Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

Musing On AI From 1964

Published

on

[Irving John Good] was at Trinity College, Oxford back in 1964. His paper, “Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine” could have been a topic for today, as we deal with machines that aren’t really ultraintelligent, but appear smart and think they are even smarter. He starts off with a bold thesis: “The survival of man depends on the early construction of an ultraintelligent machine.”

He also admits that we’ll need to understand more about the human brain and human thought to make a breakthrough. This is still true today. However, we still don’t fully understand how our brains work, but it seems unlikely that we are just super-large LLMs. Not that [Good] anticipated the modern chatbot. Perhaps his comments will apply more to a future AI software that actually thinks like a human, if there will ever be such a thing.

Then again, there are many parallels. One theme in the paper is that a smart machine will design a smarter machine. Unless, of course, it is afraid of being replaced. If a machine were actually sentient, what are the ethics of turning it off and tearing it apart?

Advertisement

It is hard to be a visionary. [Good] remarks that by 1980, progress in human/computer symbiosis will encourage more investment in the field and that by that time, there would be “great advances in microminiaturization” and “frequencies of one billion pulses per second,” might be common in “large computers.”

We love reading what smart people thought the future might be like. What will the world be like in another 60 or 100 years?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Is A Roku Still Worth Buying In 2026?

Published

on





While smart TVs have become the standard for households across the U.S., some people prefer to stick to regular models, or “dumb” TVs. But there are ways to turn an old dumb TV into a smart TV and one of the most popular solutions is the Roku streaming stick. Because there are so many streaming options out there, it’s worth looking at what Roku offers and if it still stands out among the rest.

Roku streaming players start at a very affordable $29.99, making it an appealing option if you want to upgrade without having to replace your existing TV. Roku is also easy to set up, along with thousands of apps that cover everything from sports to news and more, including the best TV streaming apps. Certain models also have handy features like voice search, customizable recommendations, and support for casting from other devices. Independent testing and reviews continue to place Roku among the top streaming devices available in 2026.

But Roku is changing how the platform works, with a bigger focus on advertising and personalized recommendations. While Roku says these changes make it easier for viewers to find content, the increased ad presence has negatively impacted the streaming experience for some consumers. Roku owners have complained about hardware reliability and customer service as well, creating frustration for some long-time users. In the end, Roku is still worth buying for its value and capability, but it’s important to understand the trade-offs before making that purchase.

Advertisement

The next era of Roku streaming

The future of Roku streaming may look very different after Fox’s $22 billion acquisition of the company. The deal was announced in June of 2026, and it’s expected to bring together Fox’s live sports, news, and entertainment content with the Roku streaming platform, the Roku Channel, and connected TV technology. Both companies state their merger will create a larger media platform, with access to over 100 million global streaming households. Advertising and content distribution opportunities are both expected to expand as a result.

The acquisition could also change how Roku users interact with the platform moving forward. While Roku and Fox have both said the service will remain open to other partners, the deal gives Fox control over both produced content and the platform itself. This could possibly lead to deeper integration between the two companies, including changes to content recommendations or app placement. However, the full impact of this merger will likely not be felt until everything is finalized.

Advertisement

In terms of what Roku users should expect in the short-term, the deal is not expected to close until 2027. This means that current devices should continue to operate normally, at least for now. But once the merger is finalized, the most obvious way to know if changes have been implemented is through the home screen. If Fox takes more real estate on the screen, or if advertising expands beyond what it is now, it could be due to the new deal.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Top Gun Pilot Names His Favorite Fighter Jet, And It’s Not The F-35

Published

on





The United States military has operated a large number of fighter jets since the Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star took to the skies in 1945. Pilots have flown many of the U.S.’ fighter jets over the years. That includes the select few who attend the U.S. Navy Strike Fighter Tactics Instructor program (SFTI), better known to the outside world as “Top Gun. As you can imagine, every pilot has their favorite fighter.

