Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

Java was a three-day hotfix away from dying horribly on stage

Published

on

If there is a driving theme to The Java Story documentary, which debuted Friday on YouTube, it would be that even some of the most important and popular technologies come from humble beginnings. In this case, we’re talking about a language that started life as a failed attempt at set-top box dominance and required a massive rewrite just days before its big conference debut.

Today, Java consistently hovers near the top of the TIOBE programming language popularity index and remains widely used for large enterprise applications.

But at one point in 1994, Sun Microsystems was just about to abandon the effort. Tim Lindholm, who was hired to polish up a virtual machine runtime for what would become Java, told The Register, “I was one of the last people hired before the whole thing fell apart.”

Advertisement

It wouldn’t be the last time Java outlived its detractors. 

Java chronicled

If the idea of a professionally produced documentary about a programming language sounds familiar, then you’ve probably seen the ones on C++, Python or React. These were the work of tech job site Honeypot.io, which funded the documentaries to build a user base. 

In 2019, Honeypot was acquired by XING (which rebranded as New Work SE). However, founder Emma Tracey was more interested in the documentary side of things and bought the production shop back from New Work, reuniting the original gang and rebranding their efforts as Cult.Repo (short for Culture Repository). The Java Story is the first product of the newly liberated media company. 

The documentary features many of Java’s prime movers, including creator James Gosling and senior Oracle Java architects Mark Reinhold and Brian Goetz.

Advertisement

While it may have taken a Hollywood-style effort to construct a Hero’s Journey around the plodding progress of Python, Java is a veritable Love Island of dramas, some of which were this documentary captured. 

The project that almost wasn’t

Lindholm strayed into the computing field only as a result of the brutally cold winter of Minnesota, where he was living in a tent. He realized he would need someplace warmer and so scored an internship at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois. There, he gained early experience with virtual machines thanks to the lab’s use of Prolog. 

His goal was not to be a programmer, but a mathematician. “Computer science was for people who couldn’t be real mathematicians,” he said.

But he learned the craft of implementing Prolog.

Advertisement

“I learned to write to very high-quality virtual machines with things like garbage collection and embeddability,” he said. The VM experience led him to subsequent jobs at Xerox PARC and eventually Sun.

When Lindholm arrived 1994, it was to work for an experimental “spin-in” subsidiary called FirstPerson. At the time, Sun made bank selling high-end workstations to engineers, but it wanted to build software for devices outside the typical workstation and PC market.

FirstPerson’s chief concern was a bid from Time Warner to provide the interactive video-on-demand software for television set top boxes. Gosling wrote a language and runtime for the project, called Oak.

The contract ultimately went to late bidder Silicon Graphics – a Sun rival commonly known as SGI. In a lesson of not always getting what you want, the Time Warner project struggled for a few years before the plug was pulled in 1997, which didn’t do the already-struggling SGI any financial favors.   

Advertisement

But at the time, Sun took the defeat hard, laying off most of the FirstPerson staff.  Lindholm had been there for only a month and wasn’t overly invested in the set top box. “I’ll do whatever comes next,” he recalled.

Sun kept only 12 engineers to work on Oak, including Gosling and project manager Kim Polese. But for Lindholm, the future didn’t look promising.

“We were like refugees in a bombed-out bunker,” he said. Those who were laid off tossed their office gear out into the hallways. Lindholm felt like “dead meat” at the Sun office, just waiting to get laid off himself. 

Pivot to the Web

It was purely serendipitous that the project moved to the then-nascent web. One of the surviving engineers had been playing with the recently released Mosaic browser and suggested the World Wide Web should be Oak’s next target. This was a year before Windows 95 brought the internet and web browsing to the masses.

Advertisement

The team built a Mosaic clone called WebRunner on Oak that would run animations. It would be the precursor to what would become Java applets. 

After that, events moved quickly, Lindholm recalled. Oak was renamed Java in early 1995, supposedly as a nod to the engineering team’s coffee consumption. “It took off like a friggin’ rocket. It was just crazy. We were all stressed,” he said. 

An early wave of web developers was rapidly discovering the limits of creating web pages using HTML, which, after all, is a markup language.

