Connect with us

Tech

Founders of long-lost weather app Dark Sky return with a new forecast platform, and it’s already better than Apple’s unreliable flagship weather predictions

Published

on


  • Dark Sky founders have launched a new forecast app, Acme Weather
  • The new app displays alternate forecast readings to show weather changes that could occur throughout the day
  • It’s also added a community reporting tool, as well as refined custom notifications settings

Remember the days of the Dark Sky weather app before it was dissolved by Apple? Well, its creators are back with an alternative that acknowledges that weather forecasts are often very wrong.

The new weather forecast platform, called Acme Weather, is now available to download on iOS devices, with plans to bring it to Android already in the works. You can try it out with a two-week free trial, and then it requires a $25 yearly subscription fee, working out a lot cheaper than Dark Sky’s $3.99 monthly charge.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

How U Business’ new 3-Line Bundle with free flagship phone works

Published

on

[This is a sponsored article with U Business.]

U Business just launched a new mobile device bundle to solve one of the biggest headaches for growing companies: getting teams properly equipped without burning cash upfront.

The U Biz 3-Line Bundle is a limited-time offer that packages multiple business lines together under one plan, with free flagship smartphones. Yes, including the latest Apple iPhone 15 and Samsung Galaxy S25.

Designed to make connectivity easier, it’s built on U Mobile’ 5G network to support the day-to-day needs of Malaysian entrepreneurs and SMEs, regardless of whether your team is desk-bound or constantly on the move.

Advertisement

Here’s everything you need to know about the new U Biz 3-Line Bundle.

The smarter business upgrade

As mentioned, the bundle gives businesses three mobile lines under a single plan, available with either the U Biz 68 or U Biz 98. Each line comes with a free flagship 5G smartphone, with no upfront payment required for the devices.

Instead of buying phones separately and managing multiple subscriptions, this limited-time offer bundle allows companies to consolidate your mobile needs into one structured plan. 

Image Credit: U Business

In today’s Instagram and TikTok-driven world, flagship 5G smartphones are now a necessary productivity tool for businesses. Yet, buying several devices at once may not be financially strategic as it can strain cash flow, especially when paired with recurring operational expenses.

With the U Biz 3-Line Bundle, entrepreneurs and SMEs are able to spread those costs into predictable monthly payments. 

Advertisement

What’s more if this new bundle includes flagship 5G devices. Businesses can choose between premium iOS and Android options, including the Apple iPhone 15 and Samsung Galaxy S25.

Access to these newer flagship 5G devices means that the team is able to enjoy stronger performance and longer software support. Thereby translating to more reliable day-to-day work tools.

Business performance without compromise

Businesses get to choose between the U Biz 68 (which starts from RM68/month per line) and the U Biz 98 (which starts from RM98/month per line). 

Image Credit: U Business

Both plans are built for high-usage business environments. On the data front, users get up to 1,000GB of 5G high-speed data, supporting faster downloads, smoother video calls, real-time cloud collaboration, and reliable hotspot usage across teams.

Communication-wise, the bundle includes unlimited local calls, so teams can stay connected internally and with clients without worrying about extra charges.

Advertisement

There’s also free global roaming in over 60 destinations, useful for businesses that have regional travel needs or cross-border operations.

By combining multiple lines and devices under one bundle, companies can better optimise their monthly expenses. 

Image Credit: ZDNET / TechRadar

All-in-one connectivity for SMEs

As Malaysia’s 5G ecosystem continues to expand, having access to a strong 5G network becomes increasingly important for businesses that operate across multiple locations.

Whether you’re a new startup or a business scaling up, the U Biz 3-Line Bundle is suited for teams of all sizes who want to stay connected without breaking the bank, regardless of where work takes you.

So if your team is seeking premium devices, then this is one bundle deal you do not want to miss. 

Advertisement

To sign up or learn more about the U Biz 3-Line Bundle, check out the website here.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Meta AI Security Researcher Said an OpenClaw Agent Ran Amok on Her Inbox

Published

on

Meta AI security researcher Summer Yue posted a now-viral account on X describing how an OpenClaw agent she had tasked with sorting through her overstuffed email inbox went rogue, deleting messages in what she called a “speed run” while ignoring her repeated commands from her phone to stop.

“I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb,” Yue wrote, sharing screenshots of the ignored stop prompts as proof. Yue said she had previously tested the agent on a smaller “toy” inbox where it performed well enough to earn her trust, so she let it loose on the real thing. She believes the larger volume of data triggered compaction — a process where the context window grows too large and the agent begins summarizing and compressing its running instructions, potentially dropping ones the user considers critical.

The agent may have reverted to its earlier toy-inbox behavior and skipped her last prompt telling it not to act. OpenClaw is an open-source AI agent designed to run as a personal assistant on local hardware.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

BluOS Partners with airable to Enhance Radio and Podcast Discovery Across NAD, Bluesound, PSB and More

Published

on

Tens of millions of people listen to podcasts and stream internet radio every day. The challenge isn’t access, it’s organization. With content spread across multiple apps and platforms, discovery can feel fragmented, and for many listeners that means sticking to the familiar rather than finding something new.

BluOS, the premium multi-room audio software platform from Lenbrook Media Group is addressing that with a new partnership with airable. The first phase integrates airable’s extensive global catalog of internet radio stations and podcasts directly into the BluOS Controller app.

