Tech
Thinborne Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Case Review: Is It Better Than Samsung’s Slim Magnet Case?
Samsung already has its own slim magnetic case for the Galaxy S26 Ultra, so most people won’t think twice about alternatives.
But choosing the right Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra case isn’t always as straightforward as it seems. Some cases look great on day one but end up feeling too smooth, slightly bulky, or just awkward to use after a few days. Thinborne is still a thin magnetic case, but it takes a slightly different approach.
This review focuses on how it feels in real use, and how it compares to Samsung’s own option.
Thinborne Overview of Features
It helps to look at what Thinborne actually offers and how those features translate in real use.
Material and Build
Thinborne uses 600D aramid fiber, which you’ll usually see in lightweight, high-strength materials. You’ll notice how it feels:
- It’s very light
- It feels firm rather than flexible
- The surface has a subtle texture
At 0.90 mm thin, it doesn’t add much bulk. The phone still feels close to how it does without a case.
What makes it different from typical cases is the structure. It doesn’t have that soft, slightly rubbery feel you get from silicone. It’s more rigid, almost like a thin shell that snaps into place. Over time, silicone can start to feel sticky or collect dust – this doesn’t.

MagSafe Compatibility
Like most Galaxy S26 Ultra cases, Thinborne includes built-in magnets since the phone itself doesn’t have them. In everyday use, that means:
- Chargers snap into place quickly
- Car mounts hold steady
- Wallets and stands attach cleanly
The experience is straightforward, and everything lines up as expected (and it stays in place).
One thing that helps with the setup is the case’s rigidity. Since it doesn’t flex much, the alignment stays consistent. You don’t get that slight shift you sometimes notice with softer cases.

Available Colors
Thinborne keeps the color options simple:
- Black
- Royal Crimson
- Wild Navy
All three use the same woven finish, so the feel doesn’t change – only the color does. The tones are muted and don’t draw too much attention.
Thinborne Thin Phone Case vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Slim Magnet Case
Samsung’s Slim Magnet Case is the most direct comparison. Both cases fall into the same general category: thin, lightweight, and magnetic.
Samsung doesn’t list an exact thickness, but it’s positioned as a slim case. What we do know is that it weighs 24 grams, making it a bit heavier than Thinborne, which weighs around 20 grams.
Here’s how they compare:
Feature
Thinborne Galaxy S26 Ultra Case
Samsung Slim Magnet Case
Weight
20 g
24 g
Thickness
0.90 mm
slim profile (not officially listed)
Material
600D aramid fiber
Synthetic/plastic
Grip
Textured (woven)
Smooth
Magnets
Built-in magnetic array
Built-in magnets
As you can see, Thinborne and Samsung look similar. In use, however, the differences can be noticed:
- Grip – Thinborne has a bit more texture, so it feels more secure in your hand. Samsung’s case is smoother, which can feel slightly slippery.
- Weight – The difference isn’t huge, but the lighter feel can be noticeable over time – especially on a large phone like the S26 Ultra.
- Material feel – Thinborne feels more solid and structured. Samsung’s case feels more like a standard slim case.
Pricing and Availability
Thinborne and Samsung are priced almost the same, so cost isn’t really the deciding factor here.
Thinborne comes in at $69.69, while Samsung’s Slim Magnet Case is slightly higher at $69.99. The difference is minimal, and in practice, both sit in the same premium range for thin magnetic cases.
Where they differ is availability. Thinborne is sold through its official website and is also available on Amazon, which gives you a bit more flexibility when buying. It typically includes extras like a tempered glass screen protector as well.
Samsung’s case is easier to find overall. It’s available through Samsung’s store and most major retailers, making it a more convenient option if you prefer to buy locally or through familiar channels.
At this price point, it really comes down to which case fits your preferences better, not which one is cheaper.
Wrap Up
Thinborne keeps things simple, and that’s really the point. It’s built as a thin phone case that doesn’t change how the Galaxy S26 Ultra feels in your hand. The lighter weight, subtle texture, and rigid build all come together in a way that feels easy to live with day to day.
Samsung’s Slim Magnet Case still does what it’s supposed to. It’s reliable, widely available, and works well with magnetic accessories. But if you care about how your phone actually feels in use, Thinborne has a clear edge. The lighter weight and textured finish make it easier to hold, especially during one-handed use – something you start to notice after a few days of use.
Tech
Threads introduces ‘live chats’ for following live events
Meta has introduced a new “live chats” feature to Threads, enabling people on the platform to participate in real-time conversations about live events they’re interested in. Live chats can be hosted within Threads communities, the topic-specific social spaces that Meta last year.
