Open-ear earbuds have grown quite popular in recent years, and Samsung has finally decided it wants a piece of the market. The Korean outlet ETNews, citing industry sources, claims that the company is gearing up to launch the Galaxy Buds Able. 

They are believed to be clip-type, open-ear earbuds that hook onto the ear without blocking the canal, and I genuinely believe they could be one of the most interesting audio launches of the year. 

How are the Galaxy Buds Able different?

Samsung’s existing earbuds sit in your ears, sealing the ear canal for effective sound isolation. The Buds Able flips that approach entirely. The clip hooks onto the outer ear, while the canal stays open, and you hear both your podcast and the traffic around you. They should also appeal directly to buyers who aren’t comfortable wearing in-ear earbuds. 

These earbuds are specifically designed for situational awareness. You can use them while running, cycling, commuting, or basically anything where you want to be aware of your surroundings. Instead of bone-conduction, Samsung is going after the more advanced air-conduction route for sidestepping the vibration and sound quality issues. 

The market for such earbuds is growing rapidly. The global open-type headphone and earphone segment is projected to climb from around $3.8 billion last year to about $4.2 billion this year, a $400 million jump that explains why Samsung is on the move.

Who else is chasing the same design?

Along with Samsung, Xiaomi is also moving in that direction. The company has already released official images of its first clip-type earbuds, which feature a satin gold design with a high-gloss unibody, and a transparent spherical speaker section.

Per the report, Xiaomi could announce its first open-ear product sometime this month. Meanwhile, Huawei FreeClip, Bose Ultra Open Earbuds, Sony LinkBuds Clip, and Anker Soundcore AeroClip are already doing well. 

Samsung Galaxy Buds Able don’t have a launch date yet, which is the disappointing part. However, they could arrive sometime this year.

Google Health 5.0 is rolling out now as a mandatory update for the Fitbit app users, and the timing is deliberate. 

The new Fitbit Air, Google’s most direct competitor to the Whoop fitness tracking band, launches next week, and, if you haven’t already guessed it, Health 5.0 is required to set it up. 

What is the new Google Health widget?

Until now, the Fitbit home screen widget was a single, circular steps counter. The new Quick Access widget replaces it with something that could prove more useful. At its largest, the widget expands to a 5×3 grid, letting you check up to six fitness metrics at the same time. 

You can set the grid to showcase the most important stats: steps, distance, sleep, hydration, weight, readiness, or whichever stats you’ve configured. At its smallest, the widget collapses to show just one stat. 

To access full stats, you can simply tap on a tile. Then there’s a heart icon in the top-left that opens Google Health, a refresh button on the right, and the last update time sits in the centre, so you always know how fresh or stale the data is. 

The Quick Access widget mirrors exactly what you’ve set in the Today tab, which means the widget and the app stay in sync. 

What the update doesn’t tell you

According to Lifehacker’s hands-on review, the Gemini-powered Health Coach, the feature Google is promoting aggressively, has a hallucination problem.

While the Health Coach congratulated a tester for achieving a sleep score of 99, the actual score was 85. The coach also referenced irrelevant Reddit threads as sources, at least one of which had an answer copied from ChatGPT. 

Beyond the AI hallucination issues, several popular Fitbit features aren’t a part of the update, including sleep animals, the Community Feed, Groups, direct messaging between users, food plans with calorie targets, and stress-check graphs.

Finally, features that were available for free during the Public Preview, including chat with the Health Coach and personalized fitness plans now require a Google Health Premium membership, which costs $9.99 a month or $99.99 a year. 

The Google Health 5.0 rollout began May 19 and should reach full availability by May 26, 2026.

Only 15% of workers in Singapore feel safe from job cuts

Singapore workers rank among the least confident in the world about their job security—and the numbers are stark. Just 15% of employees feel their role is safe from elimination, according to ADP Research’s latest People at Work report.

Only four other markets rank lower than Singapore. In Europe, only 12% of workers in the Czech Republic feel secure in their jobs, while the remaining three are all in APAC—Taiwan (11%), South Korea (9%), and Japan, dead last at just 5%.

While Singapore ranked low, the broader region fared only slightly better, with just 18% of respondents across APAC saying they believed their jobs were safe from elimination. Globally, the figure stood at 22%.

This comes despite worldwide unemployment remaining at its lowest level in decades.

Jessica Zhang, Senior Vice President of APAC at ADP, said the results point to a disconnect between current labour market conditions and employees’ perceptions of their long-term job security.

“In Singapore, employees are not thinking about whether they have a job today, but also whether their roles will remain relevant tomorrow. This growing uncertainty is becoming a defining feature of today’s workforce,” she said in a statement.

The executive stressed the importance of clearer communication and continued upskilling efforts as concerns over job security grow.

Zhang said employers should be more transparent about how roles are changing, what those shifts mean for employees, and invest in ongoing training to help workers stay employable while boosting productivity and efficiency.

Long hours, low engagement

Singapore workers also reported high levels of unpaid overtime.

Overall, 45% of workers in Singapore said they clocked more than five unpaid hours a week, with 35% saying they put in between six and 15 unpaid hours each week, while another 10% said they worked 16 or more unpaid hours weekly.

The proportion of workers doing six to 15 unpaid hours exceeded the APAC average of 30%, while the share working 16 or more unpaid hours was in line with the regional average of 10%.

At the same time, Singapore recorded relatively high levels of generative AI adoption. Around 23% of workers said they used AI almost every day, while just 8% said they had never tried the technology.

Despite this, employee engagement levels in Singapore remained relatively low. Fully engaged workers accounted for 12% of the workforce in both 2024 and 2025, below the APAC average of 15%.

