OpenAI announced this week that it’s shutting down its Sora app and related video models just six months after launching the app.

On the latest episode of TechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I debated what the decision means for OpenAI and for the industry more broadly. To some extent, the move seems consistent with what we’ve been hearing about OpenAI as it focuses on enterprise and productivity tools ahead of a possible IPO.

In fact, Kirsten suggested that OpenAI’s decision to shutter Sora was “a sign of maturity that was nice to see in an AI lab.”

But Sora’s shutdown — along with ByteDance’s reported delay in launching its Seedance 2.0 video model worldwide — could also be a reality check moment for the makers of AI video tools, and for evangelists who claim these tools will be replacing Hollywood anytime soon.

Read a preview of our conversation, edited for length and clarity, below.

Anthony: I think it’s worth highlighting that it’s not just the app. I mean, the app was particularly unappealing to me, at least, and I think to other people, because it was this idea of a social network without people, where it’s just nothing but slop.

But beyond the app, it seems like OpenAI is basically winding down pretty much everything it’s doing with video. According to the Wall Street Journal, which broke some of this news, it’s really about this idea that Open AI is — in advance of potentially going public — really trying to focus on business products, enterprise products, programming products. [So] this consumer social app, [and] more broadly video, is not a priority right now.

Sean: Yeah, I never really used [the app]. The idea of it turned me off for a number of different reasons. And you know, it was a good reminder that Open AI — and I don’t mean this to knock them down in really any way —  but I think this was a reminder, probably, for them internally, of the element of luck […] in how successful ChatGPT became. 

Clearly, there is something that is valuable there to people, I don’t want to take away from that, because you do not get to the usage numbers that we’ve heard reported from them without there being something that is working right —and even more so that it’s been kept up over a number of years and developed into something that stays meaningful to people.

But there was an element of Sora, when it came out, of like, “We built the most successful consumer product ever, and now we’re doing it again. And we’re going to bring in Disney and all this stuff.” I think this is just a really harsh reminder of like it’s not always going to be an absolute shortcut to the top of the greatest consumer products ever and that there really needs to be something that people feel like they’re getting some meaning out of it for it to stick around. 

Kirsten: Yeah, I actually want to give OpenAI props for this decision, because we sometimes make fun of the whole idea of “move fast and break things,” but I think that there is some value [to] companies that can iterate very quickly and then kill off products that are not working and not feel a sense of failure behind it. I mean, there was real money that was lost. If you were to look at the deal with Disney, that was a billion dollar deal, but if you look at — and we don’t have the insight into this because we’re not seeing their balance sheets — but what were they spending on this and what was the long-term value for the company? 

And I think that while, sure, it was interesting to see what they could create, their decision to shutter it, to me, showed a sign of maturity that was nice to see in an AI lab.

Anthony: In terms of what it means for OpenAI, it seems very consistent with everything that we’ve been hearing about their strategy going forward. It doesn’t seem like a huge blow or anything like that in terms of how we think about the future of generative AI.

Particularly in video, it’s interesting because it also comes at this time that there’s been reporting around Seedance, which is the ByteDance generative AI model [for video]. There’s reports that [Seedance 2.0 has] been delayed because there’s engineering and legal questions and basically [figuring out], “Can we build IP protections into this?” Which apparently they hadn’t taken as seriously before. 

And so, it’s this reality check moment. There were these really hyperbolic statements, including from people within Hollywood that [were] like, “We’re done, this is the future, it’s just typing in prompts and making feature films.” And it turns out that for all kinds of technical and legal reasons, it is not that easy and we are very, very far from that happening.

Sean: And the last thing I think we should say about this, too, is this is one of a number of decisions that appear to be happening after Fidji Simo came in [and began] sort of running the day-to-day operations. That’s just a huge dynamic that’s changed inside of OpenAI. And I think the further we get away from that moment of of her being tapped to run the show, and especially these consumer products and decide the fate of them, the easier it’ll be to look back at this moment in time and think about how big a moment that was for this company.

The Veehop 4WD Scooter is worth a look for anyone who wants to take a scooter somewhere a standard two wheeler simply could not handle. Four wheels, each with its own electric motor and independent suspension, give it the kind of all terrain capability that the name suggests, and with the stem folded down it is compact and light enough to fit in most car trunks.

Each of the four hub motors produces 750 watts nominally and up to 1,500 watts at peak, combining for a total output of 6 kilowatts and 177 pound feet of torque. Top speed on flat ground sits at 31 mph, and a 50 percent incline is handled without complaint. With power going to each wheel independently, mud, rocks, gravel, and shallow water are all manageable terrain rather than reasons to turn back.

