expired now, which means today’s used-IS buyers pay out of pocket for cleanings and related repairs or sidestep the 4GR altogether and buy the port-and-direct-injected IS 350 instead.

Advertisement

3. 1UR-FE/1UR-FSE 4.6L V8

When Lexus replaced its long-running 4.3L LS V8 and 4.7L GX V8 engines, the 4.6L 1UR looked like the perfect upgrade. The 1UR-FSE arrived in the LS 460 as a newly developed 4.6-liter V8, while the 1UR-FE followed in the 2010 GX 460 as a stronger, more efficient replacement for the old 4.7-liter V8. Early 1UR-era cars, however, had a number of problems, and the one that drew the most attention was a valve-spring defect.

Toyota found that some valve springs in certain 2007-2008 LS 460/LS 460L and 2008 GS 460 V8 engines could create small cracks and eventually break. Once a valve spring fails, the engine can act like it’s starving for fuel; sluggish throttle response, sudden power loss, heavy shaking/misfires, and in the worst cases, it stalls and won’t restart.

Another issue involved the fuel system. On some 1UR-powered Lexus models, the gasket sealing the fuel-pressure sensor to the fuel delivery pipe could lose its seal over time, causing the fuel to leak into the engine bay, sometimes with little warning beyond a fuel smell, and that obviously raises the risk of a fire. On the SUV side, some GX 460s had a secondary-air injection fault that could trigger the check-engine light and put the truck into reduced-power/limp mode until the pump or valves were replaced.

Advertisement

Toyota addressed the broken springs with a safety recall, replaced the fuel-sensor gasket under a different recall, and later issued a GX 460 Warranty Enhancement for air-injection pump failures and switching valves for 10 years.

Advertisement

4. 2AZ-FXE 2.4L hybrid four-cylinder

The 2AZ-FXE was the mechanical heart of the Lexus HS 250h, which arrived for 2010 as the world’s first hybrid-only luxury vehicle and Lexus’s first four-cylinder gas engine paired with Lexus Hybrid Drive. It came from Toyota’s ubiquitous 2AZ engine family, including the conventional 2AZ-FE and the hybrid 2AZ-FXE, which powered countless Camrys, RAV4s, and Scion tCs before doing duty in the HS 250h’s 2010-2012 run. It was a very different kind of Lexus engine from the brand’s well-known V6s; a 2.4-liter tuned to prioritize fuel economy above everything else. Unfortunately, fuel economy wasn’t the only thing it became known for; oil consumption became the real problem.

In a healthy engine, piston rings are supposed to do two jobs at once: keep combustion pressure above the piston where it belongs and scrape excess oil off the cylinder walls so it doesn’t get pulled into the combustion chamber. When the oil control side of that job starts failing, the engine can begin consuming oil so gradually that a driver may not notice until the level has fallen much farther than it should. Once oil levels drop too far, bearings, cylinder walls, and the valvetrain are all working with less protection than they were designed to have.

There was no recall for the HS 250h; Lexus addressed excessive oil consumption with a Warranty Enhancement Program for certain 2010-2012 HS 250h vehicles, which called for updated piston assemblies. The HS 250h itself was a short-lived Lexus experiment, effectively discontinued in North America after 2012 and credited with only about 67,000 sales globally by 2016. Even Toyota moved on with the 2012 Camry, switching to a new 2.5-liter hybrid engine in place of the 2.4.

Advertisement

5. V35A-FTS 3.4 twin-turbo V6

The V35A-FTS was Lexus’s and Toyota’s clean break from the V8s that powered their old-school trucks and body-on-frame flagship SUVs. Instead of relying on displacement, the 3.4-liter twin turbo V6 uses boost to do the heavy lifting, which is why the LX 600 can make 409 horsepower and 479 lb-ft of torque from two fewer cylinders than the LX 570 before it. The tradeoff is that such boosted engines deliver their strongest shoves early, right in the low-mid rpm range where heavy SUVs and pickups spend most of their time. That also puts repeated stress through the crankshaft, which makes the bottom end especially important.

