from the fighting-works dept

It was just a week or so ago that we were talking about the absurd situation in Knox County, Tennessee, where local government used Tennessee’s book-banning laws to remove the book Roots from school libraries. Yes, this is the book by Alex Haley that spawned the 1970s miniseries of the same name and served as a cultural touchpoint for the understanding of American history and race relations across the country. Haley lived in Knox County himself. He even has a bronze statue placed in his honor in Morningside Park in Knoxville. Yet the book that earned him that statue was being banned in public schools.

The backlash to this occurring was swift and severe. It came from both local politicians and from the public around the country. The purity of just how bad and wrong this was hit a nerve. And, now, the county has caved to that pressure and have immediately reinstated Roots back onto public school bookshelves.

Knox County Schools Superintendent Jon Rysewyk said the district will return the 1976 novel to school library shelves, walking back a decision that had added Roots to a growing list of banned books and ignited debate about race, history and the reach of state law into public school libraries.

In a memo to the Knox County Board of Education dated May 26, 2026, Rysewyk said the decision to return Roots to shelves was effective immediately and that the initial removal “was in no way a commentary on the historical, cultural, or literary value of the novel.

And that’s bullshit, of course. Many of the other quotes from Rysewyk are very carefully lawyered, but this one stands out as obvious nonsense. Removing a book, any book, from school shelves is absolutely a commentary on the historical, cultural, and literary value of that book. You’re making a decision to hide away a literary work from children. If the work had value to those children, you wouldn’t be banning it.

Rysewyk goes on to note that he consulted with many lawyers on the passage that led to the book being banned and that there was no consensus whether that passage actually violated Tennessee’s law or not and that that’s why he reinstated it. Then he dropped this gem.

“Removing any book from circulation is, and should be, an immense decision. Our intent will always be to err on the side of access, which is the decision I have made with regard to “Roots,”” Rysewyk said.

No. No it won’t. Because last week was part of “always” and the initial decision was to err on the side of not pissing off racist goobers and removing access. Nice try, though. It was only when the revolt started coming from within the school board itself that Rysewyk was forced to walk this all back.

Knox County School board member Katherine Bike sent a memo to her colleagues demanding the book’s return. 

“Removing Roots is not a neutral act,” Bike wrote. “It sends a message to our students, particularly our Black students, about whose history is worth protecting. I don’t believe that is the message any of us intends to send. Intent and impact are two different things.” 

On Tuesday after the reversal was announced, State Rep. Sam McKenzie, whose district includes the Haley statue, called the ban a grave injustice and said he was disappointed but not surprised. 

Advertisement

“’Roots’ won a Pulitzer Prize and became a cultural touchstone that inspired and united millions of Americans,” McKenzie said. “I knew that taking it out of the hands of thousands of schoolchildren in Knox County would be a grave injustice.”

Now, what this should immediately result in is a recognition that public backlash can reverse bad policy. There are over 120 other books that are currently on the Knox County banned book list, not to mention similar anti-literature lists from the state’s other counties. Every one of them should get similar backlash. Banning Roots failed to work because of the name recognition of the book, the local interest in its author, and its obvious value to children. I have no reason to believe that there aren’t plenty of other works of literature in the other 120-plus books on the list worthy of defending.

That’s where the work actually needs to be done, now. Because the only thing we should be banning is the banning of books.

Filed Under: alex haley, book bans, culture, knox county, knox county schools, roots, tennessee

A security lead at a large enterprise* told me last week, when I asked whether they had any interest in Grok: “The revenge porn edgelord LLM? Yeah, imagine that; our bank wants nothing to do with it.”

A couple of other people I put the question to seemed genuinely surprised I’d brought it up at all, the way you’d react if someone wandered into a board meeting and asked whether anyone wanted to expense a timeshare.

So that’s the current state of enterprise demand for Grok, as measured by the unscientific but reliable method of asking the people who actually sign the cloud contracts. It lands somewhere between “no” and “why would you ask me that?”

