A federal judge has refused to overturn a jury’s finding that Elon Musk defrauded Twitter investors during his $44bn takeover of the platform in 2022. US District Judge Charles Breyer denied Musk’s motion to set aside the verdict in most respects on Monday.

A San Francisco jury ruled in March that two of Musk’s May 2022 tweets about the deal and Twitter’s spam bot numbers were materially false or misleading. Investors say the resulting losses could support damages of up to $2.6bn.

“Buyer’s remorse is not an exception to the securities laws,” Breyer wrote, adding that the laws are “in their essence, about trust”. The judge found substantial evidence that Musk’s 13 May tweet, claiming the deal was on hold pending bot data, was literally untrue.

Breyer cited testimony from one of Musk’s own bankers, who said the tweet surprised her and that Musk never actually put the deal on hold. A jury could infer Musk had a motive to escape the deal and used bots as a pretext, the judge wrote.

He did hand Musk one narrow win, agreeing there was too little evidence that a separate 17 May tweet caused investors a market loss. Musk’s lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The bot pretext, four years on

The case traces back to Musk’s chaotic pursuit of Twitter, when he agreed to buy the company, then tried to walk away citing spam accounts. Twitter sued to force the deal through, and Musk ultimately closed at $54.20 a share before renaming the platform X.

Investors sued in October 2022, arguing Musk deliberately talked the stock down to renegotiate or exit. The jury agreed he misled the market, though it rejected the broader claim that he ran a deliberate scheme.

Breyer also swatted down Musk’s more colourful arguments, including a claim that jurors mocked him by writing “$4.20” in blue ink on the verdict form. The number references cannabis, the judge noted, and the jury had actually cleared Musk on two claims.

Another legal front for a busy defendant

The ruling adds to a crowded docket for Musk, who recently settled a separate SEC case over his late disclosure of an initial Twitter stake for $1.5m. His “funding secured” Tesla saga first drew SEC fraud charges back in 2018.

He is also fighting Sam Altman in a high-stakes trial over OpenAI, all while steering the newly public SpaceX. The tweets that built his mythology keep generating legal bills.

Prejudgment interest, which Breyer also granted, could push the final figure higher still. For a man now worth more than a trillion dollars, the sum is survivable, but the finding that he defrauded investors is harder to shrug off.

from the here-to-build-an-encyclopedia dept

In Larry Sanger’s recent failed attempt to start a “WikiProject Intellectual Diversity”, he tried to recruit his followers to help him change Wikipedia’s rules around representation of viewpoints, religions, parties, and nationalities (a version of his earlier “Nine Theses”). The draft WikiProject was not itself a bannable offense, but his approach broke rules that were designed to foster fair discussions. Wikipedia’s rules really already support creation of balanced and robust articles about controversial topics – it just takes a huge amount of careful research, patience, and cooperation, and there’s no shortcut for that work.

In the first several months of Wikipedia, Sanger’s seriousness about its potential encouraged me to take up the challenge of helping write an encyclopedia that represents the sum of human knowledge. 25 years later, I remain an active editor dedicated to the Wikimedia movement for free and open knowledge, which is basically a fun and oddly serious hobby.

I edit a lot of moderately controversial articles that have glaring gaps in core principles of verifiability and neutral point of view. Many of Wikipedia’s most popular articles, like about politics and philosophy, are very informative and comprehensive, but second-tier articles don’t consistently get robust attention from editors. For example, I’ve recently repaired bias and disinformation in articles about AI regulation, LGBTQ rights in Nigeria, politicians in the Balkans, wealthy businessmen outside the US, influential religious organizations, and people accused of sexual harassment. I routinely fix articles that downplay negative information or present a controversial topic in a flattering way, in the style of Jeffrey Epstein’s ineffective project to get consultants to sanitize his article.