Lindholm said that his job, alongside , was

Advertisement

Gosling and the crew had assembled a rough prototype, but it fell to Lindholm, alongside fellow new hire and Lisp expert Frank Yellin “to make this thing actually work.”  The pair were in charge of the commercial grade implementation, ensuring that the advanced concepts Gosling had outlined, such as threading and garbage collection, functioned in the real world.  Lindholm and Yellin later co-authored the original JVM specification

Threading at the time was particularly new. There were no libraries they could use to implement the idea, and Lindholm knew relatively little about the concept.

The company planned to introduce Java at the 1995 SunWorld convention, the precursor to JavaOne. But the runtime was crashing badly. After much sleuthing, Lindholm figured out Java’s threading model was “fundamentally broken. It was totally screwed up,” he said. 

The problem was that system interrupts were being issued while the SPARC processor was executing an instruction. This proved disastrous because the system could not recover the state that had been flushed from memory and would therefore “die horribly.”

Advertisement

Lindholm realized you could only have the interrupts happen at certain points. So, three days before the conference, he rewrote the entire threads package. At the conference, when then Sun CEO Scott McNealy showed off Java, Lindholm sat in the audience dreading the worst. Thankfully, the rewrite worked.   

Before open source

Lindholm was also in charge of the language’s first attempt at open source, years before Eric Raymond made the term common. The company offered the binary Java runtime as a free download, but the company gave away “the sources,” as Lindholm put it, to anyone who requested it. Thousands did. 

The documentary retells a story that the Java Internet domain was getting so much traffic – more than Sun.com itself – that the Java team ran a pirate T3 line into the office. Such were the days before the cloud. 

At the time, Lindholm viewed giving away the source as a good career move. Should he ever get the ax, perhaps some other company would pick up the code and run with it. They also found outsiders could fix bugs and even extend the software to other platforms. 

Advertisement

The “source” program wasn’t formalized, however. Sun did have Richard Stallman come to talk, but he seemed “too radical” for the Sun execs, Lindholm recalled. Sun would not actually decide to officially release Java as open source for another decade. 

Ironically enough, Java applets were only modestly adopted for the web, as other technologies such as ColdFusion and Netscape’s JavaScript project ended up doing the heavy lifting for Web programmers. But applets were a gateway to the real action, namely powering the back-end servers. 

The evil empire

Then, Microsoft started paying attention. It saw the runtime as a potential threat to Windows itself, particularly for the fledgling Windows NT, which was starting to make headway into the enterprise. 

For today’s younger generation of IT pros, it is hard to overstate how aggressive and hyper-competent Microsoft could be at that time. In 1996, the company licensed Java for Windows, but then added some additional APIs and declined to support a few others (Anyone remember Microsoft’s J++?). Sun alleged that Microsoft’s changes were intended to undermine Java’s cross-platform compatibility and steer developers toward Microsoft’s Windows-specific implementation.

Advertisement

The years-long court case zapped the development team’s energy, diverting resources away from Java.

“I spent days in deposition talking about this under oath,” Lindholm recalled. The disputes ended with Microsoft paying Sun nearly $2 billion through a series of settlements. “It was personal for us,” he said. 

A wild ride

The documentary goes on to cover the following decades of the language’s growth through to the present day, including the over-engineered era of J2EE and Java EE 5, the glimmer of hope provided by the Spring framework, Sun’s implosion and subsequent acquisition by Oracle, and the flourishing of JVM languages following the release of OpenJDK.

Java continued to be a success for Sun, even as its chief business of selling SPARC-based Internet servers fizzled thanks to the influx of low-cost Linux x86 boxes. Lindholm noted that the Java team grew so large that it took over Sun’s headquarters and eventually had to move into the old Apple headquarters.

Advertisement

But Lindholm’s passion for Java evaporated by the early 2000s, swamped by the increasingly corporate environment, and so he left for Google, where he would spend the next 20 years until his retirement earlier this year. 

Looking back to his early involvement, Lindholm admitted “it was kind of a random thing. You can never tell what parts of your life will end up being really significant for whatever reason.”

Others agreed that Java has been a wild ride.