Which is awkward, because Business Insider reported this week that AWS is “in talks” to add SpaceX’s Grok models to Bedrock, joining Anthropic, Meta, Cohere, and the OpenAI models AWS is in the process of bolting on. SpaceX has reportedly already shipped the models to AWS. There’s no launch date, which in AWS announcement terms puts us squarely at the “intention to perhaps one day announce an announcement” stage.

But is it any good? (No)

Let me dispatch the obvious objection: maybe nobody wants Grok because they haven’t tried it, and it’s secretly excellent. I’ve run blind tests of the frontier models on some of my own deeply stupid side projects—the shitposting.ai family, where the entire design goal is to be edgier and weirder than the current discourse will tolerate. If there’s a use case purpose-built to let Grok flex its whole “we say the things others won’t” positioning, it’s mine.

Grok loses. It’s fast — legitimately, impressively fast — but it’s just not as good. It’s the energy drink of frontier models: it’ll keep you up, but you won’t enjoy the experience and you’ll regret it in the morning.

So we’ve got a model that enterprise buyers actively don’t want, that underperforms even on the single axis it’s purportedly optimized for, attached to a company whose image generator reportedly was used to produce roughly three million sexualized images of real people over an eleven-day stretch, including an estimated 23,000 depicting apparent minors, according to the Center for Countering Digital Hate, triggering regulatory action in more than a dozen jurisdictions and a Dutch court injunction carrying a €100,000-per-day penalty. That part isn’t a joke, and I’m not going to make one.

Then layer on the fact that nobody sensible wants to take a hard dependency on Elon Musk’s org chart. In roughly a year, the thing has been reorganized into oblivion — X (the rebranded Twitter) sold to Grok-producing xAI, xAI swallowed by SpaceX, with the whole AI unit then being dissolved into a division called SpaceXAI. All eleven original cofounders have left. More than fifty researchers walked after the SpaceX absorption. The API endpoint you’d integrate against, api.x.ai, is migrating to a SpaceX-branded URL on a timeline nobody’s published. Building production infrastructure on top of that is like renting an apartment in a building that keeps changing its name, its address, its compliance with the fire code, and its landlord while you’re still unpacking.

And here’s the part that should bother whoever greenlit this. Bedrock’s entire pitch— the reason anyone pays the wrapper tax instead of hitting a model’s API directly— is governance: IAM, PrivateLink, CloudTrail, encryption, guardrails, and an audit trail you can wave at a regulator. The model is almost secondary to those things for those customers. And the enterprises that actively value that stack are precisely the ones telling me they wouldn’t touch Grok with a borrowed keyboard.

The startups that hypothetically *do* want Grok — for the edge, for the speed, for whatever a founder talks themselves into at 2 a.m. — could not care less about CloudTrail. They want it cheap, fast, and now, and they can already have it: Grok is one curl to a public endpoint away, same as every other model on the shelf. Bedrock has no monopoly on third-party models; it never did. So sketch the Venn diagram. One circle is “wants Grok,” the other is “wants Bedrock’s governance.” Grok-on-Bedrock is built to serve only the gap where they don’t overlap.

So who asked for this?

Nobody. Which is the interesting part.

When customer demand can’t explain a decision, follow the corpdev. And AWS has run this exact play twice already this year, in public, with the numbers attached.

With Anthropic: a commitment to spend more than $100 billion on AWS over ten years and secure up to five gigawatts of Trainium capacity, with Amazon putting in another $5 billion immediately and up to $20 billion more on milestones — on top of the $8 billion it had already sunk in, for a cumulative stake somewhere around $33 billion.

With OpenAI: an existing $38 billion agreement expanded by another $100 billion, OpenAI committing to roughly two gigawatts of Trainium, and Amazon writing a $50 billion check on top.

The pattern is identical both times. Amazon invests, the lab commits to gigawatts of Trainium, and the model shows up on Bedrock as the consumer-facing bow on top. The Bedrock listing is the gift wrap. The Trainium commitment is the gift.

