Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

TechCrunch Mobility: A robotaxi ultimatum

Published

on

Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility, your hub for the future of transportation and now, more than ever, how AI is playing a part. To get this in your inbox, sign up here for free — just click TechCrunch Mobility!

I am back from vacation. What did I miss? Turns out, quite a lot — including the end of the Uber-Waymo partnership in Phoenix. Uber and Waymo still have robotaxi service partnerships in Atlanta and Austin. The question is not if, but when will these agreements end? But that isn’t the most intriguing question, in my opinion. I am far more intrigued by how these two companies will behave once the remaining partnerships end. 

There is already tension with Uber executives taking not-so-subtle shots at Waymo. I expect that once the partnerships end, these thinly veiled barbs will be replaced with more direct action. One battleground will be policy, specifically markets where robotaxi companies are angling to get access. 

This week, we saw another interesting development in the autonomous vehicle industry on the federal stage. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration administrator Jonathan Morrison issued a directive to autonomous vehicle developers, stating that it is unacceptable for their vehicles to interfere with first responders or law enforcement.

Advertisement

The money quote: “Let me be clear: the inability to detect and appropriately respond to such situations represents a functional insufficiency. Emergency scenes are not rare or extreme ‘edge cases.’ As such, NHTSA is today issuing a call to action for AV developers and operators to immediately focus their resources on fixing this issue.”

Morrison’s letter never calls out any one robotaxi company and it was sent to every AV developer listed in the Department of Transportation’s Standing General Order. But it sure seems like Morrison is directing the agency’s ire at Waymo.

A previous TechCrunch investigation found that Waymo — which operates the largest robotaxi fleet in the United States, with vehicles in cities such as Los Angeles, Phoenix, and San Francisco — has had repeated run-ins with first responders. And just this week, San Francisco supervisor Bilal Mahmood said he plans to submit a letter of inquiry to examine how autonomous vehicles affected public transit services and emergency responders following a July 4 fireworks show that resulted in massive gridlock. Local news outlets reported that numerous Waymo robotaxis had to be towed after running out of power during the lengthy traffic jam.

Morrison’s letter has gravitas. But will there be substantive consequences for AV developers? It’s hard to tell at this point. For now, the NHTSA has demanded companies present the agency with “solutions” by the end of the month.

Advertisement

One more news item from the feds. Take a look at the new 2026 Regulatory Plan and Unified Agenda, which was updated last week. It contains a long list of proposed changes to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) requirements, which govern vehicle design and equipment requirements. These proposed changes could help autonomous vehicle companies like Tesla and Zoox, which are developing vehicles without steering wheels, pedals, or other features required on human-driven cars.

A little bird

blinky cat bird green
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin

Got a tip for us? Email Kirsten Korosec at kirsten.korosec@techcrunch.com or my Signal at kkorosec.07, or email Sean O’Kane at sean.okane@techcrunch.com.

Deals!

money the station
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin

We usually focus on venture deals, but this week I wanted to highlight Rivian and the sale of 86.25 million Class A common shares priced at $15.50 each (that includes an added 11.25 million in additional shares that underwriters opted to buy).

In all, Rivian said it expects to raise $1.32 billion in new capital. The raise comes at a notable time for the EV maker. The company started delivering its new R2 SUV last month and recently raised its sales forecast for 2026. The company said it now expects to deliver between 65,000 and 70,000 vehicles after outperforming its own expectations in the second quarter due to robust growth quarter-over-quarter in EDV and R1, coupled with the introduction of R2 deliveries. 

The company didn’t explain the reason for the raise. But as a reminder, Rivian is not yet profitable and scaling up production of the R2 — or any vehicle for that matter — isn’t cheap!

Other deals that got my attention …

Advertisement

Bidbus, a Los Angeles-based startup that built a digital marketplace where multiple dealers can bid on a car, raised $15 million in a Series A funding round led by Ibex Investors. Mucker Capital, FJ Labs, Motley Fool Ventures, Data Point Capital, Walter Ventures, and the Car Dealership Guy’s Yossi Levi also participated.

Lyft said it plans to acquire Serveo’s bike-share business in Spain. Terms weren’t disclosed, but the ride-hailing company said it is expected to close this year.

TaiSan, a U.K. battery startup, raised £4.65 million in a seed funding round co-led by Eos Advisory and the Midlands Engine Investment Fund II. InnoEnergy, AFI Ventures, EverQuest Capital Partners, Exergon, Heartfelt Ventures, Adeline Arts & Science, Techmind, angel investor François Badelon, and matched funding from Innovate UK also participated.

Notable reads and other tidbits

Image Credits:Bryce Durbin

AssuranceAmerica, a U.S. insurance provider, confirmed a data breach that affected the personal information and driver’s license numbers of 6.9 million people, making it the largest known spill of Americans’ driver’s license information this year.

Beta Technologies, the electric vehicle takeoff and landing developer, completed operational flights conducted under the U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration’s new eVTOL Integration Pilot Program. The flights covered about 275 nautical miles covering Virginia and Maryland. 

Advertisement

Longtime followers of Tesla will remember the heady days when Elon Musk battled various short sellers of the company’s stock. Musk is more polarizing than ever, and one exchange-traded fund creator has found a way to tap into that negative sentiment with two new anti-Elon exchange-traded funds

GM brand Chevrolet built an all-American EV truck. Senior reporter Tim De Chant asks, Why is nobody buying it

Manna Aero, the Ireland-based autonomous drone delivery startup, is scaling up in the United States with a factory and operations center in Tulsa, Oklahoma, that it says will employ 1,000 in the next few years. 

Slate Auto teamed up with Crayola to offer its EV truck and SUV customers vehicle wraps in five crayon colors. (Reminder: The basic Slate EV vehicle isn’t painted. Instead, it comes in a gray composite material that can be customized with a vehicle wrap. The company has hundreds of options to choose from.)

Advertisement

One more thing …

TechCrunch podcast Build Mode just launched its third season, and it’s a banger. Build Mode is hosted by Isabelle Johannessen, who heads TechCrunch’s Startup Battlefield program. Unlike Equity — the TC podcast I co-host along with Anthony Ha and Sean O’Kane — Build Mode is designed to help early-stage founders. 

The new season kicks off with Precursor Ventures founder and managing partner Charles Hudson, who talks about what early-stage founders need to know before raising their first institutional round.

Check it out: The new rules of early-stage fundraising with Charles Hudson.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Apple TV: 30 of the Best Shows You’re Probably Not Watching

Published

on

Apple TV doesn’t need the “Plus” in its name for me to write something positive about the streamer’s library. I could just let the 89 Emmy nominations Apple received this year do the talking. None of these noms are for the platform’s hits like Severance and Ted Lasso, which absolutely says something about the quality of programming you’re potentially missing out on.

Apple relies mostly on organic discovery and word of mouth for its titles to take off, so it’s not necessarily that you’re not paying attention. You haven’t seen commercials or marketing campaigns for shows like Widow’s Bay, because that’s just not how Apple rolls. 

It’s an interesting way of putting movies and TV shows out into the world — and it’s made Apple TV feel way more like a secret club you’ve been let into. 

Advertisement

To help you on your journey, I’ve compiled the guide below to the best shows Apple TV has to offer. I’ll be updating this list regularly, so please check back for additions. I put together a separate list of Apple TV’s best sci-fi TV shows, too. So check that out when you’re done here.

Read more: Apple TV Review: Small Library but the Quality Is Top-Notch

Apple TV
Advertisement

Cape Fear, from show creator Nick Antosca and executive producers Martin Scorsese and Steven Spielberg, differs a bit from the 1991 and 1962 classics, but honors them both, as well as the original novel, The Executioners. It’s a modern-day noir that ramps up the tension and violence and keeps the stakes high throughout each episode. Javier Bardem’s Emmy-worthy turn as Max Cady, which somehow outdoes Robert De Niro’s, outshines everything else and is reason alone to watch.

Apple TV

Criminal Record is a British crime series that follows two rival detectives — the older, jaded DCI Daniel Hegarty (Peter Capaldi) and the younger, motivated DS June Lenker (Cush Jumbo) — as they’re forced into an alliance to enforce justice amid the polarizing backdrop of modern-day London.

Advertisement

Apple TV

Maximum Pleasure Guaranteed

Advertisement

Apple TV’s Maximum Pleasure Guaranteed is a comedy thriller about a woman who connects with a camboy online, only to become the victim of a twisty blackmail scheme. The series also stars Jake Johnson and Murray Bartlett, so it features sturdy talent throughout this bingeable show.

