Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

Sennheiser MOMENTUM 5 Wireless Review: Did Sennheiser Just Undercut the HDB 630?

Published

on

The Sennheiser MOMENTUM 5 Wireless arrives at a critical moment for every premium noise-cancelling headphone brand that likes sleeping at night. Sony has the new 1000X The ColleXion, Apple has finally pushed forward with AirPods Max 2, Bose is still leaning hard into noise cancellation with its latest QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, and Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 continues to court listeners who demand that their wireless headphones sound like high-end transducers.

That matters because Sennheiser has spent the past few years defending two different corners of the headphone market: the mainstream wireless category with the MOMENTUM 4 Wireless, and the more serious audiophile lane with the HDB 630, which we also reviewed as a higher-performance Bluetooth headphone for listeners who prioritise sound quality over ANC performance or call quality.

MOMENTUM 5 Wireless Keeps the MOMENTUM 4 Formula But Adds More Control

sennheiser-momentum-5-wireless-headphones-black-front
MOMENTUM 5 (front)

The Sennheiser MOMENTUM 5 Wireless builds on the MOMENTUM 4 platform rather than replacing the basic formula. The new model keeps the 42mm transducer from its predecessor, manufactured at Sennheiser’s Tullamore, Ireland facility, and uses tuning inspired by the company’s HD 600-series headphones. Sennheiser describes the sound as full-bodied with dynamic bass, which suggests continuity with the MOMENTUM line rather than a major sonic reset. 

The more practical headline may be the user-replaceable 700 mAh battery, which gives the $399.99 MOMENTUM 5 Wireless a real longevity advantage over rivals that still treat batteries like a countdown timer to your next purchase. Sennheiser is giving owners a way to keep the headphones they already paid for instead of nudging them toward the next model the moment battery life starts to fade.

The codec and wireless story has also been updated. MOMENTUM 5 Wireless includes Hi-Res Audio certification, Snapdragon Sound, and Bluetooth codec support up to aptX Lossless. It ships with Bluetooth 5.4, but Sennheiser says the hardware is designed to support Bluetooth 6.0 through a future firmware update.

Advertisement

Noise cancellation has been revised with more microphones. Sennheiser says the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless uses four microphones per side for ANC and transparency functions, doubling the microphone count used for those duties. The company claims the new system is up to three times more effective at reducing distracting voice chatter, with improvements to airplane cabin noise reduction and voice quality on calls.

Spatial Audio Arrives, But the Replaceable Battery May Matter More

Spatial audio is included, but there are a few conditions. Dolby Atmos with head tracking will be enabled through a day-one firmware update in Sennheiser’s Smart Control Plus app, and it requires an Atmos-enabled source device plus supported Atmos content.

That should include popular devices such as recent iPhones, iPads, Macs, Apple TV 4K, many current Android phones, Fire TV devices, and other streamers or computers that support Dolby Atmos playback through services like Apple Music, Amazon Music Unlimited, TIDAL, Netflix, Disney+, or Max. The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless can handle the feature, but the phone, app, subscription tier, and content still have to line up. Naturally, audio remains a team sport whether we like it or not.

Support for Dolby Atmos-encoded content streamed through TIDAL worked properly out of the box, but head tracking was not yet enabled during my review period.

Advertisement

Battery life remains a major part of the story. Sennheiser rates the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless at up to 57 hours per charge with ANC engaged. The bigger practical change is the user-replaceable 700 mAh battery, which can be swapped with a small Phillips-head screwdriver.

That 60-hour battery claim looks great on paper, but real-world use landed a bit lower for me. Across several weeks of mixed listening, I averaged closer to 53 to 54 hours, depending on volume, source device, codec support, and whether I was streaming music from TIDAL and Qobuz or watching movies and TV on an iPad Pro.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Battery drain varied by device. My iPhone 14, iPhone 17, and iPhone X burned through the charge a bit faster, while a borrowed Samsung phone came closer to the upper end of Sennheiser’s rating. Streaming hi-res content from Qobuz and TIDAL pulled those numbers down slightly, which is exactly what you would expect when asking the headphones to do more than sip compressed audio through a straw.

Advertisement

With ANC engaged, especially in Adaptive or Custom modes, I would set realistic expectations closer to 51 to 52 hours. That is still excellent. I used the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless on NJ Transit, inside the walking migraine known as American Dream on Memorial Day Sunday with roughly 150,000 people trying to turn a mall into a survival documentary, and during a United Airlines trip home from Las Vegas that was delayed, rerouted through George Bush Airport in Houston, then Dulles in Northern Virginia, before finally reaching Newark about 17 hours later.

After seeing The Wizard of Oz at Sphere in Las Vegas, I thought Dorothy had the rough travel day. Turns out all she needed was a pair of ruby slippers and a unionized gate agent.

The practical takeaway is simple: the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless has more than enough stamina for a full week of commuting, travel, office use, and the kind of airport punishment that makes you question every life choice since booking basic economy. For anyone who treats wireless headphones like a daily workhorse rather than a delicate audio object, the battery life is one of the stronger reasons to consider them.

sennheiser-momentum-5-wireless-headphones-black-front-folded

Build Quality, Comfort, and a Travel Case That Actually Saves Space

The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless fold flat for travel, which helps, although they do not feel quite as premium in the hand as the Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 or Px8 S2. Those remain part of my daily rotation along with the HDB 630, and Bowers still has the edge when it comes to materials and that more polished luxury feel. The Sennheiser build is still quite solid, just more practical than posh.

Advertisement

The headband uses braided cloth on the top side with padding underneath, and on my head, the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless feel very similar to the HDB 630. The difference is that the HDB 630 uses the same leatherette material on both the inside and outside of the headband, which gives it a slightly different tactile feel. Both are lightweight and easy to wear, and neither feels like it was designed by someone who thinks discomfort builds character.

