Trying to decide between the MacBook Pro and the Mac Studio? While both Apple devices have seen significant updates since the release of the M4 and M2-powered models, these older machines are still exceptionally powerful. And you can even save some money choosing them over the latest devices.

This article comprehensively compares the MacBook Pro M4 and Mac Studio M2, examining their strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases to help you determine which machine is best suited for your specific needs.

Surfshark has released a native app for Vega OS, bringing its virtual private network service to the latest generation of Amazon Fire TV devices powered by the company’s new Linux-based platform. The update restores functionality lost when Amazon moved away from its Android-based Fire OS in late 2025.

When Vega OS replaced Fire OS as Amazon’s underlying software for Fire TV streaming hardware in October, it broke support for Android apps, meaning existing apps didn’t carry over. This created a gap for those who relied on VPNs for streaming and required developers to rebuild apps for the new environment. Surfshark’s new app closes that gap, offering what the company describes as “core VPN capabilities” on Vega OS devices.

The practical benefits remain the same: A VPN encrypts internet and streaming activity, masks IP addresses and can help avoid ISP throttling during high-bandwidth use. The tech is also commonly used to access region-specific libraries on services like Netflix and HBO Max — a use case that had effectively been sidelined on newer Fire TV devices until this new wave of native apps began arriving. Surfshark notes its Vega OS app currently focuses on core features and supports the WireGuard protocol. Broader support is expected to come later, as the app and platform mature.

For now, this is less about new features and more about restoring parity for people upgrading to newer Fire TV hardware. Surfshark joins other providers, including NordVPN and IPVanish, in building dedicated apps for Amazon’s Vega OS ecosystem. As more developers follow suit, Vega OS moves closer to matching the app ecosystem it replaces. 

For more context, check out CNET’s coverage of Surfshark VPN, our roundup of the best VPN services and our guide to the best VPNs for Fire TV Stick.

The next version of WatchOS is set to get a stripped-down version of the Watch Ultra’s signature watch face, alongside multiple others, according to a report by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. Whether this means the latest version of the OS will primarily be an aesthetics upgrade, or Apple has just stayed tight-lipped about WatchOS 27, remains to be seen. 

With WWDC 2026 just around the corner, most eyes are on iOS 27, which is set to include the Google Gemini-powered Siri to strengthen Apple’s AI efforts, but rumors on the latest from WatchOS have been minimal.

According to Gurman’s newsletter Power On, Apple has several new watch faces in the works for the next version of WatchOS, but the most familiar of them is also the most notable. A new, modular watch face is set to make an appearance, which borrows heavily from the Modular Ultra watch face. 

The new watch face is said to have removed the large complication in the center, the three smaller complications above the clock and the surrounding information around the bezel. What’s left is a stripped-down version of the original: A massive clock that takes up the top two-thirds of the display, with three small complication options below it. 

Simplifying this specific watch face could be an attempt to make it more approachable for the standard Apple Watch lineup, while providing glanceable information with the three complication options. 

Apple Watch users are set to get another watch face before WatchOS 27. With the release of WatchOS 26.5, a new Pride Luminance watch face will be introduced, alongside an accompanying watch band in time for Pride month in June. 

A smartwatch getting new watch faces is about as exciting as telling time itself. It’s not particularly exciting — even if it’s something that’s trickled down from a higher-end model. 

An Apple representative didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

There is no doubt that Apple needs to diversify its processor supply chain, but Samsung and Intel are weak alternatives next to TSMC. Apple may try anyway.

Rumors have come and gone about Apple buying Intel for its US foundries, but something about that idea stuck. More recent rumors suggested Apple could start relying on Intel for Apple Silicon production as soon as 2027 or 2028.

According to a new report from Bloomberg, Apple has been considering Intel and Samsung to build “main device chips” for some time. While the recent chip and memory shortage has added some pressure, Apple had allegedly been making these considerations well before the current situation.

Samsung makes sense as an option because it is the distant number two chip fabricator to TSMC. It has the capabilities of meeting Apple’s strict quality demands, though it would be vastly limited on capacity.

Intel has been repeatedly mentioned in many rumors for various reasons. There was a time when it seemed Intel would dissolve, but it was revived thanks to a controversial 10% stake purchased from the US government under Trump.

The company even approached Apple for a direct investment, though it appears that nothing ever came from that.