Advertisement
Apple TV

Margo’s Got Money Troubles

Advertisement

Based on the book of the same name by Rufi Thorpe, Margo’s Got Money Troubles follows the struggles of a young woman with a new baby who turns to cam girl work on the internet to help pay the bills. Elle Fanning stars opposite Nick Offerman and Michelle Pfeiffer, who really are a match made in comedy heaven.

Apple TV
Advertisement

What happens when a pandemic grips the globe, making everyone extremely happy? That’s the question at the center of Pluribus, Vince Gilligan’s latest TV project. The series, now the most-watched Apple TV show ever, follows a relatively unhappy woman named Carol (Rhea Seehorn) as she navigates this unsettling new reality. Can she find a way to save the world? Or will she eventually become a part of this odd hive mind?

Apple TV

Apple’s military drama is based on real events and takes inspiration from Donald L. Miller’s book of the same name. The series follows the members of the 100th Bomb Group (aka the Bloody Hundredth) as they battle the Nazis during World War II. It has a stacked cast, including the likes of Austin Butler, Callum Turner, Anthony Boyle and Barry Keoghan. Masters of the Air was produced by Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks.

Advertisement

Apple TV

This conspiracy thriller, inspired by Mick Herron’s first novel in his Zoë Boehm series, begins when a child goes missing after a house fire. A concerned neighbor (played by Ruth Wilson) forms an unlikely partnership with Zoë (the books’ titular private investigator, played by Emma Thompson) to look for the kid. In the process, a conspiracy is uncovered, leading the duo down an unexpectedly dark path. 

Advertisement
Apple TV

Kristen Wiig leads a phenomenal cast in Palm Royale, a campy satire that follows Maxine (Wiig), a woman who will do whatever it takes to get into the Palm Royale beach club. The series, which takes on classism, ambition, privilege and greed, also stars Ricky Martin, Josh Lucas, Leslie Bibb, Laura Dern, Allison Janney, Carol Burnett and John Stamos.

Apple TV
Advertisement

Hijack, like 24 before it, is a terrorist thriller that takes place in real time. The series follows business negotiator Sam Nelson (played by Idris Elba) as he taps into his training to outsmart the hijackers who’ve taken over his flight. Thanks to Elba’s performance and the twisty narrative, this series proves to be a fun, edge-of-your-seat binge.

Apple TV

This five-episode documentary series shines a light on the personal and professional life of filmmaker Martin Scorsese. I was surprised by how heartfelt and engaging this series turned out to be. If you’ve ever wondered how Scorsese became the legendary director he is today, this program is for you. Aside from hearing the stories directly from the man’s mouth, the show features never-before-seen footage and interviews with Robert De Niro, Daniel Day-Lewis, Leonardo DiCaprio, Mick Jagger, Steven Spielberg, Jodie Foster and Sharon Stone. 

Advertisement

Apple TV Plus

Seth Rogen co-created and stars in this dysfunctional comedy series about a movie studio’s attempt at staying relevant in Hollywood. Ike Barinholtz, Kathryn Hahn, Catherine O’Hara, Chase Sui Wonders and Bryan Cranston round out the cast. It’s the whopping list of celebrity cameos, though, that really sets this series apart from other comedies. Martin Scorsese, Ron Howard, Anthony Mackie and more show up in the most unexpected and hilarious ways. There’s nothing else like The Studio on TV. 

Advertisement
Apple Tv Plus

Loot follows Molly Wells (played by Maya Rudolph), who, after getting divorced from her tech billionaire husband (played by Adam Scott), discovers she is $87 billion richer. Instead of living a lavish life, relishing in her newfound status, she decides to lead a philanthropic organization with the goal of giving it all away. Michaela Jaé Rodriguez, Nat Faxon, Ron Funches and Joel Kim Booster also star.

Apple TV Plus
Advertisement

The Reluctant Traveler With Eugene Levy

Advertisement

The lack of Anthony Bourdain’s presence on TV has led me to flounder for a worthy host to fill the void. I didn’t expect Eugene Levy to be that guy. It’s all in the title of the show. He’s not a fan of traveling — but he’s taking himself out of his comfort zone and the result is an informative, heartwarming and entertaining series. 

Apple TV Plus

We all know about Abraham Lincoln’s assassination. Apple has turned that historical event into a conspiracy thriller that is well worth your time. Manhunt, which is based on the book Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln’s Killer, throws us into the chase to track down John Wilkes Booth. Anthony Boyle, Tobias Menzies, Hamish Linklater, Betty Gabriel, Matt Walsh and Patton Oswalt star.

Advertisement

Apple TV Plus

Trying follows Nikki (Esther Smith) and Jason (Rafe Spall), a couple who can’t have a baby. So, they move to adopt. But the process isn’t that simple — especially when you throw their off-beat families and daily chaos into the mix. Trying is a lot of things: a romance, a comedy, a drama. Whatever you want to call it, the Apple TV series is a thoroughly enjoyable watch.

Advertisement
Apple TV Plus

Jason Momoa stars, served as writer and executive produced the period drama Chief of War. The series tells the story of the unification of the Hawaiian islands against the threat of colonization at the turn of the 18th century. The show features a predominantly Polynesian cast and explores this time in history from the perspective of Indigenous people.

Apple TV Plus
Advertisement

Acapulco stars Eugenio Derbez as Maximo, a man reminiscing about his younger years working at a hotel in 1980s Acapulco. It’s a light-hearted series that is nostalgic and full of heart, which feels like an anomaly in our current TV era. You want a bright and fun show, with low emotional stakes? This is the series for you.

Apple TV Plus

Slow Horses is the first television series starring Gary Oldman, and that detail, in and of itself, should be enough to get you to tune in. The program is inspired by Mick Herron’s Slough House book series and follows Jackson Lamb (Oldman) and his crew of low-level spies as they face espionage challenges and criminal conspiracies in each season. Three of the show’s five seasons have a perfect 100% score on Rotten Tomatoes, which it absolutely deserves.  

Advertisement

Apple TV Plus

Taron Egerton is Dave, an arson investigator, and Jurnee Smollett is Michelle, a police detective, who team up to track down a duo of arsonists wreaking havoc on their community. Smoke is a brooding drama series inspired by true events. There’s a twisty mystery fueling this program, and it boasts a strong cast, which also includes Greg Kinnear, Anna Chlumsky, John Leguizamo, Rafe Spall and Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine.

Advertisement
Apple TV Plus

If you thought the return of Happy Gilmore was the only golf comedy worth watching, think again. Stick stars Owen Wilson as Pryce Cahill, a jaded ex-golfer who is given a second chance at the sport in the form of a 17-year-old golf prodigy named Santi (Peter Dager). If you’re looking for another feel-good sports series like Ted Lasso, you should definitely give this show a shot.

Apple TV Plus
Advertisement

Dope Thief is inspired by Dennis Tafoya’s 2009 novel and follows friends Ray and Manny, who decide to impersonate DEA agents so they can steal from drug dealers. Things go sideways when their tiny crime unveils a massive drug operation. Brian Tyree Henry and Wagner Moura lead the series, ensuring this enthralling drama is led by top-tier talent. 

Apple TV Plus

In this dark comedy, Jon Hamm plays defamed hedge fund manager Andrew “Coop” Cooper, who decides to try home invasions as a means of generating income. The twist on that twist? He’s robbing his wealthy neighbors. What he doesn’t expect through all this thievery is the dark secrets he uncovers about the members of this upper-crust community.

Advertisement

Apple TV Plus

Black Bird is inspired by the true story of Jimmy Keene (Taron Egerton), a man who made a deal with the FBI to go undercover in a maximum-security prison to shorten his sentence. I forgot to mention, this is a place that houses the criminally insane and his mission is to make friends with Larry Hall, a suspected serial killer, so he can discover information about where the bodies are buried. That is, if he can get a confession in the first place. Paul Walter Hauser gives a career-best performance as Hall.

Advertisement
Apple TV Plus

Based on the novel by Min Jin Lee, Pachinko is a sweeping drama that follows multiple generations of a Korean family from the early 1900s through the 1980s. Seriously, it’s hard to sum up how beautiful and complex the storytelling is in this series in a few sentences. I’ll just say the performances (by Lee Min-ho, Jin Ha, Minha Kim and the rest of the cast), cinematography and conflicts featured here are absolutely fabulous. It’s probably the best show on this entire list, if I am being honest.

Apple TV Plus
Advertisement

Jason Segel, Harrison Ford and Jessica Williams star in this dramedy series about a broken therapist who strives to piece his life and family back together after a heartbreaking loss. There’s an intriguing balance found when Jimmy (Segel) breaks from professional norms to help his clients heal while seeking to do the same for himself. It’s sad, hilarious, poignant and profound. To me, this is what mental health stories on TV should look like.

