Connect with us

Tech

AI researchers back an extinction warning as the Pentagon rejects it

Published

on

A warning from a departing Anthropic researcher has drawn a wave of responses this week. Senior scientists at rival labs backed the claim that AI could threaten humanity, while a top Pentagon official rejected it. The reaction followed Jacob Coxon’s resignation from Anthropic. In a post on X, he said AI firms were “racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives”.

The post has since passed 150 million views, according to Bloomberg.

Coxon said he had spent about three years in AI research across both OpenAI and Anthropic. He wrote that the people building AI earnestly believe it could kill everyone by the end of the decade. His posts reached more than 100 million people within days, according to Wired.

He told Axios he had left Anthropic two months before his equity would have vested, after roughly four months at the company. He no longer had anything to gain by juicing up Anthropic’s valuation, he said in that interview.

Advertisement

Colleagues and rivals back the claim

Several researchers at Anthropic and OpenAI publicly supported the warning. Evan Hubinger leads Anthropic’s alignment science team. He wrote on X that the company’s staff really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans. He put the chance at more than 10 percent within the next decade.

Anthropic researcher Samuel Marks wrote that AI developers believe their technology could cause human extinction. In general, he said, the more senior the employee, the more concerned they were.

Paul Christiano also weighed in. He was formerly head of safety at the US Commerce Department’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation. Recent progress had led him to see a meaningful risk, he wrote. He said rapid acceleration in AI capabilities could lead to a catastrophic and irreversible loss of control in the very near term.

Most people could die, he added.

Advertisement

OpenAI announced that Christiano was joining the board of its nonprofit foundation. Geoffrey Hinton is one of the researchers often called a godfather of AI. He told BBC Newsnight that a 10 percent risk of human extinction seemed a not unreasonable estimate.

OpenAI researchers joined the calls to slow development. Julie Steele works on the company’s safety team. In her personal capacity, she wrote, she also thought the industry needed to slow down, CNBC reported. The statements followed an open letter in July. Roughly 1,400 employees across frontier AI companies signed it.

The letter urged the US government to build tools to deliberately pace automated AI development.

The Pentagon pushes back

Not everyone accepted the warning. Emil Michael, the US Defense Department’s chief technology officer, rejected it at a defence industry conference in Washington on Thursday, Bloomberg reported. It was easy to get caught up in this sort of doom loop, he said. He described Coxon’s message as all the fears that had coalesced in one well-written tweet.

Advertisement

Michael, a former Uber executive, said the free market, industry collaboration and engagement with government could mitigate the potential harms.

Michael also told reporters that the Defense Department had moved about 90 percent of its classified AI workload away from Anthropic. He said it was on track to shift the rest by the end of the month. His remarks followed the Pentagon’s dispute with Anthropic over safeguards on military use of its models, a case now before the courts.

Gary Marcus, an AI researcher, told Business Insider he saw cyberattacks and disinformation as serious risks. But he knew of no realistic scenario for actually killing all humans, he said.

The response reaches Washington

The warning drew a quick political reaction. Representative Lori Trahan, a Massachusetts Democrat, wrote that safety researchers were resigning, powerful AI models were breaking out of their labs, and companies were racing ahead anyway. She pointed to the bipartisan FRONTIER Act, which would establish oversight of advanced models.

Advertisement

A separate bill, the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, would pause advanced development until safety rules were set. Senator Bernie Sanders said he would introduce legislation to pause AI development. Senator Ted Cruz called the risk “scary as hell”, according to Politico.

David Sacks, chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, addressed the matter on X. Anthropic’s planned public offering must be paused until the claims of the whistleblower can be investigated, he wrote.

Anthropic declined to comment on that post. The company is expected to begin marketing its initial public offering in mid-October at the earliest. The listing would follow shortly before the US midterm elections in November.

Anthropic’s position

Anthropic did not respond to a request for comment on Coxon’s resignation, and OpenAI did not immediately respond either, according to the Associated Press. An Anthropic spokesperson told CNBC that the company had always been transparent that AI would bring both enormous benefits and unprecedented risks.

Advertisement

The spokesperson said it was building models with some of the strongest safeguards in the industry. Anthropic was the first lab to publish a framework for mitigating catastrophic risks from AI models, the spokesperson added.