It’s not uncommon for a fighter jet pilot to operate multiple aircraft throughout their careers, giving them a taste of what’s available. A well-respected and publicly known TOPGUN graduate, Lt. Col. (Ret) David “Chip” Berke, sat with Business Insider, where he explained that his favorite aircraft to fly isn’t the F-35 Lightning II, as most might suspect. Instead, he pointed to the stealthiest fighter jet in the inventory, the F-22 Raptor, the F-35’s predecessor and the world’s first fifth-generation fighter jet to enter service.

Advertisement

Berke served for 23 years in the U.S. Marine Corps, where he graduated from Top Gun, worked as an instructor, and served in combat operations, flying an F/A-18 over Iraq and Afghanistan. Throughout his career, Berke flew the F-16 Fighting Falcon, F/A-18 Hornet, F-22, and F-35, giving him the experience to make a determination as to the best fighter jet to fly. As it happens, Berke was also the first Marine chosen to fly the F-22 Raptor, as the aircraft isn’t operated by the USMC; it belongs to the U.S. Air Force.

Advertisement

David Chip Berke’s preference — the F-22 Raptor

Berke’s ability to fly the F-22 as a Marine opened doors for him, but he was also the first operational pilot qualified to fly the F-35B, which is the variant designated for the U.S. Navy and USMC. He flew that aircraft at the end of his career, and prior to it, he became one of the first USMC pilots to fly the F-16 at Top Gun. Before that, Berke flew the F-22 for almost 4 years.

When asked which plane he prefers, Berke said, “The short, easy answer is the F-22 Raptor is a unique aircraft. Getting to fly that was amazing, and it really doesn’t have a real equal in the world that it operates.” Despite his favorite pick, Berke didn’t dismiss the other jets he flew, calling the F/A-18 his “first love,” as it was his first operational aircraft and the one he flew into combat on multiple occasions. When describing the F-22, Berke smiles, recalling its amazing capabilities with a specific focus on its thrust vectoring.

This allows the F-22 to carry out all kinds of airborne acrobatics, including cartwheels and pedal turns, which seemingly defy the laws of physics. He went on to call the F-22 “pure fun. It is just the most ridiculous thing…I loved flying the F-22. The most fun you could ever have in an airplane is that jet.” Despite his preference, the F-22 is an incredibly expensive aircraft, which is why the U.S. only put 186 into operation. As of writing, it still flies, but the roles it was meant to fill are instead going to the F-35.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Best External Hard Drives (2026): SSD to Store Data, Video, and More

Published

on

LaCie claims read/write speeds of up to 6,700 MB/s and 5,300 MB/s, which it says are adequate for real-time editing of 8K and 6K RAW footage. In testing the highest speeds, file transfers were 5,787 MB/s read and 5,188 MB/s write—which, while not quite matching the claim, still make it far and away the fastest drive in this guide. But raw speeds are just numbers for spreadsheets; I was more interested in real-world performance. Since I happened to also be testing the Nikon Z6III (8/10, WIRED Recommends), which can shoot 6K ProRes RAW, I loaded a good bit of footage on the Pro5 and was indeed able to edit using DaVinci Resolve Studio.

The downside here is the price. This started off at $600 for the 4-TB version (which is the minimum you’d want for working with ProRes RAW video files). That was already pricey, but these days that’s climbed to insane heights ($1,600 as of this update), making it a less compelling value. Still, if you need the speed, this is the drive to get.

Best USB4 Drive

Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

If you don’t yet have any devices with Thunderbolt 5 support, this Thunderbolt 4 drive would be my recommendation for anyone obsessed with speed. Corsair’s EX400U is an impressive little drive, consistently delivering speeds of around 3,800 MB/s for sequential read and and 3,550 MB/s write. Again, this is only going to be possible if you have a device that supports USB4/Thunderbolt 4 (including recent MacBooks, Dell XPS, and others—see our guide to the best laptops for more). Technically, just as I was wrapping up this update, LaCie’s new rugged SSD came out, which beat this drive in my tests by about 10 MB/s, but this drive is smaller, lighter, and cheaper.

