An e-reader and tablet hybrid that solves a couple of issues of Kindles and their contemporaries, while introducing a few issues of its own.
Far better motion than E Ink ereaders
Can run (almost) any Android app
Neat anti-reflective glass screen
Low-contrast display
Fairly weak processor
Relatively low screen resolution
Key Features
Introduction
The Hannspree Lumo is a different kind of reader. At a glance, it looks like a larger Amazon Kindle Colorsoft, but it uses entirely different screen technology.
Advertisement
Instead of E Ink, found in most conventional readers, the Hannspree Lumo uses a kind of LCD with some of E Ink’s properties. It uses a front light rather than an intense backlight, so it’s easier on your eyes, and since it doesn’t have a clunky “flash” screen refresh, it handles motion well too.
Best of all worlds? Not quite, as there are significant compromises too. Sharpness and contrast are actually significantly worse than a Kindle’s — or a rival Boox or Kobo reader — which has a real impact on the good old reading experience.
Advertisement
As such, it’s best to think of this as an unusual tablet-reader hybrid. It limits the Hannspree Lumo’s appeal, but certainly doesn’t get rid of it entirely.
Advertisement
Design
Matte glass screen
Aluminium body
Included case
The Hannspree Lumo is larger than most ereaders, and uses somewhat more upmarket materials than plenty of them too. This is a 7.8-inch screen device, making it potentially a better fit for graphic novels than a Kindle Paperwhite or Colorsoft.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
It also has a metal casing and a glass screen. The vast majority of ereaders have plastic bodies and plastic screens — the old Kindle Voyage is an outlier here, as it had a lovely etched-glass display. But presumably that was a bit too costly, as it was certainly more scratch-resistant than plastic.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
As such, the Hannspree Lumo can come across as much like a small tablet as an e-reader. However, I do find its body a little on the sharp side. E-readers tend to have rounded sides and corners for a reason — they are more comfortable to hold for extended periods. Hannspree does offer a case, though, which will solve that problem. It’s even included.
And for all its glass-and-metal glitz, the Hannspree Lumo has no water-resistance rating, so it should be used with caution in the bath or by the poolside.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Screen
LCD screen
60Hz refresh
Front light
The display is the most interesting part of the Hannspree Lumo. It’s a 7.8-inch “sunlight readable” LCD, recreating one of the top features of E Ink tech, that direct sunlight makes it clearer. Ambient light is not something a backlight has to fight against, which is a win for battery life and for making the screen less of an eye-strainer.
Advertisement
This is combined with radically better motion handling than any E Ink ereader. In an E Ink screen, black and white microcapsules are pulled to the front of the screen to create the image, which leaves ghosting residue until the screen is “flashed” to reset it.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
There’s no such ghosting in the Hannspree Lumo, and its motion appears far smoother and more responsive. It’s a better e-reader for video than one of the Android-based Boox models that can also, for example, run YouTube.
My issue is that I don’t find the Hannspree Lumo nearly as good as a classic Kindle Paperwhite for actual reading. 1024 x 768 pixels spread over 7.8 inches leads to a pixel density of 164ppi, where a Kindle Paperwhite has a pixel density of 300ppi.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The small fonts of novels here appear quite soft and pixellated, and I find the lower pixel density look of the Hannspree Lumo’s LCD more distracting than that of an old low-res E Ink reader.
Advertisement
There’s more too. Even in a bright environment, I still feel I need to use the Hannspree Lumo front light to boost visibility as contrast is quite low and the “white” of the page is quite grey — even more so than the recent colour E Ink readers that sacrifice contrast for colour. Doing so also lightens up the screen’s blacks, so there’s no way to make contrast appear that satisfying.
I don’t love reading books on the Hannspree Lumo. And that is clearly a bit of a problem.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
As in the colour E Ink crowd, like the Kindle Colorsoft, colour depth and punch are quite limited too, although the number of colours this can display is an order of magnitude greater. Current colour E Ink tech can reproduce around 4000 colours, whereas the Hannspree Lumo can recreate 16.7 million, which will lead to far better-looking gradients and transitions.
One of the key things I wanted to try first-hand with the Hannspree Lumo was comics and graphic novels. I think most ereaders are far too small to do the job well. The same is really true here for larger format comics that fit a lot of panels and text onto a page, but there’s one key difference.
E Ink ereaders make flicking and zooming around pages feel bad, while the Hannspree Lumo does not. The Lumo makes a pretty good comic book reader as a result.
Advertisement
Performance and software
Plain Android 14 software
(Almost) no non-Google apps preinstalled
Low-end MediaTek G99 processor
Hannspree has put almost comically little effort into customising the Lumo’s software. But I don’t actually think that’s necessarily a problem.
The Hannspree Lumo runs a plain version of Android 14, and fresh out of the box, it only has Google apps preinstalled, plus a basic camera app and sound recorder. There’s no Hannspree ebook reader app or app store. It’s up to you to head into Google Play and find your own e-reader interface.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
I’ve mostly used the Amazon Kindle app during testing, but you could just as easily use Libby, Kobo, or a plain e-reader app geared up to let you use your own digital files.
I wouldn’t like to see a super-standard Android interface in an E Ink reader as the display tech’s clunky motion calls for something simplified. But here? The Hannspree Lumo basically feels like a tablet so plain Android fits perfectly.
Advertisement
It doesn’t have a whole heap of power, though. The Hannspree Lumo has a MediaTek G99 processor, which was released back in 2022. It has 64GB storage and a lowly 4GB RAM.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
It scores just 2006 points in Geekbench 6, equivalent to flagship Android device performance from 2018. A Lumo is still a bunch more powerful than a Kindle Paperwhite, but it’s also based around software that presumes such greater performance.
For fun, I tried out Fortnite on the Hannspree Lumo. It managed a frame about every five seconds initially. Toning down the visuals as much as possible didn’t really help much, and not only do matches take an eternity to load, but the game also crashes to the home screen before you get into gameplay more often than not.
Advertisement
The Lumo feels just fine for the basics, but come with realistic expectations.
Cameras, speakers and battery life
Modest dual 5/8MP cameras
Optional stylus
Single speaker
Advertisement
The Hannspree Lumo has most of the features usually associated with tablets, including plenty generally missing from ereaders. There are front and rear cameras, with 5MP and 8MP sensors.