Coxon was not the first researcher to raise such concerns. Hinton left Google in 2023 to speak freely about the risks. In May, the Turing Award winner Yoshua Bengio issued a similar AI extinction warning.

OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki wrote this month that the systems of the next few years were likely to increasingly drive their own development, and that the moment called for extreme caution.

What set this week apart was the scale of the reaction, measured by view count and by the seniority of those who echoed the warning, rather than the argument itself.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

It looks like Google has finally killed the Pixel Tablet

Published

on

Google may have quietly pulled the plug on the Pixel Tablet. The three-year-old tablet has disappeared from the Google Store, while the company has also removed the “Tablet” category from the navigation menu on its homepage.

The Pixel Tablet’s removal was first spotted by Jetstream, which had already reported that the device was marked as out of stock just days earlier. Google has yet to confirm whether the tablet has officially been discontinued, but taking the product down entirely is a pretty strong hint that its time may be up.

The signs don’t stop there. Google’s Pixel Tablet accessories are still listed, but most are also unavailable. The Pixel Tablet Case and Charging Speaker Dock, for example, can currently only be set up for stock notifications rather than purchased. The only accessory still available to buy is the Wasserstein Pixel Tablet Speaker Stand.

The tablet is also becoming harder to find elsewhere. It is no longer available from Amazon, while Best Buy lists it as “no longer available in new condition”. That makes the Google Store disappearance look less like a temporary stock issue and more like the end of the road for the device.

Advertisement

Google originally announced the Pixel Tablet at I/O 2023, positioning it as a tablet that could double as a smart home hub when docked. It launched at $899, with the charging speaker base included, making the two-in-one setup a key part of its appeal.

Advertisement

For now, though, Google hasn’t officially called time on the Pixel Tablet, but if it does confirm the discontinuation, it would mean the Pixel Tablet lasted only around three years. And with no replacement on the way, anyone who was hoping for a second-generation model may have to wait a little longer or accept that Google’s tablet experiment is over.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Shopify extends lifeline to Tailwind as vibe coding erodes web dev platform’s bottom line

Published

on

DEVOPS

Acquisition gives open source CSS framework ‘a stable long-term home’

Tailwind CSS may still be open source, but it’s not independent anymore: It’s now a Shopify product.

Advertisement

Tailwind Labs CEO Adam Wathan shared news of Shopify’s acquisition of his company in a blog post Thursday. Wathan said that he chose to sell to Shopify because the ecommerce platform was an early adopter of Tailwind CSS, and will serve as an ideal place for his open-source web development platform to “be developed in service of a real product.” 

“I believe deeply in Shopify’s mission to help more people start, run, and grow their own business,” Wathan added. “Tailwind is a very important part of the stack at Shopify, and they’re invested in making sure it’s actively maintained and continues to improve and adapt for how the ways we build are changing.” 

For those unfamiliar with Tailwind CSS, it’s an open source framework that simplifies web development by providing utility classes that can be applied directly to elements in HTML documents. Traditional CSS, on the other hand, often involves maintaining separate stylesheets containing rules that are applied to HTML elements.

It’s a useful tool, and one that’s installed over 110 million times a week, per Wathan, if you can believe that. But as we’ve seen several times, the rise of AI is making it hard for the platform’s overlords to make ends meet. 

Advertisement

Wathan said in January that AI coding tools had started eating into Tailwind Labs’ bottom line to the degree that he was forced to lay off three employees. He blamed the fact that vibe coding tools have begun to come between his product and potential customers, causing traffic to plummet and income to dry up. 

So Shopify has come to the rescue to save Tailwind CSS from languishing in maintenance hell like other open source projects.

“We’re joining Shopify to give Tailwind a stable long-term home where it will be actively maintained for the millions of people who depend on it,” Wathan explained in his blog post.

The precise details depend on what type of Tailwind CSS user you are. 

Advertisement

“Nothing changes with Tailwind CSS or any of our other open-source projects,” Wathan said. “Everything will always be MIT-licensed, and our team will continue to lead and maintain these projects for the community with the support of Shopify.”