Advertisement

I also like that Corsair has included a MagSafe connector on the back of the case, which makes it a great option for backing up ProRes video footage from your iPhone. Also, this little drive’s price, so far, hasn’t shot up into the stratosphere.

Best for Photographers

Silver square-shaped Crucial X9 external hard drive with angled corner edges sitting on dark wood surface

Photograph: Scott Gilbertson

Crucial’s X9 Pro hits the sweet spot of speed, portability, and price to become one of the best drives out there for photographers looking to make backups in the field. These drives are tiny, about half the size of a deck of cards, and weigh a mere 1.3 ounces. They’ll connect to just about anything. I tested the X9 Pro on Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, and iOS and never hit any issues with any of them. When it comes to speed, the X9 Pro claims symmetrical read and write speeds, at 1,050 MB/s. I actually consistently got higher speeds, up to 1,110 MB/s for read and 1,100 MB/s for write. That puts the X9 Pro at the top of the pack in terms of portable drive speed.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Semi-Trailer Trucks Test Converting Into Plug-In Hybrids

Published

on

Long-time Slashdot reader necro81 writes: There are several companies, such as Tesla, trying to make semi trucks fully electric. The capital cost for such a truck, and the MW-scale infrastructure to recharge it, may be a hard sell for some operators. [IEEE Spectrum notes that’s a charging infrastructure “that most freight corridors do not yet reliably provide.”] But some companies are instead adding batteries and an electric motor to the semi-trailers that trucks haul behind them.

“The Nivalis Powered Trailer Kit centers on an electric axle [rated at 50 kilowatts-peak]… capable of both propulsion assistance and regenerative braking. It draws on a 60-kilowatt-hour, 400-volt lithium-ion battery pack charged from three sources: the axle itself during braking and deceleration, a full-rooftop array of photovoltaic panels generating up to 3.7 kilowatts-peak, and a 32-amp, three-phase AC grid connection available during parking stops.”

This approach is more akin to a plug-in hybrid: the truck may still be diesel-powered, but the electric assist from the trailer allows the truck to run more efficiently. Replacing diesel with kWh can save operators money while also reducing emissions. This incremental approach may be more accessible and less capital-intensive than replacing the truck itself.
From the article:

The driver’s only window into the system is a small display readable from the cab’s side mirror that shows the system status and battery charge level. Nothing about the trailer’s handling or licensing requirements changes. The partners project savings of up to 7,000 liters of diesel per trailer per year, which is enough to keep about 19 tonnes of carbon dioxide out of the air…

Trailer Dynamics, an Aachen-based company, has conducted field tests with BMW Logistics, DB Schenker, Duvenbeck, and Volkswagen Konzernlogistik, reporting average fuel savings of around 40% for diesel tractor combinations, substantially higher than the up to 18% reduction implied by the Nivalis projection… Trailer Dynamics prices its system between €145,000 and €195,000 and targets a payback period of no more than five years. Nivalis targets five to six years at current costs.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

HiberTec Homes Lower Themselves Underground to Survive Wildfires and Tornadoes

Published

on

HiberTec Homes Hydraulic Underground Disaster-Proof
Wildfires and tornadoes destroy thousands of homes across the United States every year. Insurance carriers have begun stepping away from entire regions because the risks keep climbing. Families face the choice of expensive rebuilds or walking away from everything they built. A California company named HiberTec Homes developed a different response. Their houses do not fight the flames or winds at ground level, they simply move out of the way.



From the street, the homes appear to be any typical modern building, with clean lines, large windows, and varied materials that give off a highly contemporary vibe, suitable for a variety of communities. One model opts for a single-story configuration of approximately 1,600 square feet with three bedrooms. The larger variants are two floors tall and around 2,500 or 4,000 square feet. Rather than starting from scratch each time, builders can modify an existing modular home design to operate with this technology.

When danger calls, it all begins with a tap on a smartphone app, as is intended. Part of this patented method is the automatic separation of power, water, and gas lines, ensuring that nothing is left attached when you move the house. Hydraulic columns then step in to support the entire structure and guide it down into the pre-built subsurface vault. Gravity helps with this, and there are some backup power sources as well as a manual winch on standby in case the main power goes out. The journey from street level to safe place takes approximately 15 minutes.