The new feature sounds a bit like Threads’ take on Instagram’s broadcast channels, but the latter only allows for one-way messaging. Live chats can be hosted by select creators, including Community Champions — users highly engaged within specific communities — and media personalities. Once a chat is launched or scheduled, the host chooses who is invited to contribute and can then share the link publicly.
You can post photos, videos, links and emoji reactions as well as text-based messages. If you’re unable to send messages in a live chat that is at capacity, you can still watch it, react to others messages and vote in polls. Live chats remain open to view after they’ve ended, and you don’t need to be part of a community to join.
Meta is debuting its new social feature in the NBAThreads Community during the Playoffs, with Malika Andrews, Rachel Nichols, Trysta Krick, David Rushing and Lexis Mickens named as hosts. Live chats will appear at the top of the NBAThreads Community feed, and can also be shared in a post that might appear on your main feed in Threads. You’ll also see a red ring around a host’s profile photo when they’re live.
Meta says live chats will gradually be rolled out to more communities on Threads, with features like co-hosting, lock screen widgets and the ability to quote and share messages from a chat on your feed coming soon.
Meta has been steadily expanding its X rival’s features since it launched in 2023. It started small with (note: not hashtags) and , before rolling out communities last year. It also started long-form text posts and just gave Threads a long-overdue facelift on web. Back in October, the company that its text-based social media platform now has 150 million daily users.
Tech
New York Bans Government Employees from Insider Trading on Prediction Markets
New York has banned state employees from using insider information to trade on prediction markets. In an executive order signed today and viewed by WIRED, Governor Kathy Hochul forbade the state’s government workforce from using “any nonpublic information obtained in the course of their official duties” to participate on prediction market platforms, or to help others profit using those services.
“Getting rich by betting on inside information is corruption, plain and simple,” Hochul said in a statement provided to WIRED. “Our actions will ensure that public servants work for the people they represent, not their own personal enrichment. While Donald Trump and DC Republicans turn a blind eye to the ethical Wild West they’ve created, New York is stepping up to lead by example and stamp out insider trading.”
The order was not spurred by any specific insider trading incidents involving New York state employees. “There are no known instances of this behavior to date,” says New York State Executive Chamber deputy communications director Sean Butler.
This is the latest in a wave of initiatives meant to curb insider trading on prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket, the two most popular of these platforms in the United States. California Governor Gavin Newsom issued a similar executive order last month, banning Golden State employees from prediction market insider trading. Yesterday, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker followed suit.
In addition to these executive orders, Congress has also introduced several bills intended to curb market manipulation and corruption in the industry, including legislation barring elected officials from participating in prediction markets. Some individual politicians are discouraging or outright barring their staff from buying event contracts on those platforms. According to CNN, the White House recently warned executive branch staff not to trade on prediction markets. When WIRED asked the White House about its policies on these markets earlier this year, it pointed to existing regulations prohibiting gambling activity but did not respond to requests for clarification on whether it considered prediction market participation to be gambling.
The Commodity Exchange Act, which covers derivative markets, does already prohibit insider trading, which means that both public servants and people in the private sector are breaking the law if they enact insider trades on event contracts. Rather than establishing new rules, the New York executive order serves primarily to underline the state’s commitment to enforcing existing laws and to clarify how these laws and its Code of Ethics for employees apply to prediction markets.
However, with so many high-profile examples of suspected insider trading on Polymarket focused on geopolitical events, from the capture of former Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro to strikes in the ongoing Iran war, many onlookers—including prominent lawmakers—see this as such a combustible issue. They’re racing to write laws and orders restating and emphasizing existing rules.
“This makes sense, and we already do this. At Kalshi, insider trading violates our rules, and we enforce them when we catch insiders,” Kalshi spokesperson Elisabeth Diana says. “Government employees should be aware that trading on federally regulated markets using material nonpublic information violates the law.” (Polymarket did not immediately respond to a request for comment.)
Facing backlash, Polymarket and Kalshi have recently announced new initiatives to combat insider trading.
In February, Kalshi publicized its decision to suspend and fine two individuals for violating its market manipulation policies; the company also confirmed that it had flagged the cases to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the federal agency overseeing prediction markets. In March, it rolled out a beef up market surveillance arm, preemptively blocking political candidates from trading on markets related to their campaigns.
Tech
Minnesota Lawmakers Tried To Ban Classic Cars On Weekdays: Here’s How It Ended
Some people might look at cars — and the automotive hobby itself — as an escape from the constant political debates and arguments that seem to be everywhere in modern life. However, the reality is that politics are often heavily tied to both the industry itself and cars as a hobby.