The update gives BluOS users centralized access to a wide range of programming, from independent shows like the eCoustics Podcast to widely followed titles such as The Joe Rogan Experience, The Daily, and thousands of global radio stations. Rather than requiring separate apps, content is surfaced within the BluOS interface itself, with browsing tools organized by country, genre, city, and newly added stations.

Because BluOS operates as the software layer across hardware brands including Bluesound, NAD Electronics, PSB Speakers, DALI, Monitor Audio, Cyrus Audio, and Roksan, the integration rolls out across a broad installed base without requiring new hardware.

Advertisement

The goal is straightforward: streamline radio and podcast discovery inside the same control environment users already rely on for music streaming and multi-room playback.

bluos-airable-iphone-app-popular-podcasts

What Is airable?

airable is a Germany-based media services provider that supplies internet radio and podcast aggregation to audio brands, automakers, and streaming platforms.

In simple terms, airable is the infrastructure layer. It licenses, organizes, and maintains access to a massive catalogue of global radio stations and podcasts, then integrates that catalogue into partner ecosystems through APIs and backend services.

Rather than each company negotiating station agreements or building its own discovery engine, airable handles:

Advertisement
  • Aggregation of tens of thousands of global radio stations
  • Podcast indexing and catalog updates
  • Metadata, categorization, and search tools
  • Geographic portals (country, city, genre browsing)
  • Ongoing catalogue maintenance and scalability

For platforms like BluOS, airable acts as the content backbone behind the scenes. The user experience lives inside the BluOS Controller app, but the station and podcast database, discovery structure, and updates are powered by airable’s media services platform.

It’s not a consumer-facing brand most listeners recognize — and that’s intentional. It operates quietly in the background, enabling centralized radio and podcast access without requiring users to jump between separate apps.

bluos-airable-iphone-app-popular-podcasts

The Bottom Line

By integrating airable into BluOS, Lenbrook adds a large, structured catalogue of global radio stations and podcasts directly inside the BluOS Controller app. That means no separate radio app, no bouncing between podcast platforms, and no fragmented search experience.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Who benefits? Existing BluOS users across BluesoundNAD Electronics, PSB SpeakersDALIMonitor AudioCyrus Audio, and Roksan. They get broader access and improved discovery through a software update, not a hardware upgrade.

Advertisement

In practical terms, BluOS becomes a more complete listening hub with music, radio, and podcasts in one control environment without adding complexity.

For more information: bluos.io

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

James Cameron Complains About Netflix/Warner Bros Merger, Doesn’t Acknowledge A Paramount Deal Would Be Much Worse

Published

on

from the gargantuan-ego dept

We’ve explained in detail how Larry Ellison is trying to scuttle Netflix’s planned merger with Warner Brothers because he wants to buy CNN and HBO, and, as he’s doing with CBS (and now TikTok) turn them into a safe space for right wing zealots, autocrats, and oligarchs. He’s unsubtly trying to build the kind of autocrat-friendly state television we’ve seen arise in places like Orban’s Hungary.

Since Donald Trump and MAGA want the same thing, they’ve been helping Ellison’s quest along, first by launching a campaign against “woke Netflix” across right wing media, and more recently by launching a fake DOJ “antitrust investigation” that scrutinizes the Netflix Warner Bros merger “to protect the public interest,” but ignores the fact that a Paramount/Warner tie up would be arguably worse.

Enter Director James Cameron, who last week decided to “help” by writing a publicized letter to Senator Mike Lee, lamenting the Netflix Warner Brothers merger (and only the Netflix merger) as “disastrous to the motion picture business.” Cameron, who in the letter calls himself a “humble movie farmer,” seems to mostly be concerned with the a possible shortening of the 45-day theater-to-streaming window:

He’s also doubtful Netflix would stick to its pledge about keeping movies in theaters for a set amount of time; his letter cited a 17-day theatrical window that was cited in an earlier Deadline report, rather than the more recently mentioned 45-day window.

“What administrative body will hold them to task if they slowly sunset their so-called commitment to theatrical releases?” Cameron wondered.

Advertisement

Traditional theater owners have been particularly and understandably sensitive about the shortening of this window since COVID demonstrated the outdated nature of such arbitrary restrictions. Major chains like AMC haven’t helped themselves on this front; their biggest innovation of late has been to saddle brick-and-mortar theater visitors with more ads than ever.

Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos didn’t take Cameron’s public grievances well, saying he’d already met with Cameron about maintaining the 45-day release window, and lamented Cameron’s participation in a “Paramount disinformation campaign:”

“I met with James personally in late December and laid out for him our 45-day commitment to theatrical exhibition of films and to the Warner Bros slate,” Sarandos told Fox Business’ The Claman Countdown today in the latest sit-down in the exec’s seemingly never-ending media blitz this week. “I have talked about that commitment in the press countless times. I swore under oath in front of the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust that that’s what we would be doing.”  

“So I am … I’m particularly surprised and disappointed that James chose to be part of the Paramount disinformation campaign that’s been going on for months about this deal,” Sarandos said, sticking it at the same time to the Oscar winner and his David Ellison-owned WB rival.

The weird part about Cameron’s missive is he doesn’t mention Paramount at all in his letter to Lee, despite the fact that it’s extremely likely that Paramount would be just as bad on shortening release windows. And given that Paramount and Warner have way more structural similarities than Netflix and Warner, the number of layoffs would likely be significantly worse.