That starts with the crankshaft main bearings, which are not glamorous parts but keep the rotating assembly alive. Every time combustion pushes a piston down, that force travels through the connecting rod into the crankshaft. And the crank only survives because it rides on main bearings with a thin, pressurized oil layer acting as a lubricant between the metal surfaces.

Advertisement

In the V35A-FTS’s case, machining debris was left inside some engines during manufacturing. Those tiny metal particles can circulate with the oil, reach the crankshaft main bearings, and get trapped right where the crank is supposed to be riding on a clean, pressurized film. If the debris sticks and the engine keeps seeing higher loads over time, the bearings can fail – showing up as knocking, rough running, a no-start, or even a stall. Once it gets far, the result is complete engine failure.

That V35A-FTS engine is used in the 2022-present Toyota Tundra, 2022-present Lexus LX 600, and 2024-present Lexus GX 550. The machining debris was covered by a recall for certain 2022-2024 Tundra/LX and 2024 GX vehicles (126,691 in the US)

Advertisement

How we chose these engines

Lexus is one of the most reliable luxury brands in the world, which is why this list needed a careful filter, as reliability should not be treated like a free pass. We didn’t choose engines just because they had a few angry owner complaints, high repair bills, or one-off horror stories. A Lexus engine only made the cut if the problem had a larger paper trail behind it, such as a recall, service bulletin, warranty extension, or other official action.

That doesn’t mean every vehicle with one of these engines is doomed. In fact, the opposite is true. Plenty of owners continue to report long, uneventful runs with some of the powertrains on this list, and many affected examples have run perfectly fine for years after being repaired.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

AirPods Max 2 vs Heavys H1H: Heavy metal headphones compared

Published

on

You’ve probably seen an ad for the rock-tuned Heavys H1H on the internet, and true to their word, they are in fact tuned for guitar-heavy rock. Here’s how they compare to Apple’s AirPods Max.

Two modern over ear headphones side by side: matte teal pair with rounded cups on the left, sleek black Heavys branded pair on the right, against a purple to green gradient background
AirPods Max 2 [left], Heavys H1H [right]

As a major mainstream tech company, Apple has an incentive to design to accommodate as many people as possible.
Its products may not necessarily have everything a particular person wants in an item. But even so, it will still be close enough to be acceptable for the majority of customers.
Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

JLab JBuds Open Wireless review: a genius concept, but I didn’t love them

Published

on

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

JLab JBuds Open Wireless: Two-minute review

JLab is well-known for its affordable headphones and earbuds, but this time the brand is branching out into something more unusual.

The JBuds Open Wireless are over-ear headphones designed to allow you to hear the world around you. Yes, everyone is doing that right now, just take a look at our best open earbuds guide — but while most open-ear options are earbuds, JLab has made an over-ear version. It promises to deliver the same open benefits but from a bigger — and for some people, more comfortable — form factor.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Faye Walsh Drouillard on building an impact fund from Ireland

Published

on

American-born, Ireland-based fund manager Faye Walsh Drouillard talks conviction, climate tech and what it takes to build an impact VC fund from scratch.

When Faye Walsh Drouillard sought out an impact-focused venture capital fund in Ireland, she looked at the market and could not find a structure that matched her vision. So she built one herself.

That instinct – to identify the gap and move – speaks to someone who has spent two decades operating at the intersection of purpose and capital. Born in Washington DC and raised in DC and California, Walsh Drouillard has lived in Europe for 20 years, 12 of them in Ireland, where she arrived initially due to her husband’s work in aircraft leasing. What began as a relocation for family reasons has, over time, become a genuine commitment to the Irish ecosystem and the founders building within it.

Her background is that of a social entrepreneur with deep roots in the nonprofit world and a long-standing preoccupation with two of the defining challenges of our time: climate change and inequality. Long before WakeUp Capital existed, she was active in angel investing, serving on non-profit boards and, increasingly, asking a question she found difficult to answer: where was the fund for founders building solutions to these problems?

