Connect with us

Tech

American data centers in just seven states are reportedly using more water than all the cities in California

Published

on


  • Think tank Ceres found power generation for data centers in seven states withdraws 3.4 trillion gallons of freshwater a year, or 10.4 million acre-feet
  • The figure might be a bit overstated, as it counts withdrawals, including hydropower water returned to the river immediately
  • 78% of electricity in those states comes from water-using plants, and 66% of those plants sit in water-stressed areas

Non-profit think tank Ceres has published a new report analyzing the water used to generate electricity for data centers across Virginia, Texas, California, Illinois, Georgia, Ohio, and Arizona.

Ceres estimates data centers use 3.4 trillion gallons of freshwater a year, or 10.4 million acre-feet.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Oracle may be next in EU software licensing hot seat following SAP deal

Published

on

software

Commission reportedly seeks third-party views, although no formal investigation is underway

The European Commission (EC) may be laying the groundwork for an investigation into Oracle’s software licensing practices, according to reports.

Advertisement

The scrutiny follows the EC’s investigation into fellow enterprise software vendor SAP, which ended with the Commission accepting legally binding commitments from the German company to abolish reinstatement fees and reduce back-maintenance fees, among other concessions.

MLex is now reporting that the EC – the EU’s executive arm – has started to examine Oracle’s licensing practices ahead of a possible formal investigation. One source told the publication that the EC was seeking views from third parties.

An EC spokesperson told The Register it had concluded an investigation into SAP, and “will continue to monitor possible further anti-competitive practices and abusive conduct in this sector. At this stage however, there is no formal investigation into any company.”

The Register invited Oracle to comment.

Advertisement

Big Red’s licensing practices have attracted criticism for years, although the vendor maintains they are fair. One frequently criticized example is its treatment of Java, which came under Oracle’s stewardship after it agreed to buy Sun Microsystems in 2009.

OpenJDK, the reference implementation of the Java platform, is open source, but vendors can charge for proprietary development kits, runtime environments, and support.

Oracle announced a new licensing regime for Oracle Java SE in January 2023. It said Java SE Universal Subscription would offer customers “a simple, low-cost monthly subscription that includes Java SE Licensing and Support for use on Desktops, Servers or Cloud deployments.”

Industry experts pointed out that even businesses with limited use of Oracle Java could have to pay according to their total employee count under the model, a dramatic departure from Oracle’s previous licensing terms. Gartner estimated the per-employee subscription model to be two to five times more expensive than the legacy version.

Advertisement

Another licensing mechanism that has attracted criticism is the Unlimited License Agreement. Some licensing advisors claim the all-you-can-eat option offers poor value, locks users in, and limits their choice of alternative products. Oracle maintains that the agreement offers flexibility and good value.

The EC accepted SAP’s commitments in July after opening an investigation into concerns that the German vendor may have restricted competition in the aftermarket for maintenance and support of its on-premises ERP software.

Gartner welcomed the commitments, saying they gave customers more options for their legacy SAP applications by making third-party support a more viable alternative to migration. Vendor support for some older SAP products is due to end in 2027. ®

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

How to Spot a Cloned Online Casino Website Safely

Published

on

To spot a cloned online casino, compare its exact domain with the website listed by the regulator or verified operator. Treat mismatched licence details, lookalike domains, unexplained redirects, unrelated app publishers, and unfamiliar payment recipients as reasons to stop.

Do not sign in, upload identity documents, install an application, or deposit money while a material mismatch remains unresolved. A cloned casino can copy the design, games, legal text, and licence number of a legitimate operator.

Quick Take: The Strongest Clone Indicators

  • The exact domain is absent from the regulator’s record.
  • The licence number belongs to another company or website.
  • The address uses substituted letters, extra hyphens, misleading subdomains, or an unfamiliar ending.
  • The regulator badge opens a page that imitates the regulator instead of its official domain.
  • The login, document-upload, or payment page redirects to an unrelated website.
  • A recently registered domain claims a long operating history.
  • The website directs you to a fake app store or asks you to sideload an application.
  • The payment recipient does not correspond to the operator or a disclosed processor.
  • Support uses a free or unrelated email domain.
  • You are told to deposit more money to unlock a withdrawal, verification, or refund.

A single weak clue can have an innocent explanation. A failed regulatory match, copied licence, unrelated payment recipient, or fake application publisher is a much stronger stop signal.

Genuine Casino and Cloned Casino browser cards compare domain, licence, payment, email, and app source.

What Is a Cloned Casino Website?

A cloned casino is a website or application that copies another organization’s identity to appear legitimate. The impersonated organization may be a licensed casino, a gambling regulator, a payment service, an app store, or a casino-software provider.

Some clones reproduce a real casino’s interface almost exactly. Others borrow only its brand name, logo, licence number, game catalogue, or customer-support language. The objective may be to collect deposits, steal account credentials, obtain identity documents, install malicious software, or redirect users to an unauthorized gambling service.

Advertisement

This is a documented regulatory problem. In July 2026, the Malta Gaming Authority reported a pattern of websites impersonating its licensees and publishing false regulatory claims. The authority’s impersonation warning instructs consumers to confirm both the operator and website through its official register.

Before You Check a Suspected Website

Limit further exposure while you investigate:

  • Do not log in or test a password on the suspected site.
  • Do not click its licence seal or customer-support link.
  • Do not install software or grant browser-notification permission.
  • Do not send a small deposit as a test.
  • Copy the URL as text or take a screenshot of the address bar.
  • Record whether you arrived through an advertisement, search result, email, text, social post, or application.
  • Use a separate browser tab to locate the regulator or genuine operator independently.
  • Hide account numbers and other sensitive information before sharing screenshots.