But users of Tailwind’s premium services might find things changing, as Wathan said his team will no longer be trying to grow the business. That means Tailwind Plus, the company’s paid, UI-based package of templates and other tools, and ui.sh, Tailwind’s package of AI skills designed to help non-coders build user interfaces, are going the way of the dodo. 

“We’re closing sign ups for new customers to focus on Tailwind CSS at Shopify,” Wathan explained. Existing customers who’ve paid for access to those tools and other paid Tailwind Labs offerings will still have access, Wathan stressed.

We reached out to get more details on future support for those paid products, and will update this post if we hear back. ®

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Jell-O and Beer May Hold the Keys to Brewing Houses on Mars

Published

on

Establishing life on another planet is a multifaceted process with many problems. Housing is one major challenge, but a new study suggests researchers have found a way to build living quarters on Mars using materials already present on the planet, along with a couple of other clever ingredients. 

The study, published on Sept. 10 in the journal Chem Circularity, reports that researchers found a way to turn the sand on Mars into what is functionally low-grade concrete using little more than gelatin, yeast, and the natural Martian environment. Combine the three ingredients, and the dry, cold, low-pressure environment of Mars freeze-dries the mixture, turning it into a porous, foam-like material strong enough to build houses on the red planet. 

“My inspiration came from freeze-dried fruits that become harder,” senior author Jishen Qiu of The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology said in a statement. “So, I asked myself if we can take advantage of that and make some materials.”

According to Qiu, the concrete produced by this method measures 10 to 12 megapascals (a metric unit of pressure), putting it on par with low-grade concrete here on Earth. This concrete is strong enough to build a one- or two-story house on Earth, and since Earth has three times the gravity of Mars, it’s more than strong enough to build structures on Mars too. 

Advertisement

The gelatin is run-of-the-mill porcine gelatin, which means it’s made from pigs, and it’s quite literally the same stuff that Jell-O uses to make its jiggly dessert. For the yeast, Qiu created a specially engineered version covered in the same proteins mussels use to attach themselves to rocks. These two ingredients, along with pounded-up Martian rocks and water, create the material. 

Mars’ frigid cold, low-pressure environment effectively freeze-dries the material, causing water to sublimate, which means it turns directly from a solid to a vapor, leaving the Martian concrete behind. Because this process is so fast, items must be 3D-printed in real time to work properly.

The team tested it by 3D printing two small beehive-shaped structures about the size of a wine cork in a simulated Martian environment, but the team believes the process can scale up. Once the structures have reached the end of their usefulness, people on Mars can break them down, mix them in a bioreactor, and brew a new building with the same materials, as long as there’s still yeast alive to reproduce. 

An elegant solution to a long-standing problem

A graphic showing what a house on Mars would look like and its molecular structure.
Houses on Mars made with this method would resemble beehives, but be made of what is essentially concrete. Nin Liu

Delivering humans to Mars is already a tall order. Elon Musk tried to get it done by 2025 and missed the mark by at least a decade. However, getting people there is only half the battle. Once there, they need a place to live that can withstand the Martian environment, which includes temperature swings of nearly 100 degrees Celsius and virtually no radiation protection from the sun due to the thin Mars atmosphere. 

There are many ideas about the subject, ranging from inflatable domiciles to the idea of letting self-propagating fungi grow whole buildings. Some enterprising scientists from the Indian Space Research Organisation even made space bricks from Martian soil, guar gum, urea, nickel chloride and a bacterium called Sporosarcina pasteurii, which converts urea and calcium into calcite. This lets the soil harden into something resembling concrete.

Advertisement

NASA held a habitat challenge from 2015 to 2019 that tasked companies and researchers to 3D-print homes using unique methods and materials. The winners took home over $2 million in prizes. In short, no stone has been left unturned, and people are using all sorts of exotic materials to try to find the best solution for habitats on Mars, including Qiu.

“I always ask myself: Is there any physical law or fundamental mechanism that prevents us from doing this?” Qiu said. “I can’t see any at this point in time. We are confident in scaling it up. It would surprise me if materials for future Martian engineering will not be as diverse as those used in Earth engineering, and biology will certainly contribute.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Irish workers considering new routes as AI reshapes work, finds Microsoft

Published

on

A new report found that Irish employees’ workplace expectations and experiences are being transformed by artificial intelligence.