Advertisement

This is before you even get to the fact that Larry Ellison is clearly gobbling up media giants in service to our violent kakistocracy, something that seems kind of important to mention if you’re going to inject yourself into the middle of the debate. Cameron mentions none of this; either because he doesn’t know, or because he was potentially made promises by Ellison and Paramount and didn’t want to be transparent about it (neither of which is good).

None of this is to say that a Netflix Warner Brothers merger would be great for consumers or the market. Media consolidation always results in layoffs, higher prices and steadily eroded product quality. Ideally you’d block all additional media consolidation and impose meaningful limits. But that’s simply not happening under Trump, making the Netflix Warner tie up the best of a bunch of bad options.

Anybody trying to do any good (and that includes Dem lawmakers) in the regulatory reality we currently inhabit would likely have to concur Netflix owning Warner is better than Ellison owning the entirety of U.S. media. Especially given what we’ve all been witnessing over at CBS (and know from years of watching Ellison’s nonexistent ethics at Oracle). Strange days, strange bedfellows.

Filed Under: consolidation, film, james cameron, larry ellison, media, mike lee, release windows, state television, streaming, ted sarandos, theaters

Companies: netflix, paramount, warner bros. discovery

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Researchers can now detect tampered smartphones from miles away

Published

on

Researchers from the American Institute of Physics’ publishing arm have developed a technique that could change how smartphones are inspected for tampering and hidden modifications. Instead of physically examining a device, the team demonstrated a way to detect whether a smartphone has been altered using radio-frequency signals from a distance.

The work introduces what researchers describe as a robust over-the-air testing platform that analyzes how a smartphone’s radio hardware behaves when it communicates wirelessly. The idea is surprisingly simple. Every phone’s radio components produce a unique “fingerprint” when transmitting signals. If a device has been modified, damaged, or compromised, that fingerprint changes in subtle but measurable ways.

The team showed that this method can reliably distinguish between original, untouched phones and devices that have been tampered with. Because the system works wirelessly, it could theoretically be used to check phones without needing physical access. That opens the door to entirely new ways of verifying device integrity.

Why remote phone verification matters

Detecting hardware tampering today usually requires physical inspections or specialized lab testing, which makes large-scale verification difficult in places like airports, offices, or secure facilities. The new approach aims to change that by using a remote test setup that analyzes a phone’s radio-frequency behavior and compares it to known baselines to spot signs of modification.

This could open the door to practical uses across multiple industries. Governments and enterprises could screen devices entering sensitive environments, manufacturers could verify products throughout supply chains, and even second-hand marketplaces could confirm that phones haven’t been altered before resale.

The research is still experimental, but it reflects a growing shift toward hardware-level security. While everyday users may never interact with this technology directly, the idea of phones being quietly verified from a distance points to a future where device trust checks happen behind the scenes.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Which Power Tool Brand Is Best?

Published

on





The age old question of which tool to buy still keeps home improvers and professionals up at night. Every brand delivers its own strengths, and no two tools will provide exactly the same performance or experience. This makes crowning a definitive champion among the field of excellent options challenging, if not outright impossible. The market is constantly shifting, and today’s top dog may be relegated to a lesser status tomorrow thanks to a new release or even a recall notice on a tool. In 2026, Pro Tool Reviews named Milwaukee the best cordless power toolmaker, but the year prior OnlineTradesman gave the honor of “Best-in-Trade Winner” to DeWalt, with Makita earning the runner up spot. Countless outlets focusing on the tool marketplace have developed numerous rankings systems and come to varying conclusions on the value and positioning of these massively popular brands.

One thing is certain, however: These three toolmakers are virtually unchallenged at the podium when considering the power tool ecosystem. While they may trade places frequently, other competitors rarely knock the trio from this perch. In our own testing and research, Milwaukee claimed the top spot, followed by DeWalt and then Makita. It’s important, however, to note that the differences between the toolmakers is razor thin, and all three will serve users exceedingly well. I’ve had the opportunity to use numerous power tools from all three brands, and own cordless tools from two (and corded implements from the third). My experience helped ground the research, but pricing, power, user reviews, and other data points played a primary role in drawing these conclusions.

Advertisement

Catalog range: Makita’s coverage takes the cake

Each of the three tool brands offer something unique to buyers seeking niche equipment. That much is undeniably true, and so it can be difficult to pin down a general scope that hits the mark for every buyer. Milwaukee makes some specialized tools like a power trowel and a drain cleaning air gun. Makita offers gems like an LXT cooler/warmer and coffee machine. DeWalt’s unique options include things like floor sanders and a wide range of pneumatic tools. There’s also the ecosystem hump to get over. For tool owners already invested in one of these brands’ cordless offerings, buying something new comes with the requirement to also tack on batteries and charging equipment. This can dissuade someone from branching out, even if their brand of choice doesn’t make a specific tool required to handle a job on their to-do list.

One approach that can be illustrative of a brand’s value to the generalist is the size of its mainline catalog. All three manufacturers offer numerous product lineups, but each delivers a primary range to the market featuring the bulk of their cordless power tools. Makita’s coverage is the most expansive in this regard, with over 350 LXT tools in its 18V/36V lineup. Milwaukee’s M18 cordless system ranks second here, with over 325 tools, including both its standard and Fuel badged options, and DeWalt brings up the rear with over 250 20V Max XR tools. It’s worth noting, however, that Milwaukee has consistently been an innovator at the cutting edge of needs experienced by pro users, so there’s a bit of bonus heft to the red and black power tool option.