As Java creator James Gosling said in the doc, “What excites me most about the future is the unknown. Lots of things happen, and mostly the interesting ones are the ones you could never predict.” ®

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Obsession 4K UHD Review: Hollywood’s $400 Million Lesson It Won’t Learn

Published

on

In Obsession, an awkward young man gets more than he bargained for when he wishes for his crush to love him back with the help of a gag gift from a novelty store. After a rocky start, Bear gets what he wanted… sort of… before his relationship with Nikki takes a series of increasingly bizarre turns and goes completely off the rails.

In his feature film debut, writer, director, and editor Curry Barker demonstrates one of those uniquely original voices that makes us rethink what a horror movie can be, shocking even genre buffs and video reviewers who think they have seen it all. With tips of the cap to The Twilight Zone and Get Out, the script takes us places we have never been, growing deeper and darker while maintaining a surprising amount of humor in perfect balance.

The performances help tremendously, with the lead actors bringing a naturalistic edginess that ensures we never quite know what to expect next. Props to newcomer Inde Navarrette as Nikki, who is so terrifying that she reportedly made her costars, and herself, quite uncomfortable.

obsession-4k-uhd-blu-ray-cover

The movie is presented in the unusual 1.5:1 aspect ratio, with vertical black bars on the left and right and occasional elements within the frame that add to the sense of claustrophobia, as though the characters are trapped in their predicament. Director of photography Taylor Clemons often backlights the actors to creepy effect, but the high dynamic range preserves ample facial detail, while the precise image reveals haphazard shaving stubble, the fine fibers of a sweater, and the uneven degrees of focus within the frame.

You could call the sonic jolts in Obsession’s Dolby Atmos mix “jump scares,” but not in the same way as in, say, a Freddy or Jason style slasher. Instead, an abrupt beat might trigger the question, “What the hell is she going to do next?” The answer: Nothing good. Hard offscreen cues do a good job of establishing three-dimensional space, while Rock Burwell’s musical score envelops us but also bludgeons us from time to time, leaving us exhausted by the end credits.

Advertisement

Barker’s audio commentary track is definitely worth a listen for the infectious energy of a filmmaker at the top of his game. In a hurry? Check out the 19-minute “Obsession Unleashed” featurette, which also brings in the principal actors to share their own behind-the-scenes tidbits. The two-disc set includes an HD Blu-ray of the movie with the same extras, plus a 4K Movies Anywhere digital copy code.

This is definitely one I’ll be watching again, which is another reason physical media rocks. There are plenty of clues and little Easter eggs waiting to be discovered and dissected, a testament to the thoroughly smart script and the clever way Barker executes his twisty vision.

Obsession 4K Ultra HD Collector's Edition Back Cover 2026 Movie

Movie Details

  • STUDIO: Universal Pictures Home Entertainment
  • FORMAT: Ultra HD 4K Blu-ray (July 14, 2026)
  • THEATRICAL RELEASE YEAR: 2026
  • ASPECT RATIO: 1.50:1
  • HDR FORMATS: Dolby Vision, HDR10
  • AUDIO FORMAT: Dolby Atmos with TrueHD 7.1 core
  • LENGTH: 109 mins.
  • MPAA RATING: R
  • DIRECTOR: Curry Barker
  • STARRING: Inde Navarrette, Michael Johnston, Cooper Tomlinson, Megan Lawless, Andy Richter, Darin Toonder

Our Ratings

★★★★★★★★★★ Movie

★★★★★★★★★★ Picture

★★★★★★★★★★ Sound

Advertisement

★★★★★★★★★★ Extras

Where to buy:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

The 35 Best Board Games for Family Game Night

Published

on

More Family Board Games

Stack of board game boxes on large wooden table

Photograph: Simon Hill

There are so many family board games. Here are a few more we liked.

In a World for $28: Someone reads out an “In a World,” card which might say “where we are setting up a colony on a distant planet,” and then the players read out “We want” cards like “a lifetime supply of bananas” or “a thriving coffee shop.” It’s a family-friendly twist on Cards Against Humanity (with similar weaknesses), but players also try to sell their card as the best pick which adds a nice twist.

Cat in the Box Deluxe Edition for $31: There are a few mechanics at play here, including bidding on how many tricks you think you’ll win before play begins, but what makes this game different is that you must also decide on your card’s color. It seems complex at first, but younger kids used to card games will be able to grasp this.

