Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

Stopping Fraud at Each Stage of the Customer Journey Without Adding Friction

Published

on

IP Reputation

Fraud prevention and user experience have long been treated as opposing forces: tighten security, and you risk alienating legitimate customers; loosen it, and you open the door to account takeovers, synthetic identities, and payment fraud. But modern threat intelligence platforms are dismantling that false choice.

Today’s most effective fraud prevention strategies operate silently in the background, combining dozens of risk signals in real time to block bad actors before they cause damage, without ever asking a legitimate user to jump through an extra hoop.

Security friction is not a neutral tax. Every unnecessary CAPTCHA, every step-up authentication prompt served to a legitimate user, and every false positive that blocks a good customer from completing a transaction carries a measurable cost. Cart abandonment rates spike when checkout flows become cumbersome.

New user registrations drop when signup forms are burdened with verification delays. And customer service costs rise when account recovery processes are opaque or slow.

Advertisement

At the same time, the cost of under-detection is catastrophic. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners estimates that organizations lose approximately 5% of annual revenue to fraud each year.

Payment fraud, account takeover, promo abuse, and synthetic identity fraud are not edge cases – they are persistent, organized, and increasingly automated. Fraudsters are running bots, rotating proxies, and leveraging credential stuffing toolkits that would make any IT professional’s hair stand on end.

Stats

Fraud at Signup: The Battle for Clean Accounts

Signup is the highest-leverage intervention point in the fraud lifecycle. Stop a fraudster from creating an account, and you prevent every downstream attack that account would have enabled — account takeovers, payment fraud, promo abuse, referral fraud, and synthetic identity monetization.

The challenge is that signup is also the highest-volume, highest-visibility touchpoint for legitimate new users, making false positives especially damaging to business growth.

Advertisement

At signup, the signals available to a fraud team are rich but must be evaluated with speed. Email address analysis should go far beyond simple syntax validation.

Is the domain newly registered? Is the mailbox active and deliverable? Has this address appeared in breach databases? Is it associated with a pattern of fraudulent registrations?

Similarly, phone number intelligence should evaluate carrier type (VOIP vs. mobile), line activity, porting history, and whether the number has been flagged across fraud networks.

IPQS dashboard

Fraud at Login: Defending the Account Layer

Login fraud – primarily account takeover (ATO) – represents one of the most damaging attack vectors in digital fraud. Credential stuffing attacks can compromise even accounts with strong original passwords if those credentials have been reused.

Advertisement

The scale of these attacks is staggering: automated toolkits can test hundreds of thousands of credential pairs per hour against a single target, and residential proxy networks make them difficult to block with traditional rate-limiting or IP filtering.

Frictionless ATO prevention requires detecting the anomaly without punishing the legitimate user. Legitimate logins follow recognizable patterns: familiar devices, typical geographic locations, consistent time-of-day windows, normal session velocities.

Deviations from these patterns, even subtle ones, can be powerful risk signals when combined with network and identity intelligence.

Learn how to apply the right fraud checks at the right time without slowing users down, request sample risk scoring data from IPQS for free today.

Advertisement

See how multi-layered detection identifies bots, emulators, and high-risk sessions to proactively prevent fraud before it hits your bottom line.

Try For Free

Fraud at Checkout: Protecting Revenue at the Finish Line

Checkout fraud sits at the intersection of identity fraud, payment fraud, and social engineering. At checkout, the convergence of identity and transaction signals is most powerful.

The email and phone attached to a new order should be evaluated for consistency with the claimed billing identity. The IP address should be checked not just for proxy use but for geographic consistency with the shipping address.

Device signals should be compared against the account’s login history. Payment instrument intelligence, including velocity across merchants, prior chargeback rates, and card BIN data, adds a financial risk dimension that purely identity-based approaches cannot provide.

Advertisement

How IPQS Operationalizes Frictionless Intelligence

IPQS represents the class of platform-level fraud intelligence tools that operationalize the multi-signal, layered approach described above.

While offering discrete point solutions for IP reputation, email validation, or phone verification, IPQS operates as a unified intelligence platform that evaluates all of these signals through a shared data model and returns composite risk scores optimized for real-time decision-making.

Dashboard stats

A tiered response strategy maps risk score ranges to response types that are proportional to both the likelihood and severity of fraud at each threshold.