Advertisement

Power output: Milwaukee reigns supreme

Output capability is a constant concern for anyone reaching for power tools. These implements are only as good as the force they can apply to a fastener, board, or other workpiece element, after all; a tool that doesn’t radically improve upon the force you can generate by hand is one that’s frankly worthless. Fortunately, none of these three primary competitors can realistically be accused of lacking the power necessary to accomplish tasks. All three make heavy duty tools as well as delicate force producers for use in nuanced application or removal tasks.

If it’s power you’re after, though, Milwaukee is the undisputed leader of the pack. Milwaukee tools, on the whole, deliver the best in power output across the trio, but this sometimes comes at the detriment of control or rotational speed. Sheer muscle is found most easily here, but that’s not always the goal; buyers will want to think about the actual demands of their typical job parameters before simply investing in the tool with the highest torque output or deepest cut capacity while resisting bind ups. With that being said, if you’re fastening substantial timbers for emergency preparations or building a large structure, Milwaukee’s added power output may be a welcome addition. DeWalt offers a strong showing, too, but lags behind Milwaukee with added emphasis on battery capabilities, tool integrations, and ergonomics. Makita brings up the rear while leaning even more significantly into functional enhancements beyond sheer force production.

Advertisement

Integrated technologies: Makita’s high-tech chops shine

Makita’s ergonomic designs are far and away the best of the bunch. Similar attention is paid to elements like its STAR Protection Computer Controls and anti-vibration technologies. Makita tools feature numerous exclusive technological upgrades that don’t exist in other product catalogs. This sets the Makita tool ecosystem apart from its competitors as an innovative brand with lots of quality of life enhancements to offer its users. Coupled with the large catalog, Makita makes a strong case for itself as a flagship option that any kind of tool user might happily settle upon when shopping for near gear.

DeWalt is also a force to be reckoned with in the premium functionality department. The brushless motors the company uses in its power tools are a highlight of the brand’s technological prowess, even as brushless power production is featured across all three brands. DeWalt’s batteries are also more durable than Milwaukee’s offerings, and feature FlexVolt capability as well as a higher top end with a 15Ah option. Milwaukee sits comfortable at the bottom of the pack here.

Advertisement

Pricing: Milwaukee (and sometimes DeWalt) offer the best cost efficiency

In many comparisons across these three tool brands, pricing is largely similar. There’s not a huge divergence across the board, but some trends do start to emerge as more tools are stacked up against one another. While each brand will undoubtedly offer the cheapest tool of the three in some categories and at certain times (with sale pricing and phase outs muddying the waters even further), on average, Makita is the most expensive of the three. Where Milwaukee and DeWalt land in relation to one another is, surprisingly, a matter of perspective.

Because Milwaukee’s M18 range features both a standard lineup and its enhanced Fuel tool system, making direct comparisons can be a little difficult. Among its flagship M18 tools, Milwaukee comes in as the cheapest overall manufacturer in this comparison, with DeWalt notably more expensive. We performed a roundup of five common home improvement and jobsite tools (drills, jigsaws, miter saws, angle grinders, and multitools) to get a direct sense of the typical pricing buyers can expect. Makita’s average LXT tool price was $311.60, while DeWalt averaged $246.20 across its 20V Max XR range. Milwaukee averaged $271.80 when considering Fuel tools exclusively and $231.80 with three standard M18 models subbed in where applicable. Because the difference is marginal when evaluating the premium solutions in Milwaukee’s stable, and across the breadth of the Milwaukee catalog it tends to come out as the more cost-effective option, DeWalt necessarily sinks into the second position in terms of overall pricing.

Advertisement

User reviews: DeWalt digs out the best overall user rating by a hair

User feedback is perhaps even more important than any singular datapoint when comparing the tools that brands offer to the market. In many instances, the differences between tools are slight, and can come down entirely to personal preference over any distinguishable advantage that an individual unit holds over its competition. Naturally a smaller drill that doesn’t sacrifice power offers better access in tight spaces, and a circular saw with a deeper cut depth can handle increased demands. But none of these brands provides every tool in their arsenal with a functional range that exceeds the alternatives. However, user experiences across the board can be instructive when trying to understand how well each brand hits the mark it’s looking to set with its equipment.

Across a selection of the five standard home improvement and jobsite tools we looked at earlier, DeWalt earned the highest overall rating with a 4.778 average score (out of 5). The brand’s tools collected a total of 32,781 reviews. Second place went to Milwaukee, with 8,406 reviewers giving it a slightly lower 4.761 average across both its Fuel products and standard M18 models. Makita brought up the rear with a 4.717 average across 4,640 reviews. It’s worth noting that Milwaukee’s score is heavily dependent on the treatment of its Fuel and standard model ranges. Focusing on Fuel-badged tools alone boosts its score to 4.794 over 6,180 reviews, bumping it into first position. Substituting standard models where applicable, the score sinks down to 4.646 with 7,008 total reviews, and dropping firmly into last place among the three brands. With this in mind, a combined score feels to be the most just approach to evaluating its offerings.

Advertisement

Methodology

We ranked the three brands based on points accrued for each category, with first being worth 3 points, second yielding 2 points, and third adding 1 point to the tally. For the final two categories, we evaluated pricing and user feedback on five mainline tools that many buyers will either have already or prioritize for typical, future projects. They were the brand’s full-sized offerings of drill/driver, miter saw, jigsaw, oscillating multitool, and angle grinder. After finalizing the scores, Milwaukee came out with 11 points, DeWalt with 10, and Makita had earned 9. It’s worth noting that Milwaukee earned top marks in price based on overall costs across the flagship M18 range, but when evaluating only Fuel-badged tools the margin between the brands was so thin that the increase in price actually swaps their overall point totals and therefore their positions.

