Apple has had countless patents granted over the smart ring technology it still won’t tell anyone about, but a new one shows just how an Apple Ring might control all of your devices.
Yes, an Apple Ring would surely be a health monitor, and yes, it would likely dominate the fitness market, but it won’t break up marriages. It’s also surely coming some day, sorry Oura, but until now the focus has been on what it will do, not necessarily what it will work with.
That’s changed with the newly-granted patent, “Electronic device system with ring devices.” It starts by discussing how any given user might have multiple devices, including wearable ones, and how it’s therefore a problem determining which one the user wants to use.
“The target electronic device may be identified using a gaze tracking sensor that senses the user’s point-of-gaze,” says the patent, “a radio-frequency sensor that detects a direction in which the user’s device is pointed, or other sensor circuitry for detecting pointing input, gestures, and other user input.”
Advertisement
There is a section of the 20-page patent that refers to what the ring might do by itself, as well as how it fits within Apple’s privacy ethos.
“If desired, a device may be operated in isolation,” it says. “For example a wearable device that is operating in a stand-alone operating mode may perform health monitoring operations… [which] may or may not be shared with other devices.”
But the main part of the proposal regards how “a ring worn on a user’s finger” could “capture real-time readings on the location… orientation… and motion” of the user and his or her hand. “These activities may be used in controlling devices in the system.”
You know. One ring to rule them all.
Advertisement
The proposal is written in typical patent-speak, meaning that it stops to mention every conceivable device from rings to smart watches, to headsets and more. It also takes the time to specify what could be controlled, here ranging from speakers to thermostats and everything in between in order to thwart as many future lawyers as possible.
Concentrating on the repeated description of a ring, though, the one thing that device is not likely to have is gaze tracking. An Apple Vision Pro already does have precisely that, and iPhones scan faces for Face ID.
Apple keeps trying to refer to generic “electronic devices,” but then it goes and shows you a ring – image credit: Apple
But this may be more like the way an iPhone’s “Always On” screen will actually turn off if you’re not looking at it. It’s the modern equivalent of the light in the fridge, but this power-saving feature means the iPhone does know that you’re looking at it.
Advertisement
Maybe that would be enough. If a HomePod could determine that you’re glancing its way, it surely wouldn’t need precision eye tracking. It could then just know to take your waggling finger as meaning you don’t like this track, move on.
Or raising and lowering your hand could be enough to raise or lower the HomePod’s volume. If the HomePod knew you were looking at it, and if the Apple Ring correctly conveyed the gesture you’re trying to make.
Apple’s strength is in its ecosystem
“Electronic device system with ring devices” is an unusually comprehensive patent for Apple. Rather than setting out the functions of one device or one technology, it is very much about a user’s whole array of devices.
It’s about the Apple ecosystem. And while there is a lot of detail in the patent, what it really does is make a persuasive case for how well an Apple Ring would fit into that.
Advertisement
The patent is credited to two inventors, including Stefan Hafeneger. His previous work for Apple includes multiple Apple Ring patents and patent applications, dating back to 2024.
Apple has been rumored to be working on a smart ring for much longer, though. One of the earliest reports dates back to 2007, when a concept “iRing” image was circulated, and it was expected it would control your iPod.
Trying to monitor a camera feed, cue the next track in a crowded booth or hear what is actually coming through the console is not the moment to discover that the ANC battery is dead or Bluetooth has decided to take the afternoon off. The Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO is built around that problem, using a compact closed back on-ear design, 22dBA of passive isolation, a 195 gram chassis and a locking cable that can connect to either earcup. It sells for $149 and should be just as useful on location as it is later that night when I want to hear the horns, strings and vocals on Dusty in Memphis without the room joining the performance.
The DT 275 PRO is available now through Beyerdynamic’s U.S. website and authorized retailers. It joins the DT 270 PRO but serves a different purpose: the DT 270 PRO is an over-ear model for recording, podcasting and indoor studio work, while the DT 275 PRO trades some long-session comfort for greater isolation, faster handling and a smaller footprint.
Built for Rooms That Have Abandoned Indoor Voices
Active noise cancellation works well on airplanes and commuter trains, but it can introduce processing, latency and another battery that inevitably dies during the part of the production nobody can repeat.
Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO
The DT 275 PRO takes the less fashionable approach of using closed earcups, leatherette pads and clamping pressure to reduce outside noise mechanically. Beyerdynamic specifies 22dBA of ambient-noise attenuation, which is the feature separating it from most compact studio headphones at this price.
The sound is tuned for clear speech, controlled bass and reliable signal assessment rather than a dramatic consumer presentation. Beyerdynamic specifies a frequency response of 5Hz to 24kHz, 45-ohm impedance, 105dB SPL at 1mW and total harmonic distortion below 0.04 percent.
Advertisement
The 45-ohm load should make the headphones practical with field recorders, cameras, audio interfaces, laptops and mobile devices without requiring a dedicated headphone amplifier. They can also produce substantial output, so protecting one’s hearing remains preferable to discovering the maximum level personally.
The Cable Goes Where You Need It
The detachable 1.5-meter cable can connect to either the left or right earcup and uses a locking bayonet mechanism to prevent an accidental disconnection. Beyerdynamic says the decoupled design also reduces cable and handling noise when the headphones are used with cameras, recorders and portable audio bags.
That sounds like a minor detail until a cable runs across the wrong side of a camera rig or escapes during a live take.
The earcups swivel for storage and single-ear monitoring, while the ear pads, headband pad and cable are replaceable. The connection cable is also compatible with Beyerdynamic’s DJ 300 PRO X and CLUB models.
Replaceable wear components should be mandatory on professional headphones. Throwing away an otherwise functional pair because the ear pads have absorbed five years of sweat is not innovation.
Advertisement
Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO Specifications
Design: Closed back, wired, on-ear
Driver type: Dynamic
Frequency response: 5Hz to 24kHz
Impedance: 45 ohms
Sensitivity: 105dB SPL at 1mW and 500Hz
Passive noise attenuation: 22dBA
Total harmonic distortion: Below 0.04 percent
Maximum short term power handling: 100mW
Cable: 1.5 meters, detachable and lockable
Cable connection: Left or right earcup
Connector: 3.5mm with 6.35mm adapter
Weight: 195 grams without cable
Replaceable parts: Ear pads, headband pad and cable
What Is Missing?