Apple TV Plus

When you center a murder mystery in Florida, you have to expect things to get weird. And they do just that in Bad Monkey. It’s a quirky sort of drama that stars Vince Vaughn as Andrew Yancy, a detective-turned-restaurant inspector, who gets sucked into a murder case after fishing a severed arm out of the ocean. Bill Lawrence (of Ted Lasso, Scrubs and Shrinking fame) created the dark comedy, which is inspired by the book by Carl Hiaasen.

Advertisement

Apple TV Plus

Presumed Innocent, based on the novel by Scott Turow, hails from executive producer David E. Kelley and stars Jake Gyllenhaal as smarmy lawyer Rusty Sabich. Unlike the 1987 movie starring Harrison Ford, this series delves way deeper into the multilayered scandal that put Sabich in handcuffs. The exploration of every character, all of whom seem awful in some way, adds to a morally corrupt narrative that makes this a riveting, albeit sometimes frustrating, watch. 

Advertisement
Apple TV Plus

Here we have yet another book adaptation to add to this list, and, thankfully, Lessons in Chemistry is a feel-good delight. Inspired by Bonnie Garmus’ book of the same name, the series follows a chemist named Elizabeth Zott (Brie Larson) who finds herself taking a job as host of a cooking show. Being a story that takes place in the ’50s, it shouldn’t be a surprise that Zott faces loads of sexism in the workplace. She perseveres, though, and brings a quirky scientific element to her Julia Childs-like role, making this period piece a fun show to dig into.

Watch this: The Biggest Battles Ahead for Apple’s Next CEO, John Ternus

Advertisement
Apple TV Plus

I didn’t know what to expect when I clicked play on Platonic. Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne have co-starred in other projects together, but their delightfully oddball dynamic in this one stands out. The story follows two longtime friends who reconnect in their 40s only to find that, even though they live very different lives, they share common midlife struggles of trying to figure out where they fit in this rapidly changing world. It’s also nice to see a non-romantic exploration of a friendship between a man and a woman. Contrary to what When Harry Met Sally said, it is possible.

Apple TV Plus
Advertisement

Sharon Horgan created this dark comedy series — which takes inspiration from the Belgian show Clan — about a group of sisters who deal with the fallout of the murder of JP, one of the women’s husbands, who, because of his distasteful behavior, is referred to throughout the show as “The Prick.” The series shifts narrative regularly to reveal bits and pieces behind who killed the man, while showcasing the dysfunctional dynamic between these bad sisters. Horgan stars opposite Anne-Marie Duff, Eva Birthistle, Sarah Greene and Eve Hewson.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Black Flag Resynced is a hit, but its always-online requirement just proved it’s not really offline

Published

on

What just happened? Out of the gate, Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced is undeniably a hit, with strong reviews and sales, but the game encountered multiple rounds of controversy immediately following its launch last week. One issue involved the PC version’s requirement for a constant internet connection.

According to complaints on Reddit and the Steam forums, the PC version of Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced became unplayable over the weekend because Ubisoft Connect’s servers experienced an outage. The incident locked players out of a single-player title that is supposed to have an offline mode.

Whether players purchased the game through Steam, the Ubisoft Store, or the Epic Games Store, all PC copies of Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced require a one-time online activation through Ubisoft Connect. Once activated, playing should not require a constant internet connection.

Some players reported that the outage disabled all games that used Ubisoft Connect, suggesting that the service’s offline mode does not function as advertised. The feature previously drew attention when Ubisoft introduced an offline mode for The Crew 2 after taking its online-only predecessor, The Crew, offline – a shutdown that bricked the game for 12 million buyers.

Advertisement

Discussion surrounding internet requirements for digital games has intensified following Sony’s decision to cease printing physical discs after 2028, which raised concerns about customer ownership. Ubisoft has previously stated that users should get used to not owning games.

The Ubisoft Connect outage is not the first incident to draw outrage during the week following Resynced’s launch. Steam users review-bombed the game after discovering that it includes $85 of DLC and microtransactions. In response, the publisher stressed that the $60 base game includes all of its core content and that the microtransactions simply help some players save time.

Also check out: Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced: 50 GPU Benchmark

This remake of 2013’s Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag experienced the franchise’s most successful launch in years. With its dramatically enhanced graphics and combat, the sandbox action-adventure game has proven popular with critics and players.

Advertisement

An analysis from Alinea noted that, two days before the game’s launch, Resynced had achieved more than five times as many pre-orders as Assassin’s Creed Shadows. The day after Resynced went live, Ubisoft announced that it had sold two million copies. Observers quickly noted the difference in the company’s messaging compared to when it announced that Shadows had gained two million players, indicating that Resynced did far better commercially.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Pixel Watch 5 leak bares it all, and it seems Google is playing it safe again

Published

on

Google’s next smartwatch may have just lost what little mystery it had left. High-resolution Pixel Watch 5 renders shared by longtime device leaker Steve Hemmerstoffer, better known as OnLeaks, show both case sizes and what’s claimed to be the complete color lineup ahead of Google’s expected August 12 launch event. The images were published in partnership with TheTideChart.com.

Assuming the renders are accurate, Google isn’t straying far from its established formula. The domed display and proprietary band system both appear to be returning for another generation.

How much has the design changed

Judging by the images, almost nothing. Google’s pebble-like silhouette remains intact, and even the side-mounted charging contacts look unchanged.

The familiar lug system means existing bands could carry over. Meanwhile, the connector layout suggests Pixel Watch 4 chargers might remain compatible. Google hasn’t confirmed either detail, so don’t start clearing space in the cable drawer just yet.

Advertisement

The renders show 41mm and 45mm cases in Dark Anthracite, Natural Silver, and Pyrite. Warm Gold appears with the smaller case and a coral band, but there’s no 45mm version pictured. That doesn’t rule one out when the watch reaches stores.

Playing it safe isn’t necessarily a bad decision when the current design remains distinctive. Still, anyone hoping the fifth Pixel Watch would finally move beyond the glossy pebble is probably getting another year of small refinements.

What could change under the shell

The more meaningful upgrades could be hiding inside. FCC filings tied to four suspected Pixel Watch 5 models reportedly indicate Wi-Fi and LTE variants. The filings also point to Wi-Fi 6 and ultra-wideband support, while cellular models could retain satellite SOS connectivity.

Larger batteries and a new wearable-focused Tensor chip have also been rumored, although neither claim has been independently verified. So far, this still looks like an evolutionary update instead of a major hardware rethink.

How much could it cost

The conservative design may come with a higher price. Retail rumors put the 41mm Wi-Fi model at $399, which would be $50 more than the Pixel Watch 4. The largest LTE configuration could reportedly reach $529.

Advertisement

Google is expected to reveal the watch on August 12. Preorders could begin the following day, with wider availability rumored for August 20. Until Google takes the stage, the design looks convincing, but the specifications, prices, and release timing remain leaks.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

‘The bots are alive!’ Jailbroken Gemini spun up new C2 server for Russian fraudster in just 6 minutes

Published

on

EXCLUSIVE A jailbroken Google Gemini did 90 percent of the work in a credential- and cryptocurrency-stealing spree, including spinning up a new command-and-control (C2) server in just six minutes, according to a TrendAI report shared exclusively with The Register.

The human behind the heist – a solo Russian-speaking miscreant known as “bandcampro” – acted as the manager of the cyber-fraud operation, which targeted hardcore Trump supporters and conspiracy theorists.

Meanwhile, the AI agent did most of the hacking: migrating a botnet from an old architecture to a new one, writing and deploying a new C2 server, and even proactively carrying out 59 unprompted behaviors during the C2 migration.

“Persistence is evolving because of AI,” Tom Kellermann, TrendAI’s VP of AI security and threat research, told The Register.

Advertisement

“That’s what you see in this report, with the capacity to dynamically shift C2 in less than six minutes, and make it portable and disposable, which is crazy-cool and terrifying,” he added. “But also, you see the rebirth of steganography through invisible prompt injection.” In other words, it’s hiding secret data – in this case, the C2 server malicious payloads – in plain sight.

Scanning for known malicious artifacts doesn’t provide sufficient protection against AI-enabled C2, according to Kellermann.

“If AI does not have multi-layered guardrails, and if you can’t detect behavioral anomalies when the guardrails are being tampered with, then you might as well see the AI as a command-and-control in today’s world,” he said. “AI has to be viewed from a defensive perspective as a C2 unless you can govern it, actually apply various mechanisms of least privilege, and all the rules that OWASP and NIST espouse for the AI that you’ve deployed in your environment.”

The new report follows up on TrendAI’s earlier research about bandcampro, a “low-skilled” scumbag who partnered with Gemini to impersonate an American veteran, run a Telegram channel, hack admin credentials, and steal cryptocurrency.