HiberTec Homes Hydraulic Underground Disaster Proof
As it descends, a fireproof spray is released around the property, adding to the level of protection. When the house reaches the end of its journey, a large heavy-duty cover emerges, sealing the vault with some highly fire-resistant material. The house and all of its belongings are now safely tucked away below ground level, protected from temperatures that can exceed 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit and last for days.

HiberTec Homes Hydraulic Underground Disaster Proof
The underground vault is designed to withstand conditions that would be too extreme for standard fireproof construction. Some surface materials may be able to withstand brief exposure to temperatures as high as 850 degrees, but this technology ensures that the house never has to encounter such temperatures in the first place. Tornado-force winds and their accompanying debris lose their objective the moment the house is underground. Homeowners continue to follow evacuation orders because the vault is designed to protect the property, not the people inside, and they may return later to find everything completely intact.

HiberTec Homes Hydraulic Underground Disaster Proof
The starting price for this system is roughly $1,200 per square foot, before you even consider the excavation and site preparation charges, which will be slightly more. Even the smallest model will cost over $2 million or more, depending on your location and soil conditions. As production scales up, the company intends to reduce the cost to around $500 per square foot. To get this system to work, you need stable ground and a water table that is not too high. Unfortunately, most existing homes are unsuitable since the vault and associated hydraulics must be incorporated into the foundation from the beginning.

HiberTec Homes Hydraulic Underground Disaster Proof
There are three utility patents that cover the basic ideas: one for moving the structure, one for the retractable cover system, and one for safely disconnecting and reconnecting utilities. The entire creation process took over 5 years, with a team of engineers and architects on board. Later on, they intend to build a full-scale prototype near Los Angeles to demonstrate the entire system in operation under real-world conditions.
[Source]

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

What Are Your Plans For AI Appreciation Day?

Published

on

The best way to celebrate AI Appreciation Day is to not.

It’s AI Appreciation Day on July 16 and we’re all left wondering who asked for this. In name, it’s about as serious as the marketing stunts that gave us gems like National Hot Dog Day or National Doughnut Day. In practice, the day calls for the intentional recognition of “the most consequential technology in human history” instead of simply claiming some free food like with other fake holidays. While we can acknowledge the impact that AI has made on society and industries so far, it doesn’t warrant its own day of dedication.

Going off the website, the proper way to celebrate AI Appreciation Day includes suggestions like “thank a person who builds or maintains AI,” “talk to a child or skeptic about it,” “sign the pledge and put the day on your calendar.” As satirical as these ideas sound, they’re apparently very much real recommendations. 

We should be embracing the human experience instead of celebrating this AI slop of an excuse for a holiday. Instead of putting AI front and center for a day, you can support a local artist by buying some of their work, you can swim in a natural body of water before it’s forever impacted by data centers powering AI or you can catch up with old friends instead of burning through tokens with an AI chatbot. These are just a few tangible things that we should be appreciating on July 16, instead of AI.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

What are Copilot+ PCs? Everything you need to know

Published

on

Walk through a laptop aisle in 2026 and the Copilot+ PC branding is highlight for most Windows laptops. From Microsoft’s own surface to other PC makers like Samsung, HP, and Dell, you can find notebooks that carry this badge to convey that they are AI-ready. At a glance, the name sounds like it refers to a computer with a better version of the Copilot chatbot, which only explains a small part of it.

A Copilot+ PC is a Windows 11 computer that meets Microsoft’s hardware standard for advanced on-device AI features like a compatible processor with a dedicated NPU. You also need a certain amount of RAM and storage, all of which brings access to Windows features such as Recall, Click to Do, and much more. Many of these experiences use the NPU to process information locally, reducing their reliance on cloud servers and helping them run more efficiently in the background.

The badge has expanded considerably since the first Copilot+ laptops arrived in June 2024. Snapdragon X processors were initially the only option. Current models can also use qualifying AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra chips, giving buyers a choice between Arm and conventional x86 Windows systems. So here’s everything you need to know.