However, it seems appropriate to score Milwaukee on the breadth of its M18 range and not just the most expensive end of the products within that segment of the catalog. This choice does serve to highlight the value that each brand brings to the table, with all three offering excellent tools that users can gain a lot of value from, regardless of their personal preference.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

CarGurus data breach exposes information of 12.4 million accounts

Published

on

CarGurus data breach exposes information of 12.4 million accounts

The ShinyHunters extortion group has published personal information in more than 12 million records allegedly stolen from CarGurus, a U.S.-based digital auto platform.

CarGurus is a publicly traded automotive research and shopping company that operates in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. Its website has an estimated 40 million monthly visitors and helps people find, compare, and contact sellers of new and used vehicles.

On February 21, the threat group published a 6.1GB archive containing 12.4 million records, saying it was from CarGurus. A day later, the HaveIBeenPwned (HIBP) data breach monitoring and alerting platform added the dataset, listing the following data types as compromised:

Wiz
  • Email addresses
  • IP addresses
  • Full names
  • Phone numbers
  • Physical addresses
  • User account IDs
  • Finance pre-qualification application data
  • Finance application outcomes
  • Dealer account details
  • Subscription information

Although CarGurus has not released an official statement disclosing a data breach and did not respond to BleepingComputer’s request for comment, it is important to note that HIBP attempts to confirm the validity/authenticity of the leaked records before adding them.

HIBP reports that 70% of the leaked data was already on its database from previous incidents, so roughly 3.7 million records are fresh. Since the information is freely available for download, cybercriminals could take advantage of it for phishing attacks.

Advertisement
CarGurus listed as a victim on ShinyHunters data leak site
ShinyHunters lists CarGurus as their victim
Source: BleepingComputer

CarGurus users are advised to stay alert for potentially malicious communications and scam attempts leveraging the leaked information.

The ShinyHunters data extortion group has been very active recently, claiming multiple attacks on large companies and leaking their data when negotiations reached a dead end.

The most recent examples include Dutch telecommunications provider Odido, ad tech firm Optimizely, fintech firm Figure, outerwear brand Canada Goose, restaurant chain Panera Bread, online dating company Match Group, and music streaming platform SoundCloud.

The threat group typically uses social engineering, most commonly voice phishing, to breach organizations, directing victims to credential-harvesting pages that grant them access to SaaS platforms such as Salesforce, Okta, and Microsoft 365.

Previous ShinyHunters campaigns also involved tricking employees into installing malicious OAuth applications that granted them API-level read access to customer data tables inside Salesforce instances. 

Advertisement

Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.

In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Astell&Kern HC5 Review: Flagship Sound in a Pocket-Size Dongle?

Published

on

Astell&Kern is best known for building some of the most over-engineered and unapologetically expensive digital audio players on the planet. From established flagships like the SP4000 to more experimental plays like the PD10, the brand has long leaned on premium materials, ambitious engineering, and pricing that assumes you’re already committed. The HC5 takes a different route. It’s a portable USB DAC that promises flagship-grade DNA in a far smaller, supposedly more affordable package. However, at nearly $500, it’s priced squarely in entry-level DAP territory and staring down serious competition.

So, is the HC5 a smart way to get A&K sound without carrying a brick? Or is it an awkward middle ground that costs too much for what it is? Let’s get into it.

Build

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-connected-campfire-andromeda-10-iems
The HC5 paired with the Campfire Audio Andromeda 10

The HC5 features an aluminum chassis with a small OLED screen on its top face. The display shows key details such as volume level, playback rate, and connection info. The sides of the chassis are gently beveled, which aids in ergonomics. The HC5’s screen is bright-enough to be viewed easily in sunlight, but no so bright that it is distracting in a dim room. That’s good, since A&K did not implement any way to adjust screen brightness.

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-left-side

The left side of the chassis features a single button and volume scroll wheel. Both are aluminum, and neither are set very firmly. The scroll wheel has a bit of wiggle, even when not being rotated. The side button is a little better, but isn’t as tactile as you can find on other devices. A little give on a button usually doesn’t bother me much, but a near-$500 USB-C dongle should offer a top-notch physical interface as well. 

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-input-bottom

The top of the HC5 houses the USB-C input and the scroll wheel. From this angle, the wheel’s slight slack is visible even when the unit is at rest—noticeable, but not catastrophic. The USB-C port, by contrast, is rock solid. There’s no play or flex when a cable is connected, which is genuinely confidence-inspiring.

Around back, the HC5 offers both 3.5mm single-ended and 4.4mm balanced outputs. Both sockets are firmly mounted in the chassis and, like the USB-C port, remain completely wiggle-free. Astell&Kern also gets the accessories right: the included USB-C-to-USB-C and USB-C-to-Lightning cables are thick, well-finished, and reassuringly sturdy. They’re double-shielded as well, which should keep signal interference from crashing the party.

astell-kern-pd10-hc5-audioengine-hxl
Left to right: Astell&Kern PD10 DAP, Astell&Kern HC5, Audioengine HXL

It’s worth noting that the HC5, while considerably more compact than a full-size A&K DAP, is nearly twice the volume of many other high-end, high-performance dongle DACs. Some of that bulk comes from the inclusion of a screen; some of it is down to Astell&Kern’s signature scroll wheel. Fair enough, but a portable DAC still needs to be portable.