Advertisement

“I didn’t see anything here in the Irish market that was focused on those themes,” says  Walsh Drouillard. “And I also felt like those themes, particularly the climate side, were going to become more and more important to the global economy, and certainly within Ireland.”

“I like to build. I like to create, and I brought an entrepreneurial approach to building the fund. Joining an existing fund to try to do that work probably wasn’t the right fit –  it would probably not have worked out for anyone. I wasn’t going to wait for someone to tap me on the shoulder.”

A winding path

The seed of WakeUp Capital was planted in 2019, when Walsh Drouillard – then working in the angel investing world – made clear to a syndicate her interest in climate-tech opportunities. It was there she met Mark Peters, who at the time was at Google, and who would become her co-founder. Together, they spent the years that followed conducting market research, making four early investments across Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK, and laying the foundations of what would become a dedicated VC fund.

It was not, she acknowledges, a straightforward path. Building a first-time fund is challenging for anyone and especially for an outsider. Building one as a female general partner in venture capital adds a layer of difficulty that Walsh Drouillard is candid about. What got her through, she says, was a combination of conviction in the thesis, resilience and – she is quick to add – timing.

Advertisement

“Across Europe right now, female GPs stand at about 15pc,” she says. “When I pitch to LPs, investors are looking for track record. There are not a ton of GPs in the world who are women focused on what I’m focused on, where they can say, ‘Oh yeah, I saw how that worked with that fund’. You need to continue to sell a promise of performance. You can’t really go back and say, ‘Have you seen how many fund managers just like me excelled over the last three years?’ So that can be hard.”

WakeUp Capital achieved its first close in 2024 and is currently working towards a final close in Q2 of this year. The fund now has eight companies in its portfolio, two of them Irish, with three additional Irish deals expected to close in the near term. The ambition is to invest with Irish companies as a primary market, though Walsh Drouillard is careful to frame that as a quality-driven target rather than a geographic obligation.

Measured impact

The fund occupies what Walsh Drouillard describes as a distinct position on the impact spectrum; it marries the commercial discipline and portfolio accountability of traditional venture capital with a mission-first focus on climate, health and inclusive tech. The fund seeks to deliver competitive market returns by backing scalable technologies where financial growth and measurable positive impact for the planet and society are closely linked.

“I’m not looking at sweet little metrics they can put in some ESG report that no one reads,” says Walsh Drouillard. “We cannot approve a deal without a recommendation from our Impact Advisory Committee. And part of our carry is linked to the impact success of the companies.”

Advertisement

That rigour extends to every deal the fund considers. The impact advisory committee reviews each potential investment to ensure portfolio companies are addressing genuine market problems rather than simply wearing the impact label. It makes the work harder, Walsh Drouillard says. It also makes it more meaningful.

“When people go through the process, I think they’re quite impressed, but I think they also feel like it’s really a value-add as opposed to what I would call a sweet, ‘feel-goodery’ exercise,” she says.

On the fundraising side, the experience has been instructive. Institutions such as the Irish Strategic Investment Fund, the European Investment Fund and Enterprise Ireland have invested in the fund alongside private capital, though Walsh Drouillard is candid about the harder task of convincing larger private institutional LPs, whose focus on track record and proven returns can make a first-time fund a difficult sell.

The more receptive audience has been family offices, high net worth individuals and exited entrepreneurs – and, she tells me, an increasingly engaged cohort of US-based investors actively seeking European opportunities.

Advertisement

Quality over geography

The question of geography is one Walsh Drouillard navigates carefully. Positioning Ireland as the fund’s primary market, she notes, can actually be counterproductive when talking to international LPs, which is why WakeUp Capital presents itself as Ireland-based but pan-European in scope. The Irish commitment is real, but it is the quality of deals that drives allocation, not the passport of the founder, she says.