Microsoft Ireland has today (10 September) released the findings of its 2026 Work Trend Index. The report explores how Ireland’s employees are responding to a working environment under constant evolution in response to AI.  

This year’s Work Trend Index, in collaboration with 3Gem, surveyed 1,000 nationally representative adults based in Ireland, in casual and part-time work, including frontline employees and knowledge workers. 

The survey builds on the year-on-year comparisons of the changing trends, experiences and workplace expectations between 2022 and 2026.

Advertisement

What was discovered is that nearly half (48pc) of workers who participated in the research have changed employers in the last 12 months, a figure which has risen from 38pc in 2025.

47pc of professionals explained that AI is making them seriously reconsider their career path. This has risen from 34pc just last year. 

The AI influence

The report found that there is significant optimism around the potential of AI, as 76pc of participants believe it offers Ireland a major economic opportunity. Almost two-thirds believe skills in this area are critical when competing in the wider jobs market and 61pc are of the opinion that developing AI skills will support career progression.

There are some concerns also, as almost 60pc of people fear falling behind if they are too slow to adapt, and 13pc are considering changing their employer if there is insufficient access to advanced AI tools. This is perhaps not unexpected, as Microsoft’s report suggests that AI use at work has risen to 63pc. 

Advertisement

Many employers, however, are failing to meet the expectations of a workforce that is becoming increasingly used to embedded AI.

While 57pc of participant workers can identify where AI agents could help in their role and 48pc are already using AI agents regularly, organisations are in catch-up mode, with employers yet to provide the right levels of upkilling, investment and leadership, according to the index. 

Only 40pc of contributors feel that they have had enough AI training or guidance, less than half agreed that their employer provides the tools and resources they need, and only 48pc find that leadership expectations around AI use are clear. 

The report said: “The findings suggest Ireland’s AI opportunity is not constrained by employee appetite, but by how quickly organisations can translate that enthusiasm into practical capability, trusted adoption and business value.”

Advertisement

The Work Trend Index identified the ways in which organisations can accelerate their AI adoption to match employee needs and that is largely by viewing the workforce as an asset that requires consistent upgrading.  

65pc of employees are open to new ideas and ways of working with AI, 89pc said AI has improved the quality of their work, 61pc are curious about what AI could unlock for them or their team, and 65pc said they treat AI output as a starting point while remaining responsible for the final work. 

“Leadership will be critical to converting employee interest into confident adoption. However, more than half of workers (51pc) say leadership is out of touch with employees, while fewer than half say their manager actively uses AI, encourages AI adoption or supports experimentation,” the report said. 

“The findings point to a clear opportunity for leaders to model responsible use, set expectations and give employees the confidence and permission to explore where AI can add value.”

Advertisement

Catherine Doyle, general manager at Microsoft Ireland, said, “Ireland’s workforce is adapting quickly to a changing world of work. People are thinking differently about the skills they need, the career paths they want and the opportunities they expect from their employers. 

“At the same time, there is strong recognition of AI’s potential, both for individual careers and for Ireland’s future competitiveness. What is particularly encouraging is that workers are not waiting on the sidelines. They’re developing new future-ready skills and exploring how AI can help them in their current and future roles. 

“The challenge now is whether organisations can keep pace with this momentum. The next phase is about turning AI adoption into meaningful value by building organisational capability and trust, strengthening governance and security, and redesigning work around better outcomes.

“The organisations that get this right will be better placed to create meaningful value for their people, customers and the wider economy.”

Advertisement

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

How These XL Phones Compete

Published

on

Different ecosystems, but similar flagship hardware.

The new iPhone 18 Pro Max may not seem as exciting as the iPhone Duo. Indeed, it still has that classic iPhone form factor and, aside from some new colors, looks identical to the iPhone Pro 17 Max. Even so, you get everything you’d expect from a flagship. Large screen, multiple cameras, it checks all the boxes. But the iPhone 18 Pro Max isn’t the only flagship phone on the market. Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra is also a very capable device, and it’s hard not to compare the two.