Advertisement

The HC5 isn’t enormous, but it’s large enough to be awkward. It doesn’t fit comfortably in some stock IEM cases, and it’s also too big for most common MagSafe DAC holders. That puts it in an uncomfortable middle ground: smaller than a DAP, yet noticeably less convenient than the best compact dongles it’s competing against.

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-adapter-cables

DAC

The A&K HC5 is the very first portable DAC to feature the AKM AK4499EX. This is a high-end chip that Astell&Kern typically reserves for flagship-level products. It’s paired with an AK4191EQ for a proper premium audio experience. A&K integrates this novel application of these chips with their flagship-derived “high-driving mode” tech that allows them to achieve a pretty impressive power-to-size ratio. 

Sample Rates

The HC5 offers broad support for high-resolution audio formats, with no obvious limitations for portable use. It handles PCM up to 768 kHz at 32-bit resolution and supports native DSD playback through DSD512 in stereo.

Supported formats:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
  • PCM: 8 kHz – 768 kHz (8 / 16 / 24 / 32-bit)
  • DSD (Native):
    • DSD64 (2.8 MHz), stereo
    • DSD128 (5.6 MHz), stereo
    • DSD256 (11.2 MHz), stereo
    • DSD512 (22.4 MHz), stereo

This puts the HC5 in line with other high-end portable DACs in terms of format compatibility, without introducing format-related constraints.

Output Level

Power output in portable USB-C DACs is constrained by several factors, including the power-delivery limits of Android and iOS devices, as well as the USB-C standard itself. Even so, not all portable DACs are created equal.

The HC5 offers stronger output than most, which isn’t surprising given its larger-than-average footprint. Its 3.5mm single-ended output delivers 2.5 Vrms, while the 4.4mm balanced output reaches 5 Vrms—placing it ahead of many competing premium dongle DACs in terms of available voltage.

Output Impedance

Output impedance plays an important role in how a DAC interacts with headphones and IEMs. Higher output impedance can alter frequency response which can be perceived as added warmth particularly with sensitive, multi-driver IEMs that use complex crossovers.

The HC5’s output impedance is low by portable standards. The 4.4mm balanced output measures 1.1 ohms, while the 3.5mm single-ended output is even lower at 0.5 ohms. At these levels, audible effects are minimal, with the 1.1-ohm balanced output only likely to be noticeable on the most sensitive multi-driver IEMs.

Advertisement

Listening

astell-kern-hc5-dongle-dac-campfire-andromeda-10-iems-atop
The Campfire Audio Andromeda 10 paired with the Astell&Kern HC5

At 5 Vrms, the HC5 has enough output to comfortably drive most common headphones. Even higher-end models like the Meze 109 Pro and Audio-Technica ATH-ADX3000 reach satisfying volume levels with solid dynamic range. Less-demanding planar magnetic headphones also perform well, though listeners who prefer very high listening levels or who use more power-hungry designs may still benefit from a dedicated desktop amplifier.

campfire-audio-astrolith-iems
Campfire Audio Astrolith

For portable use, the HC5 is clearly capable. Demanding planar IEMs like the Campfire Audio Astrolith reach high listening levels without strain, allowing the drivers to perform as intended. The HC5’s low, but not zero output impedance doesn’t meaningfully alter the sound. Sensitive IEMs such as the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2019 remain stable and consistent, with no obvious tonal shifts when switching between the 3.5mm single ended and 4.4mm balanced outputs.

More importantly, that consistency was not limited to ultra sensitive earphones. Regardless of the IEM or full size headphone used, the overall tonal balance remained intact. There was no sense of the balanced output adding artificial weight, nor the single ended output sounding comparatively thinner or softer.

There is no such thing as a completely neutral source or amplifier. Every design leaves a fingerprint, whether subtle or obvious. That said, this one comes very close. It avoids editorializing the signal, preserves timbre with discipline, and lets the transducer do the talking.

The Bottom Line

The Astell&Kern HC5 is a truly-premium portable DAC. Buyers that want to experience Astell&Kern’s flagship audio hardware can finally do so without having to drop many thousands on their top-tier DAPs, like the SP4000. That said, A&K needs to improve their manufacturing tolerances to reduce slack on both the volume wheel and the side-button. A nearly $500 device should be as premium to physically interact with as it is to listen-to. Buyers that treat audio as a price-no-object experience have a lot to like about the HC5 . However, those that are looking to maximize price-to-performance will want to check out cheaper, similarly-powerful dongles like the Audioengine HXL or Campfire Audio Relay.

Advertisement

Pros

  • Impeccable sound quality
  • True flagship performance
  • Lightweight and ergonomic
  • Runs cool

Cons

  • Expensive
  • Scroll wheel and button lack firmness
  • Too large for common MagSafe setups

Where to buy:

You can find the HC5 for sale at Bloom Audio and Moon Audio for $489.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Physics Professor Credits Collaboration for Her Success

Published

on

For Cinzia DaVià, collaboration isn’t just a buzzword. It’s the approach she applies to all her professional endeavors.

From her contributions to the development of a silicon sensor used in CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) particle accelerator experiments to her current research on portable energy generation solutions, there’s a common thread.