The ear pads have the same basic issue I noticed with the HDB 630. They are soft and comfortable, but I would prefer them to be slightly firmer. They also get warm after about 30 minutes, especially during commuting or longer listening sessions. Not unbearable, not deal-breaking, but noticeable.

Clamping force is generally similar to the HDB 630 and less firm than the Bowers & Wilkins models. That matters because I have a huge head, move through trains with some force, and still somehow try to maintain the stealth profile of a ninja who has had enough of NJ Transit. The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless stayed secure without feeling tight, which is the balance you want from travel headphones that are going to see actual use rather than live in a review drawer.

Sennheiser has also reduced the overall travel footprint. The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless carrying case is 20% smaller, and the packaging is now smaller and plastic-free. Inside the case, Sennheiser includes a USB Type-C charging cable and a 3.5mm analog audio cable, so wired listening is still available for laptops, in-flight entertainment systems, and the other legacy sources that refuse to die quietly.

Advertisement
sennheiser-momentum-5-case-comparison
Case Comparison: Sennheiser HDB 630 (left) vs. MOMENTUM 5 (right)

Compared to the case supplied with the more expensive HDB 630, the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless case is noticeably smaller, which matters when the headphones are going into a backpack, carry-on, or that personal item you are already pretending is not overstuffed. Both models fold, so neither is a travel disaster, but the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless is clearly the more compact option.

The accessory package is where the pricing difference starts to make more sense. The HDB 630 includes extras such as the airplane adapter and Sennheiser’s BTD 700 USB Adapter; the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless does not. That makes the HDB 630 the better-equipped package for listeners who want more connection options in the box, while the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless keeps things simpler, smaller, and more mainstream.

sennheiser-momentum-5-wireless-headphones-black-inside-case
MOMENTUM 5

Smarter App, Stronger ANC

The companion app also gets more control. The new Smart Control Plus app includes an 8-band EQ, user presets, and Sennheiser’s Sound Personalization system. That should give listeners more flexibility than a few canned tuning modes, especially for those who liked the MOMENTUM 4 but wanted more precise adjustment.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement

One of the stronger parts of the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless experience is Sennheiser’s Smart Control Plus app. This was already one of the highlights with the HDB 630, and that carries over here. The app is comprehensive without feeling like homework, and it worked flawlessly with both Sennheiser models during my testing.

The level of control is the real win. You are not stuck with a crude choice between full ANC and transparency mode. The MOMENTUM 5 lets you adjust the level of noise cancellation, enable or disable Anti-Wind in ANC mode, manage multipoint connectivity, and turn the app’s individual tiles on or off depending on what you actually use. That last part sounds minor until you have used enough headphone apps that feel like they were organized by committee after a three-hour liquid lunch.

ANC performance is also very strong. The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless did an effective job reducing commuter noise, chatter, and the general low-level misery that comes with trains, airports, and crowded public spaces. More importantly, it does not wreck the sound. There is still a slight reduction in openness and detail with ANC engaged, and the presentation tightens up a little, but the damage is minimal.

I still prefer listening with ANC off when the environment allows it, because the MOMENTUM 5 sounds more open and natural that way. But Sennheiser has made the ANC useful without turning the music into a padded cell.

Advertisement
sennheiser-momentum-5-wireless-headphones-black-side
MOMENTUM 5 (side)

Buttons, Touch Sensors, and Real-World Use

The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless and HDB 630 are very similar when it comes to controls, and that is mostly a good thing. Sennheiser keeps the basics straightforward with a power button that also handles pairing, plus the expected USB-C connection and 3.5mm analog input for wired listening. Nothing exotic there, and nobody needs a treasure map to find the ports.

The touch controls are where things get more personal. Sennheiser’s system works, and I will give them full credit for that. Playback, volume, track skipping, calls, ANC, and transparency mode can all be handled from the ear cup, and the gestures responded reliably during my testing. Transparency mode can be activated with a double tap, which is useful when someone suddenly decides your headphones are an invitation to start talking.

That said, I am still more of an app person. The controls are not bad, but after rotating through multiple headphones and wireless earbuds, each with its own secret handshake of taps, swipes, pinches, holds, and “wait, was that two fingers or three?” routines, it becomes a lot to remember. At some point, you are not controlling headphones; you are auditioning for community theater mime work.

Sennheiser’s Smart Control Plus app makes more sense for how I actually use headphones. It is clean, comprehensive, and easier than trying to remember every gesture sequence while standing on a train platform or walking through a crowded terminal. The touch controls are there, they work, and plenty of users will like them. I just prefer opening the app and making the adjustment without playing finger Twister on the side of my head.

As for phone calls, the MOMENTUM 5 can handle them, but I remain fundamentally opposed to taking calls through earbuds or headphones unless absolutely necessary. That is not a Sennheiser problem. That is a “please stop making me listen to people conduct business next to the avocados” problem.

Advertisement

BTD 700 Dongle: Great Idea, Rough Landing With MOMENTUM 5

The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless has a stronger codec story than the HDB 630 in one key respect: it supports aptX Lossless in addition to the usual Bluetooth basics, but there is still no LDAC support. For Android users with the right hardware, that may not be a big issue. For Apple users, it gets more complicated because the iPhone and MacBook still do not support aptX natively. Naturally.

Sennheiser BTD 700 USB dongle in laptop
Sennheiser BTD 700 USB-C dongle

That is where Sennheiser’s BTD 700 USB-C dongle is supposed to help. It acts as an external Bluetooth transmitter, bypassing the device’s built-in Bluetooth stack and handling higher-quality codec support itself. In theory, that makes it a very useful add-on for getting better wireless performance from laptops, tablets, and phones that otherwise leave you stuck with more limited Bluetooth options.