Even if the Intel and TSMC’s joint venture results in some Apple chip production in the United States, it would be a paltry amount that barely put a dent in TSMC’s monopoly. However, it would surely score some brownie points with the US administration.

The report suggests that no decision has been made and Apple may not move forward with any new partners. TSMC continues to be the producer of Apple Silicon with over 60% of that made in Taiwan.

Apple is stuck between a rock and a hard place, as is the rest of the world. TSMC has been one of the few companies the world can rely on for advanced silicon, and if China decides to invade, it could devastate the global economy.

At this point, it seems Apple’s only options are strengthening its rival Samsung or embracing the flailing Intel. This situation could be among the defining aspects of John Ternus’ tenure as CEO, though some are apparently more worried about retiring executives.

from the many-wrenches-in-many-gears dept

The administration isn’t exactly winning here. The GOP has been opposed to a clean reauthorization since its first brush with warrantless surveillance back during the Biden administration. GOP members weren’t upset that the FBI routinely abused the NSA’s Section 702 collections to access US persons’ communications… unless those communications happened to be theirs.

Despite their mostly-performative opposition, Section 702 was again given a clean reauthorization. This time around, the GOP seems even more reluctant to give these powers a pass, despite it being clear President Trump would like this to happen.

Trump’s interest is more selfish than most. While he too has been performatively critical of the surveillance that swept up some of his MAGA buddies during Biden’s term in office, he’d definitely like for his FBI and DOJ to be able to warrantlessly surveil Americans he doesn’t like. Since both entities are nothing more than willing enablers of Trump’s vindictive whims, allowing the FBI to warrantlessly access US persons’ communications probably sounds wonderful. And since it appears he doesn’t believe there will ever be a regime change, he has no qualms about extending these spy powers in perpetuity with zero modifications, including those ordered by FISA court judges.

Somehow, even his party loyalists are reluctant to appease him. Section 702 has been on the verge of expiration multiple times, with only the periodic placement on temporary life support keeping these powers from being relegated to history.

With the powers set to expire at the end of April, the GOP offered up something halfway between a Hail Mary and deliberate sabotage, as Politico reports. While the House did manage to pass a three-year extension of Section 702, GOP House members added a rider that ensures this particular version wouldn’t be greenlit by the Senate.

The Senate is unlikely to clear the House-passed extension, which will be sent over with an unrelated, permanent ban on the Federal Reserve’s ability to issue a digital currency attached.

That provision was included at the behest of ultraconservatives, but it is so divisive across the Capitol that it has stalled a major affordable housing package for months. Senate Majority Leader John Thune earlier this week warned that the digital currency ban was “not happening” as part of spy law renewal.

Whether this clause was meant to keep the government from competing with Trump’s private sector offerings or just there to deter the Fed from paying closer attention to cryptocurrency market hardly matters. When John Thune is giving it a preemptive thumbs down, it’s a non-starter.

The Senate, however, received this GOP-spiked can and has only managed to kick it a bit further down the road. While some cynicism is warranted, it also buys time for surveillance reform advocates to gather the information they need to push back against yet another clean re-authorization.

The Senate approved the punt by a voice vote Thursday afternoon before the House passed it under fast-track procedures on a 261-111 vote.

As part of a deal Senate leaders cut with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) to speed up the extension’s passage ahead of the midnight deadline, Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.), the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, will send a letter telling the Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the Justice Department to declassify an annual 702 court opinion within 15 days so it can be used as part of the negotiations.

This is not an unreasonable ask. The public has a right to know what the government thinks it can get away with under this surveillance power. What has always been pitched as a foreign-facing collection has been shown, for years, to be routinely accessed by Intelligence Community agencies for the sole purpose of accessing US persons’ communications without a warrant or even direct FISA court approval.

That an aggrieved Republican party may actually result in Section 702 reform is something that was never on anyone’s bingo card, especially since it’s usually been the same handful of Democratic party senators who have pushed back against these spy powers — something they have consistently done even when their own party has occupied the Oval Office.

Will reform actually happen this time? If history is any indication, a majority of Congressional reps will find some way to talk themselves out of their objections just in time to make it a problem for the next administration to solve. But there seems to be enough bipartisan opposition to a clean re-up to give reform a fighting chance.

Filed Under: fbi, fisa, gop, nsa, section 702, surveillance powers, surveillance state, trump administration, warrantless searches