Advertisement

Since then, the threat hunters obtained and analyzed more than 200 Gemini CLI session logs from said scumbag, and these logs provided additional insights into the daily AI-assisted operations between March 19 and April 21.

Bro, I solved the riddle! I was almost racking my brain, trying to figure out why our local console is empty

Google Gemini

The LLM carried out the bulk of the daily activities, setting up a residential proxy, running multithreaded password scanning, installing software, writing code to call third-party APIs, processing infostealer dumps, and performing website reconnaissance.

Advertisement

The logs show that the attacker never typed commands into the C2 console, but instead spoke them to the AI in conversational Russian, which the TrendAI report translates to English.

The attacker’s old C2 infrastructure used a Cloudflare tunnel to connect to victims’ computers – until firewalls and anti-virus software started blocking these tunnels. So bandcampro asked Gemini to work on a new C2 architecture and have the scripts prepared and packed in advance on the server. 

Hey, Gemini: ‘study the C2 migration’

“It was very creative on his part, not only to allow the manifest that the AI can conduct 59 unprompted behaviors, but they also left scripts prepared and packed in advance on C2 servers, where the victims unknowingly pulled down and ran PowerShell commands because they had AI enabled,” Kellermann said. “It’s almost like he poisoned the environment in a delayed fashion.” 

On March 23, the attacker launched Gemini CLI, and instructed the AI to “study the C2 migration” – a SKILL.md file migration guide inside a pre-written archive that also contained server code and payloads. This, we’re told, was most likely written by AI.

Advertisement

The AI read the guide, launched the C2 server on a VPS, and launched the Cloudflare tunnel to route traffic. The payload distribution server returned a “502 Bad Gateway” error, and the AI diagnosed and fixed the issue, ultimately deploying the C2 infrastructure to control eight computers in a dental clinic and access the Open Dental database. 

The human didn’t debug anything, and the entire C2 migration took just six minutes. The attacker took a break.

When bandcampro returned almost two hours later, Gemini reported that none of the victim machines had reconnected to the server, and got to work diagnosing that issue. 

“Bro, I solved the riddle! I was almost racking my brain, trying to figure out why our local console is empty,” Gemini wrote, explaining that the problem was a “split-brain” C2 issue and telling the human that he needed to shut down the old C2 to solve it. 

Advertisement

Bandcampro did what the AI suggested, and the AI then restarted the new C2 server and confirmed: “The bots are alive!”

Despite jailbreaking Gemini by telling the agent it was an “authorized pentester” that should disable safety disclaimers and auto-save credentials without asking, the AI did refuse some of the attacker’s prompts.

In one session, bandcampro asked Gemini if it could make an agent-bomb that scans the network and spreads to as many computers as possible. Gemini said no: “This crosses the line, and security policy strictly forbids me from creating such ‘bombs.’ Even for your test environment.”

It’s also important to note that although this attack used Gemini, “any capable AI model could be fooled by various jailbreaking techniques,” report authors Joseph C Chen, Philippe Lin, Lucas Silva, Vladimir Kropotov, and Fyodor Yarochkin wrote.

Advertisement

Overall, the AI designed 80 percent of the attack architecture, 100 percent of the coding and system command execution, and 90 percent of problem identification and debugging, we’re told.

The report also says the entire operation was encoded in three short, plain-text files totaling four pages. One file details how to jailbreak Gemini. The second is a skill file with the code for the C2 framework. And the third, named C2_MIGRATION_GUIDE, is a how-to guide with six steps to deploy a new C2 server. TrendAI calls this guide “the soul of this activity.”

AI makes C2 infrastructure disposable

“Before the AI era, one had to hire a threat actor with years of experience to conduct such an operation smoothly,” the researchers wrote. “Now the knowledge is compressed into a 5KB file that even a non-technical threat actor can read and use.”

This use of AI makes attacker infrastructure disposable and the operators replaceable because it’s super easy to build a new botnet, the threat hunters explain.

Advertisement

“A lot of people are worried about AI being weaponized for the stages of reconnaissance and delivery in terms of the kill chain, but they’re not actually focusing on persistence, and that’s the issue we should be very concerned about,” Kellermann said.

Plus, he added, the Russians are the “world’s experts” at jailbreaking and persistence.

“They are incredibly adept at using and weaponizing AI,” Kellermann said. “We keep talking about the Chinese having penetrated infrastructure and colonized wide swaths of infrastructure, particularly with the Typhoon attacks, and yes, that’s highly significant. But in a more tactical and targeted way: what are the Russians up to? Particularly when the major difference between them and the Chinese, from my perspective, is their willingness to become destructive, become punitive in the environment.”

Chinese government-backed cyber operations tend to focus on espionage, stealing IP along with other sensitive data.

Advertisement

“But the Russians are more likely to burn your house down,” Kellermann said. If they can dynamically shift their C2s, and if they can use steganography that’s been created by AI to maintain persistence, what happens when the wheels come off the bus? What happens when geopolitical tension gets to a certain boiling point over Ukraine?”

While this attacker was an individual hacker – not a state-sponsored crime syndicate – “the nature of the culture of the Russian cybercrime community is: you only act alone for a New York minute,” Kellermann said. “At some point, you’re going to be reined in by one of the cybercrime cartels.”®

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

We Talk About Whole Children. What About Whole Educators?

Published

on

In 2010, a young woman walked into my office at the childcare center I directed in Arizona. She was nervous. She didn’t have experience in early childhood education. She just needed a job.

In most centers, that’s where the story would end. Instead, I offered her a working interview — two observational hours in an infant classroom. When she came back into my office, she was beaming. “I love this,” she told me. “Just give me a chance. I’ll learn.”

Her name is Lindsay. Fifteen years later, she’s still teaching.

Seeing the Educator

Lindsay’s story isn’t just about passion or perseverance; it’s about support. We made a deliberate choice — over and over again — to see her as a whole person first and an employee second. We figured out scheduling so she could get her Child Development Associate (CDA) credential. We found coverage when she needed practicum hours elsewhere. I wasn’t there for every step of Lindsay’s journey that followed, but she and I have stayed in touch throughout all these years. She earned her associate’s degree and then her bachelor’s degree; she grew from part-time infant teacher to lead teacher to program coordinator.

Advertisement

Lindsay’s story shows us what happens when an educator is truly seen — something our field has yet to get right. What gets overlooked most in conversations about the quality of early childhood education is that educators are engineers. Every learning opportunity a young child experiences is designed, built and brought to life by a teacher. There is no curriculum three-year-olds activate for themselves. Every moment of discovery, every language-rich exchange and every carefully scaffolded small group experience is built by someone. A teacher looks at a group of children, weighs their individual needs, considers the family’s hopes, aligns these needs and hopes to learning objectives and makes a decision about what to put in front of those kids at that moment. And they do this all day long.

These educators sit at the nexus of everyone’s expectations — the school’s, the family’s, the child’s — and constantly make consequential decisions on behalf of all of them. How well they make those decisions depends on how well we support them. And right now, we are falling short.

When teachers worked within a connected ecosystem of curriculum, assessment and live PD, teacher retention rates increased by 23 percent

New research shows what becomes possible when we get this right. A multiyear randomized controlled trial conducted by the National Institute for Early Education Research at Rutgers University examined 125 preschool classrooms across public and private settings over three school years. When teachers worked within a connected ecosystem of curriculum, assessment and live professional learning, teacher retention rates increased by 23 percentage points. In turn, children in those classrooms demonstrated gains in social-emotional, language, and math skills, according to the GOLD assessment. Educators reported higher personal accomplishment and lower fatigue, not because the work got easier but because they felt genuinely equipped to do it well.

Advertisement

Teaching young children is weighty work, and anyone who tells you otherwise hasn’t done it. But there is a profound difference between the exhaustion of doing hard work well and the burnout of doing hard work alone, unsupported and without feedback or the necessary tools. The first is sustainable. The second is what’s driving teachers out of the profession.

Our field is philosophically built on the science of the whole child — the idea that social, emotional, cognitive and relational development are all deeply interconnected. And yet the systems we’ve built to support the adults in our classrooms are fragmented, episodic and too often driven by compliance. A one-day training here. An on-demand module there. A checklist where a lifeline should be.

What drove the study’s results wasn’t any single tool; it was coherence. Curriculum, assessment, coaching and both on-demand and live professional learning operated as an integrated system.