The problem is that my experience with the BTD 700 and the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless was not clean. Using it with both my iPhone and MacBook, I heard audible distortion, which is not exactly the kind of “high-resolution” experience anyone is looking for. Sennheiser has confirmed that it is working on a fix, so this may be resolved through a firmware update, but as of my testing, the issue was real.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless still supports aptX Lossless, which is a meaningful feature on paper and potentially in practice. But the BTD 700 experience needs that fix before I would call it a slam dunk. Great concept. Right now, a little too much gremlin in the machine.

Advertisement

Listening

sennheiser-momentum-5-wireless-headphones-earcups
MOMENTUM 5 earcups

The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless and HDB 630 are cut from the same Sennheiser cloth, and anyone expecting two completely different headphones is going to be disappointed. Or relieved. They share a lot of the same DNA: excellent clarity, a largely linear tonal balance, strong midrange presence, and a presentation that favors detail and space over cheap bass tricks. Sennheiser did not turn the MOMENTUM 5 into a skull-rattling gym headphone, and thank you for small mercies.

But there are differences, and they matter.

Where the HDB 630 leans a little more restrained and studio-minded, the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless brings slightly more weight and impact in the bass range. It still will not rearrange your dental work, but there is more definition, punch, and low-end authority than I heard from the HDB 630. Green Day’s “Jesus of Suburbia” and “21 Guns” still had the clarity, imaging, and sense of space that made the HDB 630 so easy to like, but the MOMENTUM 5 added a little more drive underneath the guitars and drums. Not bloated. Not boosted into stupidity. Just more physical.

That difference became more obvious with Daft Punk’s “Get Lucky” and “Giorgio by Moroder.” The HDB 630 presents those tracks with a more open, almost studio-monitor sense of space, which is rare for a closed-back wireless headphone. The MOMENTUM 5 does not lose that Sennheiser clarity, but it adds more rhythmic grip and bass definition. The groove lands with more conviction, which matters when the entire point of the track is to make you forget whatever nonsense you were supposed to be doing for the next six minutes.

Sennheiser HDB 630 Wireless Headphones with Travel Case
Sennheiser HDB 630 Wireless Headphones with Travel Case

Sia’s “Unstoppable,” “Cheap Thrills,” and “Breathe Me” pushed the MOMENTUM 5 in a different direction. Those tracks are a cheerful little reminder that love, betrayal, and emotional wreckage can apparently come with solid production values. Her voice was cleanly centered and easy to follow, with enough texture to keep the emotional weight intact. “Breathe Me” in particular exposed the MOMENTUM 5’s ability to keep vocals intimate without turning the presentation syrupy. The HDB 630 is a touch more controlled and refined through the upper ranges, but the MOMENTUM 5 gives the material a bit more body.

Advertisement

Massive Attack’s “Teardrop” also favored the MOMENTUM 5’s extra bass definition. The pulsing low end had more shape and authority than it does through the HDB 630, while the vocal remained suspended in the mix with that slightly ghostly quality the track needs. Again, this is not bass-head territory. Sennheiser is not auditioning for a parking lot SPL contest. But the MOMENTUM 5 has more impact where the HDB 630 can sometimes feel a little polite.

Disturbed’s cover of “The Sound of Silence” was the track that really exposed the difference. David Draiman’s voice needs weight, control, and scale, and the MOMENTUM 5 gave it more physical presence than the HDB 630. The power in his delivery hit harder, especially as the arrangement builds. Draiman is also a total mensch and a personal hero, so I am not exactly coming into that track emotionally neutral. Still, the MOMENTUM 5 handled the vocal intensity well without smearing the edges or turning the whole thing into melodrama with Bluetooth attached.

The one tradeoff is the top end. On some of the same tracks I used with the HDB 630, the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless sounded slightly harder through the treble. Not bright enough to become a deal-breaker, and not sharp enough to make me start bargaining with my own ears, but it is there. The HDB 630 has a little more refinement and composure up top, while the MOMENTUM 5 trades some of that smoothness for greater bass impact and a more energetic overall presentation.

That is really the comparison in one sentence: the HDB 630 is the more restrained, refined, audiophile-leaning wireless headphone, while the MOMENTUM 5 Wireless gets very close in clarity and tonal balance but adds more bass definition, more punch, and a little more everyday fun. Sennheiser may have created a problem for itself here, because the less expensive headphone does not sound like the lesser one in every category.

Advertisement
sennheiser-momentum-5-wireless-headphones-black-angle
MOMENTUM 5

The Bottom Line

The Sennheiser MOMENTUM 5 Wireless is not a dramatic reinvention, but it does not need to be. The upgrades that matter are practical and audible: Dolby Atmos with head tracking, stronger ANC with four microphones per sideaptX LosslessHi-Res Audio certification, an 8-band EQ, and a user-replaceable 700 mAh battery. That battery is the sleeper feature because it gives the $399.99 MOMENTUM 5 a real longevity advantage in a category where too many brands still treat worn-out batteries as your problem. 

What is missing? There is still no LDAC, the BTD 700 dongle issue needs a fix, and the MOMENTUM 5 does not include the same accessory package as the more expensive HDB 630. It also does not feel quite as premium as the Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 or Px8 S2, even if the build is solid, comfortable, and travel-friendly.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Should you buy it over the HDB 630 and save some money? For many listeners, yes. The HDB 630 still has the more refined, audiophile-leaning presentation, but the MOMENTUM 5 gets surprisingly close while offering stronger bass impact, excellent ANC, a better travel footprint, and a lower price. That makes it one of the more compelling wireless headphones in the $350 to $450 range, and anyone shopping there should put it on the audition list before Sony, Bose, Apple, or Bowers get the automatic nod.