High-risk sessions can be challenged with targeted, lightweight verification, a single tap push notification to a registered device, for example, rather than a full OTP flow. Only the highest-risk sessions, where the composite evidence strongly suggests fraud, should result in hard blocks or declines.

Advertisement

Check flow

For the vast majority of legitimate users, who will score in the low-risk tier, the experience is entirely seamless. For the small cohort of genuinely high-risk sessions, the additional friction is proportional, defensible, and targeted at exactly the sessions that warrant it.

IPQS provides unparalleled fraud prevention by producing the freshest and richest data available.

We offer real-time fraud prevention solutions with unmatched accuracy through our cyberthreat honeypot network, covering IP, device, email, phone number, and URL scanning worldwide. Our suite of tools provides tight security with customizable scoring settings and a simple fraud score for easy detection.

Book a free fraud consultation with one of our specialists today!

Advertisement

Sponsored and written by IPQS.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

OpenAI takes Codex into enterprise software shops worldwide

Published

on

OpenAI is building a systems integrator channel for Codex, enlisting large consulting firms to carry the coding agent into organisations it cannot reach through direct sales. Cognizant and CGI are the first named SI partners in the programme, announced on the same day. Codex has grown 6x among ChatGPT Business and Enterprise users since January.


OpenAI has launched a formal partner programme for Codex, its AI coding and software development agent, enlisting a select group of global systems integrators to deploy the product inside enterprise clients that lack the internal capability to implement and govern it themselves.

The first named partners, Cognizant (NASDAQ: CTSH) and CGI (NYSE: GIB), each announced their inclusion in the programme on 21 April, coinciding with OpenAI’s own blog post setting out the enterprise push.

Both firms describe being part of “a select group” of SIs chosen for their track record in deploying AI at enterprise scale. The programme is a distribution bet as much as a product one.

Advertisement

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

OpenAI’s direct sales organisation can reach technology-forward enterprises with dedicated engineering teams, but large-scale rollouts into complex, regulated, or legacy-heavy environments require the change management, systems integration, and industry-specific compliance expertise that consulting firms carry at scale.

Cognizant, with $21.1 billion in annual revenue and operations across financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, is embedding Codex into its Software Engineering Group as a standardised capability, both for its own delivery and as a tool it takes to clients.

Advertisement

CGI, whose engineers already use Codex in volume across government, public safety, and commercial sectors, gains early access to new Codex capabilities as part of the expanded agreement.

OpenAI’s chief revenue officer, Denise Dresser, framed the partnership in terms of the gap between early Codex adoption and repeatable deployment at scale.

“As enterprises move quickly to put Codex to work, we’re working with leading partners like Cognizant to help more organisations move from early usage to repeatable deployment,” she said.

The programme extends Codex’s scope beyond code generation: both partners are positioning it for legacy code modernisation, vulnerability detection, code review automation, and broader agentic workflow use cases beyond software development.

Advertisement

The backdrop to the announcement is a pattern of rapid enterprise adoption that has strained the product’s earlier model of direct-access usage. Codex now has 3 million weekly active developers, up from 2 million in mid-March and 1.6 million at the time of the desktop app launch in February.

Within ChatGPT Business and Enterprise, the number of Codex users grew 6x between January and April. OpenAI’s enterprise segment now accounts for more than 40% of its revenue and is on track to reach parity with consumer revenue by the end of 2026.

Named enterprise users include Notion, Ramp, Braintrust, GitHub, Nextdoor, Wonderful, Cisco, and Nvidia, among others.

The Codex partner programme builds on a broader enterprise alliance strategy OpenAI announced in February, when it unveiled Frontier Alliances with McKinsey, Boston Consulting Group, Accenture, and Capgemini, oriented around its Frontier agent platform rather than Codex specifically.

Advertisement

The distinction matters: Frontier Alliances are positioned as strategy-and-deployment partnerships for OpenAI’s enterprise agent infrastructure, while the Codex partner programme is a more targeted engineering-and-delivery play aimed at software teams.

Both tracks reflect the same underlying ambition: to use incumbent consulting relationships to accelerate adoption in the parts of the enterprise market that are slow to self-serve.