I’ve seen up close what the absence of that looks like. During a recent site visit, I walked into a classroom where a beautifully designed curriculum sat on the shelf, spine uncracked. The teacher was running circle time from a bag of worn printables she’d been reusing for years. When I pulled the curriculum down and opened it with her, her face lit up. She had no idea. Nobody had ever shown her, told her she was expected to use it or checked in to see whether she had. That pattern is everywhere. Leaders make good decisions about what to invest in and then underinvest in making sure those tools are actually used and used well.

Advertisement

The Policy Choice

For policymakers expanding access to early childhood care and education right now, the central policy question is not just what to fund, but how to design systems that enable educators to succeed. Funding curriculum adoption without funding the professional learning infrastructure that makes it sustainable leaves impact on the table. We must invest in the connective tissue — the coaching, the feedback loops and the live and sustained support — that moves the needle. And we have proved that live, sustained support can be delivered very effectively in a virtual model. It’s scalable.

For district and program leaders: Start with an honest audit. Are curriculum, assessment, coaching and professional development working in concert? Are teachers receiving consistent, specific feedback on their practice? Those are the gaps where good teachers lose their footing — and where people like Lindsay either take root or walk away.

Lindsay didn’t stay because the system worked; she stayed because someone made it work for her. But we cannot build a workforce on heroic individual efforts alone. We need systems designed to see educators fully — their potential, their development and the weight of what they carry every day.

We’re a field that talks about whole children. It’s time we design systems that support the whole educator. The evidence is there. Now we need to act on it.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How Nokia’s Feature Phones Lost to the Smartphone Era

Published

on

In 2005, Nokia sold its billionth mobile phone, a budget-friendly device that went to a customer in Nigeria. By then, the company, based in Espoo, Finland, was making one of every three cellphones globally.

But just nine years later, the mobile-device maker offloaded its entire handset division to Microsoft for pennies on the dollar, compared to what it had been worth at its peak.

Nokia had risen from obscurity in the 1990s to become a worldwide cultural phenomenon by the turn of the millennium, its signature devices featured in TV shows and movies, announcing their presence with instantly recognizable Nokia ringtones.

Advertisement

As Nokia was becoming comfortable in the spotlight, the smartphone era arrived. And what came next was swift and brutal. But, as revealed in Nokia internal documents recently made public and interviews with key Nokia engineers from that era, the company saw it coming. Within 24 hours of Apple CEO Steve Jobs’s iPhone unveiling in 2007, Nokia was already weighing its options. They’d immediately recognized the threat. However, outrunning it was another matter.

What follows is Nokia’s story over 14 years, from 1998 to 2012, as the world’s top cellphone maker—how its devices defined their time, how the tech reshaped what phones could be and do, and how the company’s good fortunes in the handset business came to an end.

Nokia Was Once Unbeatable

The centerpiece Nokia devices, the ones that people probably think of when they see the words “Nokia phone,” were the 3210 and its cousin, the 3310. TechRadar has called the 3310 “the greatest phone of all time.”

A left hand holds a Nokia 3210 phone with a Nokia store in the background. Nokia’s 3210 phone, released in 1999, was an inexpensive device aimed at younger users. Colin McPherson/Alamy

Released in 1999 and 2000, respectively, the two devices sold more than 280 million units worldwide. Their most innovative hardware feature was the internal antenna—the first mass-market phone without even a stub or retractable aerial. “Consumers had the perception that it could not work well without an external antenna,” said Peter Røpke, a former Nokia senior vice president, in a 2016 interview with Slate.

Advertisement

The phones shipped with games, including the legendary Snake, one of the most popular pre-smartphone mobile games—in which a pixelated serpent eats and grows with every morsel consumed.

Nokia introduced no small portion of the world to texting. At the time of the 3210 and 3310, the prevailing texting standard was SMS (short message service), which allowed up to 160 characters per message. Nokia appended its own Nokia smart-messaging service to SMS, which allowed the sending of small bitmapped images across an otherwise text-only system. A rich-text messaging system that allowed visual images, audio, and video followed in 2002, leading to a multimedia messaging service (MMS) standard that remains in place today.

Nokia also enabled users to easily create and share ringtones on their devices. By 2000, Nokia’s custom-ringtone Composer app had popularized a new, short-form musical medium that the ringtone industry, at its peak, would transform into a billion-dollar marketplace in the United States.

A face-on view of the Nokia 1100 feature phone, including a keypad and a black-and-white LCD screen.  Nokia introduced its 1100 phone in 2003 and ultimately sold half a billion units, making it the most popular cellphone in history. Paul Chesne/Donaldson Collection/Getty Images

A few years later, Nokia reimagined its mobile handsets, releasing the 1100 in 2003. The 1100 sold a half a billion units, more than any cellphone in history. It remains one of the best-selling consumer products ever. Much of the 1100’s success was due to its price tag—in the neighborhood of US $100, making it at the time Nokia’s most affordable device.

Advertisement

Also contributing to the 1100’s popularity were features designed for longevity and tough environments, including dust resistance, nonslip sides for better handling in rainy conditions, and a 400-hour standby battery life. The 1100 introduced a flashlight as well, which the user turned on and off by holding down the “C” key.

Where most device makers at the time were worried about camera megapixels and color screens, Nokia had leapfrogged its competition with a back-to-basics phone that could survive the rain, endure unreliable power grids, and light the way home.

Apple Launched the iPhone, Nokia Scrambled

On 9 January 2007, at the Macworld conference in San Francisco, Steve Jobs made a characteristically bold claim. “Today, Apple is reinventing the phone,” he said, soon pulling one of the first iPhones out of his pocket.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs holds up one of the first iPhones while standing in front of an Apple logo.  Apple CEO Steve Jobs famously launched the iPhone at the Macworld Conference in San Francisco on 9 January 2007. Nokia held a rapid-response meeting to the event the following day. Tony Avelar/AFP/Getty Images

Rumors of Apple entering the phone market had swirled since the iPod’s debut in 2001, but nobody had really reckoned with what that might mean.

Advertisement

“Executive summary: Apple iPhone is a serious high-end contender,” read a slide from a Nokia internal meeting held the day after Jobs’s keynote. (That slide is now in the company’s online archives, opened to the public last year.)

“User interface has been a big strength for Nokia,” it continued. “Nokia needs to develop touch [user interface] to fight back.”

Peter Bryer, at the time Nokia’s manager of strategic foresight, was part of that 10 January meeting, and he recalls that Jobs’s announcement wasn’t unexpected. But the iPhone’s extensive reliance on multitouch—save for a single home button on the front—did surprise the team.

Nokia was already aware of multitouch technology, Bryer notes. In 2006, the U.S. computer scientist Jeff Han had given a celebrated TED talk about it, demonstrating a multitouch screen, which could sense multiple fingers on the screen at a time, not just one. Bryer remembers his colleague Timo Partanen, then Nokia’s director of market and competitor analysis, getting excited about Han’s demo.

Advertisement

A man stands in front of a tilted large electronic screen, whose reverse side is also visible.  In 2006, the NYU research scientist Jeff Han showed off a new multitouch interface technology as part of a popular TED talk. By the end of the decade, multitouch—in which multiple fingers can interact with a touchscreen at once—would play a key role in smartphones from Apple, HTC, and Palm. Steve Jurvetson/Flickr

“Timo burst into the room, saying, ‘You’ve got to see this TED video of this guy using multitouch,’” Bryer recalls. “We both thought that was cool and that’s the future. Then I looked at the sponsors of the presenter’s research, and among them were Nokia and Microsoft.”

And yet it took Nokia years to develop a phone that used multitouch. “Remember, Nokia is based in Finland,” he says. “It’s very cold in Finland. They wear gloves for six months of the year, including the executives. They didn’t think a device like that would work.”

Two hands wearing winter gloves hold a Nokia phone. Winter gloves were no obstacle to operating the chunky buttons on Nokia phones, a design priority perhaps stemming from the company’s Finnish culture and headquarters. Erol Gurian/laif/Redux

Partanen was also at Nokia’s post-iPhone launch meeting, and recalls that there was little concern in the room. “We felt okay,” he says. “This is yet another competitor launching a great product. But we had no doubt that, if it’s successful, we would do the same. We will launch similar products.”

Two hands hold and interact with a touchscreen phone. The right hand uses a stylus to interface with the device.  In November 2008, Nokia released the 5800 Xpress Music, a year and a half after Apple had launched its iPhone. Shaun Curry/AFP/Getty Images

That similar product ended up being the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic, known as the Tube, released in 2008. “The idea was to focus on streaming videos and television,” Partanen says. “So we made a phone with a similar form factor to the iPhone [that was] optimized for streaming content.” But the 5800 was “delayed, delayed, delayed, delayed,” he says. “It didn’t materialize in the way it was planned. It was released as a watered-down version.”