Pros:

  • Strong clarity, detail retrieval, and linear tonal balance
  • More bass impact and definition than the HDB 630, without turning into a bass-heavy mess
  • Excellent ANC performance that does not seriously damage sound quality
  • Smart Control Plus app is comprehensive, reliable, and genuinely useful
  • Adjustable ANC, Anti-Wind mode, multipoint connectivity, and customizable app tiles
  • Dolby Atmos support worked properly with TIDAL during testing
  • aptX Lossless support gives it a stronger codec story than many rivals
  • User-replaceable 700 mAh battery is a major long-term ownership win
  • Real-world battery life remains excellent, even if below the claimed maximum
  • Lightweight, comfortable fit with solid build quality
  • Folds flat and comes with a noticeably smaller travel case than the HDB 630
  • Strong value at $399.99 compared with the more expensive HDB 630

Cons:

  • No LDAC support
  • BTD 700 USB-C dongle produced distortion with iPhone and MacBook during testing
  • Head tracking was not enabled during the review period
  • Treble can sound slightly harder than the HDB 630 on some tracks
  • Does not feel as premium as the Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 or Px8 S2
  • Ear pads could be slightly firmer
  • Pads get warm after about 30 minutes
  • Does not include the airplane adapter or BTD 700 USB Adapter like the HDB 630
  • Touch controls work, but remembering every tap, swipe, pinch, and gesture remains a pain

Our Ratings

★★★★★★★★★★ Sound Quality

★★★★★★★★★★ Comfort

Advertisement

★★★★★★★★★★ Usability

★★★★★★★★★★ Build Quality

★★★★★★★★★★ ANC

★★★★★★★★★★ Value

Advertisement

Price & Availability

The MOMENTUM 5 Wireless will be available in Black, White, and Denim finishes for $399.99 USD, with U.S. availability beginning June 16, 2026 through Sennheiser’s website and select retailers.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Canonical’s Upcoming AI Tool: Talk to Ubuntu Instead of Typing

Published

on

This week the Ubuntu desktop’s director of engineering announced they’re bringing speech-to-text dictation to Ubuntu Desktop, aiming for an experience “that feels like a natural part of the desktop while respecting user privacy and running entirely on local hardware.”

“Speech recognition has become a common feature on modern platforms, and we think it should be a first-class experience on Ubuntu Desktop as well.”

More details from the blog It’s FOSS:


For Ubuntu 26.10, the initial version of Myna is expected to be a desktop dictation tool built around GNOME on Wayland with a push-to-talk mechanism gatekeeping when your microphone accepts input. Using it means holding a hotkey, speaking, and letting go. A small activity indicator shows while it is listening, and the transcribed text lands wherever the cursor was sitting when dictation started.

Advertisement

Recognition itself happens inside a sandboxed component called the Canonical Inference Snap, while a Speech Orchestrator manages the session and an Audio Adapter handles whatever the microphone picks up, denoising and chunking it before it ever reaches the model… Speech recognition will happen locally, and an internet connection is not needed once the appropriate model is installed… The audio data won’t be sticking around either, being stored in a small in-memory buffer that gets discarded the moment the session ends. Features like dictation into password fields, wake words, continuous listening, voice assistants, voice commands, translation, speaker identification, and automatic language detection are all off the table…

You should also know that Canonical is looking for feedback before the specs for Myna are finalized, especially from people who already rely on dictation or assistive tools on Linux.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Are You Eligible for Part of Apple’s $250M AI iPhone Settlement? How to Find Out

Published

on

If you bought an iPhone 16 or iPhone 15 when they launched, you may be able to claim some of the money from a class action lawsuit against Apple. It’s all tied to the new Apple Intelligence features the company previewed during launch — features that ultimately didn’t arrive on time, but were finally unveiled more extensively this month at WWDC 2026.

Apple settled a shareholder lawsuit in May, agreeing to pay $250 million to customers who bought the iPhone 16 and some iPhone 15 models during a specified period. The lawsuit alleged that Apple misled customers by promising AI features that didn’t ship when the new devices did. Payouts between $25 and $95 per eligible device are expected.

In a statement to CNET Managing Editor David Lumb, an Apple spokesperson said, “Apple has reached a settlement to resolve claims related to the availability of two additional features. We resolved this matter to stay focused on doing what we do best, delivering the most innovative products and services to our users.”

Advertisement

Why is there a lawsuit over Apple Intelligence?

When Apple advertised its new iPhone 16 lineup, it emphasized how they were optimized for AI features such as an enhanced Siri that could act as an intelligent agent. When the phones did arrive, Apple Intelligence wasn’t yet ready; its first features didn’t arrive until iOS 18.1, five weeks later.

According to the proposed settlement, “Apple allegedly saturated the market with deceptive ads, inducing consumers to purchase iPhones based on the promise of certain enhanced Siri features.”

Some features of Apple Intelligence did ship soon after the introduction of the iPhone 16 and iOS 18, including Visual Intelligence, Live Translation, Writing Tools, Genmoji and Clean Up. But those weren’t the advanced features Apple highlighted.

Who is eligible for the $250 million settlement?

Customers who purchased one of the following devices between June 10, 2024, and March 29, 2025, are eligible to receive a settlement payment:

Advertisement
  • iPhone 16
  • iPhone 16E
  • iPhone 16 Plus
  • iPhone 16 Pro
  • iPhone 16 Pro Max
  • iPhone 15 Pro
  • iPhone 15 Pro Max

The iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max are included because they had the processor and memory to run Apple Intelligence features.