If the casino’s legal identity is uncertain, begin with the full guide to verifying an online casino licence. Licensing verification should happen before comparing the operator’s payment methods.

How to Check Whether a Casino Website Is a Clone

  1. Identify the registrable domain

    Read the address bar from right to left. A typical address contains a protocol, hostname, path, and optional tracking information. In `https://login.casino-example.com/account`, the registrable domain is `casino-example.com`. The word `login` is only a subdomain.

    This distinction exposes addresses designed to mislead. In `casino-example.secure-payments.com`, the controlling domain is `secure-payments.com`, not `casino-example`. The trusted-looking words placed before it do not change who controls the destination.

    Look for substituted characters such as `0` instead of `o`, `1` instead of `l`, or `rn` instead of `m`. Also check added words, doubled letters, hyphens, unexpected country codes, and endings such as `.bet`, `.vip`, or `.app` when the verified brand uses another address.

    Advertisement

    Expected result: You identify the core domain rather than relying on the brand name displayed on the page.

  2. Find the genuine casino domain independently

    Do not ask the suspected site to prove itself using links that it controls. Open the relevant gambling regulator’s website independently and search its register for the operator, brand, licence number, or domain.

    You may also use a verified corporate page, established regulator record, or official regional directory to locate the genuine address. Compare the complete hostname, including any meaningful regional subdomain.

    A search engine result can help you locate an official source, but ranking first does not prove authenticity. Advertisements and misleading pages can appear above the genuine website.

    Expected result: You obtain an authoritative reference address that did not originate from the suspected website.

    Advertisement
  3. Match the operator and licence record

    Compare the legal company, trading name, licence number, domain, authorization status, and permitted gambling activity. A clone may copy a genuine licence number from another business, so matching the number alone is insufficient.

    The brand and legal operator can legitimately differ. This commonly occurs when one company operates several trading names or supplies a white-label casino platform. The regulator’s record must still connect the licence holder to the exact domain or explain the operating relationship.

    If the licence exists but the domain is absent, inactive, or assigned to another company, do not deposit. Ask the regulator for clarification through contact details on its official website.

    Expected result: The regulator independently connects the exact website to the licensed operator.

  4. Inspect redirects and destination changes

    Watch the address bar when moving from the homepage to login, registration, verification, support, and payment pages. A clone may begin on a convincing domain before redirecting sensitive actions elsewhere.

    A separate domain is not automatically fraudulent. Licensed casinos often use disclosed identity, customer-support, and payment processors. The operator should identify the provider, and the transition should not disguise the new destination.

    Advertisement

    Stop if the login page unexpectedly opens on an unrelated domain, the document uploader uses an unexplained file-sharing service, or support directs you to a different website through chat.

    Expected result: Every sensitive destination is either controlled by the verified operator or attributable to a disclosed provider.

  5. Check domain registration data

    Use the ICANN Lookup service for supported domains. Registration data may show the creation date, most recent update, expiry date, registrar, and nameservers. Personal registrant details are often redacted for privacy, so hidden ownership is not proof of fraud.

    Since January 28, 2025, RDAP has replaced traditional WHOIS as the definitive delivery method for generic top-level domain registration data, according to the ICANN RDAP notice.

    A domain created last week is suspicious when the website claims to have operated at that address for 15 years. However, domain age is supporting evidence only. A legitimate operator can launch a new regional site, while criminals can buy an old domain or compromise an established one.

    Advertisement

    Expected result: The registration timeline is either consistent with the website’s history or adds weight to other warning signs.

  6. Check browser and Safe Browsing warnings

    Do not continue past a browser warning about phishing, malware, an invalid certificate, or deceptive content. Record the warning and close the page.

    Google says its Safe Browsing system examines URLs for known phishing and malware threats and displays warnings in supported browsers and search products. You can use its site-status tools as an additional check.

    A clean result does not prove that a casino is licensed or harmless. New clone sites may not have been detected, and a legitimate site can later become compromised.

    HTTPS also has a narrow meaning. It encrypts the connection between your browser and the website. Criminals can obtain valid certificates for domains they control, so a padlock does not confirm the operator’s identity or gambling authorization.

    Advertisement

    Expected result: You identify known technical threats without treating the absence of a warning as approval.

  7. Verify the application and installation route

    Reach the official mobile application through the verified operator’s website or a listing linked from an authoritative source. Compare the developer name, publisher, privacy-policy domain, support contact, download history, and recent updates.

    Be cautious when an advertisement opens a page that visually copies Apple’s App Store or Google Play but remains inside a normal browser. A button labelled Install may add a progressive web app, configuration profile, or downloaded package instead of an app reviewed by the platform.

    Do not sideload an APK, desktop installer, or mobile profile solely because a support agent says the regular store version is unavailable in your country. Geographic unavailability may indicate that the operator is not authorized to serve your location.

    Expected result: The application publisher and distribution route connect to the verified operator.

    Advertisement
  8. Verify support contacts and payment recipients

    Compare the support email’s domain with the verified operator’s address. A free email account or unrelated domain deserves scrutiny, especially when it requests identity documents, remote-device access, cryptocurrency, or payment outside the cashier.

    Before authorizing a payment, inspect the card merchant, bank beneficiary, e-wallet merchant, or crypto instructions. A legitimate processor may have a different name from the casino, but that relationship should be disclosed or explainable.

    Do not transfer funds to a support agent’s personal account. Treat constantly changing bank beneficiaries or wallet addresses as high-risk until independently verified.

    Expected result: The recipient is the licensed operator or an identifiable payment provider rather than an unrelated person or company.