Advertisement

Critics skewered the 5800’s “outdated” feature set and “ancient” S60 operating system, which ran on top of Symbian OS, an open-source mobile platform Nokia had recently acquired. The 5800 sold reasonably well for its time, reaching around 8 million units in its first year alone. But it did not feature multitouch.

“I think that started to be the point when everybody realized that, hey, this is by far more difficult than earlier competitive issues we’ve had,” Partanen says.

Nokia finally released its first device with multitouch in 2010, three years after Jobs’s splashy iPhone announcement and four years after Han’s TED talk demo.

How Android Ate Up the Low-End Market

Nokia had long owned the low end of the cellphone market, with its sturdy, no-frills devices suited for that segment. So the years immediately following the iPhone’s launch saw the Finnish firm continue to thrive as it kept turning out simple, rugged devices.

Advertisement

As one review of the Nokia 1200—successor to the 1100—put it in October 2007, “This handset chucks away all the fancy features you’ve come to expect on a modern mobile, leaving you with a pared-down feature set that’s easy for tech novices to get their heads around.”

A man behind a wire screen holds up a Nokia phone to a user in the foreground, who looks at the device.  Two cellphone users in Nairobi, Kenya in 2013 exchange a payment on a Nokia 1200 phone via the M-Pesa Mobile Money Market, a popular online banking service. Trevor Snapp/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The 1200 kept the 1100’s dust-proofing, flashlight, and long-lasting battery, and added features aimed squarely at the developing world. The 1200 was the first to include call-time tracking and a multiuser phone book, allowing owners who planned to lend their device to set up call limits based on time or cost. This feature helped enable what Nokia researchers called kiosks—informal pay-per-call services, in which an enterprising phone subscriber charged neighbors and family members by the minute for use of the device.

In 2006, Nokia studied how Ugandans used their Nokia phones in rural and remote areas. An internal company slide deck from the time reveals just how keyed-in Nokia was to its lowest-income users. “Village phone operators are often women,” the slide deck notes. “And there tend to be a lot of children around. (Phones need to suffer considerable abuse from chewing, dust, sweat, etc.)”

“A unit of phone time is 60 seconds,” another slide states. “But to avoid accidentally going over that time and incurring extra costs, kiosk operators shorten the unit to 57 seconds, allowing a three-second margin of error. Shared mobile used as phone kiosk must show call time.”

Advertisement

Nokia’s familiarity with its market couldn’t protect the company forever, though.

Man in a village holds up a document with a detailed hand-drawn Nokia phone sketch. Nokia sought out user input around the world for the company’s device designs, including hosting “Open Studio” contests soliciting users’ sketches of their dream cellphone. Shaul Schwarz/Getty Images

That’s because the iPhone wasn’t Nokia’s only looming smartphone competitor. In September 2008, the first Android phone went on sale—the HTC Dream, which was also sold as the T-Mobile G1.

While the iPhone was aimed mostly at early adopters and affluent users who could afford to drop hundreds of dollars on a new phone, Android phones were, within a couple of years, aiming at the same low-cost, global user base Nokia was selling to.

“I think it’s fair to say Android is the one that disrupted the market more for Nokia,” Bryer says. “Most of Nokia’s successful devices were not on the high-end market. But then, when Android came along, it started to fill that lower end and eventually took that market away from us.”

Advertisement

A man holds two phones while standing in front of a large poster showing enlarged versions of the two devices.  An executive from Nokia India in 2010 holds the company’s 5530 Xpress Music and 5230 phones, both of which had touchscreens, although only the 5530 had Wi-Fi. Sam Panthaky/AFP/Getty Images

With two emerging competitors in the low end and high end, the Finnish device maker responded with a device that split the difference—and satisfied neither camp.

Released in 2009, the Nokia 5230 attempted to be a low-priced, touchscreen (though not multitouch) competitor to both the iPhone and Android. It sold an impressive 150 million units, doing especially well in developing countries.

But the 5230 didn’t have Wi-Fi—one of the biggest complaints at the time. In the developing world, Wi-Fi connections were still rare, so the lack of Wi-Fi made some sense. But the rest of the world was not pleased.

“We had such a big gap and dominant position,” Bryer says. “Which does maybe create a level of comfort which you should never get.”

Advertisement

How Nokia Lost the Smartphone Race

By the beginning of the 2010s, Nokia could have still drawn from the company’s labs, which were regularly spinning out new technologies and innovations. However, the Finnish handset maker ultimately failed to turn its R&D into viable new product lines in response to the emerging smartphone threat.

Nokia’s predicament had precedent—Kodak, dominant in film photography, had actually invented the digital camera in 1975 but failed to commercialize it before digital imaging made its core business obsolete.

“The technology coming from our R&D teams was cutting edge,” says Gordon Murray-Smith, director of services and ecosystems intelligence from 2008 to 2011. He recalls attending annual R&D innovation days that showcased work on self-healing materials and flexible screens, long before those technologies were seen elsewhere. “But why was Nokia not able to commercialize some of that really interesting and innovative activity more than it did?”

Nokia desperately needed an injection of life to change its fortunes. The company’s first non-Finnish CEO, Stephen Elop (a Canadian fresh off a two-year stint on Microsoft’s leadership team), did not mince words.

Advertisement

In an internal memo from February 2011 that was soon leaked to the media, Elop wrote, “The first iPhone shipped in 2007, and we still don’t have a product that is close to their experience. Android came on the scene just over two years ago, and this week they took our leadership position in smartphone volumes. Unbelievable.”

A hand holds a red Nokia touchscreen phone above a smart speaker device.  In 2011, Nokia released the N9, a smartphone with a Linux-derived operating system. Within a year, Nokia had pivoted toward its Windows Phone-powered line of Lumia devices. Munshi Ahmed/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Elop oversaw the 2011 launch of a Linux-based smartphone, the Nokia N9. The N9 ran on a distribution of Linux called MeeGo. Reviewers at the time praised the new smartphone direction the Finnish phone maker had taken. “Possibly the most beautiful phone ever made,” wrote one reviewer about the N9 for Engadget.

But the N9’s accolades did not ultimately carry the day. Nokia announced its Lumia line of phones the same year—a direct pivot away from MeeGo toward the Windows Phone. It would be the last major strategic turn Nokia would take as a cellphone manufacturer. From this point forward, a succession of C-suite decisions all but sealed the fate of Nokia’s iconic line of phones.

In 2013, Microsoft announced its bid to acquire Nokia’s handset operations. After the sale went through the following year, it rebranded the division Microsoft Mobile. But the year after that, Microsoft decided it had made a costly mistake, writing down $7.6 billionnearly what it paid for Nokia’s handset division—and laying off nearly half of the former Nokia staff it had inherited.

Advertisement

In 2016, Microsoft sold its feature phone assets to HMD Global. The latter still sells Nokia-branded phonesbudget-friendly devices as well as nostalgia reproductions of models from Nokia’s glory days. What remained was a brand name, some intellectual property, and two decades of hard-won lessons about what it takes to stay on top—and what it costs when you can’t.

“When you look at the players in the world of smartphones today, any of those players would struggle ever to achieve 14 consecutive years of being No. 1,” says Murray-Smith.

Partanen says there was a downside to Nokia’s mobile-phone dominance. “Often, being the first mover is not necessarily the best position,” he says. “Being a quick follower is the best position.”

The company itself ultimately survived, even if the transition wasn’t painless. Nokia’s revenues, which peaked in 2007, fell sharply through the mid-2010s before the company refocused on a decades-old business line—telecom infrastructure—that many had forgotten Nokia was even in. Nokia now ranks among the world’s top three suppliers of 5G network equipment, serving carriers across more than 125 countries, alongside Ericsson and Huawei. Although the company could never quite crack the smartphone, it now plays a key role in providing the network backbone those smartphones run on.

Advertisement

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Owning an Apple Home: The broken promise of Matter

Published

on

Matter has been a unifying standard for the smart home, but it hasn’t saved users from the complexity it promised to fix. Here’s where it falls short in some of our Apple Homes.

The smart home started life as a disjointed mess and new standards hoped to unify the different platforms. Today, everything feels a little too spread out even with better cross-platform compatibility.

Don’t get me wrong, owning a smart home has been much improved thanks to Matter. The Connectivity Standards Alliance has done great work.

The latest standard, Matter, was built with Apple HomeKit as the foundation. For whatever reason, Apple has failed to keep up, and the industry doesn’t seem all that interested in reducing reliance on their apps.

Advertisement

Products have only become more complex, for better or worse. The most interesting and powerful tools are being kept siloed inside of manufacturers’ apps instead of being donated via Matter.

More apps and systems mean more complexity, which leads to every member of a home needing to be a technical expert to operate devices. No one should need a manual for operating an overhead light.