Given that we’re comparing the most impressive non-folding phones Apple and Samsung makes, the choice will likely come down to some small details and personal preferences. Maybe you’re an iOS person, or you’ve got your eye on that new dark red iPhone 18 Pro Max. Or maybe you’d rather have the freedom of Android, or you like having the S Pen on the Galaxy. There are pros and cons on both sides. And even before diving into the details, the truth is neither of them disappoint.

Advertisement

Design and displays that aren’t all that different

Both the iPhone 18 Pro Max and the Galaxy S26 Ultra look like regular smartphones. They’re straight, rectangular devices without a foldable screen in sight. They both have the same 6.9-inch size. But the iPhone has slightly rounder corners, while the Galaxy goes for a straighter shape. Apple went with a design that combines aluminum and glass on the back. Samsung, on the other hand, has an all-glass back.

One great thing about the S26 Ultra over the iPhone is its weight. It’s 214 grams, compared to 249 grams for the iPhone 18 Pro Max. It might not seem like much, but you can probably feel the difference when holding your phone for a long time. The Samsung phone is also thinner — 7.9 mm versus the iPhone’s 8.75 mm. Again, it’s not a huge difference, but it matters to some people, especially when you consider adding a case to them.

The differences in the displays are also subtle. The iPhone uses an OLED panel with a resolution of 2,868 by 1,320 pixels. That’s high enough to make the screen look great. It also has a 120Hz refresh rate and reaches 3,000 nits of brightness. In other words, it’s a good, bright and smooth display. Samsung uses a slightly higher-resolution AMOLED display. It’s 3,120 by 1,440 pixels, but the resolution difference between these screens is extremely hard to notice in real life.

The S26 Ultra also has a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling, but the brightness is limited to 2,600 nits. And brightness matters a lot if you use your phone a lot outdoors. The S Pen is also a huge plus for the S26 Ultra. Not everyone cares about it, but it’s nice to have it. It can be a good way to take notes more naturally. On the iPhone side, you need the very expensive iPhone Duo to use the Apple Pencil.

Advertisement

The biggest difference is in the cameras

Cameras are where these phones really stand out. Both have incredible specs that make the eyes of photographers and filmmakers light up. Starting with the iPhone 18 Pro Max, Apple has kept the classic three-camera setup on the back: wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto, all of which have 48-megapixel sensors. And there’s some big news about this year’s main sensor: variable aperture.

Most phone cameras use a fixed aperture. That means the focal length and the amount of light hitting the sensor are fixed, with no way to change that. But the iPhone 18 Pro Max lets you adjust the aperture mechanically. It opens up room for more artistic control over your shots in a way that you only typically have with a dedicated camera. Not many phones currently on the market can do this.

The S26 Ultra also has great cameras — with a slightly different setup. The main lens has a 200-megapixel sensor. Such high resolution lets you crop your photos without losing quality. The ultra-wide features a 50 megapixel sensor, similar to the iPhone. But zoom capabilities set the S26 Ultra apart. That’s because it’s packed with not one, but two telephoto lenses. One for 3x zoom, the other for 5x zoom. The iPhone has a single telephoto lens for 4x zoom.

Advertisement

As for video, the iPhone keeps the specs it’s had for a while now: 4K up to 120 fps, HDR and Dolby Vision. Samsung goes further and lets you shoot 8K on the S26 Ultra. Not that 8K is any kind of standard yet — more of a “nice to have” than something most people will actually use.

Battery, biometrics and more

The battery capacity of both phones is also very similar. Both the iPhone 18 Pro Max and the S26 Ultra are around 5,000 mAh, with slight variations. That’s generally enough power to last a full day without needing to plug in for most people. Fast charging is finally on even footing too — both go from zero to 50 percent in about 15 minutes with a 60W charger.

Advertisement

In terms of performance, the S26 Ultra is powered by a 3-nanometer Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. It’s a pretty decent chip that even outperforms Apple’s A19 Pro in some tests. But the iPhone 18 Pro has a new A20 Pro chip, the company’s first 2-nanometer chip. In theory, it’s faster and more efficient, but we won’t really know that until we’ve done some real-world testing. As for RAM, Samsung offers 12GB or 16GB depending on the storage option. The iPhone 18 Pro Max has 12GB of RAM in all configurations. That’s enough RAM for most of the things people do on their phones.