The good thing is that Wikipedia’s established rules already provide robust strategies to improve verifiability and balance in articles. Its principles expect editors to be cooperative and willing to cite a reliable source for nearly every sentence. You have to be up for changing your mind when somebody finds multiple reliable sources that disprove something you assumed, or at least up for slinking away to another article. To help counter bias and conflicts of interest, I apply elaborately layered guidance for evaluating and weighing sources – often citing academic journal articles and books, but not always, because the guidance recognizes that reliability is contextual. The “due weight” policy, part of the neutral point of view policy, pushes editors to search for more and better sources when something gets disputed, which results in a stronger article. I’ve learned that the best way to resolve a content dispute is to cite the best sources, reference the most relevant rules, present evidence calmly, and escalate one step at a time through the dispute resolution forums. Dispute resolution typically uses Wikipedia’s informal decision-making process, which reflects that Wikipedia is a decentralized asynchronous volunteer project, not an adjudicatory body. Wikipedia’s processes already work pretty well, they just take a lot of skill and patience, because collaboration is hard work.

Sanger was banned for off-Wikipedia canvassing and for not being on Wikipedia to build an encyclopedia, but to be clear, trying to start WikiProject Intellectual Diversity was not in itself a bannable offense. Canvassing is against the rules specifically to protect public and open processes that support the development of balanced articles. The canvassing guidelines discourage editors from trying to rig decision-making processes by selectively inviting participants who will take their side. The rules favor public discussions on Wikipedia so that all editors have an equal opportunity to participate. And since all Wikipedia edits are publicly tracked, editors can analyze each other’s contributions to detect biases and conflicts of interest. External invitations both selectively invite participation and prevent editors from exercising oversight. Volunteer administrators routinely block or even ban editors for inappropriate canvassing because this behavior compromises efforts to build a balanced encyclopedia.

Sanger’s recent advocacy reminds me of the pattern that researcher and Wikipedia editor Molly White described in January 2025: “right-wing voices attacking Wikipedia as part of an intensifying campaign against free and open access information.” In October, the Washington Post described Sanger as “fueling the right’s campaign” against Wikipedia. Among other incidents last year, House Republicans demanded disclosure of editor information over coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Sanger’s call to prohibit anonymity for the most dedicated volunteer administrators, one of his Nine Theses, is another one of his takes that would undermine intellectual freedom in the project, in line with the leaked Heritage Foundation plan to dox editors.

My work to counter gaps, bias, and spam in Wikipedia articles gives me proof every day that the project is imperfect. Every active editor has critiques of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the Wikimedia movement, and we debate issues and improvements at length. Wikipedia would benefit from additional contributors from any viewpoint or background who want to help build an encyclopedia. But improving Wikipedia requires intellectual honesty, cooperation, and willingness to apply established principles and rules even while critiquing them, not bad-faith publicity stunts.

Filed Under: canvassing, diversity, encyclopedia, larry sanger, wikipedia

Companies: wikimedia foundation, wikipedia

Whether you subscribe to the 2TB iCloud+ tier individually or pay for Apple One Premier, you’re getting the new Apple Intelligence in Apple Home features announced during WWDC 2026.

Apple didn’t break out exactly what customers might have to pay in order to access its most advanced AI features. While there aren’t any separate AI subscriptions or token purchase programs, users will need to spend more cash for the most access.

In the macOS Golden Gate beta release notes, Apple has confirmed that the Apple Home AI features will require the 2TB iCloud+ plan. On its own, that is a $10 a month plan, or is included with the $37.95 Apple One Premier subscription tier.

Either way, customers already paying for these products will gain more Apple Home features. The 2TB iCloud+ plan was already required to have unlimited cameras for HomeKit Secure Video.

While Apple isn’t being clear about which features are being lumped in here, it seems it is just referring to the HomeKit Secure Video AI analysis feature. It analyzes footage locally for people, objects, and events to piece together what happens in a recorded clip.

In the Apple Home app, those events can be stitched together into a series of clips, or shown as priority events. Either way, it is meant to serve as an easier way to review and search video recordings.

The notification grouping and 4K HomeKit Secure Video support don’t appear to be tied to the subscription, since they’re not relying on Apple’s AI image models. The lower 200GB and 50GB tiers are limited to 5 cameras and 2 cameras respectively.

Apple is making it clear: if you want full access to its AI and cloud features, you need to pay for its more premium services. It isn’t clear if Apple plans to offer separate AI subscriptions in the future.

Businesses looking to modernize their payment systems may want to learn what a crypto payment processor is, how it works, and why it matters.

Cryptocurrency and the crypto industry at large often appear most prominently in investing circles, but recent advancements in blockchain, the technology that supports crypto, have expanded crypto’s usefulness. Today, businesses across industries can make practical use of crypto thanks to the advent of crypto payment processors like 0xProcessing, tools that allow them to accept crypto payments without holding crypto themselves.