Advertisement

Wingspan for $55: This might be the pinnacle of nature-themed board games and will appeal to anyone who loves our feathered friends. It blends authentic knowledge about different bird species and their needs, habitats, and abilities, with a healthy dose of strategic depth.

Dorfromantik: The Duel for $41: Based on the video game Dorfromantik, which spawned a cooperative board game, this spin-off pits you against another player as you draw tiles to build a landscape and try to complete tasks along the way. With identical sets in red and blue, it’s all about who builds a better environment to satisfy their villagers and score the most points. Play time is under an hour. You could play with two teams, but it works best as a two-player game.

Advertisement

Hey Hey Relay for $15: This super silly dice game is a race between two teams with challenge cards prompting silly voices and physical actions before you can proceed. It’s fast and chaotic to play, but probably best for younger kids (the makers suggest 6 years and up). My kids didn’t like it much, but this could be a fun party game.

Ship Show for $30: This cooperative game casts players as stockers and shippers and challenges them to correctly ship orders by guessing the correct tiles based on clues provided by the way they have been grouped. The time limit adds pressure, and this can be fun for the right group (you need to be on the same wavelength), but we found the wait for the stockers to set up was dull for shippers, and the scoring was laborious.

Flip 7 for $8: The thrill of pushing your luck is the draw for this hybrid card game, as you hit or stick Blackjack-style, trying to get seven different face-up cards. Special action cards and modifiers mix things up, allowing for some tactical play. Suitable for three or more players aged 8 and up, it only takes 20 minutes to play.

Advertisement

Tension: The Top 10 Naming Game for $30: Topic cards have 10 items within a category, and the opposing team has 60 seconds to guess as many as they can. Cards are divided into two colors (easy and harder), making it easy to play with kids or adjust the difficulty on the fly. This works well with any age or team size, but be prepared for lots of shouting and laughing.

You Gotta Be Kitten Me! for $26: A simple twist on liar’s dice that focuses on bluffing and calling bluffs; I am of two minds about this game. On the one hand, the game is nothing special, but on the other, cute cats! My moggy-obsessed daughter immediately wanted to play, and we had a few laughs with outrageous bluffs on the number of glasses, hats, and bow ties on these felines.

Poetry for Neanderthals for $20: Every card has a word, and your seemingly simple task is to get your team to correctly guess it within the time limit by speaking in single syllables only. If you break the rules, the opposition can hit you with the inflatable “No” stick. Suitable for two to eight players aged 7 and up, it’s loud, silly, and usually makes everyone laugh.

Danger Danger for $9: Fast and frenetic, this simple card game for two teams is about trying to have high-scoring cards showing at the end of each round. There are no turns, you can cover the other team’s cards, and rounds are timed, but you must guess when the round will end. Super simple and very quick to play, this game can get chaotic.

Advertisement

That Escalated Quickly for $20: This game is quick, easy, and fun for up to eight players. Featuring scenarios such as “I have invented a new sport, what is it?” players must provide suggestions from least dangerous (1) to most dangerous (10) based on their assigned number for each round. The leader of the round has to try to get them in the correct order. It works best with witty players who know each other well.

Sounds Fishy for $23: Another fun group game from Big Potato, the challenge in Sounds Fishy is to spot fake answers. Each card poses a question, but only one of the answers you get is correct. It’s for four to 10 players, and we found it more fun but tougher with more people.

Cards Against Humanity: Family Edition for $29: You can play this party game with up to 30 players, and it will produce a fair bit of juvenile giggling and chortling. Like the adult version, there isn’t much strategy here, but finding the perfect combination to crack everyone up is satisfying.

Advertisement

Don’t Bother

We were not so keen on these games.

Best Family Board Games you shouldn't bother getting on wood table

Photograph: Simon Hill

Zilence: As a group of zombie apocalypse survivors atop a skyscraper, you must choose the correct flight path to snag the resources you need, determined by cards. A tight time limit makes it tricky to pick the right routes from the tangled mess on the game board, and it can be assembled differently for replay value. But the backdrop feels incongruous, and we all agreed it wasn’t much fun to play.

Connecto: Connect different symbols on your board with a dry-erase marker based on a randomly drawn challenge card to make a picture of something (like connect the dots). The first one to guess what it’s supposed to be wins the round (some are only vaguely like what they’re meant to be). Longevity takes a hit, as there’s no fun in replaying solved puzzles.