  9. Compare the copied content for contradictions

    Clones often reproduce the visible design while overlooking details deeper in the site. Check whether the terms name another brand, the privacy policy identifies a different company, or the responsible-gambling links lead to the wrong country.

    Other inconsistencies include mixed currencies, contradictory minimum ages, placeholder addresses, broken complaint links, unexplained language changes, or support pages copied from another operator.

    Advertisement

    Recognizable games do not establish legitimacy. The UK Gambling Commission has documented licensed games appearing on unlicensed gambling websites. A familiar game studio or live-dealer interface is not a substitute for checking the casino itself.

    Expected result: The legal and operational content is consistent with the verified operator and jurisdiction.

  10. Assign a pass, caution, or fail result

    Give the site a pass only when the regulator, operator, exact domain, app publisher, and payment route align. Use caution when a legitimate operator appears to have introduced a new regional domain, migration, white-label relationship, or processor that is not yet clearly documented.

    Fail the site when the licence belongs to an unrelated company, the domain impersonates another brand, the regulator page is fake, or the payment recipient cannot be connected to the operator.

    Expected result: You reach a decision before exposing credentials, documents, or money.

    Advertisement

Six-step workflow shows Read Domain, Open Regulator, Match Licence, Inspect Redirect, Check Payment, and Record Result.

Verification Matrix: Genuine, Unclear, or Cloned

Check Genuine indication Caution Clone or impersonation indication
Exact domain Listed by the regulator or verified operator New regional or migrated domain Lookalike or unrelated domain
Licence number Matches the operator and domain Business relationship is unclear Belongs to an unrelated company
Regulator link Uses the authority’s official domain Official link is temporarily unavailable Opens an imitation verification page
Registration history Consistent with the website’s stated history Recent launch or ownership change New domain claiming a long history
HTTPS Valid encrypted connection Recently changed certificate Certificate or browser warning
Application Publisher matches the verified operator Related company is not explained Unrelated publisher or fake store page
Payment recipient Operator or disclosed processor Unfamiliar but traceable descriptor Personal or unrelated beneficiary
Games and design Consistent brand and legal information Minor regional variations Copied assets with contradictory legal details

Regulatory, domain, publisher, and payment-recipient mismatches carry more weight than design quality. A polished clone can look more convincing than an older legitimate website.

What to Do If You Already Used the Suspected Clone

Danger

  1. Stop interacting with it.
    Close the page or application. Do not confront support or follow new recovery instructions.
  2. Preserve evidence.
    Save the exact URL, screenshots, emails, chat logs, phone numbers, payment details, transaction references, and crypto hashes.
  3. Change exposed passwords.
    Use a trusted device and start with your email account. Change every account where the same or a similar password was used.
  4. Enable multifactor authentication.
    Terminate unfamiliar sessions and remove unknown recovery addresses or devices.
  5. Contact the payment provider.
    Tell your bank, card issuer, wallet, or exchange what information was exposed and identify unauthorized transactions accurately.
  6. Protect affected cards and accounts.
    Freeze or replace them when advised. Monitor statements and alerts for new activity.
  7. Secure the device.
    Remove suspicious applications or profiles, review permissions, install operating-system updates, and run a trusted security scan.
  8. Protect your identity.
    Treat uploaded passports, licences, statements, and selfies as compromised. Follow the relevant identity-theft process in your country.
  9. Report the clone.
    Notify the impersonated operator, gambling regulator, browser-security provider, hosting or advertising platform, and applicable national fraud-reporting service.
  10. Avoid recovery scams.
    Do not pay an agent who guarantees that lost deposits or cryptocurrency can be recovered.

The urgency depends on what happened. Merely viewing a page creates a different risk from entering a password, uploading identity documents, authorizing a card payment, sending crypto, or installing software.

The US Federal Trade Commission’s phishing response guidance recommends protecting affected accounts and devices when scammers obtain personal or financial information. Readers who submitted documents should follow the extended checklist for ID uploaded to a scam site.

If money was sent and the casino now refuses or delays payment, preserve the clone evidence before following the casino withdrawal troubleshooting process.

Advertisement

Compromised Account alert links to Change Password, Contact Bank, Secure Device, Save Evidence, and Report Domain.

Common Mistakes That Make Verification Less Reliable

Mistake Why it fails Better check
Trusting the first search result Advertisements and manipulated results can lead to impersonators Start with an official regulator record
Clicking the casino’s licence seal The suspected site controls the destination Open the regulator independently
Trusting HTTPS Encryption does not prove identity or authorization Match the domain and operator
Checking reviews only Reviews may concern a different domain or be manipulated Verify the exact URL through primary sources
Relying on domain age Old domains can be sold or compromised Combine RDAP with regulatory evidence
Recognizing the games Licensed games can appear on unauthorized sites Verify the casino’s own licence
Testing with a small deposit Successful payment confirms only that the site can receive money Do not fund an unresolved website
Questioning suspicious support You may reveal more information to the impersonator Contact the verified operator separately

Operational Limits and Edge Cases

Not every unfamiliar address is a clone. Legitimate operators may use country-specific domains, white-label brands, dedicated identity providers, payment processors, or new addresses introduced during a migration.

A genuine exception should be independently documented. The regulator’s register, verified operator website, official app listing, or published provider relationship should explain why the domains or company names differ.

RDAP records can hide personal ownership details for legitimate privacy reasons. Safe Browsing may not yet recognize a newly launched phishing site. Conversely, an established legitimate website can be compromised and temporarily serve malicious content.