The DT 275 PRO does not include Bluetooth, ANC, a microphone or an inline remote. None belongs on a professional monitoring headphone built to avoid latency and electronic processing, but buyers looking for one pair to handle production work, commuting and phone calls should understand what is not included.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Unlike the DT 270 PRO, the product page does not list a USB-C audio adapter. The DT 275 PRO terminates in a conventional 3.5mm plug and includes a 6.35mm adapter, so owners of port-free smartphones and laptops will need a separate dongle.
The larger concern is comfort. The DT 275 PRO is light at 195 grams, but its on-ear design uses a fairly firm clamp to achieve that 22dBA of passive isolation. That should help keep outside noise where it belongs, although the pressure may become noticeable during a long production session. Isolation and all-day comfort rarely arrive holding hands.
The Competition
The Sennheiser HD 25 is the most direct rival. It also costs approximately $150, uses a closed on-ear design and has remained a fixture in DJ booths and broadcast bags for decades. It is lighter and already has an enormous replacement-parts ecosystem, while the DT 275 PRO counters with its dual-side locking cable, newer design and published 22dBA attenuation rating.
Advertisement
Sony MDR-7506
The Sony MDR-7506 currently sells for $113 and remains one of the most widely used production headphones ever made. Its over-ear design may prove more comfortable, but the fixed coiled cable is considerably less convenient for mobile work and Sony does not position it around the same level of passive isolation.
Audio-Technica’s ATH-M40x costs $109 and offers an over-ear fit, detachable cables and swiveling earcups. The ATH-M50x moves closer to the Beyerdynamic’s price at $159 and adds larger 45mm drivers and three supplied cables, but both occupy more room in a production bag.
Beyerdynamic’s own DT 270 PRO remains the obvious alternative for podcasting, music production and longer indoor sessions. It uses velour over-ear pads and weighs almost exactly the same, but offers lower passive isolation and a less compact wearing style.
Who Is It For?
The DT 275 PRO is intended for production crews, field recordists, broadcast engineers, livestream operators, front of house staff and DJs who need compact wired headphones with strong isolation and no wireless delay.
It should also appeal to commuters who value durability and passive isolation more than apps, firmware updates and hearing a synthetic voice announce that the battery is low.
Advertisement
Who Should Avoid It?
Home-studio users working in a quiet room will probably find the DT 270 PRO or DT 770 PRO X more comfortable over longer sessions.
Anyone who needs wireless connectivity, calls or active noise cancellation should also look elsewhere. The DT 275 PRO is a tool, not a lifestyle platform with a login screen.
Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO
The Bottom Line
The Beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO fills a specific gap between traditional studio headphones and DJ models. Its combination of 22dBA passive isolation, low weight, swiveling earcups, replaceable parts and a cable that locks into either side makes sense for people who monitor audio in environments where the environment refuses to cooperate.
Beyerdynamic’s advantage is that it has designed the DT 275 PRO around modern mobile-production workflows rather than asking another 35-year-old headphone to keep learning new tricks.
The CIA has never confirmed or denied the following story.
The only evidence we have that it happened at all is a 1997 article in Popular Science Vol. 250, Issue 1, where journalist Dawn Stover spoke to the mastermind behind one of the best-kept secrets of the Cold War.
We think of digital surveillance as a relatively modern fear. We worry that our phones are spying on us. That CCTV watches our every move. Even laptops have physical privacy covers to mitigate security risks. But it turns out, this goes back at least 60 years – right to the heart of the Soviet embassy in Washington DC.
Advertisement
Latest Videos FromTechRadar
The year is 1963. Kennedy still sits in the White House. Khrushchev holds the Kremlin. The Cuban Missile Crisis is still fresh in everyone’s mind. Paranoia runs high on both sides of the Iron Curtain.
And a repairman strolls unnoticed through the halls of a mansion in the capital. He steps into a busy administrative office used by Russian diplomats and the KGB. His bag of tools clunks with every swing. The man pauses at a large, boxy machine in the corner of the room. It hums and whirs.
The Mrs George Pullman House where the Soviet Union Embassy was located in 1963, pictured in 2010 (Image credit: Getty Images // Coast-to-Coast)
Launched just three years prior, the Xerox 914 was the company’s first successful photocopier – with a troubling tendency to catch on fire. But that’s not why the repairman is here today.
He drops his bag to the floor. The diplomats and KGB agents ignore him, the clerical staff barely see him, the hawkish security guards notice nothing out of the ordinary. The repairman diligently begins, as he always did, his routine maintenance work.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
When he’s finished the job, he slips away as quietly as he came. He leaves behind a single trace of his presence.
Advertisement
The repairman has just become one of the CIA’s best assets.
But the real story begins the year before in New York, at a disused bowling alley so anonymous you wouldn’t give it a single glance, let alone two. It’s far away from prying eyes.
Inside, Xerox’s head of government programs Donald Cary meets with four engineers. They’re not there to bowl. The Xerox men selected for the mission are Douglas Webb, Kent Hemphill, James Young, and thirty-six-year-old Ray Zoppoth, who knows the Xerox 914 inside out. He should do. He helped create the photocopier in the first place.
Advertisement
It’s exactly the expertise the CIA needs if the agency’s plan is to work.
Because the plan is to heist as many files as they can from the Soviet Union embassy, located within the Mrs. George Pullman House in downtown DC. With security so tight, not even a repairman, however inconspicuous, could hope to walk out unfrisked with stolen files stuffed down his pants.
So, the secret service has to get creative.
For days, the engineers discuss potential ways to capture images of the files being photocopied on the Xerox 914. Finally, Zoppoth hits upon an answer. Like all great ideas, it’s as maddeningly simple as it is cunning.
Advertisement
Mount a battery-powered home-movie camera with a zoom lens inside the copier. Aim the lens at the mirror used to reflect images onto the drum. And start taking pictures.
According to Stover’s piece, Zoppoth suggests the team “Mount a battery-powered home-movie camera with a zoom lens inside the copier. Aim the lens at the mirror used to reflect images onto the drum. Add a photocell that would prompt the camera to snap still frames whenever the photocopier lit up. And start taking pictures.”