It’s estimated that there are approximately 36 million customers eligible for this settlement.

Watch this: What iPhone Users Actually Want From the New Google-Powered Siri

How to claim your portion of the settlement

For now, you need to wait.

As set forth in the settlement, Apple will provide a list of eligible customers and their contact information to a settlement administrator. 

Advertisement

After the data has been verified, the company Verita will send email and postal notices to those customers directing them to a settlement website. That site has not yet been created. The deadline for filing your claim will be 90 days after your notice arrives.

When can you expect to receive a settlement payment?

According to the settlement, Apple must provide the information about affected customers within five days of the settlement approval, which was scheduled for June 17, 2026.

When the data is provided and verified, a 45-day notice period begins to inform potential consumers that they’re eligible for a payment.

The actual payment of claims will occur within a 60-calendar-day window after the final details, such as exclusions and objections,  have been worked out. That puts the first checks or deposits arriving sometime after September 2026, depending on court dates and possible extensions.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

US Bill Would Mandate AI Chip Location Tracking to Thwart China and Other Adversaries

Published

on

NBC News reports:


A group of companies that specialize in tracking international shipments of sensitive technologies is backing a Capitol Hill bill that would require America’s most powerful AI chips to incorporate stronger security mechanisms aimed at preventing the chips from reaching China and other adversaries. The letter, signed by six companies, says the Chip Security Act (CSA) would increase American chip companies’ competitiveness and close key loopholes in the U.S. export control regime.

The move clashes with claims from semiconductor lobbying groups that the requirements would constrain America’s booming chip industry. Sent to congressional leadership Thursday morning and seen by NBC News, the dispatch instead argues that more robust security verification would assure chip customers and manufacturers that they are abiding by sensitive restrictions on chip sales. The companies argue that the boosted confidence will “lead to increased sales, faster export approvals, larger transactions, greater access to new markets, and more expansive chip deals.”

Despite U.S. export control laws banning sales of advanced AI chips to certain countries, including China, loopholes in current requirements have allowed billions of dollars’ worth of America’s best AI chips to be sold to entities in third-party countries that can then forward them to China. In just one case in March, the Justice Department charged three people with conspiring to forward $2.5 billion of AI chips to China. The CSA aims to address those loopholes, mandating that chip exporters better track where advanced chips are sent, via either bespoke location-verification hardware or software that can run on existing hardware. That, bill proponents claim, would ensure that sensitive chips could be sold to countries like Malaysia or Indonesia without fear of further transfer to China… Experts say that because chips perform the advanced computations required for frontier AI systems, cutting off access to the chips is crucial to prevent geopolitical rivals from using AI systems for military or economic purposes.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

HDMI 2.2 doubles bandwidth to 96Gbps, enabling uncompressed 4K at 240Hz

Published

on

Forward-looking: The next version of HDMI is mainly about pushing bandwidth higher to carry better video and audio, not small, incremental tweaks. HDMI 2.2, teased at CES 2025 and formally released by the HDMI Forum in June of that year, raises maximum bandwidth to 96Gbps, twice that of HDMI 2.1, allowing more uncompressed video data to move between devices.

HDMI 2.2 can carry uncompressed 4K video at up to 240Hz, something that currently requires Display Stream Compression (which as we’ve shown however, is not a big limitation). It can also reach 4K at 480Hz using 4:2:0 chroma subsampling, and handle uncompressed RGB 8K at 60Hz.

The added bandwidth cuts down on the compression and other tricks current hardware has had to rely on to push high frame rates. For gamers, that extra headroom makes it easier to drive high refresh rates at 4K and beyond without leaning as heavily on compression or workarounds.

With compression still in the toolkit when needed, the spec allows for more extreme modes, too, including 1440p at refresh rates above 1,000Hz – numbers that, for now, sit well beyond everyday use.

Advertisement

That leap is tied to FRL2, the updated signaling technology underpinning HDMI 2.2. The transition is already underway at the hardware level. “We’re hearing chip manufacturers will start to sample their FRL2 chips this year,” Rob Tobias, CEO and president of the HDMI Licensing Administrator, told ARMdevices at Computex 2026. “And so we should start to see some 96 or up to 96 gigabit HDMI 2.2 products next year.” Certification efforts are ongoing, and the first wave of compatible devices is expected in 2027.

Still, the headline number – 96Gbps – doesn’t tell the whole story. HDMI 2.2 rolls out in multiple tiers, including 64Gbps and 80Gbps versions, and certification doesn’t require manufacturers to hit the top speed. That means two devices both labeled “HDMI 2.2” could perform very differently depending on how they’re built. For buyers, that puts more weight on spec sheets than branding.

In the PC space, the timing is complicated by the fact that DisplayPort 2.1 already delivers up to 80Gbps and is widely used in high-end monitors. For enthusiasts running multi-display setups, HDMI hasn’t been the primary interface for some time, and that’s unlikely to change overnight. Licensing costs may also factor into how quickly HDMI 2.2 gains traction compared with DisplayPort.

Where HDMI continues to hold ground is in the living room. Features like ARC, CEC, and ALLM are already deeply integrated into TVs and home theater systems, and HDMI 2.2 adds another layer with Latency Indication Protocol, or LIP, aimed at tightening audio-video synchronization – a persistent issue with soundbars and AV receivers. It’s a small but practical upgrade, and one that targets a problem many users encounter even in otherwise high-end setups.

Advertisement

Even so, there’s a gap between what the specification allows and what current content actually demands. Most games and video still operate well below the limits of HDMI 2.1, and 4K at 120Hz – already supported – remains underutilized. It’s easy enough to imagine future consoles taking advantage of higher refresh rates, but widespread use will depend on both hardware and software catching up.