Mandates, laws, and regulations related to safety systems, fuel economy standards, fuel types, and even a vehicle’s country of origin have all been part of federal politics in the past, and will likely feature in the future, too. Likewise, hobbyists and classic car owners sometimes need to argue their cases to state governments to protect or expand their hobby. For example, Jay Leno has been leading an effort in California since 2025 to have the state amend some of the notoriously restrictive smog laws that make classic car ownership difficult and expensive.
The Golden State, however, is not the only place where classic car owners face restrictions. In Minnesota, a new bill aimed to limit the use of classic cars registered with the state’s collector plates — including potentially prohibiting owners from driving them on weekdays or at night. Naturally, this has caught the attention not just of classic car owners in Minnesota, but of observers nationwide. Thankfully for Minnesotans, however, the bill looks to have stalled out before getting to a vote.
One state with many plates
While it’s entirely possible — and potentially very enjoyable — to have a classic car as a daily driver, there are lots of pros and cons of daily driving a vintage vehicle, not least the cost of ownership. Minnesota, however, offers drivers some help here, with a few different collector plate options available depending on a vehicle’s age, all of which exempt the owner from annual registration fees. At the very least, Minnesota collector plates require a car to be at least 20 years old and for the owner to have another vehicle with standard plates. As stated in the current law, owners are also not to use cars with collector plates for daily transportation.
The new bill, HF3865, wanted to tighten these restrictions so that collector-plated vehicles could only be operated during daylight hours on Saturdays and Sundays, or specifically during collector club activities or parades. Now, the amendment might be understandable on the surface if its purpose was to clarify what does or doesn’t constitute daily transportation. It could also be useful if there were concerns over vehicle owners abusing the privileges that come with the plates. But some classic car owners fear it represents a significant encroachment on the hobby and could be a gateway for additional laws in the future.
The worst likely won’t come to pass
The bill’s wording would mark a huge departure from Minnesota’s current law, theoretically making it illegal to take a collector-plated car out for a casual Friday evening cruise or a Tuesday afternoon test run after replacing a part. The issue, of course, is that both scenarios are pretty common for classic car owners, especially those who spend their weekdays wrenching. More broadly, though, the concern is also less about the specifics of this one bill. Instead, it’s the seeming trend of lawmakers scrutinizing and attempting to legislate classic car and auto enthusiast hobbies that has this bill in the headlines.
Fortunately for classic car owners in Minnesota, the bill may not become law, as it has been stuck in Committee since early March, 2026. Opponents of the bill are likely hoping that lawmakers get caught up with more pressing matters than limiting which days classic car owners can drive their vehicles, causing HF3865 to sputter out before a vote. There are already many things to consider before buying a classic car, and on top of all the other expenses that come with the hobby, having strict rules on use are something most vintage car owners would prefer not to deal with — regardless of which state they live in.
Tech
CATL says its new EV battery can recharge from 10% to 98% in six minutes
![]()
CATL recently unveiled its new battery technology, promising improvements in some of the most difficult tradeoffs in EV performance. Its third generation Shenxing battery can be recharged almost fully in around six minutes, while also maintaining stronger efficiency in low temperatures and harsh weather.
Read Entire Article
Source link
Tech
2026 LG evo W6 Wallpaper TVs Arrive With $1,000 Premium
Following our hands-on coverage at CES 2026, where LG Electronics showed just how far it could push OLED design, the company has now confirmed pricing and availability for the 2026 OLED evo W6 Wallpaper TV series.
The W6 does not just lean into the wallpaper concept, it fully commits to it. These panels are incredibly thin to the point where they almost disappear once mounted, turning the display into something that feels more like part of the wall than a traditional television. Now available for pre-order in 77-inch ($5,499.99) and 83-inch ($7,499.99) sizes – that is $1,000 more than LG’s G6 Series OLED evo AI 77 and 83-inch TV prices. The W6 moves from CES showpiece to something you can actually bring home, assuming your wall and your budget are ready for it.
Here is what the LG OLED evo W6 series offers.
Wallpaper Design

The defining feature of the W6 series is its ultra thin Wallpaper design. The LG OLED evo W6 is built to sit nearly flush against the wall with a roughly 9 mm class profile and a mounting system designed to minimize any visible gap. The goal is straightforward. Once installed, it looks less like a television and more like part of the wall itself.