Crypto and related technologies remain something of a mystery for many companies, however, so to better determine whether adopting a crypto payment processor is the right move for them, businesses should learn more about what these tools are, how they work, and why they may prove useful.

What Is a Crypto Payment Processor?

Put simply, a crypto payment processor is a tool that allows businesses to accept various cryptocurrencies as payment. When a customer selects crypto at checkout, the processor generates a unique wallet address or QR code for that transaction. The customer sends their payment to that address for verification, and upon successful verification, the processor either converts the funds to the business’s preferred fiat currency or deposits them directly into the business’s crypto wallet.

Note that this approach means businesses do not have to accept crypto if they do not want to; if a company would prefer not to deal with the volatility of managing Bitcoin, for instance, they can simply convert it to USD at the counter, minimizing the risk of the payment losing value.

Transactions made using crypto can take anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes, depending on the cryptocurrency used, so businesses should prepare accordingly.

Why Businesses Might Use a Crypto Payment Processor

Aside from expanding payment options, there are several potential benefits to using a crypto payment processor. For businesses that operate online, accepting crypto may give them access to global customers, since most cryptocurrencies can be used from almost anywhere.

According to Deloitte, “Using crypto as a form of payment could reduce transaction fees and possibly eliminate the cost of float and the need to wait multiple days for cash settlement.”

This could be particularly true for cross-border payments, which have historically been more costly and take longer to process than domestic payments.

In more urban regions where competition between businesses tends to be fiercer, expanding the currencies they accept can make a given business appear more innovative, making it more appealing to tech-savvy consumers and other customers who may prefer to pay in alternative currencies.

Picking the Right Processor

Although crypto payment processors generally have benefits, businesses should be mindful of the specific processor they adopt, as they vary in overall quality and security.

On the whole, reliable crypto payment processors employ security features such as blockchain transparency, fraud prevention, wallet security, and compliance and KYC/AML measures. No security feature is foolproof, but these protocols may help businesses keep both their data and their customers’ data safe from fraud. This priority will likely become increasingly important as more purchases are made digitally.

Before adopting a crypto payment processor, businesses should thoroughly assess whether it would benefit them. If they serve an audience that is not interested in paying with crypto, chances are that tools to help them do so would have limited use.

Though cryptocurrency is by no means ubiquitous as a regular form of payment, its increasing popularity could prompt businesses that previously disregarded it to consider its implications for their future. For businesses that see crypto as a practical asset in the years to come, adopting a crypto payment processor could be a solid first step in preparing their operations for that future.

FAQ

Q: What is a crypto payment processor?
A: A crypto payment processor enables businesses to accept cryptocurrency payments while simplifying transaction management and settlement.

Q: Is it safe to accept cryptocurrencies as payment?
A: Generally yes, as reputable processors use blockchain verification, security controls, and compliance measures to help protect transactions.

Q: Can businesses receive fiat instead of cryptocurrency?
A: Indirectly, yes. Many crypto payment processors automatically convert crypto payments into traditional currencies.

Q: Which industries benefit most from crypto payments?
A: E-commerce, SaaS, gaming, travel, and digital service providers often see the greatest benefits from accepting cryptocurrency payment

Known for its cloud infrastructure that allows developers to deploy agents without managing servers, Vercel has quietly become one of the most central companies in AI software. The company currently sees 6 million deployments a day, half of them triggered by coding agents, and more than 1 trillion tokens flow through the company’s AI gateway daily.

After the company’s ShipNYC conference last week, we sat down with Vercel CEO Guillermo Rauch for his take on this moment in AI, and how platform companies like Vercel end up competing with major labs. Here’s a lightly edited transcript.

It feels like there’s a different energy in the community this year, fewer pilot programs and more focus on how to make things work well in practice. I’m sure you’ve seen that a lot with clients, but I’m curious what that journey has looked like within Vercel.

Last year was about prototyping. The sky’s the limit, unleash the agents, everyone can build, and so on. We did that, and we learned a lot because we had hundreds of agents organically developed and deployed within the company, and then you started getting into the realities of agents in production, and some of the challenges.