Ireland’s start-up ecosystem, she tells me, is genuinely strong at the early stage. Enterprise Ireland and the broader support infrastructure provide a solid foundation, and there is real energy around entrepreneurship. But scaling remains a challenge, and in sectors like climate resilience, Walsh Drouillard identifies a gap in the kind of deep scientific and commercial expertise needed to evaluate technically complex opportunities. Ireland excels in software and medtech, she suggests, but the scientific and commercial knowledge required for some of the harder climate problems is not always easy to find.

It is a challenge she acknowledges close to home. Her own team brings very strong commercial and technical experience, she says, but evaluating the technical feasibility of certain climate and health-tech propositions requires additional scientific expertise, which the team is actively looking to engage.

Toward a transatlantic fund

On the broader European picture, Walsh Drouillard draws on her US background to offer a perspective that is both optimistic and clear-eyed. She is enthusiastic about the concept of EU Inc – the idea of Europe moving towards more unified, cross-border business structures – and draws a comparison to the successful introduction of the euro as evidence that the continent can embrace bold, unified approaches when the political will is there. What Europe sometimes needs, she suggests, is a more of the American bias towards possibility.

Advertisement

“I love the 27-member-state European Union – I am a Europhile,” she says. “But I don’t understand the value of maintaining your own administrative processes when it comes to building businesses. The euro currency is the best analogy. We’ve done so many other things. I have yet to hear a compelling reason why we should do it 27 different ways.”

The long-term vision for WakeUp Capital is to become a globally respected climate impact investment fund. Fund 1 is the foundation. Fund 2, she envisages, could be transatlantic – a structure that would connect the European and US markets, reflecting both her own background and the inherently borderless nature of the problems she is working to help solve.

“For the second fund, which we hope to launch in the coming years, I still believe in the potential of a great relationship between Europe and the US,” she says, adding that the relationship is not exactly at its strongest now. “But as a citizen of both, I still think there is incredible opportunity for collaboration. It’s just a question of understanding where Europe has the right to win right now and optimising for that.”

“Being culturally fluent in both countries gives us a bit of an edge,” she adds. “I’m a believer in ‘let’s see where each place has the right to win’. We will find the edges and the opportunities within that.”

Advertisement

As for her chosen path in the impact investment space, Walsh Drouillard is characteristically clear. “It’s not always easy. But it’s a privilege.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

What’s going to come in the next Apple Watch?

Published

on

A new report claims that Apple intends to make few changes to the current Apple Watch Series 11, beyond a new Watch face.

Previous reports have said that the Apple Watch Series 12 may get significant software updates, but that the hardware would remain much as it is with the current model. Now Bloomberg is reporting that there won’t be many changes to hardware or software at all.

Specifically, the report says there will definitely be at least one new Watch face, plus performance improvements, but then probably little more than fixes and presumably also security updates. Beyond that, the report goes no further than alluding to the possibility of small hardware updates.

Previously, it’s been expected that the Apple Watch will not directly include any Apple Intelligence features. Reports vary, but it’s believe that the Apple Watch currently has between 1GB and 1.5GB of RAM, and so presumably that limits just how much Apple Intelligence could do on the small device.

Advertisement

However, the Apple Watch may be able to display results from Apple Intelligence prompts.

There’s no indication in the new report that this will happen with watchOS 27, which is due to be announced at WWDC. Other prior reports have agreed that there will be few or no Apple Watch hardware updates in 2026, but some predict an all-glass redesign in 2028.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Acasis FlowCore Series promises per-bay Thunderbolt 5 speed while challenging traditional multi-drive storage bottlenecks in modern workflows

Published

on


  • Acasis FlowCore Series introduces an independent bandwidth design for each NVMe bay system
  • Each drive reportedly maintains full Thunderbolt 5 speed simultaneously
  • Four-bay and ten-bay models target different storage capacity needs

Acasis has announced the FlowCore Series, a new line of Thunderbolt storage systems.