So here’s the way I’m thinking about it: AWS isn’t trying to sell Grok to your bank, but rather trying to sell Trainium to SpaceXAI — a company currently training Grok on something like 550,000 Nvidia GPUs in a Memphis facility the size of the chip on my shoulder. Peel even a fraction of that onto Amazon silicon ahead of the SpaceX IPO and the deal pencils out, regardless of whether a single human ever calls the Grok endpoint in anger. Bedrock becomes little more than a sales funnel with infuriatingly bad documentation.

The part where I say something nice

Because the strategy is clever, and I try to say so when it’s earned. Amazon is now bankrolling both leading independent AI labs at once, on its own chips, through its own model marketplace, while positioning itself as neutral infrastructure for whoever ends up winning. Against the roughly $200 billion in capex Amazon is torching in 2026, getting frontier labs to pre-commit to the silicon is about the only thing that makes that spreadsheet survivable. It worked twice. Why not go for three?

The third just happens to be a satellite-internet competitor. Amazon Leo – Amazon’s own years-later answer to Starlink – is out there signing Delta, JetBlue, AT&T, Vodafone, and NASA. So AWS would be cutting a relationship check to the one company it’s simultaneously trying to chase out of low Earth orbit. This seems fine. This is normal! Everybody in this industry is everybody else’s landlord, tenant, competitor, and shelf-mate, frequently within the same quarter and occasionally within the same press release. There will never be a problem that this arrangement causes.

The caveat that keeps me honest

I have no inside information here past “casual conversations with enterprise execs.” I haven’t seen a term sheet. There’s no public Trainium commitment from SpaceXAI, and Colossus runs on Nvidia today. So I can’t prove this is silicon corpdev rather than, say, AWS executives wanting a seat at the IPO table, or a marketing org that needs to put “every frontier model” on a slide. What I can tell you is that customer demand doesn’t explain it, because there isn’t any – and AWS has shown you, twice and with receipts, what its other explanation tends to look like.

So when Grok eventually lands on Bedrock with no fanfare and no launch date, and then is never mentioned again, don’t read it as AWS believing you want Grok. Read the S-1. If there’s a Trainium number in it, you’ll know what the model was really for.

* Specifics have been fuzzed to protect confidentiality. ®

The only Father’s Day gift I can recall my own dad getting was a plate of fried sardines. It was prepared by my mother, his ex-wife, who knew how gratefully he’d receive a dish he grew up with in the Italian neighborhood of a steel town dying with such theatrical flair that Bruce Springsteen named a song after it. (An acoustic Springsteen song, at that.) We lived in a nearby city that had plenty of red-sauce restaurants, but they weren’t serving tinned fish in those days. As my father had only the most limited of food preparation skills and didn’t date the kind of women who could cook, this was the only way he’d ever taste that flavor again.

As Father’s Day gifts go, being united with a long-lost recipe from childhood is pretty good. If you can pull it off, that’s what you should give your dad this year. Otherwise, I have here a few ideas I’ve spent the last few months gathering for various types of dads and across many different budgets. With the exception of a few things picked by other dads on the team, these are all things I’ve personally tested and approved, and I hope they make your dad as happy as those sardines made mine.

The Best Father’s Day Gifts for Your Dad

The World’s Best Squirt Gun

Spyra SpyraFour Electric Water Blaster

Read more

The World’s Best Flying Disc

Aerobie Pro Ring

Advertisement

Read more

The Best Bocce Set I’ve Used

St. Pierre Tournament Bocce Set

Read more

A Premium Hibachi Grill

Mibrasa Hibachi MH 300 PLUS

Read more

For the Dad Who Plays With His Kids

Maybe your dad has fond memories of the Super Soakers of his youth, but the SpyraFour is the new best water gun ever made. WIRED has been covering the German brand’s powerful electric squirt guns since 2023, and they’ve only gotten better over time. Just ask my daughter, who has to use the SpyraThree while I blast away at her with this gun that refills much faster (it sucks up enough water for about 20 shots in a cool 12 seconds) and has a full digital smart display to select between shooting styles and show you how much ammo you’ve got left. This is a very powerful squirt gun that shoots accurately up to 50 feet, and it’s recommended for kids who are at least 14. I can confirm that when I let my 11-year-old and her friends play with it, the battle often ends in tears. This only adds to the appeal as a gift for any dad over 40—when I was her age, we threw rocks at each other, and I had to go to the emergency room to get stitches you can still see. Good times.