Every time someone lays a document on the bed and presses ‘Copy’, the photocopier lights up, triggering the camera.
Easier said than done, but the Xerox engineers are excited by the breakthrough. They set to work installing a Bell & Howell 8mm movie camera inside a copier located in Xerox’s New York campus.
A vintage 8mm likely similar to one allegedly fitted inside the Xerox 914 (Image credit: Getty Images // Celine Lyneborg)
The noisy, bulky 914 is, it turns out, perfectly tailored to the role of spying device. It’s so impossibly large, it conceals the camera even when the maintenance panels are removed, and the operational sound as staff make copies masks the whir of the camera. No-one has any idea they’re being covertly watched.
Advertisement
The test run proves a success. Ray Zoppoth and the rest of the research team can see everything passing through the photocopier. “When we developed the pictures, we found recipes and copies of music and cartoons and jokes and all kinds of things,” he later tells Popular Science.
Weeks later, Ray Zoppoth finds himself deep inside a building used by the CIA. He’s led into a basement room allegedly code-named ‘Disneyland East’. Zoppoth shows the spooks the Xerox invention. He teaches them how to fit the camera inside the 914. They, in turn, train the embassy’s regular repairman to install the camera and extract the film each time he returns.
Then, one day, in 1963, a familiar face arrives at the Soviet Embassy to carry out routine maintenance work. He holds a bag containing tools and, in its depths, an innocent 8mm home-movie camera. He’s waved through the gates without a thought.
The rest is history.
Advertisement
With lips tightly sealed and files classified, we’ll never know what was learned. The Cold War dragged on for another 27 long years.
But shortly after the project ended, Zoppoth confessed that the secret service again tapped up Xerox. This time, they want cameras hidden inside the more streamlined Xerox 813 desktop photocopier, used by ministries, agencies, and diplomatic offices around the world.
If the story is true – and only Zoppoth admitted it, with his colleague confirming but refusing to go on record – it suggests the joint operation was a success.
It remains a reminder that even the unsexiest machine in the office can be a security risk.
You’d think getting wrong advice would make you more cautious. New research says the opposite happens when that advice comes from AI. A study led by Valerio Capraro, a psychology professor at the University of Milan-Bicocca, found that incorrect AI advice made people less accurate, yet noticeably more confident in their answers (via IBM Think).
The study also found that people who received incorrect AI advice became far less willing to admit they didn’t know an answer, even when staying silent was an option, and they were rewarded for accuracy.
Why does wrong AI advice make people so sure of themselves?
Representative Image (AI-generated)
Researchers asked participants six questions about obscure movie details, deliberately picking ones the AI model consistently answered incorrectly. This let them isolate what happens when people consult AI, regardless of whether its advice is actually good.
The results were striking. Without AI, participants declined to answer roughly 36 to 44% of the time across two experiments. With AI available, that dropped to just 3 to 6%. Accuracy fell too, from 27.5 percent correct when working alone to just 9.2 percent with AI involved.
Capraro suspects AI may lower the amount of confidence people need before committing to an answer, essentially shifting how they judge their own certainty. Oddly, this held true even when AI advice appeared automatically without being requested, suggesting the effect isn’t just about actively seeking help.
Advertisement
Sensor Tower
Does raising the stakes change anything?
Adding financial rewards and penalties made people somewhat more cautious and accurate, though the underlying pattern never fully disappeared. Capraro draws a clear distinction here. AI should augment human judgment, not replace it entirely.
If you are working or aim to work in the research and development field, then consider undertaking an online course to boost your skills.
Whether you are an industry veteran, a newbie, or somewhere in the middle, the industry you are in is likely changing as fast as you can keep up with. That is certainly true of the research and development sector, where innovation and transformation are par for the course.
As a result, it is an absolute necessity that professionals, regardless of which stage of their career they are in, stay aware of the skills, techniques and processes making waves in the sector. If you want your career to evolve in step with the space itself, then make use of every educational opportunity that comes your way – starting with some free and inexpensive online courses.
Coursera
For students or professionals looking to better develop an understanding of research methodologies, Coursera, via the Queen Mary University of London, is running the Research Methodologies programme.
Advertisement
This flexible 20-hour course consists of four modules in which participants will study different research methodologies, different sampling approaches, and primary and secondary data collection approaches. Students will also look at the role of the internet in market research as well as non-comparative scaling techniques and the course will end with a discussion on different data collection approaches, observation, content analysis, narrative research, phenomenology and the collection of data using ethnography.
A similar course suited to those looking to develop foundational skills is the Coursera/University of London programme titled Understanding Research Methods. This flexible, six-hour course has four core modules and is particularly suited to those conducting research as part of their postgraduate studies or who are looking to build their knowledge base. No prior knowledge or experience in research is required.
Alison
Alison and NPTEL are running the Understanding Research Methods and Approaches programme which involves exploring qualitative research methods, fieldwork and literature reviews among other topics. The free online course offers a general introduction to understanding different research methodologies and various approaches. Students will learn the significance of linking the gap between theory and practice. The advanced level course takes around five to six hours, includes three modules and is CPD accredited.
If you want a more specific education, Alison and NPTEL have additional courses such as a beginner level Introduction to Biomedical Research programme, an Academic and Research Skills for Business Success course and a Research Skills for Healthcare programme.
Advertisement
Oxford Home Study Centre
The Oxford Home Study Centre is running a free Research Skills training course designed to teach students how to conduct effective research and make efficient use of their time.
The course is flexible, takes around 20 hours to complete and comes with a certificate upon completion. This course delves into the fundamental elements and benefits of research capabilities and will focus on why research skills are important, tips and tricks for reading and note-taking techniques, and how to utilise Miller’s Law, which is a proposed memory retention rule that the average person can only keep seven (plus or minus two) items in their working memory at any given time.
It is ideal for an individual looking to boost the skills that empower research in the long-term, at a core level.
Class Central
Class Central, via Yale University, is running a Fundamentals of Qualitative Research Methods programme.
Advertisement
The course, which is a Yale University programme accessed for free through YouTube, is a self-paced video course that takes under an hour and a half to finish. Students will learn the fundamentals of qualitative research methods, develop a qualitative research question and gather data using interviews and focus groups.