This device claims to solve the shared bandwidth problem of conventional multi-bay storage devices — where multiple drives operating simultaneously cause significant slowdowns — by offering an independent full-speed bandwidth architecture for each M.2 NVMe bay

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Which Ford Truck Depreciates Faster?

Published

on





The Ford F-150 is the best-selling pickup truck in the United States — and the best-selling vehicle overall until the RAV4 dethroned it in 2025 – and for good reason. The F-150 has become immensely popular due to its straightforward nature. It’s simple and capable, with an excellent max towing capacity of 13,500 pounds and impressive off-roading, especially the F-150 Raptor R and Tremor trims. However, another truck in Ford’s stable, the Ranger, has it beat in one category: depreciation. 

CarEdge’s analysis shows that the Ford F-150 has an estimated 50% depreciation over a five-year span, which is actually quite high compared to other pickup trucks like the Toyota Tacoma and Tundra. The first year is the worst, with the F-150 plummeting to 70% of its value in just one year. Based on a starting price of $62,008, an F-150 would be worth just $31,302 five years in. 

Meanwhile, the Ford Ranger loses just 28% of its value over the same period, according to CarEdge. It does better in its first year, too, only losing 20% (versus the F-150’s 30%). By the fifth year, a $46,897-when-new Ranger would be worth $33,592.

Advertisement

Why does the Ford Ranger hold its value?

The Ford Ranger is generally considered a truck that holds its value quite well. In 2026, iSeeCars named the Ranger on its list of the 25 vehicles with the lowest five-year depreciation. The pickup placed 22nd in a list of vehicles from every segment. The Ranger placed third in the pickup category, with only the Toyota Tacoma and Toyota Tundra holding value better. 

Advertisement

Part of the reason the Ranger holds its value better is likely its size. Mid-size trucks like the Ranger generally hold their value better than full-size trucks. For one, these trucks are smaller and easier to fit in a garage or driveway. Smaller trucks are also more affordable, which could make them more appealing to the average American who might be struggling to afford a new car. Interest in used mid-size trucks has climbed in the 2020s, and their value has also risen alongside this demand — keeping prices high in turn.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Jenny Zhang Gets Hair Clip Vision, Develops Innovative Hairclip Camera

Published

on

Jenny Zhang Hairclip Camera
Jenny Zhang left New York for Shenzhen last year with a clear plan. She wanted to build a camera that fit right into daily routines without forcing anyone to hold a device or wear something on their face. The result sits in her hair like an ordinary barrette, chunky and white, ready to record whatever passes in front of it.

Zhang is the founder of Computer Angel, a small startup company where she spent months hammering away in workshops to develop her idea into a fully functional prototype. The clip easily snaps into place and keeps securely in place even when you move around; you wouldn’t want to take it off once it’s attached. With the camera positioned directly over the top of your head, the moment you hit the button or even tap it, it begins snapping away.

Sale


Insta360 X5 – Waterproof 8K 360° Action Camera, Leading Low Light, Invisible Selfie Stick Effect, Rugged…
  • 8K30fps 360° Video with Dual 1/1.28″ Sensors: Capture stunning detail with dual 1/1.28″ sensors shooting up to 8K30fps. Film epic adventures…
  • Triple AI Chip Design, Better Low Light: Shoot confidently even in challenging lighting. X5’s triple AI chip design powers advanced noise reduction…
  • Invisible Selfie Stick: Create impossible third-person views with no selfie stick in sight! Capture everything in 360°, then choose your angles later…

Jenny Zhang Hairclip Camera
The resulting footage appears to be fairly low-resolution, with a quality comparable to those old-school flip phones. The colors are all warm and fuzzy on the edges, giving each clip a unique personality that is far more appealing than the super-sharp, clinical stuff. You receive a hands-free view of your daily life from an angle that your phone simply cannot reach, as if you had a personal cameraman following you around at all times.