The dynamics of this channel push are uncomfortable for some established software vendors. Fortune has reported that investors in SaaS companies including Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow have repriced their stakes in part on the concern that enterprises will use AI coding agents such as Codex and Anthropic’s Claude Code to build bespoke software, eliminating the need for standard SaaS products.

Enlisting the same SI firms those vendors have historically depended on for sales and implementation accelerates that dynamic.

Advertisement

Accenture, Capgemini, Cognizant, and CGI each serve large incumbent software vendors and AI-native platforms simultaneously; the degree to which they tilt their Codex workloads away from existing enterprise software implementations will be the commercial signal to watch.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

YouTube is coming for celebrity deepfakes with new AI likeness detection tech

Published

on

YouTube is cracking down on celebrity deepfakes, and this time around, it is not just talking about the problem in vague platform-safety terms. In a new blog post, YouTube announced that it is expanding its likeness detection technology to the entertainment industry.

So now, the tools will be accessible to talent agencies and management companies for the celebrities they represent. This tool works in a way that is similar to Content ID, but rather than matching copyrighted media, it looks for AI-generated content using a person’s likeness and gives eligible participants the ability to find that content and request removal.

Why this is YouTube’s answer to AI celebrity fakes

The Content AI comparison here is key, since that is exactly how YouTube wants people to think about this. If the system works well, it could give high-profile people a much faster way to spot fake videos using their face before those clips spread too far.

And yes, this is clearly about celebrity fakes first. YouTube’s expanded program is aimed at the entertainment industry right now, with support from major talent agencies and management companies, including CAA, UTA, WME, and Untitled Management.

The company has worked with those groups to refine how the tool should serve talent, which suggests this has been shaped around the practical needs of public figures rather than launched as a generic moderation experiment.

Advertisement

One notable detail in the announcement is that celebrities and entertainers are eligible to access the tool even if they do not have a YouTube channel. In other words, it isn’t just a creator perk and functions more like a platform-wide control system. Deepfake scams, fake endorsements, and manipulated celebrity clips are no longer fringe internet weirdness. They’re a real part of online dangers.

How far is YouTube taking this

As of right now, the announcement is focused on the entertainment industry. YouTube did not announce a broad public rollout that protects regular users. We also have no details regarding how fast the detection system is or how proactive the company will be against these deepfakes.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Garmin Expands Retail Presence in India

Published

on

This year, Garmin has been working quite hard to improve its offline presence. And keeping with that momentum, the company has opened a new exclusive brand store in New Delhi. Unlike a typical retail outlet, Garmin’s new store focuses on giving customers a hands-on feel of its products. Visitors can try out a wide range of GPS-enabled smartwatches, including the Fenix series for endurance users, Forerunner models for training insights, Instinct for rugged outdoor use, and the premium MARQ collection.

The store also features wellness-focused options like the Venu and Vívoactive series, catering to users looking for everyday fitness tracking alongside advanced health insights.

More Than Just Smartwatches

Garmin is also using this space to showcase its broader ecosystem. This includes golf tech like launch monitors and simulators, indoor cycling solutions from the Tacx lineup (including the Neo Bike Plus), and handheld GPS devices built for navigation in challenging environments.

The idea is simple: instead of just selling devices, Garmin wants users to see how its products work together across different use cases—from fitness tracking to outdoor exploration and sports performance.

Advertisement

With this launch, Garmin continues to expand its offline footprint in India, complementing its presence across multi-brand outlets such as Just in Time, Helios, Reliance Digital, and Malabar Watches. The company is also active online through its website, Amazon, and Flipkart.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Job Cuts Driven By AI Are Rising On Wall Street

Published

on

Firms like Bank of America, Citi, Wells Fargo, and others are reporting strong profits while reducing head count and automating more work. “All of them credited A.I. to some degree … in areas ranging from the so-called back office, where tens of thousands of employees fill out paperwork to comply with various laws and regulations, to the front office, where seven-figure salaried professionals put together complicated financial transactions for corporate clients,” reports the New York Times. From the report: Less than four months ago, Bank of America’s chief executive, Brian T. Moynihan, volunteered in a TV interview what he would say to his 210,000 employees about the chance of artificial intelligence replacing human work. “You don’t have to worry,” he said. “It’s not a threat to their jobs.” Last week, after Bank of America reported $8.6 billion in profit for the first quarter — $1.6 billion more than the same period a year earlier — Mr. Moynihan struck a different tone. The bank’s bottom line, he said, was helped by shedding 1,000 jobs through attrition by “eliminating work and applying technology,” which he repeatedly specified was artificial intelligence. He predicted more of that in the months and years to come. “A.I. gives us places to go we haven’t gone,” Mr. Moynihan said.