Sale

VOLPAM Electric Scooter for Adult, Dual Suspension, 21/31MPH Top Speed, 500W/800W Powerful Motor…

• Powerful Performance: Our 500W motor adult electric scooter reaches exhilarating speeds up to 19 MPH, which ideal for both adults and teens…
• Extended Range: The high-capacity battery powers this adult scooter for up to 23 miles on a single 4-5 hours charge. Cruise control maintains your…
• Comfortable Ride: The electric scooter is equipped with a dual suspension system and 10-inch solid tires to ensure that bumps are reduced and grip is…

Independent suspension keeps the deck level even when one side drops into a rut, and sturdy plating protects the frame and battery bay from scrapes across rough ground. At 154 pounds it is heavier than a standard scooter, but that weight starts to justify itself the moment the terrain gets interesting. Total load capacity sits at 441 pounds, and an optional saddle lets you ride seated while still controlling the throttle and steering through weight shifts.

The 60 volt battery pulls out in seconds for quick swaps, with a capacity of up to 40 amp hours giving you around 37 miles of range at a steady pace or closer to 25 miles if you are pushing hard. A full charge takes four to five hours with the standard charger, and anyone planning longer sessions can simply carry a spare battery and swap it out as needed.

The folding stem keeps storage straightforward, sliding into most car trunks without much fuss, though hauling it up a flight of stairs is a workout given the weight. A small handlebar display shows speed, battery level, and a basic ride overview, with a thumb throttle and a few simple buttons handling all the controls. The Veehop 4WD starts at 3,750 dollars for the full four-wheel-drive option, the two-wheel drive model comes in at 3,350 dollars. Both are shipping right now and the company is inviting customers to schedule a test ride. They’ve also got extra batteries and a few other smaller accessories up for sale as well.
[Source]

Tuesday March 31, is World Backup Day. It’s that necessary annual reminder to back up all our important data and documents. And with so many different ways to back up your files, once you’ve set it up, you can leave it unattended, safe in the knowledge that if the worst happens, you’re protected.

Below you’ll find a comprehensive collection of our favorite backup products and methods, including HDDs and SSDs — both internal and external — portable flash drives, SD cards, NAS systems, and software and cloud backup solutions.

Where possible, I’ve tried to hunt down the lowest prices available for each item, focusing on deals and limited-time discounts. Over the course of the week, I’ll be checking regularly to make sure prices stay accurate and all the products are still in stock.

The ongoing memory crunch does mean prices for some items remain higher than usual, particularly SSDs and other flash-based storage, and demand for high-capacity memory and storage continues to grow. Although deals still appear regularly, they don’t usually last long.

We’re also running our World Backup Day 2026 live blog with news, updates, and expert advice.

Internal SSDs

Portable SSDs

Desktop NAS

Software & cloud

​Cybersecurity firm F5 Networks has reclassified a BIG-IP APM denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability as a critical-severity remote code execution (RCE) flaw, warning that attackers are exploiting it to deploy webshells on unpatched devices.

BIG-IP APM (short for Access Policy Manager) is a centralized access management proxy solution that enables admins to secure and manage user access to their organizations’ networks, cloud, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs).

Tracked CVE-2025-53521, this security flaw can be exploited by attackers without privileges to perform remote code execution when targeting BIG-IP APM systems with access policies configured on a virtual server.

In addition to flagging the vulnerability as being exploited in the wild, F5 published indicators of compromise (IOCs) and advised defenders to check their BIG-IP systems’ disks, logs, and terminal history for signs of malicious activity.

“This known vulnerability was previously categorized and remediated as a Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability. Due to new information obtained in March 2026, the original vulnerability is being re-categorized to an RCE. The original CVE remediation has been validated to address the RCE in the fixed versions. We have learned that this vulnerability has been exploited in the vulnerable BIG-IP versions,” F5 warned in an advisory update published this Sunday.

“F5 strongly recommends that you consult your corporate security policy for guidelines about incident handling procedures including but not limited to forensic best practices, that are specific to your organization. More specifically, review the policies to ensure that they comply with evidence collection and forensics procedures for a security incident before you attempt to recover the system,” the company added.

Internet threat-monitoring non-profit organization Shadowserver now tracks over 240,000 BIG-IP instances exposed online; however, there is no information on how many have a vulnerable configuration or have already been secured against CVE-2025-53521 attacks.

​The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) also added the vulnerability to its list of actively exploited flaws on Friday and ordered federal agencies to secure their BIG-IP APM systems by midnight on Monday, March 30.

“This type of vulnerability is a frequent attack vector for malicious cyber actors and poses significant risks to the federal enterprise,” it warned.