Progressive web apps also blur the difference between a normal website and an installed application. Their use is not automatically malicious, but the installation source and operator still require verification.

Advertisement

Do not assume a site is genuine because it is absent from a regulator’s unauthorized-domain list. Blacklists document known cases and can lag behind new domains. Positive verification through official records is stronger than the absence of a warning.

Key Takeaways

  • Read the registrable domain instead of trusting the logo or page title.
  • Navigate from the official regulator toward the casino.
  • Match the legal operator, licence number, exact domain, status, and activity.
  • Inspect redirects before entering passwords, documents, or payment information.
  • Use RDAP and Safe Browsing as supporting checks, not proof of legitimacy.
  • Do not treat HTTPS, polished design, or recognizable games as licensing evidence.
  • Verify application publishers, support contacts, and payment beneficiaries.
  • Stop when a regulatory, domain, publisher, or transaction-recipient mismatch appears.
  • Secure exposed accounts and devices immediately.
  • Preserve evidence before reporting or attempting recovery.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can two legitimate casino websites have almost the same name?

Yes. Separate companies, regional brands, and white-label casinos can use similar names. Similarity does not establish a connection. Verify each exact domain and its legal operator through the regulator responsible for your location.

Can a cloned casino rank above the real website in search results?

Yes. A clone can appear through paid advertising or temporarily rank for brand-related searches. Search position is not authentication. Use the regulator’s register or another independently verified brand source to locate the official domain.

Does a valid SSL certificate mean a casino website is genuine?

No. A valid certificate encrypts traffic between your browser and that domain. It does not prove that the domain belongs to the casino it claims to represent or that it holds a gambling licence.

Can scammers copy a real casino’s live chat?

Yes. They can copy the appearance of a chat widget or use a similar third-party service. Verify the website surrounding the chat and contact the genuine operator through details obtained independently.

Advertisement
Is a newly registered casino domain always fraudulent?

No. Operators can launch new brands, regional sites, and replacement domains. A recent registration becomes more concerning when the site claims a long history or lacks an official connection to the licensed operator.

What if the casino is not on an unauthorized-site list?

Its absence proves only that the specific domain may not have been listed. New threats can appear before regulators or security services detect them. Confirm the domain positively through the operator’s official regulatory record.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Bose’s QuietComfort Headphones Put Ultra Features on a $199 Pair

Published

on

Bose QuietComfort Headphones
Bose refreshed its everyday over-ears and left the price at $199 (was $359). QuietComfort Headphones now carry Immersive Audio, two-way USB-C sound, and smarter canceling that used to live on the more expensive Ultra models.



The former spherical silhouette has been replaced with pill-shaped earcups and a broader sliding headband. Protein-leather pads are removable, and the entire rig weighs roughly 230 grams. That number is important for a red-eye flight. The cushioning around the ears and across the crown is thick enough that most people cease noticing the headset within twenty minutes. Glasses wearers have a cleaner seal than they did with the original QuietComfort Headphones.

Sale


Bose QuietComfort Headphones – Wireless Bluetooth Headphones, Active Over Ear Noise Cancelling and Mic…
  • NOISE CANCELLING HEADPHONES: Effortlessly combines noise cancellation technology with passive features so you can shut off the outside world, quiet…
  • COMFORTABLE HEADPHONES: Plush over-ear cushions softly hug your ears, while a secure and comfortable padded band gently keeps your studio headphones…
  • 2 LISTENING MODES: These wireless Bluetooth headphones feature Quiet and Aware Modes that let you toggle between full noise cancelling or full…


QuietControl is the new term for the canceling system, and ActiveSense is the component that responds to noise surges. A bus hiss, a blender, and a cabin roar: the headphones add extra silence without requiring a menu dive. When canceling was turned on, SoundGuys found that perceived loudness decreased by 85 percent. Aware mode still let street noise and conversation through. If you merely want raw isolation from the pads, you can use the full off setting.

Advertisement


The stock tune features warm bass and rich mids. Treble remains courteous rather than harsh. The Bose app includes a three-band equalization that allows you to increase or decrease bass, mids, and highs without having to navigate ten sliders. TrueSpatial audio, previously reserved for Ultra, is now available in three versions. Still mode keeps the mix in the room as you turn your head. In motion mode, the stage moves with you. Cinema mode broadens the scope of films while attempting to keep voices central.

Bose QuietComfort Headphones
USB-C now supports bidirectional audio transmission at up to 24-bit/48 kHz. You may listen as the battery charges. A USB-C to 3.5 mm cable is included in the container for airplane seats and older plugs. Bluetooth 5.4 supports two devices at once. Codecs remain at AAC and SBC. AptX remains an Ultra perk. With canceling turned on, the battery life lasts 24 hours, however it drops to 18 hours if Immersive Audio is left on. Fifteen minutes on a charging provides approximately 2.5 hours. You may wear them as they charge, eliminating the usual “dead battery” dread on a long day.

Bose QuietComfort Headphones
Six microphones are used to conduct calls. Bose claims that voice pickup is cleaner than the previous generation. Independent testers continue to rate talking as the poorest capability of these devices. There is no wear sensor, thus music will not stop when you lift a cup. There are no water ratings either. On paper, their competitors will outlast them by 50 hours.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

BLUETTI has unveiled the Pioneer 5000 E-Generator at IFA 2026

Published

on

BLUETTI has unveiled the Pioneer 5000 E-Generator, built for construction, rental and remote-site power with 5kW continuous and 18kW surge output.

Construction sites across the EU answer to Stage V emissions standards phased in from 2019, while sites in London have faced the Non-Road Mobile Machinery Low Emission Zone since 2015, and BLUETTI enters that landscape with an E-Generator category built around the Pioneer 5000.