Jenny Zhang Hairclip Camera
Zhang made a point of keeping things lighthearted with design, such as making the clip look like a piece of jewelry first and then a piece of technology, which turns out to be quite significant because people are far more inclined to go for something that looks beautiful on them. Now, the smart glasses that larger businesses are producing are all about packing in mics, speakers, and other aids that can identify things in real time or answer your queries on the fly. Computer Angel’s camera? No way, because there is only one task to do: save what you see, exactly as you see it.

Jenny Zhang Hairclip Camera
Zhang has yet to announce exact pricing or release dates. She’s keeping the details under wraps while she refines the build, but she’s always glad to share progress on social media, posting test videos and behind-the-scenes looks at the process of transitioning from a sketch to actual hardware.
[Source]

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Revamped Siri’s arrival may be in beta despite two year delay

Published

on

Current Siri has a colorful animation, but none of the New Siri smarts.

The long-awaited overhaul of Siri is already two years later than planned. Even so, it will still be beta software when it does actually arrive.

Back in WWDC 2024, Apple introduced its new Siri with contextual awareness and other major improvements for the digital assistant. However, while it ultimately didn’t arrive later in the year in iOS 18, and didn’t even make it to iOS 26, it is now expected to turn up in iOS 27.

However, despite Apple having an extra two years to work on the new AI-infused Siri, it won’t be a fully completed product release. According to Mark Gurman in Sunday’s “Power On” newsletter for Bloomberg, it will be arriving as a “beta” release.

Advertisement

A test version of iOS 27 being trialled internally before WWDC includes a toggle to turn off the new Siri experience. Disabling it will revert back to the current Siri.

However, while this will be used in the developer builds after WWDC, it apparently won’t be limited to that. When the public release of the 27-generation operating systems happens in the fall, it is believed Apple will retain the button at first.

If true this means Siri will be beta software when it comes time for it to be used by all iPhone and iPad users.

It’s a move that won’t inspire confidence in New Siri, especially if Apple deems it beta after working on it for so long.

Advertisement

A turbulent arrival

Apple’s development of New Siri has been a slow and painfully public process for the historically secretive company.

After a horrific period, Apple software chief Craig Federighi eventually took control of the AI teams in January. The same month, Apple confirmed a multi-year dealwith Google will help speed up the development of Apple Foundation Models.

However, Apple is still dealing with the typical churn of engineers in its AI teams, as they move to new and more lucrative opportunities. In February, it was reported Apple was still struggling with internal testing of Siri.

Despite all of this, there is still a general belief that Apple will finally get a usable version of New Siri out of its labs sometime in 2026.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Privacy & data security will remain tantamount for Apple’s AI

Published

on

Apple will relaunch Apple Intelligence and Siri platforms with new Apple Foundation Models. Despite Google’s involvement, Apple will maintain its privacy stance.

When Apple Intelligence was revealed during WWDC 2024, Apple had a hybrid system in place that would ultimately fail to deliver. Delays ensued, and it seems that the long wait is over for Apple’s true AI strategy to emerge.

According to the Power On newsletter, Apple won’t be compromising on privacy with its new AI efforts. While the report is colored with suppositions and conjecture about what is coming, it lays out a fairly clear picture.

Apple will not be compromising on privacy for the sake of better artificial intelligence.

Advertisement

There aren’t any new details about Apple’s AI efforts. It repeats everything we know about the upcoming strategy and paints a picture of loss, shortcomings, and desperation on Apple’s part.

Of course, I don’t see it in quite the same light.

Apple’s place in the AI race

The AI industry lurched ahead of Apple with increasingly powerful models that could perform seemingly amazing tasks. The demos have always been something spectacular, like out of science fiction, but the real-world use has been something a little more mundane.

Red running track finish line with white numbered lanes 1 to 6, overlaid by colorful abstract AI-style logos stacked vertically near the center of the lanes

Apple doesn’t need to win the race if it controls the track

Advertisement

People have become upset that their sacrifice of the world’s knowledge and data has led to very little. Some AI is great and accelerates human workflows, but the cost to our financial markets, component availability, and environment has been incredible.