The veneer of Wall Street’s longstanding assertion — that A.I. will enhance human work, not replace it — is rapidly peeling away, as evidenced by the current quarterly earnings season. JPMorgan Chase, Citi, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo racked up $47 billion in collective profits, up 18 percent, while shedding 15,000 employees. All of them credited A.I. to some degree with helping cut jobs and automate work in areas ranging from the so-called back office, where tens of thousands of employees fill out paperwork to comply with various laws and regulations, to the front office, where seven-figure salaried professionals put together complicated financial transactions for corporate clients.

Unlike executives in Silicon Valley, few major financial figures are stating outright that A.I. is eliminating jobs. Citi, for example, has pledged to shrink its work force by 20,000 people through what one executive described to financial analysts last week as the company’s “productivity and efficiency journey.” The bank is paying for A.I. software from Anthropic, Google, Microsoft and OpenAI, to automatically read legal documents, approve account openings, send invoices for trades and organize sensitive customer data, among other tasks, according to public statements by bank executives and two people familiar with Citi’s systems. Among the recent job cuts at Citi were scores of employees who were part of the bank’s “A.I. Champions and Accelerators” program, according to the two people, who were not permitted by the bank to speak publicly. The program involves Citi employees who perform their day jobs while also working to persuade their colleagues to adopt A.I. technologies.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Judge Acquits Penis Costume-Wearing Grandma While Saying Some Dumb Stuff About Probable Cause

Published

on

from the first-amendment-isn’t-subjective dept

Last fall, an Alabama police officer decided he wasn’t going to allow a 62-year-old woman to exercise her First Amendment rights — not if she was going to do so from inside an inflatable penis costume.

Yes, these are sentences we actually have to write here at Techdirt — things that seem so implausible you’d expect them to be generated from the sloppiest of AI prompts. It’s a real thing, though. It happened to Fairhope, Alabama resident Renea Gamble. It was inflicted by Fairhope PD officer Andrew Babb, who took apparently personal offense at Gamble’s inflatable penis costume and her “No Dick-Tator” sign she carried during a “No Kings” protest.

You can watch the arrest in all of its ingloriousness below. It’s alternately comical and horrifying. Horrifying, because it involves officers assaulting a 62-year-old grandmother. Comical, because multiple attempts are made to fit the person and costume into a police cruiser before deciding it might be easier if the person and costume were separated… which then leads to an officer discovering it’s kind of difficult to shove a non-resisting inflatable penis costume into the truck of a police car.

Advertisement

This arrest and resulting prosecution gained national attention. Rather than encourage the city to drop the prosecution, it seemingly emboldened it. Prosecutors waited until people had moved onto the next outage before dropping additional charges on Renea Gamble, including “disturbing the peace” and “giving a false name to law enforcement.” (The latter charge stemmed from Gamble telling the arresting officers her name was “Auntie Fa.”)

Officer Babb — as captured by his own recording — presented a very subjective take on the First Amendment when arresting Gamble. He not only demanded Gamble explain what he was supposed to tell his own kids if they happened to see her costume (wtaf?), but said her particular form of expression was inherently unlawful because Fairhope was “a family town.”

The officer was as wrong about free speech as the town officials who supported this arrest and prosecution. Fair hope mayor Sherry Sullivan called the costume an “obscene display.” City council president Jack Burrell said the costume “violated community standards,” without bothering to assess what the community’s standards actually were.

Fortunately/unfortunately for him, a local radio station did exactly that, arriving at the opposite conclusion:

Advertisement

In December, a Mobile-based talk radio station held a listener poll to choose its annual Alabamian of the Year, with “Inflatable Fairhope Protest Penis” receiving the most votes.

Much more legitimately fortunate is the disposition of Renea Gamble’s criminal case. As AL.com reports, it has been tossed by municipal judge Haymes Snedeker. However, Snedeker’s acquittal comes with some caveats that will make it a bit more difficult for Gamble to pursue a civil rights lawsuit in this particular venue:

Judge Haymes Snedeker, after a trial lasting more than two hours, said he did not believe Fairhope Police Cpl. Andrew Babb was attempting to suppress 62-year-old Renea Gamble’s free speech rights during their encounter at the anti-Trump protest. He also said there may have been enough probable cause for Babb to arrest her.