Then there are the little things that sets them apart. Face ID on the iPhone versus an in-screen fingerprint reader on the Galaxy. Face ID is super easy to use, but it might not work as well in some situations. Also, iPhones still have the Dynamic Island on the screen — although it’s smaller now. Samsung goes with a simple punch-hole camera that eats up less screen space.

Advertisement

They’re both great, but for different users

Even the prices of these phones are similar. They both start at $1,299 in the U.S. for the 256GB model. The decision really comes down to personal preference. The iPhone 18 Pro Max works best if you’re fully immersed in the Apple ecosystem. If you have AirPods or an Apple Watch, it’s an obvious choice. But the Galaxy S26 Ultra can offer you extra features like better zoom or the S Pen. There’s also the choice between iOS and Android. No matter which one you choose, they can both handle everything just fine.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Thrive Capital led VCs into pro sports ownership; Collaborative Fund just upped that play

Published

on

Collaborative Fund, the 15-year-old, New York-based generalist venture firm that has roughly $1 billion under management and which made early bets on Lyft, Reddit, Sweetgreen, and Olipop, among others, is taking a stake in the soccer club D.C. United and its stadium, Audi Field.

It’s the latest — and smallest — firm to try something that Thrive Capital opened the door to just months ago: turning venture money into pro sports ownership.

To recap, Joshua Kushner’s Thrive launched a new vehicle, Thrive Eternal, explicitly built to hold “iconic franchises and cultural institutions” for decades, funded by many of the same investors already in Thrive’s venture and growth funds. The firm kicked things off by announcing a stake in the San Francisco Giants. Months later, the same vehicle — with former Disney CEO Bob Iger, a Thrive partner, joining as co-owner — bought the Lakers outright for a record $12.5 billion.

That’s new. Historically, money has poured into pro sports two other ways: individual tech fortunes, and private equity. For example, Vinod Khosla and his family agreed this summer to buy the Seattle Seahawks for a record $9.6 billion soon after the Khosla family also took a stake in the San Francisco 49ers alongside OpenAI chairman Bret Taylor. That was a personal-wealth play, the kind we’ve seen over and over.

Advertisement

Private equity firms have also been at this for years, including Sixth Street, which holds stakes in the Boston Celtics, the New England Patriots, and MLB’s San Francisco Giants; Ares, which owns a piece of the Miami Dolphins outright and separately financed Chelsea’s stadium plans through a $500 million preferred-equity deal; RedBird, which owns AC Milan outright and holds a minority stake in Fenway Sports Group, the holding company behind Liverpool and the Red Sox; and Arctos, with minority positions scattered across MLB, the NFL, the NBA, and European soccer. (Apollo, the newest entrant, has mostly stuck to sports financing deals so far rather than ownership stakes.)

Thrive and Collaborative are doing neither of those things. At the same time, the two firms’ approaches to sports ownership look very different. Thrive built a standalone, permanent-capital vehicle specifically to hold trophy assets. Collaborative is investing out of the same early-stage fund it uses to write seed and Series A checks, and treating the deal less like something to buy and hold and almost more like infrastructure.

In a memo shared with TechCrunch, Collaborative Fund founder and managing partner Craig Shapiro framed the deal as an extension of what the firm already does. “A franchise is the ultimate consumer product,” he wrote, arguing that D.C. United’s status as one of Major League Soccer’s original clubs gives Collaborative access to an institution with a decades-long fan base to build on.

He pointed to the tailwinds around American soccer specifically (a World Cup just behind the sport, the LA Olympics ahead of it, soaring youth participation numbers in the U.S.) as well as D.C.’s ownership of Audi Field in Washington, D.C., plus a talent-development pipeline through Loudoun County, Virginia, and rights to a future Baltimore expansion team.

Advertisement

Indeed, the thesis Shapiro laid out at a TechCrunch StrictlyVC event Thursday night in New York is less about owning a piece of an appreciating asset – the sports team itself – and more about what the team makes possible. Collaborative wants to turn Audi Field into what he describes as a living showcase for its own portfolio.