“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

In recent years, BIG-IP vulnerabilities have been exploited by nation-state and cybercrime threat groups to breach corporate networks, map internal servers, deploy data-wiping malware, hijack devices, and steal sensitive documents from victims’ networks.

F5 is a Fortune 500 technology giant that provides cybersecurity, application delivery networking (ADN), and various other services to more than 23,000 customers worldwide, including 48 of the Fortune 50 companies.

Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.

This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.

Advertisement

Get Your Copy Now

Starcloud’s latest funding round values the space compute company at $1.1 billion, making it one of the fastest startups to reach unicorn status after graduating from Y Combinator.

The company’s Series A, which closed 17 months after its demo day presentation, was led by Benchmark and EQT Ventures. It’s another sign of the interest in outsourcing data centers to orbit as resource and political obstacles slow their development on Earth, but the business model depends on unproven technology and significant capital expenditure.

Starcloud has now raised a total of $200 million, and launched its first satellite with an Nvidia H100 GPU in November 2025. The company will launch a more powerful version, Starcloud 2, later this year with multiple GPUs, including an Nvidia Blackwell chip and an AWS server blade, as well as a bitcoin mining computer.

The company will also begin developing a data center spacecraft designed to launch from Starship, the reusable heavy lift rocket being built by Elon Musk’s SpaceX. Starcloud 3, as the spacecraft is named, will be a 200 kilowatts, three-ton spacecraft that fits the “pez dispenser” system SpaceX designed to deploy its Starlink satellites from Starship.

CEO and founder Philip Johnston said he expects that will be the first orbital data center that is cost-competitive with terrestrial data centers, with costs on the order of $.05 per kw/hour of power — if commercial launch costs land around $500 per kilogram.

The challenge is that Starship isn’t flying yet; Johnston says he expects commercial access to open up in 2028 and 2029. That’s the reality facing all the big space data center projects: powerful space computers will be cost-prohibitive until a new generation of rockets starts launching at a high operational cadence, something that might not happen until the 2030s.

“If it ends up being delayed, we’ll just carry on launching the smaller versions on Falcon 9,” Johnston said. “We’re not going to be competitive on energy costs until Starship is flying frequently.”

“There’s kind of two business models,” Johnston explains: One is selling processing power to other spacecraft on orbit; the company’s first satellite, for example, analyzes data collected by Capella Space’s radar spacecraft. Then, in the future when launch costs go down, more powerful distributed data centers could potentially pull work from their terrestrial counterparts.

That gets at how new this industry really is. When Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang unveiled the company’s Vera Rubin Space-1 chip modules at his company’s annual GPU Technology Conference last week, he didn’t note that none had been produced or shared with the company’s development partners. 

In fact, the number of advanced GPUs on orbit is numbered in the dozens, while Nvidia is estimated to have sold nearly 4 million to terrestrial hyperscalers in 2025. 

Or consider that SpaceX’s Starlink communications network, the largest satellite network in orbit with 10,000 spacecraft, produces something around 200 megawatts of energy, while data centers with more than 25 gigawatts of power are currently under construction in the U..S, according to Cushman and Wakefield. 

Johnston argues that his company is well ahead of the competition, with the first terrestrial GPU deployed in orbit. It was used to train an AI model in orbit, a first, according to Starcloud, and run a version of Gemini. Beyond the performance, Johnston says Starcloud now has valuable data about what it takes to run a powerful chip in space.

“An H100 is probably not the best chip for space, to be honest, but the reason we did it is we wanted to prove that we could run state of the art terrestrial chips in space,” he told TechCrunch. That hard-won knowledge —another GPU, an Nvidia A6000, failed during launch — will influence future designs.

There is a laundry list of technical challenges to be solved, including efficient power generation and cooling the hot-running chips. Starcloud-2 will have the largest deployable radiator flown on a private satellite; he expects at least two additional versions of that spacecraft will head to orbit, Johnston said.

Then there is the challenge of synchronization. The largest datacenter workloads, often for training, require hundreds or thousands of GPUs to work in tandem. Doing that in space will either require fantastically large spacecraft, or powerful and reliable laser links between spacecraft flying in formation. Most companies working on this technology expect those workloads to come long after simpler inference tasks take place on orbit.

Besides Starcloud, Aetherflux, Google’s Project Suncatcher, and Aethero — which launched Nvidia’s first space-based Jetson GPU in 2025 — are all developing space data center businesses. 

The elephant in the room is SpaceX itself, which has asked the U.S. government for permission to build and operate a million satellites for distributed compute in space.

Going head-to-head with SpaceX is a daunting task for any entrepreneur, but Johnston sees room for coexistence.