Neither one is particularly good, but either can capture serviceable photos with one annoying caveat. The front camera lacks autofocus, and the lens’s focal plane means you have to hold the Hannspree Lumo at full arm’s length, or your face will appear slightly out of focus.
Do that, though, and the results can be pretty respectable given this is a device that, let’s be honest, doesn’t really require a camera.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The higher expectations of rear cameras mean it’s this higher-spec 8MP that actually disappoints. Even when shooting in daylight, the detail looks fuzzy up close, there are not masses of it, and image integrity drops off dramatically in the corners of the frame. The Hannspree Lumo doesn’t need any better cameras than it has, though, and you need to transfer the images to another device to see them at their best anyway.
Similarly, the Hannspree Lumo’s speaker array isn’t great by tablet standards either. There’s a single speaker on the right side when the Lumo is held upright. It can’t produce any bass, and the treble is a bit insistent, but it will do the job for the occasional YouTube video. For longer-term audiobook listening, I’d consider using wireless headphones or a Bluetooth speaker, which the Hannspree Lumo can stream to.
Advertisement
And battery life? Hannspree claims the relatively small 3000mAh battery lasts up to 6.5 hours of use.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
I tried playing a video with the front night at a very low setting, then at max. At the low setting, the Lumo can last up to around 10 hours. And even at max brightness, 93 minutes of video playback only took 18 per cent off the battery, suggesting stamina of up to 8.5 hours rather than 6.5. A conservative battery estimate is a rarity these days.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
You can also get an active stylus for the Hannspree Lumo, available for a very reasonable £30-ish. It has a rechargeable battery and a replaceable nib, just like the more expensive digital pens from the bigger brands. It’s a fully pressure-sensitive pen with tilt sensing too, making it a solid option for digital artwork. It feels perfectly good in use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Should you buy it?
You want an e-reader with far better motion handling
If you want the low eye strain look of an e-reader but can’t put up with the jerky, clunky-looking motion of E Ink, a Lumo is one of the better options out there right now. Great for scrolling through large PDFs.
Advertisement
You want a peak reading experience
We prefer classic E Ink readers for actual reading of novels, as they provide better contrast, higher sharpness and an all-round clearer representation of small fonts.
Advertisement
Final Thoughts
The Hannspree Lumo is an interesting tablet that doesn’t quite achieve its goal of merging the best bits of tablets and ereaders, like those in the Amazon Kindle range.
Yes, it does have a screen that can draw on ambient light and dramatically outclasses Kindles in motion and refresh. But few, if any, are going to argue that the Hannspree Lumo is better for reading plain old novels than a classic ereader.
Advertisement
There’s a decent argument, however, that its superior motion, navigation, and colour fidelity make the Hannspree Lumo a solid option for those more interested in comics and PDFs than in novels. For more options, take a look at our selection of the best E Ink tablets.
How We Test
We test every tablet we review thoroughly. We use industry-standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.
Used as main E Ink tablet for over a week
Read multiple books
Taken a lot of notes
FAQs
Is the Hannspree Lumo E Ink?
The tablet uses an LCD screen, not an E Ink one.
Advertisement
Is the Hannspree Lumo waterproof?
It has no water resistance rating, so it should be used carefully around liquids.
Let’s stop for a moment and pause to consider the smart bulb. Imagine going back 20 years and telling yourself that people will be putting computers capable of acting as web servers into light bulbs just so they can control them from their telephone instead of hitting the switch. The whole thing seems crazy — but its great, because it enables hacks like this one where [RickOOOOOO] takes a commercially-available ESP32 smart bulb, and hacks it into a local file server and digital library for banned books.
The word “banned” gets bandied about a lot — but assured, there’s nothing getting served up by [RickOOOOOO]’s bulb that’s going to help somebody will ill-intent build an improvised explosive device. No, at least as conceived here, it appears to be full of easily-available e-books that were pulled from school libraries in the USA, which may-or-may not meet your personal definition of ‘banned’. Whatever you want to call them, we appreciate the idea that a student could hypothetically replace one of the bulbs at school with a hacked version serving up that sort of content. a bulb in such a school with a bulb hacked to host that sort of content–in minecraft, naturally.
In any case, the hardest part of the hack was carving the ESP32C3 in the bulb out of the IoToreo bulb enough to access it. Unfortunately having done so, [Rick] wasn’t able to get an SDcard interface soldered on, so he’s stuck with just 4MB for books and webserver. That means only a few epubs can fit on the bulb, but it’s better than those books being unavailable.
Like the solarpunk message board we featured recently, which also ran on an ESP32, the bulb broadcasts a public network that uses a captive portal to take you to the web interface of the library. From there, users can browse books– including learning from where they were banned and why–and admins can access a password-protected control panel. One neat work-in-progress feature on the control panel is that the bulb can still be used as a smart bulb, so you can try and match the light to its surroundings. In Minecraft, because of course we would never encourage kids to change light bulbs. Perish the thought!
But will it see the same success as the MacBook Neo?
Dell
Dell announced the return of the XPS 13 late last month and said broadly that it would be available in June. The low-cost laptop is now available on both virtual and brick-and-mortar store shelves. It retails starting at $599 for students and $699 for other customers.
The Dell XPS 13 announcement came hot on the heels of Apple unveiling its first true budget laptop. The MacBook Neo is designed for education, targeting both teachers and students as its likely buyers and it impressed in our review. Apple even secured a deal to bring its gear, including more than 4,500 MacBook Neos, to the Kansas City Public Schools. It should be interesting to watch whether Dell will see the same success as Apple has been enjoying for such a similar laptop.
Apple‘s first foldable iPhone is still expected to debut later this year, but the company may already be looking beyond its first attempt. According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple is planning a second-generation foldable iPhone for release in 2027, just one year after the original model is expected to arrive. The device is reportedly codenamed V78 and will launch alongside the 20th-anniversary iPhone model. It looks like Apple might be going all in on foldables as a long-term product category rather than a one-off experiment.
The Cupertino giant has spent years watching rival smartphone makers refine foldable hardware. Samsung, Google, Honor, Oppo, and others have gone through multiple generations of designs, experimenting with everything from narrow book-style devices to wider tablet-like formats. Apple appears to have waited until the category matured before making its move.