That lag is likely to show up in the rollout. GPU support isn’t expected until late 2027 or later, and early adoption will likely be confined to premium hardware. On the TV side, HDMI capabilities often depend on the underlying processing chips, which have historically led to uneven feature support even among top-tier models. There’s little reason to expect a cleaner transition this time around.

For now, HDMI 2.2 is more about preparing for future hardware than something people need to upgrade to right away. The spec sets a high ceiling, but it may take several product generations before most users see a tangible benefit. In the meantime, its presence will likely be felt more in product positioning than in everyday performance.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Leatherman Uses A Steel For Some Of Its Multitools You Might Have Never Heard Of

Published

on





Portland, Oregon-based Leatherman is known for its multitools, which feature a plier-based design built around an iconic butterfly mechanism — unlike the iconic Swiss Army Knife. One would imagine the pricing hierarchy for its lineup would be defined by the number of tools, the materials, and the build quality; while that’s generally the case, it’s not for the pliers. Instead, the blade is how you gauge whether your Leatherman multitool is cheap or expensive.

Except for the military and law-enforcement-specific MUT models that retail at $230, all inexpensive (relatively speaking, of course) Leatherman multitools bearing unmarked knife blades are made from 420HC steel. The $100 Skeletool CX and RX variants charge a $10 premium over the base Skeletool to incorporate premium 154CM steel. However, the flagship Leatherman Arc ($250) and Wave Alpha ($200) are equipped with a knife fashioned from an exotic made-in-USA steel branded as CPM MagnaCut. This steel is usually found in high-end pocket knives priced around $300, and it isn’t uncommon for some MagnaCut knives to hit the $500 mark.

Advertisement

Knife steels are designed to strike an optimal balance between three mutually exclusive traits: toughness, edge retention, and corrosion resistance. MagnaCut is a super steel engineered to significantly outperform both 420HC and 154CM in all three aforementioned parameters. The super steel’s improved toughness allows the knife to be ground thinner, with a blade geometry that cuts effortlessly. Meanwhile, its elevated hardness means it stays sharper for longer and resists corrosion better.

Advertisement

What makes CPM MagnaCut steel so special?

CPM stands for Crucible Particle Metallurgy, a fancy trademark for Crucible Industries’ proprietary technique for manufacturing sintered steel. This process atomizes individual alloying elements into tiny, uniformly shaped balls. These powdered elements are then combined in precise ratios under extreme heat and uniform pressure to form an unnaturally dense metal with a perfect grain microstructure and perfect distribution of alloying elements.

This matters because the complex metallurgy underpinning knife steels essentially boils down to finding the sweet spot between hardness, toughness, and corrosion resistance. For example, increasing the carbon content of steel improves hardness and edge retention, but it also reduces toughness. Adding elements such as chromium, vanadium, and niobium to form carbides improves corrosion and wear resistance but makes the blade edge prone to chipping. Steels manufactured using the CPM process allow metallurgists to fine-tune these blends to nail the performance sweet spot.

That’s basically how MagnaCut manages to hit the Goldilocks zone of chromium content, improving corrosion resistance while inhibiting the formation of chromium carbides. Instead, it has harder and smaller vanadium and niobium carbides throughout, which improve wear resistance and significantly reduce chipping compared to other so-called super steels like CPM Rex 121 – even if it retains edges better than MagnaCut. CPM MagnaCut might not be the absolute best at any single metric, but it is an excellent all-rounder, and that’s precisely why Leatherman uses it on its priciest multitools.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

NASA’s Perseverance Rover Has Traveled The Distance Of A Marathon On Mars

Published

on

It did so in just five years.

Perseverance is officially a marathon finisher. NASA shared this week that the Mars rover has surpassed a total distance of 26.2 miles since it landed on the red planet five years ago. Considering its speed tops out at .1 mph under the best conditions, that’s a pretty remarkable achievement. It crossed the marathon mark on June 14, according to NASA. “Perseverance is only the second explorer to travel the distance of a marathon on another world, following NASA’s Opportunity rover, which accomplished the feat in 2015,” the space agency wrote in an Instagram post. 

By comparison, it took Opportunity 11 years and two months to cover that much ground. The Curiosity rover, which has been on Mars since 2012, has driven just over 23 miles. Perseverance “crossed the milestone while exploring intriguing, ancient terrain to the west of Jezero Crater, where the robotic geologist discovered the remnants of an ancient lake, and possible signs of ancient life,” NASA said. The rover recently sent back images from its western excursion, which included a selfie.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Hacking The Mi Band 10 Smart Band And Its Bestechnic SoC

Published

on

In between playing Doom on the most ergonomically challenged devices, [Aaron Christophel] likes to take a relaxing break with reverse-engineering Xiaomi Mi Band fitness trackers and writing custom firmware for them. Also so that he can play more Doom on those, natch. The latest subject comes in the form of the Mi Band 10, which features a BES2700iMP SoC, known internally at the manufacturer Bestechnic as the BEST1503. This is all documented on the GitHub project.

In the accompanying video we get some more details on this project, with the main challenge being that for this Mi Band 10 there’s no public SDK for its SoC. This was a major bummer until [Aaron] realized that the BEST1306 (BES2700IHC) is effectively the same SoC, but with a leaked SDK available via apparently audio-focused development kits. From there a BEST1503-compatible SDK could be assembled.

Naturally, to check that all of this was working correctly Doom was ported to the device courtesy of the GBADoom project. This mostly works aside from the display running in single-bit SPI mode instead of quad-SPI that it should be capable of, along with limited color depth. Despite burning all the tokens on the Claude, this provided little help, probably because the required information hasn’t leaked out of Bestechnic yet and ended up in the training data set.