A Game of Cat & Mouth: Incredibly simple, this dexterity game challenges you to fire rubber balls through a cat’s mouth with magnetic paws, but they end up everywhere. Games tend to be very one-sided, and my kids got bored almost immediately. It is also impossible to play with actual cats in the vicinity.

Advertisement

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft wants to stop screenshot leaks, one Edge tab at a time

Published

on

Microsoft is looking to improve the privacy protection of your sensitive PDFs by closing one of the more obvious loopholes in its document protection system. It is also giving businesses another reason to keep Microsoft Edge firmly installed.

Starting next month, OneDrive and SharePoint will block screen captures when users open certain sensitivity-labeled PDFs through their web viewers in Microsoft Edge. The restriction applies to enterprise organizations using Microsoft Purview Information Protection rather than ordinary personal OneDrive accounts.

Your ordinary PDFs will continue as usual

The protection applies specifically to PDFs carrying a sensitivity label without the Copy, also described as EXTRACT, permission. If these conditions are met, screen capture enforcement will activate by default when the document is viewed in Edge. Existing labels and organization policies remain in place.

Unlabeled files and labels without these restrictions continue behaving normally. The feature affects OneDrive for Business and SharePoint Online, so you will not suddenly lose the ability to screenshot a restaurant menu or instruction manual. The company added that the change aims to close a gap between its desktop applications and browser experience.

Purview labels could already prevent actions such as editing, printing, copying, and taking screenshots in supported desktop apps. However, PDFs opened in the browser did not consistently respect the same screen-capture control. Admins can also disable local downloads, preventing users from simply saving a protected document and reopening it elsewhere.

Advertisement

The protection currently ends at Edge

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and other mobile web browsers will not support the restriction when it reaches general availability. Microsoft warns that users opening protected documents outside Edge may receive inconsistent enforcement, and it recommends that businesses use Conditional Access or browser-management policies to direct employees toward Edge.

Unfortunately, this is exclusive to Microsoft Edge at the moment. The security benefit is easy to understand, especially for companies sharing sensitive documents like financial records, legal material, or unreleased products. Its effectiveness depends heavily on convincing, or requiring, everyone involved to use Microsoft’s browser.

Windows Latest reports that support for additional browsers and mobile apps could arrive later. Microsoft’s current notice does not provide a broader rollout date. Targeted organizations should begin receiving the feature in early August, followed by a worldwide general rollout between the middle and end of the month.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Kapwing AI video editor review

Published

on

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Kapwing is among the best AI video editors today. It allows you to create videos with simple text prompts and generate lively AI characters to build detailed storylines.

Trusted by brands like Google, Dyson, and Spotify and used by thousands of content creators across YouTube, TikTok, and digital marketing platforms, Kapwing has quickly grown to become one of the industry’s favorite video generation and editing software.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

“Brain fry” and broken promises: The hidden cost of AI without architecture

Published

on

If your AI rollout is making people more exhausted, the architecture is wrong. That’s not a provocative claim; it’s the logical conclusion of what the data shows. With 69% of UK businesses implementing AI assistants, these tools have become part of everyday working life.

But deployment without the right operational structure is leaving employees exposed to the harmful effects of ‘AI brain fry’. AI overload is not a failure of the individual, but a failure of system design. And it is the responsibility of technology and business leaders to fix it.

Sonali Fenner

Managing Director at Slalom.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

A new AI model wants self-driving cars to think before they swerve

Published

on

Self-driving cars have gotten pretty good at driving. The harder problem is teaching them to drive safely in situations nobody planned for. We have heard horror stories of self-driving cars, behaving erratically in emergency situations, often times delaying first responders from reaching the scene.

A team at Seoul National University, led by professor Jun Won Choi from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, thinks they have cracked part of that puzzle with a new AI model called SafeDrive. The research was recently selected as a highlight paper at CVPR 2026, a distinction that goes only to roughly 3% of all submissions.

How does SafeDrive make driving decisions safer?

Most end-to-end autonomous driving models work by studying massive amounts of real driving data and trying to mimic how humans react on the road. It works well most of the time, but these systems tend to struggle when it comes to explaining why they chose one path over another, and that becomes a real problem when safety is on the line.