Apple may have learned from Android’s foldable experiments
Based on leaks and replica models that have surfaced in recent months, Apple’s foldable iPhone is expected to use a relatively short and wide design rather than the tall, narrow form factor seen on earlier Samsung Galaxy Z Fold devices. The device is rumored to feature a 5.5-inch cover display and a 7.8-inch inner panel with a 4:3 screen format.
iPhone UltraSourav/Twitter
That layout mirrors much of Apple’s iPad lineup and could provide a more natural and familiar experience for multitasking, reading, and running apps side by side. At 7.8 inches, the inner display would also come close to the iPad mini‘s 8.3-inch screen, potentially giving users a tablet-like experience when the device is unfolded. Apple appears to be preparing the software side as well, encouraging developers to ensure their apps adapt smoothly to different screen sizes and display formats.
Even Samsung appears to be moving in the same direction
Interestingly, Samsung may be arriving at a similar conclusion. Rumors suggest the company is preparing a wider foldable design for next year’s lineup, with the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide potentially becoming the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8. A taller version could reportedly be positioned as the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra instead.
Advertisement
Foldable iPhoneMajinBuofficia
Whether Apple’s foldable strategy pays off remains to be seen, but the company does not appear to be treating the device as a one-year experiment. A second-generation model already in development suggests Apple expects the iPhone Ultra to establish itself as a permanent tier within the iPhone lineup, with enough demand to support regular annual updates.
Monitor Audio has launched the Radius Series 4G, a redesigned compact speaker range aimed at listeners and installers who need serious sound without large cabinets taking over the room.
The new lineup includes the Radius 1, Radius 3, and Radius On-Wall, supported by matching floor stands, desk pads, and wall bracket options. That gives the Radius Series 4G a broader role than a typical small speaker refresh. It can be configured for two-channel listening, desktop audio, multi-room systems, home theater, and commercial installations where space, appearance, and mounting flexibility matter almost as much as sound quality.
Monitor Audio is positioning Radius Series 4G around its Transparent Design Philosophy, but the bigger story is practical: compact loudspeakers that are designed to look finished in modern residential and commercial spaces, while still being flexible enough for stereo, surround, and near-field applications. Small speakers are often treated like compromise products. Radius 4G looks more like Monitor Audio trying to make the category useful again.
Monitor Audio Radius 1 4G
Compact Speakers, Smarter Engineering
The Radius Series 4G is still a compact speaker range, but Monitor Audio has put meaningful engineering into this generation rather than simply updating the cabinets and calling it a day.
Advertisement
The core driver technology remains Monitor Audio’s C-CAM cone material, which uses a ceramic-coated aluminium/magnesium structure designed to be light, rigid, and resistant to unwanted flexing. For Radius 4G, that driver platform now incorporates RST III cone geometry, a surface pattern developed to reduce breakup and resonance across the frequency range. In a small speaker, that matters. There is only so much cabinet volume to work with, so driver control becomes a much bigger part of the performance equation.
The tweeter has also been redesigned. Radius Series 4G uses a new C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter with an external magnet motor system, bringing it closer in concept to a full drive unit rather than relying on a more conventional internal puck magnet design. Monitor Audio says the goal is greater control and cleaner high-frequency performance, which should help the Radius models sound more open without becoming bright or thin.
Monitor Audio Radius 3 4G on Floor Stands
The crossover networks have also been reworked with new measurement, listening, and component selection. That is not the flashiest part of the story, but it is often where compact speakers either come together or fall apart. Good drivers still need to be integrated properly, especially when the speaker is being used for desktop listening, wall-mounted applications, or home cinema channels.
Cabinet construction has received attention as well. Monitor Audio uses Through-Bolt Driver Bracing to lock the drive units to the rear of the cabinet at a specific torque, improving rigidity while reducing unwanted chassis resonance. Each model also includes Monitor Audio’s HiVe II port design, created to improve airflow and bass control. On the new Radius 3, the port is 50 percent larger than the previous generation, which should help it deliver more low-frequency output from a still-compact enclosure.
Advertisement
The accessory range is also part of the story. The Radius 4G Floor Stand uses wooden tripod legs with internal cable routing, giving the speaker a more furniture-friendly presence. The Desk Pad is made from vibration-isolating rubber and gives the speaker a slight upward tilt for near-field listening. Add in the wall bracket options, and Radius 4G starts to look less like a single-use compact speaker and more like a flexible system for stereo, desktop, surround, multi-room, and commercial installation use.
Monitor Audio Radius Series 4G Product Lineup
Monitor Audio Radius 1 4G
Monitor Audio Radius 1 4G with Desk Pad
The Radius 1 4G is the smallest model in the new Radius Series 4G lineup, designed for discreet AV, surround, multi-room, desktop, and compact stereo applications. It uses a 4-inch RST III bass/mid driver with Monitor Audio’s C-CAM cone technology and a 19 mm C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter in a sealed 2-way cabinet.
Key specs and options:
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Price: $525 per pair
System: 2-way compact speaker
Drivers: 4-inch RST III bass/mid driver, 19 mm C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter
Frequency response: 100 Hz to 35 kHz, in-room, -6 dB
Sensitivity: 82 dB
Nominal impedance: 8 ohms
Minimum impedance: 3.8 ohms at 950 Hz
Power handling: 50 watts
Recommended amplifier power: 25 to 50 watts into 8 ohms, 50 to 100 watts into 4 ohms
Bass alignment: Sealed
Crossover frequency: 3.2 kHz
Dimensions: 5 5/16 x 5 5/16 x 6 1/8 inches
Weight: 3 lb 15 oz each
Finishes: High Gloss Black, Satin White
Sold as: Pair
Compatible mounts: MASM, FIX-M
Monitor Audio Radius 3 4G
Monitor Audio Radius 3 4G with Desk Pad
The Radius 3 4G is the larger mini-monitor in the range and the most flexible choice for stereo, TV, gaming, desktop, multi-room, and small commercial installations. It steps up to a 4.5-inch RST III bass/mid driver, a 25 mm C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter, and a ported cabinet for deeper bass extension than the Radius 1 4G.