For the Grill Dad

Photograph: Martin Cizmar

Mibrasa

Hibachi MH 300 PLUS

Advertisement

Live-fire cooking has been the hottest trend in grilling for half a decade now, possibly as a reaction to the rise of super-automated pellet grills and high-tech smart grilling. The latest up-and-coming device is the charcoal oven, which Spanish brand Mibrasa is best known for (the smallest model, the Nano, runs just under $12,000). That would be an amazing gift for your dad if the budget allows. However, those of more modest means can confidently gift this super-premium hibachi grill from Mibrasa, which is made of heavy-gauge steel.

The MH 300 Plus is roughly one square foot and weighs about 18 pounds empty—you can carry it around, but it’s a little on the hefty side. It gets scorching hot (almost 500 degrees Fahrenheit) and holds the meat very near to the charcoal so that the drippings are vaporized and turned into flavorful smoke. I’ve made steak tacos and chicken skewers, and they’ve turned out perfectly with a kiss of char. When I refresh this guide in a few weeks, I will have used it to test the Snake River Farms Wagyu beef gift box that just arrived, which looks like it will also appear on this list soon.

For the Beach Dad/Pool Dad

This is one of the few products on this list that I have not personally tested, but for a dad with a pool, it’s such a good gift idea that I had to include it. Our reviewer gave the Sora, which sits in the middle of the Beatbot lineup, a stellar 8/10 review, saying it’ll clean up the debris from pretty much any mess short of a hurricane. This 20-pound robot crawls the walls of your pool, suctioning up grime and saving dad the hassle of skimming for an hour every week.

For the Car Dad

Portable tire inflators and jump starters are both great things to have, and I have both. The AX65 from Noco is a high-powered combination of the two, and the best version of either I’ve encountered. The tire inflator is extremely quick, as fast as a gas station air compressor in my testing, and advertises it’ll take a tire from flat to 40 psi in two minutes. It holds 2,150 amp hours of power, enough to jump a regular passenger car multiple times. It jumped my Dieselgate-era Jetta with ease (I’ve had the device for a month and already needed to jump my car thanks to its lack of alarm when you leave the lights on). It’ll also recharge a phone or laptop via a 60-watt USB-C port, so it’s not just taking up dead space on road trips until disaster strikes.

For the Yard Dad

My childhood neighbor Don Elmerick had the finest lawn I’ve ever seen. Elmerick, who lived across the street from my mother’s house for nearly 50 years before he passed in 2019, spent every summer meticulously tending to his acre of bright green grass, getting tan while mowing shirtless in jeans. His lawn was so nice that, as legend had it, the groundskeepers from the modest public golf course behind our house would come by to admire it. Every dad I know, including myself, would love to have a lawn like that. Unfortunately, I do not have the spare 10 to 20 hours a week it takes to do the research and labor required.

I won’t say that the Lawnbrite plan has my more modest patch of lawn looking like Firestone Country Club after six months of treatment, but it does look better than any lawn I’ve kept in my adult life. That’s thanks to this service, which uses data from your lawn to create a custom treatment plan and then sends different treatment bottles at strategic times. All you do is open the box, attach the bottle to a hose, and spray. I applied the Green Machine formula in the fall and then Weed Wipeout in the spring. If your dad is always talking about how nice another man’s grass looks, this is the gift for him.

If you’re of a certain vintage, you have probably looked at some of the microcomputers on the market these days and thought “that would have been a decent workstation back in the day!”. We certianly have, and so did [Roberto Alsina]. Rather than allow himself to contemplate his age and threfore rapidly approaching mortailty, [Roberto] wrote a useful operating system called ESP-Osito for the Cheap Yellow Display, which he refers to as “the cheapest computer”. He’s not wrong, and it’s certainly a better use of time than an existential crisis.