Zero Connect Box

To support the Wallpaper design, all physical connections except the power cable are handled by LG’s Zero Connect Box. This external hub manages both wired and wireless sources and transmits 4K video and audio to the display from up to 32 feet away.
The result is a cleaner installation. The LG OLED evo W6 can sit flush on the wall without the usual tangle of cables pulling it back into reality, which is the whole point of the design.
OLED Performance
The OLED evo W6 incorporates LG’s RGB Tandem OLED panel with additional support from LG’s Alpha 11 AI Processor Gen3, which delivers advanced picture and sound optimization through AI-driven processing, including Hyper Radiant Color Technology. This elevates brightness, color accuracy, and contrast across a wide range of lighting conditions. With Brightness Booster Ultra, the W6 achieves luminance levels up to 3.9 times brighter than conventional OLED displays.
Reflection Handling, Black Levels, and Color Performance

The LG OLED evo W6 adds some real substance behind the design. It carries an industry first Reflection Free Premium certification aimed at reducing glare and reflections in brighter rooms, which has always been a weak spot for OLED in everyday spaces.
LG also leans on its Perfect Black and Perfect Color claims, both verified by UL Solutions. In practice, that translates to consistent black levels and stable color performance regardless of ambient light. The benefit is not subtle. Better contrast, more accurate color, and a picture that holds together whether you are watching during the day or at night.
Premium Gaming Support
Meeting the needs of gamers has become a very important selling point for TVs, and the LG OLED evo W6 Wallpaper TVs fill the fill. The W6 supports 4K resolution at up to 165Hz with variable refresh rate (VRR) technology, NVIDIA G-SYNC compatibility, and AMD FreeSync Premium. These features are designed to support ultra-smooth, high-bandwidth gameplay with minimal lag, making the W6 a capable display for competitive gaming as well as cinematic viewing.
webOS Platform

The W6 incorporates LG’s latest version of its webOS platform to provide personalized user experiences through AI-powered features, including Voice ID, Multi-AI integration, and an upgraded AI Concierge for intuitive content discovery and navigation. In addition, LG Channels is also included – providing lots of free ad-supported content.
LG Gallery+
New for 2026, Gallery+ transforms the W6 into an art display when not viewing TV or gaming. Gallery+ allows users to display curated artwork, personal photos, and ambient visuals. Not only does art look great, but displaying artwork on the W6 takes full advantage of the TV’s flush-wall design and OLED picture quality.
The Bottom Line
We spent time with the LG OLED evo W6 at CES 2026 and it made a clear case for itself. This is not just another premium OLED. The near flush 9 mm class panel and the Zero Connect Box change how a large screen TV lives in a room. It is one of the few designs that actually reduces visual clutter instead of adding to it, and that matters if the TV shares space with everything else in your home.
It is not perfect. You are paying a premium for the form factor and installation approach. The Zero Connect Box solves cable management but adds another component that has to be placed somewhere. And while the wireless link is a real advantage for clean installs, some buyers will still prefer a traditional wired connection for peace of mind.
Who is this for? Not the budget crowd and not the spec chasers looking for the absolute brightest panel at any cost. This is for buyers who care as much about how a TV fits into a space as how it performs. Interior designers, custom installers, and anyone trying to avoid turning their living room into a black rectangle showroom will get it immediately. Everyone else will look at the price first and then decide how much that disappearing act is worth.
Price & Availability
The LG OLED evo W6 Wallpaper TVs are available for pre-order on LG’s website at the following prices:
Related Reading:
For more insight into LG’s OLED evo W6 series Wallpaper TVs, check out previous reports and hands-on video from CES 2026:
Tech
Let John Ternus be John Ternus, and not Cook or Jobs
Pundits are saying John Ternus will be a Steve Jobs clone when he takes over Apple, while others are adamant that he’ll really be another Tim Cook. The truth is that of course he will be neither, and both, while being John Ternus.

John Ternus became a regular presenter of Apple’s keynote videos – image credit: Apple
Even John Ternus will have to wait to see what happens when he’s Apple CEO, but it might be years before that becomes clear and clickbait deadlines won’t wait that long. That’s not only on technology sites, as even The Hollywood Reporter has spun 900 words out of having no idea what Ternus will do with Apple TV.
At least they say nobody knows. Others with unnamed sources and unjustified speculation have instead already revealed with total certainty exactly what the man is going to be like.
Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
Tech
AI Tools Are Helping Mediocre North Korean Hackers Steal Millions
The advent of AI hacking tools has raised fears of a near future in which anyone can use automated tools to dig up exploitable vulnerabilities in any piece of software, like a kind of digital intrusion superpower. Here in the present, however, AI seems to be playing a more mundane, if still concerning, role in hackers’ toolkit: It’s helping mediocre hackers level up and carry out broad, effective malware campaigns. That includes one group of relatively unskilled North Korean cybercriminals who’ve been discovered using AI to carry out virtually every part of an operation that hacked thousands of victims to steal their cryptocurrency.
On Wednesday, cybersecurity firm Expel revealed what it describes as a North Korean state-sponsored cybercrime operation that installed credential-stealing malware on more than 2,000 computers, specifically targeting the machines of developers working on small cryptocurrency launches, NFT creation, and Web3 projects. By using the AI tools of US-based companies, including those of OpenAI, Cursor, and Anima, the hacker group—which Expel calls HexagonalRodent—“vibe coded” almost every part of its intrusion campaign, from writing their malware to building the fake websites of companies used in its phishing schemes. That AI-enabled hacking allowed the group to steal as much as $12 million in cryptocurrency from victims in three months.
What’s most striking about the HexagonalRodent hacking campaign isn’t its sophistication, says Marcus Hutchins, the security researcher who discovered the group, but rather how AI tools allowed an apparently unsophisticated group to carry out a profitable theft spree in the service of the North Korean state.
“These operators don’t have the skills to write code. They don’t have the skills to set up infrastructure. AI is actually enabling them to do things that they otherwise just would not be able to do,” says Hutchins, who became well-known in the cybersecurity community after disabling the WannaCry ransomware worm created by North Korean hackers.
Emoji-Littered, AI-Written Code
HexagonalRodent’s hacking operation focused on tricking crypto developers with fraudulent job offers at tech firms, going so far as to create full websites for the fake companies recruiting the victims, often created with AI web design tools. Eventually, the victim was told they’d have to download and complete a coding assignment as a test—which the hackers had infected with malware that infiltrated their machine and stole credentials, including those that in some cases could grant access to the keys that controlled their crypto wallets.
Those parts of the hacking operation appear to have been well-honed and effective, but the hackers were also clumsy enough to leave parts of their own infrastructure unsecured, leaking the prompts they used to write their malware with tools that included OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Cursor. They also exposed a database where they tracked victim wallets, which allowed Expel to estimate the total amount of cryptocurrency the hackers may have stolen. (While those wallets added up to $12 million in total contents, Hutchins says the company couldn’t confirm for each target whether the entire sum had already been drained from the wallets or if the hackers still needed to obtain keys to the victim wallets in some cases, given some may have been protected with hardware security tokens.)
Hutchins also analyzed samples of the hackers’ malware and found other clues that it was largely—perhaps entirely—created with AI. It was thoroughly annotated with comments throughout—in English—hardly the typical coding habits of North Koreans, despite the fact that some command-and-control servers for the malware tied them to known North Korean hacking operations. The malware’s code was also littered with emojis, which Hutchins points out can, in some cases, serve as a clue that software was written by a large language model, given that programmers writing on a PC keyboard rather than a phone rarely take the time to insert emojis. “It’s a pretty well-documented sign of AI-written code,” Hutchins says.
Tech
iPhone 18 Pro to lead Apple's four-phase camera upgrade strategy
![]()
Digital Chat Station, a popular account on the Chinese social media app Weibo, claims the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max will ship with the new feature on the main rear camera. Since the iPhone 14 Pro, the primary cameras on the rear of the top-tier iPhones have used a…
Read Entire Article
Source link
Tech
Kash Patel’s Defamation Suit Against The Atlantic Is Designed To Generate Headlines, Not Win In Court
There are defamation lawsuits designed to win, and then there are defamation lawsuits designed to generate headlines for your fans on social media, punish journalists, and maybe — if you’re lucky — force a settlement or intimidate future reporting. FBI Director Kash Patel’s brand new defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic is very obviously the second kind.
On Friday, The Atlantic published a truly devastating profile of Patel, reporting that “more than two dozen” current and former officials described a director who shows up to Ned’s in DC and the Poodle Room in Las Vegas to drink until he is visibly drunk, and who has been difficult to wake on occasions when his security detail needed him. There’s also this fun anecdote in the opening, talking about a time, earlier this month, when Patel had trouble logging into his computer:
He quickly became convinced that he had been locked out, and he panicked, frantically calling aides and allies to announce that he had been fired by the White House, according to nine people familiar with his outreach. Two of these people described his behavior as a “freak-out.”
That’s just kinda amusing, but there are a lot more serious concerns, such as the fact that the nation’s top cop is (according to the article): “often away or unreachable, delaying time-sensitive decisions needed to advance investigations.”