Key specs and options:
Advertisement
Price: $725 per pair
System: 2-way compact mini-monitor
Drivers: 4.5-inch RST III bass/mid driver, 25 mm C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter
Frequency response: 44 Hz to 35 kHz, in-room, -6 dB
Sensitivity: 84 dB
Nominal impedance: 8 ohms
Minimum impedance: 4 ohms at 250 Hz
Power handling: 75 watts
Recommended amplifier power: 40 to 75 watts into 8 ohms, 75 to 150 watts into 4 ohms
Bass alignment: Ported
Port tuning frequency: 53 Hz
Crossover frequency: 2.7 kHz
Dimensions: 10 1/16 x 5 7/8 x 7 15/16 inches
Weight: 8 lb 3 oz each
Finishes: High Gloss Black, Satin White
Sold as: Pair
Compatible mount: FIX-M
Placement options: Desktop, floor stand, or wall mount
Monitor Audio Radius On-Wall 4G
The Radius On-Wall 4G is the TV and home cinema model in the Radius 4G range. It is designed for horizontal or vertical wall placement around a screen and uses two 4.5-inch RST III bass/mid drivers with a 25 mm C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter in a slim ported cabinet. A wall bracket and fixing template are supplied.
Key specs and options:
Price: $575 each
System: 2-way on-wall speaker
Drivers: Two 4.5-inch RST III bass/mid drivers, 25 mm C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter
Frequency response: 69 Hz to 35 kHz, in-room, -6 dB
Sensitivity: 90 dB installed
Nominal impedance: 8 ohms
Minimum impedance: 4.4 ohms at 700 Hz
Power handling: 100 watts
Recommended amplifier power: 50 to 100 watts into 8 ohms, 100 to 200 watts into 4 ohms
Bass alignment: Ported
Port tuning frequency: 62 Hz
Crossover frequency: 2.3 kHz
Dimensions: 29 1/2 x 6 1/16 x 3 1/16 inches
Weight: 14 lb 2 oz each
Finishes: High Gloss Black, Satin White
Sold as: Single
Installation: Horizontal or vertical wall mounting, supplied bracket and fixing template
Monitor Audio Radius Floor Stand 4G
Monitor Audio Radius 3 4G on Floor Stand
The Radius Floor Stand 4G is designed for the Radius 1 4G and Radius 3 4G. The stand uses wooden tripod legs, a single-bolt speaker attachment, and integrated cable routing that lets speaker cable exit cleanly at the base.
Key specs and options:
Price: $395 per pair
Compatibility: Radius 1 4G and Radius 3 4G
Design: Wooden tripod legs
Cable management: Internal cable routing through the stand
Speaker attachment: Single-bolt fixing
Dimensions: 30 11/16 x 20 1/16 x 17 7/16 inches
Weight: 3 lb 5 oz
Finishes: Black, White
Sold as: Pair
Monitor Audio Radius Desk Pad 4G
Radius 1 4G with Desk Pad
The Radius Desk Pad 4G is made for Radius 1 4G and Radius 3 4G desktop placement. It uses rubber with a specified hardness for vibration isolation and adds a slight upward tilt to aim the speakers more effectively in near-field setups.
Key specs and options:
Price: $40 per pair
Compatibility: Radius 1 4G and Radius 3 4G
Material: Rubber
Purpose: Desktop stability, vibration isolation, and upward speaker tilt
Dimensions: 15/16 x 4 1/2 x 5 7/16 inches
Weight: 14 oz
Finish: Black
Sold as: Pair
Monitor Audio FIX-M Speaker Mount
The FIX-M is the more adjustable wall-mount option for Radius 1 4G and Radius 3 4G. It allows 0, 15, or 30-degree angle settings from center, and the rotating front section creates 14 possible positions.
The MASM Mount is a smaller wall or ceiling mount for users who want to get compact speakers off the desk or furniture. It uses a ball-joint connection for positioning and is listed as compatible with Radius 1 4G.
The Monitor Audio Radius Series 4G is not trying to replace a full-size hi-fi speaker system, and that is the point. Its appeal is the combination of compact cabinets, real Monitor Audio driver technology, flexible mounting options, and a cleaner design language that works in rooms where traditional speakers are either too large or too visually intrusive.
What makes Radius 4G different is the range of applications. Radius 1 4G can handle discreet surround, desktop, and multi-room duties; Radius 3 4G is the more capable compact stereo, TV, gaming, and near-field option; and Radius On-Wall 4G gives installers and home theater users a slim horizontal or vertical speaker for screen-based systems. Add the dedicated floor stands, desk pads, and wall brackets, and this becomes less of a small speaker refresh and more of a flexible compact audio system.
Advertisement
This is for apartment dwellers, design-conscious listeners, desktop users, custom installers, and anyone building a living room, media room, retail, hospitality, or office system where sound quality matters but big boxes are a non-starter. Bass obsessives and large-room listeners will still want a subwoofer, but for modern spaces that demand compact speakers with legitimate hi-fi intent, Radius 4G makes a lot of sense.
There are playground politics, multiplication tables and learning to read.
Imagine dealing with all that in a new language — or even a whole new country.
That’s the added challenge for kids who are learning English at the same time they’re learning everything else as their peers.
Advertisement
It’s an issue that Sarah Walters and her colleagues were determined to tackle in Troy City Schools, a public school district made up of nine campuses roughly an hour north of Cincinnati. The area is home to an automotive manufacturer that brings some employees — and their families — over from Japan.
Roughly 3 percent of the 4,000 students have primary languages like Spanish, Ukrainian and Japanese, a relatively small population compared to the most recent national average of 11 percent.
But that small group is making big gains. Looking to close the literacy gaps that have plagued schools since the pandemic, the district took a big swing to increase literacy among its English learners. It trained 116 staff members — including every elementary teacher, intervention specialist, paraprofessional and principal — in the Orton-Gillingham approach, which folds movement and touch into reading instruction.
They say it’s paying off.
Advertisement
Walters, a literacy instructional support specialist, says that helping multilingual students master their grasp on English is vital. Like any other student, the foundation that they lay in reading and math will affect their learning from that point on.
NEWSLETTERS
STAY AHEAD IN EDUCATION.
Sign up for EdSurge newsletters for timely news, insights and analysis.
“We want to help the students continue to thrive, and really everything that we’re thinking about with our student services is equitable learning opportunities,” Walters says.
Advertisement
Moving Toward Equity
Federal data shows that English learners’ achievement scores lag far behind their peers on average, and have made little improvement over the past two decades.