However, Snedeker said he was not 99.9% certain that Gamble should be convicted of crimes stemming from the actions that led to her arrest. She was found not guilty of misdemeanor charges of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, as well as a municipal violation for disturbing the peace and giving a false name to law enforcement.

Snedeker gives the officer too much credit, especially when his own statements during the arrest made it clear he was singling Gamble out because he didn’t agree with her particular form of free expression. The recording shows Gamble wanted to manhandle this penis because he was employed by a “family town” and didn’t want to have to explain to his kids what this costume might represent. He didn’t present anything approaching legal justification prior to pinning Gamble to the ground and handcuffing her.

The judge said all of this despite the officer’s testimony being completely undercut by the recording of the arrest.

Advertisement

Babb testified that he was using de-escalation techniques he was trained to employ as a police officer. He said he was concerned about safety and viewed Gamble’s costume as an “obstruction.” He said he did not arrest her because he was personally offended by the costume or her anti-Trump message.

[…]

[Gamble’s lawyer David] Gespass disagreed, arguing that body camera footage revealed the true nature of the arrest. In the footage, Babb tells Gamble that her costume would not be tolerated in a town that “has values.”

“That’s all he talked about when he was confronting her was, ‘I am not going to put up with this in my town,’” Gespass said. “He said nothing about her causing any problems with traffic. Certainly, if you watch the video, he is not de-escalating anything. He approached her aggressively.”

That wasn’t the only stupid thing said by the government. Here’s the prosecutor attempting to salvage an obviously bogus prosecution:

Advertisement

“There is no constitutional right to wear a total erect penis on the side of the road,” he said. “I’m sorry.”

Hmm. Seems wrong. Pretty sure in this context it’s protected speech. And all of these qualifiers suggest no prosecution would be happening if Gamble had simply let a little bit of the air out of the costume to appear a bit more flaccid.

Both the cop and the prosecutor (Marcus McDowell) are welcome to say dumb things in their own defense during testimony. For the judge to suggest this arrest might have been supported by probable cause demands a better explanation than what was given here. If the standard is only that one cop felt something violated the law, the First Amendment is meaningless. It’s the sort of thing that tells citizens their rights only matter once they’re violated… and even then, they still may not mean much. The judge blew the call here and the local cops know it. Gamble still has a target on her back and the cops have the judicial leeway to keep arresting protesters they personally don’t like.

Filed Under: alabama, andrew babb, david gespass, fairhope pd, free speech, haymes snedeker, no kings, penis, renea gamble, trump administration

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Trump says Anthropic Pentagon deal is ‘possible’

Published

on

The US president told CNBC on Tuesday that Anthropic is ‘shaping up’ following a White House meeting last Friday at which the company’s CEO Dario Amodei discussed its Mythos AI model with Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

The Pentagon’s blacklisting of Anthropic remains in legal limbo, with a federal appeals court and a San Francisco district court having reached conflicting conclusions.


President Donald Trump told CNBC’s Squawk Box on Tuesday that a deal allowing Anthropic’s AI models to be used within the Department of Defense is “possible,” describing the company as “shaping up.”

“They came to the White House a few days ago, and we had some very good talks with them, and I think they’re shaping up,” Trump said.

Advertisement

“They’re very smart, and I think they can be of great use.” The comments mark a striking rhetorical reversal from a president who, in late February, posted on Truth Social ordering all federal agencies to “IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic’s technology” and declared that his administration would “not do business with them again.”

Advertisement

Trump’s remarks follow a White House meeting on Friday 18 April at which Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei met Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to discuss the company’s new Mythos model, a frontier AI system Anthropic has described as highly capable at cybersecurity tasks and has so far made available only to a small group of organisations.

The White House described the conversation as “productive and constructive.” Anthropic said Amodei had a “productive discussion” with administration officials about how the company and the US government can “work together on key shared priorities such as cybersecurity, America’s lead in the AI race, and AI safety.”

When reporters asked Trump about the meeting on a runway in Phoenix, he responded “Who?” and said he had “no idea” Amodei had been there.