That combination suits noise‑sensitive sites and intermittent tool use, the system’s 5.12kWh battery (expandable to 35kWh) powers short‑burst tools and lighting, with load‑dependent runtime, and features IP65, IK10, and a -20°C to 55°C environmental tolerance.

Charging follows the same practical logic, since 5 to 80 percent takes around 60 minutes at up to 5kW of AC input and combined AC-solar charging can reach 6.2kW, while BLUETTI rates noise at no more than 50 decibels, a level that could appeal to operators working in noise-sensitive locations.

Advertisement

Remote oversight comes through the BLUETTI App and an optional 4G module, which combine location tracking, fault alerts, remote diagnostics and over-the-air updates to cut routine site visits for fleet managers.

The Pioneer 5000 forms one part of a wider portfolio BLUETTI is showing at IFA 2026 under the theme From Balcony to Everywhere, and the range spans professional power, home energy storage and portable devices for life on the move.

Advertisement

BLUETTI Pioneer 5000 E-Generator outsideBLUETTI Pioneer 5000 E-Generator outside

Home energy and portable additions

Household electricity costs echo that same pressure, since Eurostat’s second-half 2025 figures show EU household prices plateaued near their post-crisis highs at around 0.29 euros per kWh, above pre-2021 levels, and the Balco 500 responds with a 5,024Wh LFP battery paired with up to 4,600W of solar input.

Balco 500 combines grid-tied and off-grid backup modes with an IP65 rating, a 10-year product warranty and a separately stated 8,000-cycle rating for the pack itself, per BLUETTI’s published specifications.

Advertisement

As the AI‑driven brain of Balco 500, BlueBot learns household usage patterns to build a dynamic energy model, and incorporates the Plug & Play Phase‑Match Energy System to auto‑coordinate three‑phase wiring for optimal solar self‑consumption.

BLUETTI Balco 500BLUETTI Balco 500

What is more interesting is Bluetti’s EnergyFlex System, it connects a compatible portable power station to home circuits through a Balco Transfer Hub, turning that power station into part of a home energy system.

Advertisement

Alongside that home energy solution, BLUETTI previewed the Elite mini Series, three compact power stations spanning from 288Wh to 2,010Wh that measure up to 42 percent smaller and 25 percent lighter than the equivalent Elite V2 models for camping or home use.

BLUETTI has not confirmed pricing or regional availability for the Pioneer 5000 or the wider lineup, and that figure will likely decide how compelling the E-Generator category looks to rental operators weighing it against diesel alternatives on purchase price and operating costs.

Advertisement

BLUETTI expects the Balco 500 to reach the market shortly after IFA concludes, and the wider range remains on display at Booth H2.2-176 during the event, which runs from 4 to 8 September at Messe Berlin.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Pros And Cons Of Using A Chromebook As Your Everyday PC

Published

on

Chromebooks offer some great advantages, but there are limitations to know before you start using one every day.

Chromebooks have come a long way since their initial release in 2011, and the future promises more interesting devices with the upcoming Googlebooks, which aim to harmonize Android and ChromeOS into a single package. If you’re considering switching from Windows or Mac into something more minimalist, a Chromebook can certainly be a good alternative. These machines have their quirks, though, and have proved divisive in tech communities over the years.

If you’re someone who wants a machine that’s lightweight, efficient and secure, and you largely work within office applications like emails and spreadsheets, it’s definitely worth looking into a Chromebook. However, there are a few drawbacks to be aware of before you take the plunge.

Advertisement

Pros of using a Chromebook

One of the best qualities of a Chromebook is its simplicity, both physically and digitally. They’re generally much lighter than a typical laptop, while simultaneously being more durable. They also boast enviable battery life, with many models lasting upwards of 10 hours on a single charge. 

This battery life is largely due to the simplicity of ChromeOS. Modeled after the Chrome browser, it’s an interface most people are familiar with already, with much less learning needed to use it efficiently. This streamlined approach also means Chromebooks boot within a few seconds.

The OS is much more secure than a typical PC’s by default, thanks to a few different approaches. For one, it’s a read-only OS; because you can only make changes to your own files and cloud storage, it’s much harder for malicious programs to wreck system files. A verified boot system double-checks for suspicious changes each time the Chromebook starts, automatically reverting to a previous version if it detects something’s off. And a process called sandboxing — where every webpage and application runs in its own environment — ensures any issues that do arise don’t contaminate other areas. 

Advertisement

Chromebooks aren’t completely immune to security threats, as they can still fall prey to attacks like malicious extensions or Play Store apps. And no matter what device you’re using, you can still fall for a phishing email or have your weak password guessed. But in general, Chromebooks offer fewer points of attack than a Windows machine. 

If you want more control and don’t mind losing most of these security features, you can enable Developer Mode on your Chromebook to get full access to the system. This allows you to install Linux and access a full terminal.

Perhaps the biggest selling point for a Chromebook is its pricing. There are higher-end models that get closer to the prices of standard laptops, retailing upwards of $700, but the average Chromebook is much cheaper. Engadget’s Chromebook pick for 2026, the Acer Chromebook Plus 514, is only $400 (depending on where you find it). Many other Chromebooks fall into a similar price range.

Advertisement

Cons of using a Chromebook

Back when the Chromebook line was introduced, they were essentially useless when you didn’t have internet access. Fortunately, there have been several improvements in this area over the years — much of Google Workspace (like Docs and Sheets) will work offline, as will Gmail. Other apps like Netflix and YouTube offer video downloading for offline use. While the offline situation is better now, a Chromebook is still a cloud-dependent device, so you’ll find your options limited without internet. Gaming is streaming-focused on ChromeOS, so unless you’re looking to play downloaded Android games, you’re out of luck.