Troy City Schools was eager to close widening literacy gaps that surfaced after the onset of the pandemic, Walters says, which was particularly hard on English learners like those at Concord Elementary. A big hurdle was phonics, the letter sounds that make up words.
“We were seeing a lot of student frustration and wanting to give up,” Walters recalls. “Students being very withdrawn, those social-emotional impacts.”
Back in 2020, English-language instruction was inconsistent and fragmented across classrooms.
Advertisement
Yet, even with the desire to boost English learner scores, the program took some time.
Following the pandemic, Troy City Schools mulled over the changes for three years before it had enough funding to deliver on it, according to Danielle Romine, director of elementary teaching and learning for the district. The effort was funded through post-COVID relief grants and budget allocations made by the district’s leaders.
As a literacy specialist, Walters became certified in the Orton-Gillingham method through the Institute for Multi-Sensory Education. She’s now responsible for supporting and training staff to successfully use the techniques.
Fourth-grade students at Concord Elementary participate in the auditory-kinesthetic drill as part of the Orton-Gillingham literacy method. The teacher dictates sounds as students use sand to write the letters represented by the sound, an activity meant to help with long-term recall of what they learn. Photo courtesy of Troy Public Schools.
Walters says teachers and staff were trained to utilize drills that connect literacy concepts through visuals, sound and movement. Students might use flash cards as a visual element or tap their fingers to each letter as they spell out a word. Students also learn the origin and history of words to strengthen their ability to decode them. For example, a “red word” is one that does not follow phonics rules.
Advertisement
“Our multilingual learners love it because no longer are they being told, ‘That’s just the way it is,’” Walters says.
After an initial summer training on the Orton-Gillingham approach, teachers spoke so highly of the method that requests for training grew among staff.
Initial Promise
“In a school district, if you want to get something out, just tell a teacher, because it [will] spread like wildfire,” Romine says.
And the data are showing promising results, Walter says. The district-wide third grade reading proficiency had plummeted to 56 percent in 2021-22 but had risen to 81 percent by 2023-24 — slightly higher than its pre-COVID achievement rate. The most recent state data shows Concord Elementary far surpassed its target goal for English proficiency among multilingual students.
Advertisement
A reading teacher demonstrates the sand tray activity as part of the Orton-Gillingham literacy approach.
Walters has heard from teachers who say that the approach has helped some English learner students make lightning-fast gains in reading. One educator told her that two students from Japan who joined the elementary school in the fall were conversing in English by December. Another student’s phonics diagnostic score shot up by 38 points in the same timeframe.
Now, the district is working to spread the method beyond its own campuses.
“Eventually, our goal is to support the entire community, or the entire county because Sarah having that training [enables her] to support teachers from other districts, as well,” Romine says.
Advertisement
But for English learners, ensuring they’re on grade level in reading goes beyond measuring their success in the classroom.
Walters says that the district is thinking about long-term learning for children who, for example, may be in the U.S. for a few years before returning to Japan.
Now, the district is working to spread the method beyond its own campuses.
“Eventually, our goal is to support the entire community, or the entire county because Sarah having that training [enables her] to support teachers from other districts, as well,” Romine says.
Advertisement
But for English learners, ensuring they’re on grade level in reading goes beyond measuring their success in the classroom.
Walters says that the district is thinking about long-term learning for children who, for example, may be in the U.S. for a few years before returning to Japan.
“We want students to have success across math, science, everything,” Walters says. “So it’s important that we get them up to speed as quickly as possible, because those long-term impacts could really be harmful for them. That early literacy is key.”
A UC Davis BCI implant let an ALS patient speak independently for 3,800+ hours over two years with 99% accuracy, enabling him to work full time.
A man with ALS has been using a brain implant to speak independently for more than 3,800 hours over the past two years, producing nearly 2 million words with an average speed of 56 words per minute. The study, published Monday in Nature Medicine by researchers at the University of California, Davis, represents the longest sustained demonstration that a brain-computer interface can function as a practical daily communication tool outside a laboratory. Casey Harrell, the 47-year-old participant, has used the system to return to full-time work as an environmental advocate.
The implant consists of four microelectrode arrays placed in Harrell’s left precentral gyrus, the brain region that coordinates speech, recording activity from 256 cortical electrodes. Machine learning algorithms built into a software platform called BRAND, developed by UC Davis postdoctoral fellow Nicholas Card, translate that neural activity into English-language phonemes, then map those phonemes to words and sentences. The system reads out the decoded text in a synthesised version of Harrell’s pre-ALS voice.
In controlled testing with a 125,000-word vocabulary, the system scored over 99% word accuracy. In daily use outside the lab, Harrell rated 92% of sentences as accurate or mostly correct. During the study period, he communicated more than 183,000 sentences.
Advertisement
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
“The key thing to me is that it’s enabling everyday communication for a guy who wants to talk but can’t,” neurosurgeon David Brandman, who implanted the device in 2023 and co-led the study, told The Register. “Despite being paralysed, he has gone back to work full time and has meaningful conversations with his daughter who’s never heard the sound of his voice.”
The study’s significance lies not just in accuracy but in independence. Previous BCI systems required researchers to be present in the patient’s home whenever the device was in use, or required the patient to travel to a lab. Harrell’s system is operated by his home care team, with no researcher support needed.
Advertisement
Based on the study’s timeline, he averaged more than five hours of daily use.
The UC Davis team is part of BrainGate, the consortium of universities and the US Department of Veterans Affairs developing brain-computer interfaces for speech restoration, computer control, and movement recovery. The hardware itself is not custom-built, using existing microelectrode arrays produced by Blackrock Neurotech. The breakthrough is in the software, specifically the BRAND platform’s machine learning algorithms that decode attempted speech from neural signals in real time.
Brandman compared the current state of BCI technology to early pacemakers, which in the 1950s required external wiring to large batteries or wall power. Seventy years later, pacemakers are implanted in outpatient procedures. “We’re at the early stages of this kind of technology,” Brandman said.
Harrell is still wired to external computers, but the UC Davis team’s AI advances combined with hardware miniaturisation work at companies like Neuralink, Synchron, and Paradromics point toward a future where the setup is far less cumbersome.
Advertisement
The competitive landscape in BCI is accelerating. Neuralink has implanted devices in at least 21 patients under research protocols but lacks commercial approval. China approved the first commercially available invasive BCI earlier this year.