The meeting took place against the backdrop of a dispute that has few precedents in the relationship between Washington and the technology industry.

Advertisement

In July 2025, Anthropic signed a $200 million contract with the Pentagon, becoming the first AI lab to have its models approved for use on the DOD’s classified networks.

But as negotiations over Claude’s deployment on the department’s GenAI.mil platform began in September, talks broke down. The Pentagon demanded that Anthropic grant unfettered access to its models for all lawful purposes.

Anthropic drew two firm lines: its AI would not be used in fully autonomous weapons systems that select targets without human intervention, and it would not be used for domestic mass surveillance of Americans.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth responded by designating Anthropic a “supply chain risk to national security” in late February 2026, a label previously reserved for companies associated with foreign adversaries.

Advertisement

The formal designation, confirmed to Anthropic’s leadership on 5 March, required defense contractors to certify they were not using Anthropic’s models in work with the military. Trump amplified the measure with his Truth Social directive.

The designation was, as Anthropic argued in subsequent litigation, unprecedented: as US District Judge Rita Lin noted in a stinging 43-page ruling that granted Anthropic a preliminary injunction in late March, it appeared to be directed not at a genuine national security threat but at punishing the company for “bringing public scrutiny to the government’s contracting position”, “classic illegal First Amendment retaliation,” she wrote.

The legal situation remains split. A federal appeals court in Washington DC denied Anthropic’s request to temporarily block the supply chain risk designation on 8 April. Judge Lin’s preliminary injunction in San Francisco, from a separate but related case, bars enforcement of Trump’s Truth Social ban on Claude across the rest of the government.

The practical effect is that Anthropic is excluded from Pentagon contracts but can continue working with other government agencies while both cases proceed. The DOD has continued to use Claude during the US-Iran war, which began before the blacklisting took effect.

Advertisement

What appears to have shifted the White House’s posture is Mythos. Parts of the intelligence community and CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, have been testing the model.

The White HouseOffice of Management and Budget is setting up protocols to allow federal agencies to access a controlled version.

Treasury Secretary Bessent’s presence at Friday’s meeting was read by sources close to the negotiations as a signal that the economic and financial security arguments for Mythos access had reached the most senior levels of the administration.

As one administration source told Axios: “It would be grossly irresponsible for the US government to deprive itself of the technological leaps that the new model presents. It would be a gift to China.”

Advertisement

Whether any resumption of the Anthropic–Pentagon relationship is possible remains uncertain. Trump’s Tuesday comments refer to talks that have been promising but did not produce a deal.

The appeals court ruling on the supply chain risk designation still stands. Hegseth has not withdrawn his position. Anthropic, meanwhile, has engaged Ballard Partners, the lobbying firm where Wiles previously worked, for advocacy around Department of War procurement, a move that signals it understands the political dynamics as well as the legal ones.

The company’s annualised revenue has reached $30 billion and it is considering an IPO; the supply-chain risk designation damages enterprise credibility even where it does not block commercial deals.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

AI research lab NeoCognition lands $40M seed to build agents that learn like humans

Published

on

Investors are aggressively courting AI researchers to build startups that can make AI more reliable and efficient.

Yu Su, an Ohio State professor leading an AI agent lab, said he initially resisted the pressure from VCs to commercialize his work. He finally took the leap last year and spun out his work into a startup when he saw that foundational model advances could make agents truly personalized.

NeoCognition, a startup Su describes as a research lab developing self-learning AI agents, has just emerged from stealth with $40 million in seed funding. The round was co-led by Cambium Capital and Walden Catalyst Ventures, with participation from Vista Equity Partners and angels, including Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan and Databricks co-founder Ion Stoica.

“Today’s agents are generalists,” Su (pictured right) told TechCrunch. “Every time you ask them to do a task, you take a leap of faith.”

Advertisement

According to Su, the issue lies in a lack of consistency. Current agents, whether from Claude Code, OpenClaw or Perplexity’s computer tools, successfully complete tasks as intended only about 50% of the time, he said.

Since agents are still so unreliable, they are not ready to be trusted, independent workers, Su told TechCrunch. NeoCognition intends to change that by developing an agent system that can self-learn to become an expert in any domain, similar to how humans learn.