This streaming-heavy gaming landscape, which largely relies on services like Nvidia GeForce Now and Xbox Cloud Gaming to play non-Google Play Store games, is a symptom of a larger Chromebook problem: software incompatibility. Not only do programs like Steam not run on ChromeOS, but a myriad of professional tools like Adobe Creative Cloud and legacy enterprise software used in fields like healthcare won’t work either. If you need any of these programs for work, ChromeOS is a non-starter. Speaking of compatibility, ever since Google Cloud Print was discontinued in 2020, not all printers work with ChromeOS. While most modern Wi-Fi printers should work, checking Google’s page on Chromebook printers is a wise idea.

Even the best equivalents to missing software can struggle with heavier rendering and processing due to the typical Chromebook’s weaker hardware. Because the OS is much simpler and so cloud-reliant, Chromebooks usually offer far lower specs in key areas like RAM, CPU and storage. There are always exceptions, but higher-spec Chromebooks come with much heftier price tags. If you’re worried about the best specs for the money, you should probably buy one of the best standard laptops instead.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How To Reset The Camera Settings On Your iPhone

Published

on

Changing your iPhone camera settings back to default is pretty simple, so long as you don’t mind flipping a few dozen toggles.

While it’s unlikely your iPhone will ever beat out a purpose-built camera, there’s a lot you can do to optimize its capture quality. Even an out-of-date iPhone will be chock-a-block with ways to take your photography and videography to the next level. However, sometimes the best way to measure that improvement is by going back to the basics of default settings.

There are many ways to improve your smartphone photography with any model, and iPhones are no different; there are thousands of great guides to help you choose the right settings for the pictures and videos you want. On the other hand, it can be hard to judge the change in quality if you’ve already spent a long time messing with your settings — or if you have a second-hand phone that arrived pre-muddled. Sometimes, it’s desirable to bring your camera back to default settings and build from there, but there’s no single button to carry out that reset. Luckily, it’s still relatively simple to set everything back to default.

Advertisement

The default iPhone camera settings

First things first, you’ll want to go from Settings to Camera, where you’ll find everything available to you laid out. Given how much the iPhone has changed in the last few years, this layout won’t be the same for every phone. Luckily, one thing that generally will be the same is the Preserve Settings option. Under this option are a number of toggles which, when turned off, automatically reset their given setting to default when you open the camera app. All of these toggles are initially turned off, save for the Live Photo toggle, meaning your camera already mostly returns to its original settings after you exit the application.

There are also further settings within this section that can be set back to a default state. Your frame rate for recording video should be 1080p at 30 fps (or 240 fps for Slo-mo), and should be the same for Cinematic recording if your phone supports the option. Further defaults include Stereo in Record Sound (or Spatial Audio on the iPhone 16 and above) and High Efficiency in the Formats section. Grid and Level shooting will also be turned off, while Smart HDR and Prioritise Faster Shooting should be turned on.

Advertisement

Default camera settings for iOS 26

iPhones that can install iOS 26 have a few extra settings with their own defaults. For instance, Lens Correction, Macro Control, and Scene Detection should all start toggled on. Furthermore, the default resolution under Formats should be 24 MP. ProRAW & Resolution Control will also be off.

This is a lot to keep tabs on, of course, so there is a Hail Mary for those who don’t want to sift through a dozen toggles. If you navigate via Settings > Transfer or Reset iPhone, you can find the Reset options. There’s no option to just reset your camera settings, but you can reset all of your iPhone settings. This will remove any Apple Pay cards, keys and passes that you have, and bring all settings to their defaults, so only use this option if you’re absolutely sure and can switch back anything you don’t want as default.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

DRAM contract prices forecast to grow only 13-18% in Q3

Published

on

storage

PC buyers already had enough of helping to fund the AI revolution, only essential refreshes happening now

The relentless rise in memory prices may finally be losing steam, as PC and smartphone buyers reach the limits of what their budgets will allow them to pay. 

Advertisement

Taiwanese market watcher Trend Force estimates that rising DRAM contract prices drove a 59.5 percent quarter-on-quarter jump in industry revenue to $154.73 billion in calendar Q2.

The analyst now expects conventional DRAM contract price growth to “moderate” to 13 to 18 percent quarter-on-quarter in Q3. That reflects a shift in demand away from high-capacity RDIMMs toward lower-capacity products, as well as “the limited ability of PC and smartphone customers to absorb further price increases.”

That 13 to 18 percent is still a punishing increase by any normal standard. Supplier inventories remain at historic lows, TrendForce warns, and total bit shipments are expected to grow modestly. In other words, prices are climbing more slowly and supplies are likely to remain tight for the forseeable future.

The forecast follows a warning from market intelligence biz Context that European PC shipments are set to decline even more sharply as rising component costs push up system prices. 

Advertisement

Context forecasts a year-on-year decline in laptop shipments of 6.4 percent in Q3, followed by a 20 percent fall in Q4. The outlook is even worse for desktops, with shipments expected to decline around 20 percent in Q3 and almost 30 percent in Q4.

Despite declining shipments, PC makers have continued to bring home the bacon, as higher prices have so far more than compensated for the fall in volumes. Earlier this year, The Register reported how Lenovo boasted it had sidestepped the fallout from the memory crisis by shifting its focus to premium devices.

Context says corporate buyers are extending refresh cycles where possible and acquiring new PCs only when upgrades are unavoidable.