Class Central, via various other edtech platforms, also offers research programmes such as the Understanding Clinical Research: Behind the Statistics module, Research Ethics and Plagiarism course, and Research Skills, Communication and Dissemination.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Ukraine approves indigenous turbojet-powered guided bombs for frontline combat operations
Domestic guided bombs now strike military objectives up to 200 kilometers away
Seven Ukrainian manufacturers now build guided bomb conversion systems domestically
Ukraine has officially approved several domestically built guided aerial bombs for combat use, including turbojet-powered versions capable of striking objectives up to 200 kilometers (125 miles) away.
Brig. Gen. Andrii Lebedenko, deputy commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, said several of these designs have already seen use on the battlefield, while others remain in testing.
“We already have systems that use more than just gliding. They now carry turbojet engines to increase their employment range to between 100 and 200 kilometers,” said Lebedenko.
Latest Videos FromTechRadar
Advertisement
Ukraine expands the reach of indigenous guided bombs
The program began in 2024 as an effort to convert older unguided aerial bombs into precision-guided weapons after Ukraine lacked domestic manufacturers capable of producing such systems.
Ukrainian officials now say the country has seven manufacturers producing guided bomb systems, compared with none when the initiative was first introduced.
“This task was set in 2024. We did not have any such manufacturers in the country. Now there are already seven. They already know how to do it,” said Lebedenko.
He also confirmed that Ukraine already operates aircraft capable of launching domestically produced weapons, while expanding manufacturing capacity has become the next priority for the defense industry.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
According to Ukrainian officials, the program has also created a growing community of engineers capable of designing glide kits and propulsion systems for increasingly sophisticated aerial munitions.
Advertisement
“Moreover, a school of specialists and engineers has emerged who know how to create gliding systems. They know how to make them with engines,” said Lebedenko.
Some of the latest variants are no longer limited to gliding after release because turbojet engines continue powering the bombs toward military objectives at greater stand-off distances.
Alongside upgrading older munitions, Ukraine has also developed entirely indigenous guided aerial bombs, expanding its domestic precision strike capability.
Ukraine’s Brave1 defense innovation platform announced the country’s first indigenous guided aerial bomb after approximately 17 months of development.
The weapon carries a 250-kilogram warhead designed to strike fortified positions, command centers, and other military objectives located dozens of kilometers away.
Developers have described the weapon as a completely original Ukrainian design rather than an adaptation of an existing foreign guided bomb.
Advertisement
Ukrainian military officials have also indicated that improving strike accuracy remains more important than producing larger numbers of guided bombs for operational use.
“We are looking toward precision so that we can effectively destroy enemy command posts, drone control centers, infrastructure, and other targets,” said Lebedenko.
Ukraine has also disclosed expanding manufacturing capacity, growing engineering expertise, and longer operational reach for its guided bomb program.
However, independent verification of battlefield performance remains limited because operational details surrounding combat employment have not been publicly released.
The Amazfit T-Rex 2 Ultra is a well-stocked smartwatch for adventurers – you just need to be willing to handle its hulking watch frame.
Plenty of battery life
High-end watch features at a more affordable price
A useful LED flashlight
It’s a big watch to wear
Smartwatch ecosystem lags behind competition
GPS and heart rate tracking not best in class
Key Features
Advertisement
Review Price:
£549
Built-in LED flashlight
Advertisement
Integrated white and green LED modes offer high visibility for nighttime outdoor activities.
Dual-band GPS tracking
Advertisement
Dual-band GPS technology delivers strong distance and pace tracking accuracy during outdoor workouts.
Long-lasting battery life
Advertisement
An 870mAh battery provides up to 30 days of typical use and up to 10 days with always-on display.
Introduction
The Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2 is a smartwatch built for outdoor lovers who don’t want to spend the big bucks on a new Garmin Fenix 8, Garmin Instinct 3 or Apple Watch Ultra 3.
The Android and iOS-friendly outdoor smartwatch offers many of the same features you’ll find on those more premium options. That includes offline colour maps, turn-by-turn navigation, and sports modes aplenty, all packaged up in a watch design that’s built to operate in extreme environments.
Advertisement
When you’re not heading off for a multi-day hike, the Ultra 2 will let you pay your way, make calls over Bluetooth and let you load up music to keep you company on your off-road outings.
With the arrival of the Ultra, Zepp Health has now grown its T-Rex series to three watches. This sits at the top of that pile, but is it the one you should go for and is this one of the best outdoor smartwatches? I’ve been wearing it for a few weeks to find that out.
Advertisement
Design and screen
Now larger case size
Larger AMOLED display
Comes in one colour
If we’re comparing the Ultra 2 to the last Ultra and the T-Rex 3 Pro, this is a considerably larger watch to live with. You now have a 51mm case that measures in at 14.3mm thick.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
It’s inevitably going to get compared to Garmin’s 51mm Fenix 8 model, which is thinner, though opting for a titanium bezel and buttons helps to ensure it’s not super heavy to wear. At just shy of 90g, it actually sits at around the same weight as Garmin’s 51mm Fenix. You can find lighter, smaller and still rugged watches, including in Zepp Health’s own Amazfit line.
It’s a watch dominated by its titanium bezel that surrounds a now larger 1.5-inch, 480 x 480 resolution AMOLED touchscreen. That’s a screen that can achieve a maximum brightness of 3,000 nits. I did find that in some brighter outdoor light, it can still be challenging to view the screen at some angles. The screen visibility and overall quality are good, but I think you’ll find better screens on rival watches.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The strap attached to that big polymer case is unsurprisingly a pretty robust silicone one. At 26mm, it’s a sizable strap to whip on. The traditional watch clasp ensures it stays securely in place at all times, with a clippable design that makes it very easy to swap the strap out for a new one.
The visible screws are your indicator that Zepp Health has designed this watch to operate in extreme environments. Whether it’s the ability to handle recreational dives up to 45 metres or offer military-grade resistance to extreme heat and cold temperatures, this is a watch truly built for some serious rough and tumble.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
There is room on that case exterior for an LED flashlight, which has become an on-trend feature for outdoor watches. This one shines nice and bright, making it a worthy addition. There are both white and green LED light modes along with a boost mode, when you need a bump in visibility.