Su argues that while human intelligence is broad, its real power is our ability to specialize. When we enter a new environment or profession, we can rapidly master its unique rules, relationships, and consequences.

Techcrunch event

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

NeoCognition is building agents to mirror this exact approach.

Advertisement

“For humans, our continued learning process is essentially the process of building a world model for any profession, any environment,” Su said. “We believe for agents to become experts, they need to learn autonomously to build a model of any given micro world.”

Su views this capacity for rapid specialization as the critical missing link to getting AI to work reliably on its own.

While it is possible to train agents for autonomous tasks, they must be custom-engineered for a specific vertical. NeoCognition is different because it’s building agents that are generalists capable of self-learning and specializing in any domain.

NeoCognition intends to sell its agent systems primarily to enterprises, including established SaaS companies, which can use them to build agent-workers or to enhance existing product offerings.

Advertisement

Su highlighted that an investment from Vista Equity Partners is especially valuable for this reason. As one of the largest private equity firms in the software space, Vista can provide NeoCognition with direct access to a vast portfolio of companies looking to modernize their products with AI.

NeoCognition currently has about 15 employees, the majority of whom hold PhDs.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Meta To Start Capturing Employee Mouse Movements, Keystrokes For AI Training Data

Published

on

Reuters reports that Meta plans to start collecting U.S.-based employees’ mouse movements, clicks, keystrokes, and occasional screen snapshots to train AI agents that can better learn how humans use computers. The tool, called Model Capability Initiative (MCI), will reportedly “not be used for performance assessments or any other purpose besides model training and that safeguards were in place to protect ‘sensitive content.'” From the report: Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth told employees in a separate memo shared on Monday that the company would step up internal data collection as part of those “AI for Work” efforts, now re-branded as Agent Transformation Accelerator (ATA). “The vision we are building towards is one where our agents primarily do the work and our role is to direct, review and help them improve,” Bosworth said. The aim, he added, was for agents to “automatically see where we felt the need to intervene so they can be better next time.” Bosworth did not explicitly spell out how those agents would be trained, but said Meta would be “rigorous” about “building up data and evals for all the types of interactions we have as we go about our work.”

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone acknowledged that the MCI data would be among the inputs. […] “If we’re building agents to help people complete everyday tasks using computers, our models need real examples of how people “actually use them — things like mouse movements, clicking buttons, and navigating dropdown menus,” said Stone.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Audio-Technica at AXPONA 2026: Japan’s Quiet Giant Steps Into the Spotlight

Published

on

In a headphone market split between legacy brands that barely change and boutique players that release new models at a relentless pace, it’s easy to overlook the ones playing a longer, quieter game. Shure has built a reputation on consistency. Campfire Audio operates at the other extreme. Most brands fall somewhere in between.

That leaves a gap, and that’s where Audio-Technica operates. The Tokyo-based manufacturer doesn’t chase headlines or flood the market, but it brings decades of experience across both professional and consumer audio. At AXPONA 2026, that approach stands out. For newer enthusiasts, it’s a reminder that some of the most established names in personal audio are not always the loudest.

Why the Japanese Audio Brand Still Matters

Founded in Tokyo by Hideo Matsushita, Audio-Technica set out to make high quality audio accessible to a wider audience. The company began with phono cartridges in 1962 and expanded steadily into headphones, microphones, turntables, and wireless systems for broadcast and live sound. That pro side of the business still matters, even if it doesn’t always get the attention.

Today, Audio-Technica is one of the largest audio companies in Japan. Outside of cartridges, though, it can still fly under the radar for a lot of listeners. At the show, that low profile was hard to miss. Instead of setting up in the Ear Gear section where the headphone crowd tends to gather, the brand took a series of smaller rooms off the main path. Easy to walk past if you weren’t looking for them.

Advertisement
Audio-Technica NARUKAMI HPA-KG NARU Tube Headphone Amplifier
Audio-Technica NARUKAMI HPA-KG NARU Tube Headphone Amplifier at AXPONA 2026

That’s a shame, because the setup was one of the more complete at the show. Visitors could move from cartridge demos to a full spread of headphones, covering everything from entry-level models to the flagship end of the spectrum, including the $108,000 NARUKAMI HPA-KG NARU Tube Headphone Amplifier and its matching headphones.