As a backer of both fitness band maker Whoop and the beverage brand Olipop, for example, Collaborative Fund is imagining a WHOOP wearables activation for fans, or Olipop drinks woven into game-day concessions. He’s thinking about the stadium’s foot traffic — tens of thousands of people showing up on a predictable schedule — as a distribution channel at a time when, because AI is making more of daily life feel synthetic, live experiences are becoming more valuable.

Shapiro doesn’t dwell on this, but it surely helped sell Collaborative’s investors that team valuations have been soaring, so the stake could pay off on its own. Soccer valuations in particular have been on a tear. Inter Miami’s franchise value has roughly doubled in the two years since Lionel Messi arrived, MLS’s average club value is up roughly 134% since 2019, and D.C. United’s own valuation has climbed from $35 million in 2008 to $785 million today, factoring in its ownership of Audi Field and the surrounding real estate.

If Shapiro is right that a franchise is also “the ultimate consumer product,” it could be a pretty good place to park money. Time will tell.

Advertisement

The deal is subject to MLS approval.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Anthropic Caught Scientists Using Claude To Further Biological Weapon Research

Published

on

The company has produced an extensive collection of case studies covering the ways its current AI models have been misused.

Anthropic has flagged and stopped multiple scientists who were using its AI models to create potential biological weapons, according to a new report the company shared on Thursday. “Biological misuse” is just one flavor of troubling AI usage the report documents, but it’s of growing importance because newer models like Fable 5 are increasingly good at helping with scientific research.

The company’s report includes five case studies of Anthropic’s models being used to develop biological weapons, the safety measures that brought the misuse to Anthropic’s attention and how it responded. Detecting possible misuse is complicated, as the company stressed to The New York Times, because research into a new vaccine could look a lot like creating a bioweapon. In all cases the company says it erred on the side of being overly cautious because of the possible consequences.

“You are not seeing someone in a comic book kind of way say, ‘Hey, I want to build a biological weapon to kill everybody,’” Jacob Klein, Anthropic’s head of threat intelligence, told The New York Times. “It’s an incredibly nuanced situation.”

Advertisement

In one case study from May, Anthropic says its “biological safety classifier” flagged a request for Claude to author a grant for gain-of-function research on chikungunya virus. The virus has no licensed treatment and can cause debilitating symptoms for weeks or months, the company says. Gain-of-function research explores methods for genetically altering an organism, and in the case of this specific virus, the grant proposed increasing its transmissibility and ability to evade immune response. The combination sounds dangerous, and Anthropic says the fact that the proposed research was affiliated with a military research institute made it extra questionable.

The company took similar issue with gain-of-function research into bird flu and a separate case of a researcher using Claude to develop an atlas of venom toxin peptides and “a generative pipeline that optimized toxin characteristics.” The full report also includes case studies on Anthropic’s models being used as a surveillance tool and to create software exploits, propaganda and weapons systems.

According to the company, anyone misusing Claude or Anthropic models had their account banned, and the findings from the investigation are being used to further improve model safeguards and prevent future misuse. Given the tricky nature of biological misuse, Anthropic is also not naming the individuals or institutions its investigation connected to the development of possible biological weapons. “The individuals implicated in these case studies are working scientists,” Anthropic says. “We do not assert that they intended harm, and identifying them or their labs could expose them to harm.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints and Answers for Sept. 11, #718

Published

on

How To Play and Win Connections | Mashable - Mashable (1080p, h264).mp4

Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle is pretty tough, with a diverse group of categories that might stump players. If you’re struggling with the puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.

Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group hint: When a player gets hurt.

Green group hint: Who’s on first?

Blue group hint: Hoopsters in Sin City.

Purple group hint: You might do this with a doughnut.

Advertisement

Read more: We Need to Talk About That One Doggone Connections Puzzle

Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group: NFL injury report designations.

Green group: Ways to reach first base.

Blue group: Las Vegas Aces.

Advertisement

Purple group: ____ dunk.

What are today’s Connections: Sports Edition answers?

completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle #718 for Sept. 11, 2026.
The completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for Friday, Sept. 11, 2026.NYT/Screenshot by CNET

The yellow words in today’s Connections

The theme is NFL injury report designations.

The four answers are doubtful, out, probable and questionable.