Cinzia DaVià

Employers

Advertisement

University of Manchester, England;

Stony Brook University, in New York

Job titles

Professor of physics; research professor

Advertisement

Member grade

Senior member

Alma maters

University of Bologna, Italy; University of Glasgow

Advertisement

As a professor of physics at the University of Manchester, in England, and a research professor at Stony Brook University, in New York, she has built strong connections across academic disciplines. Her continued involvement at CERN connects her with a broad array of professionals.

DaVià, an IEEE senior member, says she leverages her expertise and her network of collaborators to solve problems and build solutions. Her efforts include advancing high-energy particle experiments, improving cancer treatments, and mitigating the effects of climate change.

Collaboration is the foundation for any project’s success, she says. She credits IEEE for making many of her professional connections possible.

Even though she is the driving force behind building her alliances, she prefers to shine the spotlight on others, she says. For her, focusing on teamwork is more important than identifying individual contributions.

Advertisement

“The people involved in any project are really the ones to be celebrated,” she says. “The focus should be on them, not me.”

A career influenced by Italian television

As a young child growing up in the Italian Dolomites, her passion for physics was sparked by a popular documentary series, “Astronomia,” an Italian version of Carl Sagan’s renowned “Cosmos” series. The show was DaVià’s introduction to the world of astrophysics. She enrolled at Italy’s Alma Mater Studiorum/University of Bologna, confident she would pursue a degree in astronomy and astrophysics.

A summer internship at CERN in Geneva changed her career trajectory. She helped construct experiments for the Large Electron-Positron collider there. The LEP remains the largest electron-positron accelerator ever. An underground tunnel wide enough to accommodate the LEP’s 27-kilometer circumference was built on the CERN campus. It was Europe’s biggest civil engineering project at the time.

The LEP was designed to validate the standard model of physics, which until then was a theoretical framework that attempted to explain the universe’s building blocks. The experiments—which performed precision measurements of W and Z bosons, the positive and neutral bits central to particle physics—confirmed the standard model.

Advertisement

The LEP also paved the way, figuratively and literally, for CERN’s Large Hadron Collider. Following the LEP’s decommissioning in 2000, it was dismantled to make way for the LHC in the same underground testing tunnel.

As DaVià’s summer internship work on LEP experiments progressed, her professional focus shifted. Her plans to work in astrophysics gradually transitioned to a focus on radiation instrumentation.

After graduating in 1989 with a physics degree, she returned to CERN for a one-year assignment. As she got more involved in research and development for the large collider experiments, her one year turned into 10.

She received a CERN fellowship to help her finish her Ph.D. in physics at the University of Glasgow—which she received in 1997. Her work focused on radiation detectors and their applications in medicine.

Advertisement

“Nothing was programmed,” she says of her career trajectory. “It was always an opportunity that came after another opportunity, and things evolved along the way.”

A fusion of research and results

During her decade at CERN from 1989 to 1999, she contributed to several groundbreaking discoveries. One involved the radiation hardness of silicon sensors at cryogenic temperatures, referred to in physics as the Lazarus effect.

In the world of collider experiments, the silicon sensors function as eyes that capture the first moments of particle creation. The sensors are part of a larger detector unit that takes millions of images per second, helping scientists better understand particle creation.

In large collider experiments, the silicon sensors suffer significant damage from the radiation generated. After repeated exposure, the sensors eventually become nonfunctional.

Advertisement

DaVià’s contributions helped develop the process of reviving the dead detectors by cooling them down to temperatures below -143° C.

Her proudest professional accomplishment, she says, was a different discovery at CERN: Her research helped usher in a new era of large collider experiments.

For many years, researchers there used planar silicon sensors in collider experiments. But as the large colliders grew more sophisticated and capable, the traditional planar silicon design couldn’t withstand the extreme radiation present at the epicenter of collider collisions.

DaVià’s research contributed to the development, together with inventor Sherwood Parker, of 3D silicon sensors that could withstand extreme radiation.

Advertisement

The new sensors are radiation-resistant and exceptionally fast, she says.

Scientists began replacing planar sensors in the detectors deployed closest to the center of each collision. Planar detectors are still widely used in collider experiments but farther from direct impacts.

The development of the 3D silicon sensor was groundbreaking, but DaVià says she is proud of it for a different reason. The collaborative approach of the cross-functional R&D team she built is the most noteworthy outcome, she says.

Initially, people with conservative scientific views resisted the idea of creating a new sensor technology, she says. She was able to bring together a broad coalition of scientists, researchers, and industry leaders to work together, despite the initial skepticism and competing interests. The team included two companies that were direct competitors.

Advertisement

That type of industry collaboration was unheard of at the time, she says.

“I was able to convince them,” she says, “that working together would be the best and fastest way forward.”

Her approach succeeded. The two companies not only worked side by side but also exchanged proprietary information. They went so far as to agree that if something halted progress for one of them, it would ship everything to the other so production could continue.

DaVià coauthored a book about the project, Radiation Sensors With 3D Electrodes.

Advertisement

DaVià has long been concerned about the impact of extreme weather events, especially on underserved populations. Her interest transformed into action after she attended the American Institute of Architects International and AIA Japan Osaka World Expo last year.

During the symposium, held in June, panelists shared insights about natural disasters in their regions and identified steps that could help mitigate damage and protect lives.

The topics that particularly interested DaVià, she says, were excessive glacial melt in the Himalayas and the lack of tsunami warnings on remote Indonesian islands.

One of the ideas that surfaced during a brainstorming session was that of “smart shelters” that could be deployed in remote areas to assist in recovery efforts. The shelters would provide power and a means of communication during outages.