The article included a response from Patel, attributed to him by the FBI: “Print it, all false, I’ll see you in court — bring your checkbook.”
On Monday, represented by MAGA-world’s go-to lawyer Jesse Binnall, Patel did exactly that, filing a 19-page complaint in federal court in DC seeking $250 million in damages.
The complaint is, to put it charitably, not great. To put it less charitably, it reads like a press release with a case caption stapled to the top.
Let’s start with the central legal problem, because it’s kinda fatal. Patel is indisputably a public official — he runs the FBI — which means under New York Times v. Sullivan, he has to plead and eventually prove that The Atlantic published with “actual malice,” meaning with knowledge that the statements were false, or with reckless disregard for their truth or falsity — a legal term of art that requires showing the publisher actually suspected the statements were false and deliberately avoided finding out, not merely that they moved quickly or relied on anonymous sources. This is a very high bar. It’s been a high bar since 1964. Every lawyer who files a defamation case for a public figure is supposed to know that this is the hill they have to climb.
Here is how the complaint attempts to plead actual malice:
Defendants’ conscious decision to ignore the detailed, specific, and substantive refutations in the Pre-Publication Letter, and their refusal to give a reasonable amount of time for the FBI and Director Patel to respond, is among the strongest possible evidence of actual malice.
In other words: Patel denied it, The Atlantic published anyway, therefore actual malice. There is no real attempt to plead actual malice beyond that.
That’s not actual malice. That’s just how journalism works. Every news story that anyone has ever complained about in history has been published after the subject denied it. If “the subject denied it and you published anyway” were sufficient to establish actual malice, the First Amendment would be a dead letter and every investigative story ever written would generate a winning lawsuit.
Yes, those filing SLAPP lawsuits often claim that their subjects’ denials constitute actual malice — but that’s not how it works in court, and it never has been.
And we know this argument doesn’t work because we just watched a judge throw out Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation suit against the Wall Street Journal for making essentially this exact argument. That was all of a week ago. A public figure’s denial, followed by publication, is not actual malice. A court said that a week ago. This is well-known, settled law. Binnall surely knows this. Patel’s filing this suit anyway.
The complaint does gesture weakly at some other theories — that the anonymous sources were “partisans with axes to grind,” that The Atlantic imposed a two-hour comment deadline, that there was “editorial animus” evidenced by prior Atlantic coverage. But even stacked together, these don’t get you to actual malice. Relying on anonymous sources isn’t reckless disregard—it’s how journalism works. Short deadlines for comment aren’t evidence of malice either; they’re standard operating procedure for breaking news. Prior negative coverage doesn’t even come close to the legal standard, since public figures doing controversial things tend to get criticized.
There’s also the fact that the complaint tries to twist statements by anonymous sources which the Atlantic reported on as The Atlantic’s own speech. Almost every one of the 19 allegedly defamatory statements enumerated in paragraph 18 is, on the face of the article, attributed to anonymous sources. For example, count 18(e) claims that a request for ‘breaching equipment’ — “normally used by SWAT and hostage-rescue teams to quickly gain entry into buildings” — was made because Patel was unreachable. The complaint states:
Fitzpatrick knows that her anonymous sources, unwilling to go on the record, are partisans with axes to grind and are not in a position to know the facts.
“Partisans with axes to grind” is not relevant to the actual malice standard. And, come on. Anonymous sources not willing to go on the record accusing a man who runs the FBI and is famously vindictive toward his perceived enemies… is not exactly a shocking revelation.
Almost all of the claims are like this. “According to multiple people familiar with the request.” “According to information supplied to Justice Department and White House officials.” “According to the more than two dozen people I interviewed.”
The Atlantic’s defense (if it even gets that far) is therefore not going to need to be “we can prove Kash Patel was drunk at Ned’s.” It’s going to be “multiple credible sources told us this, we reported what they said along with corroborating evidence, and we have our notes, emails, and recordings to prove that’s what they told us.” That’s a fundamentally different — and far easier — thing to defend. Publishers aren’t required to prove the absolute truth of everything their sources say. They’re required to not publish with reckless disregard for the truth, which requires evidence about what the publisher knew or suspected, not what turned out to be the ultimate truth of the matter.
The Atlantic had multiple sources for each of its claims. It has corroborating evidence to support the claims. That is not a situation that says actual malice. It’s a situation that says “we did careful reporting.”