Choi’s team built something called Fine-grained Safety Reasoning to fix this. Instead of picking one driving path and going with it, SafeDrive generates several possible trajectories, combines them with what the car’s sensors are perceiving, and scores each option for safety. The car then picks the path that scores best. It sounds simple, but it directly tackles the two biggest weaknesses of current end-to-end systems, safety and explainability.

Why is this such a big deal for Korea?

As TechXplore reports, this is the first time a Korean-made end-to-end autonomous driving paper has landed a highlight spot at CVPR, one of the biggest AI and computer vision conferences in the world. It is a strong signal that Korea is no longer just watching from the sidelines while the US and China race ahead with their self-driving ambitions.

Advertisement

SafeDrive is not staying stuck in the lab either. It has already been folded into EAD, a reference model backed by Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, and Choi’s team is now working with domestic autonomous driving companies to test it in real vehicles. Choi says the plan is to keep improving the model with bigger datasets and eventually push it toward full commercialization using their own collected data.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Major glitch in Matrix as UK government projects watchdog rates shared services cluster red

Published

on

public sector 

Nine-department ERP overhaul judged unachievable without urgent action

The UK government has admitted that two major planks of its multibillion-pound shared services strategy are in serious trouble.

Matrix, a project that involves moving nine government departments to shared ERP and HR systems, has been rated red by the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (NISTA), which monitors the planning and delivery of major government projects.

Advertisement

This rating means the project has “major issues” with its schedule, budget, quality, or delivery of benefits, and the problems “do not appear to be manageable or resolvable” at this stage.

Matrix is just one of five clusters the government is betting will save £4.3 billion by migrating a total of 17 departments and 300 arms’-length bodies onto shared tech platforms.

The NISTA report for fiscal 2025-26 says the rating reflects “a number of material issues” identified during project planning.

In 2024, Matrix awarded Workday a contract for SaaS finance and HR software and Cognizant a system integration deal with a combined value of £144.3 million.

Advertisement

Matrix was scheduled to begin going live in May 2026, but experienced delays. In March, the Matrix Programme Board met “to consider the case for re-baselining the programme, including the development of a rectification plan and the consideration of several planning scenarios.”

“Replanning is intended to establish a more realistic, credible, and achievable forward plan in response to ongoing delivery challenges. Current emerging analysis indicates a delay of 3-6 months, which would move the Phase 1 user go‑live to late 2026,” the NISTA report says.

Although “system issues have now been resolved,” the “single biggest risk to this is departments being unable to find functional subject matter expert capacity to undertake the high level of testing they have identified as being required, given their low risk appetite.”

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) is leading Matrix. It is joined by the Cabinet Office, Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Department for Business and Trade, Attorney General’s Office, and the Department of Health and Social Care.

Advertisement

His Majesty’s Treasury (HMT) and the Department for Education have delayed their decisions to join Matrix despite the Cabinet Office saying they had “unconditionally bought into joining shared services at the outset” and their “participation in shared services is not optional.”

MPs said last week that their reluctance to join could undermine the project. The Treasury, for example, already uses relatively modern Oracle Fusion SaaS to run its HR and finance functions.

NISTA also rated the Unity shared services project as red, although it said progress had improved. Unity concerns His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs – Britain’s tax collection agency – and two other departments moving to a cloud-based SAP ERP system.

A spokesperson at DSIT told The Register: “Delivery challenges were found in the Matrix Program after a planned review. We have decided to replan the program to make sure we have a realistic and achievable delivery schedule, while continuing work to modernize shared services across government.” 

Advertisement

Officials said the department’s program team is developing the next iteration of the business case for HMT and Cabinet Office approval later this year. It is due to set out a timetable for the next wave of departments and arm’s-length bodies to onboard to the new system and service, including HMT. DSIT remains committed to the program and expects it to offer £1.67 in benefits for every £1 invested. ®

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How One Restorer Brought the Worst Nintendo 3DS XL Back From the Dead

Published

on

Nintendo 3DS XL Restoration
Most people would have tossed the red Nintendo 3DS XL the moment they opened the package. Bought for twenty-seven pounds and already looking like it had spent years outdoors, the handheld arrived with a rusty hinge, a body that bulged open, no battery, and clear signs of serious water damage. Elliot of The Retro Future saw something worth saving instead.