What distinguishes the UC Davis work is its demonstration that a BCI can cross from laboratory experiment to sustained, practical daily tool. The 3,800 hours of brain recording also constitute the largest individual neural dataset with single-neuron resolution ever collected, according to co-principal investigator Sergey Stavisky, which will inform future improvements to the decoding algorithms.
The system remains an investigational device, limited by federal law to research use, and has been tested on a single patient. Whether the results generalise to other ALS patients, or to people with different neurological conditions, is not yet known. Scaling the technology from a clinical trial to a prescribed medical device will require regulatory approval, hardware miniaturisation, and cost reduction that could take years.
Advertisement
“I want desperately to not be unique or special, because that will mean I no longer have the disease or that everyone that has the disease like me can get this prescribed to them,” Harrell said through his BCI system.
Running low on memory, can’t afford more? The House of Zen’s latest acquisition puts an AI spin on flash-based memory expansion
With no end in sight to the memory crunch, AMD thinks that AI, the main cause of the shortage, could be part of the solution. This week, the House of Zen acquired predictive memory startup Mext for an undisclosed sum, setting the stage for a world where bots decide which data to put into RAM and which to store in less-expensive flash.
Founded in 2023, the Mext proactive memory platform uses machine learning algorithms and learned heuristics to proactively offload “cold” memory to flash storage, and, based on data access patterns, restore it before its needed again.
Advertisement
Modern flash arrays are already approaching main memory in terms of aggregate bandwidth, but swapping to disk still imposes a stiff latency penalty.
Mext claims it can expand the effective memory of a system by 2 to 4x using flash, which gig for gig is still vastly less expensive than DRAM.
This flash memory is exposed to the operating system like regular memory simply by running the Mextd daemon.
Memory tiering is nothing new and has seen various reincarnations over the years with some being software based and others, like Intel Optane persistent memory, using special 3D XPoint memory tech co-developed by Micron.
Advertisement
Mext stands out for its use of machine learning to migrate data from hot memory to cold storage almost like a branch predictor — something AMD has an awful lot of experience with.
Mext isn’t using one model to decide when to shuffle your data. Instead it uses a series of heuristics, long short term memory, and modern transformer architectures depending on which combination renders the best results.
“This approach has the potential to reduce infrastructure costs, improve resource utilization, and help customers more effectively scale general-purpose and AI workloads,” Dan McNamara SVP of AMD’s compute and enterprise AI biz wrote in a blog post this week.
Beyond enterprise applications, the technology could have implications for AI serving.
Advertisement
Modern mixture of experts (MoE) models are, as their name suggests, comprised of multiple sub-models.
For each token predicted, a different selection of experts may be used. In practice an LLM may use some experts more frequently and others rarely.
We wouldn’t be surprised to see AMD use Mext’s prediction algorithms to offload infrequently utilized experts from HBM to slower system memory, enabling enterprises to take advantage of larger more capable models with fewer resources.
That’s just speculation of course, but we’ve reached out to AMD for comment; we’ll let you know if we hear anything back. ®
A new, bipartisan idea is taking Washington by storm: collective ownership of the means of production.
Last Friday, President Donald Trump announced that he would soon be meeting with the executives of top AI companies to discuss a financial “partnership.”
“There are concepts where pieces [of these companies] could be given to the American public, where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies,” Trump said. “And by doing that, they’re going to like it better.”
President Donald Trump says the government may take ownership stakes in major AI companies and share the returns with the public — an idea pitched to him by OpenAI’s Sam Altman.
Critics suspect OpenAI’s real aim is to insulate itself from regulation and competition by aligning its profits with the government’s interests.
A broad, well-governed public wealth fund could genuinely help counter AI-driven inequality.
But an informal deal between the White House and a few favored firms is more likely to breed cronyism than spread wealth.
By this, the president (seemingly) meant that the US government may take an ownership stake in major AI companies and then distribute the fruits of its investments to the general public, perhaps through universal dividend payments.
This proposal did not come to Trump via some undercover, socialist operative embedded deep within the White House — but rather, from the CEO of OpenAI.
Advertisement
As NOTUS reported last week, Altman first pitched Trump on the concept in early 2025 and discussions between the administration and OpenAI have heated up more recently. No deal has been finalized. But talks have centered on an arrangement in which top AI labs voluntarily donate shares to the government — an approach that might enable Uncle Sam to partially nationalize the AI industry without Congress passing any law.
Officially, OpenAI’s interest in effectively transferring wealth from its shareholders to Uncle Sam is public-spirited. The company maintains that advances in AI are likely to generate massive profits for top labs, while sowing wrenching disruptions through labor markets. Thus, to ensure that ordinary people “share in the upside” of AI-fueled economic growth, the company has called for the creation of a “Public Wealth Fund,” which would invest in “both AI companies and the broader set of firms adopting and deploying AI,” and then send a portion of the returns to every American. In other words, it would pay out a universal basic income (another popular idea in Silicon Valley).
Yet many suspect OpenAI’s motives are more self-interested: By giving the US government a direct stake in its success, the company may be trying to insulate itself from stringent regulation or open competition. Moreover, whatever Altman’s intentions, skeptics argue that the government getting into cahoots with individual AI companies is a recipe for cronyism and conflicts of interest. (Disclosure: Vox Media is one of several publishers that have signed partnership agreements with OpenAI. Our reporting remains editorially independent.)
These concerns seem well-founded. A narrow partnership between the federal government and select AI companies would plausibly do more to generate corruption than redistribute income.
Advertisement
Yet there is a real risk that artificial intelligence will shift massive amounts of income away from workers and towards capital. And a highly diversified, scrupulously managed public wealth fund could help mitigate that hazard. Unfortunately, the Trump administration has evinced little interest in that approach to social ownership (or in scruples more broadly).
Why is OpenAI trying to get itself nationalized?
Companies don’t typically cook up schemes for reducing the value of their own shares. And yet, on its face, OpenAI’s reported proposal amounts to precisely that: If the company donates equity to the government, it will dilute the value of all its existing stock.
This invites the question: What’s in it for them?
Advertisement
There are multiple plausible answers. OpenAI may be trying to limit its exposure to regulation. In opinion polls, a supermajority of Americans express concern for where AI is taking their society — and support for more heavily regulating the industry.