The complaint doesn’t grapple with this distinction at all. It just keeps repeating that the FBI told The Atlantic the claims were false before publication, as if that’s the end of the story. It isn’t. Subjects of investigative reporting deny things all the time. Publishers weigh denials against their sources and decide whether to publish based on all of the evidence they’ve collected. The First Amendment protects that decision-making process precisely so that powerful officials can’t just deny critical stories into non-existence.
In theory, there’s also the issue of discovery. Whenever cases like this get filed, people on social media say things like “can’t wait for discovery.” But cases like this rarely even get to the discovery stage. The Atlantic will almost certainly file for a motion to dismiss, which almost always happens pre-discovery, and a failure to competently plead actual malice is a good reason for the case to be tossed at that stage, without any discovery.
But also, given that Patel was famously seen on video chugging a beer at the Olympics in the Men’s Hockey locker room, it seems like Patel himself might not be all that interested in discovery either.

Of course, the goal was never to win. The goal was to file. And, sure some people will point to Trump’s settlements with news orgs, but those were to the president himself, and quite clearly designed to curry favor. As powerful as the FBI director is, it’s doubtful that the Atlantic is looking to curry favor with the FBI director via a settlement.
And that brings us to the other tell: the Streisand Effect. The complaint itself complains how much attention the article — again talking about how various officials in the FBI were concerned about situations where the FBI director appeared to be blackout drunk — got some attention on the internet.
The Article was widely disseminated on the internet, through AMG’s magazine and associated platforms, and was foreseeably republished, summarized, and discussed throughout national and international media.
Ya think?
Patel’s response to this alleged injury was to file a $250 million lawsuit — an action guaranteed to drive far more traffic to the very article he says is destroying his reputation. Every news outlet that covers the lawsuit links to or summarizes the original piece. Every social media post about the suit reintroduces the allegations to people who had never seen them. If your complaint is that too many people read the story, filing a splashy nine-figure lawsuit is a strange way to handle it.
None of this is an accident or a rookie mistake. This is how Binnall — and his predecessor in this particular niche, Steven Biss — have always done it.
Long-time Techdirt readers may recall that we first covered Kash Patel filing a SLAPP suit all the way back in 2019, when he was a White House staffer and former Devin Nunes aide. He used Steven Biss — Nunes’s own go-to lawyer for suing critics, satirical Twitter cows, and journalists — to sue Politico over accurate reporting about Fiona Hill’s congressional testimony. That complaint, like this one, read more like a press release than a pleading, opening with a tirade about “weaponized media” and “partisan hacks and character assassins who work to advance the interests and agendas of dark money.”
Biss specialized in filing SLAPP suits for MAGA figures. Most of them lost. He filed so many of them that when he had a stroke in 2023, his law license was eventually suspended on impairment grounds, and a bunch of his cases had to be handed off to someone else. That someone else was mostly Jesse Binnall, who promptly continued the losing streak. The Flynn family’s SLAPP suit against CNN? Tossed. Patel’s own 2024 threat letter to MSNBC commentator Olivia Troye? Answered with a Monty Python reference.
Filing is the point. Winning is beside it. These suits generate favorable headlines in friendly media, signal aggression to critics, raise the cost of covering the subject, and — if everything goes perfectly — get a defendant to settle just to make the expense go away. Whether they actually prevail on the merits is beside the point for the filer. Binnall has built a practice around this model. Patel has used that practice repeatedly across multiple roles over the last few years.
This is a textbook SLAPP, and it’s a good reminder of why we need anti-SLAPP laws to begin with.
Which brings us to a frustrating final wrinkle: the case was filed in federal court in DC, and while DC has an anti-SLAPP statute, the DC Circuit ruled a decade ago that it doesn’t apply in federal court. On top of that, the DC Court of Appeals more recently invalidated part of the law’s fee-shifting provisions. So even though DC ostensibly has protections against exactly this kind of lawsuit, The Atlantic basically can’t use them here. This is a pattern repeated across the country — patchwork state laws, some strong, some weak, many with large loopholes, and many federal circuits have barred their use in federal courts.
This is why we need a federal anti-SLAPP law, and why we need strong anti-SLAPP laws in every state and territory. The people who file these lawsuits know exactly which jurisdictions lack them, and they file accordingly. The asymmetry — where the cost of filing a meritless suit is minimal for the plaintiff, while the cost of defending it is substantial for the defendant — is exactly what makes the SLAPP tactic work. Anti-SLAPP laws with robust fee-shifting flip that equation, making bad-faith plaintiffs think twice.