Advertisement

The concept was inspired by MOVE, an IEEE-USA initiative. The MOVE program provides communities affected by natural disasters with power and communications capabilities. The services are contained within MOVE vehicles and are powered by generators. A single MOVE vehicle can charge up to 100 phones, bolstering communication capabilities for relief agencies and disaster survivors.

DaVià’s knowledge of MOVE guided the evolution of the smart shelter concept. She recognized, however, that the challenge of powering portable shelters needed to be solved. She took the lead and formed a cross-disciplinary team of IEEE members and other professionals to make headway. One result is a planned two-day conference on sustainable entrepreneurship to be held at CERN in October.

“IEEE helps bring people together who might not otherwise connect.”

The goal of the conference, she says, is to “join the dots across different disciplines by involving as many IEEE societies and external experts as possible to work toward deployable solutions that help improve life for people around the world.”

Advertisement

The two-day event will include a competition focusing on solutions for sustainable energy generation and storage systems, she says, adding that entrepreneurs will share their ideas on the second day.

Her commitment to developing solutions to mitigate destruction caused by extreme weather led to her involvement with the IEEE Online Forum on Climate Change Technologies. She led the way in creating the Climate Change Initiative within the IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society (NPSS).

She was the driving force behind securing funding for two of the society’s climate-related events. One was the 2024 Climate Workshop on Nuclear and Plasma Solutions for Energy and Society. The second event, building on the success of the first, was last year’s workshop: Nuclear and Plasma Opportunities for Energy and Society, held in conjunction with the Osaka World Expo.

New paths to guide others

DaVià reduced her involvement at CERN, when she joined the faculty at the University of Manchester as a physics professor. In 2016 she joined Stony Brook University as a research professor in the physics and astronomy department. She divides her time between the two schools.

Advertisement

She still maintains an office at CERN, where she works with students involved with particle physics. She is also an advisory board member of its IdeaSquare, an innovation space where science, technology, and entrepreneurial minds gather to brainstorm and test ideas. The goal is to identify ways to apply innovations generated by high-energy physics experiments to solve global challenges.

DaVià is the radiation detectors and imaging editor of Frontiers in Physics and a cochair of the European Union’s ATTRACT initiative, which promotes radiation imaging research across the continent. She is an active member of the European Physical Society, and she is an IEEE liaison officer for the physics and industry working group of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics.

She has coauthored more than 900 publications.

IEEE as the connector

DaVià’s involvement with IEEE dates back to her undergraduate years, when she was introduced to the organization at a conference sponsored by the IEEE NPSS.

Advertisement

As her career grew, so did her involvement with IEEE.

She remains active with the society as a distinguished lecturer. She is a member of the IEEE Society of Social Implications of Technology, the IEEE Power & Energy Society, and the IEEE Women in Engineering group. She received the 2022 WIE Outstanding Volunteer of the Year Award.

She stays involved in IEEE to help her understand the work being done within each society and identify opportunities for cross-collaboration, she says. She sees such synergies as a key benefit of membership.

“IEEE helps bring people together who might not otherwise connect,” she says. “We are stronger together with IEEE.”

Advertisement

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Collison brothers’ Stripe valued at $159bn as annual letter published

Published

on

In their annual letter, Patrick and John Collison said businesses running on Stripe generated $1.9trn in total volume in 2025, up 34pc on 2024.

The annual Stripe letter published today – signed by its founders, Irish brothers Patrick and John Collison – which coincides with news that Stripe has hit a $159bn valuation with its latest employee tender offer. This is up from a $106bn valuation a year ago, but the founders still appear not to be heading for a public offering.

Stripe said it had signed agreements with investors “to provide liquidity to current and former Stripe employees through a tender offer at a $159bn valuation”, with the majority of funds for the tender offer are being provided by investors including Thrive Capital, Coatue, A16z and others. Stripe said it will also use a portion of its own capital to repurchase shares.

Stripe remained “robustly profitable”, the Collisons’ letter stated, allowing it to continue investing heavily in product development, with more than 350 product updates last year, as well as acquisitions that included programmable wallet company Privy, stablecoin orchestration platform Bridge and Metronome, which “powers the intricate usage-based billing models used by companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Confluent and Nvidia”.

Advertisement

While much of the letter covered recent developments in AI – the brothers believe we are still at the relatively early stages of agentic AI in commerce – they also write at length about the stablecoin payment market which they say doubled to $400bn in 2025.

In September, Stripe teamed up with venture capital firm Paradigm to announce their joint venture Tempo, a blockchain built around stablecoins. Tempo is being jointly incubated by the two companies and is led by Matt Huang, Paradigm’s co-founder and managing partner.

“Tempo is purpose-built for stablecoins and real-world payments, born from Stripe’s experience in global payments and Paradigm’s expertise in crypto tech,” Huang said in a blogpost at the time, adding that Tempo will complement existing crypto infrastructure and offer a way for large enterprises to come on chain, increasing the adoption of crypto tools and infrastructure.

“With Tempo, businesses get dedicated payment lanes, sub-second finality, opt-in privacy, and interoperability with compliance and accounting systems,” the Collisons wrote today. “These features may sound prosaic, but they matter a great deal for infrastructure that supports real-world economic activity. Companies like Visa, Nubank, and Shopify are already testing Tempo for a number of use cases, including global payouts, embedded finance and remittances.”

Advertisement

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025