Apple has missed out on the hype cycle around AI, but has thrived in spite of it. It keeps having record quarterly results without any significant updates to its AI systems, which contradicts the grifts being sold to investors.

Apple doesn’t need AI, but AI needs Apple.

With ChatGPT set to become cash-poor by 2028 without an influx of cash and the general public becoming increasingly angry at AI companies, Apple’s position couldn’t be stronger. It isn’t one of desperation and failure, but one of success due to patience.

Advertisement

I’m not saying that Apple wouldn’t have been happy to see its initial launch go more smoothly. Nor am I saying Apple wouldn’t have released upgraded AI sooner if it could have.

It all just seems to be a happy accident. But instead of wallowing in self-pity, Apple is doing what it does best.

Apple is about to bust into the industry late with a solution that actually meets people where they are.

Apple’s privacy stance will hold

Expect WWDC 2026 to reveal a lot of what Apple hopes to accomplish through the following year with AI. However, it won’t reveal everything, like explicit details about working with Google Gemini.

Advertisement
Glowing multicolor abstract logo on black background, with a looping neon ring forming petal shapes around a central four-pointed star gradient, reflected faintly below.

Apple isn’t replacing its models with Gemini

Apple partnered with Google to get a version of Gemini that could run on Private Cloud Compute servers. No, it isn’t replacing Apple Foundation Models with Gemini no matter how often it is repeated, but being used to distill knowledge and train.

There are also rumors of Apple renting AI compute space from Google, which is likely given the state of the market. However, users don’t need to worry that Apple is sending data to Google servers.

Whatever servers and GPU clusters Apple uses, they will be operated no differently than Private Cloud Compute with data privacy protections in place. It is no different than Apple renting data servers from Google or Amazon for iCloud.

Advertisement

Those companies don’t have access to the data. Period.

Apple’s AI strategy

Anyway, the new Apple Foundation Models will be the central backbone of Apple’s new AI strategy. They will run both on-device and in Private Cloud Compute to parse data and complete tasks on behalf of the user.

Close-up of an iPhone bottom screen showing a large central circular button, with smaller Ask and Search icons on either side, against a black interface and purple background

An on-device AI that stays out of the way

Most users will likely interact with Apple’s AI systems and Siri using these base models and nothing else. It will be the default, and after the Gemini training, will likely be more than enough for the features Apple will reveal during WWDC.

Advertisement

Anyone who wants to ignore AI on Apple platforms will be able to do so.

For those who want other options, Apple is providing developers with an API. The OpenAI relationship is fraying, and Apple will likely boot them from their privileged positions with iOS 27.

Instead, apps like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude will be able to be installed from the App Store and become endpoints for Apple Foundation Models. That means whether you’re invoking Siri or general Apple Intelligence programs, you can send data to third-party AI for parsing and execution.

Such integrations will maintain user privacy through the use of the API. Apple will likely establish that developers must adhere to strict privacy rules to access the API or face being revoked from access.

Advertisement

If Apple doesn’t go that route, then at the least, Apple will warn users of the privacy risks of using third-party models.

Person holding a black iPhone close to their face in a dim setting, with bold yellow text across the screen reading Privacy. Thats iPhone

Apple has spent over a decade telling users that their iPhone is private and secure

The end result is a new set of (hopefully) capable Apple Foundation Models powering every AI interaction on iPhone with privacy and security intact. Users will also be able to tap into their favorite, arguably more capable, AI models as they need or want to.

Apple won’t need to be the best in the AI space. Instead, it will have a strong enough base offering with the option of supporting external AI models as an expansion of its ecosystem.

Advertisement

Sure, Apple is late in doing this, but coloring it as some kind of desperate move seems odd. It’s Apple doing what Apple does best, and that’s disrupting an established market with a better business model targeted at user needs above profits and grift.

Apple will own the AI ecosystem by playing host to every model on its powerful hardware while offering good-enough models on-device.

WWDC 2026 will begin on June 8 with a keynote address. Expect it to be an AI-focused event considering the amount that will need to be covered in the space.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025