Advertisement

Since the Mi Band 9 uses the same SoC, it’s expected that this reverse-engineered SDK will also work for that fitness band, though that hasn’t been tested yet.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

TechCrunch Mobility: A new robotaxi scorecard shows China’s dominance

Published

on

Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility — your central hub for news and insights on the future of transportation. To get this in your inbox, sign up here for free — just click TechCrunch Mobility!

Today is Juneteenth, a U.S. federal holiday marking the end of slavery in the United States. 

About 10 years ago, there was a lot of chatter about who was winning the self-driving car race. One of the problems with that debate — besides assuming there would be just one winner — was that no one had a reliable way to measure it. This was an early era filled with a lot of demos and capital, but little substance — at least what the public, and folks like myself, had access to. 

Advisory and research startup Autnmy AI has developed a generative AI platform to create a benchmarking system that evaluates and ranks autonomous vehicle companies in an effort to answer that question in real time. And this week, the startup released its Road to Autonomy Index, which searches relevant global public databases, including federal and state reports, SEC documents, public exchanges, and other data. The system weighs the company’s operations, scale, revenue, commercial partnerships, manufacturing, and safety record based on that data and provides an update every 12 hours. There are four indices that rank robotaxis, autonomous driving licensing companies, autonomous trucks, and delivery bots.

Advertisement

One important note, per Autnmy AI co-founder Rob Grant, the AI platform doesn’t just scrape information off the internet. “We agreed early on, we don’t scrape information,” he said. “If it’s publicly available or if it’s available under a Creative Commons license, we will use that information. We do have some license data that we pay folks for, and under that agreement too.”

The indices take a global approach, which produces some interesting results. One of the initial takeaways that made an impression on Grant was China’s stronger ranking across multiple categories.

As of Friday, the robotaxi leader was not Waymo. It was China’s Baidu Apollo Go program — just barely. Waymo was in the secondary position, followed by Chinese companies Pony.ai and WeRide. Tesla was in the fifth position. 

A little bird

blinky cat bird green
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin

I was reminded recently by a little bird to keep an eye on the Texas automated vehicle tracker tool that launched in May. And I am glad they did; looks like Tesla, Waymo, and Zoox are building up their respective fleets in the state. Reminder: This doesn’t mean every one of these are being used commercially. Zoox, for instance, cannot operate commercially until it receives an exemption from the federal government. It currently has the ability to give rides in its custom-built robotaxi but cannot charge customers.

As of May 28, Waymo had 577 autonomous vehicles registered in the state. It now has 620 of them, about a 7.5% increase in less than a month. Tesla now has 69 registered autonomous vehicles, a 64% increase from the 42 it had on May 28. Zoox, which had 35 registered autonomous vehicles last month, now has 43.

Advertisement

Avride, Nuro, and Volkswagen subsidiary MOIA are holding steady at 317, 47, and 12, respectively. 

Got a tip for us? Email Kirsten Korosec at kirsten.korosec@techcrunch.com or my Signal at kkorosec.07, or email Sean O’Kane at sean.okane@techcrunch.com.

Deals!

money the station
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin

Cargofy, a logistics company that uses AI to automate freight operations, raised $11 million in a Series A funding round led by u.ventures, Toloka, and Movens Capital. Des Traynor, co-founder of Intercom, and several angel investors, also participated. 

Carro, the Singapore-based online car marketplace, acquired Australian used-car platform CarPlace, Reuters reported. Terms were not disclosed.

Gatik, a startup that has developed self-driving trucks for short hauls, announced a multi-year partnership with PepsiCo. The companies wouldn’t share the value of this deal, but it does signal PepsiCo’s commitment to Gatik, which is already operating driverless trucks for the food and beverage giant across Arkansas, Arizona, and Texas. 

Advertisement

QuantumScape announced a joint research agreement with Honda R&D Co. to accelerate solid-state battery development and associated manufacturing processes.

Automaker Stellantis, self-driving startup Wayve, and ride-hailing giant Uber struck a deal to jointly develop and deploy driverless robotaxis.

XDOF, a startup focused on robot training data, raised $70 million from Thrive Capital, Spark Capital, a16z, Lux, and WndrCo.

Notable reads and other tidbits

Image Credits:Bryce Durbin

A video posted on Reddit showed a driver running a stop sign and hitting an autonomous vehicle in Dallas. TechCrunch confirmed it was an Avride robotaxi, which was hailed via the Uber app. An Avride spokesperson said no injuries were reported and that data from the incident is being reviewed “to continuously refine our technology and processes, as part of our standard procedures.” When asked about the reaction of the self-driving system and the human safety operator who was behind the wheel, Avride said, “Our safety review is currently ongoing, so we cannot provide more precise details at this time.”

Tesla owners in China have discovered a workaround to the vehicle’s distracted driving monitor: tiny plastic heads.  

Advertisement

Over on X, folks spotted a Tesla with an authorized limousine permit sticker for San Francisco County and the San Francisco International Airport. A spokesperson for SFO told TechCrunch that “Tesla has been issued a limousine permit to operate at SFO. This is for traditional limousine operations, meaning the vehicles have a human driver. Tesla has not been issued a permit for any autonomous operations at SFO.”

Mobileye, which has pitched itself as an autonomous vehicle technology supplier, is now making moves to become a robotaxi operator. The company plans to launch a robotaxi service in an unnamed U.S. city in 2027. History lesson: Mobileye founder and CEO Amnon Shashua told me back in 2020 that to crack the holy grail of passenger car autonomy, you needed to pursue robotaxis first.  

Uber plans to launch a premium robotaxi service in Houston by mid-2027, making it the second U.S. market under its partnership with EV maker Lucid and autonomous vehicle startup Nuro.