Turning every American into an OpenAI shareholder could theoretically reduce the company’s susceptibility to onerous new rules in a couple of different ways. First, doing so may simply soften the AI industry’s image and buy it some goodwill from the American electorate (Trump seemed to reference this when saying that his arrangement would make Americans like AI better).
Second, such an arrangement would more closely align the public’s interests with those of OpenAI. After all, regulations that reduce the firm’s profitability would now also cut government revenue and/or, Americans’ dividend payments (such payouts might be small at first, but could become substantial over time, particularly if the government cuts deals with other major AI labs). Voters might be less inclined to protest a noisy data center if they think they’re directly profiting from it.
Similarly, accepting partial nationalization could boost OpenAI’s odds of securing a federal bailout if its revenues do not grow fast enough to cover its debts (a scenario that some analysts consider quite likely). There is a long history of governments shielding state-owned enterprises from market discipline. Thus, the progressive economist Dean Baker fears that an AI wealth fund would “end up being a mechanism to shovel yet more money” at billionaires aligned with the administration.
Advertisement
It is also possible that, by donating shares to the government, individual AI firms might buy themselves an advantage over their competitors. For its part, the Trump administration has displayed no shyness about rewarding businesses that curry its favor, and retaliating against those who do not.
Indeed, the White House has already tried to sabotage OpenAI’s chief rival. In February, Anthropic refused to sign a contract that would have authorized the Pentagon to use its AI for mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons systems. The Defense Department responded by declaring Anthropic a “supply chain risk” — a designation that would restrict the capacity of government contractors to do business with the AI company. If a federal judge had not blocked that move, it could have done serious damage to Anthropic’s business — while benefiting both OpenAI and xAI, which is owned by Trump megadonor Elon Musk.
If the government took a stake in OpenAI but not Anthropic — or in all the major AI labs but not in more recent startups — the Trump administration might have further incentive to intervene on behalf of its favored firms.
Separately, the White House could use a public wealth fund to unduly influence AI labs’ decision-making. The government’s shares could give it the power to vote on companies’ internal policies — or else, seek to deter certain decisions with threats of selling off the firm’s stock.
Advertisement
These risks are amplified by the reportedly informal and ad-hoc nature of the public wealth fund being contemplated. Without congressionally authorized rules governing the fund’s management and investment decisions, the administration could have wide latitude to use its newfound financial power in self-interested ways.
“It would be good for OpenAI to have every American underwriting them,” Samuel Hammond, Director of Artificial Intelligence Policy at the Foundation for American Innovation, told me. “But in America’s political context, we’re likely to get a corrupted version of a state enterprise that is used for personal enrichment and the partisan motives of whoever’s in charge.”
The case for having a little communism, as a treat
Although Trump’s (reported) version of a public wealth fund seems to invite more risks than benefits, this would not necessarily be true of all such funds.
Advertisement
As a general concept, combating AI-induced inequality by increasing public ownership of corporations has much to recommend it.
Artificial intelligence could greatly increase investors’ share of national income at workers’ expense: If companies replace much of their high-skill workforce with AI, their shareholders could reap the benefits, even as white-collar laborers lose their jobs and bargaining power.
And if the technology truly takes off, generating an explosively productive economy run by software and robots instead of people, the AI giants could end up harvesting profits of mind-bending scale.
At the very least, this is what a lot of investors are seemingly betting on. Despite myriad economic headwinds, stock prices are hovering near record highs, due largely to the sky-high valuations of AI stocks. Meanwhile, Anthropic and OpenAI’s impending initial public offerings are expected to be among the biggest in history, and Musk could soon become a trillionaire.
Advertisement
The government could seek to share this wealth through traditional tax and transfer policies: If investors and tech firms are raking in cash, Congress can raise rates on capital gains, inheritances, and corporate income, then use the proceeds to fund more generous social programs or cash benefits for ordinary Americans.
Conventional taxes are surely part of the solution. As an approach to redistributing business income, however, a public (or “social”) wealth fund has some advantages over corporate taxes.
The corporate income tax applies only to the profits a company reports, which firms have considerable latitude and incentive to minimize. Large enterprises spend vast sums of money each year on finding innovative ways to defer or relocate their profits, so as to reduce their liabilities. The government then must dedicate its own resources to auditing these practices. This system not only enables corporations to weasel out of their obligations but also generates tremendous waste: All the skilled labor and entrepreneurial energy currently devoted to tax avoidance could otherwise be deployed towards creating actual value for consumers.
A public wealth fund circumvents these problems. Suppose that, instead of taxing corporate profits at 25 percent, the government required each firm to hand over newly issued shares equal to 25 percent of its total stock. From then on, whenever the company paid a dividend or bought back shares, the government would automatically collect a quarter of the payout. With this approach, a business’s profits have nowhere to hide: A company can shift its earnings to a subsidiary in Dublin or a mailbox in Singapore. Regardless, if that corporation wants to reward its shareholders, Uncle Sam will get his cut. And even if the company hoards its cash, when its operations get more profitable, its stock will rise — and the government’s portfolio will gain value.
Advertisement
Separately, a public wealth fund could have political advantages over traditional tax-and-transfer programs. Once voters get accustomed to the idea that they collectively own a share of their society’s financial wealth, dividends paid out of those assets may be seen more as an entitlement than a handout.
The Alaska Permanent Fund is a case in point. In the 1970s, Alaska used royalties on its oil resources to seed a financial fund owned by all its residents in common. This year, it will pay out $1,200 to each Alaskan. Critically, despite Alaska’s conservative bent — and Americans’ general skepticism toward unconditional cash welfare — the permanent fund is overwhelmingly popular among Alaskans, and no serious effort has been made to restrict eligibility for dividends.
“There’s this notion that we all own this,” Matt Bruenig, founder of the People’s Policy Project and a leading advocate for social wealth funds, said. “So, there’s this attitude of: Maybe I disapprove of you or speculate that you’re going to blow your dividend on a snow machine or whatever. But it’s not my business. It’s your money.”
It’s possible that this consensus reflects the particular origins of Alaska’s fund: The idea that everyone has some entitlement to their state’s oil reserves — which no human being brought into existence — may be more intuitive than the notion that we all deserve a share of corporate profits writ large.
Advertisement
Yet American companies’ value derives in large part from inherited technologies, knowledge, and institutions that no living person created — as well as public goods that all US workers and taxpayers help to sustain.