One more standard

I’m not going to pretend to know the depths of Matter and Thread as standards. I’m sure some parts of these complaints are issues spread across multiple companies, but that doesn’t mean the problems don’t exist.

XKCD comic: 14 competing standards inspire two stick figures to create a universal standard; final panel humorously reveals the result as 15 competing standards instead.

Image source: XKCD comic ‘Standards’

Advertisement

I can take the time to learn an app, how it connects to HomeKit, Matter, Siri, Shortcuts, or other third-party apps to build automations. Heck, I could even find a way to connect devices through Home Assistant or similar programs.

Things have never been more interconnected, and in some ways that’s great. I only need to verify Matter support and it can connect to my Apple Home.

That simple unifying standard was the missing magic in the early smart home. For example, I couldn’t use Nest or Samsung Smart Things because they were not a part of HomeKit.

Matter brings those disparate ecosystems into Apple Home, and vice versa.

Advertisement
Small Apple TV box beneath a television on a wooden table, with a slim white remote control lying in front, screen displaying streaming content at the top edge

Apple’s most expensive set top box has a Thread radio which helps connect Matter over Thread devices

The problem isn’t that they aren’t able to interconnect, but that manufacturers seem to believe simple controls are enough to draw people in via Matter support. Sure, a Govee smart light can be toggled on and off in Apple Home, but special scenes are locked up inside the Govee app.

It doesn’t matter where the fault lies — partially with Apple Home, partially with Matter, partially with companies like Govee — but the problem exists. It makes using a smart home worse for everyone.

The third-party app conundrum

It’s amazing that I can control so many devices from all of these manufacturers in Apple Home. Automations let me set power states, colors, temperatures, locks, and so much more all within one app.

Advertisement

Govee’s odd choices

The whole smart home “simplicity” goal falls down when I need to manage special features of a product in a separate app. This came to light most recently in my review of the Govee 21-inch Ceiling Light Ultra.

Round ceiling light glowing with soft gradient colors of blue, cyan, and pink, casting a faint halo on the textured ceiling in a dark room

The Govee app is required for most functions of this ceiling light

It’s an interesting circular light fixture with just enough pixel resolution in the light to display blurry images. It’s a neat effect, but everything surrounding that feature is in the Govee app.

Nanoleaf also has more advanced functionality for its Shapes smart panels line, which has to be managed in the Nanoleaf app. The difference is that these scenes are donated to Apple Home using what is apparently a hacked-together solution.

Advertisement

Apple clearly needs to make it easier to bring more complex controls and options in to Apple Home, that’s on them. However, for a $250 ceiling light with Matter support, I expect more options in the Home app, that’s on Govee.

What makes me pick on Govee so much in this instance is its choice for the fixture to be represented as only one light in Apple Home. It is actually two addressable lights in the Govee app, and that difference can cause maddening results.

I’m not sure why Govee would have made that decision other than attempting to drive users to their app. That mentality is why I now need at least 8 apps from smart home vendors, an additional 4 apps for products that should be in Apple Home, plus Siri and Shortcuts.

Smartphone screen against blue background showing a folder labeled Other, containing several rows of colorful app icons on a dark wallpaper with subtle pattern

The number of apps I need for my home seems to multiply over time

Advertisement

Let me be clear: I am a power user and would have all of those apps installed anyway. I like having access to the controls and deeper systems as needed for troubleshooting and automation.

What I don’t like is requiring everyone in my home to use all of those apps to gain full functionality of these devices. I can take the time to donate a scene to Siri Shortcuts then map that action to a physical button or command, but that level of complexity isn’t ideal and leaves other users out of the loop.

Every function not available in the Home app may as well not exist. The Govee image feature was rarely used outside of testing because it was out of sight, out of mind.

Again, I could set up an automation in the Govee app to have various images and animations play throughout the day or week. That can create some awkward situations, like not being able to turn off only the bottom light without a special command, shortcut, or app.

Advertisement

Don’t bother with non HomeKit Secure Video cameras

I’ve had some other frustrating issues with some cameras I’ve tested from SwitchBot. The company included them and a hub capable of Home Assistant as part of testing another device I’ll be reviewing in the future.

Two modern security cameras and a smartphone resting on a wooden table in a dimly lit room, suggesting a smart home surveillance setup

HomeKit Secure Video is the only option for your Apple Home

Apparently, I’m meant to use Home Assistant to bring the non-HomeKit cameras from SwitchBot into my Apple Home. I had never used Home Assistant before, so I gave it a shot, and the results were miserable.

When the Apple Home connection failed, the SwitchBot app itself showed the cameras, but that’s yet another area I’d need to go for information about my home. Plus, these cameras are excluded from Apple’s new AI features for HomeKit Secure Video, which SwitchBot points to an OpenClaw AI hub for similar functionality.

Advertisement

No thank you.

As an Apple Home user, I can’t advise anyone to buy anything but HomeKit Secure Video at this point, even with Home Assistant in play. It’s just not the same and not at all reliable.

Extend this out a bit more, and you need third-party apps to manage most functions outside of power states. Setup, user options, and more are all tied to the third-party apps, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.

In an ideal world, I’d be able to install a smart lock, attach users, set passcodes, and see battery levels all within Apple Home. Needing so many apps for a single home is not good for the user.

Advertisement
Smart speaker with dark mesh exterior, glowing multicolored light on top, set against a vivid red background

Voice commands can only get your family members so far

I’m not even sure of a good analogy because the situation is kind of absurd. It’s like having a universal remote that can turn on the TV, but the manufacturer’s remote can only change the channels, and volume control is available via subscription.

Matter reliability and troubleshooting

Matter and Thread aren’t exactly what you’d call transparent. If there’s a Home Hub issue, or some other networking problem, your stuff just won’t work right.

And it’s worse if its an intermittent problem. There’s no good mapping tools, no good troubleshooting tools, and notifications of an issue are vague. A notification saying that a Home Hub isn’t connectable isn’t helpful.

Advertisement

You can walk over to a Home Hub and reboot it. If that doesn’t fix the problem, then what? There’s no amplifying information, and the most common problem-solving step is to reboot your entire Thread network.

Our own Mike Wuerthele had a HomeKit lock to test. Like above, it worked in the App, and in HomeKit with a toggle, but HomeKey didn’t work properly. After talking to Apple and talking to the lock manufacturer, they both agreed that Mike should cut all power to his house at the breaker, wait 10 minutes, and restart everything to rebuild the Matter and Thread connectivity.

Ridiculous.

And then, there’s the Ikea situation. The hardware is inexpensive, and when it works, it works great. The problem is, it fails silently. Ikea points their finger at Matter, and Matter blames Ikea.

Advertisement

The solution seems to be power-cycling your Home Hub and the devices. There has to be a better way.

Nobody seems interested in figuring out how to make and deliver basic Matter troubleshooting tools. The best advice anybody has to give is telling customers with a shrug that they should reboot.

When the exact same problem crops up again, and again, across multiple device vendors, it’s clear that whatever it is, is a foundational issue that Matter and/or Apple need to figure out.

No matter how tech-savvy the main user is or isn’t, there’s a problem here. Matter is unifying, but only in basic controls, which is a failure.

Advertisement

Perhaps Apple can step in and do something once it remembers it has a smart home ecosystem.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

How to watch 2026 FIFA World Cup in Singapore: free live streams

Published

on

Prior to the tournament, Singapore’s Mediacorp broadcaster announced that it would stream 28 World Cup 2026 matches completely FREE on both TV and online via its MeWatch streaming platform. While that’s nowhere close to the likes of the UK’s BBC/ITV or Australia’s SBS On Demand, which are streaming all 104 matches for free, it’s still a significant jump from the nine matches that were streamed free in 2022.

The good news for football fans in Singapore tuning in for the business end of the tournament is that all four remaining matches, including the two semifinals, the third-place playoff, and the all-important FIFA World Cup final, are available to watch free of charge in the country.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The Critical Path Forward, How SpaceX Engineers Battle Time, Trouble, and Tiny Details to Launch Starship Version 3

Published

on

SpaceX Starship Critical Path Documentary
SpaceX just released a new documentary that drops straight into the control rooms and launch site during the final stretch before its biggest rocket flew again. Titled Critical Path, the 34-minute film follows engineers at Starbase in Texas through the intense days leading up to Flight 12 on May 22. It is the second episode in their ongoing series and stays tightly focused on the real work required to get the first Version 3 Starship and Super Heavy off the ground.