Audio-Technica offers a headphone lineup that can stand alongside Sony, Beyerdynamic, and Sennheiser, with models that cover a wide range of prices and use cases. That includes everything from entry level wired designs to high-end open and closed back headphones, along with more niche offerings like wireless in-ear models tied to Star Wars characters. It is a broad catalog, but it rarely gets presented as aggressively as its competitors.

audio-technica-ath-awkg-axpona-2026

At AXPONA 2026, that range was on full display. I spent time with the flagship ATH-ADX7000 ($3,499 at Crutchfield), along with several of the step down open back models, and moved over to the closed back side with the Narukami system and the ATH-AWKG ($4,499 at Amazon), plus a few sub-flagship options.

The ADX7000 was not new territory. We have already reviewed it favorably, and both Editor-in-Chief Ian White and Editor-at-Large Chris Boylan placed it among their top three headphones from CanJam NYC 2026. That context matters because it frames the rest of the lineup. The flagship is not just competitive. It sets the tone for everything below it.

The house tuning of Audio-Technica headphones leans a bit brighter than what you typically get from Beyerdynamic or Sennheiser, with a noticeable lift in the presence region. Vocals come forward, strings have a bit more bite, and that works especially well with string quartets, concertos, vocal tracks, or a cappella arrangements. It’s not trying to sound polite. It’s trying to keep things engaging.

Advertisement

The upside is consistency. That same tuning shows up from the top of the line down to the entry level models. As you move up, you get more resolution, better control, and a cleaner presentation, but the core voicing doesn’t shift. The idea that Hideo Matsushita started with is still intact. You’re not relearning the sound every time you move up the ladder.

For those who haven’t spent time with the brand, the ATH-AD500X (open-back) and ATH-A550Z (closed-back) are easy entry points at around $150. They won’t match the technical performance of the flagships, but they give you a clear sense of what Audio-Technica is aiming for without asking for a major commitment.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

I was also able to speak with a representative from Audio-Technica about reviewing the newly released X-series models, which push the price of their open-back headphones down to as little as $59. That’s a meaningful shift for a brand that has traditionally started higher up the ladder. It opens the door for a lot more people to hear what that house sound is about without much risk.

Advertisement

I’m looking forward to spending time with those. The Audio-Technica models I already have get a lot of use with classical and jazz, and they offer a different perspective compared to the darker tuning you get from some of the established German brands. It’s not better or worse. Just a different take that a lot of listeners might find more engaging. The plan is to start with the X-series and work up the line so readers can see how that tuning evolves as the price climbs.

audio-technica-narukami-front-axpona-2026
audio-technica-narukami-angle-above-axpona-2026
audio-technica-narukami-tube-closeup

At the other end of the spectrum sits the NARUKAMI HPA-KG NARU Tube Headphone Amplifier and matching headphones. Only two units are currently in North America, which raises an obvious question. Were the other 23 already sold? At $108,000, in under two years, that would be quite a statement. Audio-Technica spent a decade developing that system and went through 11 prototypes before bringing it to market. It’s hard to justify on paper, but that’s not really the point. The design, build quality, and sonic performance are about as far as this category can be pushed right now.

And in the context of AXPONA 2026, it almost felt reasonable. There were plenty of speaker systems in the building that cost a lot more. Getting more time with it would require another trip to the show. I’m not expecting a loaner to show up anytime soon, but there’s no harm in asking.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

2026 Green Powered Challenge: A Low Power Distraction Free Writing Tool

Published

on

Distraction free writing tools are a reaction to the bells and whistles of the modern desktop computer, allowing the user to simply pick up the device and write. The etyper from [Quackieduckie] is one such example, packing an e-paper screen into a minimalist case.

These devices are most often made using a microcontroller such as an ESP32, so it’s interesting to note that this one uses a full-fat computer — if an Orange Pi Zero 2W can be described as “Full-fat”, anyway. There’s an Armbian image for it with the software pre-configured, and also mention of a Raspberry Pi port. It works with wired USB-C keyboards, and files can be retrieved via Bluetooth. It doesn’t look as though there’s a framebuffer or other more general driver for the display so it’s likely you won’t be using this as a general purpose machine, but maybe that’s not the point. We like it, though maybe it’s not a daily driver.

This hack is part of our 2026 Green Powered Challenge. You’ve just got time to get your own entry in, so get a move on!

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025