The green words in today’s Connections

The theme is ways to reach first base.

The four answers are error, hit by pitch, single and walk.

Advertisement

The blue words in today’s Connections

The theme is Las Vegas Aces.

The four answers are Gray, Loyd, Wilson and Young.

The purple words in today’s Connections

The theme is ____ dunk.

The four answers are Nike, reverse, slam and windmill.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Is AI Actually Going to Kill Us All?

Published

on

Leah Feiger: I do like the nostalgic touch. I miss my Motorola Razr. I miss it every single day. Perhaps not the exact same capabilities, but it does the trick.

Brian Barrett: It is funny. It is. Imagine your Motorola Razr, but it opens side to side instead of up and down, and it’s all one big screen, so there’s no buttons to push. You can’t do T9 texting. Then you can watch YouTube on it.

Leah Feiger: I’m waiting, honestly, for the first story to drop from the quiet car of the Acela between DC and New York where someone, some sweet person from the administration, did not realize how big that screen is when you unfold it and how many messages are visible.

Brian Barrett: Oh, it’s going to be great.

Advertisement

Leah Feiger: It’s going to be, this is the new frontier for eavesdropping. Also, congratulations, Apple. But for me, that’s what I’m looking forward to.

Brian Barrett: Leah, what would it take to get you to purchase a foldable phone?

Leah Feiger: It would have to be a lot less than $2,000.

Brian Barrett: Yeah.

Advertisement

Leah Feiger: I can’t wait for Zoë to come back next week and tell us all about her new purchase. To be clear, I don’t think she’s gotten one, but it would be really funny if she did.

Brian Barrett: I bet she will.

Leah Feiger: So our next topic involves the US Census Bureau, which, definitely not as shiny or theoretically life-threatening as our previous topics, but really, really important. Last month, the bureau published a report that claimed to uncover evidence backing up President Donald Trump’s claims that noncitizen voting cost him the 2020 election. He touted the report on True Social saying, “I won the election.” This is, as you know, we’ve talked about this many times, one of Trump’s favorite conspiracy theories. He cannot let it go. And WIRED reporters, Vittoria Elliott and David Gilbert, dug into how this specific report actually got made, who wrote it, and they discovered a lot of holes with this. I kind of want to start by saying, if you’re listening to me and thinking, why do I care about a US Census Bureau report? They just do the census. They tell me how many people live in all of these different areas, how big families are, et cetera, et cetera. You’re not 100 percent wrong, but this is really important data. These are reports about people and their lives, and the average citizen shouldn’t have to know that much about it, but because of the situation we’re in with the current administration, knowing these weird little intricacies of what’s going on in government, I think has been really key to understanding the full picture here.

Brian Barrett: Also, to be clear, I do care.

Advertisement

Leah Feiger: You do care. There we go. All right. Can I run you through some of the quick down and dirty stuff, Brian, with what the report said?

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

‘I love this place; it’s in my blood. Goosebumps’; John Ternus on how he felt when he learned he was becoming Apple CEO, and why AI may be the key to future Apple innovation

Published

on

I’ve known John Ternus for almost a dozen years, but not this John Ternus, the newly minted Apple CEO and sudden global tech celebrity. So, color me pleased when he and his Global Marketing SVP Greg Joswiak agreed to sit down with Tom’s Guide Global Editor-in-Chief Mark Spoonauer and me for a podcast discussion that ranged from bringing Pencil to the iPhone and excitement around the foldable iPhone Duo to what AI means for innovation, and the big moment when Ternus realized he was about to become CEO of arguably one of the biggest and most important tech companies in the world.

It’s kind of wild to watch someone who you think of as a brilliant but also normal and approachable guy transform into an industry rockstar almost overnight, and while Ternus, who is a 25-year Apple veteran and came directly from leading Apple’s hardware operations, doesn’t seem outwardly fazed by the transition, he’s also attuned to the moment.

John Ternus at the Apple Fall 2026 iPhone Event

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)

“What an extraordinary privilege, right?” said Ternus with a wide grin. The reality is, I just love this place, right? It’s in my blood. …I love the people I work with. I love to be able to build the products that we all build together. And so, goosebumps…and excitement.”

Latest Videos FromTechRadar

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025