The biggest lesson for me was the home-run use cases, the two killer apps of agents. One is the coding agent, of course. That’s driving a lot of the token utilization in the world, but when you produce so much software, you need somewhere to put it. The second killer app of agents is the internal agent that helps you run the company. The challenge there is, how do you securely access data? How do you audit what the agent is doing? How do you get a trail of all of the tool calls and access controls that the agent had to incur in order to get a job done?

To solve that, we came up with this framework called Eve, where you can lay out an agents’ instructions and skills in natural language. And another tool is Vercel Sandbox, where you put the agent in a little cage. It can have the freedom still to express its intelligence, but then you can apply policy on what data it can access and what data can leave the sandbox.

What sort of problems does that help you avoid?

For [the] sandbox, the biggest advantage is data control. A real risk of AI that I always think about is, when you get a coding IDE like Devin or Cursor, if you’re in the wrong setting, they may train on your entire codebase. I remember talking to the president of Airbus about this. You have decades of wealth of very specific C++ code for aerospace engineering. Someone comes in and installs the wrong developer tool and boom, all the code goes out to the cloud for training.

I’m curious to hear more about that second killer use case. We all know about coding agents, but what does an internal corporate agent look like in practice?

So, there’s a sales rep sitting out there [in Vercel’s office]. She works on install base. Her job is to grow existing accounts. The bottleneck for people like her has not been her creativity, intelligence, ability to build relationships, it’s been data. “I don’t understand what accounts are growing faster. Give me the five accounts that have added the most seats in the last two weeks, so that I can prioritize my work.” She couldn’t ask that question in the past. She needed to wait until a Q1 project for a new sales dashboard completed. 

We were in that bottleneck for years at Vercel, and it was really frustrating because on the R&D side, we’re the fastest-moving company in the world. But on the sales engine, the Salesforce engineering [side], I was so incompetent. I had never opened Salesforce in my life when I started.

Now I feel like I can actually have impact across the entire company, because Eve can be used for our customer-facing agents and can be used to improve productivity. Same technology, it’s just APIs. Agents are forcing companies to open up, and that will have dramatic long-term implications. So many of these SaaS giants build their entire kingdoms on trapping your data, and that’s incompatible with agents.

How do you see client relationships with the big AI labs changing?

Last year there were a lot of people picking one lab partner — saying they would build everything on OpenAI or Anthropic. Now they’re saying, I understand how this all works — model, harness, data platform, sandbox, gateway — every piece is plug and play. You can use OpenAI, you can use Anthropic, or you can use Gemini. We’re seeing a lot of growth of Gemini, even though it’s not on the news as much, because people are optimizing for production now. The reality is, when you’re optimizing for production, you start looking at a price/performance, and Gemini models have awesome price/performance characteristics. You also bring in open models, so DeepSeek and GLM-5.2 are taking off. The data doesn’t lie.

There are places where you’re in direct competition with the labs too, right? Just the other week, OpenAI released a new set of tools that publish directly to the web without having to leave the OpenAI enclave.

It’s a natural next step for them to host little websites. And it’s a great opening for us, because now people will think of ChatGPT as a tool for making websites. And then if they keep asking the model questions about web hosting, the model recommends us. But you’re right, as the models or platforms add more capabilities, they come in direct competition with the infrastructure platforms that already exist.

I really think at this point we’re deciding on whether the model and the agent are going to be coupled.

Do you get all your intelligence from one place? Or do you get a module or a library or a building block from one provider, and then you build on top of it. That’s more like software engineering has always been, and that’s really what we’re bringing to market. We’re going to be the AWS of this generation, so obviously we’re fighting for a world of open protocols.

Engineers at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, working with colleagues at Waseda University in Japan, have added a working underwater capability to remote-controlled cockroaches. The insects already carry small electronic packs that let operators steer them through rubble and tight spaces. A new 3D-printed attachment now supplies oxygen so the same insects can keep moving when those spaces fill with water.

Madagascar hissing cockroaches serve as the platform, as previous iterations of this technology proved effective after real disasters because the insects can fit through gaps too narrow for most robots and climb over uneven debris without requiring extensive programming. Operators transmit wireless impulses to electrodes on the antennas or surrounding nerves. Gentle pulses move the insect left or right while it maintains its own balance and obstacle avoidance.