Waymo recalled its fleet of nearly 4,000 robotaxis to stop them from driving into highway construction zones. Waymo took its robotaxis off the freeways weeks ago and has identified at least 13 instances of its robotaxis driving into highway sections that were closed for construction. Here is a detail worth noting: The software fix is “under development,” which means this issue is not resolved.

Advertisement

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Inventor Creates High-Voltage Suit to Fight Mosquitoes Head-On

Published

on

DIY Anti Mosquito Electric Suit
Mosquitoes turn pleasant summer nights into itchy ordeals for anyone spending time outdoors. One inventor refused to accept the usual sprays, candles, and frantic swatting as the only options. Instead he created a full-body electric grid that delivers a direct shock to any insect that gets too close. Russian maker Dani Cruster, who runs the DiWHY YouTube channel, drew inspiration from ordinary bug zappers. Those devices use two layers of mesh or grid with high voltage running between them. When a mosquito flies into the space, it completes the circuit and ends its life with a sharp crack. Cruster simply asked what would happen if someone wore that same grid.



He began with heavy-duty construction mesh, which is commonly used on construction sites. The metal netting turned out to be two electrode layers. Use a centimeter-thick PVC foam board to build the frames that hold the mesh in place. A heat gun, similar to the one used to warm up paint or drywall during a renovation, is used to soften the plastic, allowing it to be twisted into curved panels that fit around the torso, arms, and legs. The finished design resembles a jumble of old Roman armor cobbled together from materials available at any hardware store.

Sale


Buzbug LED Bug Zapper Indoor, 50000 H Long-Lasting LED, Energy Saving & Dual Band Attraction…
  • Upgraded Dual-Band Attraction: Unlike traditional single-band fly traps, the Buzbug LED bug zapper utilizes dual-color LEDs (365nm + 395nm) engineered…
  • Long-Lasting & Cost Saving: Stop wasting money on frequent bulb replacements. Our high-efficiency LED tubes boast an exceptional lifespan of 25,000 to…
  • High-Voltage & Wide Coverage: Equipped with a robust internal electric grid, this mosquito zapper delivers an instant kill upon contact. With a…

To deliver the electricity, he used six miniature high-voltage converters made from inexpensive shock guns found in markets. Each is powered by two regular 1.5 volt alkaline batteries and can produce an output of around 10,000 volts. Each module’s wires link to the panel’s inner and outer meshes. The builder meticulously checked all of the connections before placing the modules directly into the PVC frame. The distance between mesh layers is far more significant than anything else. High voltage can jump through the air, and the builder had worked out that a whole centimeter of space would keep sparks from reaching the person inside the suit. If it’s too small, you risk burning a hair or giving the wearer a painful shock. As long as the spacing is just right, the electricity will remain between the layers and zap any insects that pass through.

Advertisement

DIY Anti Mosquito Electric Suit
Things became a little more tricky when he decided he wanted to create an entire suit. He had to measure and cut eighteen individual pieces of PVC, heat and shape each one separately, and then stretch mesh across both sides of the frames. The inner mesh layers are all electrically linked, therefore electricity cannot easily reach the skin. Six units are connected in parallel to power the whole costume. The battery packs will last for approximately an hour before needing to be replaced with new cells.

DIY Anti Mosquito Electric Suit
When testing the suit, he began with only one arm panel. Testers felt a small tickle and saw hairs stand up on their arms, but the gap prevented any serious shocks. Throughout the live tests, the builder donned dielectric gloves and goggles. He made it a point to underline how dangerous high voltage is and how you should never try to reproduce it unless you have been properly warned about the dangers.

DIY Anti Mosquito Electric Suit
The real trial was a facility in the deep forests outside Tarkov in Russia’s Tver Oblast, an area infamous for swarms of mosquitoes and ticks. When the user of the expensive outfit stepped out into the thick of it all, flipped on the modules, and started making their way through the woods, as the results were rather swift. Any insects that came into contact with the mesh screen simply did not survive.
[Source]

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The Rust Ecosystem Gets an AI Security Engineer in Residence

Published

on

While the Rust Foundation has a Security Initiative to protect its ecosystem, “the threats have expanded,” they announced this week, “and so has the kind of help maintainers need.”

Much of this comes back to a single shift: Automated tooling (much of it now built on large language models) has gotten good enough to surface real vulnerabilities in open source code quickly and at scale. That is useful, and several large Rust projects have already received and fixed credible issues found this way. The same tooling has also made it trivial to generate vulnerability reports that look plausible and are worthless. Maintainers across the ecosystem are losing real hours sorting these from the reports that matter, and the noise tends to bury the signal.

So, with funding from the Alpha-Omega Project, the Rust Foundation is bringing on a full-time AI Security Engineer in Residence dedicated to the Rust ecosystem. This position is being funded with part of the $12.5M in open source security funding that the Linux Foundation announced in March.
The role exists to take pressure off maintainers. The person in this position will use a mix of human-led and AI-assisted methods to proactively review Rust itself and the crates the ecosystem leans on most and help us separate real, exploitable issues from false positives and low-signal noise before anything reaches a maintainer…

This role will run full-time for six months to start, with room to extend depending on what we learn and the funding available. Methods, playbooks, and prompts will be documented so the work doesn’t end with the contract. We are grateful that Rust is not embarking on this work in isolation. Several other ecosystems have received parallel Alpha-Omega grants for the same kind of work (e.g., the PHP Foundation and the Drupal Association) and we plan to share tooling, triage practices, and what we learn rather than duplicating work
A statement from Rust’s new AI Security Engineer in Residence acknowledges that “One of our next challenges is the wave of bugs discovered by the next generation of AI-powered developer tools.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025