ADP Research’s People at Work report gathered responses from more than 39,000 adult workers in 36 markets between Jul 21 and Aug 4, 2025.

In APAC, the survey covered 13,136 respondents across multiple markets, including Singapore, Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam.

• Read the full report here.
• Read other articles we’ve written on Singapore’s current affairs here.

Featured Image Credit: TK Kurikawa/ Shutterstock.com

Security

‘Budgets are moral documents,’ Rep. Delia Ramirez said

Democratic lawmakers on Thursday blasted President Trump’s spending priorities – specifically a proposed $1 billion White House security and ballroom project and a nearly $1.8 billion “slush fund” for Trump allies tied to the January 6 Capitol riot – as his administration pushes deep cuts to cybersecurity funding.

US Representative Delia Ramirez (D-IL) decried the president’s priorities as Congress weighs reauthorization of the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP), a funding effort that began in 2022 and earmarked $1 billion to state and local governments over the next four years to help mitigate cyber risks. 

“Budgets are moral documents, and spending a billion dollars on a ballroom, which is what the president wants, or $1.7 billion to incentivize insurrectionists while we still are waiting for the reauthorization of this critical grant program, says a lot about where priorities are right now with this administration,” she said during a House Homeland Security subcommittee hearing on state and local cybersecurity.

Another Democrat on the committee, Rep. James Walkinshaw (D-VA), noted the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) also eliminated federal support for the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC), which used to provide free and low-cost threat detection and response services to state and local governments. 

The MS-ISAC has since shifted to a fee-based model to support the state threat sharing program. 

This means, as expert witness Samir Jain, VP of policy for the Center for Democracy and Technology, testified, “jurisdictions that most need the help are least likely to be able to afford it. Smaller jurisdictions, because if they don’t have the resources and the money to join the ISAC, they probably also don’t have the resources and the money to buy equipment, to buy network monitoring tools, to have cybersecurity staff. It’s the ones who need it the most are the least likely to be able to get it as a result.” 

Walkinshaw also pointed out that CISA’s 2025 budget was about $3 billion. President Trump proposed slashing the cyber-defense agency’s spending by $707 million in 2027, to just over $2 billion. 

This is on top of the $135 million in cuts to CISA, along with about a third of its workforce (close to 1,000 people) since Trump returned to office. 

“So we are looking at a one-third cut in federal funding for cybersecurity,” Walkinshaw said. “If President Trump gets his way, we’d be spending a billion dollars for the ballroom and $1.8 billion for the January 6 slush fund – $2.8 billion just on those two items, $800 million more than his total commitment to cybersecurity.”

Meanwhile, other expert witnesses who testified before the committee, all IT and security chiefs from Tennessee, New York, and Florida, implored the lawmakers to spend more – not less – on state and local infosec.

“State and local governments operate critical systems that citizens rely on every day, including emergency services, schools, utilities, courts, and public infrastructure,” Tennessee CIO Kristin Darby told lawmakers. 

“Those systems are increasingly targeted by criminal organizations and nation-state actors,” she said, adding that “demand for cybersecurity support far exceeds the current funding levels.”

As AI-enabled attacks, ransomware infections, and cloud-based system intrusions accelerate across Tennessee, “many local governments across our state have little or no dedicated cybersecurity staff,” Darby continued. “This creates a dangerous imbalance between highly sophisticated attackers and severely resource-constrained defenders.”

New York state director of security and intelligence Colin Ahern urged lawmakers to “reauthorize and fully fund the state and local cybersecurity grant program, which is the single most consequential investment in the cyber protection of state and local governments in this country.”

He also advocated for frontier-model AI access for state and local governments, which are tasked with protecting the power grid, drinking water supply, public health systems, and other critical operations. 

“We cannot do that while frontier defensive AI capabilities are restricted to federal partners and a handful of large enterprises,” Ahern said. 

“Cybersecurity is the silent partner of democracy,” he continued. “When the utilities, school districts, and state and local governments that constitute the operational fabric of American life are hollowed out by cyber attacks, the institutions that support our democratic life are hollowed out with them.” ®

Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun had a straightforward reason for why the YU7 wasn’t outselling the Tesla Model Y in China: the base model wasn’t cheap enough. 

At just 10,000 yuan ($1,450) less than Tesla’s Model Y, the price gap simply wasn’t compelling enough. On the evening of May 21, at Xiaomi’s “Human x Car x Home” launch event, Lei did something about it (via CarNewsChina).

Introducing the Xiaomi YU7 Standard Edition

The new True Standard Edition is priced at 233,500 yuan, about  $34,300, which makes it 30,000 yuan ($4,350) cheaper than the standard rear-wheel-drive Model Y. 

While that price gap should be enough, the more interesting number is the range figure. The YU7 lasts up to 399 miles on a single charge, compared to 368 miles for the equivalent Model Y variant. 

To put it simply, Xiaomi is offering more range for substantially less money, which, in China’s super-competitive EV market, is as direct a challenge as a company can issue.

What changed under the hood?

The YU7 True Standard Edition sports a rear-wheel-drive single-motor setup that produces 235kW, with a CATL-supplied lithium iron phosphate battery. 

Dimensionally it maintains the YU7’s mid-to-large SUV proportions at five meters long. However, it comes in 253 pounds lighter than the previous standard version at 4,850 pounds. 

As for why Xiaomi is doing this right now, the company wants to regain lost sales momentum. The YU7 arrived on June 18, 2025 at prices below $48,500 and secured over 200,000 orders within three minutes, creating a waitlist that stretched nearly a year. 

That backlog has since cleared, and with it, the sales momentum. The company sold fewer than 10,000 units last month, a significant drop from the launch frenzy, and, as a result, the company has launched the new Standard Edition. 

Most users can start generating slides with AI today.