And artificial intelligence may make the social origins of private profits more readily apparent: As Bernie Sanders recently noted, when AI generates useful code, images, or writing, it does so by synthesizing vast corpuses of data that humanity collectively produced.
Granted, America would probably screw this up
To be sure, a broad social wealth fund would present some of the same risks as the rumored Trump-Altman proposal.
Advertisement
Although a fund that invested in all corporations would be less likely to fuel government favoritism towards select firms or industries, such a policy would still align the government’s interests with those of corporate shareholders: Any new regulation that reduced the corporate sector’s profitability — whether by increasing its labor costs, environmental responsibilities, or some other mechanism — would simultaneously reduce the government’s revenue and potentially, voters’ dividend payments. Some on the left oppose social wealth funds on these grounds.
And yet, the government already has a stake in corporate profitability: When firms earn less profit, they pay less in taxes. A public wealth fund might make this reality more apparent. But the alignment of interest between the state and corporate shareholders is inherent in capitalism. And democratic governments have nonetheless constrained businesses’ profits in myriad ways, for better and worse.
This said, a public wealth fund would undoubtedly risk centralizing economic power and thus, abetting corruption: The government could theoretically leverage its status as a mega-shareholder to micro-manage the internal operations of private businesses. A world in which the Trump administration and its allies exercised influence over every corporate news outlet — rather than just some — would be less than favorable for democratic freedom.
This threat is also manageable in principle. One approach would be to simply have the public wealth fund hold exclusively nonvoting shares, which would limit the government’s role in corporate decisionmaking. Another would be to establish transparent, technocratic, and bipartisan rules for how the public wealth fund will exercise its voice in corporate affairs, as Norway has already done for its own fund.
Advertisement
Of course, many things are possible in principle but not in today’s United States. A rule-bound, universal social wealth fund might help ordinary Americans share in the fruits of AI-fueled economic growth. A voluntary partnership between the Trump administration and select AI firms, by contrast, seems more likely to help the president’s favorite companies limit their investors’ downside risks.
After multiple delays, Shrek is back, and he is bringing the whole family time! DreamWorks has released the first trailer for Shrek 5, and it is exactly as chaotic as you would hope. The film marks the franchise’s return after 17 years since Shrek Forever After in 2010, and it hits theaters on June 30, 2027.
The wild moments in the Shrek 5 trailer
Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, and Cameron Diaz are all back as Shrek, Donkey, and Fiona. The trailer opens with a storybook recap of the original story, before Donkey interrupts to announce it is time for a makeover.
The gang, now joined by Shrek and Fiona’s three grown-up kids, head to a new city called Further Further Away, which is sketchier than Far, Far Away ever was.
Advertisement
DreamWorks
The trailer wastes no time in serving up a Gingerbread Man with two gumdrops strapped to his butt, proudly declaring he is “caked up like a friggin’ bakery,” followed by some very enthusiastic twerking.
There is also a melting, grimy snowman lurking in a back alley asking, “Wanna date a snowman?” taking a dig at Frozen’s Olaf.
Where is Zendaya’s character Felicia in the Shrek 5 trailer?
DreamWorks
Zendaya voices Felicia, Shrek and Fiona’s daughter, and her involvement in Shrek 5 has been confirmed. However, she is completely absent from the trailer footage. Shrek can be seen in the jail cell with Fiona and his two sons, Fergus and Farkle, but Felicia is nowhere to be found. Whether Felicia got kidnapped or simply had better weekend plans is anyone’s guess.
Why are fans upset about the Shrek 5 trailer?
Not everyone is thrilled with how the trailer looks, though. Many fans have taken issue with the updated animation style, which makes Shrek and Donkey look noticeably more detailed and lifelike than in the previous films.
its actually insane that a movie from 15+ years ago has infinitely better lighting, skin textures than movie coming out in 2027. how did technology regress this badly?? they need to throw out the new assets and bring back the classics. #fixourshrek#shrekisnotminions#notmyshrek
Comments on Universal’s Instagram ranged from “we want the old Shrek back” to “do what they did with Sonic,” a reference to how Paramount famously redesigned Sonic the Hedgehog after fans revolted over his original movie look. It’s too early to say if Universal would be forced to do the same.
On Wednesday morning, workers poured hydrogen peroxide into the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC.
The treatment is the latest attempt by the Interior Department to control an algae bloom that has turned the pool bright green, despite President Donald Trump’s costly renovation to make it “American flag blue” in time for the nation’s 250th anniversary. Hot temperatures and climate change are among the risk factors that could be driving the outbreak.
The Trump administration spent more than $14 million to update the pool ahead of celebrations across the US capital. The work was done under a no-bid contract by a company that has never worked for the federal government. (It has, however, worked on President Donald Trump’s golf courses, according to The New York Times.)
Algae began forming less than a day after the updated pool was unveiled last week. An Interior Department spokesperson told CNN that the bloom was due to “residual algae from the supply lines, which have been sitting dormant for eight weeks.”
Advertisement
One of the issues appears to be the water source. The Reflecting Pool usually draws water from the nearby Tidal Basin, which is often filled with algae. During periods with high amounts of algae, the water supply switches to municipal drinking water. The US Interior Department didn’t immediately respond to questions from WIRED about which water source is currently feeding the pool.
Another issue is the weather. High temperatures create “a perfect storm for [algae] to bloom,” says Hans Paerl, a former professor at the University of North Carolina’s Institute of Marine Sciences. Stagnant water, Pearl says, makes the problem even worse. “Lakes and reservoirs around the world—they all have this problem during this time of year.” Hotter-than-normal weather is expected to hit Washington, DC, to end the week, which could make controlling the bloom more challenging.
Paerl also points out another, related driver that the Trump administration has shown it’s not in a rush to resolve: climate change.
“It’s just getting hotter, and these blooms are expanding globally—they’re moving up into higher latitudes,” he says. “It’s clearly a temperature effect allowing them to optimize their growth.”
Advertisement
Beyond the hydrogen peroxide, the Interior Department is “deploying high-tech nanobubble ozone technology” to keep algae at bay, an agency spokesperson tells WIRED in an email.
Trump has touted the work on the pool, which includes painting it blue and fixing leaks, while also saying the company the government hired would be able to do repairs “in much less time, for much less money.”
You must be logged in to post a comment Login