Performance and software
ZeppOS supports Android and iOS
Zepp Pay, App Store and free offline maps
Bluetooth calls supported
Advertisement
Zepp Health keeps the software all in-house. So the Ultra 2, like other Amazfit smartwatches, runs on ZeppOS, which is available for both Android and iOS users. The experience of using it across the two platforms is largely the same, bar a few missing features on either side. iPhone users can control their phone camera remotely, while Android users have the added ability to send quick replies to messages.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The big addition from the first Ultra is the built-in microphone and speaker. This allows you to handle calls, hear turn-by-turn directions during navigation mode, and it also brings the voice memo feature into play. The speaker goes pretty loud, if not the clearest when using it for calls.
It can also be used with Zepp Flow, which means you can speak to the watch to ask about your fitness stats, switch on the do not disturb mode or just set a timer. While it is not as sophisticated a voice assistant as Google’s Gemini or Apple’s Siri, it works well enough to give you an alternative way to interact with the watch.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
In terms of core features like viewing notifications, using music controls and loading audio, making contactless payments, and generally getting around on the watch, everything works well enough. If you’re looking for a watch you can download apps and watch faces, you can do that here – just don’t expect a storefront that matches the likes of Google Play in Wear OS in terms of variety and the number of available apps and watch faces.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
ZeppOS still lags a little behind the likes of Garmin, Apple, and Wear OS watches when it comes to offering a polished smartwatch ecosystem. It doesn’t necessarily shortchange you in features; it just doesn’t quite match up to the competition.
Tracking and features
Over 180 sports modes
Works with Strava, Komoot and TrainingPeaks
Promises pre-loaded maps and automatic re-routing
Whether you run, swim, bike, stay indoors or love Hyrox-style workouts, the Ultra 2 pretty much has you covered. This is a watch that can also track your daily step counts, monitor sleep time or continuously track heart rate. Those are likely not the main reasons you’re going to be looking at it, though.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
You’re probably going to be sizing it up because of its abilities to accurately track your movements outside, offer maps you can view and follow on the watch and be able to quickly know when you’re about to hit higher-altitude terrain.
Advertisement
I’ll start with tracking accuracy: you get dual-band GPS, giving you the latest GPS technology available in smartwatches. Though as I’ve found, not all dual-band GPS watches deliver the same results.
I’d say the T-Rex Ultra 2 delivers very strong GPS accuracy. The likes of Garmin, Apple and Suunto just shade it overall for the best showcase of dual-band, but for distance tracking and metrics like average pace, I was happy with what the Ultra 2 served up.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
For mapping and navigation support, there is the promise of preloaded maps, but I ended up having to sync them over from the Zepp phone app as I’ve done with other map-supporting Amazfit smartwatches.
Depending on how big the location or region you want to sync is, it can take anywhere from 20-30 minutes to transfer maps to the watch. Even with the option of doing that over Wi-Fi, I found things a bit slow going.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
When the maps are loaded, you can use a mixture of the touchscreen and physical buttons to zoom and move around maps, pick from two different map viewing styles and make use of the onboard navigation features.
You can upload a route to follow, explore nearby spots like coffee shops and create routes directly on the watch. Maps are nicely detailed and easy to view, and the navigation features work well to steer you in the right direction if you veer off course.
If you’re looking for a more traditional sports watch experience, the Ultra 2 can give you that as well. I’ve used it for a range of indoor workouts including pool swims and the tracking in general has been very good.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Heart rate tracking accuracy is a mixed bag – though I do typically find this is the case with bigger watches. Given the size of the Ultra 2, I do think that contributes to some of the inaccurate readings I’ve seen during more high-intensity workouts. You can pair external heart rate monitors over Bluetooth, as well as various cycling sensors, if you want a more accurate read on your data.
The training features and training insights available are a work in progress for Zepp Health. You can better understand your training volume, see recommended recovery times, and set up interval training sessions, with the watch capable of automatically recognising a range of strength training movements. While these features are well-built and the insights do feel mostly reliable, the presentation needs a bit of work.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
It’s good to see that you can link it to the likes of Strava, Runkeeper, Apple Health and Google Fit, which means you can pull in workout and training data from other sources if you’re not just a one-device person.
Up to 30 days battery life
Up to 10 days with always-on display mode
50-177 hours GPS battery life
The T-Rex Ultra 2 is built to be on your wrist for big adventures, which means it needs to deliver big battery life.
There’s an 870mAh capacity battery inside of its hulking 51mm frame that can max out to a month with what Zepp Health deems typical use. That’s basically when you’re not regularly using GPS, the flashlight or using the most accurate continuous health monitoring support.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
When you start to add some of those features into the mix, those numbers drop. That said, it’s still designed to be a watch that can last over a week – even with the screen on at all times.
Advertisement
I found the battery life in general to be very good. On some heavier usage days, the battery drop was around 10%. Overnight, the drop can be as little as 2%. I never felt there was a noticeable battery drain. When you keep the screen on at all times, you can get up to 10 days of battery, depending on whether you’re using those more power-hungry features.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
When you’re using the GPS, battery numbers range from 50 hours with its most accurate GPS mode to up to 177 hours with the GPS max battery life mode. In most cases, you’ll have to sacrifice the most accurate GPS tracking; I found that an hour of tracking in the most accurate GPS mode dropped the battery by around 5%. That doesn’t equate to the 50 hours promised.
If you compare those GPS battery numbers to the pricier 51mm Fenix 8 Pro, Garmin’s watch can go anywhere from 21 hours to 24 days. So it’s not quite the mammoth numbers promised by the watch it’s clearly trying to emulate.
Advertisement
Should you buy it?
Advertisement
You want an outdoor-friendly smartwatch that’s cheaper than the competition
While an expensive smartwatch, the T-Rex 2 Ultra does undercut the competition while offering a solid all-round performance.
Advertisement
You want the best-value Amazfit outdoor smartwatch
The Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro is smaller and offers a lot of the same features as the T-Rex 2 Ultra for considerably less money.
Advertisement
Final Thoughts
If the plan for the Amazfit was to offer a good, cut-price alternative to Garmin’s largest Fenix 8 model and similarly priced Garmin Instinct 3, then I think the T-Rex Ultra 2 mostly achieves that.