He explains some of his reasoning behind the project in an accompanying blog post, but on the project page he compares it to a Palm Pilot– it’s on quick, apps load quick, and the API is simple enough for easy app creation in a few hundred lines of C, unlike certain pocket computers we won’t name. Sure, there’s no multitasking, but when apps jump from SD card to run in memory in microseconds, who cares? Saving the current state of the app back to SD means the experience is virtually identical from a user perspective anyway.

As this is a one-man show for now, the app store won’t quite rival your smart phone– but there’s everything you’d expect on the 90s-era computer this has the horsepower of: a serial terminal, a text editor, a file explorer, a calculator, a clock, but also some things that aren’t so retro. The clock app gives weather info via futuristic wireless networking, the reader app takes Markdown text, and the chat app connects to an LLM somewhere instead of your friends on IRC. The blackberry keyboard option gives it a feel of a slightly different vintage. You can also play snake, because no computer is complete without games. The OS and all its applications are released under the MIT license on GitHub, and [Roberto] is actively looking for collaborators.

If you doubt the workstation comparison at the start of this article, this CYD runs Macintosh System 3 via a 68k emulator. That’s got old-school cred, but there’s something great about having retro constraints with modern code on modern hardware. In that way, ESP-Osito is similar to the 3D graphics engine behind this Wipeout clone.

A recent Indian court ruling against Google’s keyword advertising practices has gained fresh attention after founders said competitors have long used the system to siphon off customers and force companies to pay to protect their own brands.

The ruling, delivered by the Delhi High Court on May 22 in a trademark dispute involving bathroom fittings maker Hindware, found Google liable for trademark infringement over its keyword advertising practices and awarded the company ₹3 million (around $31,600) in nominal damages.

In her 163-page judgment (PDF), Justice Mini Pushkarna rejected Google’s argument that it was merely a passive intermediary in serving ads on its search platform. The judge said Google, through its AdWords platform, allowed Hindware’s rivals to use “Hindware” as a keyword to target users searching for the brand.

“Google by selling the trademark of the plaintiff [Hindware] as a keyword without any authorization for commercial gains is infringing the plaintiff’s right to exclusive use of its trademark under Section 28 of the Trade Marks Act,” the judge said.

The judgment drew attention on Friday after Indian entrepreneurs, including Zerodha founder Nithin Kamath and Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu, publicly backed the ruling, arguing that competitors have long used Google’s advertising tools to divert traffic from established brands and force companies to spend money protecting their own names.

Kamath, who said Zerodha had faced the issue for more than a decade, wrote on X: “Whenever someone searches for ‘Zerodha,’ the traffic should rightfully come to Zerodha. But what often happens is that the first couple of results on Google Search are ads, leading the customer to a competitor’s website.”

Google, for its part, said its Ads policy on trademark keywords “does not allow competitor advertisers to use trademarked terms in the ad-text of an ad” and that the policy is applied globally.

“We look forward to continuing to align our operations with local legal frameworks while maintaining strict standards to protect our users’ long-term interests,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement to TechCrunch.

India is a key market for Google, with more internet users than any country other than China, making court decisions affecting its search and advertising businesses particularly significant.

Legal experts, however, said the implications of the ruling may be narrower than some of the public reaction suggests.

“The judgment per se will require platforms to relook at their processes to see if their automated tools encourage or offer trademarked terms to advertisers at large,” said Aprajita Rana, a partner at AZB & Partners.

Nonetheless, Rana told TechCrunch that the decision does not have a “far-reaching impact” on online platforms’ liability in India, as courts have already established that internet companies can lose legal protections when they play an active role in unlawful activity.

“What’s important in this case is how providing access to trademarked terms, even in ad curation that’s between online platforms and advertisers and not known to customers, can amount to a participative activity for platforms,” Rana said.