Absent that, we’re left with the situation we have now: the head of the nation’s federal law enforcement agency uses a $250 million defamation suit as a political messaging tool, filed by a lawyer whose track record of losing these cases is long and detailed. The Atlantic will likely win on a motion to dismiss. Patel will get his headlines. And a lot more people will have read about Kash Patel’s alleged drinking habits than ever would have otherwise.
For the supposed “free speech party,” filing vexatious SLAPP suits against investigative reporters has become a rite of passage — a way of making clear there’s a price for making the people in power look bad.
Tech
Ultimate Edition is out for the iPhone and iPad
Control is one of my favorite adventure games of the last decade or so, a mind-bending trip through an ever-changing building where you get to use telekinesis to battle some pretty freaky enemies. It was a graphically-demanding game when it was released in 2019, but a lot can change in less than six years: Control: Ultimate Edition is now available on the iPhone and iPad for a mere $5, following its announcement last October. It’s a universal purchase, which means if you buy it it’ll work on the iPad, iPhone and Mac as well.
Developer Remedy promises that it’s the full Control experience, with the DLC episodes included. Remedy rebuilt the UI and controls to make it work on touchscreen devices; the company says that it has tweaked aiming and the various puzzles to make them work better for the iPad and iPhone. But naturally, the game also works with controllers. If you’re serious about having the best experience with the game, finding a way to play with physical controls is probably a good idea.
The game will run on iPhones with at least an A17 Pro chip. That includes the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max, as well all of the iPhone 16 and iPhone 17 series. Plenty of iPad models can run the game, as well — any iPad with an M-series chip or the A17 Pro will work. That means the current basic iPad, with its A16 processor, is left out of the fun. But any iPad Air or Pro from the last four years or so should be good to go.
I tried a test version of Control when I reviewed the new iPad Air recently and, unsurprisingly, the tablet’s M4 chip was more than powerful enough to make for a smooth experience. My main gripe is that when sprinting, you have to hold down the L3 button the entire time you’re running rather than just click it once, which is how it works on other platforms. Otherwise it looks and plays smoothly, though I can’t vouch for how it’ll perform on hardware older than the M4 from 2024.
Control marks the latest “AAA” title to hit the iPad and iPhone. Apple has aggressively courted developers for its platforms in recent years, and while most games don’t hit the Mac or iOS when they launch, more and more are showing up eventually. There are multiple recent Resident Evil titles for the iPad, and other games like Death Stranding and Assassin’s Creed Mirage have been ported recently as well. There are others on the Mac as well, including demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Lies of P. Apple’s platforms aren’t going to be an avid gamer’s first stop still, but having high-profile games to supplement the many indie titles available helps round out the options for Apple users.
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Theodora Dress
-
Sports5 days agoNWFL Suspends Two Players Over Post-Match Clash in Ado-Ekiti
-
Politics5 days agoPalestine barred from entering Canada for FIFA Congress
-
Entertainment3 days ago
NBA Analyst Charles Barkley Chimes in on Ice Spice McDonald’s Fiasco
-
Business3 days agoPowerball Result April 18, 2026: No Jackpot Winner in Powerball Draw: $75 Million Rolls Over
-
Politics3 days agoZack Polanski demands ‘council homes not luxury flats for foreign investors’
-
Crypto World5 days agoRussia Pushes Bill to Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Tech4 days agoAuto Enthusiast Scores Running Tesla Model 3 for Two Grand and Turns It Into Bare-Bones Go-Kart
-
Politics2 days agoGary Stevenson delivers timely reminder to register to vote as deadline TODAY
-
Tech7 days ago‘Avatar: Aang, The Last Airbender’ Leaked Online. Some Fans Say Paramount Deserves the Fallout
-
Business6 days agoCreo Medical agree sale of its manufacturing operation
-
Business7 hours agoRolls-Royce Voted UK’s Most Iconic Trade Mark as IPO Register Hits 150
-
Crypto World5 days agoRussia Introduces Bill To Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Crypto World4 days agoKelp DAO rsETH Bridge Hack Drains $292M as DeFi Losses Top $600M in Two Weeks
-
Sports7 days agoBritish climbers complete new route in Swiss Alps
-
Tech7 days agoFord EV and tech chief leaving automaker
-
Sports6 days ago“Felt Much Better Today”: Josh Hazlewood Opens Up On His Recovery Win Over LSG
-
Entertainment7 days agoRuby Rose Accuses Katy Perry Of Sexual Assault, Police React
-
Business6 days agoCheaper Doritos and Lays helps PepsiCo win back struggling snackers
-
Entertainment6 days agoClavicular Says Streaming May Not Work Without Substances

You must be logged in to post a comment Login