It’s got a rugged design, a bucketload of outdoor features and can deliver the kind of battery life that means it can last for weeks. The problem is that the T-Rex 3 Pro exists and that’s not far off offering the same qualities for less money.
Really, the Pro model feels like the smarter buy unless you really value a bigger display, a bit more battery and that pretty handy flashlight.
Advertisement
How We Test
We thoroughly test every smartwatch we review. We use industry-standard testing to compare features properly, and we use the watch as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.
Worn as our main smartwatch during the testing period
Health data compared against other wearables
FAQs
What are the main differences between the T-Rex Ultra 2 and the T-Rex Pro 3?
The T-Rex Ultra 2 includes a larger 51mm case, more battery life, a built-in flashlight, and more onboard storage than the T-Rex Pro 3.
Apple is presenting John Ternus as the steady continuation of Tim Cook‘s leadership, with the incoming CEO praising the company’s momentum while declining to reveal how he intends to reshape it.
Cook and Ternus appeared together July 27 at the Los Angeles premiere of the Apple TV series Ted Lasso, giving Apple an unusually public setting to present its approaching leadership handoff.
The event was Cook’s final Apple TV premiere as CEO and Ternus’ first since Apple named him as Cook’s successor. Both executives arrived in navy suits, open-collar white shirts and “Believe” pins, reinforcing the image of continuity.
Cook offered an emphatic endorsement of the executive who will replace him on September 1, 2026.
Advertisement
Cook called Ternus “the perfect person for this role.”. Ternus described the promotion as an extraordinary opportunity after 25 years at Apple.
“It’s amazing,” he said. “I’ve been at Apple for 25 years, I love Apple, and to have this opportunity is beyond words.”
Ternus isn’t showing his hand
Ternus offered few details when asked how he might change Apple TV after becoming CEO.
“I am just so excited about the momentum we have,” Ternus said. “There’s so much great content on Apple TV, and now is just the perfect time for us to keep the momentum up, keep bringing in incredible storytellers and creative folks to keep making it better.”
Advertisement
Asked whether he had begun discussing his own plans for Apple TV with services chief Eddy Cue, Ternus said, “I think it’s pretty amazing right now.”
He declined to discuss whether Apple should release more films in theaters, bringing his answer back to the Ted Lasso premiere instead. When asked what he planned to do first on September 1, Ternus was equally guarded.
“You have to wait and see,” he said.
The answers don’t reveal whether Ternus plans substantial changes to Apple TV. They do show that Apple isn’t using the transition to promise an immediate strategic reset.
Advertisement
Apple is selling continuity, not reinvention
Apple announced the succession plan on April 20, 2026. Ternus will take control of Apple’s daily operations, while Cook will become executive chairman and assist with certain matters, including engagement with policymakers around the world.
The cast and Apple executives attend the Ted Lasso Season 4 premiere at the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures in Los Angeles on July 27, 2026. Image credit: Getty Images
Cook said at the premiere that the transition had gone exceptionally well for Apple’s employees and investors.
“It’s over the top great,” Cook said. “John is the perfect person for this role, and the whole thing has just been great.”
Cook previously told employees that he selected the timing because Apple had a strong business, an ambitious product roadmap and a successor ready to take charge. He also said he planned to remain executive chairman for a long time and serve as a sounding board for Ternus.
The arrangement puts Ternus in charge while keeping Cook involved as an adviser and executive chairman. Their appearance at the premiere reinforced Apple’s message that the transition is about continuity rather than an urgent change in direction.
Advertisement
Ternus isn’t an outsider hired to overturn Cook’s strategy. He joined Apple in 2001 and became senior vice president of Hardware Engineering in 2021 after working on products including the Mac, iPad and iPhone.
He also became the executive sponsor for Apple’s design organization at the end of 2025, giving him a wider role across hardware and software design before Apple announced his promotion. Ternus later told employees that Apple would continue focusing on design because it remained central to the company’s work.
Those responsibilities could influence where Ternus places his attention as CEO, but they don’t point to an immediate break with Cook. Apple’s products and strategies develop over several years, so releases during the opening stretch of Ternus’ tenure will largely reflect work completed before he took charge.
No individual executive can quickly redirect a company with Apple’s size, organizational structure and long development cycles.
Advertisement
Ternus may eventually put a distinct mark on Apple, particularly through the design and hardware organizations he already knows. His first public appearance beside Cook as the incoming CEO instead showed that Apple wants the transition to look steady, familiar and deliberately uneventful.