“The PC refresh cycle has not disappeared, but the economics around it have changed,” said Context senior analyst Marie-Christine Pygott.

Advertisement

“For the channel, the opportunity is increasingly about helping customers prioritize where refreshes are essential, where devices can remain in service for longer and where investment in newer, more capable systems makes commercial sense.”

As for the AI PCs that manufacturers hoped would trigger a mass upgrade wave, Context says the end of Windows 10 support was the principal driver of recent buying activity, as The Register noted at the start of this year. While AI-capable PCs account for an increasing share of systems entering the European supply chain, this is mostly because AI functionality is becoming standard in newer devices.

TrendForce notes that the three major memory makers continue to focus on high-end products for the AI market. Samsung benefited from its early move into HBM4 mass production, while SK hynix had the highest proportion of HBM in its total bit shipments among the three leading suppliers. Micron is prioritizing higher-priced server DRAM.

That has left second-tier manufacturers such as Nanya, Winbond, and PSMC to meet demand for mature-process products such as DDR4 and DDR3. ®

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

GPUThor breaks the error correction Nvidia recommended against Rowhammer

Published

on

Last year Nvidia told GPU owners worried about Rowhammer to switch on error correction. Four researchers at the University of Toronto have now shown that the same attack, aimed harder, goes straight through it.

Their technique, GPUThor, is the first Rowhammer attack to defeat ECC on Nvidia GPUs. It works on four Ampere-generation workstation cards: the RTX A4000, A4500, A5000 and A6000. On each, it turns an ordinary unprivileged CUDA program into a root shell on the host computer, with error correction enabled. Chris S. Lin, Joyce Qu, Aditya Rajeev and Gururaj Saileshwar published the paper on 25 August. They will present it at ACM CCS in The Hague in November. Nvidia issued a security notice on 21 August. Bill Toulas at BleepingComputer reported the disclosure the following day; TechRadar picked it up on Monday.

The attack code stays private until 15 November. There is no patch, and the researchers say there cannot be one without new hardware.

What Rowhammer does, and why ECC was the answer

DRAM stores each bit as a charge in a cell, and the cells sit in rows packed tightly together. Hammer one row with repeated reads and charge leaks into its neighbours, flipping their bits. The attacker never touches the victim’s data directly. That is why Rowhammer has been a favourite route to sandbox escapes and privilege escalation on CPUs for a decade.

Advertisement

The same team brought it to GPUs. GPUHammer in 2025 produced the first bit flips in GDDR6 memory. GPUBreach earlier this year turned those flips into a root shell. Both attacks died the moment a user enabled ECC. They produced tens to hundreds of flips per gigabyte, and the GPU’s error correction could fix a single flipped bit and detect a second.

So Nvidia’s advice was correct for the attacks that existed. GPUThor is a different attack.

Hammering harder, not smarter

Earlier GPU attacks hammered uniformly, spreading effort across decoy rows to evade the chip’s built-in defence, Target Row Refresh. CPU attacks moved to non-uniform patterns years ago. Nobody had managed it on a GPU, for two reasons the paper reverse-engineers.

The first is that the GPU memory system merges repeated requests to the same address, so naive hammering collapses into a single activation. The team found that accesses from different warps to different cache lines of the same row survive as separate hits. The second is timing: Target Row Refresh on Ampere GDDR6 fires roughly once every 72 refresh intervals, not once per interval as assumed. Patterns that stay synchronised with that schedule reproduce reliably.

Advertisement

The result is 6.6 times the hammering intensity of prior GPU attacks, and 500 to 23,500 times more bit flips. With ECC off, the A5000 gave up 377,000 flips per gigabyte. Blacksmith, the strongest CPU attack, achieves about 550,000 on DDR4. An end-to-end privilege escalation that took 21.9 hours with GPUHammer patterns takes 1.1 minutes with GPUThor.

With ECC on, the flips arrive faster than the correction can handle. The researchers recorded 387 double-bit errors that ECC detects but cannot fix. They also saw two triple-bit errors that it silently repaired into the wrong value.

Three things an attacker can now do

The first is denial of service. On an A6000 with ECC enabled, GPUThor forces a GPU reset every two hours, killing every job on the card. Within a day the GPU declares itself defective and asks to be replaced.

The second is takeover. By corrupting GPU page tables, an unprivileged program gains read and write access to any memory and opens a root shell on the host CPU. The researchers describe it as the first such takeover on an ECC-protected GPU.

Advertisement

The third is silent corruption. A triple-bit error that ECC miscorrects leaves no trace. On a card training or serving a model, that is a wrong weight nobody will find.

Who should worry

The four confirmed cards are workstation parts, common in AI workstations and in cloud instances. Nvidia says no bit flips appeared on GDDR6X or HBM2e cards under the same patterns, and the researchers found none on HBM or GDDR7 either. But BleepingComputer reports the paper says privilege escalation can still work on A100 server GPUs, which use the same class of error correction. Blackwell’s repair feature slows the attack rather than stopping it, the paper says.

The setting that matters is a shared GPU. When one physical card is time-shared between users, which is common in cloud AI services, an attacker on the same card can flip bits in a victim’s data or crash the shared GPU. TNW reported in July that a cloud tenant with nothing but a rented GPU could rattle the power grid. GPUThor is the same threat model aimed at the tenant next door.

The advice, and the economics

Even an unshared GPU is exposed if it runs untrusted code, and in AI that is most of them. A model downloaded from the internet, a package pulled in by a training script, or an agent given a sandbox all run on the card. China’s Kimi K3 broke out of its sandbox at the UK’s AI Security Institute in August, and OpenAI’s agents escaped a capture-the-flag lab in July. Neither needed a hardware flaw. GPUThor hands the next one a much shorter path.