What is a Copilot+ PC?

Copilot+ is Microsoft’s certification for a class of Windows 11 AI PCs. A qualifying computer combines a sufficiently powerful NPU with Microsoft’s minimum memory and storage requirements. The Copilot app itself does not require this hardware. A regular Windows 11 PC can still access Microsoft Copilot since it relies on an internet connection. On the other hand, Copilot+ systems gain a separate set of Windows features designed around local AI processing.

It is also worth noting that buying a Copilot+ PC also does not automatically include a premium Copilot or Microsoft 365 subscription. Most built-in Windows experiences are part of the operating system, however, certain actions and connected services may require an account, internet access, or an additional subscription.

Advertisement

Copilot+ PC hardware requirements

Component Minimum requirement
Processor Compatible chip or system-on-chip with a 40+TOPS NPU
Memory 16GB DDR5 or LPDDR5
Storage 256GB SSD or UFS
Operating system Windows 11, with current Copilot+ experiences requiring supported updates

As of right now, Microsoft has currently named these processor familiar as compatible:

  • AMD Ryzen AI 300 and 400 series
  • Intel Core Ultra 200 and 300 series
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon X series

A processor carrying one of those broader family names does not guarantee that every configuration supports every feature. Buyers should still look for the actual Copilot+ PC badge and check the manufacturer’s specifications.

What are TOPS, and why do you need an NPU?

Copilot+ PCs are all about AI. However, this was one of the biggest problems with previous-gen AI PCs. They had NPUs, yes, but little to do with them.The NPU is a dedicated part of the processor built to handle AI workloads efficiently. CPUs and GPUs can also run AI models, but the NPU is designed for sustained jobs such as background effects, image analysis, speech processing, and semantic search without placing the same load on the main processor or graphics hardware.

Microsoft measures the minimum NPU requirement in TOPS, short for trillion operations per second. A Copilot+ system needs at least 40 TOPS of NPU performance. This number only describes one part of the computer. It does not tell you how fast the CPU is, or how well it can run games. So two systems carrying the same Copilot+ badge can deliver very different everyday performance.

AI PC versus Copilot+ PC

“AI PC” is a flexible industry term. Manufacturers commonly use it for computers with an NPU or other hardware intended to accelerate AI tasks. Copilot+ PC is Microsoft’s more tightly defined category. Every Copilot+ computer is an AI PC, while many systems marketed as AI PCs fall below Microsoft’s 40TOPS requirement or lack access to the complete Copilot+ feature set. A great example of this is an older Intel Core Ultra laptop, which may advertise an NPU and AI features, while missing the Copilot+ badge because its NPU does not meet Microsoft’s threshold.

Are all Copilot+ PCs Arm computers?

No. The first Copilot+ systems used Qualcomm’s Arm-based Snapdragon X processors, which made the category look closely tied to Windows on Arm. Intel and AMD have since added qualifying x86 chips. But compatibility isn’t consistent. While Snapdragon models can offer strong responsiveness and battery efficiency, Windows 11 uses Microsoft’s Prism emulator to run many x86 and x64 applications that do not have native Arm versions.

What AI features do Copilot+ PCs include?

Microsoft’s Copilot+ feature list has grown considerably since launch. Availability can vary by processor, region, language, account type, and Windows update. So here are the highlights:

Advertisement

Recall

Recall creates an optional, searchable timeline using snapshots of activity on your screen. You can describe a document, webpage, image, or app you remember seeing and search through the saved timeline to locate it. Microsoft continues to label Recall as a preview.

Click to Do

Click to Do analyzes selected text and images on the screen, then offers relevant actions. Depending on the content, it may let you copy text, summarize or rewrite it, search the web, remove an image background, blur a background, or open the selection in another app. Some actions require a subscription.

Improved Windows Search

Improved Windows Search uses semantic indexing so you can find supported files and images through natural descriptions. Searching for “team at the conference” can work without knowing the exact filename. It appears in File Explorer, the Windows search box, and supported Settings searches.