An AI revolution is sweeping through the IT storage world, providing a massively beneficial environment requiring more data to be stored and delivered to AI models and agents, more data to be protected, more data access governance and much better storage operating environments. The downside is that AI can run amok, with data mishaps and deliberate agent-enhanced attacks. We are using AI to make things better and need AI to prevent AI itself from making things worse. Forty-four months ago, when ChatGPT was released, the storage world began an irreversible migration into the AI era. The technology developments needed to provide fast data access to the favorite AI processor, the GPU, revolutionized the NAND and SSD suppliers, the flash array hardware and software vendors and the HPC/supercomputing world. The old and relatively steady, pre-ChatGPT era Dell, HPE, and NetApp-dominated enterprise storage array business met a set of new vendors growing fast, coming from the all-flash array and HPC worlds. Vendors such as DDN, Pure Storage, VAST Data, and WEKA grew rapidly as parallel data access became a key software technology, alongside disaggregated storage array designs, increased use of unstructured data, the rapid growth of analytics, and the emergence of AI-focused data lakes such as Databricks and Snowflake. A whole new public cloud sector emerged: the GPU-as-a-Service neoclouds, such as CoreWeave and Lambda. AI training dominated the early AI storage days but is now being overtaken by AI inference; production AI, with enterprises deploying AI factories to build, tune, deploy, and run their own and third-party AI agents. Model Context Protocol (MCP) and graph technology enable digital employees to act and reason, access and change data, both structured and unstructured. They can make mistakes, meaning that their activities have to be recorded so that they can be reversed if they take a wrong track. These digital employees have to be governed with Agent Identity Access Management. Stepping back for a moment, we can see storage and AI meet in five places: Storage providing data for AI Protecting AI data and actions Storage cyber-resilience extended to govern AI data access Storage using AI in its own operations Storage being protected from AI-driven attacks. Data for AI The dominant GPU vendor, Nvidia, has eagerly supported storage delivery technologies to keep its GPUs running and not being IO-bound. Feeding them data from parallel file systems using disk drive arrays was not good enough. The disks were replaced by SSDs, with NVMe and PCIe interconnects replacing the disk drive era’s SAS and SATA protocols. The transfer of data from a storage array’s x86 controller and its DRAM to the GPU server’s CPU+DRAM subsystem and then to the GPU’s capacity-limited high-bandwidth memory (HBM) was too slow. GPUDirect cut out the storage array controller and its memory from the data flow, with RDMA access from the SSDs. This was applied to files first and then to objects with S3 over RDMA-type technologies. Cloudian, MinIO and Scality have been active here. KV caching schemes have been set up to logically extend a GPU’s HBM to SSDs, reduce HBM data load waits and avoid token recomputation. Nvidia has partnered with the main enterprise storage array vendors to make this happen. Disaggregated storage array (DASE) technology, pioneered by VAST Data, has been adopted by Dell, Everpure, HPE and NetApp. Monolithic, high-end storage arrays from Hitachi Vantara, IBM, and Lenovo-acquired Infinidat have not adopted DASE, nor GPUDirect and not KV caching. Their architecture precludes them from joining in and they are becoming the storage equivalent of mainframes, a left-behind but still necessary niche. AI models process tokens, which are turned into vector embedding data that needs storing and searching. Dedicated vector database suppliers have sprung up, such as Pinecone, Qdrant, Weaviate, and Zilliz, while multi-model OLAP and OLTP databases have added vector support, SingleStore being an example. AI data pipeline technologies are being developed to enable an organization’s entire data estate to be used as an AI data source, but without copying it to a single repository. Apache Iceberg is being used to give data lakes access to external storage and logically bring it into the data lake’s namespace. The monolithic arrays are, of course, data sources for AI pipelines and will contribute. Data management suppliers doubled down on initiatives to map organizations’ data and make it available, via classification, selection, filtering and metadata access so as to protect privileged data, reduce bulk data movements, and accelerate targeted data movement; think Arcitecta, Datadobi, Hammerspace and Komprise. An advantage of DASE array architecture is that storage is decoupled from compute, and the compute can be scaled up to run AI technologies directly on the array. This means that array vendors’ software stacks can be extended upwards into AI data pipelines. They can have the capability to provide services for AI agents and become, in effect, AI operating systems. Indeed VAST Data explicitly calls its extended SW stack its AIOS. Protecting AI data and actions Backup and cyber-resilience vendors, such as Cohesity, Commvault, Druva, Rubrik, and Veeam, have recognized that their backups represent a great data source for AI models and agents. They developed internal AI agents, such as Cohesity’s Gaia, its Gen AI search assistant, to build on this idea. The backup vendors see that their backups contain a temporal record of data changes but they, the changes, have been made by different entities in an organization’s IT estate and are not correlated. AI agents can monitor the backups and find links between events that indicate an existing or developing cyber attack. They can identify the start of an attack, the affected data, the last known good copy of that data, and restore it, helping with cyber-attack response and recovery. Cohesity, Rubrik, and others are promoting cyber-attack simulations where they do this with customer execs and even board members to show them how a cyber-attack needs a cross-business organization response to be effective. Their ability to feed AI data pipelines is growing. AI can be used to search for data relevant to an upstream enquiry, detect and filter out or mask PII data, and then move it to the requesting target. Veeam is going further and starting to combine production data with its backup data for AI purposes. AI cyber resilience The main backup vendors have all become cyber-resilience suppliers and provide some form of identity access management (IAM) plus related data access monitoring. IAM has been a human-centered activity but is rapidly embracing AI agent data and resource access as well. Consider an AI agent to be a digital employee and the need for agent-focused IAM becomes immediately obvious. Then realize that your digital employees operate inside your IT systems and not outside. Unlike human employees, they operate inside IT systems rather than sitting at a keyboard typing commands or clicking GUI buttons. It gets worse. As well as operating at speeds much, much faster than human employees, organizations will likely have thousands, even tens of thousands of, agents, so the likelihood of accidental data mishaps will be many times higher, and the mishap can take place in seconds. The only way to provide agentic IAM would appear to be to use agents. Cohesity, Druva, HYCU, Rubrik and Veeam are active in this space; using AI agents to provide governance for AI agents. We are also seeing the rise of agent activity recording, with storage of temporary files, so that misplaced agent activity, either accidental or deliberate, can be identified and fixed. This is a fast-developing field and the risks and dangers are still being identified. AI enhancing storage internal operations We have seen storage array vendors using machine learning to monitor array telemetry and identify faults for some time. HPE-acquired Nimble was one of the first vendors to do this and it is now commonplace. Modern AI can do more. Storage and data protection admin can be highly complex. One example is a Veeam upgrade issue. An obvious use of AI chatbots is to have them be the interface between an administrator, using natural language, and the data protection software. The chatbot, or agent, is trained on the data protection software’s features and telemetry and can function as a highly-skilled diagnostic engineer helping admin staff. This, we think, will spread like wildfire, as it will effectively up-skill admin staff. They can operate at a higher level, diagnosing data protection gaps, adding new applications to be protected or applications to be given data access, without having to go down into the weeds and set up each individual action according to policies in a manual. In effect, admin staff can “talk” to their data or arrays, manage a fleet of arrays, institute new policies, optimize operations to balance performance, cost and electricity usage more effectively by using AI. We are going to see AI user interfaces being developed, complementing the existing CLIs and GUIs. The big issue AI agents are intangible, invisible and make decisions at microsecond speeds. We human operators are tangible, visible and make decisions slowly. It’s easy for computers to monitor us but it’s darn near impossible for us to monitor agents. We will have to use agents to monitor agents, and that means we have to trust our monitoring agents, really trust them. They have to be immutable, immune to having their identities stolen, and capable of detecting and stopping rogue agents in their tracks. Imagine a North Korea cyber-hacking group developing their own swarm of attack agents. We need to be ready for this. The wolves will be coming. ®
At first glance, the new Apple Upgrade program seems like a no-brainer. Why pay the full $1,199 for a new iPad Pro when you could spread the cost by leasing it for 24 or 36 months with no interest or additional fees? A 24-month iPad Pro 256GB lease will run you $32 a month for a total of $768. After that, you could pay the remaining cost or swap the iPad Pro for a newer model.