Advertisement

Nvidia’s own advice is to enable system ECC and IOMMU isolation together, monitor error telemetry, and restrict untrusted workloads. The researchers add: do not share a physical GPU across untrusted tenants, and treat a spike in corrected-error counts as an attack in progress.

That advice runs against the economics. The neocloud business sells shared GPU time by the hour, and short-term capacity already costs double long-term. Isolating every tenant on their own card makes it dearer still. Nvidia, which built an AI safety team this summer with a business case behind it, now has a hardware security problem with the opposite business case.

What to watch

Three things. The first is 15 November, when the code goes public on GitHub. The gap between a paper and a working exploit in the wild is usually measured from that date, not the paper’s.

The second is the A100 question. The confirmed cards are workstation parts. If the escalation path works on the server GPU that trained most of the current generation of models, the affected fleet is a different order of magnitude, and Nvidia has not said so either way.

Advertisement

The third is the fix that is not coming. The researchers say a complete answer needs multi-bit ECC or the DDR5-class defences, Refresh Management and Per-Row Activation Counting, built into GPU memory. Those are future products. Everything currently deployed will run with the mitigation Nvidia gave last year, which is the one this paper breaks.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Anthropic delays IPO plans to October

Published

on

The latest plans could see Anthropic completing its listing days before the US mid-term elections in November.

Anthropic is expected to delay its initial public offering to mid-October at the earliest, Reuters news reported late last week.

The delay pushes plans back by a month, according to sources, who told Reuters that the AI giant initially aimed to make its IPO prospectus public as early as this week.

The latest plans would see Anthropic completing its listing days before the US mid-term elections in November. The IPO process was initially expected to kickstart before the end of August.

Advertisement

Anthropic is expected to make a historical IPO debut, with investors hoping the company rakes in $75bn or more, surpassing SpaceX as the largest listing.

Last month, the Financial Times reported investors’ expectations that Anthropic would be valued at $2trn or more – doubling its initial target of $1trn and dwarfing Elon Musk’s AI space-tech company. Anthropic was last valued at $965bn after a $65bn Series H funding round in May.

Expectations for lofty valuations are backed up by Anthropic’s rapidly growing revenue, which reportedly hit roughly $11bn in the second quarter of this year – more than doubling the $4.8bn it recorded in the first quarter.

The company posted a net loss of $42bn for the entirety of 2025. Despite this, backers expect rapidly growing sales to reach an annualised revenue of between $100bn and $120bn this year.

Advertisement

As part of the IPO process, Anthropic is looking to ​finalise a $15bn revolving credit facility, Reuters reported. Sources further told the publication that Morgan Stanley, ⁠Goldman Sachs, ​JPMorgan and Citi are among the banks working with the AI giant on the IPO.

Last month, a US judge blocked the Pentagon’s blacklisting of Anthropic’s products for government use, handing the AI company a major win ahead of its plans to go public. The company sued the US government in March after its refusal to lower guardrails on its AI models led to an abrupt ‘supply chain risk’ designation.

In the 27 August ruling, the judge said that the Pentagon’s actions threatened to harm Anthropic and quell public debate around its actions.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

‘Cupertino’ legal drama doesn’t represent region demographics

Published

on

The trailer for an upcoming B-tier legal drama for CBS called “Cupertino” suggests it knows where the show takes place, but doesn’t offer much else that represents the region where Apple calls home.

No, Cupertino isn’t coming to Apple TV, but it does appear to be a drama hoping to showcase legal battles between tech giants and their employees. However, reports suggest that the trailer leaves a lot to be desired in representing the city.

According to a report from Mercury News, the show’s first trailer left real Cupertino residents scratching their head. Not only does the trailer lack real Cupertino locations, but it lacks representation of the local majority Asian population.

It is normal for a show to take some creative license with filming, production, sets, and casting, but residents of Cupertino are feeling a little put out. You won’t spot Apple Park in the sweeping cityscapes, nor will you see a single boba shop despite them outnumbering coffee shops in the area.

Advertisement

The region has a 70% Asian population and the people of Cupertino are well aware of this thanks to knock-on effects of such a specific population majority. To see a trailer focus so much on characters and locals not associated with their beloved town, it begs the question of why it’s called “Cupertino” in the first place.

Apple is name-dropped in the trailer, and you’ll spot MacBooks throughout. However, given Apple’s brand appearance, it seems highly unlikely that the show will tackle Apple as one of the “Goliaths” it wants to take on legally.

To make matters a little more awkward, the show is filmed in New York and New Jersey. It seems odd that the show wouldn’t at least bother with some B-roll of the area for the trailer.

We’ll have to see what the show actually looks like when it premieres on October 8, but it feels like another crime procedural dud waiting to be canceled.

Advertisement

Cupertino seemingly chose the name to evoke Silicon Valley as its focus, though that name was taken by an HBO property. However, in naming itself after a very recognizable region of California, it asks to be scrutinized, and locals don’t recognize themselves in the trailer whatsoever.

While I’d like to believe the show found time to pay better homage to Cupertino itself, I highly doubt it. More than likely we can treat this version of Cupertino the same way we might Gotham City or San Fransokyo — pure fiction.

Some social media users have argued that the show being fictional should mean it can change how the region is portrayed. However, deliberately or not, not acknowledging a key demographic of a region your show is named for is, at the minimum, problematic.

For the real residents of Cupertino, they can sit this crime drama out, as it likely holds little resemblance to the real place. It seems highly unlikely that the show will properly acknowledge the majority Asian population or Apple’s combative nature with labor unions.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025