“They are building for a slightly different use case than us,” he told TechCrunch. “They’re mainly planning on serving Grok and Tesla workloads. It may be at some point that they offer a third party cloud service, but what I think they are unlikely to do is what we’re doing [as] an energy and infrastructure player.”

Reportedly, the crime group accessed more than 350GB of stolen data related to data dumps of mail servers, databases, confidential documents, contracts and other sensitive material.

The extortion group ShinyHunters has been linked to the recent (24 March) breach of the European Commission’s Europa.eu platform, in which a reported 350GB of data, across multiple databases, was accessed and stolen. 

In a statement issued after the incident (27 March), the European Commission stated that their early findings suggest that private data has been accessed and Union entities affected by the attack will be contacted. The Commission’s internal systems are not believed to have been affected.

The Commission explained it will continue to monitor the situation, taking the necessary precautions to ensure the security of its systems and data, as well as work to analyse what happened so it can use the results to improve its cybersecurity capabilities.

While the Commission has not shared further details on the incident, alleged data dumps uploaded to ShinyHunters’ Tor data leak site are said to include content from mail servers, internal communications systems, databases, confidential documents, contracts and additional sensitive material. 90GB of information allegedly stolen from the European Commission’s compromised cloud network has already been shared. 

ShinyHunters are an extortion group established around 2020, who have carried out a number of high-profile, financially-motivated attacks on groups such as Salesforce, Allianz Life, SoundCloud and Ticketmaster. The criminal organisation also claimed responsibility for an attack on Match Group, which owns Tinder, Hinge, Meetic, Match.com and OkCupid. 

In July 2024, AT&T paid a member of the ShinyHunters hacking group $370,000 to delete the data of millions of customers following a massive data breach of its systems. Reportedly, the stolen data exposed the calls and texts of nearly all of the platform’s 110m cellular customers after ShinyHunters stole the information from the cloud data giant Snowflake.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment about the meetings, but an official who was not authorized to speak on the record, told WIRED at the time: “The White House does not comment on mysterious meetings with unnamed staffers.”

Simultaneously, Trump has also sought to absolve officials of any wrongdoing in the wake of the 2020 election. Last year, Trump gave “full, complete and unconditional” pardons to a slate of people who had tried, and failed, to help him overturn the 2020 election results. In recent months, Trump has pressured Colorado governor Jared Polis to release Tina Peters, the former county clerk in Mesa County, Colorado, who became a hero for the right’s election deniers when she facilitated a security breach during a software update of her county’s election management system.

Peters was found guilty of four felonies, but Trump has been mounting a campaign in recent months to get her released, even going so far as to say he “pardoned” her, even though he has no power to do so given she was convicted on state charges.

Election Day Interference

While Trump has not announced specific plans to deploy troops to polling locations or seize voting machines, he and his administration have certainly been suggesting that such action is not off the table.

In January, Trump lamented not having the National Guard seize certain voting machines after the 2020 election. In early February, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that while she hasn’t specifically heard Trump discussing the possibility, she couldn’t “guarantee that an ICE agent won’t be around a polling location in November.” (The question was in response to former White House adviser Steve Bannon stating: “We’re going to have ICE surround the polls come November. We’re not going to sit here and allow you to steal the country again … We will never again allow an election to be stolen.”)

Earlier this month, during his confirmation hearing to head up the Department of Homeland Security, Senator Markwayne Mullin said he would be willing to deploy ICE to polling locations to address “a specific threat.”

The result of the Trump administration’s drip feed of threats and dog whistles is that those who are running elections in states across the country are already war-gaming what happens if ICE or the National Guard show up at their voting locations.

Michael McNulty, the policy director at Issue One, a nonprofit that tracks the impact of money in politics, also points to the fact that the Department of Justice sent monitors to oversee elections in November in New Jersey and California, despite no federal elections being held. “The concern is that this could become a massive deployment of, quote unquote, observers by the DOJ in 2026 who might do something more, whether it’s intimidation, whether it’s interfering with local election officials, to get data to confirm conspiracy theories,” McNulty tells WIRED.

FBI Raids

On January 28, the FBI raided the election office in Fulton County, Georgia, executing a search warrant that allowed it to seize ballots, ballot images, tabulator tapes, and the voter rolls related to the 2020 election. The search warrant affidavit, unsealed a few weeks ago, shows that the FBI relied on the work of Kurt Olsen, a lawyer who was appointed by the administration to investigate election security in October and who has a long history of working with some of the country’s biggest election deniers, including Patrick Byrne, Mike Lindell, and Kari Lake. Olsen’s claims are based on debunked and previously investigated conspiracy theories about the 2020 election.

The raid was also notable for the presence of Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, who is, according to The Guardian, running a parallel investigation into the 2020 election with the apparent tacit approval of Trump.