In a time of ever-increasing gadget prices, including Apple’s, a new upgrade program with low monthly fees seems like a win for shoppers. But of course, as with anything involving credit, there are downsides to consider.
For one, this is a lease program, so you don’t actually own the device you’re paying for. I suppose that’s not functionally different than paying off something with credit, but it introduces new problems when the lease is over. According to Apple’s FAQ, “You must return your device in good working condition at the end of your lease term.” If you want to return or trade in your device, you may have to pay damage fees, depending on its condition. Apple says you can also pay for AppleCare protection to avoid a damage fee (unfortunately, it’s not bundled with the new upgrade program, as it was with the iPhone upgrade plan).
If you get tired of paying monthly fees, you could just buy out the rest of your lease. But if you wanted to end the lease entirely, you’ll also have to pay “substantial” fees, according to Apple. The company says upgrading early (before the 12-, 24- or 36-month period you signed up for) can also incur “substantial” fees, depending on how many months are left on your lease. If you don’t pay off the lease at the end of the term (or trade in for a new device), you’ll also automatically be moved to monthly payments for up to six months. Apple also warns “your monthly payments may increase” in those additional months.
Advertisement
Unlike the iPhone Upgrade program, your lease and monthly fees for the Apple Upgrade program are handled by Klarna, a “buy now, pay later” company. Apple already offers Klarna as a payment option in Apple Pay, so this isn’t exactly a new partnership. But as with anything involving credit, Klarna could be considered predatory. Its ideal customers are young people who don’t have the best credit. They’re also the most vulnerable when it comes to dealing with extra fees and defaults.
All of that being said, if you can comfortably pay the Apple Upgrade program’s monthly fees, it’s a smart way to snap up new devices. It’s easier than applying for an Apple Card, and it’s cheaper than the 0 percent APR payments that card offers for Apple hardware. And I’ll have to admit, that $32 a month iPad Pro sure sounds tempting… but I’m going to figure out my plan for the end of that lease before I sign up.
Ozlo, the sleep earbuds startup from former Bose engineers, is launching its next device. On Tuesday, the company unveiled Sleepbuds 2, an updated version of its original product that tackles key areas of improvement, including battery life, connectivity, and sound quality. The new model costs $279, a 12% increase from its predecessor.
The launch marks Ozlo’s first major update since the release of its original device and reflects the company’s evolution from a continuation of Bose’s brand into its own sleep platform.
Image Credits:Ozlo
The original Sleepbuds, launched in late 2024, were meant to fill the hole left by Bose’s departure from the category the year prior. Ozlo’s co-founders, N.B. Patil, Brian Mulcahey, and Charlie Taylor, were Bose veterans who had been deeply involved with the Sleepbuds program and saw the potential to continue the business. They acquired and licensed the Sleepbuds research and IP for their new company, Ozlo, making its first product essentially a continuation of Bose’s earlier efforts.
The initial earbuds, which now have more than 200,000 customers, were smaller and more low-profile than AirPods. This made them more comfortable to wear at night, especially for side sleepers. They also offered built-in sleep sounds, Bluetooth streaming, passive noise blocking, an in-ear alarm, sleep tracking, and other features.
The Sleepbuds 2 promise a range of improvements, including, most notably, 14 hours of battery life instead of roughly 10 hours. Plus, the charging case can now store enough power for two to three nights of use per charge and adds a button that lets users play a sleep sound or snooze the alarm without reaching for their phone.
Advertisement
Image Credits:Ozlo
The update also tackles one of customers’ biggest complaints: Bluetooth connectivity, which could be flaky, although software updates improved it over time. Ozlo claims the Sleepbuds 2 offer longer Bluetooth range, a more reliable connection, and dedicated pairing controls for faster setup. The improvements come from a redesigned antenna and extender, Ozlo said.
The audio system has also been updated with a built-in amplifier for better sound masking and improved sound quality. Personalized sound tuning is new, too, optimizing audio for specific use cases such as Spoken Word, Airplane mode, and Focus mode, in addition to a Balanced mode.
Image Credits:Ozlo
Another new feature is a Sleep Shield, which will block incoming calls, alerts, notifications, and Bluetooth audio streaming. This works if the users hasn’t already enable their phone’s built-in sleep focus mode.
Ozlo’s sleep insights have expanded to include more details around sleep patterns. The biometrics in the buds monitor breathing and movement, while the case monitors room conditions, such as the sound levels, light, and temperature. This can help wearers learn which sleep environments lead to deeper, more restorative sleep, helping them improve their sleep over time.
The company outlined its plans to become a broader platform for sleep data during an interview with TechCrunch at the Consumer Electronics Show in January, including plans to use AI for better interpret users’ sleep patterns. It is also developing an AI “sleep buddy” that would allow users to chat with about their sleep data.
To kick off the launch, Ozlo is offering a sleep mask and travel case with each purchase for a limited time. The $279 Sleepbuds 2 also ship with four pairs of silicone ear tips in different sizes, the charging case, and a USB-C cable.
Advertisement
As an aside, I purchased my own Ozlo Sleepbuds after reading initial reviews of the product and found them to be an effective tool for blocking out noise and streaming sounds and music, and far more comfortable than sleeping in my AirPods. They never fell out overnight, either.
However, I found that I prefer streaming from the Calm app instead of using Ozlo’s built-in sounds. (Apparently, i’m not alone: Ozlo and Calm partnered on a co-branded case last year that included a year’s subscription to Calm’s library of sleep sounds, stories, and other sleep experiences.)
I’m looking forward to trying the new Sleepbuds 2 to see if they’re worth the upgrade for an existing Sleepbuds owner like me.
Advertisement
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
![XRP Holders Will Become the New 1%! Elon Musk's 2036 Prediction Will Shock You! [DON'T MISS THIS]](https://wordupnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/1785270007_maxresdefault-80x80.jpg)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login