Opening the rear cover reveals actual rust, the kind that takes a long time to accumulate after being left out in the elements, with no artificial “weathering” BS. Some screws were so tight that they required to be loosened using a Dremel, and things only got worse after that. The shoulder button connector has virtually pulled itself apart from the ribbon cable and the board. The SD card reader was shot, with thick clumps of rust caked on the motherboard, which had deformed slightly. The screens were dusty and dirty. The joysticks appeared to belong in a museum of broken pieces. The cameras were in a horrible state. The rubber portions had turned into mush. Threads in the shell had been removed completely. One look at the state of things made it clear how large of a task you were facing.


PlayStation 5 Portal Remote Player – Midnight Black
  • Play Your Game Collection with Remote Play – PlayStation Portal Remote Player can play compatible games you have installed on your PS5 console…
  • Cloud Streaming from the Game Catalog and Classics Catalog – Discover an awesome library of PS5 games on the PlayStation Portal Remote Player with…
  • Cloud Streaming for PS5 Games in Your Library – With PlayStation Plus Premium, stream select digital PS5 games in Your Library from PlayStation Store…

Nintendo 3DS XL Restoration
Cleaning began with a thorough cleaning in an ultrasonic bath with some watch-cleaning solution for the metal components. Shell pieces soaked overnight in a solution of bicarbonate of soda and boiling water. To remove all of the filth, the boards and other pieces required to be scrubbed with hot soapy water and then wiped off with isopropyl alcohol. Vinegar baths and a baking soda paste applied with a toothbrush were required to remove the most persistent corrosion. Some of the chrome plating on the screws had worn so thin that it could no longer be saved, necessitating the replacement of new ones. However, the idea was not to make it look like it had just rolled off the assembly line.

Nintendo 3DS XL Restoration
Almost every critical component needed to be removed and replaced. A replacement motherboard from Japan, which costs roughly £50, was first on the list. New displays, ribbon cables, shoulder buttons, joysticks and covers, volume sliders, cameras, a microphone, a touchscreen, and a new battery came next. Aftermarket shell pieces were necessary to fill in the gaps where the original plastic had nearly collapsed. Small 3D printed tabs replaced the broken light-pipe mounts. Swapping so much out was a matter of practicality. Water-damaged components cannot simply be wiped away.

Nintendo 3DS XL Restoration
Buttons were functional again, and the touchscreen responded to input. The cameras were ready to go now. The left and right triggers had returned to normal. The 3D slider still did not work, which is a shame because it is linked to the aftermarket screen rather than the actual problem. Later on, certain software updates would remove the Japanese region lock, allowing it to play a variety of titles.

Nintendo 3DS XL Restoration
The finished 3DS XL retains the original shell’s weathered appearance, but it now functions like a normal system. Elliot placed it in a clear container, resulting in a great playable console as well as a silent little museum piece, serving as a reminder of what happens when you leave a system out to get wet for months on end. Some of the online restoration videos you see make the broken system appear to be as good as new with just a wash down and some water, but this thing was not going to recover from being left out in the weather for so long. Over time, sun and rain will leave scars.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s leather jacket sells for nearly $1 million at Sotheby’s auction

Published

on


  • Leather jacket belonging to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang sells for $960k, way above the $40-60k estimate
  • Huang’s jackets have become a tech sector icon and a staple CEO ‘uniform’ piece
  • The proceeds wil help fund fellowships and more across tech

A black Tom Ford leather jacket worn and signed by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has sold at a New York auction for $960,000.

“The response to this sale surpassed even our highest expectations,” Sotheby’s head of modern collectibles Brahm Wachter explained, with the jacket selling for around $900,000 more than auctioneers had anticipated, given the auction house’s estimate of $40,000 to $60,000.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Everyone is now an AI company. But here’s the real challenge

Published

on

The “AI” label no longer makes companies special. In today’s world, that is a fact that needs to be accepted.

Even just a year ago, if a business simply mentioned being “AI-powered” it was enough to immediately gather attention and appear innovative. Investors quickly grew excited, and media outlets were quick to pick up the next “hot story.”

Valentina Drofa

Founder and CEO of Drofa Comms.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025