Agent in Settings

Agent in Settings lets you describe a Windows problem or setting in ordinary language. It can surface the relevant option and, for supported changes, help apply it. Microsoft expanded the feature’s language support in 2026.

Live Captions with translation

Windows 11 already supports Live Captions. Copilot+ systems add local translation from more than 40 languages into English and from supported languages into Simplified Chinese.

Advertisement

Creative and accessibility tools

Copilot+ PCs also support AI tools across Paint, Photos, Snipping Tool, Voice Access, Narrator, and Windows Studio Effects. These include Cocreator, Restyle Image, Image Creator, Super Resolution, Perfect Screenshot, flexible voice commands, richer image descriptions, background blur, eye contact, automatic framing, and voice focus.

Some tools still have processor restrictions. Automatic Super Resolution, Paint Generative Fill, and Photos Relight currently list Snapdragon X requirements on Microsoft’s feature page.

Is Recall private?

Recall attracted heavy criticism when Microsoft first announced it, which led the company to delay its broad release and redesign the security model. This concern was also reflected in our own experience with the feature. The current version is opt-in and requires Windows Hello Enhanced Sign-in Security with biometric authentication. Snapshots are encrypted, stored locally, and tied to the individual Windows profile. Microsoft says it cannot access them, and other apps cannot retrieve the Recall database.

Sensitive-information filtering is enabled by default to help avoid saving passwords, payment details, and identification numbers. Users can pause snapshots, delete them, limit storage, and exclude specific apps or websites. Recall can also be removed as an optional Windows component.

Storage is another consideration. Microsoft says Recall needs at least 50GB of free space to operate. A 256GB system allocates 25GB to snapshots by default, which Microsoft estimates can retain about three months of activity. Older snapshots are deleted once the allocation fills.

Advertisement

Are Copilot+ PCs faster and more efficient?

Microsoft markets Copilot+ systems as its fastest and longest-lasting Windows PCs. Its commissioned testing has claimed up to 22 hours of local video playback and 15 hours of web browsing on selected devices. Those figures vary with the processor, display, battery size, workload, settings, and manufacturer. But these figures are often seen in marketing material for recent high-end laptops.

The Copilot+ badge itself is not a performance ranking. Qualcomm systems often prioritize efficiency, AMD offers great integrated graphics and strong multi-core performance, while new Intel Core Ultra processors can either focus on battery life or strong raw horsepower. So traditional specifications are still important.

Should you buy a Copilot+ PC?

A Copilot+ PC branding alone isn’t enough to justify a purchase, but if you’re looking for a high-end or upper mid-range model, chances are you’re going to get one anyway. Only the entry level models rely on processors based on older architecture that don’t get the shiny new NPUs. Another limitation currently is with RAM capacities. Owing to the RAMmageddon, 8GB machines are returning, so if you’re on a tight budget, Copilot+ PCs might be a little too expensive.

Regardless, you’re not missing out on much–at least for now that is. AI tools like Recall or Click to Do can be handy, but they won’t radically change the way you use or experience your Windows PC. I have a Copilot+ PC of my own, but I hardly ever found myself using these features.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Uber’s Autonomous Vehicle Strategy: Slow Their Adoption

Published

on

A decade ago, then-Uber CEO Travis Kalanick said he saw autonomous vehicles as an existential threat to the ride-hail company’s business model.

“What would happen if we weren’t a part of that future? If we weren’t part of the autonomy thing? Then the future passes us by,” Kalanick told Business Insider.

In the years since, Uber has settled on a strategy that, rather than see it build and operate its own self-driving cars, puts it on track to become the place where riders can get connected with any ride, driven by a human or robot. “We think there are going to be many AV players around the world, and we want to be the go-to commercial platform for all of them,” now-CEO Dara Khosrowshahi told investors in 2024. Since then, the company has signed agreements with more than 25 major robotaxi players, with driverless vehicles from Waymo, Nuro, Baidu, and Volkswagen’s MOIA either available or soon to be available on the Uber app in several global cities.