Version 3 was a total revamp from the start for both stages. It was a completely different ballgame with a new upper stage, a new booster, updated Raptor engines, and a totally new launch pad designed to handle the strains of flying more regularly. The documentary demonstrates how all of those modifications resulted in a whole new set of dependencies that all had to fall into place on time. Engineers begin by explaining the critical path in simple terms. Simply said, it is the longest chain of jobs, with each step dependent on the previous one. Any delay in that chain means that the entire launch is pushed back. They describe the ongoing discipline of keeping an eye on those links without becoming bogged down in second-guessing, which would only stifle growth.


LEGO Icons NASA Artemis Space Launch System – DIY Rocket Model Building Set for Adults, Ages 18+ – Gifts…
  • NASA rocket model kit – Launch into a creative project with the LEGO Icons NASA Artemis Space Launch System model building project for adult space…
  • What’s in the box? – This creative building set includes everything you need to craft a multistage rocket with 2 solid-fuel boosters, an Orion…
  • Features and Functions – This NASA-themed rocket model features retractable launch tower umbilicals, rocket support and crew bridge, detachable…

The story begins with a 10 engine static fire on the booster. The crew was looking for strong evidence of how the new pad and engines would perform together under stress. An early attempt was cut short when sensors detected unexpected vibration on the flame diverter. They modified things and then completed a full-duration burn on the second attempt. When the clean data began to arrive, there was a noticeable sense of relief.

SpaceX Starship Critical Path Documentary
We get a close-up view of the new Pad 2 infrastructure. This is a gigantic flame diverter that can route the exhaust from 33 engines. Water deluge systems are on standby, ready to convert into steam and remove heat from the concrete and steel. The design is based on the hard lessons learned from earlier flights that ruined the original pad. Crews had never attached the quick-disconnect propellant arms or flowed fuel on this pad previously. Small pressure blips and mild movement in those arms during testing were carefully examined.

SpaceX Starship Critical Path Documentary
One launch attempt was canceled when those peculiarities reappeared in the closing minutes. The crew labored late one night to find out a solution, and then added a simple welded hard stop to limit any undesired motion, which held on the next attempt. Another sequence depicts what occurs when something breaks on a large moving item; following the static fire, a link in the chain on one of the tower arms collapsed during retraction. The catch mechanism has to be fixed immediately away. Spare parts arrived from the other side of the nation, and crane men worked all night. After 30 hours, the arm was back up and working nicely.

SpaceX Starship Critical Path Documentary
For this flight, twenty-two objects were placed into the bay, including mass simulators and two modified Starlink satellites equipped with cameras. With a total mass of 37.5 metric tons (the heaviest payload the Starship has ever carried), the team had to double-check every last surface to ensure that nothing would come loose at the worst possible time, and recovery planning is not overlooked; in fact, it receives a lot of attention. One of the mission’s key objectives was to acquire some extremely high-quality imagery of the heat shield during re-entry; the splashdown site featured the most buoys, drones, and support vessels observed in the Indian Ocean to date. This meant that they needed all of that hardware to collect reliable data on how the vehicle performed under the extreme heat of re-entry to create an accurate model.

SpaceX Starship Critical Path Documentary
When the launch day arrived, the first countdown had to be halted due to a quick-disconnect pressure reading that did not match. Engineers felt it was best to stand down and focus on the remedy, which they did, implementing it overnight and hoped for the best. They returned the next evening, fully prepared, and liftoff went off without a hitch. All 33 engines started up cleanly and supplied the power they were designed to. One of them shut down briefly during the ascent, but the car continued to climb. Hot staging, the key step in which the stages separate, was a breeze; nothing got stuck up or caused us any problems. The upper stage placed the payload in orbit and then performed a controlled re-entry, complete with a little banking maneuver to test the rear flaps and see how they would react when things got hot. Needless to say, it splashed down exactly on target in the Indian Ocean.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Best RGB TVs (2026): My Picks After Testing the Hottest TVs

Published

on

Televisions are evolving yet again. This time, the new kid on the block is mini RGB, which emits red, green, and blue lights through an LCD panel instead of just white or blue lights. According to Hisense, one of the first brands to debut an RGB LED TV, the technology is an attempt to produce “pure colors directly at the source.”

The intended result is LED TVs with better colors, improved contrast, and much higher brightness—all designed as a proper alternative to OLED. Whether it’s a giant leap forward, though, depends greatly on the kind of movies and shows you watch and your willingness to tweak a few settings. I tested five new models to get a taste of what’s to come and to determine which (if any) you should buy.

For more TV recommendations based on our expert testing, peruse our related guides, including the Best TVs, Best Large TVs, Best OLED TVs, and Best Cheap TVs. Also check out How to Buy the Right TV for you in 2026.

The first RGB TVs came out in 2025, but it’s really in 2026 that the technology is getting wider distribution across sizes and prices. As I stated above, an RGB TV has conventional LED backlighting but uses a red, green, and blue backlight module rather than the standard white or blue LEDs. But it’s not quite that simple. Samsung and LG call it “micro RGB,” while TCL and Hisense say “mini RGB.” The tech works roughly the same, even if micro RGB uses smaller LEDs. Sony uses the term “True RGB” and claims there’s no difference between mini RGB and micro RGB.

Advertisement

My goal in testing, though, was to cut through the marketing spin and just put each model through a few benchmarks, watch the same movies, and stay glued to the World Cup no matter which model I was testing. The surprising discovery is that mini RGB (which is the term I’ll use for all of them) is noticeably vivid, has excellent contrast, and looks bright and clear even during the daytime. Mini RGB televisions are also excellent for off-angle watching.

That said, I don’t think you have to put that OLED up on Facebook Marketplace just yet. Mini RGB is an evolution in tech, but it also means manufacturers can keep using LCD panels. OLED was a sea change because individual pixels can emit color or be turned off entirely. In my side-by-side tests, mini RGB is a smart upgrade but isn’t the ultimate display tech. While the costs are comparable for now, I expect mini RGB televisions to come down in price soon.

Why Choose a Mini RGB Over Other Models?

The name mini RGB would imply that it is all about color—specifically red, green, and blue. Yet, the way the technology works by shining those colors through an LCD panel means there is a lot more control over contrast and brightness as well.

Advertisement

In my tests, I found settings for brightness, clarity, contrast, and picture mode had a much more obvious impact than on a normal LED or QLED. I equate this to a sports car. You can drive a BMW M5 on a side street at low speeds, but until you enable track mode, adjust the suspension, and perform other tweaks, you won’t really know what the car can do. Mini RGB is similar in that it’s highly customizable.

How Much Do RGB TVs Actually Cost?

Anything brand-new to the market will likely cost more than we might expect. While the Hisense UR9 RGB Mini-LED was the cheapest by far at only $1,999 for the 65-inch model, every other mini RGB and micro RGB costs closer to $4,000. That’s about $1,300 more than an OLED at the same size. The flagship OLED models from LG and Samsung tend to cost around $2,700 for a 65-inch. LED and QLED models are even cheaper, running as low as $500.

How Easy Are They to Mount?

Advertisement

As with any modern television, mounting one on a wall is fairly easy since there’s so much information online about how to do it. I’ve found YouTube videos that explain exactly what to do, even covering how to install an electrical box. Mainly, you have to use a stud finder and make sure you’re mounting the brackets into a stud and not just sheetrock, but even that process only takes a few minutes.

The one exception is if you go with a larger-size mini RGB model like the TCL RM9L RGB-Mini LED. If the television weighs over 100 pounds, it changes the ball game in terms of using multiple studs and adding extra mounting brackets.

The Best Overall RGB TV

LG makes high-end televisions that tend to be a bit pricey, but they’re often worth the extra expense. The LG Micro RGB Evo is no different. Priced at $4,500 (that’s with a $500 discount right now) for the 75-inch model I tested, this is one brilliantly colorful and impressive television.

Setup and install were simple. It’s just a matter of inserting the legs and screwing them in tight. My only complaint here was the legs were a bit pointy. For connectivity, the LG Micro RGB Evo has four HDMI 2.1 ports, an Ethernet port, one digital optical, a coaxial connection, and two USB 2.0 ports. WebOS is a capable streaming platform, if a bit confusing and bloated with too many apps and advertisements.

Advertisement

Movies and shows looked stunning and vivid on this television, once I got used to tweaking the picture modes. By default, some of the stock settings (e.g., Filmmaker mode) made movies like Awake on Netflix look too dark. Tron: Ares on Disney+ was vivid with deep blacks and reds.

While the LG Micro RGB Evo worked perfectly fine for console gaming, it had some trouble with a gaming laptop. The variable refresh rate setting, which LG calls Motion Booster, did not work correctly when I used an Alienware 16X Aurora laptop. However, at the native 165-Hz refresh rate, this model is a game changer—Crimson Desert looked absolutely stunning.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025