Sale

Bambu Lab A1 mini 3D Printer + LED Lamp Kit, Set Up in 20 Mins, High Speed & Precision, Full-Auto…

• A1 mini + LED Lamp Kit for Creative Light Projects: Bring your ideas to life with the included LED Lamp Kit. Simply print compatible lamp models and…
• The Perfect 3D Printer for Beginners: A1 mini 3D Printer is designed to make 3D printing easy from day one with automatic calibration, simple setup…
• Experience the Bambu Lab Ecosystem: Access MakerWorld’s huge library of ready-to-print models, manage prints through the Bambu Handy app, and enjoy…

Water always halted the earlier systems because cockroaches draw air in through tiny openings called spiracles on the sides of their bodies. Once submerged, the holes fill and the insect runs out of air in minutes. The new component overcomes this limitation by incorporating a tiny chemical oxygen generator into a 3D-printed backpack. The primary housing is approximately 10 by 10 millimeters and sits on the insect’s back. Inside, there is a sponge coated with manganese dioxide. When a small amount of liquid hydrogen peroxide enters the chamber, the catalyst degrades the liquid and produces oxygen gas. Four flexible silicone tubes deliver the gas directly to the cockroach’s thoracic spiracles. A flexible waterproof casing composed of printed resin closes the area and creates a pocket of breathable air around the ventilation openings.

The entire structure is light and flexible enough that the insect’s usual walk remains nearly intact. Early versions put additional mass on top, causing the cockroach to flip over underwater. Moving the generator and adjusting the shell shape resolved the stability issue. The equipped insects were tested in water-filled tubes and bespoke 3D-printed obstacle courses that simulated flooded pipes or collapsed building portions. Without the oxygen module, the roaches went inactive in minutes. It allowed them to remain responsive and mobile for up to three hours. On dry surfaces, they traveled at about 87 millimeters per second. As they went down the bottom and through submerged channels, their pace fell just slightly to around 78 millimeters per second.

The project builds on years of work by the same research groups. Previously, cyborg cockroaches helped with search efforts following a severe earthquake in Myanmar, reaching locations where human teams and conventional machines couldn’t. Adding reliable underwater operation allows for similar access to areas where flooding has obstructed typical pathways, such as storm sewers, half-submerged basements, or earthquake rubble drenched by burst pipes.
[Source]

​Vietnamese authorities have arrested and are prosecuting seven suspects believed to have run HiAnime, the largest anime piracy streaming service before its shutdown in June.

HiAnime provided access to a massive library of English-subbed and dubbed anime without subscription fees, attracting several hundred million visitors each month and temporarily surpassing legal streaming platforms like Disney+ and Crunchyroll in web traffic between late 2024 and 2025.

It was launched on the Zoro.to domain, rebranded to Aniwatch (and switched to Aniwatch.to) in July 2023, and again in March 2024 as HiAnime/H!Anime (using the HiAnime.to domain).

After becoming massively popular, HiAnime was also placed on the European Commission’s Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List and the United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) Notorious Markets list.

The seven defendants have been charged with infringing copyright and related rights and with money laundering, with four of them detained and the other three placed under house arrest.

They have been accused of creating more than 100 websites to upload over 26,000 pirated anime films, generating approximately $12.85 million in illegal advertising revenue between 2020 and April 2026.

​The Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE), a coalition of over 50 media and entertainment companies, including the world’s largest film studios and television networks, focused on shuttering illegal streaming services, confirmed the law enforcement action on Thursday and thanked U.S. authorities for their support throughout a multi-year investigation that led to the suspects’ arrests.

​”ACE applauds the actions of Vietnam’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS), in particular C03, the Economic Crimes Investigation Department, and A05, the Department of Cybersecurity and High-Tech Crime Prevention, in arresting and prosecuting seven operators believed to be behind Hianime and related piracy services,” said the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment on Thursday.

“ACE would also like to thank its partners, Homeland Security Investigations and the U.S. Department of Justice, for their continued support in this multi-year investigation and action. ACE looks forward to continuing to support the MPS and its relevant agencies, and to working even more closely with them on future actions against piracy services.”

Earlier this year, in March, ACE also announced the shutdown of AnimePlay, another major anime streaming platform that hosted more than 60 terabytes of anime TV shows and movies and had over 5 million registered users.

The anti-piracy coalition dismantled AnimePlay by taking all infrastructure offline, including its hosting servers and web domains.

Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.

The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.

Get the whitepaper