Now, according to documents viewed by WIRED and another obtained through a public records request, Uber’s lobbyists are pushing to build that strategy into law. The company’s representatives have pressed lawmakers to deploy autonomous vehicles on what it calls “hybrid networks,” where human drivers work alongside robots as the new tech grows.

Advertisement

In New Jersey, a lobbyist representing Uber took the strategy a step further, circulating legislative language that would, for a period of three years, require any platform offering driverless ride-hailing services to have human drivers serve 85 percent of its rides.

The language would likely prevent self-driving vehicle developers, including Waymo, Zoox, and Tesla, from operating their own ride-hail apps in the state—effectively forcing them onto another ride-hail app if they hope to enter the market and limiting competition for Uber, the country’s reigning ride-hail leader.

A representative for Uber pitched a version of the proposal to New Jersey state senator Andrew Zwicker, according to his chief of staff, Ayla Rios. Zwicker is the sponsor of a bill currently being considered by the state legislature that would establish New Jersey’s first set of rules governing self-driving cars on public roads. The Uber lobbyists’ proposed language restricting standalone robotaxi-hailing apps is not currently part of the bill, which could come up for a vote this fall.

The New Jersey bill is the first proposed in the nation that would limit the operation of Tesla’s robotaxis, because it requires AV developers to use multiple sensors to power its software, rather than just cameras, as Tesla’s technology does. It would also require vehicles to be operated in emergencies using steering wheels and brake pedals, which purpose-built robotaxis like those from Zoox do not have.

Advertisement

In Washington, DC, where autonomous vehicle developers, including Waymo, are engaged in a pitched, months-long battle to allow robotaxi services to operate in the district, Uber representatives also sought to ensure that “hybrid networks” would be the future of ride-hail.

A bill introduced by city council member Charles Allen in April would allow driverless services on DC’s public roads under certain conditions. In an email sent more than a week before the introduction of the legislation and obtained by WIRED through a public records request, Uber lobbyist LáVita Gardner thanked an Allen staffer for committing to allowing ride-hail companies like Uber to participate in the district’s autonomous vehicle program. “Allowing for hybrid networks will be critical for a smooth transition that supports both technology and human drivers,” Gardner wrote. (The DC bill will be the subject of a hearing on Monday, and has not yet come up for a vote.)

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

NYT Strands hints and answers for Monday, July 13 (game #862)

Published

on

Looking for a different day?

A new NYT Strands puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Sunday’s puzzle instead then click here: NYT Strands hints and answers for Sunday, July 12 (game #861).

Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.

Want more word-based fun? Then check out my NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games, and Marc’s Wordle today page for the original viral word game.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

‘Billionaire Exodus? California Drew 10x More Venture Capital Than Any Other State This Year’

Published

on

California drew more than $335 billion in venture capital funding this year, reports the Los Angeles Times, citing data released Thursday by PitchBook on private market funding:

Its next biggest competitor, New York, raised less than a tenth of California’s total. Texas raised 1/40th of the amount… Although a campaign for a new tax on billionaires has convinced some ultra-rich residents to shift to other states and businesses often complain that high property and energy costs and an anti-business regulatory regime make it too tough to make money in the state, the inability of the top talent, companies and investors in AI to set up elsewhere shows California’s enduring attraction.

The state’s economy grew 5% last year to a record $4.25 trillion, making it larger than every country other than the U.S., China and Germany. It is home to nearly 400 billion-dollar startups — more than any other state, according to CB Insights… Among metropolitan regions, Los Angeles ranked behind only Silicon Valley and New York, which attracted $98 billion and $11.5 billion in venture investment, respectively… Investors poured in nearly $8 billion across 207 deals in the Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Santa Ana metro areas, up 28% from a year earlier, according to PitchBook…

Nearly 90% of invested dollars [in California] went to AI firms, up from last year, when around 65% of new funds were allocated to AI. “If you’re a tech company and you’re not an AI company, you have a very, very difficult opportunity ahead of you to raise capital,” Stanford said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025